Report an error
Arson in North Dakota correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Biomass power generated in Sierra Leone | r=0.93 | 8yrs | No |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Germany, West | r=0.92 | 6yrs | No |
How cool Matt Parker's YouTube video titles are | r=0.9 | 12yrs | Yes! |
Patents granted to Kia | r=0.81 | 11yrs | No |
The number of special education teachers in North Dakota | r=0.73 | 11yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Yemen | r=0.66 | 37yrs | Yes! |
The distance between Uranus and Venus | r=0.58 | 38yrs | Yes! |
The distance between Uranus and Saturn | r=0.56 | 38yrs | No |
Arson in North Dakota also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)