about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,589 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Vermont and the second variable is Gasoline pumped in Cayman Islands.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more Vermont residents showed their support for the Democratic candidate, the overall political atmosphere became charged. This led to an increase in positive energy, which, as we all know, is directly linked to the concept of potential energy in the field of physics. This increase in potential energy created a ripple effect, influencing the molecules in the gasoline pumped in the Cayman Islands, causing them to move at a slightly faster rate and thus increasing the overall volume of gasoline pumped. It's like the gasoline couldn't help but get a little bit more fired up itself!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a gas station scene in the Cayman Islands, capturing the bustling activity with the focus on the gasoline pump. Show the fuel pump extending from the island's characteristic white and turquoise building, with vibrant colors and a sense of liveliness. The atmosphere should convey an energetic and charged mood, as if the gasoline itself is responding to the positive vibes from the political events in Vermont. The image should reflect a photorealistic portrayal of the scene, highlighting the increased volume of gasoline being pumped as if it's infused with the same energy and excitement. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Vermont and Gasoline pumped in Cayman Islands. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Pop art Charcoal A photo-realistic image 3D Pixar Style Scalar art
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Vermont and Gasoline pumped in Cayman Islands, in the following situation: As more Vermont residents showed their support for the Democratic candidate, the overall political atmosphere became charged. This led to an increase in positive energy, which, as we all know, is directly linked to the concept of potential energy in the field of physics. This increase in potential energy created a ripple effect, influencing the molecules in the gasoline pumped in the Cayman Islands, causing them to move at a slightly faster rate and thus increasing the overall volume of gasoline pumped. It's like the gasoline couldn't help but get a little bit more fired up itself!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Vermont, as more residents cast their votes for the Democratic presidential candidate, the political atmosphere charged up with energy. The positive vibes created a ripple effect, energizing the molecules in the gasoline being pumped in the Cayman Islands. The gasoline seemed to pick up its pace, increasing the overall volume pumped as if it couldn't help but get a little fired up itself!

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In Vermont, as more residents cast their votes for the Democratic presidential candidate, the political atmosphere charged up with energy. The positive vibes created a ripple effect, energizing the molecules in the gasoline being pumped in the Cayman Islands. The gasoline seemed to pick up its pace, increasing the overall volume pumped as if it couldn't help but get a little fired up itself! Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a gas station scene in the Cayman Islands, capturing the bustling activity with the focus on the gasoline pump. Show the fuel pump extending from the island's characteristic white and turquoise building, with vibrant colors and a sense of liveliness. The atmosphere should convey an energetic and charged mood, as if the gasoline itself is responding to the positive vibes from the political events in Vermont. The image should reflect a photorealistic portrayal of the scene, highlighting the increased volume of gasoline being pumped as if it's infused with the same energy and excitement.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Vermont caused Gasoline pumped in Cayman Islands to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Fueling the Vote: An Unlikely Alliance Between Electoral Preferences and Petroleum Pumping Patterns

International Journal of Petroleum Politics and Public Opinion

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Vermont and Gasoline pumped in Cayman Islands. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9757193 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Vote: An Unlikely Alliance Between Electoral Preferences and Petroleum Pumping Patterns"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the perplexing relationship between electoral behavior in Vermont and the consumption of gasoline in the Cayman Islands. Analyzing comprehensive data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team applied rigorous statistical methods to scrutinize this seemingly incongruous linkage. Surprisingly, a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9757193 with a p-value less than 0.01 emerged for the period spanning from 1980 to 2020, indicating a strong association between votes cast for the Democratic presidential candidate in Vermont and the volume of gasoline dispensed in the Cayman Islands. The implications of these findings elicit a range of questions, prompting us to explore the intricate dynamics underlying this unexpected relationship. Thus, this paper not only sheds light on an unprecedented convergence but also serves as a testament to the capricious nature of electoral choices and the enigmatic forces that govern them.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Vermont and Gasoline pumped in Cayman Islands. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Vote: An Unlikely Alliance Between Electoral Preferences and Petroleum Pumping Patterns"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the perplexing relationship between electoral behavior in Vermont and the consumption of gasoline in the Cayman Islands. Analyzing comprehensive data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team applied rigorous statistical methods to scrutinize this seemingly incongruous linkage. Surprisingly, a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9757193 with a p-value less than 0.01 emerged for the period spanning from 1980 to 2020, indicating a strong association between votes cast for the Democratic presidential candidate in Vermont and the volume of gasoline dispensed in the Cayman Islands. The implications of these findings elicit a range of questions, prompting us to explore the intricate dynamics underlying this unexpected relationship. Thus, this paper not only sheds light on an unprecedented convergence but also serves as a testament to the capricious nature of electoral choices and the enigmatic forces that govern them.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The enigmatic nature of electoral choices is a topic that has intrigued scholars for centuries. The intricate dance of political preferences, often swaying like a pendulum, has long been a subject of fascination and bewilderment. Similarly, the labyrinthine patterns of petroleum consumption, intertwined with economic, geopolitical, and environmental threads, have captivated the minds of researchers and policymakers alike. However, who would have thought that these two seemingly disparate domains – the ballot box in Vermont and the gas pumps in the Cayman Islands – would find themselves inexplicably entangled in a statistical pas de deux?

As researchers delving into this conundrum, we set out to explore the relationship between the votes cast for the Democratic presidential candidate in Vermont and the volume of gasoline dispensed in the Cayman Islands. Initially, this undertaking may seem as unlikely an alliance as an economist at a poetry slam or a statistician stepping onto the dance floor. However, armed with an arsenal of data from reputable sources and fortified by the stalwart guardians of statistical analysis, we embarked on this peculiar journey with a twinkle of curiosity and a healthy dose of skepticism.

In this paper, we traverse the uncharted terrain of electoral whimsy and petroleum proclivities with the precision of a mathematician and the curiosity of an intrepid explorer. We present the unearthed treasure of a correlation coefficient that surpasses the expectations of even the most audacious researcher, suggesting a synchronicity that rivals that of a perfectly choreographed ballet. Indeed, the statistical bond revealed between the two variables could make even the most fervent disbeliever lift an eyebrow, akin to a seasoned detective stumbling upon an unexpected clue.

As we unravel this unlikely correlation, we invite our esteemed readers to partake in this intellectual expedition, where the ordinary meets the extraordinary, and the mundane transforms into the mysterious. Join us as we navigate the uncharted territories of statistical shenanigans and unearths the unexpected connections between democracy and diesel, votes and gasoline, and the quotidian and the quixotic.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Vermont and Gasoline pumped in Cayman Islands. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Vote: An Unlikely Alliance Between Electoral Preferences and Petroleum Pumping Patterns"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the perplexing relationship between electoral behavior in Vermont and the consumption of gasoline in the Cayman Islands. Analyzing comprehensive data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team applied rigorous statistical methods to scrutinize this seemingly incongruous linkage. Surprisingly, a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9757193 with a p-value less than 0.01 emerged for the period spanning from 1980 to 2020, indicating a strong association between votes cast for the Democratic presidential candidate in Vermont and the volume of gasoline dispensed in the Cayman Islands. The implications of these findings elicit a range of questions, prompting us to explore the intricate dynamics underlying this unexpected relationship. Thus, this paper not only sheds light on an unprecedented convergence but also serves as a testament to the capricious nature of electoral choices and the enigmatic forces that govern them.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enigmatic nature of electoral choices is a topic that has intrigued scholars for centuries. The intricate dance of political preferences, often swaying like a pendulum, has long been a subject of fascination and bewilderment. Similarly, the labyrinthine patterns of petroleum consumption, intertwined with economic, geopolitical, and environmental threads, have captivated the minds of researchers and policymakers alike. However, who would have thought that these two seemingly disparate domains – the ballot box in Vermont and the gas pumps in the Cayman Islands – would find themselves inexplicably entangled in a statistical pas de deux?
As researchers delving into this conundrum, we set out to explore the relationship between the votes cast for the Democratic presidential candidate in Vermont and the volume of gasoline dispensed in the Cayman Islands. Initially, this undertaking may seem as unlikely an alliance as an economist at a poetry slam or a statistician stepping onto the dance floor. However, armed with an arsenal of data from reputable sources and fortified by the stalwart guardians of statistical analysis, we embarked on this peculiar journey with a twinkle of curiosity and a healthy dose of skepticism.
In this paper, we traverse the uncharted terrain of electoral whimsy and petroleum proclivities with the precision of a mathematician and the curiosity of an intrepid explorer. We present the unearthed treasure of a correlation coefficient that surpasses the expectations of even the most audacious researcher, suggesting a synchronicity that rivals that of a perfectly choreographed ballet. Indeed, the statistical bond revealed between the two variables could make even the most fervent disbeliever lift an eyebrow, akin to a seasoned detective stumbling upon an unexpected clue.
As we unravel this unlikely correlation, we invite our esteemed readers to partake in this intellectual expedition, where the ordinary meets the extraordinary, and the mundane transforms into the mysterious. Join us as we navigate the uncharted territories of statistical shenanigans and unearths the unexpected connections between democracy and diesel, votes and gasoline, and the quotidian and the quixotic.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In the pursuit of comprehending the bewildering nexus between votes cast for the Democratic presidential candidate in Vermont and the volume of gasoline dispensed in the Cayman Islands, past studies have shed limited light on this unlikely association. Smith et al. (2010) painstakingly explored the electoral proclivities of Vermont, yet hardly touched upon the transoceanic ramifications echoing from the fuel pumps in the Caribbean. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) meticulously dissected the patterns of gasoline consumption in the Cayman Islands, but their focus remained oblivious to the electoral predilections germinating in the heart of the Green Mountain State.

Turning to more tangentially related sources, "The Tyranny of Oil" by Smith (2008) offers a captivating insight into the global grip of the petroleum industry, yet fails to navigate the peculiar bond between political leanings and pump nozzles. On the fictional front, "The Diesel That Divided Us" by Diesel (2017) presents a riveting tale of electoral intrigue in a fictional Vermont, but alas, does not extend its narrative to the Caribbean havens of gasoline. Furthermore, board games like "Pipeline Politics" and "Election Emissions" provide a whimsical perspective on the interaction between energy and elections, albeit in a rather lighthearted and figurative sense.

Thus, the authors find themselves navigating uncharted territories in this domain, akin to a lost traveler stumbling upon a whimsical wonderland. As they embark on this intellectual journey, armed with data and unyielding curiosity, they aim to unravel the mystery underlying this perplexing correlation, where the ordinary metamorphoses into the extraordinary, and statistical analysis becomes a peculiar form of entertainment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Vermont and Gasoline pumped in Cayman Islands. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Vote: An Unlikely Alliance Between Electoral Preferences and Petroleum Pumping Patterns"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the perplexing relationship between electoral behavior in Vermont and the consumption of gasoline in the Cayman Islands. Analyzing comprehensive data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team applied rigorous statistical methods to scrutinize this seemingly incongruous linkage. Surprisingly, a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9757193 with a p-value less than 0.01 emerged for the period spanning from 1980 to 2020, indicating a strong association between votes cast for the Democratic presidential candidate in Vermont and the volume of gasoline dispensed in the Cayman Islands. The implications of these findings elicit a range of questions, prompting us to explore the intricate dynamics underlying this unexpected relationship. Thus, this paper not only sheds light on an unprecedented convergence but also serves as a testament to the capricious nature of electoral choices and the enigmatic forces that govern them.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enigmatic nature of electoral choices is a topic that has intrigued scholars for centuries. The intricate dance of political preferences, often swaying like a pendulum, has long been a subject of fascination and bewilderment. Similarly, the labyrinthine patterns of petroleum consumption, intertwined with economic, geopolitical, and environmental threads, have captivated the minds of researchers and policymakers alike. However, who would have thought that these two seemingly disparate domains – the ballot box in Vermont and the gas pumps in the Cayman Islands – would find themselves inexplicably entangled in a statistical pas de deux?
As researchers delving into this conundrum, we set out to explore the relationship between the votes cast for the Democratic presidential candidate in Vermont and the volume of gasoline dispensed in the Cayman Islands. Initially, this undertaking may seem as unlikely an alliance as an economist at a poetry slam or a statistician stepping onto the dance floor. However, armed with an arsenal of data from reputable sources and fortified by the stalwart guardians of statistical analysis, we embarked on this peculiar journey with a twinkle of curiosity and a healthy dose of skepticism.
In this paper, we traverse the uncharted terrain of electoral whimsy and petroleum proclivities with the precision of a mathematician and the curiosity of an intrepid explorer. We present the unearthed treasure of a correlation coefficient that surpasses the expectations of even the most audacious researcher, suggesting a synchronicity that rivals that of a perfectly choreographed ballet. Indeed, the statistical bond revealed between the two variables could make even the most fervent disbeliever lift an eyebrow, akin to a seasoned detective stumbling upon an unexpected clue.
As we unravel this unlikely correlation, we invite our esteemed readers to partake in this intellectual expedition, where the ordinary meets the extraordinary, and the mundane transforms into the mysterious. Join us as we navigate the uncharted territories of statistical shenanigans and unearths the unexpected connections between democracy and diesel, votes and gasoline, and the quotidian and the quixotic.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In seeking to untangle the web of complexity surrounding the relationship between the votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in Vermont and the volume of gasoline dispensed in the Cayman Islands, our research team employed a multifaceted approach. First and foremost, data pertaining to electoral outcomes in Vermont, as well as gasoline consumption in the Cayman Islands, were meticulously extracted from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration. The use of these reputable sources ensured that the information analyzed was akin to a fine, aged wine - robust, nuanced, and capable of leaving a lasting impression.

To interrogate the potential interaction between voting behavior and gasoline consumption, a series of statistical analyses were carried out with the finesse and precision of a chef crafting a Michelin-star meal. The collected data, spanning from 1980 to 2020, was subjected to a correlation analysis, utilizing the Pearson correlation coefficient to gauge the strength and direction of the relationship between the seemingly incongruous variables. This process unfolded with the delicacy of a tightrope walker, aiming to maintain balance and minimize the chances of stumbling into spurious correlations or statistical acrobatics.

Furthermore, to account for potential confounding variables and the intricate interplay of historical events, a multivariate regression analysis was performed. This modeling approach allowed for the identification of potential lurking variables that might whisper misleading tales of association between Vermont's political predilections and the distant sound of gasoline pumps churning in the Cayman Islands. The use of this method was akin to wielding a map and compass in uncharted territory, carefully plotting the course amidst a sea of potential statistical pitfalls.

Not content to rest on conventional analytical laurels, the research team also delved into time series analysis to unravel any temporal trends or cyclical patterns that may underpin the relationship between electoral preferences and petroleum dispensation. This methodological choice was made with the same spirit of intrepid curiosity that drives archaeologists to unearth ancient artifacts or astronomers to probe the mysteries of the cosmos, eager to uncover hidden truths within the folds of time.

In sum, the methodology adopted for this study reflects a conscientious and thorough approach, characterized by the careful curation of data and the application of analytical techniques that rival the precision of a master craftsman sculpting an intricate objet d'art. This methodological journey, as we shall elucidate in subsequent sections, paved the way for the unveiling of an unexpected and thought-provoking nexus between the ballot box and the fuel pump.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Vermont and Gasoline pumped in Cayman Islands. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1980 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9757193, r-squared of 0.9520282, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Vote: An Unlikely Alliance Between Electoral Preferences and Petroleum Pumping Patterns"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the perplexing relationship between electoral behavior in Vermont and the consumption of gasoline in the Cayman Islands. Analyzing comprehensive data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team applied rigorous statistical methods to scrutinize this seemingly incongruous linkage. Surprisingly, a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9757193 with a p-value less than 0.01 emerged for the period spanning from 1980 to 2020, indicating a strong association between votes cast for the Democratic presidential candidate in Vermont and the volume of gasoline dispensed in the Cayman Islands. The implications of these findings elicit a range of questions, prompting us to explore the intricate dynamics underlying this unexpected relationship. Thus, this paper not only sheds light on an unprecedented convergence but also serves as a testament to the capricious nature of electoral choices and the enigmatic forces that govern them.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The enigmatic nature of electoral choices is a topic that has intrigued scholars for centuries. The intricate dance of political preferences, often swaying like a pendulum, has long been a subject of fascination and bewilderment. Similarly, the labyrinthine patterns of petroleum consumption, intertwined with economic, geopolitical, and environmental threads, have captivated the minds of researchers and policymakers alike. However, who would have thought that these two seemingly disparate domains – the ballot box in Vermont and the gas pumps in the Cayman Islands – would find themselves inexplicably entangled in a statistical pas de deux?
As researchers delving into this conundrum, we set out to explore the relationship between the votes cast for the Democratic presidential candidate in Vermont and the volume of gasoline dispensed in the Cayman Islands. Initially, this undertaking may seem as unlikely an alliance as an economist at a poetry slam or a statistician stepping onto the dance floor. However, armed with an arsenal of data from reputable sources and fortified by the stalwart guardians of statistical analysis, we embarked on this peculiar journey with a twinkle of curiosity and a healthy dose of skepticism.
In this paper, we traverse the uncharted terrain of electoral whimsy and petroleum proclivities with the precision of a mathematician and the curiosity of an intrepid explorer. We present the unearthed treasure of a correlation coefficient that surpasses the expectations of even the most audacious researcher, suggesting a synchronicity that rivals that of a perfectly choreographed ballet. Indeed, the statistical bond revealed between the two variables could make even the most fervent disbeliever lift an eyebrow, akin to a seasoned detective stumbling upon an unexpected clue.
As we unravel this unlikely correlation, we invite our esteemed readers to partake in this intellectual expedition, where the ordinary meets the extraordinary, and the mundane transforms into the mysterious. Join us as we navigate the uncharted territories of statistical shenanigans and unearths the unexpected connections between democracy and diesel, votes and gasoline, and the quotidian and the quixotic.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The correlation coefficient of 0.9757193, r-squared value of 0.9520282, and a significance level of p < 0.01, all point to a remarkably robust association between votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in Vermont and the quantity of gasoline pumped in the Cayman Islands. This correlation is stronger than the magnetic force between a pair of well-aligned poles, defying conventional expectations with a flair that would leave even the most seasoned statistician raising an eyebrow.

The scatterplot presented in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates this unexpected relationship, resembling a pas de deux between two variables that, at first glance, seem to have little reason to be dancing together. The plot reveals a near-linear pattern, indicating that as the votes for the Democratic candidate in Vermont rise and fall, so too does the volume of gasoline dispensed in the Cayman Islands. This synchronous rhythm between an act of democratic participation and the fuel that drives economies is as perplexing as it is fascinating.

These findings challenge traditional perceptions of the determinants of gasoline consumption, as well as the conventional understanding of electoral behavior. The dance of democracy and the flow of fuel in the Cayman Islands seem to be choreographed by an invisible hand that eludes easy understanding.

In essence, these results not only underscore the capricious nature of human choices, but also hint at the clandestine interplay of variables that influence global patterns. It is as if this unforeseen correlation were an enigmatic riddle, daring scholars to unravel its intricacies and interrogate the world of statistical oddities with a mix of awe and amusement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Vermont and Gasoline pumped in Cayman Islands. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Vote: An Unlikely Alliance Between Electoral Preferences and Petroleum Pumping Patterns"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the perplexing relationship between electoral behavior in Vermont and the consumption of gasoline in the Cayman Islands. Analyzing comprehensive data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team applied rigorous statistical methods to scrutinize this seemingly incongruous linkage. Surprisingly, a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9757193 with a p-value less than 0.01 emerged for the period spanning from 1980 to 2020, indicating a strong association between votes cast for the Democratic presidential candidate in Vermont and the volume of gasoline dispensed in the Cayman Islands. The implications of these findings elicit a range of questions, prompting us to explore the intricate dynamics underlying this unexpected relationship. Thus, this paper not only sheds light on an unprecedented convergence but also serves as a testament to the capricious nature of electoral choices and the enigmatic forces that govern them.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the pursuit of comprehending the bewildering nexus between votes cast for the Democratic presidential candidate in Vermont and the volume of gasoline dispensed in the Cayman Islands, past studies have shed limited light on this unlikely association. Smith et al. (2010) painstakingly explored the electoral proclivities of Vermont, yet hardly touched upon the transoceanic ramifications echoing from the fuel pumps in the Caribbean. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) meticulously dissected the patterns of gasoline consumption in the Cayman Islands, but their focus remained oblivious to the electoral predilections germinating in the heart of the Green Mountain State.
Turning to more tangentially related sources, "The Tyranny of Oil" by Smith (2008) offers a captivating insight into the global grip of the petroleum industry, yet fails to navigate the peculiar bond between political leanings and pump nozzles. On the fictional front, "The Diesel That Divided Us" by Diesel (2017) presents a riveting tale of electoral intrigue in a fictional Vermont, but alas, does not extend its narrative to the Caribbean havens of gasoline. Furthermore, board games like "Pipeline Politics" and "Election Emissions" provide a whimsical perspective on the interaction between energy and elections, albeit in a rather lighthearted and figurative sense.
Thus, the authors find themselves navigating uncharted territories in this domain, akin to a lost traveler stumbling upon a whimsical wonderland. As they embark on this intellectual journey, armed with data and unyielding curiosity, they aim to unravel the mystery underlying this perplexing correlation, where the ordinary metamorphoses into the extraordinary, and statistical analysis becomes a peculiar form of entertainment.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation coefficient of 0.9757193, r-squared value of 0.9520282, and a significance level of p < 0.01, all point to a remarkably robust association between votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in Vermont and the quantity of gasoline pumped in the Cayman Islands. This correlation is stronger than the magnetic force between a pair of well-aligned poles, defying conventional expectations with a flair that would leave even the most seasoned statistician raising an eyebrow.
The scatterplot presented in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates this unexpected relationship, resembling a pas de deux between two variables that, at first glance, seem to have little reason to be dancing together. The plot reveals a near-linear pattern, indicating that as the votes for the Democratic candidate in Vermont rise and fall, so too does the volume of gasoline dispensed in the Cayman Islands. This synchronous rhythm between an act of democratic participation and the fuel that drives economies is as perplexing as it is fascinating.
These findings challenge traditional perceptions of the determinants of gasoline consumption, as well as the conventional understanding of electoral behavior. The dance of democracy and the flow of fuel in the Cayman Islands seem to be choreographed by an invisible hand that eludes easy understanding.
In essence, these results not only underscore the capricious nature of human choices, but also hint at the clandestine interplay of variables that influence global patterns. It is as if this unforeseen correlation were an enigmatic riddle, daring scholars to unravel its intricacies and interrogate the world of statistical oddities with a mix of awe and amusement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this study have illuminated a startling connection between the electoral preferences in Vermont and the gasoline consumption in the Cayman Islands. The robust correlation coefficient and significance level indicate an unusually strong association, enough to make even the most ardent skepticism waver like a leaf in the statistical wind. These findings underscore the intricate interplay between seemingly unrelated variables, prompting a reevaluation of our perceptions of causality and correlation. It is as if our statistical analysis has turned into a peculiar performance that defies traditional expectations, leaving us to marvel at the whimsical nature of empirical inquiry.

Harkening back to the whimsical literature review, it appears that our findings have lent considerable empirical support to the tangentially related sources. The work of Smith et al. (2010) and Doe and Jones (2015), though not explicitly focused on this peculiar linkage, now finds a curious echo in our results. It seems that our academic pursuit has transformed into an unexpected journey through uncharted territories, akin to a whimsical wonderland in the realm of statistical exploration. The dance of democratic votes and gasoline flow has now become the centerpiece of this intellectual tableau, capturing the imagination and teasing the intellect with its enigmatic allure.

As we reflect on the unexpected juxtaposition of electoral choices and petroleum pumping, we are compelled to revisit the fundamental tenets of statistical analysis. The near-linear pattern revealed in the scatterplot seems to mock our conventional understanding of correlation, as if to jest at the established norms of empirical inquiry. It is as if statistics itself has taken on a whimsical character, playing a rather cheeky game with our expectations and assumptions.

In essence, these results not only challenge the traditional boundaries of empirical research, but also beckon us to reconsider the very essence of statistical oddities. The dance of democracy and gasoline in the Cayman Islands stands as a testament to the delightful unpredictability of empirical inquiry, urging us to interrogate the whims and caprices of the statistical world with a mixture of bemusement and scholarly rigor. The enigmatic forces governing this remarkable correlation demand nothing less than an intellectual tango, where the steps are unpredictable, the music is beguiling, and the audience is left wondering at the peculiarities of statistical theatrics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Vermont and Gasoline pumped in Cayman Islands. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Vote: An Unlikely Alliance Between Electoral Preferences and Petroleum Pumping Patterns"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the perplexing relationship between electoral behavior in Vermont and the consumption of gasoline in the Cayman Islands. Analyzing comprehensive data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team applied rigorous statistical methods to scrutinize this seemingly incongruous linkage. Surprisingly, a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9757193 with a p-value less than 0.01 emerged for the period spanning from 1980 to 2020, indicating a strong association between votes cast for the Democratic presidential candidate in Vermont and the volume of gasoline dispensed in the Cayman Islands. The implications of these findings elicit a range of questions, prompting us to explore the intricate dynamics underlying this unexpected relationship. Thus, this paper not only sheds light on an unprecedented convergence but also serves as a testament to the capricious nature of electoral choices and the enigmatic forces that govern them.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The enigmatic nature of electoral choices is a topic that has intrigued scholars for centuries. The intricate dance of political preferences, often swaying like a pendulum, has long been a subject of fascination and bewilderment. Similarly, the labyrinthine patterns of petroleum consumption, intertwined with economic, geopolitical, and environmental threads, have captivated the minds of researchers and policymakers alike. However, who would have thought that these two seemingly disparate domains – the ballot box in Vermont and the gas pumps in the Cayman Islands – would find themselves inexplicably entangled in a statistical pas de deux?
As researchers delving into this conundrum, we set out to explore the relationship between the votes cast for the Democratic presidential candidate in Vermont and the volume of gasoline dispensed in the Cayman Islands. Initially, this undertaking may seem as unlikely an alliance as an economist at a poetry slam or a statistician stepping onto the dance floor. However, armed with an arsenal of data from reputable sources and fortified by the stalwart guardians of statistical analysis, we embarked on this peculiar journey with a twinkle of curiosity and a healthy dose of skepticism.
In this paper, we traverse the uncharted terrain of electoral whimsy and petroleum proclivities with the precision of a mathematician and the curiosity of an intrepid explorer. We present the unearthed treasure of a correlation coefficient that surpasses the expectations of even the most audacious researcher, suggesting a synchronicity that rivals that of a perfectly choreographed ballet. Indeed, the statistical bond revealed between the two variables could make even the most fervent disbeliever lift an eyebrow, akin to a seasoned detective stumbling upon an unexpected clue.
As we unravel this unlikely correlation, we invite our esteemed readers to partake in this intellectual expedition, where the ordinary meets the extraordinary, and the mundane transforms into the mysterious. Join us as we navigate the uncharted territories of statistical shenanigans and unearths the unexpected connections between democracy and diesel, votes and gasoline, and the quotidian and the quixotic.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation coefficient of 0.9757193, r-squared value of 0.9520282, and a significance level of p < 0.01, all point to a remarkably robust association between votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in Vermont and the quantity of gasoline pumped in the Cayman Islands. This correlation is stronger than the magnetic force between a pair of well-aligned poles, defying conventional expectations with a flair that would leave even the most seasoned statistician raising an eyebrow.
The scatterplot presented in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates this unexpected relationship, resembling a pas de deux between two variables that, at first glance, seem to have little reason to be dancing together. The plot reveals a near-linear pattern, indicating that as the votes for the Democratic candidate in Vermont rise and fall, so too does the volume of gasoline dispensed in the Cayman Islands. This synchronous rhythm between an act of democratic participation and the fuel that drives economies is as perplexing as it is fascinating.
These findings challenge traditional perceptions of the determinants of gasoline consumption, as well as the conventional understanding of electoral behavior. The dance of democracy and the flow of fuel in the Cayman Islands seem to be choreographed by an invisible hand that eludes easy understanding.
In essence, these results not only underscore the capricious nature of human choices, but also hint at the clandestine interplay of variables that influence global patterns. It is as if this unforeseen correlation were an enigmatic riddle, daring scholars to unravel its intricacies and interrogate the world of statistical oddities with a mix of awe and amusement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the unexpected and undeniably robust correlation between votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in Vermont and the volume of gasoline dispensed in the Cayman Islands unveils a statistical spectacle that is as enigmatic as it is entertaining. This inexplicable alliance between electoral preferences and petroleum pumping patterns tantalizes the intellect, leaving even the most seasoned researcher amused by the capricious nature of statistical relationships.

The findings of this study do not simply denote a connection between two seemingly unrelated variables; they beckon the onlooker to ponder the whimsicality of human behavior and the intricate dance of statistical phenomena. The linear relationship portrayed in the scatterplot resembling a well-synchronized dance between votes and gasoline consumption challenges conventional wisdom with a flair that would make even the most discerning observer raise an eyebrow.

This unprecedented convergence of electoral choices and fuel consumption not only showcases the unpredictability of human decisions but also testifies to the often-unseen forces that govern global patterns. Dare we say, it is as if the statistical gods themselves orchestrated this peculiar relationship, confounding researchers and jesting with the very fabric of statistical inquiry.

Therefore, in light of these findings, we assert that no further research in this area is warranted, as this peculiar correlation stands as a testament to the idiosyncratic nature of statistical relationships, beckoning researchers to embrace the absurdities of data with a mix of bemusement and scholarly rigidity. This statistical duet between votes and fuel consumption, much like a surrealist painting, invites scholars to marvel at the whimsy of statistical oddities and celebrate the elusiveness of the human mind.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fueling the Vote: An Unlikely Alliance Between Electoral Preferences and Petroleum Pumping Patterns. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

International Journal of Petroleum Politics and Public Opinion


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fueling the Vote: An Unlikely Alliance Between Electoral Preferences and Petroleum Pumping Patterns. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Ethical and Sustainable Energy Research (SESER)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fueling the Vote: An Unlikely Alliance Between Electoral Preferences and Petroleum Pumping Patterns with an abstract of This study delves into the perplexing relationship between electoral behavior in Vermont and the consumption of gasoline in the Cayman Islands. Analyzing comprehensive data obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research team applied rigorous statistical methods to scrutinize this seemingly incongruous linkage. Surprisingly, a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9757193 with a p-value less than 0.01 emerged for the period spanning from 1980 to 2020, indicating a strong association between votes cast for the Democratic presidential candidate in Vermont and the volume of gasoline dispensed in the Cayman Islands. The implications of these findings elicit a range of questions, prompting us to explore the intricate dynamics underlying this unexpected relationship. Thus, this paper not only sheds light on an unprecedented convergence but also serves as a testament to the capricious nature of electoral choices and the enigmatic forces that govern them.

ChatGPT:

"electoral behavior Vermont," "gasoline consumption Cayman Islands," "MIT Election Data and Science Lab," "Harvard Dataverse," "Energy Information Administration," "correlation coefficient gasoline consumption voting patterns," "Democratic presidential candidate Vermont," "gasoline volume Cayman Islands 1980-2020," "unexpected relationship voting patterns gasoline consumption"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Vermont
Detailed data title: Total votes cast for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Vermont
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Vermont

Gasoline pumped in Cayman Islands
Detailed data title: Volume of gasoline pumped consumed in Cayman Islands in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Gasoline pumped in Cayman Islands

Correlation r = 0.9757193 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9520282 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Gasoline pumped in Cayman Islands) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Vermont) over the 11 years from 1980 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.06E-7. 0.0000003061407385763703400000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 3.06E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,266,472 random variables You don't actually need 3 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.91, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19801984198819921996200020042008201220162020
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Vermont (Total votes)8195295730115775133592137894149022184067219262199239178573242820
Gasoline pumped in Cayman Islands (Million Barrels/Day)0.2777190.3173930.40.50.50.6292620.7457921.048770.8646850.8623220.985358




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([81952,95730,115775,133592,137894,149022,184067,219262,199239,178573,242820,])
array_2 = np.array([0.277719,0.317393,0.4,0.5,0.5,0.629262,0.745792,1.04877,0.864685,0.862322,0.985358,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Vermont"
array_2_name = "Gasoline pumped in Cayman Islands"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 4589 · Black Variable ID: 26038 · Red Variable ID: 24278
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0