about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,708 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa and the second variable is Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of Iowans supporting the Libertarian candidate rose, so did the frequency of spontaneous debates in cars. These intense discussions led to a surge in hand gestures, inadvertently triggering faulty airbags. It seems the campaign trail wasn't the only place experiencing some heated airbag deployment!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie, depicting a car interior filled with lively debates as Iowans cast their votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate. In the midst of passionate conversations, hand gestures inadvertently triggering faulty airbags, causing unexpected deployments. This creates a surprising intersection between political fervor and automotive safety concerns. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Parallax art An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Cute cartoon Brutalism Celtic art
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags, in the following situation: As the number of Iowans supporting the Libertarian candidate rose, so did the frequency of spontaneous debates in cars. These intense discussions led to a surge in hand gestures, inadvertently triggering faulty airbags. It seems the campaign trail wasn't the only place experiencing some heated airbag deployment!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: As more Iowans cast their votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate, car interiors were filled with lively debates. In the midst of these passionate conversations, the sudden surge of hand gestures inadvertently triggered faulty airbags, causing unexpected deployments. This created a surprising intersection between political fervor and automotive safety concerns.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie ] and depicting this scene: As more Iowans cast their votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate, car interiors were filled with lively debates. In the midst of these passionate conversations, the sudden surge of hand gestures inadvertently triggered faulty airbags, causing unexpected deployments. This created a surprising intersection between political fervor and automotive safety concerns. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie, depicting a car interior filled with lively debates as Iowans cast their votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate. In the midst of passionate conversations, hand gestures inadvertently triggering faulty airbags, causing unexpected deployments. This creates a surprising intersection between political fervor and automotive safety concerns.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa caused Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Air Bags and Ballots: Exploring the Inflated Relationship between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls in Iowa

Journal of Quirky Interdisciplinary Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9709132 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Air Bags and Ballots: Exploring the Inflated Relationship between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls in Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the surprising correlation between the votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in the state of Iowa and the occurrence of automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 1990 to 2020. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9709132, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship. This unexpected association raises both eyebrows and air bags, prompting further investigation into the intriguing dynamics at play. Our study not only sheds light on the peculiar interconnectedness between political preferences and automotive safety concerns in Iowa, but also serves as a reminder that even in the realm of statistical analysis, there can be surprises around every statistical corner!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Bags and Ballots: Exploring the Inflated Relationship between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls in Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the surprising correlation between the votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in the state of Iowa and the occurrence of automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 1990 to 2020. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9709132, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship. This unexpected association raises both eyebrows and air bags, prompting further investigation into the intriguing dynamics at play. Our study not only sheds light on the peculiar interconnectedness between political preferences and automotive safety concerns in Iowa, but also serves as a reminder that even in the realm of statistical analysis, there can be surprises around every statistical corner!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the strange and wondrous world of data analysis, peculiar correlations can often emerge, leading researchers down unexpected paths of inquiry. Our study delves into one such baffling association – the curious link between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. As we navigate this uncharted statistical terrain, we are reminded of the whimsical nature of empirical investigations, where the seemingly unrelated can converge in a statistical waltz of intrigue.

The state of Iowa, known for its vast cornfields, friendly residents, and the occasional surreal political occurrence, serves as the backdrop for our investigation. Here, amidst the heartland's gentle rolling hills, we uncovered a surprising relationship between political preferences and automotive safety concerns that left us scratching our heads – and adjusting our seat belts.

Astonishingly, our analysis, spanning from 1990 to 2020 and drawing from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9709132, accompanied by a strikingly low p-value, signaling a statistically significant connection. It's as if the forces of statistical probability conspired to draw our attention to this unlikely nexus of politics and automotive technology, prompting us to peer beneath the statistical hood and investigate further.

At first glance, one might assume this correlation to be a chance alignment or statistical mirage, but our rigorous analysis insists otherwise. As we embark on this journey of statistical exploration, we invite our readers to suspend disbelief and join us in unraveling the enigmatic relationship between voting patterns and automotive safety in the great state of Iowa. For indeed, in the world of statistics, the unexpected can be as commonplace as a pothole in the road – and just as intriguing to study.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Bags and Ballots: Exploring the Inflated Relationship between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls in Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the surprising correlation between the votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in the state of Iowa and the occurrence of automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 1990 to 2020. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9709132, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship. This unexpected association raises both eyebrows and air bags, prompting further investigation into the intriguing dynamics at play. Our study not only sheds light on the peculiar interconnectedness between political preferences and automotive safety concerns in Iowa, but also serves as a reminder that even in the realm of statistical analysis, there can be surprises around every statistical corner!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the strange and wondrous world of data analysis, peculiar correlations can often emerge, leading researchers down unexpected paths of inquiry. Our study delves into one such baffling association – the curious link between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. As we navigate this uncharted statistical terrain, we are reminded of the whimsical nature of empirical investigations, where the seemingly unrelated can converge in a statistical waltz of intrigue.
The state of Iowa, known for its vast cornfields, friendly residents, and the occasional surreal political occurrence, serves as the backdrop for our investigation. Here, amidst the heartland's gentle rolling hills, we uncovered a surprising relationship between political preferences and automotive safety concerns that left us scratching our heads – and adjusting our seat belts.
Astonishingly, our analysis, spanning from 1990 to 2020 and drawing from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9709132, accompanied by a strikingly low p-value, signaling a statistically significant connection. It's as if the forces of statistical probability conspired to draw our attention to this unlikely nexus of politics and automotive technology, prompting us to peer beneath the statistical hood and investigate further.
At first glance, one might assume this correlation to be a chance alignment or statistical mirage, but our rigorous analysis insists otherwise. As we embark on this journey of statistical exploration, we invite our readers to suspend disbelief and join us in unraveling the enigmatic relationship between voting patterns and automotive safety in the great state of Iowa. For indeed, in the world of statistics, the unexpected can be as commonplace as a pothole in the road – and just as intriguing to study.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature related to the baffling correlation between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa and automotive recalls for issues with air bags is as varied as a multi-lane highway during rush hour. In "Smith and Doe's Analysis of Political Preferences and Consumer Behavior," the authors find a tenuous link between political affiliations and product recalls, hinting at a potential relationship ripe for further exploration. Similarly, Jones et al. shed light on the interplay between political ideologies and consumer purchasing decisions, albeit in a context far removed from the realm of automotive safety features.

While the scholarly literature provides a solid foundation for our inquiry, it is essential to broaden our perspective beyond traditional academic sources. The real-world implications of our findings beckon us to consider a diverse array of influences. For instance, in "Car Troubles: An Automotive Saga," Lorem and Ipsum provide a firsthand account of air bag malfunctions and their potential impact on drivers' political proclivities, leading us to ponder whether a deflated air bag can also deflate one's commitment to mainstream political parties.

Turning to the realm of fiction, the novel "Collision Course: A Political Thriller" by A. Novel Author presents a gripping narrative where political intrigue collides with automotive misfortunes, blurring the lines between fact and fiction – not unlike our perplexing research findings. As we traverse this quirky landscape of statistical oddities, we are compelled to consider the uncharted territory of social media commentary. In a tweet by @StatGeek24, a self-proclaimed statistical aficionado, an astute observation suggests that the "air bags may not be the only thing getting inflated in this political equation."

Amidst the serious tone of academic discourse, it becomes evident that the exploration of this unconventional correlation demands a blend of scholarly rigor and lighthearted curiosity. As we continue our journey, we invite our readers to buckle up for a statistical adventure unlike any other, where the improbable becomes the norm, and where the only predictable element is the unpredictability itself.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT . You used data from 1990 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Bags and Ballots: Exploring the Inflated Relationship between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls in Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the surprising correlation between the votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in the state of Iowa and the occurrence of automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 1990 to 2020. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9709132, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship. This unexpected association raises both eyebrows and air bags, prompting further investigation into the intriguing dynamics at play. Our study not only sheds light on the peculiar interconnectedness between political preferences and automotive safety concerns in Iowa, but also serves as a reminder that even in the realm of statistical analysis, there can be surprises around every statistical corner!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the strange and wondrous world of data analysis, peculiar correlations can often emerge, leading researchers down unexpected paths of inquiry. Our study delves into one such baffling association – the curious link between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. As we navigate this uncharted statistical terrain, we are reminded of the whimsical nature of empirical investigations, where the seemingly unrelated can converge in a statistical waltz of intrigue.
The state of Iowa, known for its vast cornfields, friendly residents, and the occasional surreal political occurrence, serves as the backdrop for our investigation. Here, amidst the heartland's gentle rolling hills, we uncovered a surprising relationship between political preferences and automotive safety concerns that left us scratching our heads – and adjusting our seat belts.
Astonishingly, our analysis, spanning from 1990 to 2020 and drawing from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9709132, accompanied by a strikingly low p-value, signaling a statistically significant connection. It's as if the forces of statistical probability conspired to draw our attention to this unlikely nexus of politics and automotive technology, prompting us to peer beneath the statistical hood and investigate further.
At first glance, one might assume this correlation to be a chance alignment or statistical mirage, but our rigorous analysis insists otherwise. As we embark on this journey of statistical exploration, we invite our readers to suspend disbelief and join us in unraveling the enigmatic relationship between voting patterns and automotive safety in the great state of Iowa. For indeed, in the world of statistics, the unexpected can be as commonplace as a pothole in the road – and just as intriguing to study.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To tackle the enigmatic relationship between the votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa and the occurrences of automotive recalls for issues with air bags, our research team embarked on a methodological odyssey as perplexing and exhilarating as a game of statistical Sudoku.

Data Collection:
Our data collection process resembled a treasure hunt across the digital landscape, as we scoured the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation for the relevant nuggets of information. We acquired voting data from the esteemed MIT Election Data and Science Lab, which provided us with a rich tapestry of electoral preferences in Iowa over the span of three decades. Concurrently, we delved into the repository of automotive recalls from the US Department of Transportation, unearthing a trove of air bag-related safety alerts that formed the cornerstone of our automotive data analysis.

Data Cleaning:
With the raw data in hand, our team donned the metaphorical statistical hazmat suits and proceeded to engage in the meticulous process of data cleaning. This involved sifting through the electoral and automotive datasets to ensure consistency and accuracy, akin to separating the statistical wheat from the chaff. Outliers and anomalies were scrutinized with the precision of an eagle-eyed statistical detective, ensuring that our subsequent analysis would rest upon a bedrock of reliable data.

Variable Manipulation and Transformation:
The next phase of our methodological ballet involved the manipulation and transformation of variables, as we sought to align the voting and automotive data into a harmonious statistical symphony. Here, we engaged in a delicate dance of data restructuring, merging, and crafting new variables that would enable us to explore the nuanced relationship between political preferences and automotive safety concerns. It was akin to playing a statistical game of Tetris, where variables and data points clicked into place with the satisfying precision of a well-timed statistical maneuver.

Statistical Analysis:
Armed with a dataset that had been polished and preened to statistical perfection, we unleashed a barrage of analytical tools to unveil the hidden patterns and relationships within the data. Our statistical arsenal included correlation analysis, regression modeling, and time series analysis, each serving as a lens through which we could unravel the statistical enigma at hand. Employing these tools, we navigated through the data landscape, charting the terrain of electoral votes and automotive recalls with the acumen of statistical cartographers mapping uncharted statistical territories.

Correlation Coefficient Calculation:
The cornerstone of our analysis lay in the computation of the correlation coefficient, which served as a quantitative lodestar guiding us through the statistical seas. With the fervor of statistical alchemists seeking the philosopher's stone of correlation, we crunched the numbers and unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9709132, accompanied by a p-value that elicited both astonishment and cautious validation. This statistical revelation served as the pièce de résistance of our analysis, casting a spotlight on the unexpected link between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa and automotive air bag recalls.

It is important to note that our methodology, though rigorous and meticulous, was not impervious to the occasional statistical quirk or whimsical deviation. As with any empirical pursuit, our statistical journey through the cornfields of Iowa and the highways of automotive safety was rife with both analytical precision and the occasional statistical surprise, underscoring the capricious nature of statistical inquiry. Through this methodological labyrinth, we endeavored to unearth the statistical truffles of insight and correlation, shedding light on the unlikely yet scientifically significant connection between political ballots and automotive air bags.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT .

For the time period 1990 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9709132, r-squared of 0.9426724, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Bags and Ballots: Exploring the Inflated Relationship between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls in Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the surprising correlation between the votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in the state of Iowa and the occurrence of automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 1990 to 2020. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9709132, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship. This unexpected association raises both eyebrows and air bags, prompting further investigation into the intriguing dynamics at play. Our study not only sheds light on the peculiar interconnectedness between political preferences and automotive safety concerns in Iowa, but also serves as a reminder that even in the realm of statistical analysis, there can be surprises around every statistical corner!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the strange and wondrous world of data analysis, peculiar correlations can often emerge, leading researchers down unexpected paths of inquiry. Our study delves into one such baffling association – the curious link between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. As we navigate this uncharted statistical terrain, we are reminded of the whimsical nature of empirical investigations, where the seemingly unrelated can converge in a statistical waltz of intrigue.
The state of Iowa, known for its vast cornfields, friendly residents, and the occasional surreal political occurrence, serves as the backdrop for our investigation. Here, amidst the heartland's gentle rolling hills, we uncovered a surprising relationship between political preferences and automotive safety concerns that left us scratching our heads – and adjusting our seat belts.
Astonishingly, our analysis, spanning from 1990 to 2020 and drawing from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9709132, accompanied by a strikingly low p-value, signaling a statistically significant connection. It's as if the forces of statistical probability conspired to draw our attention to this unlikely nexus of politics and automotive technology, prompting us to peer beneath the statistical hood and investigate further.
At first glance, one might assume this correlation to be a chance alignment or statistical mirage, but our rigorous analysis insists otherwise. As we embark on this journey of statistical exploration, we invite our readers to suspend disbelief and join us in unraveling the enigmatic relationship between voting patterns and automotive safety in the great state of Iowa. For indeed, in the world of statistics, the unexpected can be as commonplace as a pothole in the road – and just as intriguing to study.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the relationship between the votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa and automotive recalls for issues with air bags are nothing short of, dare we say, "inflating." Our analysis, conducted with data spanning the years 1990 to 2020 from various reputable sources, left us pleasantly surprised - and a tad bemused - by the robust correlation we unearthed.

A correlation coefficient of 0.9709132 graced our statistical findings, indicating a remarkably strong relationship between the aforementioned variables. In fact, we found that a whopping 94.27% of the variation in automotive recalls for air bag issues in Iowa can be explained by the votes for the Libertarian candidate. The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidified the statistical significance of this association, leaving us with the delightful conclusion that there is indeed more to this connection than meets the eye - or the air bag.

Remarkably, the relationship between political leanings and automotive safety concerns in Iowa appears to be as snug as a seatbelt when driving over a pothole - that is to say, unexpectedly tight. The unexpected alignment of these seemingly disparate factors has certainly inflated our curiosity and prompted a deeper inquiry into the underlying dynamics at play.

Additionally, we proudly present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that visualizes the undeniably strong correlation we observed between Libertarian votes and automotive recalls for air bag issues. The figure showcases a trend so striking, it might just prompt you to buckle up for an unexpectedly wild statistical ride.

In conclusion, our findings not only illuminate the rather peculiar interconnectedness between political preferences and automotive safety concerns in the state of Iowa but also serve as a reminder that even in the realm of statistical analysis, there can be surprises around every statistical corner.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Air Bags and Ballots: Exploring the Inflated Relationship between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls in Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the surprising correlation between the votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in the state of Iowa and the occurrence of automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 1990 to 2020. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9709132, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship. This unexpected association raises both eyebrows and air bags, prompting further investigation into the intriguing dynamics at play. Our study not only sheds light on the peculiar interconnectedness between political preferences and automotive safety concerns in Iowa, but also serves as a reminder that even in the realm of statistical analysis, there can be surprises around every statistical corner!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature related to the baffling correlation between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa and automotive recalls for issues with air bags is as varied as a multi-lane highway during rush hour. In "Smith and Doe's Analysis of Political Preferences and Consumer Behavior," the authors find a tenuous link between political affiliations and product recalls, hinting at a potential relationship ripe for further exploration. Similarly, Jones et al. shed light on the interplay between political ideologies and consumer purchasing decisions, albeit in a context far removed from the realm of automotive safety features.
While the scholarly literature provides a solid foundation for our inquiry, it is essential to broaden our perspective beyond traditional academic sources. The real-world implications of our findings beckon us to consider a diverse array of influences. For instance, in "Car Troubles: An Automotive Saga," Lorem and Ipsum provide a firsthand account of air bag malfunctions and their potential impact on drivers' political proclivities, leading us to ponder whether a deflated air bag can also deflate one's commitment to mainstream political parties.
Turning to the realm of fiction, the novel "Collision Course: A Political Thriller" by A. Novel Author presents a gripping narrative where political intrigue collides with automotive misfortunes, blurring the lines between fact and fiction – not unlike our perplexing research findings. As we traverse this quirky landscape of statistical oddities, we are compelled to consider the uncharted territory of social media commentary. In a tweet by @StatGeek24, a self-proclaimed statistical aficionado, an astute observation suggests that the "air bags may not be the only thing getting inflated in this political equation."
Amidst the serious tone of academic discourse, it becomes evident that the exploration of this unconventional correlation demands a blend of scholarly rigor and lighthearted curiosity. As we continue our journey, we invite our readers to buckle up for a statistical adventure unlike any other, where the improbable becomes the norm, and where the only predictable element is the unpredictability itself.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the relationship between the votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa and automotive recalls for issues with air bags are nothing short of, dare we say, "inflating." Our analysis, conducted with data spanning the years 1990 to 2020 from various reputable sources, left us pleasantly surprised - and a tad bemused - by the robust correlation we unearthed.
A correlation coefficient of 0.9709132 graced our statistical findings, indicating a remarkably strong relationship between the aforementioned variables. In fact, we found that a whopping 94.27% of the variation in automotive recalls for air bag issues in Iowa can be explained by the votes for the Libertarian candidate. The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidified the statistical significance of this association, leaving us with the delightful conclusion that there is indeed more to this connection than meets the eye - or the air bag.
Remarkably, the relationship between political leanings and automotive safety concerns in Iowa appears to be as snug as a seatbelt when driving over a pothole - that is to say, unexpectedly tight. The unexpected alignment of these seemingly disparate factors has certainly inflated our curiosity and prompted a deeper inquiry into the underlying dynamics at play.
Additionally, we proudly present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that visualizes the undeniably strong correlation we observed between Libertarian votes and automotive recalls for air bag issues. The figure showcases a trend so striking, it might just prompt you to buckle up for an unexpectedly wild statistical ride.
In conclusion, our findings not only illuminate the rather peculiar interconnectedness between political preferences and automotive safety concerns in the state of Iowa but also serve as a reminder that even in the realm of statistical analysis, there can be surprises around every statistical corner.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study have indeed elicited both surprise and intrigue, much like stumbling upon a well-worn political campaign bumper sticker adorning an unexpected vehicle. Our findings not only build upon the existing literature but also inflate the discourse surrounding the perplexing juxtaposition of political preferences and automotive safety concerns in the state of Iowa.

Our investigation confirmed the robust correlation between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate and automotive recalls for issues with air bags in Iowa, aligning with the prior research that hinted at the potential relationship between political leanings and product recalls. The tenuous link identified in "Smith and Doe's Analysis of Political Preferences and Consumer Behavior" appears to have gained substantial traction, much like the grip of an overzealous air bag. Similarly, the illumination provided by Jones et al. regarding the interplay between political ideologies and consumer purchasing decisions seems to extend to the realm of automotive safety features, albeit with a surprising twist.

As we navigate this statistical autobahn of unexpected connections, our findings bolster the notion that statistical oddities may indeed lurk in the most unforeseen statistical corners. Our study serves as a reminder that statistical inquiry can sometimes lead us to unexpected destinations, much like a meandering road trip on a quest for statistical enlightenment.

Fig. 1, our trusty companion in this statistical adventure, visually encapsulates the undeniably strong correlation between Libertarian votes and automotive recalls for air bag issues, serving as a beacon of statistical elegance amidst this quirkiest of statistical pursuits. We extend our gratitude to this indefatigable figure, which embodies the statistical maxim that a picture is worth a thousand data points.

In a manner befitting this curious exploration, we invite our readers to embrace the statistical wonders that arise when unexpected correlations take the wheel. Indeed, the statistical landscape is a versatile terrain, capable of accommodating the most improbable statistical oddities that intrigue and, dare we say, entertain. As we pause to reflect on our findings, we are reminded that in the realm of statistical analysis, the improbable becomes the norm, and where the only predictable element is the unpredictability itself.

Our investigation into the inflated relationship between Libertarian votes and automotive recalls for issues with air bags not only sheds light on the peculiar interconnectedness between political preferences and automotive safety concerns in Iowa but also serves as a reminder that even in the realm of statistical analysis, there can be surprises around every statistical corner. With this in mind, we must buckle up for future statistical adventures, as the road ahead promises to be as unexpected as the inextricable bond between political proclivities and automotive recalls.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Air Bags and Ballots: Exploring the Inflated Relationship between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls in Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the surprising correlation between the votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in the state of Iowa and the occurrence of automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 1990 to 2020. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9709132, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship. This unexpected association raises both eyebrows and air bags, prompting further investigation into the intriguing dynamics at play. Our study not only sheds light on the peculiar interconnectedness between political preferences and automotive safety concerns in Iowa, but also serves as a reminder that even in the realm of statistical analysis, there can be surprises around every statistical corner!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the strange and wondrous world of data analysis, peculiar correlations can often emerge, leading researchers down unexpected paths of inquiry. Our study delves into one such baffling association – the curious link between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. As we navigate this uncharted statistical terrain, we are reminded of the whimsical nature of empirical investigations, where the seemingly unrelated can converge in a statistical waltz of intrigue.
The state of Iowa, known for its vast cornfields, friendly residents, and the occasional surreal political occurrence, serves as the backdrop for our investigation. Here, amidst the heartland's gentle rolling hills, we uncovered a surprising relationship between political preferences and automotive safety concerns that left us scratching our heads – and adjusting our seat belts.
Astonishingly, our analysis, spanning from 1990 to 2020 and drawing from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9709132, accompanied by a strikingly low p-value, signaling a statistically significant connection. It's as if the forces of statistical probability conspired to draw our attention to this unlikely nexus of politics and automotive technology, prompting us to peer beneath the statistical hood and investigate further.
At first glance, one might assume this correlation to be a chance alignment or statistical mirage, but our rigorous analysis insists otherwise. As we embark on this journey of statistical exploration, we invite our readers to suspend disbelief and join us in unraveling the enigmatic relationship between voting patterns and automotive safety in the great state of Iowa. For indeed, in the world of statistics, the unexpected can be as commonplace as a pothole in the road – and just as intriguing to study.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the relationship between the votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa and automotive recalls for issues with air bags are nothing short of, dare we say, "inflating." Our analysis, conducted with data spanning the years 1990 to 2020 from various reputable sources, left us pleasantly surprised - and a tad bemused - by the robust correlation we unearthed.
A correlation coefficient of 0.9709132 graced our statistical findings, indicating a remarkably strong relationship between the aforementioned variables. In fact, we found that a whopping 94.27% of the variation in automotive recalls for air bag issues in Iowa can be explained by the votes for the Libertarian candidate. The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidified the statistical significance of this association, leaving us with the delightful conclusion that there is indeed more to this connection than meets the eye - or the air bag.
Remarkably, the relationship between political leanings and automotive safety concerns in Iowa appears to be as snug as a seatbelt when driving over a pothole - that is to say, unexpectedly tight. The unexpected alignment of these seemingly disparate factors has certainly inflated our curiosity and prompted a deeper inquiry into the underlying dynamics at play.
Additionally, we proudly present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that visualizes the undeniably strong correlation we observed between Libertarian votes and automotive recalls for air bag issues. The figure showcases a trend so striking, it might just prompt you to buckle up for an unexpectedly wild statistical ride.
In conclusion, our findings not only illuminate the rather peculiar interconnectedness between political preferences and automotive safety concerns in the state of Iowa but also serve as a reminder that even in the realm of statistical analysis, there can be surprises around every statistical corner.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In wrapping up our adventures in the statistical wonderland of air bags and ballots, we find ourselves both amused and intrigued by the unexpectedly firm connection between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa and automotive recalls for air bag issues. Our analysis has not only inflated the significance of this peculiar relationship but also left us marveling at the statistical oddities that can emerge from the cornfields of Iowa.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9709132 has left us as astonished as a deer caught in the headlights - a fitting analogy, given our automotive theme. The p-value less than 0.01 has further heightened our statistical senses, emphasizing the unmistakably strong tie between political proclivities and automotive safety concerns.

As we bid adieu to this curious statistical soiree, we cannot help but chuckle at the prospect of political rallies featuring air bag demonstrations or vehicle recalls influenced by electoral campaigns. Alas, the statistical world never ceases to amaze with its whimsical tapestries of data.

In light of our findings, we unequivocally assert that no more research is needed in this area. It's safe to say that our analysis has reached an airtight conclusion, leaving us with the satisfying closure of an inflated statistical mystery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Air Bags and Ballots: Exploring the Inflated Relationship between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls in Iowa. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Quirky Interdisciplinary Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Air Bags and Ballots: Exploring the Inflated Relationship between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls in Iowa. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Transportation Safety and Libertarian Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Air Bags and Ballots: Exploring the Inflated Relationship between Libertarian Votes and Automotive Recalls in Iowa with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the surprising correlation between the votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in the state of Iowa and the occurrence of automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 1990 to 2020. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9709132, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship. This unexpected association raises both eyebrows and air bags, prompting further investigation into the intriguing dynamics at play. Our study not only sheds light on the peculiar interconnectedness between political preferences and automotive safety concerns in Iowa, but also serves as a reminder that even in the realm of statistical analysis, there can be surprises around every statistical corner!

ChatGPT:

Iowa, Libertarian Presidential candidate, automotive recalls, air bags, correlation, statistical analysis, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, US Department of Transportation, political preferences, safety concerns

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa

Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags

Correlation r = 0.9709132 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9426724 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 94.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa) over the 8 years from 1990 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.02E-5. 0.0000601873439246216400000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.00602% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 16,615 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.84, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19921996200020042008201220162020
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa (Percentage of votes)0.07943260.187590.2371730.1985520.298610.8169743.780451.15503
Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags (Recalls)481514132310658




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.0794326,0.18759,0.237173,0.198552,0.29861,0.816974,3.78045,1.15503,])
array_2 = np.array([4,8,15,14,13,23,106,58,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Iowa"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 4708 · Black Variable ID: 26095 · Red Variable ID: 1105
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0