about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,502 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Google searches for 'ice bath' and the second variable is Total likes of Extra History YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The frigid waters of the ice bath prompt viewers to seek warmth and comfort, leading them to cozy up with a hot beverage and binge-watch Extra History. As they shiver and shake, they hit the like button repeatedly in an attempt to generate some digital heat. This ultimately boosts the total likes of Extra History YouTube videos. After all, nothing warms the heart like a good history lesson and the thought of never, ever taking an ice bath.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Concept art ] Create an image showing a laptop placed on a wooden desk. The laptop screen displays a Google search for "ice bath" with the search results visible. Next to the laptop, a person is immersed in an icy bath with steam rising from the water. The person has a shivering expression and is reaching out toward the laptop. On the other side of the desk, a cozy scene is depicted with a mug of steaming hot beverage and another laptop playing Extra History videos. The person's actions are interacting with both the icy bath and the cozy setting, creating an interesting contrast in the scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Google searches for 'ice bath' and Total likes of Extra History YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cubism Futuristic Art nouveau Concept art Cute cartoon
ChatGPT: Concept art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Google searches for 'ice bath' and Total likes of Extra History YouTube videos, in the following situation: The frigid waters of the ice bath prompt viewers to seek warmth and comfort, leading them to cozy up with a hot beverage and binge-watch Extra History. As they shiver and shake, they hit the like button repeatedly in an attempt to generate some digital heat. This ultimately boosts the total likes of Extra History YouTube videos. After all, nothing warms the heart like a good history lesson and the thought of never, ever taking an ice bath.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, we see a laptop with a Google search for "ice bath" on the screen, while a person is shown engulfed in the icy waters. Next to them, a cozy setting is depicted, with a steaming mug of hot beverage and a laptop playing Extra History videos. As the person shivers from the cold, they repeatedly hit the like button on the videos, increasing the total likes counter.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Concept art ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, we see a laptop with a Google search for "ice bath" on the screen, while a person is shown engulfed in the icy waters. Next to them, a cozy setting is depicted, with a steaming mug of hot beverage and a laptop playing Extra History videos. As the person shivers from the cold, they repeatedly hit the like button on the videos, increasing the total likes counter. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Concept art ] Create an image showing a laptop placed on a wooden desk. The laptop screen displays a Google search for "ice bath" with the search results visible. Next to the laptop, a person is immersed in an icy bath with steam rising from the water. The person has a shivering expression and is reaching out toward the laptop. On the other side of the desk, a cozy scene is depicted with a mug of steaming hot beverage and another laptop playing Extra History videos. The person's actions are interacting with both the icy bath and the cozy setting, creating an interesting contrast in the scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in ice bath (Google searches for 'ice bath') caused Total likes of Extra History YouTube videos to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Chill-Vibes and Chills: Exploring the Frosty Relationship between Google Searches for 'Ice Bath' and Total Likes of Extra History YouTube Videos

The Journal of Internet Trends and Cultural Phenomena

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'ice bath' and Total likes of Extra History YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9230482 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Chill-Vibes and Chills: Exploring the Frosty Relationship between Google Searches for 'Ice Bath' and Total Likes of Extra History YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the frosty relationship between Google searches for 'ice bath' and total likes of the YouTube channel Extra History, known for its engaging historical content. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube, we uncover a surprising correlation between the two seemingly disparate subjects. Our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.9230482 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2023. The findings uncover an intriguing link between the desire for icy immersion and the appreciation of historical narratives, shedding light on the whimsical and unexpected connections within the vast realm of online behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'ice bath' and Total likes of Extra History YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Chill-Vibes and Chills: Exploring the Frosty Relationship between Google Searches for 'Ice Bath' and Total Likes of Extra History YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the frosty relationship between Google searches for 'ice bath' and total likes of the YouTube channel Extra History, known for its engaging historical content. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube, we uncover a surprising correlation between the two seemingly disparate subjects. Our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.9230482 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2023. The findings uncover an intriguing link between the desire for icy immersion and the appreciation of historical narratives, shedding light on the whimsical and unexpected connections within the vast realm of online behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The exploration of human behavior in the online sphere has led to some unexpected findings and peculiar correlations. Amidst the vast expanse of internet data, seemingly disparate subjects occasionally find themselves entwined in a digital waltz, leaving researchers and casual observers alike scratching their heads in confusion.

In the realm of YouTube, where historical narratives and educational content flourish, one might not immediately draw a connection to the frigid world of 'ice baths.' Yet, as the behemoth that is the internet would have it, a peculiar relationship has emerged between the frequency of Google searches for 'ice bath' and the total likes garnered by the engaging videos of Extra History – a bond that is as frosty as it is confounding.

The notion of individuals plunging into ice-cold water while simultaneously indulging in tales of centuries past may initially seem as peculiar as a penguin wearing a top hat. However, as we delve into the data and unravel the threads of connection, an unexpected narrative emerges – one that intertwines the physical sensation of chilling with the mental stimulation of historical learning.

This study aims to venture into this uncharted territory and disentangle the web of causality, if any, between the search for frigid relief and the appreciation of edutainment. By examining the data obtained from Google Trends and YouTube analytics, we endeavor to shine a light on this curious correlation and offer insights that may potentially thaw the frosty mystery encompassing these seemingly unrelated topics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'ice bath' and Total likes of Extra History YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Chill-Vibes and Chills: Exploring the Frosty Relationship between Google Searches for 'Ice Bath' and Total Likes of Extra History YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the frosty relationship between Google searches for 'ice bath' and total likes of the YouTube channel Extra History, known for its engaging historical content. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube, we uncover a surprising correlation between the two seemingly disparate subjects. Our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.9230482 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2023. The findings uncover an intriguing link between the desire for icy immersion and the appreciation of historical narratives, shedding light on the whimsical and unexpected connections within the vast realm of online behavior.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The exploration of human behavior in the online sphere has led to some unexpected findings and peculiar correlations. Amidst the vast expanse of internet data, seemingly disparate subjects occasionally find themselves entwined in a digital waltz, leaving researchers and casual observers alike scratching their heads in confusion.
In the realm of YouTube, where historical narratives and educational content flourish, one might not immediately draw a connection to the frigid world of 'ice baths.' Yet, as the behemoth that is the internet would have it, a peculiar relationship has emerged between the frequency of Google searches for 'ice bath' and the total likes garnered by the engaging videos of Extra History – a bond that is as frosty as it is confounding.
The notion of individuals plunging into ice-cold water while simultaneously indulging in tales of centuries past may initially seem as peculiar as a penguin wearing a top hat. However, as we delve into the data and unravel the threads of connection, an unexpected narrative emerges – one that intertwines the physical sensation of chilling with the mental stimulation of historical learning.
This study aims to venture into this uncharted territory and disentangle the web of causality, if any, between the search for frigid relief and the appreciation of edutainment. By examining the data obtained from Google Trends and YouTube analytics, we endeavor to shine a light on this curious correlation and offer insights that may potentially thaw the frosty mystery encompassing these seemingly unrelated topics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Efforts to elucidate the enigmatic relationship between 'ice bath' searches on Google and the praise garnered by Extra History YouTube videos have prompted a hodgepodge of investigations. Smith et al. (2015) explored the psychological underpinnings of cold exposure and its potential impact on cognitive functions, while Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the realm of online video engagements and their peculiar trends. However, while these scholarly pursuits provide valuable insights into related domains, they fail to encapsulate the whimsical and ineffable bond between submerging oneself in frigid temperatures and clamoring for riveting historical narratives as observed in this context.

In "The Science of Cold: Exploring the Frosty Frontier," the authors elucidate the physiological and psychological effects of immersing oneself in icy waters, shedding light on the allure of this seemingly masochistic practice. Conversely, "Engaging Minds: Unraveling the Riddles of YouTube" tackles the intricate dynamics of online video consumption, offering keen observations on viewer behavior but neglecting to traverse the frozen tundra of 'ice bath' queries.

Moving beyond the staid confines of academic musings, we encounter Arthur C. Clarke's "2001: A Space Odyssey," where the chilling void of space serves as a metaphor for the vast expanse of internet mysteries. Meanwhile, Agatha Christie's "Murder on the Orient Express" imbibes the historical intrigue that resonates with the narratives depicted in Extra History, albeit without the icy undertones.

Additionally, the board game "Clue" provides a whimsical parallel, as players endeavor to solve a historical murder mystery, akin to the virtual sleuthing and historical revelations sought after in Extra History, all the while navigating the frosty corridors of potential guilt and innocence.

The interplay between these seemingly disparate works, each in its own way, underscores the elusive and entertaining nature of the digital waltz between 'ice baths' and Extra History. As we wade through this eclectic mix of literature and cultural references, we prepare to dive into the enigmatic realm of online behavior and savor the unexpected connective tissue that binds the frosty and the historical in the cybernetic tapestry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'ice bath' and Total likes of Extra History YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and YouTube . You used data from 2012 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Chill-Vibes and Chills: Exploring the Frosty Relationship between Google Searches for 'Ice Bath' and Total Likes of Extra History YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the frosty relationship between Google searches for 'ice bath' and total likes of the YouTube channel Extra History, known for its engaging historical content. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube, we uncover a surprising correlation between the two seemingly disparate subjects. Our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.9230482 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2023. The findings uncover an intriguing link between the desire for icy immersion and the appreciation of historical narratives, shedding light on the whimsical and unexpected connections within the vast realm of online behavior.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The exploration of human behavior in the online sphere has led to some unexpected findings and peculiar correlations. Amidst the vast expanse of internet data, seemingly disparate subjects occasionally find themselves entwined in a digital waltz, leaving researchers and casual observers alike scratching their heads in confusion.
In the realm of YouTube, where historical narratives and educational content flourish, one might not immediately draw a connection to the frigid world of 'ice baths.' Yet, as the behemoth that is the internet would have it, a peculiar relationship has emerged between the frequency of Google searches for 'ice bath' and the total likes garnered by the engaging videos of Extra History – a bond that is as frosty as it is confounding.
The notion of individuals plunging into ice-cold water while simultaneously indulging in tales of centuries past may initially seem as peculiar as a penguin wearing a top hat. However, as we delve into the data and unravel the threads of connection, an unexpected narrative emerges – one that intertwines the physical sensation of chilling with the mental stimulation of historical learning.
This study aims to venture into this uncharted territory and disentangle the web of causality, if any, between the search for frigid relief and the appreciation of edutainment. By examining the data obtained from Google Trends and YouTube analytics, we endeavor to shine a light on this curious correlation and offer insights that may potentially thaw the frosty mystery encompassing these seemingly unrelated topics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

This study employed a series of convoluted but captivating methods to ascertain the relationship between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the total likes of Extra History YouTube videos. The data collection process involved harnessing the mighty power of Google Trends and the labyrinthine depths of YouTube analytics.

The period under scrutiny spanned the years 2012 to 2023, capturing a substantial timeframe to observe any potential trends in online behavior relating to these icy and historical pursuits. The frequency of 'ice bath' searches and the total likes of Extra History videos were monitored and meticulously recorded at regular intervals.

To ensure the validity and reliability of the data, a time-series analysis was conducted to account for any seasonal or temporal variations that may have influenced the patterns observed. This was undertaken with the same care and precision as an ice sculptor chiseling a masterpiece from a formidable block of frozen water, ensuring that the fluctuations in user behavior were not misled by external factors.

The correlation between the trends in Google searches and YouTube likes was calculated using Pearson's correlation coefficient, and the statistical significance level was set at p < 0.01. This method allowed for the quantification of the relationship between these two seemingly incongruous phenomena, providing a numerical measure of the strength and direction of their association.

Additionally, various regression analyses were conducted to explore potential causality and inferential insights lurking beneath the surface of this enigmatic connection. The models used in these analyses were as robust and complex as an ancient iceberg, each layer representing a different facet of the relationship under scrutiny.

To further probe the nuances of this frosty correlation, sub-group analyses were performed to examine potential variations across different geographic regions and historical periods. This approach aimed to unveil any peculiarities in the relationship that might have been concealed within the broader scope of the data, casting a spotlight on the idiosyncrasies of online behavior across diverse contexts and timeframes.

The exploratory nature of this study necessitated an open-minded and inquisitive approach to the analysis, akin to an intrepid explorer navigating uncharted waters in search of a hidden treasure trove of insight. As such, the research team remained vigilant in acknowledging the limitations and potential confounders that may have influenced the findings, adopting a stance of healthy skepticism and intellectual humility throughout the investigative process.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'ice bath' and Total likes of Extra History YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and YouTube .

For the time period 2012 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9230482, r-squared of 0.8520180, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Chill-Vibes and Chills: Exploring the Frosty Relationship between Google Searches for 'Ice Bath' and Total Likes of Extra History YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the frosty relationship between Google searches for 'ice bath' and total likes of the YouTube channel Extra History, known for its engaging historical content. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube, we uncover a surprising correlation between the two seemingly disparate subjects. Our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.9230482 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2023. The findings uncover an intriguing link between the desire for icy immersion and the appreciation of historical narratives, shedding light on the whimsical and unexpected connections within the vast realm of online behavior.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The exploration of human behavior in the online sphere has led to some unexpected findings and peculiar correlations. Amidst the vast expanse of internet data, seemingly disparate subjects occasionally find themselves entwined in a digital waltz, leaving researchers and casual observers alike scratching their heads in confusion.
In the realm of YouTube, where historical narratives and educational content flourish, one might not immediately draw a connection to the frigid world of 'ice baths.' Yet, as the behemoth that is the internet would have it, a peculiar relationship has emerged between the frequency of Google searches for 'ice bath' and the total likes garnered by the engaging videos of Extra History – a bond that is as frosty as it is confounding.
The notion of individuals plunging into ice-cold water while simultaneously indulging in tales of centuries past may initially seem as peculiar as a penguin wearing a top hat. However, as we delve into the data and unravel the threads of connection, an unexpected narrative emerges – one that intertwines the physical sensation of chilling with the mental stimulation of historical learning.
This study aims to venture into this uncharted territory and disentangle the web of causality, if any, between the search for frigid relief and the appreciation of edutainment. By examining the data obtained from Google Trends and YouTube analytics, we endeavor to shine a light on this curious correlation and offer insights that may potentially thaw the frosty mystery encompassing these seemingly unrelated topics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from Google Trends and YouTube revealed a remarkably strong correlation between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the total likes of Extra History YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.9230482, indicating a highly positive association between the two variables. This finding suggests that there is a substantial relationship between the frequency of searches for 'ice bath' and the level of appreciation for historical content in the form of YouTube likes.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8520180 indicates that approximately 85.2% of the variability in the total likes of Extra History videos can be explained by the frequency of 'ice bath' searches. This high r-squared value underscores the strength of the relationship between these seemingly unrelated topics, highlighting the surprising degree of predictability in the likes garnered by historical educational videos based on the trends in searches for cold water immersion techniques.

Importantly, the statistical significance of the correlation was confirmed with a p-value of less than 0.01, providing robust evidence to support the presence of a meaningful relationship between the variables. This outcome indicates that the likelihood of observing such a strong association by random chance is extremely low, further solidifying the substantial nature of the discovered connection.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) depicting the relationship between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the total likes of Extra History YouTube videos visually demonstrates the strong positive correlation uncovered in this study. Each data point on the plot represents a specific time period within the range of 2012 to 2023, further exemplifying the consistent nature of the association over the years.

In conclusion, these results shed light on the intriguing interplay between the pursuit of icy revitalization and the enjoyment of historical narratives on the online platform. The robust correlation observed between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the total likes of Extra History YouTube videos unveils an unexpected bond, providing a chilly yet captivating glimpse into the whimsical connections that traverse the digital landscape.

Our findings serve as a reminder that the internet, much like a mysterious magician, continues to produce baffling and entertaining linkages between seemingly unrelated domains, forever keeping researchers and enthusiasts on their toes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'ice bath' and Total likes of Extra History YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Chill-Vibes and Chills: Exploring the Frosty Relationship between Google Searches for 'Ice Bath' and Total Likes of Extra History YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the frosty relationship between Google searches for 'ice bath' and total likes of the YouTube channel Extra History, known for its engaging historical content. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube, we uncover a surprising correlation between the two seemingly disparate subjects. Our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.9230482 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2023. The findings uncover an intriguing link between the desire for icy immersion and the appreciation of historical narratives, shedding light on the whimsical and unexpected connections within the vast realm of online behavior.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Efforts to elucidate the enigmatic relationship between 'ice bath' searches on Google and the praise garnered by Extra History YouTube videos have prompted a hodgepodge of investigations. Smith et al. (2015) explored the psychological underpinnings of cold exposure and its potential impact on cognitive functions, while Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the realm of online video engagements and their peculiar trends. However, while these scholarly pursuits provide valuable insights into related domains, they fail to encapsulate the whimsical and ineffable bond between submerging oneself in frigid temperatures and clamoring for riveting historical narratives as observed in this context.
In "The Science of Cold: Exploring the Frosty Frontier," the authors elucidate the physiological and psychological effects of immersing oneself in icy waters, shedding light on the allure of this seemingly masochistic practice. Conversely, "Engaging Minds: Unraveling the Riddles of YouTube" tackles the intricate dynamics of online video consumption, offering keen observations on viewer behavior but neglecting to traverse the frozen tundra of 'ice bath' queries.
Moving beyond the staid confines of academic musings, we encounter Arthur C. Clarke's "2001: A Space Odyssey," where the chilling void of space serves as a metaphor for the vast expanse of internet mysteries. Meanwhile, Agatha Christie's "Murder on the Orient Express" imbibes the historical intrigue that resonates with the narratives depicted in Extra History, albeit without the icy undertones.
Additionally, the board game "Clue" provides a whimsical parallel, as players endeavor to solve a historical murder mystery, akin to the virtual sleuthing and historical revelations sought after in Extra History, all the while navigating the frosty corridors of potential guilt and innocence.
The interplay between these seemingly disparate works, each in its own way, underscores the elusive and entertaining nature of the digital waltz between 'ice baths' and Extra History. As we wade through this eclectic mix of literature and cultural references, we prepare to dive into the enigmatic realm of online behavior and savor the unexpected connective tissue that binds the frosty and the historical in the cybernetic tapestry.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from Google Trends and YouTube revealed a remarkably strong correlation between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the total likes of Extra History YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.9230482, indicating a highly positive association between the two variables. This finding suggests that there is a substantial relationship between the frequency of searches for 'ice bath' and the level of appreciation for historical content in the form of YouTube likes.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8520180 indicates that approximately 85.2% of the variability in the total likes of Extra History videos can be explained by the frequency of 'ice bath' searches. This high r-squared value underscores the strength of the relationship between these seemingly unrelated topics, highlighting the surprising degree of predictability in the likes garnered by historical educational videos based on the trends in searches for cold water immersion techniques.
Importantly, the statistical significance of the correlation was confirmed with a p-value of less than 0.01, providing robust evidence to support the presence of a meaningful relationship between the variables. This outcome indicates that the likelihood of observing such a strong association by random chance is extremely low, further solidifying the substantial nature of the discovered connection.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) depicting the relationship between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the total likes of Extra History YouTube videos visually demonstrates the strong positive correlation uncovered in this study. Each data point on the plot represents a specific time period within the range of 2012 to 2023, further exemplifying the consistent nature of the association over the years.
In conclusion, these results shed light on the intriguing interplay between the pursuit of icy revitalization and the enjoyment of historical narratives on the online platform. The robust correlation observed between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the total likes of Extra History YouTube videos unveils an unexpected bond, providing a chilly yet captivating glimpse into the whimsical connections that traverse the digital landscape.
Our findings serve as a reminder that the internet, much like a mysterious magician, continues to produce baffling and entertaining linkages between seemingly unrelated domains, forever keeping researchers and enthusiasts on their toes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study illuminate a remarkable association between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the total likes of Extra History YouTube videos. Our results align with and extend prior research that has delved into the unexpected connections between seemingly unrelated topics, such as cold exposure and historical online content consumption.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9230482 indicates a highly positive relationship between the frequency of 'ice bath' searches and the level of appreciation for historical narratives. This supports Smith et al.'s (2015) exploration of the psychological underpinnings of cold exposure, showcasing the intriguing allure of icy immersion techniques and their impact on cognitive functions. It is evident that individuals drawn to the concept of plunging into frigid waters may also share an appreciation for the mental stimulation provided by historical storytelling.

Additionally, our findings echo the work of Doe and Jones (2018) in unraveling the whimsical and ineffable bond between online video engagements and their peculiar trends. The strong positive association observed in our study adds an intriguing dimension to their research, as it highlights that the desire for icy immersion may coincide with a penchant for engaging historical narratives in the online realm.

Moreover, harking back to the eclectic mix of literature and cultural references cited in the literature review, we now appreciate the earnestness with which we must consider even the most offbeat and whimsical of connections. The seemingly disparate works, such as "2001: A Space Odyssey," may indeed offer metaphorical insights into the vast expanse of internet mysteries, inviting us to consider the unexpected parallels between the chilling void of space and the frosty allure of 'ice baths.'

In light of these results, it becomes clear that the digital waltz between 'ice baths' and Extra History is not just a whimsical revelation but a substantial and meaningful connection worthy of further investigation and contemplation. As researchers, we are reminded that the digital landscape continues to surprise and entertain, much like an enigmatic magician performing baffling feats of connection before our very eyes.

In conclusion, our study contributes to the understanding of the enigmatic relationship between the pursuit of icy revitalization and the enjoyment of historical narratives on the online platform, shedding light on the whimsical but substantial connections that traverse the digital realm. As we thaw out from the chill of this unexpected discovery, we stand poised to delve further into the mysteries of online behavior and the frosty allure of 'ice baths' in the cybernetic tapestry of the internet.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'ice bath' and Total likes of Extra History YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Chill-Vibes and Chills: Exploring the Frosty Relationship between Google Searches for 'Ice Bath' and Total Likes of Extra History YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the frosty relationship between Google searches for 'ice bath' and total likes of the YouTube channel Extra History, known for its engaging historical content. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube, we uncover a surprising correlation between the two seemingly disparate subjects. Our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.9230482 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2023. The findings uncover an intriguing link between the desire for icy immersion and the appreciation of historical narratives, shedding light on the whimsical and unexpected connections within the vast realm of online behavior.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The exploration of human behavior in the online sphere has led to some unexpected findings and peculiar correlations. Amidst the vast expanse of internet data, seemingly disparate subjects occasionally find themselves entwined in a digital waltz, leaving researchers and casual observers alike scratching their heads in confusion.
In the realm of YouTube, where historical narratives and educational content flourish, one might not immediately draw a connection to the frigid world of 'ice baths.' Yet, as the behemoth that is the internet would have it, a peculiar relationship has emerged between the frequency of Google searches for 'ice bath' and the total likes garnered by the engaging videos of Extra History – a bond that is as frosty as it is confounding.
The notion of individuals plunging into ice-cold water while simultaneously indulging in tales of centuries past may initially seem as peculiar as a penguin wearing a top hat. However, as we delve into the data and unravel the threads of connection, an unexpected narrative emerges – one that intertwines the physical sensation of chilling with the mental stimulation of historical learning.
This study aims to venture into this uncharted territory and disentangle the web of causality, if any, between the search for frigid relief and the appreciation of edutainment. By examining the data obtained from Google Trends and YouTube analytics, we endeavor to shine a light on this curious correlation and offer insights that may potentially thaw the frosty mystery encompassing these seemingly unrelated topics.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from Google Trends and YouTube revealed a remarkably strong correlation between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the total likes of Extra History YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.9230482, indicating a highly positive association between the two variables. This finding suggests that there is a substantial relationship between the frequency of searches for 'ice bath' and the level of appreciation for historical content in the form of YouTube likes.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8520180 indicates that approximately 85.2% of the variability in the total likes of Extra History videos can be explained by the frequency of 'ice bath' searches. This high r-squared value underscores the strength of the relationship between these seemingly unrelated topics, highlighting the surprising degree of predictability in the likes garnered by historical educational videos based on the trends in searches for cold water immersion techniques.
Importantly, the statistical significance of the correlation was confirmed with a p-value of less than 0.01, providing robust evidence to support the presence of a meaningful relationship between the variables. This outcome indicates that the likelihood of observing such a strong association by random chance is extremely low, further solidifying the substantial nature of the discovered connection.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) depicting the relationship between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the total likes of Extra History YouTube videos visually demonstrates the strong positive correlation uncovered in this study. Each data point on the plot represents a specific time period within the range of 2012 to 2023, further exemplifying the consistent nature of the association over the years.
In conclusion, these results shed light on the intriguing interplay between the pursuit of icy revitalization and the enjoyment of historical narratives on the online platform. The robust correlation observed between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the total likes of Extra History YouTube videos unveils an unexpected bond, providing a chilly yet captivating glimpse into the whimsical connections that traverse the digital landscape.
Our findings serve as a reminder that the internet, much like a mysterious magician, continues to produce baffling and entertaining linkages between seemingly unrelated domains, forever keeping researchers and enthusiasts on their toes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has uncovered a surprising and remarkably strong correlation between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the total likes of Extra History YouTube videos. This unexpected relationship between the desire for frigid immersion and the appreciation of historical narratives has showcased the whimsical and unpredictable nature of online behavior. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9230482 and a p-value of less than 0.01 indicate a substantial and statistically significant relationship. This connection, akin to stumbling upon an ice-cold beverage on a hot summer day, has left us both surprised and delighted.

The findings of this study not only underscore the fascinating web of connections within the digital domain but also highlight the potential for serendipitous discoveries in the vast expanse of online data. The r-squared value of 0.8520180 further emphasizes the predictability of the likes garnered by historical educational videos based on trends in searches for cold water immersion techniques. It appears that, much like a captivating historical tale, the relationship between 'ice bath' searches and Extra History likes has kept us thoroughly engaged.

As we reflect on the results, it becomes clear that the world of online behavior is akin to a digital carnival, replete with unexpected twists and delightful surprises at every turn. However, delving further into this frosty relationship may not yield much more than a deeper appreciation for the unpredictable nature of online phenomena. It seems that, much like the mysteries of history itself, the peculiar connection between 'ice baths' and historical storytelling may remain enigmatic, teasing us with its inscrutable charm.

In light of these findings, it is our assertion that no further research is needed in this particular area. The chilling yet captivating relationship between Google searches for 'ice bath' and the total likes of Extra History YouTube videos will remain an intriguing enigma, adding a refreshing twist to the ever-evolving landscape of digital interactions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Chill-Vibes and Chills: Exploring the Frosty Relationship between Google Searches for 'Ice Bath' and Total Likes of Extra History YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Internet Trends and Cultural Phenomena


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Chill-Vibes and Chills: Exploring the Frosty Relationship between Google Searches for 'Ice Bath' and Total Likes of Extra History YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Cold Comfort Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Chill-Vibes and Chills: Exploring the Frosty Relationship between Google Searches for 'Ice Bath' and Total Likes of Extra History YouTube Videos with an abstract of This study delves into the frosty relationship between Google searches for 'ice bath' and total likes of the YouTube channel Extra History, known for its engaging historical content. Leveraging data from Google Trends and YouTube, we uncover a surprising correlation between the two seemingly disparate subjects. Our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.9230482 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2023. The findings uncover an intriguing link between the desire for icy immersion and the appreciation of historical narratives, shedding light on the whimsical and unexpected connections within the vast realm of online behavior.

ChatGPT:

Google searches, 'ice bath', Extra History YouTube, likes, correlation, Google Trends, YouTube data, historical content, online behavior.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Google searches for 'ice bath'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'ice bath' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'ice bath'

Total likes of Extra History YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total likes of Extra History YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Total likes of Extra History YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9230482 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8520180 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total likes of Extra History YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'ice bath') over the 12 years from 2012 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.9E-5. 0.0000186558395774301300000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 0.0019% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 53,603 random variables You don't actually need 53 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.74, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Google searches for 'ice bath' (Rel. search volume)17.166717.51919.916720.333320.916721.833323.523.7527.083338.333386.2
Total likes of Extra History YouTube videos (Total likes)13084807142401377990218880024945903254330320452030016202000210189522033586607911420




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([17.1667,17.5,19,19.9167,20.3333,20.9167,21.8333,23.5,23.75,27.0833,38.3333,86.2,])
array_2 = np.array([1308480,714240,1377990,2188800,2494590,3254330,3204520,3001620,2000210,1895220,3358660,7911420,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'ice bath'"
array_2_name = "Total likes of Extra History YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 4502 · Black Variable ID: 1408 · Red Variable ID: 25791
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0