Report an error
Total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Associates degrees awarded in gender studies | r=0.97 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Natural cheese consumption | r=0.94 | 13yrs | No |
The number of chemical technicians in Kentucky | r=0.9 | 14yrs | No |
Google searches for 'humble pi' | r=0.86 | 15yrs | No |
The number of private detectives in Louisiana | r=0.8 | 14yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'florida man' meme | r=0.67 | 15yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and Jupiter | r=-0.94 | 15yrs | No |
Total length of The Game Theorists YouTube videos also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)