Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the mathematical intensity of the video titles rises, so does the unexpected urge in North Dakota to set things ablaze. It's as if the fiery passion for numbers somehow ignites a spark in the locals, leading to a whole new kind of math - arsons and crafts. Who knew that mathematical comedy could multiply the flames of mischief in the Peace Garden State!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that looks like a scene from 'Star Wars', where in a small town in North Dakota, a group of locals gather around a bonfire, with a mystical glow emanating from the fire. They are laughing and watching their smartphones. On the screens of their phones, there are mesmerizing geometric patterns resembling the mysterious mathematical creativity of the Rubik's Cube. As the light from the bonfire dances across their faces, the locals begin to craft intricate fiery shapes and symbols with flames, filling the night with an otherworldly display of unexpected creativity. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How cool Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and Arson in North Dakota. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute cartoon Brutalism A scene from Skyrim An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Cybernetic art
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How cool Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and Arson in North Dakota, in the following situation: As the mathematical intensity of the video titles rises, so does the unexpected urge in North Dakota to set things ablaze. It's as if the fiery passion for numbers somehow ignites a spark in the locals, leading to a whole new kind of math - arsons and crafts. Who knew that mathematical comedy could multiply the flames of mischief in the Peace Garden State!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small town in North Dakota, a group of locals gather around a bonfire, laughing and watching their smartphones. They are watching a Stand-up Maths video with a title that reads, "The Mind-Blowing Math of Rubik's Cube Patterns!" As the video plays, the locals become increasingly intrigued, and a mischievous glint appears in their eyes. Suddenly, they start grabbing sticks and twigs, igniting small fires and crafting geometric shapes in the flames, creating a fiery spectacle of unexpected mathematical creativity.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' ] and depicting this scene: In a small town in North Dakota, a group of locals gather around a bonfire, laughing and watching their smartphones. They are watching a Stand-up Maths video with a title that reads, "The Mind-Blowing Math of Rubik's Cube Patterns!" As the video plays, the locals become increasingly intrigued, and a mischievous glint appears in their eyes. Suddenly, they start grabbing sticks and twigs, igniting small fires and crafting geometric shapes in the flames, creating a fiery spectacle of unexpected mathematical creativity. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that looks like a scene from 'Star Wars', where in a small town in North Dakota, a group of locals gather around a bonfire, with a mystical glow emanating from the fire. They are laughing and watching their smartphones. On the screens of their phones, there are mesmerizing geometric patterns resembling the mysterious mathematical creativity of the Rubik's Cube. As the light from the bonfire dances across their faces, the locals begin to craft intricate fiery shapes and symbols with flames, filling the night with an otherworldly display of unexpected creativity.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in How cool Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are positively influenced Arson in North Dakota.
AI academic paper
Sizzle and Fizzle: The Relationship Between Stand-up Maths Onscreen Pizzazz and Arson in North Dakota The Journal of Irreverent Mathematics and Unusual Associations Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How cool Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and Arson in North Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Rhyme words in the title.
Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9014246 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Sizzle and Fizzle: The Relationship Between Stand-up Maths Onscreen Pizzazz and Arson in North Dakota"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the unexpected association between the perceived coolness of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and the incidence of arson in North Dakota. Leveraging cutting-edge data analysis techniques, our research team delved into the whimsical world of YouTube video titles and the obscure realm of arson statistics. Through a meticulous examination of the apeal of various mathematical concepts and the occurrence of arson incidents, we employ a whimsical word association algorithm and fire up the mathematical patterns. The results reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9014246, indicating a rather "hot" connection between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings imply that perhaps the fire of mathematical enthusiasm could ignite more than just a passion for numbers. As we shed light on this unexpected relationship, the puns were certainly not intended but inevitably slipped in like an unexpected punchline in the dry world of academic research.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How cool Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and Arson in North Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Sizzle and Fizzle: The Relationship Between Stand-up Maths Onscreen Pizzazz and Arson in North Dakota"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the unexpected association between the perceived coolness of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and the incidence of arson in North Dakota. Leveraging cutting-edge data analysis techniques, our research team delved into the whimsical world of YouTube video titles and the obscure realm of arson statistics. Through a meticulous examination of the apeal of various mathematical concepts and the occurrence of arson incidents, we employ a whimsical word association algorithm and fire up the mathematical patterns. The results reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9014246, indicating a rather "hot" connection between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings imply that perhaps the fire of mathematical enthusiasm could ignite more than just a passion for numbers. As we shed light on this unexpected relationship, the puns were certainly not intended but inevitably slipped in like an unexpected punchline in the dry world of academic research.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the delightful world of academic research, one occasionally stumbles upon unexpected and quirky connections that spark curiosity and challenge conventional wisdom. The current study embarks on an entertaining quest to unravel the peculiar and rather "hot" relationship between the coolness factor of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and the incidence of arson in the charming state of North Dakota. While these seemingly disparate subject areas may appear to be as unrelated as pi and a plate of cookies, our whimsical minds dared to investigate the potential link between the sizzle of mathematical onscreen pizzazz and the fizzle of arson incidents.
As any astute observer of human behavior will appreciate, the allure of a well-crafted video title is akin to the tempting aroma of freshly baked hypothesis with a sprinkling of statistical significance. The captivating nature of mathematical concepts, when imbued with just the right amount of onscreen flair, may indeed evoke an incendiary response from enthusiasts of numerical quirkiness. This research, though indeed a departure from traditional statistical inquiries, reflects our unwavering commitment to shedding light on the unexpected and, dare we say, "explosive" connections that resonate within the complex fabric of human experience.
Through the lens of whimsy and rigorous analysis, this study aims to ignite both curiosity and amusement, much like a well-timed punchline in the routine world of scholarly investigation. With careful consideration of statistical methods and the endearing charm of Stand-up Maths, we endeavor to unravel the mystery of this unlikely partnership and ignite a flame of intellectual curiosity that burns as brightly as a statistically significant p-value.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How cool Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and Arson in North Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Sizzle and Fizzle: The Relationship Between Stand-up Maths Onscreen Pizzazz and Arson in North Dakota"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the unexpected association between the perceived coolness of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and the incidence of arson in North Dakota. Leveraging cutting-edge data analysis techniques, our research team delved into the whimsical world of YouTube video titles and the obscure realm of arson statistics. Through a meticulous examination of the apeal of various mathematical concepts and the occurrence of arson incidents, we employ a whimsical word association algorithm and fire up the mathematical patterns. The results reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9014246, indicating a rather "hot" connection between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings imply that perhaps the fire of mathematical enthusiasm could ignite more than just a passion for numbers. As we shed light on this unexpected relationship, the puns were certainly not intended but inevitably slipped in like an unexpected punchline in the dry world of academic research.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the delightful world of academic research, one occasionally stumbles upon unexpected and quirky connections that spark curiosity and challenge conventional wisdom. The current study embarks on an entertaining quest to unravel the peculiar and rather "hot" relationship between the coolness factor of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and the incidence of arson in the charming state of North Dakota. While these seemingly disparate subject areas may appear to be as unrelated as pi and a plate of cookies, our whimsical minds dared to investigate the potential link between the sizzle of mathematical onscreen pizzazz and the fizzle of arson incidents.
As any astute observer of human behavior will appreciate, the allure of a well-crafted video title is akin to the tempting aroma of freshly baked hypothesis with a sprinkling of statistical significance. The captivating nature of mathematical concepts, when imbued with just the right amount of onscreen flair, may indeed evoke an incendiary response from enthusiasts of numerical quirkiness. This research, though indeed a departure from traditional statistical inquiries, reflects our unwavering commitment to shedding light on the unexpected and, dare we say, "explosive" connections that resonate within the complex fabric of human experience.
Through the lens of whimsy and rigorous analysis, this study aims to ignite both curiosity and amusement, much like a well-timed punchline in the routine world of scholarly investigation. With careful consideration of statistical methods and the endearing charm of Stand-up Maths, we endeavor to unravel the mystery of this unlikely partnership and ignite a flame of intellectual curiosity that burns as brightly as a statistically significant p-value.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The current inquiry ventures into the unexplored territory of the Stand-up Maths YouTube channel, conceived by Matt Parker, and its potential connection to arson incidents in North Dakota. While this enigmatic relationship may at first seem as unlikely as squaring the circle, the literature reveals some promising leads that spark captivating curiosity akin to a well-placed punchline.
Smith (2018) delved into the realm of YouTube video title effectiveness, uncovering the subtle intricacies of linguistic appeal and visual intrigue in engaging viewers. Doe et al. (2019) further explored the psychology of online engagement, shedding light on the mysterious allure of mathematical concepts presented in an entertaining manner.
In a rather unconventional turn, Jones (2020) ventured into the statistical analysis of arson patterns and spatial distribution within North Dakota, laying the groundwork for our present investigation. However, the leap from statistical analysis of arson incidents to the appeal of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles may initially seem as perplexing as calculating the area of a Möbius strip.
Turning to non-fiction works that could illuminate this unexpected intersection, "The Joy of x: A Guided Tour of Mathematics, from One to Infinity" by Steven Strogatz and "The Art of Statistics: Learning from Data" by David Spiegelhalter contribute a mathematical lens to our inquiry. These works bring a dose of academic rigor to our whimsical exploration of the connection between mathematical pizzazz and fire-related incidents.
Furthermore, fiction novels such as "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown and "Fahrenheit 451" by Ray Bradbury, while not directly tied to our subject matter, evoke an aura of intrigue, mystery, and creative storytelling that aligns with the spirit of our investigation. The unexpected twists and turns found in these works mirror our current academic journey, as we seek to unravel the peculiar correlation between seemingly unrelated phenomena.
In the realm of popular cultural phenomena, the timeless "This is fine" meme embodies the concept of maintaining a positive demeanor in the face of impending catastrophe, perhaps offering a metaphorical reflection on the unexpected correlations we seek to uncover. Conversely, the "Math Lady" meme playfully captures the fleeting moments of mathematical revelation and bafflement, resonating with the quixotic nature of our study's endeavor.
As we navigate through the labyrinth of academic literature and cultural references, the fusion of mathematical whimsy and fiery intrigue ignites the spark of creativity and intellectual curiosity, transforming this seemingly peculiar investigation into a delightful quest for knowledge.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How cool Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and Arson in North Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 2011 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Sizzle and Fizzle: The Relationship Between Stand-up Maths Onscreen Pizzazz and Arson in North Dakota"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the unexpected association between the perceived coolness of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and the incidence of arson in North Dakota. Leveraging cutting-edge data analysis techniques, our research team delved into the whimsical world of YouTube video titles and the obscure realm of arson statistics. Through a meticulous examination of the apeal of various mathematical concepts and the occurrence of arson incidents, we employ a whimsical word association algorithm and fire up the mathematical patterns. The results reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9014246, indicating a rather "hot" connection between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings imply that perhaps the fire of mathematical enthusiasm could ignite more than just a passion for numbers. As we shed light on this unexpected relationship, the puns were certainly not intended but inevitably slipped in like an unexpected punchline in the dry world of academic research.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the delightful world of academic research, one occasionally stumbles upon unexpected and quirky connections that spark curiosity and challenge conventional wisdom. The current study embarks on an entertaining quest to unravel the peculiar and rather "hot" relationship between the coolness factor of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and the incidence of arson in the charming state of North Dakota. While these seemingly disparate subject areas may appear to be as unrelated as pi and a plate of cookies, our whimsical minds dared to investigate the potential link between the sizzle of mathematical onscreen pizzazz and the fizzle of arson incidents.
As any astute observer of human behavior will appreciate, the allure of a well-crafted video title is akin to the tempting aroma of freshly baked hypothesis with a sprinkling of statistical significance. The captivating nature of mathematical concepts, when imbued with just the right amount of onscreen flair, may indeed evoke an incendiary response from enthusiasts of numerical quirkiness. This research, though indeed a departure from traditional statistical inquiries, reflects our unwavering commitment to shedding light on the unexpected and, dare we say, "explosive" connections that resonate within the complex fabric of human experience.
Through the lens of whimsy and rigorous analysis, this study aims to ignite both curiosity and amusement, much like a well-timed punchline in the routine world of scholarly investigation. With careful consideration of statistical methods and the endearing charm of Stand-up Maths, we endeavor to unravel the mystery of this unlikely partnership and ignite a flame of intellectual curiosity that burns as brightly as a statistically significant p-value.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In a research endeavor as lighthearted as ours, the methodology embraced a blend of unconventional approaches and traditional statistical techniques for a flavorful concoction of data analysis. To begin, we harnessed the power of AI technology to scour the depths of the internet, specifically the Stand-up Maths YouTube channel, extracting a plethora of video titles from 2011 to 2022. Through a whimsical word association algorithm, we evaluated the perceived coolness and pizzazz of these titles, factoring in the presence of mathematical puns, enigmatic references, and the occasional eureka moment in the title construction process. Our team endured countless chuckles and raised eyebrows at the unexpected wit and irreverent charm of these mathematical musings, all in the name of rigorous scientific inquiry.
Simultaneously, while we gallivanted in the lighthearted terrain of YouTube videos, we summoned data from the archives of the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, focusing our gaze on the peculiar phenomena of arson in the picturesque state of North Dakota. Our data mining escapades yielded a comprehensive dataset of arson incidents, meticulously accounting for location, frequency, and any conspicuous correlation to mathematical legerdemain.
With our whimsical datasets in hand, we invoked the stalwart tools of statistical analysis, endeavoring to discern any latent associations that transcend the realms of probability and the improbable. A series of correlation analyses danced on the stage of our statistical software, twirling gracefully to the beat of unexpected discoveries and eyebrow-raising coefficients.
Our delightful foray into quantitative analysis, buoyed by the infectious energy of Stand-up Maths and the enigma of arson statistics, ultimately unveiled a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9014246. This peculiarly high coefficient, much like a jest unexpectedly well-received, indicated a remarkably "hot" connection between the perceived coolness of video titles and the occurrence of arson incidents - a most unexpected yet intriguing finding.
Indeed, our methodology, while adorned with whimsical data sources and statistical acrobatics, highlights the blend of unabated curiosity and methodological rigor that characterizes the irreverent world of academic inquiry. As we reflect on our journey through YouTube antics and the enigma of arson, we recognize that, in the realm of research, there is always room for a spark of whimsy and an unexpected twist in the statistical tale.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How cool Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and Arson in North Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .
For the time period 2011 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9014246, r-squared of 0.8125664, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Sizzle and Fizzle: The Relationship Between Stand-up Maths Onscreen Pizzazz and Arson in North Dakota"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the unexpected association between the perceived coolness of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and the incidence of arson in North Dakota. Leveraging cutting-edge data analysis techniques, our research team delved into the whimsical world of YouTube video titles and the obscure realm of arson statistics. Through a meticulous examination of the apeal of various mathematical concepts and the occurrence of arson incidents, we employ a whimsical word association algorithm and fire up the mathematical patterns. The results reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9014246, indicating a rather "hot" connection between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings imply that perhaps the fire of mathematical enthusiasm could ignite more than just a passion for numbers. As we shed light on this unexpected relationship, the puns were certainly not intended but inevitably slipped in like an unexpected punchline in the dry world of academic research.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the delightful world of academic research, one occasionally stumbles upon unexpected and quirky connections that spark curiosity and challenge conventional wisdom. The current study embarks on an entertaining quest to unravel the peculiar and rather "hot" relationship between the coolness factor of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and the incidence of arson in the charming state of North Dakota. While these seemingly disparate subject areas may appear to be as unrelated as pi and a plate of cookies, our whimsical minds dared to investigate the potential link between the sizzle of mathematical onscreen pizzazz and the fizzle of arson incidents.
As any astute observer of human behavior will appreciate, the allure of a well-crafted video title is akin to the tempting aroma of freshly baked hypothesis with a sprinkling of statistical significance. The captivating nature of mathematical concepts, when imbued with just the right amount of onscreen flair, may indeed evoke an incendiary response from enthusiasts of numerical quirkiness. This research, though indeed a departure from traditional statistical inquiries, reflects our unwavering commitment to shedding light on the unexpected and, dare we say, "explosive" connections that resonate within the complex fabric of human experience.
Through the lens of whimsy and rigorous analysis, this study aims to ignite both curiosity and amusement, much like a well-timed punchline in the routine world of scholarly investigation. With careful consideration of statistical methods and the endearing charm of Stand-up Maths, we endeavor to unravel the mystery of this unlikely partnership and ignite a flame of intellectual curiosity that burns as brightly as a statistically significant p-value.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the data collected from the intriguing intersection of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and arson incidents in North Dakota, our research team uncovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9014246. This statistically significant finding displays a strong positive relationship between the perceived coolness of the video titles and the occurrence of arson in the charming state of North Dakota.
The calculated r-squared value of 0.8125664 further reinforces the robustness of this association, indicating that approximately 81.26% of the variability in arson incidents can be explained by the sizzle of mathematical onscreen pizzazz.
With a p-value of less than 0.01, the evidence overwhelmingly points to a genuine connection, affirming the notion that the enthralling allure of mathematical concepts, when cloaked in onscreen charisma, may indeed spark a rather "hot" response in individuals, potentially leading to the unexpected fizzle of arson incidents.
As represented in Figure 1, the scatterplot vividly illustrates the compelling correlation between the two variables, emphasizing the "fiery" link that defies conventional expectations.
In essence, the findings of this study illuminate a quirky and unexpected relationship, where the eccentric charm of mathematical video titles converges with a most unexpected phenomenon. While the inclusion of humor and puns in academic research is typically frowned upon, the unavoidably amusing nature of this connection serves as a delightful reminder that even in the rigorous realm of scholarly inquiry, one can stumble upon whimsical associations that ignite the imagination and "fan the flames" of scientific discourse.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How cool Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and Arson in North Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"Sizzle and Fizzle: The Relationship Between Stand-up Maths Onscreen Pizzazz and Arson in North Dakota"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the unexpected association between the perceived coolness of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and the incidence of arson in North Dakota. Leveraging cutting-edge data analysis techniques, our research team delved into the whimsical world of YouTube video titles and the obscure realm of arson statistics. Through a meticulous examination of the apeal of various mathematical concepts and the occurrence of arson incidents, we employ a whimsical word association algorithm and fire up the mathematical patterns. The results reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9014246, indicating a rather "hot" connection between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings imply that perhaps the fire of mathematical enthusiasm could ignite more than just a passion for numbers. As we shed light on this unexpected relationship, the puns were certainly not intended but inevitably slipped in like an unexpected punchline in the dry world of academic research.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The current inquiry ventures into the unexplored territory of the Stand-up Maths YouTube channel, conceived by Matt Parker, and its potential connection to arson incidents in North Dakota. While this enigmatic relationship may at first seem as unlikely as squaring the circle, the literature reveals some promising leads that spark captivating curiosity akin to a well-placed punchline.
Smith (2018) delved into the realm of YouTube video title effectiveness, uncovering the subtle intricacies of linguistic appeal and visual intrigue in engaging viewers. Doe et al. (2019) further explored the psychology of online engagement, shedding light on the mysterious allure of mathematical concepts presented in an entertaining manner.
In a rather unconventional turn, Jones (2020) ventured into the statistical analysis of arson patterns and spatial distribution within North Dakota, laying the groundwork for our present investigation. However, the leap from statistical analysis of arson incidents to the appeal of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles may initially seem as perplexing as calculating the area of a Möbius strip.
Turning to non-fiction works that could illuminate this unexpected intersection, "The Joy of x: A Guided Tour of Mathematics, from One to Infinity" by Steven Strogatz and "The Art of Statistics: Learning from Data" by David Spiegelhalter contribute a mathematical lens to our inquiry. These works bring a dose of academic rigor to our whimsical exploration of the connection between mathematical pizzazz and fire-related incidents.
Furthermore, fiction novels such as "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown and "Fahrenheit 451" by Ray Bradbury, while not directly tied to our subject matter, evoke an aura of intrigue, mystery, and creative storytelling that aligns with the spirit of our investigation. The unexpected twists and turns found in these works mirror our current academic journey, as we seek to unravel the peculiar correlation between seemingly unrelated phenomena.
In the realm of popular cultural phenomena, the timeless "This is fine" meme embodies the concept of maintaining a positive demeanor in the face of impending catastrophe, perhaps offering a metaphorical reflection on the unexpected correlations we seek to uncover. Conversely, the "Math Lady" meme playfully captures the fleeting moments of mathematical revelation and bafflement, resonating with the quixotic nature of our study's endeavor.
As we navigate through the labyrinth of academic literature and cultural references, the fusion of mathematical whimsy and fiery intrigue ignites the spark of creativity and intellectual curiosity, transforming this seemingly peculiar investigation into a delightful quest for knowledge.
[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the data collected from the intriguing intersection of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and arson incidents in North Dakota, our research team uncovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9014246. This statistically significant finding displays a strong positive relationship between the perceived coolness of the video titles and the occurrence of arson in the charming state of North Dakota.
The calculated r-squared value of 0.8125664 further reinforces the robustness of this association, indicating that approximately 81.26% of the variability in arson incidents can be explained by the sizzle of mathematical onscreen pizzazz.
With a p-value of less than 0.01, the evidence overwhelmingly points to a genuine connection, affirming the notion that the enthralling allure of mathematical concepts, when cloaked in onscreen charisma, may indeed spark a rather "hot" response in individuals, potentially leading to the unexpected fizzle of arson incidents.
As represented in Figure 1, the scatterplot vividly illustrates the compelling correlation between the two variables, emphasizing the "fiery" link that defies conventional expectations.
In essence, the findings of this study illuminate a quirky and unexpected relationship, where the eccentric charm of mathematical video titles converges with a most unexpected phenomenon. While the inclusion of humor and puns in academic research is typically frowned upon, the unavoidably amusing nature of this connection serves as a delightful reminder that even in the rigorous realm of scholarly inquiry, one can stumble upon whimsical associations that ignite the imagination and "fan the flames" of scientific discourse.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The results of our study provide compelling evidence for the unanticipated link between the perceived coolness of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and the occurrence of arson in North Dakota. While the correlation coefficient speaks volumes about the fiery connection, it's worth noting that this association may seem as surprising as an unexpected punchline in a statistical analysis. However, our findings align with previous research that delved into the psychology of online engagement and linguistic appeal. Just as complex mathematical concepts can captivate and enthrall, our study's results suggest that the allure of mathematical pizzazz could indeed blaze a trail to fiery consequences.
The echoing resonance of the scatterplot vividly emphasizes the "fiery" link between the variables, akin to the way a well-placed punchline reverberates with the audience. The robustness of this association, as evidenced by the calculated r-squared value, echoes the resounding impact of a scientifically sound pun. Moreover, the p-value's significance stokes excitement and affirms the genuine connection we have uncovered, akin to the applause that follows a well-crafted punchline.
Our findings resonate with the whimsical nature of our literature review, where the innovative fusion of mathematical intrigue and fiery mystique mirrors a serendipitous connection akin to a witty blend of numbers and humor. Indeed, the unexpected twists and turns in our academic exploration parallel the captivating storytelling found in the works of fiction authors we referred to, as if our study were a tale of intrigue and discovery in itself.
In conclusion, this investigation reveals a captivating bond between seemingly disparate entities, inviting future researchers to kindle the flames of curiosity and explore similarly whimsical correlations that sparkle like a well-timed mathematical pun. As our study demonstrates, academic inquiry need not always adhere to a strict seriousness; sometimes, the most unexpected correlations provide a delightful spark of creativity, fostering a narrative that blends the scholarly with the entertaining.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How cool Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and Arson in North Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Sizzle and Fizzle: The Relationship Between Stand-up Maths Onscreen Pizzazz and Arson in North Dakota"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the unexpected association between the perceived coolness of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and the incidence of arson in North Dakota. Leveraging cutting-edge data analysis techniques, our research team delved into the whimsical world of YouTube video titles and the obscure realm of arson statistics. Through a meticulous examination of the apeal of various mathematical concepts and the occurrence of arson incidents, we employ a whimsical word association algorithm and fire up the mathematical patterns. The results reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9014246, indicating a rather "hot" connection between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings imply that perhaps the fire of mathematical enthusiasm could ignite more than just a passion for numbers. As we shed light on this unexpected relationship, the puns were certainly not intended but inevitably slipped in like an unexpected punchline in the dry world of academic research.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the delightful world of academic research, one occasionally stumbles upon unexpected and quirky connections that spark curiosity and challenge conventional wisdom. The current study embarks on an entertaining quest to unravel the peculiar and rather "hot" relationship between the coolness factor of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and the incidence of arson in the charming state of North Dakota. While these seemingly disparate subject areas may appear to be as unrelated as pi and a plate of cookies, our whimsical minds dared to investigate the potential link between the sizzle of mathematical onscreen pizzazz and the fizzle of arson incidents.
As any astute observer of human behavior will appreciate, the allure of a well-crafted video title is akin to the tempting aroma of freshly baked hypothesis with a sprinkling of statistical significance. The captivating nature of mathematical concepts, when imbued with just the right amount of onscreen flair, may indeed evoke an incendiary response from enthusiasts of numerical quirkiness. This research, though indeed a departure from traditional statistical inquiries, reflects our unwavering commitment to shedding light on the unexpected and, dare we say, "explosive" connections that resonate within the complex fabric of human experience.
Through the lens of whimsy and rigorous analysis, this study aims to ignite both curiosity and amusement, much like a well-timed punchline in the routine world of scholarly investigation. With careful consideration of statistical methods and the endearing charm of Stand-up Maths, we endeavor to unravel the mystery of this unlikely partnership and ignite a flame of intellectual curiosity that burns as brightly as a statistically significant p-value.
[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the data collected from the intriguing intersection of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and arson incidents in North Dakota, our research team uncovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9014246. This statistically significant finding displays a strong positive relationship between the perceived coolness of the video titles and the occurrence of arson in the charming state of North Dakota.
The calculated r-squared value of 0.8125664 further reinforces the robustness of this association, indicating that approximately 81.26% of the variability in arson incidents can be explained by the sizzle of mathematical onscreen pizzazz.
With a p-value of less than 0.01, the evidence overwhelmingly points to a genuine connection, affirming the notion that the enthralling allure of mathematical concepts, when cloaked in onscreen charisma, may indeed spark a rather "hot" response in individuals, potentially leading to the unexpected fizzle of arson incidents.
As represented in Figure 1, the scatterplot vividly illustrates the compelling correlation between the two variables, emphasizing the "fiery" link that defies conventional expectations.
In essence, the findings of this study illuminate a quirky and unexpected relationship, where the eccentric charm of mathematical video titles converges with a most unexpected phenomenon. While the inclusion of humor and puns in academic research is typically frowned upon, the unavoidably amusing nature of this connection serves as a delightful reminder that even in the rigorous realm of scholarly inquiry, one can stumble upon whimsical associations that ignite the imagination and "fan the flames" of scientific discourse.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our research has successfully illuminated a rather "fiery" relationship between the coolness of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and the occurrence of arson in North Dakota. As our findings reveal, the allure of mathematical concepts, when presented with the right amount of onscreen pizzazz, can certainly spark more than just intellectual curiosity. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9014246 serves as a testament to the unexpected convergence of sizzle and fizzle in this whimsical realm of academic exploration.
With due respect to the solemnity of scholarly research, our study underscores the occasional presence of delightful puns and hidden sparks of humor amidst the rigors of statistical analysis. The whimsical word association algorithm, though initially implemented with a straight face, unexpectedly unveiled a tapestry of amusing connections that could rival the most cunning punchlines. It is a delightful reminder that even in the seemingly austere landscape of academic inquiry, the unexpected can spark not just curiosity but a few chuckles along the way.
Before lighting any more fires of inquiry in this offbeat area of research, we assert that no further investigations are needed. This study, while an enjoyable romp through the unexpected, now stands as a lighthearted reminder that in the world of research, even the most seemingly disparate variables can indeed ignite a flame of curiosity.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Sizzle and Fizzle: The Relationship Between Stand-up Maths Onscreen Pizzazz and Arson in North Dakota. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Irreverent Mathematics and Unusual Associations
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Sizzle and Fizzle: The Relationship Between Stand-up Maths Onscreen Pizzazz and Arson in North Dakota. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Ludicrous Correlations
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Sizzle and Fizzle: The Relationship Between Stand-up Maths Onscreen Pizzazz and Arson in North Dakota with an abstract of This study examines the unexpected association between the perceived coolness of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and the incidence of arson in North Dakota. Leveraging cutting-edge data analysis techniques, our research team delved into the whimsical world of YouTube video titles and the obscure realm of arson statistics. Through a meticulous examination of the apeal of various mathematical concepts and the occurrence of arson incidents, we employ a whimsical word association algorithm and fire up the mathematical patterns. The results reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9014246, indicating a rather "hot" connection between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings imply that perhaps the fire of mathematical enthusiasm could ignite more than just a passion for numbers. As we shed light on this unexpected relationship, the puns were certainly not intended but inevitably slipped in like an unexpected punchline in the dry world of academic research.
ChatGPT:
Stand-up Maths, YouTube, video titles, arson, North Dakota, data analysis, mathematical concepts, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, whimsical word association algorithm, arson statistics, mathematical patterns, passion for numbers
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
How cool Matt Parker's YouTube video titles areDetailed data title: How cool Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.
See what else correlates with How cool Matt Parker's YouTube video titles are
Arson in North Dakota
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in North Dakota
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in North Dakota
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8125664 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Arson in North Dakota) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How cool Matt Parker's YouTube video titles are) over the 12 years from 2011 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.2E-5. 0.0000619971778779169500000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 0.0062% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 16,130 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.68, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
How cool Matt Parker's YouTube video titles are (Coolness score (out of 10)) | 7 | 6.3333 | 7.3333 | 8.5 | 6.2 | 6.449 | 6.8 | 6.3333 | 6.4483 | 6.9714 | 6.4 | 6.6316 |
Arson in North Dakota (Arson rate) | 11.5 | 14.7 | 20.7 | 28 | 10.3 | 12.3 | 14.7 | 8 | 11 | 14.2 | 13.9 | 12.4 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7,6.3333,7.3333,8.5,6.2,6.449,6.8,6.3333,6.4483,6.9714,6.4,6.6316,])
array_2 = np.array([11.5,14.7,20.7,28,10.3,12.3,14.7,8,11,14.2,13.9,12.4,])
array_1_name = "How cool Matt Parker's YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Arson in North Dakota"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only How cool Matt Parker's YouTube video titles are
- Line chart for only Arson in North Dakota
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Sizzle and Fizzle: The Relationship Between Stand-up Maths Onscreen Pizzazz and Arson in North Dakota
You're a rater extraordinaire!
Correlation ID: 4622 · Black Variable ID: 25798 · Red Variable ID: 20062