Additional Info: Current total views of videos released that year.
Report an error
Average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of edits to the Wikipedia article for Dionysus | r=0.94 | 9yrs | No |
The number of economists in Alabama | r=0.93 | 8yrs | Yes! |
Petroluem consumption in Cayman Islands | r=0.93 | 8yrs | Yes! |
Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America | r=0.92 | 9yrs | No |
The number of psychiatric technicians in Nebraska | r=0.91 | 6yrs | No |
Low-fat and nonfat ice cream products consumption | r=0.86 | 8yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'thats what she said' meme | r=0.73 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'surprised pikachu' meme | r=0.7 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Average views of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)