about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,741 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the second variable is The number of actuaries in Kansas.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Every time someone watched a LEMMiNO video, a random person in Kansas was inspired to pursue a career in actuarial science, leading to a significant increase in the number of actuaries in the state. It's as if LEMMiNO's content contained secret messages that said, "If you want a life full of numbers and calculating risk, move to Kansas and become an actuary!" So, the more views LEMMiNO got, the more people in Kansas were drawn to the fascinating world of actuarial work. It's like the ultimate Midwestern career influencer, courtesy of YouTube!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [Concept art] Create an image of a vast Kansas wheat field under a golden sunset, with the warm sunlight casting long shadows on the gently swaying wheat. In the foreground, there is a larger-than-life YouTube logo, polished and glimmering in the sunlight, with a subtle reflection of the wheat field in its surface. As the viewer's gaze shifts to the right, a bustling actuarial office emerges from the wheat, complete with a large, modern building and a parking lot filled with cars. Silhouetted figures can be seen streaming into the office, and with each passing moment, the number of professionals flooding in steadily increases, evoking a sense of growth and opportunity. The visual relationship between the burgeoning YouTube views and the expanding cohort of actuaries is evident and impactful. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos and The number of actuaries in Kansas. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy graphics Macabre Steampunk Concept art Woodblock painting
ChatGPT: Concept art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos and The number of actuaries in Kansas, in the following situation: Every time someone watched a LEMMiNO video, a random person in Kansas was inspired to pursue a career in actuarial science, leading to a significant increase in the number of actuaries in the state. It's as if LEMMiNO's content contained secret messages that said, "If you want a life full of numbers and calculating risk, move to Kansas and become an actuary!" So, the more views LEMMiNO got, the more people in Kansas were drawn to the fascinating world of actuarial work. It's like the ultimate Midwestern career influencer, courtesy of YouTube!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Imagine a sprawling Kansas wheat field, bathed in warm sunlight. In the foreground, a YouTube logo stands tall, shimmering as Total views on LEMMiNO videos steadily climb. Meanwhile, a bustling actuarial office pops up amidst the wheat, with an increasing number of professionals coming together. As the YouTube views continue to rise, more and more individuals in business attire start streaming into the office, each with a bright smile and a spark of inspiration in their eyes. The scene perfectly captures the direct correlation between the growing viewership and the increasing cohort of actuaries in Kansas.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Concept art ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a sprawling Kansas wheat field, bathed in warm sunlight. In the foreground, a YouTube logo stands tall, shimmering as Total views on LEMMiNO videos steadily climb. Meanwhile, a bustling actuarial office pops up amidst the wheat, with an increasing number of professionals coming together. As the YouTube views continue to rise, more and more individuals in business attire start streaming into the office, each with a bright smile and a spark of inspiration in their eyes. The scene perfectly captures the direct correlation between the growing viewership and the increasing cohort of actuaries in Kansas. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [Concept art] Create an image of a vast Kansas wheat field under a golden sunset, with the warm sunlight casting long shadows on the gently swaying wheat. In the foreground, there is a larger-than-life YouTube logo, polished and glimmering in the sunlight, with a subtle reflection of the wheat field in its surface. As the viewer's gaze shifts to the right, a bustling actuarial office emerges from the wheat, complete with a large, modern building and a parking lot filled with cars. Silhouetted figures can be seen streaming into the office, and with each passing moment, the number of professionals flooding in steadily increases, evoking a sense of growth and opportunity. The visual relationship between the burgeoning YouTube views and the expanding cohort of actuaries is evident and impactful.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos positively influenced The number of actuaries in Kansas.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Actuarial Attractions: Exploring the Correlation Between LEMMiNO YouTube Video Views and the Number of Number Crunchers in Kansas

The Journal of Quirky Quantitative Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos and The number of actuaries in Kansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from YouTube and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9145224 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Actuarial Attractions: Exploring the Correlation Between LEMMiNO YouTube Video Views and the Number of Number Crunchers in Kansas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected alliance between engaging online content and the labor force landscape in the Sunflower State. By analyzing a decade of data from LEMMiNO's YouTube channel and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we aimed to uncover any discernible relationship between the total views on LEMMiNO videos and the number of actuaries employed in Kansas. Our findings present a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9145224 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a robust statistical link between the two variables. This unexpected discovery illuminates the potential influence of digital media on career preferences, prompting further investigation into the peculiar power of YouTube videos in shaping the numerical pursuits of professionals in the heartland.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos and The number of actuaries in Kansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Actuarial Attractions: Exploring the Correlation Between LEMMiNO YouTube Video Views and the Number of Number Crunchers in Kansas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected alliance between engaging online content and the labor force landscape in the Sunflower State. By analyzing a decade of data from LEMMiNO's YouTube channel and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we aimed to uncover any discernible relationship between the total views on LEMMiNO videos and the number of actuaries employed in Kansas. Our findings present a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9145224 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a robust statistical link between the two variables. This unexpected discovery illuminates the potential influence of digital media on career preferences, prompting further investigation into the peculiar power of YouTube videos in shaping the numerical pursuits of professionals in the heartland.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

It has long been speculated that numbers hold an inexplicable allure, a certain je ne sais quoi that draws individuals toward careers steeped in mathematical computations and data analysis. The field of actuarial science, with its enticing blend of complex calculations and risk assessment, has captivated many a savvy number cruncher over the years. Yet, in the age of digital distractions and virtual vices, one cannot help but wonder: could the appeal of actuarial pursuits be swayed by the seductive sway of online content?

This study seeks to untangle the enigmatic connection between the mesmerizing offerings of LEMMiNO's YouTube channel and the steady proliferation of actuaries in the great state of Kansas. Yes, Kansas – the very heartland of America, where amber waves of grain undulate in the gentle Midwestern breeze, and where the intricate art of number juggling apparently thrives in unsuspected unity with captivating internet videos.

As we dive into this fathomless sea of data, we aim to shed light on the unexpected marriage between online viewership and occupational preferences in the Sunflower State. Our investigation endeavors to unravel the web of influence cast by LEMMiNO's digital productions and its curious capacity to nudge individuals into the exhilarating realm of actuarial science. So, buckle up, dear reader, as we embark on this whimsical journey through pixels and probability, where every view holds the hidden potential to shape the very fabric of a numerical profession.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos and The number of actuaries in Kansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Actuarial Attractions: Exploring the Correlation Between LEMMiNO YouTube Video Views and the Number of Number Crunchers in Kansas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected alliance between engaging online content and the labor force landscape in the Sunflower State. By analyzing a decade of data from LEMMiNO's YouTube channel and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we aimed to uncover any discernible relationship between the total views on LEMMiNO videos and the number of actuaries employed in Kansas. Our findings present a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9145224 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a robust statistical link between the two variables. This unexpected discovery illuminates the potential influence of digital media on career preferences, prompting further investigation into the peculiar power of YouTube videos in shaping the numerical pursuits of professionals in the heartland.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
It has long been speculated that numbers hold an inexplicable allure, a certain je ne sais quoi that draws individuals toward careers steeped in mathematical computations and data analysis. The field of actuarial science, with its enticing blend of complex calculations and risk assessment, has captivated many a savvy number cruncher over the years. Yet, in the age of digital distractions and virtual vices, one cannot help but wonder: could the appeal of actuarial pursuits be swayed by the seductive sway of online content?
This study seeks to untangle the enigmatic connection between the mesmerizing offerings of LEMMiNO's YouTube channel and the steady proliferation of actuaries in the great state of Kansas. Yes, Kansas – the very heartland of America, where amber waves of grain undulate in the gentle Midwestern breeze, and where the intricate art of number juggling apparently thrives in unsuspected unity with captivating internet videos.
As we dive into this fathomless sea of data, we aim to shed light on the unexpected marriage between online viewership and occupational preferences in the Sunflower State. Our investigation endeavors to unravel the web of influence cast by LEMMiNO's digital productions and its curious capacity to nudge individuals into the exhilarating realm of actuarial science. So, buckle up, dear reader, as we embark on this whimsical journey through pixels and probability, where every view holds the hidden potential to shape the very fabric of a numerical profession.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The nexus of digital media influence on career choices and propensity towards numerical professions has been an area of limited exploration within academic discourse. However, recent scholarly endeavors have witnessed a burgeoning interest in understanding the subtle ways in which online content consumption intertwines with occupational preferences. Smith et al. (2018) delved into the impact of social media engagement on career decisions, shedding light on the potential sway of digital platforms in guiding individuals towards specific professional trajectories.

Building upon this foundation, the current study seeks to unravel the unexpected correlation between Total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of actuaries in Kansas. Capturing the essence of societal leanings towards numerical vocations, Doe (2020) expounded on the intricate fabric of career choices in an increasingly digital age, hinting at the subtle allure of online engagements in shaping professional landscapes.

Furthermore, Jones (2019) delved into the subtle influence of engaging digital content on occupational predispositions, hinting at the potential sway of online media in guiding individuals towards specific career trajectories. These serious scholarly pursuits have laid the groundwork for our whimsical endeavor into uncovering the peculiar pull of LEMMiNO's YouTube creations on the number-crunching enthusiasts in Kansas.

Beyond the realms of formal academic discourse, notable non-fiction works such as "The Social Media Mind: How Social Media Is Changing Business, Politics, and Science" by John Doe, and "The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power" by Shoshana Zuboff, have offered insightful perspectives on the sway of digital media in shaping societal behaviors and influencing professional inclinations. These scholarly and non-fictional works provide a contextual backdrop for our curious exploration into the uncharted territory of YouTube viewership and actuarial pursuits.

In the realm of fiction, the curious blend of numerical predispositions and digital engagements has been subtly portrayed in literary works such as "The Calculating Stars" by Mary Robinette Kowal and "The Number Devil: A Mathematical Adventure" by Hans Magnus Enzensberger. While these whimsical works may not offer empirical evidence, they do provide a charming backdrop for our foray into the unexpected alliance between LEMMiNO YouTube content and the number-crunching minds of Kansas.

Television has also provided insights, albeit in a slightly more informal manner, with shows like "Numbers" and "Numb3rs" offering a playful representation of numerical pursuits and problem-solving, albeit in a fictionalized and dramatized setting. Our team has diligently researched (read: binged-watched) these shows to gain a comprehensive understanding of the numerical fervor that captivates viewers, providing invaluable context for our investigation.

These diverse sources, spanning from academic undertakings to literary whimsy and televised dramatizations, collectively inform our earnest exploration into the surprising correlation between Total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of actuaries employed in Kansas. With this scholarly backdrop in place, we embark on our light-hearted quest to unravel the unexpected allure of digital content on the numerical minds of the Sunflower State.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos and The number of actuaries in Kansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Actuarial Attractions: Exploring the Correlation Between LEMMiNO YouTube Video Views and the Number of Number Crunchers in Kansas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected alliance between engaging online content and the labor force landscape in the Sunflower State. By analyzing a decade of data from LEMMiNO's YouTube channel and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we aimed to uncover any discernible relationship between the total views on LEMMiNO videos and the number of actuaries employed in Kansas. Our findings present a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9145224 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a robust statistical link between the two variables. This unexpected discovery illuminates the potential influence of digital media on career preferences, prompting further investigation into the peculiar power of YouTube videos in shaping the numerical pursuits of professionals in the heartland.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
It has long been speculated that numbers hold an inexplicable allure, a certain je ne sais quoi that draws individuals toward careers steeped in mathematical computations and data analysis. The field of actuarial science, with its enticing blend of complex calculations and risk assessment, has captivated many a savvy number cruncher over the years. Yet, in the age of digital distractions and virtual vices, one cannot help but wonder: could the appeal of actuarial pursuits be swayed by the seductive sway of online content?
This study seeks to untangle the enigmatic connection between the mesmerizing offerings of LEMMiNO's YouTube channel and the steady proliferation of actuaries in the great state of Kansas. Yes, Kansas – the very heartland of America, where amber waves of grain undulate in the gentle Midwestern breeze, and where the intricate art of number juggling apparently thrives in unsuspected unity with captivating internet videos.
As we dive into this fathomless sea of data, we aim to shed light on the unexpected marriage between online viewership and occupational preferences in the Sunflower State. Our investigation endeavors to unravel the web of influence cast by LEMMiNO's digital productions and its curious capacity to nudge individuals into the exhilarating realm of actuarial science. So, buckle up, dear reader, as we embark on this whimsical journey through pixels and probability, where every view holds the hidden potential to shape the very fabric of a numerical profession.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the mystical magnetism of LEMMiNO's YouTube content on the actuarial workforce of Kansas, our research team embarked on a data-gathering adventure spanning the digital realm and the bureaucratic labyrinth of labor statistics. With a concoction of precision and whimsy, we wrangled datasets from 2012 to 2022, harnessed from the all-knowing archives of YouTube and the infallible repository of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our data collection caper involved extracting the total views of all LEMMiNO videos and the number of actuaries gainfully employed in the sprawling plains of Kansas.

The meticulous fusion of these datasets was nothing short of a mathematical mating dance, where statistical tools swirled and twirled in a tango of correlation analyses. Utilizing the latest software enchantments, we coaxed the data to unveil its secrets, teasing out the intertwined patterns of YouTube viewership and actuarial occupation counts. The bountiful data harvest allowed us to deploy the Pearson correlation coefficient, dashing through the fields of significance testing to gauge the strength and reliability of the unearthed statistical relationships.

Furthermore, our study delved into the temporal dynamics of this unlikely association, constructing scatterplots that whimsically plotted the growth of YouTube views against the budding population of number-crunching enthusiasts in Kansas. These visual aids served as lighthouses, guiding our ship of inquiry through the tempestuous seas of correlation, illuminating the thunderous tempest or tranquil tranquility of the statistical relationship at different points in time.

Intricately entwining these datasets permitted us not only to discern the correlation between YouTube viewership and actuarial employment in Kansas but also to contemplate the potential mechanisms underlying this clandestine connection. Our data odyssey was further enriched by conducting subsidiary analyses to explore potential moderating factors and the mediating role of digital content in the career preferences of Kansas's numerical cognoscenti.

In summation, our methodology endeavored to capture the whimsical essence of this curious correlation, molding arcane statistical rituals and the beauty of numerical jigsaws into a harmonious dance of data. This tango of methodologies brought about an intellectual frolic, guiding our minds through the labyrinth of evidence, and into the moonlit clearing of statistical significance and surprising discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos and The number of actuaries in Kansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9145224, r-squared of 0.8363511, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Actuarial Attractions: Exploring the Correlation Between LEMMiNO YouTube Video Views and the Number of Number Crunchers in Kansas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected alliance between engaging online content and the labor force landscape in the Sunflower State. By analyzing a decade of data from LEMMiNO's YouTube channel and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we aimed to uncover any discernible relationship between the total views on LEMMiNO videos and the number of actuaries employed in Kansas. Our findings present a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9145224 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a robust statistical link between the two variables. This unexpected discovery illuminates the potential influence of digital media on career preferences, prompting further investigation into the peculiar power of YouTube videos in shaping the numerical pursuits of professionals in the heartland.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
It has long been speculated that numbers hold an inexplicable allure, a certain je ne sais quoi that draws individuals toward careers steeped in mathematical computations and data analysis. The field of actuarial science, with its enticing blend of complex calculations and risk assessment, has captivated many a savvy number cruncher over the years. Yet, in the age of digital distractions and virtual vices, one cannot help but wonder: could the appeal of actuarial pursuits be swayed by the seductive sway of online content?
This study seeks to untangle the enigmatic connection between the mesmerizing offerings of LEMMiNO's YouTube channel and the steady proliferation of actuaries in the great state of Kansas. Yes, Kansas – the very heartland of America, where amber waves of grain undulate in the gentle Midwestern breeze, and where the intricate art of number juggling apparently thrives in unsuspected unity with captivating internet videos.
As we dive into this fathomless sea of data, we aim to shed light on the unexpected marriage between online viewership and occupational preferences in the Sunflower State. Our investigation endeavors to unravel the web of influence cast by LEMMiNO's digital productions and its curious capacity to nudge individuals into the exhilarating realm of actuarial science. So, buckle up, dear reader, as we embark on this whimsical journey through pixels and probability, where every view holds the hidden potential to shape the very fabric of a numerical profession.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The investigation into the correlation between the total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of actuaries employed in Kansas from 2012 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong relationship. The Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9145224 suggested a near-perfect positive linear association between these two seemingly disparate variables. This finding was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8363511, indicating that approximately 83.6% of the variance in the number of actuaries in Kansas could be explained by the total views on LEMMiNO videos. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no correlation, reinforcing the robustness of the observed relationship.

Fig. 1 portrays the scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between the total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of actuaries in Kansas. The tightly clustered data points form a clear ascending trend, underscoring the consistency of the positive association between these variables. The figure succinctly captures the essence of our findings and visually emphasizes the strength of the observed correlation.

These results not only offer a statistical insight into the intriguing link between digital viewership and occupational preferences but also serve as a gentle reminder of the unforeseen influences that can shape professional trajectories. The unexpected alignment of online engagement and the proliferation of actuaries in the heart of America presents a quirky narrative, reminding us that in the realm of empirical exploration, sometimes the most unconventional connections yield the most enlightening revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos and The number of actuaries in Kansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Actuarial Attractions: Exploring the Correlation Between LEMMiNO YouTube Video Views and the Number of Number Crunchers in Kansas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected alliance between engaging online content and the labor force landscape in the Sunflower State. By analyzing a decade of data from LEMMiNO's YouTube channel and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we aimed to uncover any discernible relationship between the total views on LEMMiNO videos and the number of actuaries employed in Kansas. Our findings present a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9145224 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a robust statistical link between the two variables. This unexpected discovery illuminates the potential influence of digital media on career preferences, prompting further investigation into the peculiar power of YouTube videos in shaping the numerical pursuits of professionals in the heartland.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The nexus of digital media influence on career choices and propensity towards numerical professions has been an area of limited exploration within academic discourse. However, recent scholarly endeavors have witnessed a burgeoning interest in understanding the subtle ways in which online content consumption intertwines with occupational preferences. Smith et al. (2018) delved into the impact of social media engagement on career decisions, shedding light on the potential sway of digital platforms in guiding individuals towards specific professional trajectories.
Building upon this foundation, the current study seeks to unravel the unexpected correlation between Total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of actuaries in Kansas. Capturing the essence of societal leanings towards numerical vocations, Doe (2020) expounded on the intricate fabric of career choices in an increasingly digital age, hinting at the subtle allure of online engagements in shaping professional landscapes.
Furthermore, Jones (2019) delved into the subtle influence of engaging digital content on occupational predispositions, hinting at the potential sway of online media in guiding individuals towards specific career trajectories. These serious scholarly pursuits have laid the groundwork for our whimsical endeavor into uncovering the peculiar pull of LEMMiNO's YouTube creations on the number-crunching enthusiasts in Kansas.
Beyond the realms of formal academic discourse, notable non-fiction works such as "The Social Media Mind: How Social Media Is Changing Business, Politics, and Science" by John Doe, and "The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power" by Shoshana Zuboff, have offered insightful perspectives on the sway of digital media in shaping societal behaviors and influencing professional inclinations. These scholarly and non-fictional works provide a contextual backdrop for our curious exploration into the uncharted territory of YouTube viewership and actuarial pursuits.
In the realm of fiction, the curious blend of numerical predispositions and digital engagements has been subtly portrayed in literary works such as "The Calculating Stars" by Mary Robinette Kowal and "The Number Devil: A Mathematical Adventure" by Hans Magnus Enzensberger. While these whimsical works may not offer empirical evidence, they do provide a charming backdrop for our foray into the unexpected alliance between LEMMiNO YouTube content and the number-crunching minds of Kansas.
Television has also provided insights, albeit in a slightly more informal manner, with shows like "Numbers" and "Numb3rs" offering a playful representation of numerical pursuits and problem-solving, albeit in a fictionalized and dramatized setting. Our team has diligently researched (read: binged-watched) these shows to gain a comprehensive understanding of the numerical fervor that captivates viewers, providing invaluable context for our investigation.
These diverse sources, spanning from academic undertakings to literary whimsy and televised dramatizations, collectively inform our earnest exploration into the surprising correlation between Total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of actuaries employed in Kansas. With this scholarly backdrop in place, we embark on our light-hearted quest to unravel the unexpected allure of digital content on the numerical minds of the Sunflower State.


[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the correlation between the total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of actuaries employed in Kansas from 2012 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong relationship. The Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9145224 suggested a near-perfect positive linear association between these two seemingly disparate variables. This finding was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8363511, indicating that approximately 83.6% of the variance in the number of actuaries in Kansas could be explained by the total views on LEMMiNO videos. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no correlation, reinforcing the robustness of the observed relationship.
Fig. 1 portrays the scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between the total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of actuaries in Kansas. The tightly clustered data points form a clear ascending trend, underscoring the consistency of the positive association between these variables. The figure succinctly captures the essence of our findings and visually emphasizes the strength of the observed correlation.
These results not only offer a statistical insight into the intriguing link between digital viewership and occupational preferences but also serve as a gentle reminder of the unforeseen influences that can shape professional trajectories. The unexpected alignment of online engagement and the proliferation of actuaries in the heart of America presents a quirky narrative, reminding us that in the realm of empirical exploration, sometimes the most unconventional connections yield the most enlightening revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The robust correlation we observed between the total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of actuaries employed in Kansas validated the whimsical, but earnest, musings of previous scholarly endeavors. Smith et al. (2018) laid the groundwork in comprehending the potential influence of digital media on career choices, and our findings affirm the subtle sway of engaging online content on occupational preferences. Similarly, Doe (2020) hinted at the intricate pull of online engagements in guiding professional pathways, a sentiment echoed by our statistically significant results.

Our investigation into the unexpected alliance between YouTube viewership and the number-crunching enthusiasts in Kansas serves as a playful nod to the nuanced societal leanings towards numerical vocations expounded upon by Jones (2019). As we uncovered the strong correlation, it became evident that the allure of LEMMiNO's YouTube creations has indeed left an indelible mark on the numerical pursuits of professionals in the Sunflower State, substantiating the hypothesis alluded to in various scholarly works.

Furthermore, our seemingly absurd inquiry into the linkage between digital content and occupational inclinations finds resonance with the non-fictional examinations of social media's influence on societal behaviors by John Doe and Shoshana Zuboff. Though our endeavor may bring a chuckle, our findings substantiate the potential sway of digital media in shaping professional landscapes, aligning with the serious perspectives offered by these notable authors.

The whimsical backdrop of fictional works such as "The Calculating Stars" by Mary Robinette Kowal and "The Number Devil: A Mathematical Adventure" by Hans Magnus Enzensberger finds an unexpected echo in our empirical observations, as our results lend credence to the charming intersection of numerical predispositions and digital engagements depicted in these literary whimsies.

Even our casual perusal of television shows like "Numbers" and "Numb3rs" provided invaluable context and laid the foundation for our exploration. As comical as it might seem, these fictionalized representations of numerical pursuits ultimately underscored the unexpected narrative we uncovered, exemplifying the peculiar influence of digital content on the numerical fervor that captivates viewers.

In summary, our findings, while beguiling in their presentation, reinforce the significant impact of online media on professional trajectories, and the highly unexpected, yet robust association between LEMMiNO YouTube video views and the number of actuaries in Kansas highlights the convoluted interplay of digital content and occupational preferences. Our light-hearted endeavor, rooted in the unexpected alliance between YouTube viewership and number-crunching professionals, affirms the uncanny links that often underpin even the most serious of empirical investigations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos and The number of actuaries in Kansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Actuarial Attractions: Exploring the Correlation Between LEMMiNO YouTube Video Views and the Number of Number Crunchers in Kansas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected alliance between engaging online content and the labor force landscape in the Sunflower State. By analyzing a decade of data from LEMMiNO's YouTube channel and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we aimed to uncover any discernible relationship between the total views on LEMMiNO videos and the number of actuaries employed in Kansas. Our findings present a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9145224 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a robust statistical link between the two variables. This unexpected discovery illuminates the potential influence of digital media on career preferences, prompting further investigation into the peculiar power of YouTube videos in shaping the numerical pursuits of professionals in the heartland.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
It has long been speculated that numbers hold an inexplicable allure, a certain je ne sais quoi that draws individuals toward careers steeped in mathematical computations and data analysis. The field of actuarial science, with its enticing blend of complex calculations and risk assessment, has captivated many a savvy number cruncher over the years. Yet, in the age of digital distractions and virtual vices, one cannot help but wonder: could the appeal of actuarial pursuits be swayed by the seductive sway of online content?
This study seeks to untangle the enigmatic connection between the mesmerizing offerings of LEMMiNO's YouTube channel and the steady proliferation of actuaries in the great state of Kansas. Yes, Kansas – the very heartland of America, where amber waves of grain undulate in the gentle Midwestern breeze, and where the intricate art of number juggling apparently thrives in unsuspected unity with captivating internet videos.
As we dive into this fathomless sea of data, we aim to shed light on the unexpected marriage between online viewership and occupational preferences in the Sunflower State. Our investigation endeavors to unravel the web of influence cast by LEMMiNO's digital productions and its curious capacity to nudge individuals into the exhilarating realm of actuarial science. So, buckle up, dear reader, as we embark on this whimsical journey through pixels and probability, where every view holds the hidden potential to shape the very fabric of a numerical profession.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the correlation between the total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of actuaries employed in Kansas from 2012 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong relationship. The Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9145224 suggested a near-perfect positive linear association between these two seemingly disparate variables. This finding was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8363511, indicating that approximately 83.6% of the variance in the number of actuaries in Kansas could be explained by the total views on LEMMiNO videos. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no correlation, reinforcing the robustness of the observed relationship.
Fig. 1 portrays the scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between the total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of actuaries in Kansas. The tightly clustered data points form a clear ascending trend, underscoring the consistency of the positive association between these variables. The figure succinctly captures the essence of our findings and visually emphasizes the strength of the observed correlation.
These results not only offer a statistical insight into the intriguing link between digital viewership and occupational preferences but also serve as a gentle reminder of the unforeseen influences that can shape professional trajectories. The unexpected alignment of online engagement and the proliferation of actuaries in the heart of America presents a quirky narrative, reminding us that in the realm of empirical exploration, sometimes the most unconventional connections yield the most enlightening revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study unraveled a remarkable correlation between the total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos and the number of actuaries employed in Kansas. This unexpected alliance between online viewership and the proliferation of number crunchers in the Sunflower State highlights the fascinating interplay between digital content and occupational preferences. However, it also raises intriguing questions about the potential influence of captivating internet videos on professional pathways. While the statistical robustness of our findings emphasizes the strength of this connection, we cannot overlook the whimsical nature of this peculiar correlation.

The relationship between viewing LEMMiNO's videos and the surge in actuarial numbers in Kansas has brought to light a delightful, albeit perplexing, dynamic. It appears that the captivating allure of digital content may not only entertain the masses but also nudge individuals toward numerical vocations, sowing the seeds of number-centric careers in the heartland. This whimsical narrative prompts a lighthearted reflection on the astonishing, often comical, channels through which career paths can be shaped.

After all, who could have expected that the allure of online content might hold the power to shape the career predilections of professionals in a state known for prairies and perhaps probability? This serendipitous discovery urges us to embrace the unexpected, as it reminds us of the capricious ways in which individuals are drawn into the fold of number-crunching occupations.

In light of these findings, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. The statistical rapport between YouTube views and actuarial employment in Kansas has been sufficiently illuminated, leaving us with the jovial realization that in the wondrous world of empirical inquiry, even the most seemingly incongruous connections can hold profound implications.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Actuarial Attractions: Exploring the Correlation Between LEMMiNO YouTube Video Views and the Number of Number Crunchers in Kansas. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Quantitative Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Actuarial Attractions: Exploring the Correlation Between LEMMiNO YouTube Video Views and the Number of Number Crunchers in Kansas. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Chronometric Analysis Consortium


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Actuarial Attractions: Exploring the Correlation Between LEMMiNO YouTube Video Views and the Number of Number Crunchers in Kansas with an abstract of This paper delves into the unexpected alliance between engaging online content and the labor force landscape in the Sunflower State. By analyzing a decade of data from LEMMiNO's YouTube channel and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we aimed to uncover any discernible relationship between the total views on LEMMiNO videos and the number of actuaries employed in Kansas. Our findings present a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9145224 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a robust statistical link between the two variables. This unexpected discovery illuminates the potential influence of digital media on career preferences, prompting further investigation into the peculiar power of YouTube videos in shaping the numerical pursuits of professionals in the heartland.

ChatGPT:

LEMMiNO YouTube channel, Actuarial employment in Kansas, YouTube video views and career choices, Influence of digital media on career preferences, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Correlation between video views and employment, Kansas labor force landscape, Impact of YouTube videos on professionals, Statistical link between YouTube views and actuaries in Kansas, Data analysis of LEMMiNO channel and labor statistics

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
Additional Info: Current total views of videos released that year.

See what else correlates with Total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos

The number of actuaries in Kansas
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of actuaries in Kansas
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of actuaries in Kansas

Correlation r = 0.9145224 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8363511 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of actuaries in Kansas) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.07E-5. 0.0000806737922396925300000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 0.00807% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 12,396 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.7, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos (Total views)13244300462636001772200001211220005517010039949000551782004263120027637600183236004585230
The number of actuaries in Kansas (Actuaries)330450700670490400330430350340390




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([13244300,46263600,177220000,121122000,55170100,39949000,55178200,42631200,27637600,18323600,4585230,])
array_2 = np.array([330,450,700,670,490,400,330,430,350,340,390,])
array_1_name = "Total views on LEMMiNO YouTube videos"
array_2_name = "The number of actuaries in Kansas"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 4741 · Black Variable ID: 25600 · Red Variable ID: 8134
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0