about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,801 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How nerdy OverSimplified YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Hydopower energy generated in Algeria.  The chart goes from 2016 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the hydroelectric output in Algeria wanes, so too does the energy available to power the computers responsible for generating OverSimplified video titles. This leads to a decrease in the nerdy references, as the limited energy supply forces the algorithm to prioritize more essential functions over injecting nerdy puns into the video titles. So, the next time you're missing those historical and nerdy references, just remember, it all boils down to the shocking shortage of hydroelectric power in Algeria.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: "Generate an image of a dimly lit room in Algeria, with hydroelectric turbines slowing down as the energy output decreases. In the foreground, computers responsible for generating video titles are depicted, their screens fading as the power dwindles. The algorithm prioritizes essential functions in the limited energy, resulting in fewer nerdy references in the video titles. The subdued hum of the computers conserving energy is felt throughout the room. The image should capture the futuristic aspects of the setting, such as advanced computer technology and the integration of hydroelectric power." The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How nerdy OverSimplified YouTube video titles are and Hydopower energy generated in Algeria. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Celtic art Minimalism Futuristic Cutsy graphics
ChatGPT: Futuristic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How nerdy OverSimplified YouTube video titles are and Hydopower energy generated in Algeria, in the following situation: As the hydroelectric output in Algeria wanes, so too does the energy available to power the computers responsible for generating OverSimplified video titles. This leads to a decrease in the nerdy references, as the limited energy supply forces the algorithm to prioritize more essential functions over injecting nerdy puns into the video titles. So, the next time you're missing those historical and nerdy references, just remember, it all boils down to the shocking shortage of hydroelectric power in Algeria.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a dimly lit room in Algeria, the hydroelectric turbines slow down as the energy output decreases. As the power dwindles, the glow from the screens of the computers responsible for generating OverSimplified video titles also fades. With limited energy, the algorithm prioritizes essential functions, resulting in fewer nerdy references in the video titles. The room is filled with a subdued hum as the computers work to conserve energy, leading to a decrease in the historical and nerdy puns that usually adorn the video titles.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: In a dimly lit room in Algeria, the hydroelectric turbines slow down as the energy output decreases. As the power dwindles, the glow from the screens of the computers responsible for generating OverSimplified video titles also fades. With limited energy, the algorithm prioritizes essential functions, resulting in fewer nerdy references in the video titles. The room is filled with a subdued hum as the computers work to conserve energy, leading to a decrease in the historical and nerdy puns that usually adorn the video titles. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: "Generate an image of a dimly lit room in Algeria, with hydroelectric turbines slowing down as the energy output decreases. In the foreground, computers responsible for generating video titles are depicted, their screens fading as the power dwindles. The algorithm prioritizes essential functions in the limited energy, resulting in fewer nerdy references in the video titles. The subdued hum of the computers conserving energy is felt throughout the room. The image should capture the futuristic aspects of the setting, such as advanced computer technology and the integration of hydroelectric power."

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in How nerdy OverSimplified YouTube video titles are caused Hydopower energy generated in Algeria to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Power Plays and Nerdy Ways: The Correlation Between OverSimplified YouTube Video Titles and Hydropower Energy in Algeria

The Journal of Comedic Energy Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy OverSimplified YouTube video titles are and Hydopower energy generated in Algeria. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9443166 and p < 0.01 for 2016 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Power Plays and Nerdy Ways: The Correlation Between OverSimplified YouTube Video Titles and Hydropower Energy in Algeria"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we enlighten the scholarly world with the whimsical twist of our findings that tie the nerdy world of OverSimplified YouTube video titles to the abundant energy source of hydropower in Algeria. While it may seem like a far-fetched connection, our empirical investigation has uncovered a surprising correlation between the nerdy allure of video titles and the staggering energy potential of hydropower in Algeria. Through the meticulous analysis of data from artificial intelligence, coupled with information from the Energy Information Administration, we reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9443166 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2016 to 2021. Our results not only entertain with their unexpected connection but also provide valuable insights into the intricate interplay between quirky online culture and pivotal energy sources. Get ready to embark on a scholarly journey that blends the nerdy with the powerful, and uncovers the nerdy secrets behind hydroelectric energy production in a manner that is both informative and delightfully nerdy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy OverSimplified YouTube video titles are and Hydopower energy generated in Algeria. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Power Plays and Nerdy Ways: The Correlation Between OverSimplified YouTube Video Titles and Hydropower Energy in Algeria"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we enlighten the scholarly world with the whimsical twist of our findings that tie the nerdy world of OverSimplified YouTube video titles to the abundant energy source of hydropower in Algeria. While it may seem like a far-fetched connection, our empirical investigation has uncovered a surprising correlation between the nerdy allure of video titles and the staggering energy potential of hydropower in Algeria. Through the meticulous analysis of data from artificial intelligence, coupled with information from the Energy Information Administration, we reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9443166 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2016 to 2021. Our results not only entertain with their unexpected connection but also provide valuable insights into the intricate interplay between quirky online culture and pivotal energy sources. Get ready to embark on a scholarly journey that blends the nerdy with the powerful, and uncovers the nerdy secrets behind hydroelectric energy production in a manner that is both informative and delightfully nerdy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Ah, the intersection of nerdy YouTube video titles and the majestic world of hydropower energy - a combination that would make both historians and engineers scratch their heads in bewilderment. But fear not, dear reader, for we are about to embark on a scholarly journey that promises to be as illuminating as it is entertaining. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar correlation between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and the generation of hydropower energy in the North African region, particularly focusing on the captivating landscape of Algeria.

The realm of YouTube is a treasure trove of eclectic content, ranging from the bizarre to the brilliant, and nowhere else is this more evident than in the quirky titles that creators bestow upon their videos. Meanwhile, hydropower represents a vital component of the renewable energy sector, harnessing the force of flowing water to produce electricity. These seemingly disparate realms come together in our study, shedding light on an unexpected relationship that transcends conventional scholarly boundaries.

Now, you might be thinking, "What on earth do nerdy video titles have to do with hydropower generation in Algeria?" And to that, I say, "Prepare to be pleasantly surprised!" Our research undertakes an unorthodox approach, combining quantitative analysis with a dash of whimsy to unravel the enigmatic connections hidden within the fabric of digital pop culture and sustainable energy practices. As we navigate through the data-intensive landscape, brace yourself for an odyssey that promises to be both enlightening and, dare I say, nerdy to the core.

So, join us as we navigate the nerdy labyrinth of YouTube titles and the rushing currents of hydropower, uncovering correlations that are as unexpected as they are utterly captivating. It's time to dive headfirst into a realm where puns flow as freely as water and where the power of knowledge meets the allure of internet culture. Let's embark on this scholarly escapade with equal parts curiosity and merriment, because, after all, where's the fun in research without a touch of whimsy?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy OverSimplified YouTube video titles are and Hydopower energy generated in Algeria. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Power Plays and Nerdy Ways: The Correlation Between OverSimplified YouTube Video Titles and Hydropower Energy in Algeria"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we enlighten the scholarly world with the whimsical twist of our findings that tie the nerdy world of OverSimplified YouTube video titles to the abundant energy source of hydropower in Algeria. While it may seem like a far-fetched connection, our empirical investigation has uncovered a surprising correlation between the nerdy allure of video titles and the staggering energy potential of hydropower in Algeria. Through the meticulous analysis of data from artificial intelligence, coupled with information from the Energy Information Administration, we reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9443166 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2016 to 2021. Our results not only entertain with their unexpected connection but also provide valuable insights into the intricate interplay between quirky online culture and pivotal energy sources. Get ready to embark on a scholarly journey that blends the nerdy with the powerful, and uncovers the nerdy secrets behind hydroelectric energy production in a manner that is both informative and delightfully nerdy.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the intersection of nerdy YouTube video titles and the majestic world of hydropower energy - a combination that would make both historians and engineers scratch their heads in bewilderment. But fear not, dear reader, for we are about to embark on a scholarly journey that promises to be as illuminating as it is entertaining. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar correlation between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and the generation of hydropower energy in the North African region, particularly focusing on the captivating landscape of Algeria.
The realm of YouTube is a treasure trove of eclectic content, ranging from the bizarre to the brilliant, and nowhere else is this more evident than in the quirky titles that creators bestow upon their videos. Meanwhile, hydropower represents a vital component of the renewable energy sector, harnessing the force of flowing water to produce electricity. These seemingly disparate realms come together in our study, shedding light on an unexpected relationship that transcends conventional scholarly boundaries.
Now, you might be thinking, "What on earth do nerdy video titles have to do with hydropower generation in Algeria?" And to that, I say, "Prepare to be pleasantly surprised!" Our research undertakes an unorthodox approach, combining quantitative analysis with a dash of whimsy to unravel the enigmatic connections hidden within the fabric of digital pop culture and sustainable energy practices. As we navigate through the data-intensive landscape, brace yourself for an odyssey that promises to be both enlightening and, dare I say, nerdy to the core.
So, join us as we navigate the nerdy labyrinth of YouTube titles and the rushing currents of hydropower, uncovering correlations that are as unexpected as they are utterly captivating. It's time to dive headfirst into a realm where puns flow as freely as water and where the power of knowledge meets the allure of internet culture. Let's embark on this scholarly escapade with equal parts curiosity and merriment, because, after all, where's the fun in research without a touch of whimsy?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The scholarly exploration of the correlation between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and hydropower energy in Algeria has been a journey teeming with surprises and revelations. The investigation commences with seminal works such as Smith's "Evaluating Nerdy Linguistics: A Quantitative Analysis of YouTube Video Titles" and Doe's "Hydropower Dynamics in Transcontinental Contexts: From Theory to Practice," which lay the foundation for understanding the intricate interplay between digital culture and sustainable energy practices. Smith delves into the linguistic nuances of YouTube video titles, dissecting their nerdy appeal with precision, while Doe uncovers the complexities of hydropower dynamics, painting a comprehensive picture of its significance in diverse geographical settings.

Building upon this scholarly groundwork, Jones' "Nerding Out: A Sociolinguistic Perspective on YouTube Title Trends" offers a nuanced examination of the evolving linguistics within the digital sphere, shedding light on the subtle yet intriguing patterns that underpin the appeal of nerdy video titles. Additionally, Peterson's "Powering the Future: Exploring Renewable Energy Sources" underscores the pivotal role of hydropower in the renewable energy landscape, presenting a comprehensive overview of its technological advancements and global significance.

While these scholarly works provide a solid foundation for our exploration, it is also essential to consider non-fiction literature that captures the essence of nerdy culture and hydrological marvels. "How to Speak Nerdy: A Linguistic Guide to Internet Subcultures" by Linguist Lumos offers a delightful foray into the lexicon of nerdiness, equipping readers with the necessary linguistic toolkit to navigate the quirky world of YouTube video titles. On the other hand, "Rivers and Reservoirs: Engineering Wonders" by Hydrographer H. A. Waters beckons readers into the realm of hydrological wonders, exploring the awe-inspiring potential of water as an energy source.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, we encounter intriguing titles that, although unrelated to scholarly discourse, beckon with their alluring blend of whimsy and energy. From "The Electric Compendium of Quirky Quests" by Storyteller S. Watts to "Nerdy Nights and Hydro Adventures" by Wordsmith W. Flow, these fictional works invite us to embrace the playful fusion of nerdy escapades and hydroelectric wonders, infusing our scholarly journey with a touch of imaginative delight.

In the pursuit of a deeper understanding, the authors have immersively dived into related TV shows, conducting rigorous "research" in the name of scholarly inquiry. The investigative journey led to the discovery of TV shows that, at first glance, may seem unrelated to our scholarly endeavors but hold hidden connections. "Stranger Things" is not just a thrilling sci-fi series, but also an apt metaphor for the unexpected correlations we uncover in our study. Similarly, "The Big Bang Theory" serves as a playful nod to the nerdy undercurrents that permeate our analysis, reminding us that even the most unconventional of connections can yield remarkable insights.

As we traverse this scholarly landscape, let us embrace the playful synergy between nerdy YouTube titles and the boundless potential of hydropower energy, for it is in this quirky confluence that we find an unexpected tapestry of correlation and amusement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy OverSimplified YouTube video titles are and Hydopower energy generated in Algeria. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2016 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Power Plays and Nerdy Ways: The Correlation Between OverSimplified YouTube Video Titles and Hydropower Energy in Algeria"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we enlighten the scholarly world with the whimsical twist of our findings that tie the nerdy world of OverSimplified YouTube video titles to the abundant energy source of hydropower in Algeria. While it may seem like a far-fetched connection, our empirical investigation has uncovered a surprising correlation between the nerdy allure of video titles and the staggering energy potential of hydropower in Algeria. Through the meticulous analysis of data from artificial intelligence, coupled with information from the Energy Information Administration, we reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9443166 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2016 to 2021. Our results not only entertain with their unexpected connection but also provide valuable insights into the intricate interplay between quirky online culture and pivotal energy sources. Get ready to embark on a scholarly journey that blends the nerdy with the powerful, and uncovers the nerdy secrets behind hydroelectric energy production in a manner that is both informative and delightfully nerdy.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the intersection of nerdy YouTube video titles and the majestic world of hydropower energy - a combination that would make both historians and engineers scratch their heads in bewilderment. But fear not, dear reader, for we are about to embark on a scholarly journey that promises to be as illuminating as it is entertaining. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar correlation between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and the generation of hydropower energy in the North African region, particularly focusing on the captivating landscape of Algeria.
The realm of YouTube is a treasure trove of eclectic content, ranging from the bizarre to the brilliant, and nowhere else is this more evident than in the quirky titles that creators bestow upon their videos. Meanwhile, hydropower represents a vital component of the renewable energy sector, harnessing the force of flowing water to produce electricity. These seemingly disparate realms come together in our study, shedding light on an unexpected relationship that transcends conventional scholarly boundaries.
Now, you might be thinking, "What on earth do nerdy video titles have to do with hydropower generation in Algeria?" And to that, I say, "Prepare to be pleasantly surprised!" Our research undertakes an unorthodox approach, combining quantitative analysis with a dash of whimsy to unravel the enigmatic connections hidden within the fabric of digital pop culture and sustainable energy practices. As we navigate through the data-intensive landscape, brace yourself for an odyssey that promises to be both enlightening and, dare I say, nerdy to the core.
So, join us as we navigate the nerdy labyrinth of YouTube titles and the rushing currents of hydropower, uncovering correlations that are as unexpected as they are utterly captivating. It's time to dive headfirst into a realm where puns flow as freely as water and where the power of knowledge meets the allure of internet culture. Let's embark on this scholarly escapade with equal parts curiosity and merriment, because, after all, where's the fun in research without a touch of whimsy?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unearth the captivating correlation between the nerdy charm of OverSimplified YouTube video titles and the robust world of hydropower energy in Algeria, our research team ventured into a whimsical web of data collection and analysis. With a touch of flair and a generous sprinkle of rigor, we crafted an approach that defies convention and embraces the unexpected, all in the pursuit of scholarly enlightenment (and a fair bit of nerdy amusement).

First and foremost, our data collection process involved harnessing the power of artificial intelligence (AI) to trawl through a vast expanse of YouTube video titles from the popular OverSimplified channel. Through advanced natural language processing algorithms, we meticulously categorized and quantified the nerdiness level of each video title, employing a scale that ranged from "mild geekiness" to "unabashedly nerdy" (complete with a side note on the borderline cringe-inducing titles that straddled the fine line between nerdy charm and utter dorkiness).

Simultaneously, we delved into the realm of energy data, drawing upon the comprehensive insights provided by the Energy Information Administration. Here, we navigated through a trove of statistics, charts, and reports, embarking on a quest to uncover the intricate patterns and fluctuations in hydropower energy generation in the enigmatic landscape of Algeria. With an eye for detail and a healthy dose of statistical prowess, we meticulously charted the ebbs and flows of hydropower production, seeking to unveil the hidden dynamics that underpin this vital energy source.

Once our arsenal of data was assembled, we employed a series of sophisticated statistical analyses that were as exacting as they were whimsical. From cross-correlation techniques to time series modeling, we waltzed through the statistical landscape with a dance of data points, aiming to tease out the mesmerizing relationship between nerdy video titles and hydropower energy generation. Our toolkit of statistical methods was decked with a touch of scholarly humor, with an occasional nod to the whimsy that infused our research journey.

Furthermore, we leveraged the temporal dimension of our data, traversing through the years from 2016 to 2021 with an intrepid spirit of exploration. This temporal sweep allowed us to capture the undulating rhythms of nerdy trends in video titles and the surging tides of hydropower output, painting a dynamic portrait of their entwined trajectories over time.

As we waded through the depths of data analysis, we remained ever mindful of the potential confounding variables that might lurk in the shadows. Our quest to unravel the correlation between nerdy video titles and hydropower energy production entailed a vigilant scrutiny of external factors that could cast a shadow of doubt on our findings. Whether it was the whims of internet culture or the capricious shifts in energy policies, we stood poised to confront these lurking variables with the valor of scholarly inquiry and, perhaps, a subtle dash of whimsical flair.

In summary, our methodology embodied the spirit of scholarly inquiry laced with a hint of nerdy exuberance, culminating in an approach that defied convention and embraced the unexpected. With the full force of data analytics and statistical wizardry at our disposal, we set forth on an odyssey that promised to unveil the quirky connection between nerdy OverSimplified video titles and the resounding power of hydropower energy in Algeria. So, buckle up and prepare for a scholarly ride that meanders through the whimsical and the rigorous, because, after all, where else can you find a crossroads of nerdiness and hydropower if not in the whimsical world of research?



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy OverSimplified YouTube video titles are and Hydopower energy generated in Algeria. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2016 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9443166, r-squared of 0.8917339, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Power Plays and Nerdy Ways: The Correlation Between OverSimplified YouTube Video Titles and Hydropower Energy in Algeria"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we enlighten the scholarly world with the whimsical twist of our findings that tie the nerdy world of OverSimplified YouTube video titles to the abundant energy source of hydropower in Algeria. While it may seem like a far-fetched connection, our empirical investigation has uncovered a surprising correlation between the nerdy allure of video titles and the staggering energy potential of hydropower in Algeria. Through the meticulous analysis of data from artificial intelligence, coupled with information from the Energy Information Administration, we reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9443166 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2016 to 2021. Our results not only entertain with their unexpected connection but also provide valuable insights into the intricate interplay between quirky online culture and pivotal energy sources. Get ready to embark on a scholarly journey that blends the nerdy with the powerful, and uncovers the nerdy secrets behind hydroelectric energy production in a manner that is both informative and delightfully nerdy.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ah, the intersection of nerdy YouTube video titles and the majestic world of hydropower energy - a combination that would make both historians and engineers scratch their heads in bewilderment. But fear not, dear reader, for we are about to embark on a scholarly journey that promises to be as illuminating as it is entertaining. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar correlation between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and the generation of hydropower energy in the North African region, particularly focusing on the captivating landscape of Algeria.
The realm of YouTube is a treasure trove of eclectic content, ranging from the bizarre to the brilliant, and nowhere else is this more evident than in the quirky titles that creators bestow upon their videos. Meanwhile, hydropower represents a vital component of the renewable energy sector, harnessing the force of flowing water to produce electricity. These seemingly disparate realms come together in our study, shedding light on an unexpected relationship that transcends conventional scholarly boundaries.
Now, you might be thinking, "What on earth do nerdy video titles have to do with hydropower generation in Algeria?" And to that, I say, "Prepare to be pleasantly surprised!" Our research undertakes an unorthodox approach, combining quantitative analysis with a dash of whimsy to unravel the enigmatic connections hidden within the fabric of digital pop culture and sustainable energy practices. As we navigate through the data-intensive landscape, brace yourself for an odyssey that promises to be both enlightening and, dare I say, nerdy to the core.
So, join us as we navigate the nerdy labyrinth of YouTube titles and the rushing currents of hydropower, uncovering correlations that are as unexpected as they are utterly captivating. It's time to dive headfirst into a realm where puns flow as freely as water and where the power of knowledge meets the allure of internet culture. Let's embark on this scholarly escapade with equal parts curiosity and merriment, because, after all, where's the fun in research without a touch of whimsy?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon delving into the realm of data analysis, we were met with a spectacle that could only be described as a fusion of intellectual intrigue and nerdy delight. Our investigation into the correlation between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and the generation of hydropower energy in Algeria yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9443166, an r-squared value of 0.8917339, and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2016 to 2021. This statistical evidence left us gleefully surprised, much like stumbling upon a hidden Easter egg in a video game.

The sheer strength of the correlation was marvelously displayed in the form of a scatterplot, gloriously depicted in Fig. 1. Behold the scatterplot, where each data point is a testament to the symbiotic relationship between the whimsical world of OverSimplified video titles and the astonishing energy potential of hydropower in Algeria. It's as if statistical analysis and nerdy YouTube content collided in a nerdtastic explosion of correlation.

Now, if our findings were a YouTube video, they would undoubtedly be titled, "The SHOCKING Connection Between Nerdy Titles and Hydroelectric Power?! You Won't BELIEVE What We Found!" Oh, the allure of clickbait titles – how tempting it is to succumb to the captivating power of sensationalism!

In conclusion, our results not only underscore the unexpected correlation between online nerdiness and real-world energy generation but also pave the way for a scholarly dialogue that embraces the quirky side of data analysis. It's remarkable how a seemingly trivial aspect of internet culture can unveil insights into the monumental domain of renewable energy. Let us cherish this delightful intersection of nerdy fascination and sustainable power as we move forward, for it is in these unconventional correlations that we uncover unexpected marvels.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy OverSimplified YouTube video titles are and Hydopower energy generated in Algeria. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Power Plays and Nerdy Ways: The Correlation Between OverSimplified YouTube Video Titles and Hydropower Energy in Algeria"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we enlighten the scholarly world with the whimsical twist of our findings that tie the nerdy world of OverSimplified YouTube video titles to the abundant energy source of hydropower in Algeria. While it may seem like a far-fetched connection, our empirical investigation has uncovered a surprising correlation between the nerdy allure of video titles and the staggering energy potential of hydropower in Algeria. Through the meticulous analysis of data from artificial intelligence, coupled with information from the Energy Information Administration, we reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9443166 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2016 to 2021. Our results not only entertain with their unexpected connection but also provide valuable insights into the intricate interplay between quirky online culture and pivotal energy sources. Get ready to embark on a scholarly journey that blends the nerdy with the powerful, and uncovers the nerdy secrets behind hydroelectric energy production in a manner that is both informative and delightfully nerdy.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The scholarly exploration of the correlation between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and hydropower energy in Algeria has been a journey teeming with surprises and revelations. The investigation commences with seminal works such as Smith's "Evaluating Nerdy Linguistics: A Quantitative Analysis of YouTube Video Titles" and Doe's "Hydropower Dynamics in Transcontinental Contexts: From Theory to Practice," which lay the foundation for understanding the intricate interplay between digital culture and sustainable energy practices. Smith delves into the linguistic nuances of YouTube video titles, dissecting their nerdy appeal with precision, while Doe uncovers the complexities of hydropower dynamics, painting a comprehensive picture of its significance in diverse geographical settings.
Building upon this scholarly groundwork, Jones' "Nerding Out: A Sociolinguistic Perspective on YouTube Title Trends" offers a nuanced examination of the evolving linguistics within the digital sphere, shedding light on the subtle yet intriguing patterns that underpin the appeal of nerdy video titles. Additionally, Peterson's "Powering the Future: Exploring Renewable Energy Sources" underscores the pivotal role of hydropower in the renewable energy landscape, presenting a comprehensive overview of its technological advancements and global significance.
While these scholarly works provide a solid foundation for our exploration, it is also essential to consider non-fiction literature that captures the essence of nerdy culture and hydrological marvels. "How to Speak Nerdy: A Linguistic Guide to Internet Subcultures" by Linguist Lumos offers a delightful foray into the lexicon of nerdiness, equipping readers with the necessary linguistic toolkit to navigate the quirky world of YouTube video titles. On the other hand, "Rivers and Reservoirs: Engineering Wonders" by Hydrographer H. A. Waters beckons readers into the realm of hydrological wonders, exploring the awe-inspiring potential of water as an energy source.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, we encounter intriguing titles that, although unrelated to scholarly discourse, beckon with their alluring blend of whimsy and energy. From "The Electric Compendium of Quirky Quests" by Storyteller S. Watts to "Nerdy Nights and Hydro Adventures" by Wordsmith W. Flow, these fictional works invite us to embrace the playful fusion of nerdy escapades and hydroelectric wonders, infusing our scholarly journey with a touch of imaginative delight.
In the pursuit of a deeper understanding, the authors have immersively dived into related TV shows, conducting rigorous "research" in the name of scholarly inquiry. The investigative journey led to the discovery of TV shows that, at first glance, may seem unrelated to our scholarly endeavors but hold hidden connections. "Stranger Things" is not just a thrilling sci-fi series, but also an apt metaphor for the unexpected correlations we uncover in our study. Similarly, "The Big Bang Theory" serves as a playful nod to the nerdy undercurrents that permeate our analysis, reminding us that even the most unconventional of connections can yield remarkable insights.
As we traverse this scholarly landscape, let us embrace the playful synergy between nerdy YouTube titles and the boundless potential of hydropower energy, for it is in this quirky confluence that we find an unexpected tapestry of correlation and amusement.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon delving into the realm of data analysis, we were met with a spectacle that could only be described as a fusion of intellectual intrigue and nerdy delight. Our investigation into the correlation between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and the generation of hydropower energy in Algeria yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9443166, an r-squared value of 0.8917339, and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2016 to 2021. This statistical evidence left us gleefully surprised, much like stumbling upon a hidden Easter egg in a video game.
The sheer strength of the correlation was marvelously displayed in the form of a scatterplot, gloriously depicted in Fig. 1. Behold the scatterplot, where each data point is a testament to the symbiotic relationship between the whimsical world of OverSimplified video titles and the astonishing energy potential of hydropower in Algeria. It's as if statistical analysis and nerdy YouTube content collided in a nerdtastic explosion of correlation.
Now, if our findings were a YouTube video, they would undoubtedly be titled, "The SHOCKING Connection Between Nerdy Titles and Hydroelectric Power?! You Won't BELIEVE What We Found!" Oh, the allure of clickbait titles – how tempting it is to succumb to the captivating power of sensationalism!
In conclusion, our results not only underscore the unexpected correlation between online nerdiness and real-world energy generation but also pave the way for a scholarly dialogue that embraces the quirky side of data analysis. It's remarkable how a seemingly trivial aspect of internet culture can unveil insights into the monumental domain of renewable energy. Let us cherish this delightful intersection of nerdy fascination and sustainable power as we move forward, for it is in these unconventional correlations that we uncover unexpected marvels.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings provide a whimsical yet compelling insight into the elusive connection between the nerdy allure of OverSimplified YouTube video titles and the formidable energy potential of hydropower in Algeria. While on the surface, the correlation may seem as unexpected as finding a treasure chest in an online game filled with nerdy references, our empirical evidence aligns with prior research and sheds light on intriguing patterns.

Drawing from the quirky landscape of scholarly exploration, we recall Jones' "Nerding Out: A Sociolinguistic Perspective on YouTube Title Trends," which illuminated the evolving linguistics within the digital sphere. Our results align with Jones' intricate examination, substantiating the significance of nerdy linguistic patterns and their correlation with tangible phenomena such as hydropower energy generation. This alignment serves as a testament to the invaluable nature of nerdy linguistic analysis, not only for its entertainment value but also for its potential to unveil unexpected correlations.

Moreover, our findings resonate with the comprehensive overview presented in Peterson's "Powering the Future: Exploring Renewable Energy Sources." By showcasing a substantial correlation coefficient, we reaffirm the pivotal role of hydropower in the renewable energy landscape. The unexpected intersection of nerdy YouTube titles and sustainable energy practices not only captivates the imagination but also underscores the potential for unconventional sources of insight in the realm of renewable energy research.

Venturing beyond the confines of scholarly literature, the fictional works identified in our literature review serve as an unexpected yet fascinating backdrop for our findings. The playful fusion of nerdy escapades and hydroelectric wonders in titles such as "Nerdy Nights and Hydro Adventures" by Wordsmith W. Flow takes on a new layer of significance as our results unveil the tangible correlation between these seemingly disparate realms. Indeed, the unexpected convergence of nerdy culture and hydrological marvels opens avenues for imaginative explorations within the scholarly discourse.

As we revel in the delightfully nerdy correlation uncovered in our study, it is clear that the interplay between digital culture and tangible phenomena holds immense potential for further scholarly inquiry. Our results not only assert a correlation but also beckon researchers to delve deeper into the nuanced undercurrents of online culture and their intersection with real-world phenomena. In doing so, we may uncover unexpected connections that fuel both intellectual intrigue and nerdy amusement, elevating the scholarly landscape to new heights of discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy OverSimplified YouTube video titles are and Hydopower energy generated in Algeria. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Power Plays and Nerdy Ways: The Correlation Between OverSimplified YouTube Video Titles and Hydropower Energy in Algeria"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we enlighten the scholarly world with the whimsical twist of our findings that tie the nerdy world of OverSimplified YouTube video titles to the abundant energy source of hydropower in Algeria. While it may seem like a far-fetched connection, our empirical investigation has uncovered a surprising correlation between the nerdy allure of video titles and the staggering energy potential of hydropower in Algeria. Through the meticulous analysis of data from artificial intelligence, coupled with information from the Energy Information Administration, we reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9443166 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2016 to 2021. Our results not only entertain with their unexpected connection but also provide valuable insights into the intricate interplay between quirky online culture and pivotal energy sources. Get ready to embark on a scholarly journey that blends the nerdy with the powerful, and uncovers the nerdy secrets behind hydroelectric energy production in a manner that is both informative and delightfully nerdy.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ah, the intersection of nerdy YouTube video titles and the majestic world of hydropower energy - a combination that would make both historians and engineers scratch their heads in bewilderment. But fear not, dear reader, for we are about to embark on a scholarly journey that promises to be as illuminating as it is entertaining. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar correlation between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and the generation of hydropower energy in the North African region, particularly focusing on the captivating landscape of Algeria.
The realm of YouTube is a treasure trove of eclectic content, ranging from the bizarre to the brilliant, and nowhere else is this more evident than in the quirky titles that creators bestow upon their videos. Meanwhile, hydropower represents a vital component of the renewable energy sector, harnessing the force of flowing water to produce electricity. These seemingly disparate realms come together in our study, shedding light on an unexpected relationship that transcends conventional scholarly boundaries.
Now, you might be thinking, "What on earth do nerdy video titles have to do with hydropower generation in Algeria?" And to that, I say, "Prepare to be pleasantly surprised!" Our research undertakes an unorthodox approach, combining quantitative analysis with a dash of whimsy to unravel the enigmatic connections hidden within the fabric of digital pop culture and sustainable energy practices. As we navigate through the data-intensive landscape, brace yourself for an odyssey that promises to be both enlightening and, dare I say, nerdy to the core.
So, join us as we navigate the nerdy labyrinth of YouTube titles and the rushing currents of hydropower, uncovering correlations that are as unexpected as they are utterly captivating. It's time to dive headfirst into a realm where puns flow as freely as water and where the power of knowledge meets the allure of internet culture. Let's embark on this scholarly escapade with equal parts curiosity and merriment, because, after all, where's the fun in research without a touch of whimsy?

[[RESULTS]]
Upon delving into the realm of data analysis, we were met with a spectacle that could only be described as a fusion of intellectual intrigue and nerdy delight. Our investigation into the correlation between OverSimplified YouTube video titles and the generation of hydropower energy in Algeria yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9443166, an r-squared value of 0.8917339, and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2016 to 2021. This statistical evidence left us gleefully surprised, much like stumbling upon a hidden Easter egg in a video game.
The sheer strength of the correlation was marvelously displayed in the form of a scatterplot, gloriously depicted in Fig. 1. Behold the scatterplot, where each data point is a testament to the symbiotic relationship between the whimsical world of OverSimplified video titles and the astonishing energy potential of hydropower in Algeria. It's as if statistical analysis and nerdy YouTube content collided in a nerdtastic explosion of correlation.
Now, if our findings were a YouTube video, they would undoubtedly be titled, "The SHOCKING Connection Between Nerdy Titles and Hydroelectric Power?! You Won't BELIEVE What We Found!" Oh, the allure of clickbait titles – how tempting it is to succumb to the captivating power of sensationalism!
In conclusion, our results not only underscore the unexpected correlation between online nerdiness and real-world energy generation but also pave the way for a scholarly dialogue that embraces the quirky side of data analysis. It's remarkable how a seemingly trivial aspect of internet culture can unveil insights into the monumental domain of renewable energy. Let us cherish this delightful intersection of nerdy fascination and sustainable power as we move forward, for it is in these unconventional correlations that we uncover unexpected marvels.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In wrapping up our scholarly expedition into the interwoven realms of YouTube eccentricity and hydraulic prowess, we find ourselves marveling at the whimsical correlation we have brought to light. Who would have thought that the nerdy allure of OverSimplified YouTube video titles could hold such sway over the mighty force of hydropower in Algeria? It's as if the digital musings of history and the rhythmic flow of water have decided to do a merry dance of correlation, much like an unexpected duet in a musical.
Our findings not only entertain with their unconventional connection but also gently nudge the scholarly world to embrace the quirky and unexpected in our pursuit of knowledge. As we look toward the horizon of future research, we are left with a sense of awe and a healthy dose of nerdy glee at the intersection where YouTube clickbait meets hydroelectric power. It's a place where the power of puns and the energy potential of rivers converge in a comical yet enlightening ballet of correlation.
In the grand finale of our academic performance, we confidently assert that no further research is needed in this specific area. For upon the resplendent stage of correlation, we have unveiled a spectacle that defies traditional expectations and invites us to indulge in the wonder of unexpected connections. So, let us bid farewell to this nerdy escapade with a knowing smirk and a twinkle in our eye, for in the world of scholarly exploration, who says one cannot mix a bit of whimsy with the pursuit of knowledge?

No more research needed!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Power Plays and Nerdy Ways: The Correlation Between OverSimplified YouTube Video Titles and Hydropower Energy in Algeria. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Comedic Energy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Power Plays and Nerdy Ways: The Correlation Between OverSimplified YouTube Video Titles and Hydropower Energy in Algeria. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Zany Energy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Power Plays and Nerdy Ways: The Correlation Between OverSimplified YouTube Video Titles and Hydropower Energy in Algeria with an abstract of In this research paper, we enlighten the scholarly world with the whimsical twist of our findings that tie the nerdy world of OverSimplified YouTube video titles to the abundant energy source of hydropower in Algeria. While it may seem like a far-fetched connection, our empirical investigation has uncovered a surprising correlation between the nerdy allure of video titles and the staggering energy potential of hydropower in Algeria. Through the meticulous analysis of data from artificial intelligence, coupled with information from the Energy Information Administration, we reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9443166 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2016 to 2021. Our results not only entertain with their unexpected connection but also provide valuable insights into the intricate interplay between quirky online culture and pivotal energy sources. Get ready to embark on a scholarly journey that blends the nerdy with the powerful, and uncovers the nerdy secrets behind hydroelectric energy production in a manner that is both informative and delightfully nerdy.

ChatGPT:

OverSimplified YouTube, Video titles, Hydropower energy, Algeria, Correlation, Empirical investigation, Data analysis, Artificial intelligence, Energy Information Administration, Correlation coefficient, P-value, 2016-2021, Quirky online culture, Energy sources, Hydroelectric energy production

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How nerdy OverSimplified YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How nerdy OverSimplified YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How nerdy OverSimplified YouTube video titles are

Hydopower energy generated in Algeria
Detailed data title: Total hydopower energy generated in Algeria in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Hydopower energy generated in Algeria

Correlation r = 0.9443166 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8917339 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 89.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hydopower energy generated in Algeria) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How nerdy OverSimplified YouTube video titles are) over the 6 years from 2016 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0046. 0.0045646319870833190000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 0.46% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 219 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.57, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201620172018201920202021
How nerdy OverSimplified YouTube video titles are (Nerdiness score)7.55.256.56.16674.66675.6667
Hydopower energy generated in Algeria (Billion kWh)0.215820.055440.115830.1520.050.09




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7.5,5.25,6.5,6.1667,4.6667,5.6667,])
array_2 = np.array([0.21582,0.05544,0.11583,0.152,0.05,0.09,])
array_1_name = "How nerdy OverSimplified YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Hydopower energy generated in Algeria"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 4801 · Black Variable ID: 25629 · Red Variable ID: 23449
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0