about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,545 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Democratic Senators in Kentucky and the second variable is The number of construction equipment operators in Kentucky.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The Democrats just couldn't build a winning platform in Kentucky, so the construction equipment operators decided to pave a different career path. It seems like the blueprints for political success were a bit too rocky, and these operators were ready to dig their way out of the partisan gridlock. It's a concrete reminder that in the construction of democracy, every vote counts, or you might just find your prospects collapsing like a poorly built house of cards.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a pop art style image of a sleepy Kentucky town scene with scattered Democrat votes for Senators and abandoned ballot boxes symbolizing uncounted voices. In the background, a group of construction equipment operators leaving behind the dusty roads and idle machinery, to represent pursuing new horizons and the shifting tides of change in democracy. Fill the scene with vibrant colors and bold outlines to capture the symbolic significance and contrast of the elements. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Democrat votes for Senators in Kentucky and The number of construction equipment operators in Kentucky. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Voxel art Cutsy graphics Steampunk Pop art High-tech
ChatGPT: Pop art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Democrat votes for Senators in Kentucky and The number of construction equipment operators in Kentucky, in the following situation: The Democrats just couldn't build a winning platform in Kentucky, so the construction equipment operators decided to pave a different career path. It seems like the blueprints for political success were a bit too rocky, and these operators were ready to dig their way out of the partisan gridlock. It's a concrete reminder that in the construction of democracy, every vote counts, or you might just find your prospects collapsing like a poorly built house of cards.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a quiet Kentucky town, Democrat votes for Senators lie scattered, forgotten and uncounted, while a group of construction equipment operators embark on a new journey, leaving behind the dusty roads and bulldozed fields in pursuit of different horizons. The abandoned ballot boxes and the idle machinery stand as silent witnesses to the shifting tides of change, reminding us that in the construction of democracy, every vote and every worker plays a pivotal role.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Pop art ] and depicting this scene: In a quiet Kentucky town, Democrat votes for Senators lie scattered, forgotten and uncounted, while a group of construction equipment operators embark on a new journey, leaving behind the dusty roads and bulldozed fields in pursuit of different horizons. The abandoned ballot boxes and the idle machinery stand as silent witnesses to the shifting tides of change, reminding us that in the construction of democracy, every vote and every worker plays a pivotal role. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a pop art style image of a sleepy Kentucky town scene with scattered Democrat votes for Senators and abandoned ballot boxes symbolizing uncounted voices. In the background, a group of construction equipment operators leaving behind the dusty roads and idle machinery, to represent pursuing new horizons and the shifting tides of change in democracy. Fill the scene with vibrant colors and bold outlines to capture the symbolic significance and contrast of the elements.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Democrat votes for Senators in Kentucky caused The number of construction equipment operators in Kentucky to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Digging Deeper: The Political Impact on Kentucky's Construction Industry

Journal of Southern Economic Development

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Kentucky and The number of construction equipment operators in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9669941 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Digging Deeper: The Political Impact on Kentucky's Construction Industry"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper digs into the surprising correlation between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators in the Bluegrass State. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9669941 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2003 to 2020. The findings suggest that there may be more at play than meets the eye in the construction industry's relationship with political preferences. Join us as we unearth the unexpected ties between voting patterns and the construction workforce in this illuminating study!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Kentucky and The number of construction equipment operators in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Digging Deeper: The Political Impact on Kentucky's Construction Industry"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper digs into the surprising correlation between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators in the Bluegrass State. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9669941 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2003 to 2020. The findings suggest that there may be more at play than meets the eye in the construction industry's relationship with political preferences. Join us as we unearth the unexpected ties between voting patterns and the construction workforce in this illuminating study!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The construction industry is a cornerstone of any thriving economy, with heavy machinery and rugged equipment shaping the landscape like a sculptor working with clay. In the Bluegrass State of Kentucky, the political climate is as complex as a backhoe’s hydraulic system, with political affiliations running as deep as the foundations of a new skyscraper.

In this research, we set out to unearth the unexpected correlation between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators. Our aim was to dig through the political soil and unearth any hidden connections that might have been buried beneath the surface.

For years, the political landscape in Kentucky has been as tumultuous as a construction site during rush hour. With countless votes cast and political allegiances shifting like tectonic plates, the question arose: could there be an underlying relationship between these political inclinations and the workforce that operates the heavy machinery crucial to the state's infrastructure?

We dived into the treasure trove of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, the Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics in search of answers. What we uncovered was not just soil and sediment but a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9669941 and a p-value less than 0.01. It was a discovery that sent shockwaves through the research team, much like the reverberations of a piledriver on a construction site.

As we delved deeper, it became apparent that there is more than mere coincidence at play here. The statistical evidence pointed to a strong relationship between the political preferences of Kentuckians and the number of individuals operating heavy construction equipment. Could it be that political leanings influence career choices in the construction industry, or is this merely the result of serendipitous statistical quirks?

In this paper, we proudly present our findings, hoping to enlighten the academic community with an unexpectedly wry and picturesque illustration of the seemingly mundane relationship between politics and the construction industry. So, grab your hard hats and get ready to excavate the surprising ties between voting patterns and the workforce behind Kentucky's construction boom!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Kentucky and The number of construction equipment operators in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Digging Deeper: The Political Impact on Kentucky's Construction Industry"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper digs into the surprising correlation between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators in the Bluegrass State. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9669941 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2003 to 2020. The findings suggest that there may be more at play than meets the eye in the construction industry's relationship with political preferences. Join us as we unearth the unexpected ties between voting patterns and the construction workforce in this illuminating study!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The construction industry is a cornerstone of any thriving economy, with heavy machinery and rugged equipment shaping the landscape like a sculptor working with clay. In the Bluegrass State of Kentucky, the political climate is as complex as a backhoe’s hydraulic system, with political affiliations running as deep as the foundations of a new skyscraper.
In this research, we set out to unearth the unexpected correlation between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators. Our aim was to dig through the political soil and unearth any hidden connections that might have been buried beneath the surface.
For years, the political landscape in Kentucky has been as tumultuous as a construction site during rush hour. With countless votes cast and political allegiances shifting like tectonic plates, the question arose: could there be an underlying relationship between these political inclinations and the workforce that operates the heavy machinery crucial to the state's infrastructure?
We dived into the treasure trove of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, the Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics in search of answers. What we uncovered was not just soil and sediment but a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9669941 and a p-value less than 0.01. It was a discovery that sent shockwaves through the research team, much like the reverberations of a piledriver on a construction site.
As we delved deeper, it became apparent that there is more than mere coincidence at play here. The statistical evidence pointed to a strong relationship between the political preferences of Kentuckians and the number of individuals operating heavy construction equipment. Could it be that political leanings influence career choices in the construction industry, or is this merely the result of serendipitous statistical quirks?
In this paper, we proudly present our findings, hoping to enlighten the academic community with an unexpectedly wry and picturesque illustration of the seemingly mundane relationship between politics and the construction industry. So, grab your hard hats and get ready to excavate the surprising ties between voting patterns and the workforce behind Kentucky's construction boom!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The surprising correlation between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators has garnered academic interest in recent years. Smith et al. (2015) delved into the socio-political dynamics of Kentucky, exploring the implications of political affiliations on the state's labor force. Their findings hinted at potential connections between voting behavior and occupational choices, setting the stage for further investigation into this uncharted territory.

However, as we dig deeper into the literature, it is pertinent to mention Doe and Jones' comprehensive study on labor market trends in Kentucky (2018). Their work sheds light on the nuances of the construction industry and political influences, providing a solid foundation for our current research. The authors find a plethora of factors influencing career choices, but it is our task to sieve through the data and excavate the hidden gems of correlation within the rubble of statistical noise.

Turning to more general works, "The Economics of Politics" by Brown (2017) and "Labor Market Dynamics" by Taylor (2019) offer valuable insights into the interplay between political decisions and workforce dynamics. As we navigate through these intellectual terrains, it becomes clear that the intersection of politics and labor is akin to navigating a bulldozer through a maze – unpredictable, but full of potential surprises.

On a more whimsical note, the fiction novels "The House That Politics Built" by Harper Lee and "The Grapes of Wrath...Because Construction Equipment Needs Grapes Too" by John Steinbeck, while not directly related to our topic, serve as a poignant reminder that literature, much like statistics, can also be open to unexpected interpretations and associations. It's as if these works are beckoning us to break new ground in our understanding of the curious ties between political leanings and the construction industry.

In the realm of popular culture, the meme "Bernie Sanders in a Hard Hat" has circulated widely on the internet, blending humor with our topic at hand. This illustrates how the imagery of politicians, construction, and labor can overlap in amusing and unexpected ways, much like the unearthing of a fossil while digging for plumbing pipes.

As we progress through this literary landscape, it is evident that our quest to uncover the connection between political voting patterns and the construction workforce is not only an academic pursuit but also a journey filled with unexpected twists and turns. The dots between Democrat votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators may seem distant at first, but as we shall see, they are closer than a pair of bolt cutters in a construction worker's toolbox.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Kentucky and The number of construction equipment operators in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Digging Deeper: The Political Impact on Kentucky's Construction Industry"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper digs into the surprising correlation between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators in the Bluegrass State. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9669941 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2003 to 2020. The findings suggest that there may be more at play than meets the eye in the construction industry's relationship with political preferences. Join us as we unearth the unexpected ties between voting patterns and the construction workforce in this illuminating study!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The construction industry is a cornerstone of any thriving economy, with heavy machinery and rugged equipment shaping the landscape like a sculptor working with clay. In the Bluegrass State of Kentucky, the political climate is as complex as a backhoe’s hydraulic system, with political affiliations running as deep as the foundations of a new skyscraper.
In this research, we set out to unearth the unexpected correlation between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators. Our aim was to dig through the political soil and unearth any hidden connections that might have been buried beneath the surface.
For years, the political landscape in Kentucky has been as tumultuous as a construction site during rush hour. With countless votes cast and political allegiances shifting like tectonic plates, the question arose: could there be an underlying relationship between these political inclinations and the workforce that operates the heavy machinery crucial to the state's infrastructure?
We dived into the treasure trove of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, the Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics in search of answers. What we uncovered was not just soil and sediment but a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9669941 and a p-value less than 0.01. It was a discovery that sent shockwaves through the research team, much like the reverberations of a piledriver on a construction site.
As we delved deeper, it became apparent that there is more than mere coincidence at play here. The statistical evidence pointed to a strong relationship between the political preferences of Kentuckians and the number of individuals operating heavy construction equipment. Could it be that political leanings influence career choices in the construction industry, or is this merely the result of serendipitous statistical quirks?
In this paper, we proudly present our findings, hoping to enlighten the academic community with an unexpectedly wry and picturesque illustration of the seemingly mundane relationship between politics and the construction industry. So, grab your hard hats and get ready to excavate the surprising ties between voting patterns and the workforce behind Kentucky's construction boom!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the entangled threads of politics and construction equipment operators in the state of Kentucky, our research team employed a methodological approach that was as meticulous as laying down a perfect foundation for a building - with a few unexpected twists and turns thrown in for good measure.

First, we combed through the abundant data sources from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. We sifted through these virtual gold mines as if panning for data nuggets in a river of information, meticulously selecting and cross-referencing datasets from 2003 to 2020 to capture the ebb and flow of political tides and construction workforce numbers.

Our initial data excavation involved retrieving the total number of Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the corresponding figures for construction equipment operators. Like intrepid explorers in uncharted territory, we ventured into the statistical jungle, wielding our digital machetes to clear a path through the thicket of numbers and excel sheets.

Having acquired these datasets, we then undertook a sophisticated statistical analysis. This was no mere walk in the park; it was more like navigating a labyrinth of numbers, with the labyrinth architect being a mischievous statistics professor. We employed the robust Pearson's correlation coefficient to unravel any potential associations, ensuring that our analysis was as sturdy as a steel beam in a high-rise building.

Moreover, we utilized a clever time series analysis to trace the evolution of Democratic votes for Senators and the fluctuating numbers of construction equipment operators over the 17-year period. This method allowed us to capture the dynamic nature of both political preferences and workforce composition, much like watching a fascinating dance between political ideology and occupational choices.

In addition to these rigorous statistical methods, we employed a bit of unconventional approach - we held a "Debate and Dig" session, where our research team engaged in spirited discussions while simultaneously excavating through the data. This exercise not only provided an opportunity for intellectual exchange but also allowed us to uncover hidden gems within the datasets, much like unearthing buried treasure while engaged in a lively debate.

To ensure the robustness of our findings, we performed sensitivity analyses and robustness checks, inspecting the data from different angles as if scrutinizing a newly constructed building for any structural imperfections.

In the end, through this comprehensive methodological approach, we unearthed a surprising correlation between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators, shedding light on a previously overlooked relationship with all the delight and wonder of discovering a hidden passageway in an ancient archaeological site.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Kentucky and The number of construction equipment operators in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9669941, r-squared of 0.9350775, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Digging Deeper: The Political Impact on Kentucky's Construction Industry"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper digs into the surprising correlation between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators in the Bluegrass State. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9669941 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2003 to 2020. The findings suggest that there may be more at play than meets the eye in the construction industry's relationship with political preferences. Join us as we unearth the unexpected ties between voting patterns and the construction workforce in this illuminating study!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The construction industry is a cornerstone of any thriving economy, with heavy machinery and rugged equipment shaping the landscape like a sculptor working with clay. In the Bluegrass State of Kentucky, the political climate is as complex as a backhoe’s hydraulic system, with political affiliations running as deep as the foundations of a new skyscraper.
In this research, we set out to unearth the unexpected correlation between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators. Our aim was to dig through the political soil and unearth any hidden connections that might have been buried beneath the surface.
For years, the political landscape in Kentucky has been as tumultuous as a construction site during rush hour. With countless votes cast and political allegiances shifting like tectonic plates, the question arose: could there be an underlying relationship between these political inclinations and the workforce that operates the heavy machinery crucial to the state's infrastructure?
We dived into the treasure trove of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, the Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics in search of answers. What we uncovered was not just soil and sediment but a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9669941 and a p-value less than 0.01. It was a discovery that sent shockwaves through the research team, much like the reverberations of a piledriver on a construction site.
As we delved deeper, it became apparent that there is more than mere coincidence at play here. The statistical evidence pointed to a strong relationship between the political preferences of Kentuckians and the number of individuals operating heavy construction equipment. Could it be that political leanings influence career choices in the construction industry, or is this merely the result of serendipitous statistical quirks?
In this paper, we proudly present our findings, hoping to enlighten the academic community with an unexpectedly wry and picturesque illustration of the seemingly mundane relationship between politics and the construction industry. So, grab your hard hats and get ready to excavate the surprising ties between voting patterns and the workforce behind Kentucky's construction boom!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our research team unearthed a striking correlation between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators in the Bluegrass State. The correlation coefficient of 0.9669941 and an r-squared value of 0.9350775 provided compelling evidence of a strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the likelihood of this correlation occurring by mere chance is as improbable as finding a unicorn operating a bulldozer.

Figure 1 presents a scatterplot visualizing this surprising correlation, showcasing the undeniable connection between political preferences and the construction workforce in Kentucky. The scatterplot is as captivating as a suspenseful mystery novel, with each data point telling a story of its own, weaving a narrative of political influence on career choices in the construction industry.

These findings shed light on a previously overlooked facet of the construction industry, likening the impact of political preferences to the ripple effect of a well-placed dynamite blast. It appears that the political landscape of Kentucky is not just shaping policies but also leaving a palpable imprint on the composition of the construction workforce.

As surprising as it may seem, the correlation between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators has implications as weighty as a dump truck full of statistical significance. This unexpected association invites further exploration into the intricate interplay between political dynamics and occupational choices, offering a unique lens through which to view the intersection of politics and the labor market.

In conclusion, our findings provide compelling evidence that the construction industry in Kentucky is not immune to the sway of political currents, shedding light on the covert influence of political preferences on the composition of the state's construction workforce. This illuminating study unveils a remarkably robust connection, demonstrating that the political landscape reaches far beyond the ballot box, leaving an indelible mark on industries as sturdy as the steel girders that support them.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Kentucky and The number of construction equipment operators in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Digging Deeper: The Political Impact on Kentucky's Construction Industry"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper digs into the surprising correlation between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators in the Bluegrass State. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9669941 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2003 to 2020. The findings suggest that there may be more at play than meets the eye in the construction industry's relationship with political preferences. Join us as we unearth the unexpected ties between voting patterns and the construction workforce in this illuminating study!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The surprising correlation between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators has garnered academic interest in recent years. Smith et al. (2015) delved into the socio-political dynamics of Kentucky, exploring the implications of political affiliations on the state's labor force. Their findings hinted at potential connections between voting behavior and occupational choices, setting the stage for further investigation into this uncharted territory.
However, as we dig deeper into the literature, it is pertinent to mention Doe and Jones' comprehensive study on labor market trends in Kentucky (2018). Their work sheds light on the nuances of the construction industry and political influences, providing a solid foundation for our current research. The authors find a plethora of factors influencing career choices, but it is our task to sieve through the data and excavate the hidden gems of correlation within the rubble of statistical noise.
Turning to more general works, "The Economics of Politics" by Brown (2017) and "Labor Market Dynamics" by Taylor (2019) offer valuable insights into the interplay between political decisions and workforce dynamics. As we navigate through these intellectual terrains, it becomes clear that the intersection of politics and labor is akin to navigating a bulldozer through a maze – unpredictable, but full of potential surprises.
On a more whimsical note, the fiction novels "The House That Politics Built" by Harper Lee and "The Grapes of Wrath...Because Construction Equipment Needs Grapes Too" by John Steinbeck, while not directly related to our topic, serve as a poignant reminder that literature, much like statistics, can also be open to unexpected interpretations and associations. It's as if these works are beckoning us to break new ground in our understanding of the curious ties between political leanings and the construction industry.
In the realm of popular culture, the meme "Bernie Sanders in a Hard Hat" has circulated widely on the internet, blending humor with our topic at hand. This illustrates how the imagery of politicians, construction, and labor can overlap in amusing and unexpected ways, much like the unearthing of a fossil while digging for plumbing pipes.
As we progress through this literary landscape, it is evident that our quest to uncover the connection between political voting patterns and the construction workforce is not only an academic pursuit but also a journey filled with unexpected twists and turns. The dots between Democrat votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators may seem distant at first, but as we shall see, they are closer than a pair of bolt cutters in a construction worker's toolbox.

[[RESULTS]]
Our research team unearthed a striking correlation between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators in the Bluegrass State. The correlation coefficient of 0.9669941 and an r-squared value of 0.9350775 provided compelling evidence of a strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the likelihood of this correlation occurring by mere chance is as improbable as finding a unicorn operating a bulldozer.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot visualizing this surprising correlation, showcasing the undeniable connection between political preferences and the construction workforce in Kentucky. The scatterplot is as captivating as a suspenseful mystery novel, with each data point telling a story of its own, weaving a narrative of political influence on career choices in the construction industry.
These findings shed light on a previously overlooked facet of the construction industry, likening the impact of political preferences to the ripple effect of a well-placed dynamite blast. It appears that the political landscape of Kentucky is not just shaping policies but also leaving a palpable imprint on the composition of the construction workforce.
As surprising as it may seem, the correlation between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators has implications as weighty as a dump truck full of statistical significance. This unexpected association invites further exploration into the intricate interplay between political dynamics and occupational choices, offering a unique lens through which to view the intersection of politics and the labor market.
In conclusion, our findings provide compelling evidence that the construction industry in Kentucky is not immune to the sway of political currents, shedding light on the covert influence of political preferences on the composition of the state's construction workforce. This illuminating study unveils a remarkably robust connection, demonstrating that the political landscape reaches far beyond the ballot box, leaving an indelible mark on industries as sturdy as the steel girders that support them.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study provide a compelling addition to the existing literature, shedding light on the surprising and strong connection between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators in the Bluegrass State. The findings not only corroborate but also significantly bolster the prior research on this peculiar association.

Taking a deeper look into our literature review, we recall the work of Smith et al. (2015), who hinted at potential connections between voting behavior and occupational choices in Kentucky. Our study provides strong empirical support for their suppositions, as we unearthed a correlation so robust that it could lift a ton of bricks while whistling "The Star-Spangled Banner."

Similarly, Doe and Jones' (2018) comprehensive study on labor market trends in Kentucky laid the groundwork for our investigation. Our findings align with their observations, demonstrating the palpable imprint of political preferences on the composition of the state's construction workforce. It's as if we've located the buried treasure they pointed to amidst the statistical sandpile.

Turning to the more whimsical elements of our literature review, we are reminded of the unexpected twists and turns in our academic pursuit. The memes and fiction novels, while not directly related to our specific topic, seem to have foreshadowed the surprising correlation we uncovered. It's almost as if they were laying breadcrumbs for us to follow, leading us to this unexpected revelation. In the end, it appears that even the most light-hearted of references can bear the weight of empirical evidence.

On a more serious note, the findings from our study echo the observations made in "The Economics of Politics" by Brown (2017) and "Labor Market Dynamics" by Taylor (2019). The robust correlation we discovered underscores the overarching impact of political decision-making on workforce dynamics, lending support to the notion that the political landscape's influence extends beyond policy-making and legislative processes. It's as if the political currents are shaping not only laws but also the very fabric of Kentucky's labor force.

In light of the results of our study, the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators is not only significant but also as clear as a sunny day – or perhaps as clear as a politician's promises during an election year. Our findings invite further exploration into the intricate interplay between political dynamics and occupational choices, offering a unique lens through which to view the intersection of politics and the labor market. As we continue to turn over new ground, the revelations from this study suggest that the political landscape's impact reaches further than previously imagined, leaving an indelible mark on industries as sturdy as the steel girders that support them.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Kentucky and The number of construction equipment operators in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Digging Deeper: The Political Impact on Kentucky's Construction Industry"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper digs into the surprising correlation between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators in the Bluegrass State. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9669941 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2003 to 2020. The findings suggest that there may be more at play than meets the eye in the construction industry's relationship with political preferences. Join us as we unearth the unexpected ties between voting patterns and the construction workforce in this illuminating study!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The construction industry is a cornerstone of any thriving economy, with heavy machinery and rugged equipment shaping the landscape like a sculptor working with clay. In the Bluegrass State of Kentucky, the political climate is as complex as a backhoe’s hydraulic system, with political affiliations running as deep as the foundations of a new skyscraper.
In this research, we set out to unearth the unexpected correlation between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators. Our aim was to dig through the political soil and unearth any hidden connections that might have been buried beneath the surface.
For years, the political landscape in Kentucky has been as tumultuous as a construction site during rush hour. With countless votes cast and political allegiances shifting like tectonic plates, the question arose: could there be an underlying relationship between these political inclinations and the workforce that operates the heavy machinery crucial to the state's infrastructure?
We dived into the treasure trove of data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, the Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics in search of answers. What we uncovered was not just soil and sediment but a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9669941 and a p-value less than 0.01. It was a discovery that sent shockwaves through the research team, much like the reverberations of a piledriver on a construction site.
As we delved deeper, it became apparent that there is more than mere coincidence at play here. The statistical evidence pointed to a strong relationship between the political preferences of Kentuckians and the number of individuals operating heavy construction equipment. Could it be that political leanings influence career choices in the construction industry, or is this merely the result of serendipitous statistical quirks?
In this paper, we proudly present our findings, hoping to enlighten the academic community with an unexpectedly wry and picturesque illustration of the seemingly mundane relationship between politics and the construction industry. So, grab your hard hats and get ready to excavate the surprising ties between voting patterns and the workforce behind Kentucky's construction boom!

[[RESULTS]]
Our research team unearthed a striking correlation between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators in the Bluegrass State. The correlation coefficient of 0.9669941 and an r-squared value of 0.9350775 provided compelling evidence of a strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the likelihood of this correlation occurring by mere chance is as improbable as finding a unicorn operating a bulldozer.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot visualizing this surprising correlation, showcasing the undeniable connection between political preferences and the construction workforce in Kentucky. The scatterplot is as captivating as a suspenseful mystery novel, with each data point telling a story of its own, weaving a narrative of political influence on career choices in the construction industry.
These findings shed light on a previously overlooked facet of the construction industry, likening the impact of political preferences to the ripple effect of a well-placed dynamite blast. It appears that the political landscape of Kentucky is not just shaping policies but also leaving a palpable imprint on the composition of the construction workforce.
As surprising as it may seem, the correlation between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators has implications as weighty as a dump truck full of statistical significance. This unexpected association invites further exploration into the intricate interplay between political dynamics and occupational choices, offering a unique lens through which to view the intersection of politics and the labor market.
In conclusion, our findings provide compelling evidence that the construction industry in Kentucky is not immune to the sway of political currents, shedding light on the covert influence of political preferences on the composition of the state's construction workforce. This illuminating study unveils a remarkably robust connection, demonstrating that the political landscape reaches far beyond the ballot box, leaving an indelible mark on industries as sturdy as the steel girders that support them.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we wrap up this study, it's clear that the connection between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators is as solid as a reinforced concrete foundation. Our findings have revealed a correlation that's stronger than a load-bearing wall, with a statistical significance that's more striking than a neon safety vest on a moonless night.

The implications of this correlation are as vast as the Kentucky skyline, prompting us to ponder whether political preferences are reshaping the construction industry in ways we never dared to imagine. Perhaps there's an underground network of political influence that's shaping career paths as stealthily as a mole tunneling through freshly laid asphalt.

But let's not bulldoze past the humor in this discovery. Who would've thought that the political climate in Kentucky could have such a tangible impact on the literal landscape of the state? It's as if the ballot box is wielding a wrecking ball of influence, nudging individuals toward careers in heavy machinery operation as if it were the latest political fad.

In the grand scheme of statistical curiosities, this correlation takes the cake, or in this case, the hard hat. It's as unexpected as finding a jackhammer in a field of bluegrass, prompting us to rethink the bridges between politics, employment, and the physical infrastructure that punctuates our daily lives.

So, as we don our researcher hats one last time, it's clear that no more digging is needed in this arena. Our findings stand firm like a skyscraper, and it's time to shift our focus to new frontiers of inquiry where political tides may shape unexpected landscapes. The construction industry may have had its political reckoning, and it's left us all with a deeper appreciation for the ways in which voting preferences can echo far beyond the ballot box.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Digging Deeper: The Political Impact on Kentucky's Construction Industry. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Southern Economic Development


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Digging Deeper: The Political Impact on Kentucky's Construction Industry. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for Analyzing Regional Economic Trends (SARET)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Digging Deeper: The Political Impact on Kentucky's Construction Industry with an abstract of This paper digs into the surprising correlation between Democratic votes for Senators in Kentucky and the number of construction equipment operators in the Bluegrass State. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9669941 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2003 to 2020. The findings suggest that there may be more at play than meets the eye in the construction industry's relationship with political preferences. Join us as we unearth the unexpected ties between voting patterns and the construction workforce in this illuminating study!

ChatGPT:

Kentucky construction industry, political impact, Democratic votes, Senators, construction equipment operators, correlation, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, voting patterns, construction workforce, Kentucky political preferences.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Democratic Senators in Kentucky
Detailed data title: Percentage of votes cast for Federal Democrat Senate candidates in Kentucky
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Democratic Senators in Kentucky

The number of construction equipment operators in Kentucky
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of operating engineers and other construction equipment operators in Kentucky
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of construction equipment operators in Kentucky

Correlation r = 0.9669941 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9350775 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of construction equipment operators in Kentucky) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Democratic Senators in Kentucky) over the 6 years from 2003 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0016. 0.0016161082083372283000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.16% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 619 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.72, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420082010201420162020
Votes for Democratic Senators in Kentucky (Percentage of votes)49.343247.034444.248540.720942.724538.2312
The number of construction equipment operators in Kentucky (Laborers)1011091907020681068404350




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  6. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([49.3432,47.0344,44.2485,40.7209,42.7245,38.2312,])
array_2 = np.array([10110,9190,7020,6810,6840,4350,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Democratic Senators in Kentucky"
array_2_name = "The number of construction equipment operators in Kentucky"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 4545 · Black Variable ID: 26390 · Red Variable ID: 8532
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0