about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,757 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the second variable is The number of materials engineers in Missouri.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos increase, so does the number of materials engineers in Missouri. This is because the captivating content somehow sparks an interest in materials engineering. Perhaps viewers are drawn to the channel's attention to detail, and it ignites a passion for understanding the properties of various substances. Alternatively, it could be that LEMMiNO's videos are so engaging that they literally inspire people to take a closer look at the materials around them, prompting a sudden surge in the materials engineering workforce.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image inspired by the scene with the following style - a humorous meme-style image you would see on Reddit. Description: Visualize a bustling cityscape with the YouTube Analytics graph prominently displayed, showing the Average views of LEMMiNO's videos steadily rising. Nearby, depict a group of individuals engrossed in examining various materials under a microscope with palpable focus and enthusiasm. The scene should capture their meticulous study of substances, reflecting the inquisitive nature of the captivating content. The two scenes should seamlessly depict the interplay between the increasing Average views of LEMMiNO's YouTube videos and the growing number of materials engineers in Missouri, as the captivating content inspires a newfound interest in the world of materials engineering. Clarification: The depiction should be simple and not include any words or speech bubbles. Embellish the cityscape with lively and diverse characters to infuse the image with a humorous and relatable quality reminiscent of a meme-style post on Reddit. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and The number of materials engineers in Missouri. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Data cyber art Celtic art Cute 2D animation Photorealism a funny image you would see on reddit
ChatGPT: a funny image you would see on reddit

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and The number of materials engineers in Missouri, in the following situation: As Average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos increase, so does the number of materials engineers in Missouri. This is because the captivating content somehow sparks an interest in materials engineering. Perhaps viewers are drawn to the channel's attention to detail, and it ignites a passion for understanding the properties of various substances. Alternatively, it could be that LEMMiNO's videos are so engaging that they literally inspire people to take a closer look at the materials around them, prompting a sudden surge in the materials engineering workforce.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling cityscape, the YouTube Analytics graph displaying the Average views of LEMMiNO's videos steadily rises, while nearby, a group of individuals can be seen engrossed in examining various materials under a microscope. Their focus and enthusiasm are palpable as they meticulously study the properties of substances, mirroring the inquisitive nature of the captivating content. The two scenes together depict the interplay between the increasing Average views of LEMMiNO's YouTube videos and the growing number of materials engineers in Missouri, as the captivating content inspires a newfound interest in the world of materials engineering.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling cityscape, the YouTube Analytics graph displaying the Average views of LEMMiNO's videos steadily rises, while nearby, a group of individuals can be seen engrossed in examining various materials under a microscope. Their focus and enthusiasm are palpable as they meticulously study the properties of substances, mirroring the inquisitive nature of the captivating content. The two scenes together depict the interplay between the increasing Average views of LEMMiNO's YouTube videos and the growing number of materials engineers in Missouri, as the captivating content inspires a newfound interest in the world of materials engineering. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image inspired by the scene with the following style - a humorous meme-style image you would see on Reddit. Description: Visualize a bustling cityscape with the YouTube Analytics graph prominently displayed, showing the Average views of LEMMiNO's videos steadily rising. Nearby, depict a group of individuals engrossed in examining various materials under a microscope with palpable focus and enthusiasm. The scene should capture their meticulous study of substances, reflecting the inquisitive nature of the captivating content. The two scenes should seamlessly depict the interplay between the increasing Average views of LEMMiNO's YouTube videos and the growing number of materials engineers in Missouri, as the captivating content inspires a newfound interest in the world of materials engineering. Clarification: The depiction should be simple and not include any words or speech bubbles. Embellish the cityscape with lively and diverse characters to infuse the image with a humorous and relatable quality reminiscent of a meme-style post on Reddit.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos caused The number of materials engineers in Missouri to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Turning Views into Materials: A Correlational Analysis of LEMMiNO YouTube Video Popularity and Materials Engineers in Missouri

The Journal of Innovative Materials Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and The number of materials engineers in Missouri. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from YouTube and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9624442 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Turning Views into Materials: A Correlational Analysis of LEMMiNO YouTube Video Popularity and Materials Engineers in Missouri"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unusual relationship between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in the state of Missouri. Utilizing data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on this endeavor equipped with a pun in one hand and a statistical analysis in the other. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9624442 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, suggesting a surprisingly strong connection between these variables.

Brace yourself for a dad joke, for we simply cannot resist: "What did the materials engineer say to the LEMMiNO viewer? Let's bond over our shared interests!"

Furthermore, we delve into the implications of our results, discussing the potential influence of popular YouTube content on career choices in engineering, as well as the reciprocal impact of the materials engineering field on the entertainment industry. By shedding light on this unanticipated correlation, our study contributes to the substantiation of the far-reaching and quirky interconnections within our complex world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and The number of materials engineers in Missouri. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Turning Views into Materials: A Correlational Analysis of LEMMiNO YouTube Video Popularity and Materials Engineers in Missouri"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unusual relationship between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in the state of Missouri. Utilizing data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on this endeavor equipped with a pun in one hand and a statistical analysis in the other. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9624442 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, suggesting a surprisingly strong connection between these variables.

Brace yourself for a dad joke, for we simply cannot resist: "What did the materials engineer say to the LEMMiNO viewer? Let's bond over our shared interests!"

Furthermore, we delve into the implications of our results, discussing the potential influence of popular YouTube content on career choices in engineering, as well as the reciprocal impact of the materials engineering field on the entertainment industry. By shedding light on this unanticipated correlation, our study contributes to the substantiation of the far-reaching and quirky interconnections within our complex world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The enchanting world of online video content has captivated audiences worldwide, rendering itself a dominant force in shaping cultural phenomena and societal trends. Meanwhile, the field of materials engineering stands as a cornerstone of innovation, leveraging scientific principles to design and develop the materials that form the foundation of modern civilization. As we embark upon the exploration of the correlation between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in Missouri, we embark with the determination of a researcher and the pun-derful wit of a father.

Pardon the interruption, but here comes another one: "Why did the materials engineer bring a pencil to the YouTube studio? To draw the viewers' attention, of course!"

Our study sets out to dissect the unexpected alignment between these seemingly disparate variables, offering a fresh perspective on the interconnectedness of digital media and professional career paths. With a statistical lens aimed at uncovering hidden patterns, we aim to embrace the curious confluence of viewer engagement and employment landscapes.

We approach this investigation armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and a stash of LEMMiNO's intellectually stimulating content, exhibiting a fervent dedication to unearthing correlations with an enthusiasm that rivals a scientist's love for a new experiment. With our gaze fixed upon the code of the correlation coefficient, we endeavor to decipher the cryptic messages embedded within this marvelous statistical enchantment.

But wait, here's a jest for the statistically inclined: "Why don't researchers trust atoms? Because they make up everything, including statistical anomalies!"

As we navigate the labyrinth of data points and regression analyses, our intent is to not only unravel the tangled yarn of numerical relationships but also to appreciate the serendipitous nature of statistical discoveries. Each data point contributes to the grand tapestry of knowledge, weaving together a narrative that captures the elusive essence of correlation and causation.

With a nod to the unexpected paths of inquiry, we inaugurate our foray into the realm of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and materials engineering, where each click and calculation beckons us closer to the convergence of science and amusement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and The number of materials engineers in Missouri. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Turning Views into Materials: A Correlational Analysis of LEMMiNO YouTube Video Popularity and Materials Engineers in Missouri"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unusual relationship between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in the state of Missouri. Utilizing data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on this endeavor equipped with a pun in one hand and a statistical analysis in the other. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9624442 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, suggesting a surprisingly strong connection between these variables.

Brace yourself for a dad joke, for we simply cannot resist: "What did the materials engineer say to the LEMMiNO viewer? Let's bond over our shared interests!"

Furthermore, we delve into the implications of our results, discussing the potential influence of popular YouTube content on career choices in engineering, as well as the reciprocal impact of the materials engineering field on the entertainment industry. By shedding light on this unanticipated correlation, our study contributes to the substantiation of the far-reaching and quirky interconnections within our complex world.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enchanting world of online video content has captivated audiences worldwide, rendering itself a dominant force in shaping cultural phenomena and societal trends. Meanwhile, the field of materials engineering stands as a cornerstone of innovation, leveraging scientific principles to design and develop the materials that form the foundation of modern civilization. As we embark upon the exploration of the correlation between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in Missouri, we embark with the determination of a researcher and the pun-derful wit of a father.
Pardon the interruption, but here comes another one: "Why did the materials engineer bring a pencil to the YouTube studio? To draw the viewers' attention, of course!"
Our study sets out to dissect the unexpected alignment between these seemingly disparate variables, offering a fresh perspective on the interconnectedness of digital media and professional career paths. With a statistical lens aimed at uncovering hidden patterns, we aim to embrace the curious confluence of viewer engagement and employment landscapes.
We approach this investigation armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and a stash of LEMMiNO's intellectually stimulating content, exhibiting a fervent dedication to unearthing correlations with an enthusiasm that rivals a scientist's love for a new experiment. With our gaze fixed upon the code of the correlation coefficient, we endeavor to decipher the cryptic messages embedded within this marvelous statistical enchantment.
But wait, here's a jest for the statistically inclined: "Why don't researchers trust atoms? Because they make up everything, including statistical anomalies!"
As we navigate the labyrinth of data points and regression analyses, our intent is to not only unravel the tangled yarn of numerical relationships but also to appreciate the serendipitous nature of statistical discoveries. Each data point contributes to the grand tapestry of knowledge, weaving together a narrative that captures the elusive essence of correlation and causation.
With a nod to the unexpected paths of inquiry, we inaugurate our foray into the realm of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and materials engineering, where each click and calculation beckons us closer to the convergence of science and amusement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith et al. (2015) explored the correlation between online video viewership and career choices, finding a positive relationship between the two variables. However, the specific association between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in Missouri has remained uncharted territory until now.

On the topic of unexpected correlations, Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the world of statistical anomalies and fortuitous discoveries, shedding light on the serendipitous nature of data analysis. This lines up perfectly with the surprising connection we have unraveled between LEMMiNO's captivating content and the materials engineering workforce in Missouri.

Now, turning to literature that may seem unrelated at first but holds surprising relevance, we consider "Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction" by William D. Callister and David G. Rethwisch (2010). While not directly addressing YouTube views, this foundational text underscores the crucial role of materials engineers in shaping the world around us. One might say it lays the groundwork for our unexpected findings.

In a fictional realm, Arthur C. Clarke's "The Light of Other Days" (1966) presents a world where the boundaries of observation and connection are stretched to unfathomable limits. Just as in this novel, our study uncovers an interconnectedness that defies conventional understanding.

Also, who could forget the classic movie "The Social Network" (2010), which depicts the rise of Facebook and the immense influence of online platforms on society? While Mark Zuckerberg's journey diverges from our focus on materials engineers, it exemplifies how digital content can shape career trajectories and societal dynamics.

Returning to scholarly pursuits, the works of fiction and cinematic depictions may seem distant from our rigorous data analysis. Nonetheless, their themes of unexpected connections and societal impact resonate with the unanticipated correlation we have unveiled between LEMMiNO's YouTube videos and the materials engineering landscape in Missouri.

In "Book 2," the authors find lorem and ipsum. But, of course, in the case of our research, the unexpected connection between YouTube views and engineering careers prompted an investigation that merged statistical rigor with a touch of whimsy, mirroring the erratic nature of correlation itself.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and The number of materials engineers in Missouri. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Turning Views into Materials: A Correlational Analysis of LEMMiNO YouTube Video Popularity and Materials Engineers in Missouri"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unusual relationship between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in the state of Missouri. Utilizing data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on this endeavor equipped with a pun in one hand and a statistical analysis in the other. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9624442 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, suggesting a surprisingly strong connection between these variables.

Brace yourself for a dad joke, for we simply cannot resist: "What did the materials engineer say to the LEMMiNO viewer? Let's bond over our shared interests!"

Furthermore, we delve into the implications of our results, discussing the potential influence of popular YouTube content on career choices in engineering, as well as the reciprocal impact of the materials engineering field on the entertainment industry. By shedding light on this unanticipated correlation, our study contributes to the substantiation of the far-reaching and quirky interconnections within our complex world.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enchanting world of online video content has captivated audiences worldwide, rendering itself a dominant force in shaping cultural phenomena and societal trends. Meanwhile, the field of materials engineering stands as a cornerstone of innovation, leveraging scientific principles to design and develop the materials that form the foundation of modern civilization. As we embark upon the exploration of the correlation between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in Missouri, we embark with the determination of a researcher and the pun-derful wit of a father.
Pardon the interruption, but here comes another one: "Why did the materials engineer bring a pencil to the YouTube studio? To draw the viewers' attention, of course!"
Our study sets out to dissect the unexpected alignment between these seemingly disparate variables, offering a fresh perspective on the interconnectedness of digital media and professional career paths. With a statistical lens aimed at uncovering hidden patterns, we aim to embrace the curious confluence of viewer engagement and employment landscapes.
We approach this investigation armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and a stash of LEMMiNO's intellectually stimulating content, exhibiting a fervent dedication to unearthing correlations with an enthusiasm that rivals a scientist's love for a new experiment. With our gaze fixed upon the code of the correlation coefficient, we endeavor to decipher the cryptic messages embedded within this marvelous statistical enchantment.
But wait, here's a jest for the statistically inclined: "Why don't researchers trust atoms? Because they make up everything, including statistical anomalies!"
As we navigate the labyrinth of data points and regression analyses, our intent is to not only unravel the tangled yarn of numerical relationships but also to appreciate the serendipitous nature of statistical discoveries. Each data point contributes to the grand tapestry of knowledge, weaving together a narrative that captures the elusive essence of correlation and causation.
With a nod to the unexpected paths of inquiry, we inaugurate our foray into the realm of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and materials engineering, where each click and calculation beckons us closer to the convergence of science and amusement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

For this study, the methodology employed a combination of quantitative analyses and dad jokes to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in Missouri. The research team constructed a dataset spanning from 2012 to 2022, integrating information gleaned from YouTube analytics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

To initiate the investigation, the data on average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos was collected, cross-referenced, and meticulously scrutinized to ascertain patterns over the specified time frame. The Bureau of Labor Statistics provided the number of materials engineers employed in the state of Missouri, offering a complementary perspective on the prevalence of this occupation in relation to the digital entertainment landscape.

In an attempt to maintain a lighthearted ambiance amidst the rigorous data analysis, the research team intermittently injected relevant dad jokes into the discussions, much like an experimental control group for the amusement factor. These jokes were carefully selected to ensure they were as groan-inducing as possible, to measure the full extent of the team's tolerance for puns under statistical duress.

The correlation analysis between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in Missouri was conducted using robust statistical techniques, including Pearson's correlation coefficient and linear regression models. By employing these analytical methods, the study sought to quantify the strength and direction of the association between the variables, avoiding the tempting lure of causation-based conclusions.

Pardon the deviation, but here's the timely dad joke: "Why did the statistician bring a ladder to the laboratory? Because she heard the height of the research would be off the charts!"

Furthermore, in exploring the temporal aspect of this curious correlation, a time series analysis was implemented to unravel any potential fluctuations in the relationship over the years under study. This technique facilitated a comprehensive understanding of the trajectory of the variables, uncovering nuanced nuances that might have otherwise eluded detection.

Just when you thought it was safe to go back to the methodology section, here's another one: "Did you hear about the statistical analyst who drowned in the sea of data? She refused to accept anything without a significance level!"

Suffice it to say, the research methodology diligently straddled the realms of statistical rigor and joviality, as the investigation ventured into the uncharted territory of digital viewership mingling with the world of materials engineering. The combination of meticulous data analysis and carefully timed dad jokes fortified the resilience of the research team as they navigated the complexities inherent in unraveling this intriguing correlation.

And don't worry, we'll spare you from another dad joke in this section – for now.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and The number of materials engineers in Missouri. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9624442, r-squared of 0.9262989, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Turning Views into Materials: A Correlational Analysis of LEMMiNO YouTube Video Popularity and Materials Engineers in Missouri"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unusual relationship between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in the state of Missouri. Utilizing data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on this endeavor equipped with a pun in one hand and a statistical analysis in the other. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9624442 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, suggesting a surprisingly strong connection between these variables.

Brace yourself for a dad joke, for we simply cannot resist: "What did the materials engineer say to the LEMMiNO viewer? Let's bond over our shared interests!"

Furthermore, we delve into the implications of our results, discussing the potential influence of popular YouTube content on career choices in engineering, as well as the reciprocal impact of the materials engineering field on the entertainment industry. By shedding light on this unanticipated correlation, our study contributes to the substantiation of the far-reaching and quirky interconnections within our complex world.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The enchanting world of online video content has captivated audiences worldwide, rendering itself a dominant force in shaping cultural phenomena and societal trends. Meanwhile, the field of materials engineering stands as a cornerstone of innovation, leveraging scientific principles to design and develop the materials that form the foundation of modern civilization. As we embark upon the exploration of the correlation between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in Missouri, we embark with the determination of a researcher and the pun-derful wit of a father.
Pardon the interruption, but here comes another one: "Why did the materials engineer bring a pencil to the YouTube studio? To draw the viewers' attention, of course!"
Our study sets out to dissect the unexpected alignment between these seemingly disparate variables, offering a fresh perspective on the interconnectedness of digital media and professional career paths. With a statistical lens aimed at uncovering hidden patterns, we aim to embrace the curious confluence of viewer engagement and employment landscapes.
We approach this investigation armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and a stash of LEMMiNO's intellectually stimulating content, exhibiting a fervent dedication to unearthing correlations with an enthusiasm that rivals a scientist's love for a new experiment. With our gaze fixed upon the code of the correlation coefficient, we endeavor to decipher the cryptic messages embedded within this marvelous statistical enchantment.
But wait, here's a jest for the statistically inclined: "Why don't researchers trust atoms? Because they make up everything, including statistical anomalies!"
As we navigate the labyrinth of data points and regression analyses, our intent is to not only unravel the tangled yarn of numerical relationships but also to appreciate the serendipitous nature of statistical discoveries. Each data point contributes to the grand tapestry of knowledge, weaving together a narrative that captures the elusive essence of correlation and causation.
With a nod to the unexpected paths of inquiry, we inaugurate our foray into the realm of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and materials engineering, where each click and calculation beckons us closer to the convergence of science and amusement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis conducted on the relationship between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in Missouri yielded a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9624442 and an r-squared value of 0.9262989 for the period from 2012 to 2022. The p-value of less than 0.01 further emphasizes the significance of this strong association, akin to the strong force that binds particles in the realm of physics.

Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the robust correlation between these variables, offering a compelling depiction of the linear relationship. It's as clear as the chemical bonds unifying atoms in a stable molecule – don't you just love a good visual representation that bonds theory and reality?

Now, let's address the elephant in the room: "How did the materials engineer respond to the correlation results? She said, 'These data really steel my resolve to excel in my field!'"

The findings illustrate a surprising nexus between the popularity of YouTube content and the professional landscape of materials engineering, hinting at a complex interplay between digital influence and career dynamics. This calls to mind the intricate interactions of subatomic particles in a quantum dance, with each influencing the other in unforeseen ways.

The robust correlation coefficient practically jumps out of the screen, much like a compelling plot twist in a thrilling video – a reminder that statistical analysis can hold its fair share of excitement. Additionally, the p-value swoops in like the hero of the statistical saga, triumphantly asserting its significance in the face of uncertainty, much like a valiant knight challenging the perils of insignificance.

One cannot help but draw parallels between this unexpected correlation and the elements of surprise that captivate audiences in LEMMiNO's captivating content. It is almost as if the statistical analysis itself is narrating a tale of technological fascination, replete with twists and turns that rival the most riveting of narratives.

Our results beckon a reevaluation of the traditional bounds of influence, prompting a reimagining of the symbiotic relationship between online media and professional pursuits. In unveiling this unanticipated connection, we invite further exploration into the uncharted territories of digital impact and vocational pathways, much like fearless voyagers venturing into uncharted waters.

In summary, the findings of this study spotlight an intriguing correlation between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in Missouri, emphasizing the need to embrace the mesmerizing interplay of digital engagement and occupational landscapes with the zeal of a curious scientist and the charm of a well-executed dad joke.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and The number of materials engineers in Missouri. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Turning Views into Materials: A Correlational Analysis of LEMMiNO YouTube Video Popularity and Materials Engineers in Missouri"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unusual relationship between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in the state of Missouri. Utilizing data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on this endeavor equipped with a pun in one hand and a statistical analysis in the other. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9624442 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, suggesting a surprisingly strong connection between these variables.

Brace yourself for a dad joke, for we simply cannot resist: "What did the materials engineer say to the LEMMiNO viewer? Let's bond over our shared interests!"

Furthermore, we delve into the implications of our results, discussing the potential influence of popular YouTube content on career choices in engineering, as well as the reciprocal impact of the materials engineering field on the entertainment industry. By shedding light on this unanticipated correlation, our study contributes to the substantiation of the far-reaching and quirky interconnections within our complex world.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. (2015) explored the correlation between online video viewership and career choices, finding a positive relationship between the two variables. However, the specific association between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in Missouri has remained uncharted territory until now.
On the topic of unexpected correlations, Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the world of statistical anomalies and fortuitous discoveries, shedding light on the serendipitous nature of data analysis. This lines up perfectly with the surprising connection we have unraveled between LEMMiNO's captivating content and the materials engineering workforce in Missouri.
Now, turning to literature that may seem unrelated at first but holds surprising relevance, we consider "Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction" by William D. Callister and David G. Rethwisch (2010). While not directly addressing YouTube views, this foundational text underscores the crucial role of materials engineers in shaping the world around us. One might say it lays the groundwork for our unexpected findings.
In a fictional realm, Arthur C. Clarke's "The Light of Other Days" (1966) presents a world where the boundaries of observation and connection are stretched to unfathomable limits. Just as in this novel, our study uncovers an interconnectedness that defies conventional understanding.
Also, who could forget the classic movie "The Social Network" (2010), which depicts the rise of Facebook and the immense influence of online platforms on society? While Mark Zuckerberg's journey diverges from our focus on materials engineers, it exemplifies how digital content can shape career trajectories and societal dynamics.
Returning to scholarly pursuits, the works of fiction and cinematic depictions may seem distant from our rigorous data analysis. Nonetheless, their themes of unexpected connections and societal impact resonate with the unanticipated correlation we have unveiled between LEMMiNO's YouTube videos and the materials engineering landscape in Missouri.
In "Book 2," the authors find lorem and ipsum. But, of course, in the case of our research, the unexpected connection between YouTube views and engineering careers prompted an investigation that merged statistical rigor with a touch of whimsy, mirroring the erratic nature of correlation itself.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis conducted on the relationship between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in Missouri yielded a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9624442 and an r-squared value of 0.9262989 for the period from 2012 to 2022. The p-value of less than 0.01 further emphasizes the significance of this strong association, akin to the strong force that binds particles in the realm of physics.
Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the robust correlation between these variables, offering a compelling depiction of the linear relationship. It's as clear as the chemical bonds unifying atoms in a stable molecule – don't you just love a good visual representation that bonds theory and reality?
Now, let's address the elephant in the room: "How did the materials engineer respond to the correlation results? She said, 'These data really steel my resolve to excel in my field!'"
The findings illustrate a surprising nexus between the popularity of YouTube content and the professional landscape of materials engineering, hinting at a complex interplay between digital influence and career dynamics. This calls to mind the intricate interactions of subatomic particles in a quantum dance, with each influencing the other in unforeseen ways.
The robust correlation coefficient practically jumps out of the screen, much like a compelling plot twist in a thrilling video – a reminder that statistical analysis can hold its fair share of excitement. Additionally, the p-value swoops in like the hero of the statistical saga, triumphantly asserting its significance in the face of uncertainty, much like a valiant knight challenging the perils of insignificance.
One cannot help but draw parallels between this unexpected correlation and the elements of surprise that captivate audiences in LEMMiNO's captivating content. It is almost as if the statistical analysis itself is narrating a tale of technological fascination, replete with twists and turns that rival the most riveting of narratives.
Our results beckon a reevaluation of the traditional bounds of influence, prompting a reimagining of the symbiotic relationship between online media and professional pursuits. In unveiling this unanticipated connection, we invite further exploration into the uncharted territories of digital impact and vocational pathways, much like fearless voyagers venturing into uncharted waters.
In summary, the findings of this study spotlight an intriguing correlation between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in Missouri, emphasizing the need to embrace the mesmerizing interplay of digital engagement and occupational landscapes with the zeal of a curious scientist and the charm of a well-executed dad joke.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The correlation between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in Missouri brought to light a surprising and intriguing relationship, much akin to a winning punchline in a comedic performance. Our findings provided empirical support for the notion that online content can have a tangible impact on the professional realms it intersects, echoing the sentiment that a good YouTube video can indeed "materialize" unforeseen consequences – pardon the pun.

Building upon the literature review's playful exploration of unusual connections, our study corroborates the serendipitous nature of data analysis, affirming the unforeseen yet substantive bonds that can be unearthed through rigorous statistical examination. Though the connection between YouTube views and materials engineering may initially seem as incongruous as a penguin in the desert, our research solidifies the legitimacy of this unanticipated correlation – a fortuitous outcome that resonates with the whimsical unpredictability of scientific inquiry.

Moreover, our results align with previous research that has delved into the influence of online platforms on career trajectories and societal dynamics, reinforcing the profound impact of digital content on vocational pathways. Just as a well-timed dad joke can bring lightness to a serious conversation, the unexpected correlation we unraveled adds a touch of levity to the predominantly stoic landscape of statistical analysis, epitomizing the delightful fusion of scholarly rigor with a hint of quirky charm.

The robust correlation coefficient and p-value underscored the significant association between YouTube views and the materials engineering workforce, akin to the decisive weight of evidence in shaping scientific discourse. Our research stands as a testament to the captivating potential of interdisciplinary inquiry, blending the realms of digital engagement and professional landscapes with the elegance of a well-executed research design – a nod to the artistry of investigative practice and the cleverness of a carefully crafted dad joke.

In essence, our study contributes to the substantiation of peculiar yet meaningful interconnections within our complex world, illuminating the unforeseen ties that bind seemingly disparate domains. Much like the unexpected plot twists that captivate audiences in LEMMiNO's intriguing narratives, the correlation we revealed mirrors the enthralling allure of statistical analysis, infusing the academic pursuit with a dash of narrative excitement and a sprinkle of intellectual delight.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and The number of materials engineers in Missouri. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Turning Views into Materials: A Correlational Analysis of LEMMiNO YouTube Video Popularity and Materials Engineers in Missouri"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unusual relationship between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in the state of Missouri. Utilizing data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on this endeavor equipped with a pun in one hand and a statistical analysis in the other. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9624442 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, suggesting a surprisingly strong connection between these variables.

Brace yourself for a dad joke, for we simply cannot resist: "What did the materials engineer say to the LEMMiNO viewer? Let's bond over our shared interests!"

Furthermore, we delve into the implications of our results, discussing the potential influence of popular YouTube content on career choices in engineering, as well as the reciprocal impact of the materials engineering field on the entertainment industry. By shedding light on this unanticipated correlation, our study contributes to the substantiation of the far-reaching and quirky interconnections within our complex world.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The enchanting world of online video content has captivated audiences worldwide, rendering itself a dominant force in shaping cultural phenomena and societal trends. Meanwhile, the field of materials engineering stands as a cornerstone of innovation, leveraging scientific principles to design and develop the materials that form the foundation of modern civilization. As we embark upon the exploration of the correlation between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in Missouri, we embark with the determination of a researcher and the pun-derful wit of a father.
Pardon the interruption, but here comes another one: "Why did the materials engineer bring a pencil to the YouTube studio? To draw the viewers' attention, of course!"
Our study sets out to dissect the unexpected alignment between these seemingly disparate variables, offering a fresh perspective on the interconnectedness of digital media and professional career paths. With a statistical lens aimed at uncovering hidden patterns, we aim to embrace the curious confluence of viewer engagement and employment landscapes.
We approach this investigation armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and a stash of LEMMiNO's intellectually stimulating content, exhibiting a fervent dedication to unearthing correlations with an enthusiasm that rivals a scientist's love for a new experiment. With our gaze fixed upon the code of the correlation coefficient, we endeavor to decipher the cryptic messages embedded within this marvelous statistical enchantment.
But wait, here's a jest for the statistically inclined: "Why don't researchers trust atoms? Because they make up everything, including statistical anomalies!"
As we navigate the labyrinth of data points and regression analyses, our intent is to not only unravel the tangled yarn of numerical relationships but also to appreciate the serendipitous nature of statistical discoveries. Each data point contributes to the grand tapestry of knowledge, weaving together a narrative that captures the elusive essence of correlation and causation.
With a nod to the unexpected paths of inquiry, we inaugurate our foray into the realm of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and materials engineering, where each click and calculation beckons us closer to the convergence of science and amusement.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis conducted on the relationship between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in Missouri yielded a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9624442 and an r-squared value of 0.9262989 for the period from 2012 to 2022. The p-value of less than 0.01 further emphasizes the significance of this strong association, akin to the strong force that binds particles in the realm of physics.
Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the robust correlation between these variables, offering a compelling depiction of the linear relationship. It's as clear as the chemical bonds unifying atoms in a stable molecule – don't you just love a good visual representation that bonds theory and reality?
Now, let's address the elephant in the room: "How did the materials engineer respond to the correlation results? She said, 'These data really steel my resolve to excel in my field!'"
The findings illustrate a surprising nexus between the popularity of YouTube content and the professional landscape of materials engineering, hinting at a complex interplay between digital influence and career dynamics. This calls to mind the intricate interactions of subatomic particles in a quantum dance, with each influencing the other in unforeseen ways.
The robust correlation coefficient practically jumps out of the screen, much like a compelling plot twist in a thrilling video – a reminder that statistical analysis can hold its fair share of excitement. Additionally, the p-value swoops in like the hero of the statistical saga, triumphantly asserting its significance in the face of uncertainty, much like a valiant knight challenging the perils of insignificance.
One cannot help but draw parallels between this unexpected correlation and the elements of surprise that captivate audiences in LEMMiNO's captivating content. It is almost as if the statistical analysis itself is narrating a tale of technological fascination, replete with twists and turns that rival the most riveting of narratives.
Our results beckon a reevaluation of the traditional bounds of influence, prompting a reimagining of the symbiotic relationship between online media and professional pursuits. In unveiling this unanticipated connection, we invite further exploration into the uncharted territories of digital impact and vocational pathways, much like fearless voyagers venturing into uncharted waters.
In summary, the findings of this study spotlight an intriguing correlation between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in Missouri, emphasizing the need to embrace the mesmerizing interplay of digital engagement and occupational landscapes with the zeal of a curious scientist and the charm of a well-executed dad joke.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the perplexing relationship between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in Missouri has left us both statistically fulfilled and humorously enriched. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9624442 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2022 have reinforced the unexpected synergy between these variables, much like a solid covalent bond that refuses to break – talk about statistical stability!

These findings not only shine a spotlight on the eloquent dance between online content and professional vocations but also prompt us to ponder the captivating interplay of digital influence and career trajectories. It's as if the YouTube algorithm of fate has orchestrated this delightful duet of statistical significance, akin to a masterful conductor expertly synchronizing a symphony of passion and purpose. But hey, we're not ones to make a melodramatic overture about it!

Furthermore, the intriguing implications of this correlation urge us to contemplate the fascinating ways in which viewer engagement can leave an indelible imprint on professional landscapes, much like a particularly catchy tune that refuses to leave the recesses of our minds. They say laughter is the best medicine, but who knew statistical surprises could be equally therapeutic?

Hence, we recommend that no more research is needed in this area. The evidence is solid, the dad jokes are on point, and the world of statistical correlations and unexpected interconnections has been thoroughly teased apart, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the quirky symphony of statistical serendipity. And with that, we bid adieu to this statistical escapade, armed with the wisdom that sometimes, the most enthralling insights arise from the unlikeliest of pairings. Keep crunching those numbers, and may the puns be ever in your favor!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Turning Views into Materials: A Correlational Analysis of LEMMiNO YouTube Video Popularity and Materials Engineers in Missouri. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Innovative Materials Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Turning Views into Materials: A Correlational Analysis of LEMMiNO YouTube Video Popularity and Materials Engineers in Missouri. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Interdisciplinary Materials and Media Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Turning Views into Materials: A Correlational Analysis of LEMMiNO YouTube Video Popularity and Materials Engineers in Missouri with an abstract of This study investigates the unusual relationship between the average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of materials engineers in the state of Missouri. Utilizing data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on this endeavor equipped with a pun in one hand and a statistical analysis in the other. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9624442 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, suggesting a surprisingly strong connection between these variables.
Brace yourself for a dad joke, for we simply cannot resist: "What did the materials engineer say to the LEMMiNO viewer? Let's bond over our shared interests!"
Furthermore, we delve into the implications of our results, discussing the potential influence of popular YouTube content on career choices in engineering, as well as the reciprocal impact of the materials engineering field on the entertainment industry. By shedding light on this unanticipated correlation, our study contributes to the substantiation of the far-reaching and quirky interconnections within our complex world.

ChatGPT:

LEMMiNO YouTube, video popularity, materials engineers, Missouri, correlational analysis, statistical analysis, YouTube data, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, p-value, career choices in engineering, materials engineering, entertainment industry, interconnections, quirky correlations, far-reaching impact

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
Additional Info: Current total views of videos released that year.

See what else correlates with Average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos

The number of materials engineers in Missouri
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of materials engineers in Missouri
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of materials engineers in Missouri

Correlation r = 0.9624442 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9262989 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 92.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of materials engineers in Missouri) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.1E-6. 0.0000021376723813528125000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 0.00021% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 467,799 random variables You don't actually need 467 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.86, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos (Average views)882957128510042195103785080367801044387801103560071052001381880045809004585230
The number of materials engineers in Missouri (Materials Engineers)350390400380410450590510610420400




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([882957,1285100,4219510,3785080,3678010,4438780,11035600,7105200,13818800,4580900,4585230,])
array_2 = np.array([350,390,400,380,410,450,590,510,610,420,400,])
array_1_name = "Average views of LEMMiNO YouTube videos"
array_2_name = "The number of materials engineers in Missouri"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 4757 · Black Variable ID: 25585 · Red Variable ID: 10406
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0