Download png, svg
AI explanation
As more and more people attempted to construct their own flashy plasma swords, the demand for industrial-grade power sources skyrocketed. Unbeknownst to many, the preferred energy cells for these DIY lightsabers were actually repurposed corn-based biofuel cells, leading to a surge in corn production in Iowa. With fields of cornstalks stretching as far as the eye could see, it somehow led to a heightened pollen count in the area. This uptick in pollen aggravated the local allergies of certain Iowans, prompting them to stay indoors with their air purifiers running constantly. Little did they realize that this inadvertently decreased their overall outdoor carbon emissions, inadvertently contributing to cleaner air around them. The Force of cleaner air was indeed strong in this corn-laden scenario!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a high-tech scene featuring a sprawling cornfield in Iowa City. The rows of tall stalks should stretch into the distance, with golden sunlight filtering through the leaves. In this scene, people in the field are frantically searching on their phones for "how to build a lightsaber." Additionally, a faint haze looms over the city in the background, representing air pollution. Inside, a few allergy sufferers are seen surrounded by air purifiers, finding relief from the heightened pollen count. Capture the fusion of nature, technology, and urban environmental challenges in a visually captivating manner. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and Air pollution in Iowa City. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Minimalism Macabre High-tech Magic realism Steampunk
ChatGPT: High-tech
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and Air pollution in Iowa City, in the following situation: As more and more people attempted to construct their own flashy plasma swords, the demand for industrial-grade power sources skyrocketed. Unbeknownst to many, the preferred energy cells for these DIY lightsabers were actually repurposed corn-based biofuel cells, leading to a surge in corn production in Iowa. With fields of cornstalks stretching as far as the eye could see, it somehow led to a heightened pollen count in the area. This uptick in pollen aggravated the local allergies of certain Iowans, prompting them to stay indoors with their air purifiers running constantly. Little did they realize that this inadvertently decreased their overall outdoor carbon emissions, inadvertently contributing to cleaner air around them. The Force of cleaner air was indeed strong in this corn-laden scenario!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A sprawling cornfield in Iowa City, with rows of tall stalks stretching into the distance, is the focal point of this scene. The golden sunlight filters through the leaves as people in the field frantically search on their phones for "how to build a lightsaber." In the background, a faint haze looms over the city, representing the air pollution. Meanwhile, a few allergy sufferers are seen indoors, surrounded by air purifiers, finding relief from the heightened pollen count.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: A sprawling cornfield in Iowa City, with rows of tall stalks stretching into the distance, is the focal point of this scene. The golden sunlight filters through the leaves as people in the field frantically search on their phones for "how to build a lightsaber." In the background, a faint haze looms over the city, representing the air pollution. Meanwhile, a few allergy sufferers are seen indoors, surrounded by air purifiers, finding relief from the heightened pollen count. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a high-tech scene featuring a sprawling cornfield in Iowa City. The rows of tall stalks should stretch into the distance, with golden sunlight filtering through the leaves. In this scene, people in the field are frantically searching on their phones for "how to build a lightsaber." Additionally, a faint haze looms over the city in the background, representing air pollution. Inside, a few allergy sufferers are seen surrounded by air purifiers, finding relief from the heightened pollen count. Capture the fusion of nature, technology, and urban environmental challenges in a visually captivating manner.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in how to build a lightsaber (Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber') positively influenced Air pollution in Iowa City.
AI academic paper
Shedding Some Light on Lightsabers: Exploring the Correlation Between Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Iowa City The Journal of Extragalactic Engineering and Environmental Economics Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and Air pollution in Iowa City. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from Google Trends and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8188621 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2023.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Shedding Some Light on Lightsabers: Exploring the Correlation Between Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Iowa City
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between the popular Sci-Fi weapon, the lightsaber, and the less glamorous topic of air pollution in Iowa City. Using data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, we set out to answer the burning question: Can the lure of a Jedi's weapon wield Google searches on lightsaber construction that impact air quality in our earthly vicinity?
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8188621 and p < 0.01 between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and air pollution levels from 2004 to 2023 in Iowa City. This unexpected relationship sheds some light on the potential impact of Sci-Fi fandom on environmental concerns – a force, it seems, to be reckoned with.
Clearly, the Force is strong with this correlation, and while it's not a lightsaber, it's still worth giving a light chuckle, especially for the Star Wars enthusiasts among us. These results may lead to further inquiry into the noble mission of preserving air quality, albeit with a touch of galactic humor. So, remember, when it comes to Google searches and air pollution, the key is to always use the light side of the Force!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and Air pollution in Iowa City. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shedding Some Light on Lightsabers: Exploring the Correlation Between Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Iowa City
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between the popular Sci-Fi weapon, the lightsaber, and the less glamorous topic of air pollution in Iowa City. Using data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, we set out to answer the burning question: Can the lure of a Jedi's weapon wield Google searches on lightsaber construction that impact air quality in our earthly vicinity?
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8188621 and p < 0.01 between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and air pollution levels from 2004 to 2023 in Iowa City. This unexpected relationship sheds some light on the potential impact of Sci-Fi fandom on environmental concerns – a force, it seems, to be reckoned with.
Clearly, the Force is strong with this correlation, and while it's not a lightsaber, it's still worth giving a light chuckle, especially for the Star Wars enthusiasts among us. These results may lead to further inquiry into the noble mission of preserving air quality, albeit with a touch of galactic humor. So, remember, when it comes to Google searches and air pollution, the key is to always use the light side of the Force!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Gather around, fellow researchers, as we embark on a journey to explore the peculiar link between the futuristic fascination with lightsabers and the down-to-earth issue of air pollution in Iowa City. As we venture into this uncharted territory, it's only fitting to keep our minds as open as the vastness of the galaxy and maintain a sense of humor as sharp as a lightsaber's blade - after all, what's research without a good pun or two?
Before we delve into the rigorous statistical analysis, let's take a lighthearted detour and ponder this question: Why did Anakin Skywalker cross the road? To get to the Dark Side, of course! But in our case, we're more interested in how the intensive interest in lightsaber construction, as evidenced by Google searches, may shed light on the environmental dark side of air pollution in Iowa City.
Now, before you jump to conclusions faster than Han Solo navigating the Millennium Falcon through an asteroid field, let's remind ourselves of the gravity of both variables at play here. We understand that at first glance, the notion of a connection between lightsabers and air pollution may seem as unlikely as Wookiees playing chess - but fear not, for our findings may just defy your expectations faster than the Millennium Falcon did the laws of physics.
As we immerse ourselves in the realm of data analysis, let's also remember the wisdom of Master Yoda: "Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future." Indeed, the complex nature of human behavior and its impact on the environment is as mysterious as the Force itself. With that in mind, we set out to navigate the labyrinth of numbers and probabilities, all the while keeping our sense of wonder intact, recognizing that it's rare for research papers to come with their very own R2-D2 to provide comic relief.
It's time to dissect the findings that tantalize the curious mind and tickle the funny bone. Our scientific voyage into the unknown may just uncover a correlation as strong as the armor of a stormtrooper, and who knows, it might even spark a smile or two along the way. After all, when it comes to unearthing unexpected relationships, a little cosmic humor can make the journey infinitely more enjoyable.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and Air pollution in Iowa City. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shedding Some Light on Lightsabers: Exploring the Correlation Between Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Iowa City
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between the popular Sci-Fi weapon, the lightsaber, and the less glamorous topic of air pollution in Iowa City. Using data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, we set out to answer the burning question: Can the lure of a Jedi's weapon wield Google searches on lightsaber construction that impact air quality in our earthly vicinity?
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8188621 and p < 0.01 between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and air pollution levels from 2004 to 2023 in Iowa City. This unexpected relationship sheds some light on the potential impact of Sci-Fi fandom on environmental concerns – a force, it seems, to be reckoned with.
Clearly, the Force is strong with this correlation, and while it's not a lightsaber, it's still worth giving a light chuckle, especially for the Star Wars enthusiasts among us. These results may lead to further inquiry into the noble mission of preserving air quality, albeit with a touch of galactic humor. So, remember, when it comes to Google searches and air pollution, the key is to always use the light side of the Force!
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Gather around, fellow researchers, as we embark on a journey to explore the peculiar link between the futuristic fascination with lightsabers and the down-to-earth issue of air pollution in Iowa City. As we venture into this uncharted territory, it's only fitting to keep our minds as open as the vastness of the galaxy and maintain a sense of humor as sharp as a lightsaber's blade - after all, what's research without a good pun or two?
Before we delve into the rigorous statistical analysis, let's take a lighthearted detour and ponder this question: Why did Anakin Skywalker cross the road? To get to the Dark Side, of course! But in our case, we're more interested in how the intensive interest in lightsaber construction, as evidenced by Google searches, may shed light on the environmental dark side of air pollution in Iowa City.
Now, before you jump to conclusions faster than Han Solo navigating the Millennium Falcon through an asteroid field, let's remind ourselves of the gravity of both variables at play here. We understand that at first glance, the notion of a connection between lightsabers and air pollution may seem as unlikely as Wookiees playing chess - but fear not, for our findings may just defy your expectations faster than the Millennium Falcon did the laws of physics.
As we immerse ourselves in the realm of data analysis, let's also remember the wisdom of Master Yoda: "Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future." Indeed, the complex nature of human behavior and its impact on the environment is as mysterious as the Force itself. With that in mind, we set out to navigate the labyrinth of numbers and probabilities, all the while keeping our sense of wonder intact, recognizing that it's rare for research papers to come with their very own R2-D2 to provide comic relief.
It's time to dissect the findings that tantalize the curious mind and tickle the funny bone. Our scientific voyage into the unknown may just uncover a correlation as strong as the armor of a stormtrooper, and who knows, it might even spark a smile or two along the way. After all, when it comes to unearthing unexpected relationships, a little cosmic humor can make the journey infinitely more enjoyable.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The correlation between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long intrigued researchers in various fields. Smith et al. (2017) examined the interplay between popular culture and environmental awareness, shedding light on the unanticipated ways in which modern society interacts with ecological concerns. However, none of these studies could have foreseen the gravitational pull of lightsabers on Google search habits and its impact on air pollution in a particular Midwestern city.
In "The Intersection of Pop Culture and Climate Change," Doe (2019) delves into the influence of fictional narratives on public attitudes towards environmental issues, and yet, the allure of a Jedi's weapon may have remained in the shadows of such scholarly discourse.
It's like they say, when it comes to environmental research, it's important to think globally and act Yoda-ly.
On the more lighthearted side of non-fiction, "The Science of Star Wars" by Jeanne Cavelos and "How to Build a Lightsaber: And Other Star Wars Projects" by Bonnie Burton offer insights into the mythology and practicality of the iconic weapon. Though we must remember, when it comes to wielding a lightsaber, the key is to not lose sight of the forest moon for the trees.
Furthermore, the works of fiction such as "Jedi Twilight" by Michael Reaves and "Lords of the Sith" by Paul S. Kemp delve into the lore of lightsabers and the Force, hinting at a deeper connection between fiction and reality – or in this case, between Google searches and air pollution.
In a Twitter thread on the connection between sci-fi fandom and environmental consciousness, a user going by the handle @EcoWarriorGalactic stated, "Lightsabers may be fictional, but the enthusiasm they generate can spark real-world discussions about air quality and sustainability. May the Force (of Google searches) be with us in our quest for cleaner skies!"
And remember, when it comes to correlating Google searches for lightsaber construction and air pollution, it's essential to keep your sense of humor as sharp as a lightsaber!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and Air pollution in Iowa City. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 2004 to 2023
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shedding Some Light on Lightsabers: Exploring the Correlation Between Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Iowa City
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between the popular Sci-Fi weapon, the lightsaber, and the less glamorous topic of air pollution in Iowa City. Using data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, we set out to answer the burning question: Can the lure of a Jedi's weapon wield Google searches on lightsaber construction that impact air quality in our earthly vicinity?
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8188621 and p < 0.01 between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and air pollution levels from 2004 to 2023 in Iowa City. This unexpected relationship sheds some light on the potential impact of Sci-Fi fandom on environmental concerns – a force, it seems, to be reckoned with.
Clearly, the Force is strong with this correlation, and while it's not a lightsaber, it's still worth giving a light chuckle, especially for the Star Wars enthusiasts among us. These results may lead to further inquiry into the noble mission of preserving air quality, albeit with a touch of galactic humor. So, remember, when it comes to Google searches and air pollution, the key is to always use the light side of the Force!
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Gather around, fellow researchers, as we embark on a journey to explore the peculiar link between the futuristic fascination with lightsabers and the down-to-earth issue of air pollution in Iowa City. As we venture into this uncharted territory, it's only fitting to keep our minds as open as the vastness of the galaxy and maintain a sense of humor as sharp as a lightsaber's blade - after all, what's research without a good pun or two?
Before we delve into the rigorous statistical analysis, let's take a lighthearted detour and ponder this question: Why did Anakin Skywalker cross the road? To get to the Dark Side, of course! But in our case, we're more interested in how the intensive interest in lightsaber construction, as evidenced by Google searches, may shed light on the environmental dark side of air pollution in Iowa City.
Now, before you jump to conclusions faster than Han Solo navigating the Millennium Falcon through an asteroid field, let's remind ourselves of the gravity of both variables at play here. We understand that at first glance, the notion of a connection between lightsabers and air pollution may seem as unlikely as Wookiees playing chess - but fear not, for our findings may just defy your expectations faster than the Millennium Falcon did the laws of physics.
As we immerse ourselves in the realm of data analysis, let's also remember the wisdom of Master Yoda: "Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future." Indeed, the complex nature of human behavior and its impact on the environment is as mysterious as the Force itself. With that in mind, we set out to navigate the labyrinth of numbers and probabilities, all the while keeping our sense of wonder intact, recognizing that it's rare for research papers to come with their very own R2-D2 to provide comic relief.
It's time to dissect the findings that tantalize the curious mind and tickle the funny bone. Our scientific voyage into the unknown may just uncover a correlation as strong as the armor of a stormtrooper, and who knows, it might even spark a smile or two along the way. After all, when it comes to unearthing unexpected relationships, a little cosmic humor can make the journey infinitely more enjoyable.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To embark on this cosmic research endeavor, we compiled a dataset spanning 20 years, from 2004 to 2023 – a timeframe as extensive as the Star Wars saga itself, though with slightly less dramatic orchestral accompaniment. Our primary sources of data were Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, ensuring that our investigation remained firmly grounded in the digital realm and the terrestrial atmosphere, all while resisting the urge to break into a rousing rendition of the "Imperial March."
To wrangle the data, we utilized an arsenal of statistical methods as diverse as the species inhabiting the Mos Eisley Cantina. Firstly, we conducted a time-series analysis to track the fluctuations in Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' over the years, resembling a diligent droid meticulously scanning for hidden patterns. Then, to measure air pollution levels in Iowa City, we employed a robust set of air quality indices reminiscent of a Jedi's array of tools to track the purity of the Force.
With the datasets in hand, we ventured into the realm of correlation analysis, examining the connection between the frequency of lightsaber-related Google searches and air pollution levels. Our analysis employed intricate statistical techniques, dancing through the data with the agility of a lightsaber duel, ensuring that our findings were as reliable as the hyperdrive on the Millennium Falcon – much to the frustration of skeptical Imperial commanders.
Finally, we performed a comprehensive regression analysis to further dissect the intricate interplay between lightsaber inquiries and air pollution, seeking to uncover the underlying mechanisms driving this unexpected relationship. Our regression models were as meticulously crafted as a lightsaber hilt, aiming to illuminate the dark corners of this peculiar correlation with the precision of a Jedi Master guiding a young Padawan.
As we balanced the weight of scientific inquiry with the levity of cosmic humor, we remained mindful of the potential biases and confounding variables lurking in the depths of our dataset, much like hidden Sith Lords waiting to disrupt the balance. Our approach blended rigorous statistical methodologies with a hint of galactic whimsy, allowing us to unravel a correlation as captivating as Princess Leia's holographic distress signal, all while ensuring that data integrity remained as unwavering as a Jedi's resolve.
In summary, our methodology fused the precision of statistical analysis with the playful spirit of exploration, acknowledging that even in the realm of scientific inquiry, a touch of humor can be as illuminating as a glowing lightsaber in the depths of intergalactic darkness. With the Force – and perhaps a pun or two – on our side, we ventured forth, driven by a quest to uncover the unexpected, and ultimately shed light on the enigmatic relationship between lightsabers and air pollution in Iowa City.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and Air pollution in Iowa City. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Environmental Protection Agency .
For the time period 2004 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8188621, r-squared of 0.6705351, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shedding Some Light on Lightsabers: Exploring the Correlation Between Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Iowa City
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between the popular Sci-Fi weapon, the lightsaber, and the less glamorous topic of air pollution in Iowa City. Using data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, we set out to answer the burning question: Can the lure of a Jedi's weapon wield Google searches on lightsaber construction that impact air quality in our earthly vicinity?
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8188621 and p < 0.01 between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and air pollution levels from 2004 to 2023 in Iowa City. This unexpected relationship sheds some light on the potential impact of Sci-Fi fandom on environmental concerns – a force, it seems, to be reckoned with.
Clearly, the Force is strong with this correlation, and while it's not a lightsaber, it's still worth giving a light chuckle, especially for the Star Wars enthusiasts among us. These results may lead to further inquiry into the noble mission of preserving air quality, albeit with a touch of galactic humor. So, remember, when it comes to Google searches and air pollution, the key is to always use the light side of the Force!
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Gather around, fellow researchers, as we embark on a journey to explore the peculiar link between the futuristic fascination with lightsabers and the down-to-earth issue of air pollution in Iowa City. As we venture into this uncharted territory, it's only fitting to keep our minds as open as the vastness of the galaxy and maintain a sense of humor as sharp as a lightsaber's blade - after all, what's research without a good pun or two?
Before we delve into the rigorous statistical analysis, let's take a lighthearted detour and ponder this question: Why did Anakin Skywalker cross the road? To get to the Dark Side, of course! But in our case, we're more interested in how the intensive interest in lightsaber construction, as evidenced by Google searches, may shed light on the environmental dark side of air pollution in Iowa City.
Now, before you jump to conclusions faster than Han Solo navigating the Millennium Falcon through an asteroid field, let's remind ourselves of the gravity of both variables at play here. We understand that at first glance, the notion of a connection between lightsabers and air pollution may seem as unlikely as Wookiees playing chess - but fear not, for our findings may just defy your expectations faster than the Millennium Falcon did the laws of physics.
As we immerse ourselves in the realm of data analysis, let's also remember the wisdom of Master Yoda: "Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future." Indeed, the complex nature of human behavior and its impact on the environment is as mysterious as the Force itself. With that in mind, we set out to navigate the labyrinth of numbers and probabilities, all the while keeping our sense of wonder intact, recognizing that it's rare for research papers to come with their very own R2-D2 to provide comic relief.
It's time to dissect the findings that tantalize the curious mind and tickle the funny bone. Our scientific voyage into the unknown may just uncover a correlation as strong as the armor of a stormtrooper, and who knows, it might even spark a smile or two along the way. After all, when it comes to unearthing unexpected relationships, a little cosmic humor can make the journey infinitely more enjoyable.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis unveiled a remarkably strong correlation between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and air pollution levels in Iowa City from 2004 to 2023. The correlation coefficient of 0.8188621 highlights a compelling relationship between the two variables, emphasizing the impact of lightsaber curiosities on the local environmental quality. It appears that the Force, or rather, the search query, is indeed strong with this one!
Now, let's not jump into hyperspace just yet. There is still the matter of the r-squared value, which stood at 0.6705351. This statistic helps to further illuminate the extent to which changes in Google searches for lightsaber construction can account for variations in air pollution levels. It seems that even in the world of statistics, the Dark Side doesn't always have the upper hand!
In addition, the p-value, which clocked in at less than 0.01, has given us a resounding vote of confidence in the robustness of the observed relationship. It's safe to say that this correlation is as significant as the impact of a well-placed blaster shot in a galaxy far, far away.
Furthermore, our findings are succinctly captured in Fig. 1, where the scatterplot illustrates the tight clustering of data points, showcasing the unmistakable trend between the two variables. One might say that the connection is as clear as a hologram message from Princess Leia—no need to consult the Jedi archives for this one!
In conclusion, our results suggest that there is indeed a tangible link between the allure of lightsaber construction and the presence of air pollution in Iowa City. This discovery not only adds an unconventional dimension to the discourse on environmental influences but also underscores the potential of popular culture to leave a lasting impact on our earthly surroundings. In the battle against pollution, it seems that the Force, alongside a good dose of humor, may be our most powerful ally.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and Air pollution in Iowa City. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Shedding Some Light on Lightsabers: Exploring the Correlation Between Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Iowa City
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between the popular Sci-Fi weapon, the lightsaber, and the less glamorous topic of air pollution in Iowa City. Using data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, we set out to answer the burning question: Can the lure of a Jedi's weapon wield Google searches on lightsaber construction that impact air quality in our earthly vicinity?
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8188621 and p < 0.01 between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and air pollution levels from 2004 to 2023 in Iowa City. This unexpected relationship sheds some light on the potential impact of Sci-Fi fandom on environmental concerns – a force, it seems, to be reckoned with.
Clearly, the Force is strong with this correlation, and while it's not a lightsaber, it's still worth giving a light chuckle, especially for the Star Wars enthusiasts among us. These results may lead to further inquiry into the noble mission of preserving air quality, albeit with a touch of galactic humor. So, remember, when it comes to Google searches and air pollution, the key is to always use the light side of the Force!
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The correlation between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long intrigued researchers in various fields. Smith et al. (2017) examined the interplay between popular culture and environmental awareness, shedding light on the unanticipated ways in which modern society interacts with ecological concerns. However, none of these studies could have foreseen the gravitational pull of lightsabers on Google search habits and its impact on air pollution in a particular Midwestern city.
In "The Intersection of Pop Culture and Climate Change," Doe (2019) delves into the influence of fictional narratives on public attitudes towards environmental issues, and yet, the allure of a Jedi's weapon may have remained in the shadows of such scholarly discourse.
It's like they say, when it comes to environmental research, it's important to think globally and act Yoda-ly.
On the more lighthearted side of non-fiction, "The Science of Star Wars" by Jeanne Cavelos and "How to Build a Lightsaber: And Other Star Wars Projects" by Bonnie Burton offer insights into the mythology and practicality of the iconic weapon. Though we must remember, when it comes to wielding a lightsaber, the key is to not lose sight of the forest moon for the trees.
Furthermore, the works of fiction such as "Jedi Twilight" by Michael Reaves and "Lords of the Sith" by Paul S. Kemp delve into the lore of lightsabers and the Force, hinting at a deeper connection between fiction and reality – or in this case, between Google searches and air pollution.
In a Twitter thread on the connection between sci-fi fandom and environmental consciousness, a user going by the handle @EcoWarriorGalactic stated, "Lightsabers may be fictional, but the enthusiasm they generate can spark real-world discussions about air quality and sustainability. May the Force (of Google searches) be with us in our quest for cleaner skies!"
And remember, when it comes to correlating Google searches for lightsaber construction and air pollution, it's essential to keep your sense of humor as sharp as a lightsaber!
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis unveiled a remarkably strong correlation between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and air pollution levels in Iowa City from 2004 to 2023. The correlation coefficient of 0.8188621 highlights a compelling relationship between the two variables, emphasizing the impact of lightsaber curiosities on the local environmental quality. It appears that the Force, or rather, the search query, is indeed strong with this one!
Now, let's not jump into hyperspace just yet. There is still the matter of the r-squared value, which stood at 0.6705351. This statistic helps to further illuminate the extent to which changes in Google searches for lightsaber construction can account for variations in air pollution levels. It seems that even in the world of statistics, the Dark Side doesn't always have the upper hand!
In addition, the p-value, which clocked in at less than 0.01, has given us a resounding vote of confidence in the robustness of the observed relationship. It's safe to say that this correlation is as significant as the impact of a well-placed blaster shot in a galaxy far, far away.
Furthermore, our findings are succinctly captured in Fig. 1, where the scatterplot illustrates the tight clustering of data points, showcasing the unmistakable trend between the two variables. One might say that the connection is as clear as a hologram message from Princess Leia—no need to consult the Jedi archives for this one!
In conclusion, our results suggest that there is indeed a tangible link between the allure of lightsaber construction and the presence of air pollution in Iowa City. This discovery not only adds an unconventional dimension to the discourse on environmental influences but also underscores the potential of popular culture to leave a lasting impact on our earthly surroundings. In the battle against pollution, it seems that the Force, alongside a good dose of humor, may be our most powerful ally.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The results of our investigation have uncovered a connection between the captivating quest to learn how to build a lightsaber and the air pollution levels in Iowa City, shining a light on the potential influence of popular culture on environmental concerns. Our findings provide empirical support for the previously overlooked gravitational force of lightsaber-related Google searches on local air quality.
Much like how a Jedi uses the Force to guide and protect, our statistical analysis has illuminated a strong correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. The correlation coefficient of 0.8188621 certainly reveals a compelling relationship, suggesting that the allure of lightsabers may not be as fictional as one might think. It's almost as if Yoda himself would say, "Strong, the correlation is."
When we consider the broad implications of this discovery, we are reminded of the quote, "The Force will be with you, always." In this case, it seems the Force of funny search queries and environmental impact indeed remains strong.
As we joyfully dig into the statistical details, it's worth highlighting the p-value, which garnered resounding support for the robustness of the observed relationship. With a value of less than 0.01, it's as clear as a crystal in a lightsaber's hilt that this correlation is indeed significant. It's almost like the universe itself is saying, "This is the correlation you're looking for."
Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.6705351 offers further insight into the extent to which changes in the Google searches for lightsaber construction can explain variations in air pollution levels. It's as if the lightsaber of statistical analysis has sliced through the confusion, revealing the extent of the connection in a way that even a Sith lord couldn't dismiss.
In encapsulating these findings, we cannot help but be reminded of the timeless wisdom provided by the Star Wars mythos – "Search your feelings, you know it to be true." The relationship between lightsaber-related Google searches and air pollution in Iowa City may seem unexpected, but it's now a part of the empirical record.
In the grand scope of scientific research, it's essential to remain attuned to unanticipated connections and be open to embracing the unexpected. After all, as we've witnessed in this study, sometimes the most remarkable correlations are found where we least expect them. And for that, may the farce – ahem, Force – be with us as we continue our scientific explorations, one chuckle-worthy correlation at a time.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and Air pollution in Iowa City. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Shedding Some Light on Lightsabers: Exploring the Correlation Between Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Iowa City
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between the popular Sci-Fi weapon, the lightsaber, and the less glamorous topic of air pollution in Iowa City. Using data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, we set out to answer the burning question: Can the lure of a Jedi's weapon wield Google searches on lightsaber construction that impact air quality in our earthly vicinity?
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8188621 and p < 0.01 between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and air pollution levels from 2004 to 2023 in Iowa City. This unexpected relationship sheds some light on the potential impact of Sci-Fi fandom on environmental concerns – a force, it seems, to be reckoned with.
Clearly, the Force is strong with this correlation, and while it's not a lightsaber, it's still worth giving a light chuckle, especially for the Star Wars enthusiasts among us. These results may lead to further inquiry into the noble mission of preserving air quality, albeit with a touch of galactic humor. So, remember, when it comes to Google searches and air pollution, the key is to always use the light side of the Force!
[[INTRDUCTION]]
Gather around, fellow researchers, as we embark on a journey to explore the peculiar link between the futuristic fascination with lightsabers and the down-to-earth issue of air pollution in Iowa City. As we venture into this uncharted territory, it's only fitting to keep our minds as open as the vastness of the galaxy and maintain a sense of humor as sharp as a lightsaber's blade - after all, what's research without a good pun or two?
Before we delve into the rigorous statistical analysis, let's take a lighthearted detour and ponder this question: Why did Anakin Skywalker cross the road? To get to the Dark Side, of course! But in our case, we're more interested in how the intensive interest in lightsaber construction, as evidenced by Google searches, may shed light on the environmental dark side of air pollution in Iowa City.
Now, before you jump to conclusions faster than Han Solo navigating the Millennium Falcon through an asteroid field, let's remind ourselves of the gravity of both variables at play here. We understand that at first glance, the notion of a connection between lightsabers and air pollution may seem as unlikely as Wookiees playing chess - but fear not, for our findings may just defy your expectations faster than the Millennium Falcon did the laws of physics.
As we immerse ourselves in the realm of data analysis, let's also remember the wisdom of Master Yoda: "Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future." Indeed, the complex nature of human behavior and its impact on the environment is as mysterious as the Force itself. With that in mind, we set out to navigate the labyrinth of numbers and probabilities, all the while keeping our sense of wonder intact, recognizing that it's rare for research papers to come with their very own R2-D2 to provide comic relief.
It's time to dissect the findings that tantalize the curious mind and tickle the funny bone. Our scientific voyage into the unknown may just uncover a correlation as strong as the armor of a stormtrooper, and who knows, it might even spark a smile or two along the way. After all, when it comes to unearthing unexpected relationships, a little cosmic humor can make the journey infinitely more enjoyable.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis unveiled a remarkably strong correlation between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and air pollution levels in Iowa City from 2004 to 2023. The correlation coefficient of 0.8188621 highlights a compelling relationship between the two variables, emphasizing the impact of lightsaber curiosities on the local environmental quality. It appears that the Force, or rather, the search query, is indeed strong with this one!
Now, let's not jump into hyperspace just yet. There is still the matter of the r-squared value, which stood at 0.6705351. This statistic helps to further illuminate the extent to which changes in Google searches for lightsaber construction can account for variations in air pollution levels. It seems that even in the world of statistics, the Dark Side doesn't always have the upper hand!
In addition, the p-value, which clocked in at less than 0.01, has given us a resounding vote of confidence in the robustness of the observed relationship. It's safe to say that this correlation is as significant as the impact of a well-placed blaster shot in a galaxy far, far away.
Furthermore, our findings are succinctly captured in Fig. 1, where the scatterplot illustrates the tight clustering of data points, showcasing the unmistakable trend between the two variables. One might say that the connection is as clear as a hologram message from Princess Leia—no need to consult the Jedi archives for this one!
In conclusion, our results suggest that there is indeed a tangible link between the allure of lightsaber construction and the presence of air pollution in Iowa City. This discovery not only adds an unconventional dimension to the discourse on environmental influences but also underscores the potential of popular culture to leave a lasting impact on our earthly surroundings. In the battle against pollution, it seems that the Force, alongside a good dose of humor, may be our most powerful ally.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In the words of Obi-Wan Kenobi, "Your eyes can deceive you. Don't trust them." However, in this case, trust the statistics, because they've revealed a correlation as strong as the bond between C-3PO and R2-D2. Our research has clearly shown that Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and air pollution in Iowa City are as connected as Luke Skywalker's hand and a robotic one!
We've discovered a correlation coefficient as impressive as Chewbacca's roar, pointing to a tangible link between sci-fi curiosity and air quality concerns. The r-squared value proved to be as reliable as the Millennium Falcon's hyperdrive, shedding light on the extent to which lightsaber inquiries can account for changes in pollution levels. And hey, the p-value was as low as the odds of successfully navigating an asteroid field – this relationship is no fluke!
Our scatterplot, akin to a galactic map, beautifully illustrates the tight relationship between the variables. No need to channel the Force to comprehend this connection; it's as clear as day. The results of this study leave us with more than just data – they leave us with a newfound appreciation for the influence of popular culture on our environment.
In conclusion, our research has definitively proven that the Force is strong with this correlation. With that said, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, as we've undoubtedly illuminated the impact of lightsaber intrigue on environmental quality. May the research be with you!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Shedding Some Light on Lightsabers: Exploring the Correlation Between Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Iowa City. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Extragalactic Engineering and Environmental Economics
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Shedding Some Light on Lightsabers: Exploring the Correlation Between Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Iowa City. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Intergalactic Science Consortium
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Shedding Some Light on Lightsabers: Exploring the Correlation Between Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Iowa City with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between the popular Sci-Fi weapon, the lightsaber, and the less glamorous topic of air pollution in Iowa City. Using data from Google Trends and the Environmental Protection Agency, we set out to answer the burning question: Can the lure of a Jedi's weapon wield Google searches on lightsaber construction that impact air quality in our earthly vicinity?
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8188621 and p < 0.01 between Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' and air pollution levels from 2004 to 2023 in Iowa City. This unexpected relationship sheds some light on the potential impact of Sci-Fi fandom on environmental concerns – a force, it seems, to be reckoned with.
Clearly, the Force is strong with this correlation, and while it's not a lightsaber, it's still worth giving a light chuckle, especially for the Star Wars enthusiasts among us. These results may lead to further inquiry into the noble mission of preserving air quality, albeit with a touch of galactic humor. So, remember, when it comes to Google searches and air pollution, the key is to always use the light side of the Force!
ChatGPT:
lightsaber construction, Google searches, air pollution, Iowa City, correlation, Sci-Fi fandom, environmental impact, Google Trends, Environmental Protection Agency, Jedi weapon, Star Wars enthusiasts, air quality preservation
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber'Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber'
Air pollution in Iowa City
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Iowa City, IA
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Iowa City
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.6705351 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 67.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Iowa City) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber') over the 20 years from 2004 through 2023.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.01E-5. 0.0000101206827891140980000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 0.00101% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 98,808 random variables You don't actually need 98 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.59, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | |
Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' (Rel. search volume) | 5.91667 | 22.9167 | 4.75 | 4.08333 | 4.33333 | 3.83333 | 4.25 | 2.5 | 1.83333 | 1.91667 | 1.83333 | 3 | 2.41667 | 1.3 | 1.11111 | 2.36364 | 3.16667 | 2.33333 | 2.91667 | 1.88889 |
Air pollution in Iowa City (Bad air quality days) | 2.45902 | 4.09836 | 0.833333 | 1.50602 | 0.574713 | 0.561798 | 1.09589 | 0 | 0 | 0.273973 | 0.274725 | 0.273973 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.276243 | 0.549451 | 0.273973 | 2.1978 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data.
In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.
For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.
(This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([5.91667,22.9167,4.75,4.08333,4.33333,3.83333,4.25,2.5,1.83333,1.91667,1.83333,3,2.41667,1.3,1.11111,2.36364,3.16667,2.33333,2.91667,1.88889,])
array_2 = np.array([2.45902,4.09836,0.833333,1.50602,0.574713,0.561798,1.09589,0,0,0.273973,0.274725,0.273973,0,0,0,0,0.276243,0.549451,0.273973,2.1978,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber'"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Iowa City"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber'
- Line chart for only Air pollution in Iowa City
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Shedding Some Light on Lightsabers: Exploring the Correlation Between Google Searches for 'How to Build a Lightsaber' and Air Pollution in Iowa City
You're a rater extraordinaire!
Correlation ID: 4494 · Black Variable ID: 1521 · Red Variable ID: 20741