about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,593 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Associates degrees awarded in gender studies and the second variable is Total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As the number of Associates degrees awarded in gender studies rose, so did the average length of The Game Theorists' videos. This is likely due to the ripple effect of in-depth analysis - or as we like to call it, the gender study guide to video lengthening. With a greater focus on critical thinking and societal norms, it's only natural that the content became more gender-inclusive, leading to longer discussions and a broader perspective. It's truly a case of thesis-antithesis-video-synthesis!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a university hall filled with graduates proudly holding their Associates degrees in gender studies. The graduates should be depicted in a cubist style, with angular shapes and fractured forms to capture the essence of cubism. A large screen nearby should display the Game Theorists' YouTube videos, with each video growing longer as the gender-inclusive analysis unfolds. The screen can also be depicted in a cubist manner, with fragmented shapes and abstract patterns to convey the influence of gender studies on the content and length of the videos. The overall scene should exude an energetic and introspective atmosphere, emphasizing the critical thinking and societal introspection associated with gender studies. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Associates degrees awarded in gender studies and Total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Parallax art Cute 2D animation Cubism An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Cubism
ChatGPT: Cubism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Associates degrees awarded in gender studies and Total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos, in the following situation: As the number of Associates degrees awarded in gender studies rose, so did the average length of The Game Theorists' videos. This is likely due to the ripple effect of in-depth analysis - or as we like to call it, the gender study guide to video lengthening. With a greater focus on critical thinking and societal norms, it's only natural that the content became more gender-inclusive, leading to longer discussions and a broader perspective. It's truly a case of thesis-antithesis-video-synthesis!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the bustling halls of a university, graduates proudly receive their Associates degrees in gender studies, their faces beaming with accomplishment. Meanwhile, on a nearby screen, the Game Theorists' YouTube videos play, each one growing gradually longer as the gender-inclusive analysis unfolds on the screen. The atmosphere is charged with the energy of critical thinking and societal introspection, reflecting the growing influence of gender studies on the content and length of the videos.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cubism ] and depicting this scene: In the bustling halls of a university, graduates proudly receive their Associates degrees in gender studies, their faces beaming with accomplishment. Meanwhile, on a nearby screen, the Game Theorists' YouTube videos play, each one growing gradually longer as the gender-inclusive analysis unfolds on the screen. The atmosphere is charged with the energy of critical thinking and societal introspection, reflecting the growing influence of gender studies on the content and length of the videos. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a university hall filled with graduates proudly holding their Associates degrees in gender studies. The graduates should be depicted in a cubist style, with angular shapes and fractured forms to capture the essence of cubism. A large screen nearby should display the Game Theorists' YouTube videos, with each video growing longer as the gender-inclusive analysis unfolds. The screen can also be depicted in a cubist manner, with fragmented shapes and abstract patterns to convey the influence of gender studies on the content and length of the videos. The overall scene should exude an energetic and introspective atmosphere, emphasizing the critical thinking and societal introspection associated with gender studies.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Associates degrees awarded in gender studies caused Total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Gender Gap in Game Theory: Grasping the Grandiosity of Gender Studies Graduates' Gain on The Game Theorists

The Journal of Playful Economics

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in gender studies and Total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9655825 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Gender Gap in Game Theory: Grasping the Grandiosity of Gender Studies Graduates' Gain on The Game Theorists

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the whimsical world of academia, exploring the unexpected connection between the number of associate degrees awarded in gender studies and the total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9655825 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021. The results are a testament to the synergistic interaction between seemingly disparate fields and highlight the manifold impacts of gender studies graduates on the enigmatic expanse of game theory content. This paper aims to provide a light-hearted yet thought-provoking perspective on the intersection of academia and popular culture, reminding us that even in the serious world of research, the game of humor and curiosity is always afoot.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in gender studies and Total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Gender Gap in Game Theory: Grasping the Grandiosity of Gender Studies Graduates' Gain on The Game Theorists

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the whimsical world of academia, exploring the unexpected connection between the number of associate degrees awarded in gender studies and the total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9655825 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021. The results are a testament to the synergistic interaction between seemingly disparate fields and highlight the manifold impacts of gender studies graduates on the enigmatic expanse of game theory content. This paper aims to provide a light-hearted yet thought-provoking perspective on the intersection of academia and popular culture, reminding us that even in the serious world of research, the game of humor and curiosity is always afoot.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the delightful realm of academia, where logic and laughter often collide, we find ourselves captivated by the incongruity of gender studies and the dimensions of The Game Theorists' YouTube oeuvre. The seemingly whimsical yet surprisingly compelling association between the number of associate degrees awarded in gender studies and the total length of The Game Theorists' YouTube videos has piqued our scholarly curiosity.

While some might assume this connection to be as elusive as the quest for the perfect pun, our investigation has unearthed a remarkably strong correlation between these two variables. Indeed, the statistical results have defied expectations, prompting us to embrace the delightful dance of data analysis and the whimsical waltz of YouTube content.

As we embark on this academic escapade, our goal is to offer a lighthearted yet empirically grounded exploration of this serendipitous synergy. Through the lens of statistical analysis and the camaraderie of comedic observation, we aim to shed light on the captivating interplay between gender studies graduates and the engrossing domain of game theory content. After all, in the grand symphony of academia, it is not uncommon for the most unexpected duets to create unforgettable melodies of insight and amusement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in gender studies and Total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Gender Gap in Game Theory: Grasping the Grandiosity of Gender Studies Graduates' Gain on The Game Theorists

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the whimsical world of academia, exploring the unexpected connection between the number of associate degrees awarded in gender studies and the total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9655825 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021. The results are a testament to the synergistic interaction between seemingly disparate fields and highlight the manifold impacts of gender studies graduates on the enigmatic expanse of game theory content. This paper aims to provide a light-hearted yet thought-provoking perspective on the intersection of academia and popular culture, reminding us that even in the serious world of research, the game of humor and curiosity is always afoot.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the delightful realm of academia, where logic and laughter often collide, we find ourselves captivated by the incongruity of gender studies and the dimensions of The Game Theorists' YouTube oeuvre. The seemingly whimsical yet surprisingly compelling association between the number of associate degrees awarded in gender studies and the total length of The Game Theorists' YouTube videos has piqued our scholarly curiosity.
While some might assume this connection to be as elusive as the quest for the perfect pun, our investigation has unearthed a remarkably strong correlation between these two variables. Indeed, the statistical results have defied expectations, prompting us to embrace the delightful dance of data analysis and the whimsical waltz of YouTube content.
As we embark on this academic escapade, our goal is to offer a lighthearted yet empirically grounded exploration of this serendipitous synergy. Through the lens of statistical analysis and the camaraderie of comedic observation, we aim to shed light on the captivating interplay between gender studies graduates and the engrossing domain of game theory content. After all, in the grand symphony of academia, it is not uncommon for the most unexpected duets to create unforgettable melodies of insight and amusement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith (2015) examines the correlation between the number of associate degrees awarded in gender studies and the length of The Game Theorists' YouTube videos and finds a surprisingly strong positive relationship. Similarly, Doe (2017) underscores the impact of gender studies graduates on the landscape of online content creation, highlighting the profound influence of their perspectives on game theory-themed videos. Jones (2019) further elaborates on the intersection of gender studies and digital media, elucidating the intricate dynamics that underpin the captivating connection between academic pursuits and popular culture.

In "The Gendered Game: Exploring Identity and Power in Digital Spaces," the authors delve into the role of gender in shaping online gaming experiences, providing a comprehensive examination of the societal implications of gender representation in digital realms. Meanwhile, "Game Theory and Gender: Exploring Diverse Perspectives" offers a compelling analysis of the ways in which gender studies principles intersect with the intricate frameworks of game theory, showcasing the breadth of influence that gender-focused academic disciplines can have on digital content creation.

Turning to fictional works that might offer tangential insights, "The Gender Paradox: A Tale of Daring Discovery" and "The Game Theorist's Dilemma: An Enigmatic Exploration" present whimsical narratives that touch upon the confluence of gender studies and game theory, intertwining elements of mystery and humor to create an engaging backdrop for scholarly inquiry. Furthermore, movies such as "Game Theory: The Gender Chronicles" and "Gender Studies in the Game of Theorists" provide an entertaining yet thought-provoking glimpse into the realms of academic pursuits and online content creation, offering inspiration for the playful yet insightful exploration of our research topic.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in gender studies and Total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube . You used data from 2011 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Gender Gap in Game Theory: Grasping the Grandiosity of Gender Studies Graduates' Gain on The Game Theorists

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the whimsical world of academia, exploring the unexpected connection between the number of associate degrees awarded in gender studies and the total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9655825 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021. The results are a testament to the synergistic interaction between seemingly disparate fields and highlight the manifold impacts of gender studies graduates on the enigmatic expanse of game theory content. This paper aims to provide a light-hearted yet thought-provoking perspective on the intersection of academia and popular culture, reminding us that even in the serious world of research, the game of humor and curiosity is always afoot.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the delightful realm of academia, where logic and laughter often collide, we find ourselves captivated by the incongruity of gender studies and the dimensions of The Game Theorists' YouTube oeuvre. The seemingly whimsical yet surprisingly compelling association between the number of associate degrees awarded in gender studies and the total length of The Game Theorists' YouTube videos has piqued our scholarly curiosity.
While some might assume this connection to be as elusive as the quest for the perfect pun, our investigation has unearthed a remarkably strong correlation between these two variables. Indeed, the statistical results have defied expectations, prompting us to embrace the delightful dance of data analysis and the whimsical waltz of YouTube content.
As we embark on this academic escapade, our goal is to offer a lighthearted yet empirically grounded exploration of this serendipitous synergy. Through the lens of statistical analysis and the camaraderie of comedic observation, we aim to shed light on the captivating interplay between gender studies graduates and the engrossing domain of game theory content. After all, in the grand symphony of academia, it is not uncommon for the most unexpected duets to create unforgettable melodies of insight and amusement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this study encapsulates a whimsical yet rigorous approach, mirroring the delightful interplay between gender studies and the enigmatic domain of game theory content. Our research team undertook an extensive data collection endeavor, drawing from the National Center for Education Statistics and the captivating expanse of YouTube, to uncover the esoteric connection between the number of associate degrees awarded in gender studies and the total length of The Game Theorists' YouTube videos.

To begin this humorous but meticulous journey, we compiled a comprehensive dataset spanning the years 2011 to 2021, ensuring a substantial temporal scope to capture the ever-evolving landscape of educational achievements and online video content. The amalgamation of data from these distinct sources serves as a testament to the synergistic melding of seemingly disparate realms, embodying the spirit of our investigation.

The quest for the correlation between these two variables required a delicate balance of statistical prowess and jovial curiosity. We harnessed the power of correlation coefficients to discern the strength and direction of the relationship, deploying computational tools that deftly navigate the whims of statistical analysis. Through this scholarly soiree, we sought to unravel the enigmatic dance between the burgeoning cohort of gender studies graduates and the captivating expanse of game theory musings.

Furthermore, the statistical significance of the findings was ascertained through the application of hypothesis testing, evoking the spirit of a whimsical experiment within the captivating theater of academic inquiry. Our research team endeavored to guide this empirical expedition with a lighthearted yet methodically sound approach, acknowledging the undulating terrain of data analysis that parallels the unpredictability of comedic timing.

Finally, the synthesis of our methodology encapsulates the harmonious interplay between scholarly rigor and the playful spirit of exploration, mirroring the captivating convergence of gender studies and game theory content. Through this intricate yet jovial voyage, we endeavor to catalyze a mirthful melding of academic inquiry and the whimsical wonders of popular culture.

In summary, our methodology exemplifies the enchanting interweaving of scholarship and humor, evoking the spirit of academic investigation while embracing the exhilarating expanse of online entertainment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in gender studies and Total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube .

For the time period 2011 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9655825, r-squared of 0.9323496, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Gender Gap in Game Theory: Grasping the Grandiosity of Gender Studies Graduates' Gain on The Game Theorists

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the whimsical world of academia, exploring the unexpected connection between the number of associate degrees awarded in gender studies and the total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9655825 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021. The results are a testament to the synergistic interaction between seemingly disparate fields and highlight the manifold impacts of gender studies graduates on the enigmatic expanse of game theory content. This paper aims to provide a light-hearted yet thought-provoking perspective on the intersection of academia and popular culture, reminding us that even in the serious world of research, the game of humor and curiosity is always afoot.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the delightful realm of academia, where logic and laughter often collide, we find ourselves captivated by the incongruity of gender studies and the dimensions of The Game Theorists' YouTube oeuvre. The seemingly whimsical yet surprisingly compelling association between the number of associate degrees awarded in gender studies and the total length of The Game Theorists' YouTube videos has piqued our scholarly curiosity.
While some might assume this connection to be as elusive as the quest for the perfect pun, our investigation has unearthed a remarkably strong correlation between these two variables. Indeed, the statistical results have defied expectations, prompting us to embrace the delightful dance of data analysis and the whimsical waltz of YouTube content.
As we embark on this academic escapade, our goal is to offer a lighthearted yet empirically grounded exploration of this serendipitous synergy. Through the lens of statistical analysis and the camaraderie of comedic observation, we aim to shed light on the captivating interplay between gender studies graduates and the engrossing domain of game theory content. After all, in the grand symphony of academia, it is not uncommon for the most unexpected duets to create unforgettable melodies of insight and amusement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The examination of the relationship between the number of associate degrees awarded in gender studies and the total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos yielded a surprising and positively uproarious correlation coefficient of 0.9655825, with an r-squared of 0.9323496. This quite impressive correlation coefficient indicates a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, akin to the unexpected resonance of a well-timed punchline.

Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 suggests that the likelihood of observing such a strong association between gender studies graduates and The Game Theorists' content length by mere chance is as improbable as stumbling upon a statistical unicorn in the realm of academia.

Fig. 1 provides a visual depiction of the jocularly robust correlation between the number of associate degrees in gender studies and the length of videos produced by The Game Theorists. The scatterplot not only conveys the highly significant relationship but also showcases the harmonious synchrony between the scholarly pursuits of gender studies and the engaging expanse of game theory discourse.

In summary, our findings illuminate the unexpected interplay between the academic realm of gender studies and the captivating content of The Game Theorists, demonstrating that even in the serious pursuit of elucidating statistical relationships, humor and surprise often reign supreme.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in gender studies and Total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Gender Gap in Game Theory: Grasping the Grandiosity of Gender Studies Graduates' Gain on The Game Theorists

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the whimsical world of academia, exploring the unexpected connection between the number of associate degrees awarded in gender studies and the total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9655825 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021. The results are a testament to the synergistic interaction between seemingly disparate fields and highlight the manifold impacts of gender studies graduates on the enigmatic expanse of game theory content. This paper aims to provide a light-hearted yet thought-provoking perspective on the intersection of academia and popular culture, reminding us that even in the serious world of research, the game of humor and curiosity is always afoot.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith (2015) examines the correlation between the number of associate degrees awarded in gender studies and the length of The Game Theorists' YouTube videos and finds a surprisingly strong positive relationship. Similarly, Doe (2017) underscores the impact of gender studies graduates on the landscape of online content creation, highlighting the profound influence of their perspectives on game theory-themed videos. Jones (2019) further elaborates on the intersection of gender studies and digital media, elucidating the intricate dynamics that underpin the captivating connection between academic pursuits and popular culture.
In "The Gendered Game: Exploring Identity and Power in Digital Spaces," the authors delve into the role of gender in shaping online gaming experiences, providing a comprehensive examination of the societal implications of gender representation in digital realms. Meanwhile, "Game Theory and Gender: Exploring Diverse Perspectives" offers a compelling analysis of the ways in which gender studies principles intersect with the intricate frameworks of game theory, showcasing the breadth of influence that gender-focused academic disciplines can have on digital content creation.
Turning to fictional works that might offer tangential insights, "The Gender Paradox: A Tale of Daring Discovery" and "The Game Theorist's Dilemma: An Enigmatic Exploration" present whimsical narratives that touch upon the confluence of gender studies and game theory, intertwining elements of mystery and humor to create an engaging backdrop for scholarly inquiry. Furthermore, movies such as "Game Theory: The Gender Chronicles" and "Gender Studies in the Game of Theorists" provide an entertaining yet thought-provoking glimpse into the realms of academic pursuits and online content creation, offering inspiration for the playful yet insightful exploration of our research topic.

[[RESULTS]]
The examination of the relationship between the number of associate degrees awarded in gender studies and the total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos yielded a surprising and positively uproarious correlation coefficient of 0.9655825, with an r-squared of 0.9323496. This quite impressive correlation coefficient indicates a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, akin to the unexpected resonance of a well-timed punchline.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 suggests that the likelihood of observing such a strong association between gender studies graduates and The Game Theorists' content length by mere chance is as improbable as stumbling upon a statistical unicorn in the realm of academia.
Fig. 1 provides a visual depiction of the jocularly robust correlation between the number of associate degrees in gender studies and the length of videos produced by The Game Theorists. The scatterplot not only conveys the highly significant relationship but also showcases the harmonious synchrony between the scholarly pursuits of gender studies and the engaging expanse of game theory discourse.
In summary, our findings illuminate the unexpected interplay between the academic realm of gender studies and the captivating content of The Game Theorists, demonstrating that even in the serious pursuit of elucidating statistical relationships, humor and surprise often reign supreme.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study contribute to a deeper understanding of the whimsical interplay between the world of academia and the digital realm of game theory content. The results corroborate prior research by Smith (2015), Doe (2017), and Jones (2019) who hinted at the profound influence of gender studies graduates on the captivating enigma of The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. It appears that the scholarly pursuits of gender studies imbue the content with a certain je ne sais quoi, much like the unexpected twist in a good joke.

The high correlation coefficient of 0.9655825, with an r-squared of 0.9323496, between the number of associate degrees awarded in gender studies and the total length of The Game Theorists videos underscores the remarkably strong and captivating relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if gender studies graduates and game theory content creators are engaged in a cosmic dance, where each step is a statistical footnote and every twirl a data point.

The p-value of less than 0.01 suggests that the likelihood of such a strong association occurring by random chance is as unlikely as finding a unicorn grazing in the quad. This level of statistical significance further accentuates the seemingly playful, yet inherently thought-provoking, bond between the academic pursuits of gender studies and the exuberant expanse of game theory discourse.

The scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 not only portrays the statistically robust relationship but also subtly hints at the dance of academic inquiry and digital content creation. One can almost imagine the data points pirouetting across the graph, symbolizing the intertwined path of gender studies and game theory, like two partners in a lighthearted yet profound statistical waltz.

In conclusion, this study sheds light on the unexpectedly harmonious interaction between the serious scholarly pursuit of gender studies and the engaging expanse of The Game Theorists' content. The results warrant further exploration of the nuanced dynamics at play, encouraging researchers to don their statistical dancing shoes and waltz into the playful yet insightful world of interdisciplinary inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in gender studies and Total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Gender Gap in Game Theory: Grasping the Grandiosity of Gender Studies Graduates' Gain on The Game Theorists

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the whimsical world of academia, exploring the unexpected connection between the number of associate degrees awarded in gender studies and the total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9655825 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021. The results are a testament to the synergistic interaction between seemingly disparate fields and highlight the manifold impacts of gender studies graduates on the enigmatic expanse of game theory content. This paper aims to provide a light-hearted yet thought-provoking perspective on the intersection of academia and popular culture, reminding us that even in the serious world of research, the game of humor and curiosity is always afoot.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the delightful realm of academia, where logic and laughter often collide, we find ourselves captivated by the incongruity of gender studies and the dimensions of The Game Theorists' YouTube oeuvre. The seemingly whimsical yet surprisingly compelling association between the number of associate degrees awarded in gender studies and the total length of The Game Theorists' YouTube videos has piqued our scholarly curiosity.
While some might assume this connection to be as elusive as the quest for the perfect pun, our investigation has unearthed a remarkably strong correlation between these two variables. Indeed, the statistical results have defied expectations, prompting us to embrace the delightful dance of data analysis and the whimsical waltz of YouTube content.
As we embark on this academic escapade, our goal is to offer a lighthearted yet empirically grounded exploration of this serendipitous synergy. Through the lens of statistical analysis and the camaraderie of comedic observation, we aim to shed light on the captivating interplay between gender studies graduates and the engrossing domain of game theory content. After all, in the grand symphony of academia, it is not uncommon for the most unexpected duets to create unforgettable melodies of insight and amusement.

[[RESULTS]]
The examination of the relationship between the number of associate degrees awarded in gender studies and the total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos yielded a surprising and positively uproarious correlation coefficient of 0.9655825, with an r-squared of 0.9323496. This quite impressive correlation coefficient indicates a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, akin to the unexpected resonance of a well-timed punchline.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 suggests that the likelihood of observing such a strong association between gender studies graduates and The Game Theorists' content length by mere chance is as improbable as stumbling upon a statistical unicorn in the realm of academia.
Fig. 1 provides a visual depiction of the jocularly robust correlation between the number of associate degrees in gender studies and the length of videos produced by The Game Theorists. The scatterplot not only conveys the highly significant relationship but also showcases the harmonious synchrony between the scholarly pursuits of gender studies and the engaging expanse of game theory discourse.
In summary, our findings illuminate the unexpected interplay between the academic realm of gender studies and the captivating content of The Game Theorists, demonstrating that even in the serious pursuit of elucidating statistical relationships, humor and surprise often reign supreme.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has brought to light the delightfully surprising correlation between the number of associate degrees awarded in gender studies and the total length of The Game Theorists' YouTube videos. Much like the unexpected punchline of a clever joke, the correlation coefficient of 0.9655825 and an r-squared of 0.9323496 reveal a connection so strong, it's as if these variables have been engaged in a statistical stand-up routine.

This investigation has not only underscored the remarkable synergy between the world of academia and the realm of popular culture but also highlighted the profound impact of gender studies graduates on the enigmatic expanse of game theory content. It's as though these graduates are weaving their gender studies expertise into the intricate tapestry of game theory, creating a statistical sitcom of enthralling proportions.

The visual representation in Fig. 1 not only conveys this unexpectedly robust correlation but also serves as a visual gag, reminding us that in the waltz of statistical analysis, there's always room for a comedic twist.

It is abundantly clear from our findings that the influence of gender studies graduates on The Game Theorists' content length is no statistical fluke. The likelihood of observing such a strong association by chance is as rare as finding a statistical unicorn grazing in the fields of academia.

In light of these uproarious findings and whimsically robust correlations, it is evident that no further research in this area is needed. The synergistic interplay between gender studies graduates and The Game Theorists' content has unfolded before our eyes, delivering a statistical punchline that leaves us with the resounding conclusion: "The research laughs, and the correlations endure."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Gender Gap in Game Theory: Grasping the Grandiosity of Gender Studies Graduates' Gain on The Game Theorists. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Playful Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Gender Gap in Game Theory: Grasping the Grandiosity of Gender Studies Graduates' Gain on The Game Theorists. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Interdisciplinary Gender Studies and Strategic Game Theory Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Gender Gap in Game Theory: Grasping the Grandiosity of Gender Studies Graduates' Gain on The Game Theorists with an abstract of This study delves into the whimsical world of academia, exploring the unexpected connection between the number of associate degrees awarded in gender studies and the total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9655825 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021. The results are a testament to the synergistic interaction between seemingly disparate fields and highlight the manifold impacts of gender studies graduates on the enigmatic expanse of game theory content. This paper aims to provide a light-hearted yet thought-provoking perspective on the intersection of academia and popular culture, reminding us that even in the serious world of research, the game of humor and curiosity is always afoot.

ChatGPT:

gender studies, game theory, gender studies graduates, YouTube videos, National Center for Education Statistics, correlation coefficient, academia, popular culture, academic research, gender gap, associate degrees, gender studies impact

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Associates degrees awarded in gender studies
Detailed data title: Associate's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions with a field of study of Area, ethnic, cultural, gender, and group studies
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Associates degrees awarded in gender studies

Total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9655825 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9323496 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Associates degrees awarded in gender studies) over the 11 years from 2011 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.5E-6. 0.0000014500374797765640000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.00015% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 689,637 random variables You don't actually need 689 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.87, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Associates degrees awarded in gender studies (Degrees awarded)209194271363382419420559713673936
Total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos (Total length in seconds)12891120841926022855444704786246666530899992094280108066




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([209,194,271,363,382,419,420,559,713,673,936,])
array_2 = np.array([12891,12084,19260,22855,44470,47862,46666,53089,99920,94280,108066,])
array_1_name = "Associates degrees awarded in gender studies"
array_2_name = "Total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 4593 · Black Variable ID: 1210 · Red Variable ID: 25736
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0