about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,675 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and the second variable is The average number of likes on Tom Scott's YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more people adopted cats, the feline energy in the universe elevated, leading to a widespread sense of contentment and joy. This subtle but powerful shift in the cosmic meowtrix resulted in viewers being more inclined to appreciate and engage with Tom Scott's educational and entertaining content, ultimately boosting the average number of likes on his YouTube videos. Remember, a purrfectly balanced world is a happier world!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a serene living room bathed in warm, cozy light. In the center, a smiling person is seated, typing "adopt a cat" into a laptop. Surrounding them, a tranquil atmosphere permeates the room, as a contented cat relaxes beside the laptop. Simultaneously, on the adjacent TV screen, a Tom Scott video plays, with the like count rapidly increasing and sending out a ripple effect of positive energy. The scene evokes a sense of hope and joy, capturing the feeling of a peaceful and heartwarming moment. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and The average number of likes on Tom Scott YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a Polaroid photo A Discovery magazine cover image Hyper-realistic Psychedelic Cyberpunk
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and The average number of likes on Tom Scott YouTube videos, in the following situation: As more people adopted cats, the feline energy in the universe elevated, leading to a widespread sense of contentment and joy. This subtle but powerful shift in the cosmic meowtrix resulted in viewers being more inclined to appreciate and engage with Tom Scott's educational and entertaining content, ultimately boosting the average number of likes on his YouTube videos. Remember, a purrfectly balanced world is a happier world!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a serene and cozy living room, a smiling person sits at their laptop, typing "adopt a cat" into the Google search bar. As they hit the enter key, a warm glow seems to emanate from the screen, filling the room with a sense of hope and joy. Meanwhile, on the adjacent TV screen, a Tom Scott video plays, and the number of likes rapidly increases, creating a ripple effect of positive energy. A contented cat curls up beside the laptop, basking in the peaceful aura of the room.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a serene and cozy living room, a smiling person sits at their laptop, typing "adopt a cat" into the Google search bar. As they hit the enter key, a warm glow seems to emanate from the screen, filling the room with a sense of hope and joy. Meanwhile, on the adjacent TV screen, a Tom Scott video plays, and the number of likes rapidly increases, creating a ripple effect of positive energy. A contented cat curls up beside the laptop, basking in the peaceful aura of the room. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a serene living room bathed in warm, cozy light. In the center, a smiling person is seated, typing "adopt a cat" into a laptop. Surrounding them, a tranquil atmosphere permeates the room, as a contented cat relaxes beside the laptop. Simultaneously, on the adjacent TV screen, a Tom Scott video plays, with the like count rapidly increasing and sending out a ripple effect of positive energy. The scene evokes a sense of hope and joy, capturing the feeling of a peaceful and heartwarming moment.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in adopt a cat (Google searches for 'adopt a cat') caused The average number of likes on Tom Scott YouTube videos to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Pawsitively Linked: The Meow-nificent Correlation Between Google Searches for 'Adopt a Cat' and Tom Scott YouTube Video Likes

The Journal of Feline Internet Phenomena

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and The average number of likes on Tom Scott YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9666834 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Pawsitively Linked: The Meow-nificent Correlation Between Google Searches for 'Adopt a Cat' and Tom Scott YouTube Video Likes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The purr-pose of this study was to investigate a potential feline-fascinating relationship between the frequency of Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and the average number of likes on Tom Scott's educational and entertaining YouTube videos. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and YouTube to unleash the truth behind this uncharted territory. We found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9666834 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period from 2009 to 2023. Meowsers, talk about a pawsitively meow-nificent discovery!

Our findings reveal a whisker-twirling connection between the search behavior for potential cat adoptions and the engagement with Tom Scott's captivating videos. This phenomenon sheds light on the un-fur-tunate yet hypo-cat-ical truth that feline-related content is captivating attention online. As our research progresses, we aim to explore the underlying causality behind this correlation and delve deeper into the world of internet culture and feline fascination. In the realm of online content, it's clear that the pawsitively captivating allure of potential cat adoption and Tom Scott's intriguing insights are not to be taken lightly. As much as we're feline good about our findings, it's time to whisker away the remaining uncertainties and continue our pursuit of understanding the cat-alystic forces at play in the digital sphere.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and The average number of likes on Tom Scott YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Pawsitively Linked: The Meow-nificent Correlation Between Google Searches for 'Adopt a Cat' and Tom Scott YouTube Video Likes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The purr-pose of this study was to investigate a potential feline-fascinating relationship between the frequency of Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and the average number of likes on Tom Scott's educational and entertaining YouTube videos. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and YouTube to unleash the truth behind this uncharted territory. We found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9666834 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period from 2009 to 2023. Meowsers, talk about a pawsitively meow-nificent discovery!

Our findings reveal a whisker-twirling connection between the search behavior for potential cat adoptions and the engagement with Tom Scott's captivating videos. This phenomenon sheds light on the un-fur-tunate yet hypo-cat-ical truth that feline-related content is captivating attention online. As our research progresses, we aim to explore the underlying causality behind this correlation and delve deeper into the world of internet culture and feline fascination. In the realm of online content, it's clear that the pawsitively captivating allure of potential cat adoption and Tom Scott's intriguing insights are not to be taken lightly. As much as we're feline good about our findings, it's time to whisker away the remaining uncertainties and continue our pursuit of understanding the cat-alystic forces at play in the digital sphere.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:

Introducing our feline-fascinating research endeavor, we set out to explore the enchanting correlation between the frequency of Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and the average number of likes on Tom Scott's YouTube videos. As researchers, we were initially a bit purr-plexed by this peculiar pairing. However, we soon discovered that there's more than meets the eye when it comes to the connection between internet users' penchant for potential feline companions and their engagement with Tom Scott's educational purr-spectives. It's a tale as old as time – or should we say, a tail as old as time?

Meow-ving on to the scientific crux of our endeavor, we delve deep into the realm of data analysis and statistical scrutiny. Our team meticulously combed through the data from Google Trends and YouTube, unleashing a fur-ocious quest to uncover the truth behind this uncharted territory. With our claws sharpened and our curiosity piqued, we dug deep into the numbers to unveil the mystifying correlation lurking in the vast expanse of the internet.

As we meow-nder through the maze of research, we encountered a correlation coefficient of 0.9666834 – a figure that left us feline quite smug, to say the least. This seemingly near-purrrfect correlation was accompanied by a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, leaving us with whiskers twitching with excitement. It's not every day in science that you stumble upon such a remarkable correlation. With such meow-nificent findings in our paws, we couldn't help but paws and reflect on the gravity of our discovery.

However, prowling deeper into the data, we discovered that this correlation is no mere cat-chance occurrence. It speaks volumes about the seemingly inexhaustible appeal of feline-related content in the digital sphere. It's clear as day that internet users are not kitten around when it comes to their fascination with potential cat adoptions and Tom Scott's captivating content. It's an intriguing juxtaposition, to say the least – the timeless allure of feline companionship and the modern allure of educational content, as if the internet has become a playground for cats and curious minds alike.

With our findings laid bare, we embark on a fur-ther quest to untangle the causality behind this captivating correlation. As we embark on this journey, we revel in the thrill of scientific exploration, eager to shed light on the underlying forces at play in the feline-tinged digital landscape. So, let's paws for a moment, contemplate the fur-ther mysteries that await us, and revel in the sheer delight of unraveling the curious connections that lurk in the statistical underbrush.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and The average number of likes on Tom Scott YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Pawsitively Linked: The Meow-nificent Correlation Between Google Searches for 'Adopt a Cat' and Tom Scott YouTube Video Likes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The purr-pose of this study was to investigate a potential feline-fascinating relationship between the frequency of Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and the average number of likes on Tom Scott's educational and entertaining YouTube videos. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and YouTube to unleash the truth behind this uncharted territory. We found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9666834 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period from 2009 to 2023. Meowsers, talk about a pawsitively meow-nificent discovery!

Our findings reveal a whisker-twirling connection between the search behavior for potential cat adoptions and the engagement with Tom Scott's captivating videos. This phenomenon sheds light on the un-fur-tunate yet hypo-cat-ical truth that feline-related content is captivating attention online. As our research progresses, we aim to explore the underlying causality behind this correlation and delve deeper into the world of internet culture and feline fascination. In the realm of online content, it's clear that the pawsitively captivating allure of potential cat adoption and Tom Scott's intriguing insights are not to be taken lightly. As much as we're feline good about our findings, it's time to whisker away the remaining uncertainties and continue our pursuit of understanding the cat-alystic forces at play in the digital sphere.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introducing our feline-fascinating research endeavor, we set out to explore the enchanting correlation between the frequency of Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and the average number of likes on Tom Scott's YouTube videos. As researchers, we were initially a bit purr-plexed by this peculiar pairing. However, we soon discovered that there's more than meets the eye when it comes to the connection between internet users' penchant for potential feline companions and their engagement with Tom Scott's educational purr-spectives. It's a tale as old as time – or should we say, a tail as old as time?
Meow-ving on to the scientific crux of our endeavor, we delve deep into the realm of data analysis and statistical scrutiny. Our team meticulously combed through the data from Google Trends and YouTube, unleashing a fur-ocious quest to uncover the truth behind this uncharted territory. With our claws sharpened and our curiosity piqued, we dug deep into the numbers to unveil the mystifying correlation lurking in the vast expanse of the internet.
As we meow-nder through the maze of research, we encountered a correlation coefficient of 0.9666834 – a figure that left us feline quite smug, to say the least. This seemingly near-purrrfect correlation was accompanied by a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, leaving us with whiskers twitching with excitement. It's not every day in science that you stumble upon such a remarkable correlation. With such meow-nificent findings in our paws, we couldn't help but paws and reflect on the gravity of our discovery.
However, prowling deeper into the data, we discovered that this correlation is no mere cat-chance occurrence. It speaks volumes about the seemingly inexhaustible appeal of feline-related content in the digital sphere. It's clear as day that internet users are not kitten around when it comes to their fascination with potential cat adoptions and Tom Scott's captivating content. It's an intriguing juxtaposition, to say the least – the timeless allure of feline companionship and the modern allure of educational content, as if the internet has become a playground for cats and curious minds alike.
With our findings laid bare, we embark on a fur-ther quest to untangle the causality behind this captivating correlation. As we embark on this journey, we revel in the thrill of scientific exploration, eager to shed light on the underlying forces at play in the feline-tinged digital landscape. So, let's paws for a moment, contemplate the fur-ther mysteries that await us, and revel in the sheer delight of unraveling the curious connections that lurk in the statistical underbrush.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In Smith et al.'s seminal work "Feline Fascination: The Internet's Love Affair with Cats," the authors find a thriving trend of internet users' engagement with feline-related content. The study sheds light on the undeniable appeal of cats in the digital era, leaving readers amused and perhaps even feline a bit more enamored with these furry creatures. Speaking of which, what's a cat's favorite color? Purrr-ple.

Doe and Jones, in their publication "The Purr-suasion of Cat Videos: Unraveling the Online Feline Craze," delve into the captivating allure of cat videos and their impact on internet user behavior. The authors elucidate the seemingly enigmatic attraction of these videos, offering insights that leave readers purring for more. One can't help but wonder if these findings are the cat's pajamas of internet research.

Turning to a slightly different domain, let's consider "The Joy of Cooking Kittens" by Lorem Ipsum. This tongue-in-cheek exploration of culinary creativity, while not directly related to our subject matter, serves as a humorous reminder that not all things feline are meant to be taken too seriously. Just like a good pun, it's always important to keep things light-hearted in the realm of research.

In a surprising turn of events, the classic work "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" by Lewis Carroll bears relevance to our investigation. While not a scientific treatise, the whimsical world of Wonderland offers a reminder that curiosity often leads to the most unexpected discoveries. After all, who's to say that a curious cat and a rabbit hole can't hold the keys to unlocking the mysteries of internet engagement?

Let's not forget the board game "Exploding Kittens," known for its blend of strategy and unpredictable fun. While it may not directly inform our research, the title alone serves as a playful nod to the unpredictability of internet trends and user behavior. Sometimes, the most unexpected correlations can be as surprising as, well, an exploding kitten!

Now, back to our pursuit of understanding the connection between Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and the average number of likes on Tom Scott's YouTube videos. As we paws for a moment to consider the interplay of seemingly disparate factors, we can't help but marvel at the whimsical nature of correlations and the surprising paths of research exploration. Just like a well-timed dad joke, our findings are bound to elicit a mixture of amusement and contemplation – after all, what's research without a bit of unexpected humor?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and The average number of likes on Tom Scott YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and YouTube . You used data from 2009 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Pawsitively Linked: The Meow-nificent Correlation Between Google Searches for 'Adopt a Cat' and Tom Scott YouTube Video Likes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The purr-pose of this study was to investigate a potential feline-fascinating relationship between the frequency of Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and the average number of likes on Tom Scott's educational and entertaining YouTube videos. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and YouTube to unleash the truth behind this uncharted territory. We found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9666834 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period from 2009 to 2023. Meowsers, talk about a pawsitively meow-nificent discovery!

Our findings reveal a whisker-twirling connection between the search behavior for potential cat adoptions and the engagement with Tom Scott's captivating videos. This phenomenon sheds light on the un-fur-tunate yet hypo-cat-ical truth that feline-related content is captivating attention online. As our research progresses, we aim to explore the underlying causality behind this correlation and delve deeper into the world of internet culture and feline fascination. In the realm of online content, it's clear that the pawsitively captivating allure of potential cat adoption and Tom Scott's intriguing insights are not to be taken lightly. As much as we're feline good about our findings, it's time to whisker away the remaining uncertainties and continue our pursuit of understanding the cat-alystic forces at play in the digital sphere.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introducing our feline-fascinating research endeavor, we set out to explore the enchanting correlation between the frequency of Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and the average number of likes on Tom Scott's YouTube videos. As researchers, we were initially a bit purr-plexed by this peculiar pairing. However, we soon discovered that there's more than meets the eye when it comes to the connection between internet users' penchant for potential feline companions and their engagement with Tom Scott's educational purr-spectives. It's a tale as old as time – or should we say, a tail as old as time?
Meow-ving on to the scientific crux of our endeavor, we delve deep into the realm of data analysis and statistical scrutiny. Our team meticulously combed through the data from Google Trends and YouTube, unleashing a fur-ocious quest to uncover the truth behind this uncharted territory. With our claws sharpened and our curiosity piqued, we dug deep into the numbers to unveil the mystifying correlation lurking in the vast expanse of the internet.
As we meow-nder through the maze of research, we encountered a correlation coefficient of 0.9666834 – a figure that left us feline quite smug, to say the least. This seemingly near-purrrfect correlation was accompanied by a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, leaving us with whiskers twitching with excitement. It's not every day in science that you stumble upon such a remarkable correlation. With such meow-nificent findings in our paws, we couldn't help but paws and reflect on the gravity of our discovery.
However, prowling deeper into the data, we discovered that this correlation is no mere cat-chance occurrence. It speaks volumes about the seemingly inexhaustible appeal of feline-related content in the digital sphere. It's clear as day that internet users are not kitten around when it comes to their fascination with potential cat adoptions and Tom Scott's captivating content. It's an intriguing juxtaposition, to say the least – the timeless allure of feline companionship and the modern allure of educational content, as if the internet has become a playground for cats and curious minds alike.
With our findings laid bare, we embark on a fur-ther quest to untangle the causality behind this captivating correlation. As we embark on this journey, we revel in the thrill of scientific exploration, eager to shed light on the underlying forces at play in the feline-tinged digital landscape. So, let's paws for a moment, contemplate the fur-ther mysteries that await us, and revel in the sheer delight of unraveling the curious connections that lurk in the statistical underbrush.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic connection between Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and the average number of likes on Tom Scott's YouTube videos, our research team embarked on an enthralling journey through the labyrinth of research methodologies. With our curiosity piqued and our sense of humor fully intact, we employed a mix of quantitative analysis, data mining, and statistical scrutiny to chase down the elusive truth behind this seemingly paw-sitively captivating correlation.

First, we harnessed the power of Google Trends to procure the search interest data for the term 'adopt a cat' from 2009 to 2023. Meow-velously, this invaluable tool equipped us with the purr-fect lens to peer into the feline-obsessed minds of internet users, revealing the ebb and flow of their curiosity about potential cat adoptions over the years. It's as if we had unleashed a pandora's box of feline fascination, meow-veling at the spectacle of human-cat camaraderie!

Following the trail of tantalizing data, we frolicked into the realm of YouTube analytics to glean insights into the average number of likes on Tom Scott's YouTube videos for the corresponding period. With a spring in our step and an unwavering commitment to uncovering the meow-nificent truth, we indulged in the statistical exploration of this online treasure trove, mining it for the purr-fect nuggets of information that would help us untangle the web of correlation between feline fervor and digital engagement.

In our endeavor to fully comprehend this captivating correlation, our research team engaged in a purr-plexing dance with statistical techniques, employing the wiles of correlation analysis to expose the underlying relationship between Google search interest in 'adopt a cat' and the average number of likes on Mr. Scott's thought-provoking videos. Like a cat chasing a laser pointer, we meticulously teased out the correlation coefficient and its corresponding p-value, all the while maintaining a sense of humor to keep our spirits high throughout the data wrangling process.

To ensure the robustness of our findings, we dabbled in the realms of hypothesis testing and statistical significance, invoking the scientific powers of p-values to ascertain the strength of the relationship we had uncovered. With bated breath and paws crossed, we unleashed the statistical hounds to chase down any whiff of spurious correlation, leaving no stone unturned in our quest for scientific rigor and a good laugh, as any proud dad would.

In the midst of this statistical cat-and-mouse game, we calibrated our analysis to account for any potential confounding factors that might meow-der the clarity of our findings, ensuring that our pursuit of truth remains as untainted as a cat's pristine whiskers. Through this methodical approach, we sought to establish a causal link between the feline fervor in cyberspace and the digital admiration for Tom Scott's insightful musings, keeping our eyes and ears pricked for any signs of serendipitous discovery along the way.

As we prance across the threshold of statistical inference, we navigate the interwoven tapestry of data mining and correlation analysis to uncover the hidden rhythms of feline fascination and intellectual engagement lurking within the digital underbrush. With unwavering determination and the occasional bout of whimsy, we embrace the scientific fervor that ignites our research spirits, pausing only to throw in a pun or two in what might otherwise be a mice-and-men game of numbers.

Stay pawsitive and keep chasing the truth, fellow feline enthusiasts and statistical sleuths. The cattastic correlations we seek are within our grasp, waiting to be petted and understood in all their statistical splendor!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and The average number of likes on Tom Scott YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and YouTube .

For the time period 2009 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9666834, r-squared of 0.9344767, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Pawsitively Linked: The Meow-nificent Correlation Between Google Searches for 'Adopt a Cat' and Tom Scott YouTube Video Likes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The purr-pose of this study was to investigate a potential feline-fascinating relationship between the frequency of Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and the average number of likes on Tom Scott's educational and entertaining YouTube videos. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and YouTube to unleash the truth behind this uncharted territory. We found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9666834 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period from 2009 to 2023. Meowsers, talk about a pawsitively meow-nificent discovery!

Our findings reveal a whisker-twirling connection between the search behavior for potential cat adoptions and the engagement with Tom Scott's captivating videos. This phenomenon sheds light on the un-fur-tunate yet hypo-cat-ical truth that feline-related content is captivating attention online. As our research progresses, we aim to explore the underlying causality behind this correlation and delve deeper into the world of internet culture and feline fascination. In the realm of online content, it's clear that the pawsitively captivating allure of potential cat adoption and Tom Scott's intriguing insights are not to be taken lightly. As much as we're feline good about our findings, it's time to whisker away the remaining uncertainties and continue our pursuit of understanding the cat-alystic forces at play in the digital sphere.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introducing our feline-fascinating research endeavor, we set out to explore the enchanting correlation between the frequency of Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and the average number of likes on Tom Scott's YouTube videos. As researchers, we were initially a bit purr-plexed by this peculiar pairing. However, we soon discovered that there's more than meets the eye when it comes to the connection between internet users' penchant for potential feline companions and their engagement with Tom Scott's educational purr-spectives. It's a tale as old as time – or should we say, a tail as old as time?
Meow-ving on to the scientific crux of our endeavor, we delve deep into the realm of data analysis and statistical scrutiny. Our team meticulously combed through the data from Google Trends and YouTube, unleashing a fur-ocious quest to uncover the truth behind this uncharted territory. With our claws sharpened and our curiosity piqued, we dug deep into the numbers to unveil the mystifying correlation lurking in the vast expanse of the internet.
As we meow-nder through the maze of research, we encountered a correlation coefficient of 0.9666834 – a figure that left us feline quite smug, to say the least. This seemingly near-purrrfect correlation was accompanied by a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, leaving us with whiskers twitching with excitement. It's not every day in science that you stumble upon such a remarkable correlation. With such meow-nificent findings in our paws, we couldn't help but paws and reflect on the gravity of our discovery.
However, prowling deeper into the data, we discovered that this correlation is no mere cat-chance occurrence. It speaks volumes about the seemingly inexhaustible appeal of feline-related content in the digital sphere. It's clear as day that internet users are not kitten around when it comes to their fascination with potential cat adoptions and Tom Scott's captivating content. It's an intriguing juxtaposition, to say the least – the timeless allure of feline companionship and the modern allure of educational content, as if the internet has become a playground for cats and curious minds alike.
With our findings laid bare, we embark on a fur-ther quest to untangle the causality behind this captivating correlation. As we embark on this journey, we revel in the thrill of scientific exploration, eager to shed light on the underlying forces at play in the feline-tinged digital landscape. So, let's paws for a moment, contemplate the fur-ther mysteries that await us, and revel in the sheer delight of unraveling the curious connections that lurk in the statistical underbrush.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation of 0.9666834 between the frequency of Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and the average number of likes on Tom Scott's YouTube videos over the period from 2009 to 2023. As statisticians, we were not kitten around when we spotted this correlation. It's safe to say that our research has struck a chord that resonates with both the feline-inclined and statistics-savvy audiences.

In addition to the correlation coefficient, we also calculated the r-squared value, which turned out to be 0.9344767. This not only underscores the strength of the correlation but also suggests that a whopping 93.45% of the variation in Tom Scott's video likes can be explained by the frequency of 'adopt a cat' searches. This finding left us feeling like the cat that got the cream, with a sense of statistical satisfaction that couldn't be paw-verlooked.

The statistical significance of our results is nothing to hiss at either. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently say that the observed correlation is not a mere fluke. It is as solid as the ground under a cat's paws. This p-value is our stamp of approval, declaring that the relationship between potential cat adoptions and Tom Scott's video likes is not to be taken lightly. It's the kind of statistical evidence that's as convincing as a cat's purr.

We also present the visual representation of our findings in Figure 1. The scatterplot depicted in Figure 1 illustrates the strong positive correlation between the two variables. It's quite clear that as the frequency of Google searches for 'adopt a cat' increases, so does the average number of likes on Tom Scott's videos. It's as if the internet cat-astrophe has been beckoning us to uncover this feline-infused phenomenon all along.

Stay tuned, as we continue to paw-se through the wealth of data to unravel the deeper implications and fur-ther insights into this intriguing correlation. Our feline fascination with this connection prompts us to approach the next phase of our research with whiskers twitching in anticipation, ready to meow-vel in the scientific exploration that lies ahead.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and The average number of likes on Tom Scott YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Pawsitively Linked: The Meow-nificent Correlation Between Google Searches for 'Adopt a Cat' and Tom Scott YouTube Video Likes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The purr-pose of this study was to investigate a potential feline-fascinating relationship between the frequency of Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and the average number of likes on Tom Scott's educational and entertaining YouTube videos. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and YouTube to unleash the truth behind this uncharted territory. We found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9666834 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period from 2009 to 2023. Meowsers, talk about a pawsitively meow-nificent discovery!

Our findings reveal a whisker-twirling connection between the search behavior for potential cat adoptions and the engagement with Tom Scott's captivating videos. This phenomenon sheds light on the un-fur-tunate yet hypo-cat-ical truth that feline-related content is captivating attention online. As our research progresses, we aim to explore the underlying causality behind this correlation and delve deeper into the world of internet culture and feline fascination. In the realm of online content, it's clear that the pawsitively captivating allure of potential cat adoption and Tom Scott's intriguing insights are not to be taken lightly. As much as we're feline good about our findings, it's time to whisker away the remaining uncertainties and continue our pursuit of understanding the cat-alystic forces at play in the digital sphere.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In Smith et al.'s seminal work "Feline Fascination: The Internet's Love Affair with Cats," the authors find a thriving trend of internet users' engagement with feline-related content. The study sheds light on the undeniable appeal of cats in the digital era, leaving readers amused and perhaps even feline a bit more enamored with these furry creatures. Speaking of which, what's a cat's favorite color? Purrr-ple.
Doe and Jones, in their publication "The Purr-suasion of Cat Videos: Unraveling the Online Feline Craze," delve into the captivating allure of cat videos and their impact on internet user behavior. The authors elucidate the seemingly enigmatic attraction of these videos, offering insights that leave readers purring for more. One can't help but wonder if these findings are the cat's pajamas of internet research.
Turning to a slightly different domain, let's consider "The Joy of Cooking Kittens" by Lorem Ipsum. This tongue-in-cheek exploration of culinary creativity, while not directly related to our subject matter, serves as a humorous reminder that not all things feline are meant to be taken too seriously. Just like a good pun, it's always important to keep things light-hearted in the realm of research.
In a surprising turn of events, the classic work "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" by Lewis Carroll bears relevance to our investigation. While not a scientific treatise, the whimsical world of Wonderland offers a reminder that curiosity often leads to the most unexpected discoveries. After all, who's to say that a curious cat and a rabbit hole can't hold the keys to unlocking the mysteries of internet engagement?
Let's not forget the board game "Exploding Kittens," known for its blend of strategy and unpredictable fun. While it may not directly inform our research, the title alone serves as a playful nod to the unpredictability of internet trends and user behavior. Sometimes, the most unexpected correlations can be as surprising as, well, an exploding kitten!
Now, back to our pursuit of understanding the connection between Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and the average number of likes on Tom Scott's YouTube videos. As we paws for a moment to consider the interplay of seemingly disparate factors, we can't help but marvel at the whimsical nature of correlations and the surprising paths of research exploration. Just like a well-timed dad joke, our findings are bound to elicit a mixture of amusement and contemplation – after all, what's research without a bit of unexpected humor?

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation of 0.9666834 between the frequency of Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and the average number of likes on Tom Scott's YouTube videos over the period from 2009 to 2023. As statisticians, we were not kitten around when we spotted this correlation. It's safe to say that our research has struck a chord that resonates with both the feline-inclined and statistics-savvy audiences.
In addition to the correlation coefficient, we also calculated the r-squared value, which turned out to be 0.9344767. This not only underscores the strength of the correlation but also suggests that a whopping 93.45% of the variation in Tom Scott's video likes can be explained by the frequency of 'adopt a cat' searches. This finding left us feeling like the cat that got the cream, with a sense of statistical satisfaction that couldn't be paw-verlooked.
The statistical significance of our results is nothing to hiss at either. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently say that the observed correlation is not a mere fluke. It is as solid as the ground under a cat's paws. This p-value is our stamp of approval, declaring that the relationship between potential cat adoptions and Tom Scott's video likes is not to be taken lightly. It's the kind of statistical evidence that's as convincing as a cat's purr.
We also present the visual representation of our findings in Figure 1. The scatterplot depicted in Figure 1 illustrates the strong positive correlation between the two variables. It's quite clear that as the frequency of Google searches for 'adopt a cat' increases, so does the average number of likes on Tom Scott's videos. It's as if the internet cat-astrophe has been beckoning us to uncover this feline-infused phenomenon all along.
Stay tuned, as we continue to paw-se through the wealth of data to unravel the deeper implications and fur-ther insights into this intriguing correlation. Our feline fascination with this connection prompts us to approach the next phase of our research with whiskers twitching in anticipation, ready to meow-vel in the scientific exploration that lies ahead.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings unveil an intriguing relationship between the frequency of Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and the average number of likes on Tom Scott's YouTube videos. The strong correlation coefficient of 0.9666834, backed by a statistically significant p-value, provides statistical evidence that is as convincing as a cat's purr. This correlation is not a mere fluke— it's the real catnip. It's fascinating to see how internet users' interest in potential cat adoptions purr-ingly translates into engagement with Tom Scott's content.

Building on the prior research conducted by Smith et al. and Doe and Jones, our results purr-fectly align with the notion that feline-related content captivates the attention of online audiences. As if we needed more evidence, our findings confirm that the allure of cat-related searches and Tom Scott's videos is not just an internet anecdote—it's as real as a cat's whiskers. In the domain of internet culture, the whimsical correlation we've uncovered underscores the importance of exploring unexpected avenues to understand online engagement. Just like a cat's curiosity, it's the unexpected correlations that lead to meow-nificent discoveries.

The r-squared value of 0.9344767 indicates that a whopping 93.45% of the variation in Tom Scott's video likes can be explained by the frequency of 'adopt a cat' searches. This statistic isn't just catty—it's a lion of a finding. It raises interesting questions about the underlying motiv-fur-tions behind this correlation. Is it the irresistible urge to adopt a cat that leads internet users to engage with educational videos, or is it the engaging content that sparks an interest in potential feline companionship? The interplay of these factors beckons us to dive deeper into the catacomb of internet behavior.

With a scatterplot that visually depicts the strong positive correlation, our research presents a compelling case for the impact of cat-related interest on online user engagement. It's as if we have un-fur-thed a digital catnip that entices users to engage with captivating content. As our research continues to purr-ceed, we're itching to uncover the causal mechanisms behind this feline fascination, ready to purr-take in the scientific exploration that lies ahead. And remember, if at first you don't succeed, then you're not statistically significant.

Stay tuned for more whisker-twitching insights as we continue to unravel the mysteries of internet engagement. Our research into the cat-alystic forces at play promises a meow-velous adventure, as we embark on the pursuit of understanding the unexpected ways in which internet culture intertwines with feline fascination. After all, what's research without a little unexpected humor—just like a good dad joke, it keeps the pursuit of knowledge light-hearted and fun.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and The average number of likes on Tom Scott YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Pawsitively Linked: The Meow-nificent Correlation Between Google Searches for 'Adopt a Cat' and Tom Scott YouTube Video Likes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The purr-pose of this study was to investigate a potential feline-fascinating relationship between the frequency of Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and the average number of likes on Tom Scott's educational and entertaining YouTube videos. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and YouTube to unleash the truth behind this uncharted territory. We found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9666834 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period from 2009 to 2023. Meowsers, talk about a pawsitively meow-nificent discovery!

Our findings reveal a whisker-twirling connection between the search behavior for potential cat adoptions and the engagement with Tom Scott's captivating videos. This phenomenon sheds light on the un-fur-tunate yet hypo-cat-ical truth that feline-related content is captivating attention online. As our research progresses, we aim to explore the underlying causality behind this correlation and delve deeper into the world of internet culture and feline fascination. In the realm of online content, it's clear that the pawsitively captivating allure of potential cat adoption and Tom Scott's intriguing insights are not to be taken lightly. As much as we're feline good about our findings, it's time to whisker away the remaining uncertainties and continue our pursuit of understanding the cat-alystic forces at play in the digital sphere.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introducing our feline-fascinating research endeavor, we set out to explore the enchanting correlation between the frequency of Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and the average number of likes on Tom Scott's YouTube videos. As researchers, we were initially a bit purr-plexed by this peculiar pairing. However, we soon discovered that there's more than meets the eye when it comes to the connection between internet users' penchant for potential feline companions and their engagement with Tom Scott's educational purr-spectives. It's a tale as old as time – or should we say, a tail as old as time?
Meow-ving on to the scientific crux of our endeavor, we delve deep into the realm of data analysis and statistical scrutiny. Our team meticulously combed through the data from Google Trends and YouTube, unleashing a fur-ocious quest to uncover the truth behind this uncharted territory. With our claws sharpened and our curiosity piqued, we dug deep into the numbers to unveil the mystifying correlation lurking in the vast expanse of the internet.
As we meow-nder through the maze of research, we encountered a correlation coefficient of 0.9666834 – a figure that left us feline quite smug, to say the least. This seemingly near-purrrfect correlation was accompanied by a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, leaving us with whiskers twitching with excitement. It's not every day in science that you stumble upon such a remarkable correlation. With such meow-nificent findings in our paws, we couldn't help but paws and reflect on the gravity of our discovery.
However, prowling deeper into the data, we discovered that this correlation is no mere cat-chance occurrence. It speaks volumes about the seemingly inexhaustible appeal of feline-related content in the digital sphere. It's clear as day that internet users are not kitten around when it comes to their fascination with potential cat adoptions and Tom Scott's captivating content. It's an intriguing juxtaposition, to say the least – the timeless allure of feline companionship and the modern allure of educational content, as if the internet has become a playground for cats and curious minds alike.
With our findings laid bare, we embark on a fur-ther quest to untangle the causality behind this captivating correlation. As we embark on this journey, we revel in the thrill of scientific exploration, eager to shed light on the underlying forces at play in the feline-tinged digital landscape. So, let's paws for a moment, contemplate the fur-ther mysteries that await us, and revel in the sheer delight of unraveling the curious connections that lurk in the statistical underbrush.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation of 0.9666834 between the frequency of Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and the average number of likes on Tom Scott's YouTube videos over the period from 2009 to 2023. As statisticians, we were not kitten around when we spotted this correlation. It's safe to say that our research has struck a chord that resonates with both the feline-inclined and statistics-savvy audiences.
In addition to the correlation coefficient, we also calculated the r-squared value, which turned out to be 0.9344767. This not only underscores the strength of the correlation but also suggests that a whopping 93.45% of the variation in Tom Scott's video likes can be explained by the frequency of 'adopt a cat' searches. This finding left us feeling like the cat that got the cream, with a sense of statistical satisfaction that couldn't be paw-verlooked.
The statistical significance of our results is nothing to hiss at either. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently say that the observed correlation is not a mere fluke. It is as solid as the ground under a cat's paws. This p-value is our stamp of approval, declaring that the relationship between potential cat adoptions and Tom Scott's video likes is not to be taken lightly. It's the kind of statistical evidence that's as convincing as a cat's purr.
We also present the visual representation of our findings in Figure 1. The scatterplot depicted in Figure 1 illustrates the strong positive correlation between the two variables. It's quite clear that as the frequency of Google searches for 'adopt a cat' increases, so does the average number of likes on Tom Scott's videos. It's as if the internet cat-astrophe has been beckoning us to uncover this feline-infused phenomenon all along.
Stay tuned, as we continue to paw-se through the wealth of data to unravel the deeper implications and fur-ther insights into this intriguing correlation. Our feline fascination with this connection prompts us to approach the next phase of our research with whiskers twitching in anticipation, ready to meow-vel in the scientific exploration that lies ahead.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

To put it in simple terms, our research has proven that the frequency of Google searches for 'adopt a cat' meow-nificantly influences the average number of likes on Tom Scott's captivating YouTube videos. It's almost as if the internet crowd is saying, "Fur real, we love cats and Tom Scott!" This striking correlation, with a coefficient of 0.9666834 and an r-squared value of 0.9344767, left us feeling like we had hit the jackpot. It's almost as satisfying as a cat finding the sunniest spot to snooze in.

Our findings not only reveal the undeniable appeal of feline-related content online but also the power of statistical analysis in uncovering the purr-fectly unexpected connections lurking in the digital sphere. It's as if statistics has a way of making the cat jump out of the bag when we least expect it! We'll continue to unravel the underlying causality behind this correlation, but for now, it's clear that the internet is under the spell of both cats and Tom Scott.

Now, as much as we're tempted to paw-se and reflect on the fur-tastic journey of this research, it's time to assert emphatically: No more research is needed in this area. We've cracked the cat code, unraveled the mystery behind potential cat adoptions and Tom Scott's video likes, and proven that statistics can be as un-fur-lly as a cat's charm. It's time to move on to new frontiers of exploration – ones that are less paw-sitively enchanting and more statistics-oriented. Let's leave this tail behind and set our sights on meow-ningful scientific endeavors that transcend the captivating allure of cats and internet memes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Pawsitively Linked: The Meow-nificent Correlation Between Google Searches for 'Adopt a Cat' and Tom Scott YouTube Video Likes. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Feline Internet Phenomena


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Pawsitively Linked: The Meow-nificent Correlation Between Google Searches for 'Adopt a Cat' and Tom Scott YouTube Video Likes. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Feline Research Consortium


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Pawsitively Linked: The Meow-nificent Correlation Between Google Searches for 'Adopt a Cat' and Tom Scott YouTube Video Likes with an abstract of The purr-pose of this study was to investigate a potential feline-fascinating relationship between the frequency of Google searches for 'adopt a cat' and the average number of likes on Tom Scott's educational and entertaining YouTube videos. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and YouTube to unleash the truth behind this uncharted territory. We found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9666834 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period from 2009 to 2023. Meowsers, talk about a pawsitively meow-nificent discovery!
Our findings reveal a whisker-twirling connection between the search behavior for potential cat adoptions and the engagement with Tom Scott's captivating videos. This phenomenon sheds light on the un-fur-tunate yet hypo-cat-ical truth that feline-related content is captivating attention online. As our research progresses, we aim to explore the underlying causality behind this correlation and delve deeper into the world of internet culture and feline fascination. In the realm of online content, it's clear that the pawsitively captivating allure of potential cat adoption and Tom Scott's intriguing insights are not to be taken lightly. As much as we're feline good about our findings, it's time to whisker away the remaining uncertainties and continue our pursuit of understanding the cat-alystic forces at play in the digital sphere.

ChatGPT:

'Google searches for adopt a cat', 'Tom Scott YouTube video likes', 'correlation between search behavior and video engagement', 'online content engagement', 'feline fascination', 'causality behind correlation', 'internet culture', 'cat adoption and online engagement', 'digital sphere'

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Google searches for 'adopt a cat'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'adopt a cat' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'adopt a cat'

The average number of likes on Tom Scott's YouTube videos
Detailed data title: The average number of likes on Tom Scott YouTube videos.
Source: Tom Scott's YouTube
See what else correlates with The average number of likes on Tom Scott's YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9666834 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9344767 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The average number of likes on Tom Scott's YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'adopt a cat') over the 15 years from 2009 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.5E-9. 0.0000000045279456680727400000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 4.5E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 220,850,707 random variables You don't actually need 220 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.9, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Google searches for 'adopt a cat' (Rel. search volume)28.833328.583327.333330.583332.2533.7537.083337.541.916747.166752.416785.33337461.333355.7
The average number of likes on Tom Scott's YouTube videos (Average likes)55743.321382627.6716317.363694.530265.739443.946468.269715.9103007101954209050169765132306107917




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([28.8333,28.5833,27.3333,30.5833,32.25,33.75,37.0833,37.5,41.9167,47.1667,52.4167,85.3333,74,61.3333,55.7,])
array_2 = np.array([55743.3,2138,2627.67,16317.3,63694.5,30265.7,39443.9,46468.2,69715.9,103007,101954,209050,169765,132306,107917,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'adopt a cat'"
array_2_name = "The average number of likes on Tom Scott's YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 4675 · Black Variable ID: 1404 · Red Variable ID: 25453
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0