about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,467 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is American cheese consumption and the second variable is Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As American cheese consumption increased, so did the level of cheesiness in political ads. This cheesiness resonated with voters in Pennsylvania, leading to more support for the Republican candidate. Remember, for some voters, it's all about the gouda old American values!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate a photorealistic image of a TV screen broadcasting a political ad. The ad depicts a person enthusiastically biting into a cheeseburger with American cheese oozing out. As the ad plays, the scene transitions to a map of Pennsylvania. On the map, visualize the Republican candidate's votes steadily increasing alongside the transformation of American cheese slices into cheesy campaign slogans. The focus should be on creating a detailed and realistic depiction of the ad and the map, capturing the visual elements without any textual representation. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Surrealism Cute cartoon Photorealism Minimalism Steampunk
ChatGPT: Photorealism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania, in the following situation: As American cheese consumption increased, so did the level of cheesiness in political ads. This cheesiness resonated with voters in Pennsylvania, leading to more support for the Republican candidate. Remember, for some voters, it's all about the gouda old American values!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Picture a TV screen with a political ad playing, showing a person taking a big bite of a cheeseburger with American cheese oozing out. As the ad plays, the cheese consumption in the state increases. Cut to a map of Pennsylvania, where the Republican candidate's votes steadily rise alongside a visual representation of American cheese slices transforming into cheesy campaign slogans.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Photorealism ] and depicting this scene: Picture a TV screen with a political ad playing, showing a person taking a big bite of a cheeseburger with American cheese oozing out. As the ad plays, the cheese consumption in the state increases. Cut to a map of Pennsylvania, where the Republican candidate's votes steadily rise alongside a visual representation of American cheese slices transforming into cheesy campaign slogans. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate a photorealistic image of a TV screen broadcasting a political ad. The ad depicts a person enthusiastically biting into a cheeseburger with American cheese oozing out. As the ad plays, the scene transitions to a map of Pennsylvania. On the map, visualize the Republican candidate's votes steadily increasing alongside the transformation of American cheese slices into cheesy campaign slogans. The focus should be on creating a detailed and realistic depiction of the ad and the map, capturing the visual elements without any textual representation.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in American cheese consumption caused Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Big and the Cheesy: A Gouda Look at American Cheese Consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Pennsylvania

Journal of Dairy Politics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9485207 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Big and the Cheesy: A Gouda Look at American Cheese Consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the findings of our delightfully cheesy academic pursuit to unravel the correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. Utilizing data from the USDA and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, we embarked on a grand fromage exploration to answer this perplexing question. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9485207 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. We gratefully present our findings with a slice of humor, a sprinkle of curiosity, and a dash of cheddar. Let's delve into the world of cheese and politics, where even the sharpest of minds are left pondering the dairy elections!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Big and the Cheesy: A Gouda Look at American Cheese Consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the findings of our delightfully cheesy academic pursuit to unravel the correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. Utilizing data from the USDA and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, we embarked on a grand fromage exploration to answer this perplexing question. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9485207 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. We gratefully present our findings with a slice of humor, a sprinkle of curiosity, and a dash of cheddar. Let's delve into the world of cheese and politics, where even the sharpest of minds are left pondering the dairy elections!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

The relationship between cheese consumption and political preferences has been a topic of humorous speculation and cheesy jokes for years. In the realm of Pennsylvania politics, where "whiz wit" can refer to both a type of cheesesteak and the state's political climate, we decided to embark on a rather unconventional quest to decipher the potential correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate.

This peculiar culinary-political journey led us to delve into data from the USDA and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, to analyze American cheese consumption and voting patterns in the Keystone State. Our exploration took us on a whirlwind of dairy-laden statistical analyses and political whimsy, and what we uncovered will surely leave our readers both amused and bemused.

As much as we'd like to say we approached this research with the utmost "provolone" attitude, the truth is that our methods were rigorous, our analysis was thorough, and our findings are "grate" significance to the realm of voter behavior and dairy consumption trends.

So grab a slice of your favorite cheddar, get comfortable, and let's embark on this Gouda-darn cheesy journey through the realm of American cheese consumption and its association with voting for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. It's a tale "brie-lliantly" bizarre and "feta-stically" intriguing, and we promise not to "whey-st" your time with any more dairy puns... okay, maybe just a few more.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Big and the Cheesy: A Gouda Look at American Cheese Consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the findings of our delightfully cheesy academic pursuit to unravel the correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. Utilizing data from the USDA and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, we embarked on a grand fromage exploration to answer this perplexing question. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9485207 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. We gratefully present our findings with a slice of humor, a sprinkle of curiosity, and a dash of cheddar. Let's delve into the world of cheese and politics, where even the sharpest of minds are left pondering the dairy elections!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The relationship between cheese consumption and political preferences has been a topic of humorous speculation and cheesy jokes for years. In the realm of Pennsylvania politics, where "whiz wit" can refer to both a type of cheesesteak and the state's political climate, we decided to embark on a rather unconventional quest to decipher the potential correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate.
This peculiar culinary-political journey led us to delve into data from the USDA and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, to analyze American cheese consumption and voting patterns in the Keystone State. Our exploration took us on a whirlwind of dairy-laden statistical analyses and political whimsy, and what we uncovered will surely leave our readers both amused and bemused.
As much as we'd like to say we approached this research with the utmost "provolone" attitude, the truth is that our methods were rigorous, our analysis was thorough, and our findings are "grate" significance to the realm of voter behavior and dairy consumption trends.
So grab a slice of your favorite cheddar, get comfortable, and let's embark on this Gouda-darn cheesy journey through the realm of American cheese consumption and its association with voting for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. It's a tale "brie-lliantly" bizarre and "feta-stically" intriguing, and we promise not to "whey-st" your time with any more dairy puns... okay, maybe just a few more.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The scholarly exploration of the relationship between American cheese consumption and political inclinations has often been as convoluted and perplexing as trying to separate two slices of melted Swiss. Smith et al. (2010) delved into the dietary habits of American households and their potential impacts on decision-making processes, while Doe (2015) expounded upon the psychological underpinnings of comfort foods and their influence on political ideology. The culmination of these investigations posited a hitherto unexplored nexus between cheese-laden comestibles and electoral preferences.

However, as much as we'd like to maintain an air of scholarly seriousness, there's no avoiding the "pun-damental" truth that the topic of cheese and politics is ripe for a platter of puns and a dollop of whimsy. In "Cheese: A Cultural History," the authors delve into the multifaceted nature of cheese as a consumable and its role in shaping societal customs and attitudes. This tome provides a "gouda" starting point for understanding the cultural significance of cheese and its potential impact on voting behavior.

Amidst these serious academic pursuits, one cannot overlook the fictional realm's contribution to our understanding of cheese and its potential influence on political preferences. Consider the allegorical significance of cheese in George Orwell's "Animal Farm," where the quest for power and control is symbolized by the cunning allocation of the eponymous dairy product. Similarly, the whimsical world of Roald Dahl's "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" presents a nuanced portrayal of gluttony and excess, albeit with a focus on confectionery rather than cheese. One could argue that the underlying themes of opulence and indulgence hold some relevance to the ostentatious allure of American cheese and its connection to the political landscape.

On a more cinematic note, movies such as "Nacho Libre" and "Cheese: The Eddy Limburger Story" offer a tangential exploration of the cultural and societal implications of cheese consumption. While these films may not directly relate to the correlation between American cheese consumption and voting patterns, they do provide a comical backdrop against which the multifaceted nature of cheese can be appreciated. After all, who can resist a good cheese-themed movie in the midst of rigorous academic pursuits?

As we navigate through this literature review, it becomes increasingly apparent that the cheesy landscape of American politics is rife with potential correlations, unexplored pun-derlands, and a labyrinth of possibilities. So, grab your favorite cheese wheel, sprinkle some Parmesan on your thoughts, and let's embark on this "brie-lliant" journey through the captivating world of fromage and its mysterious influence on the political palette.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1990 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Big and the Cheesy: A Gouda Look at American Cheese Consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the findings of our delightfully cheesy academic pursuit to unravel the correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. Utilizing data from the USDA and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, we embarked on a grand fromage exploration to answer this perplexing question. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9485207 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. We gratefully present our findings with a slice of humor, a sprinkle of curiosity, and a dash of cheddar. Let's delve into the world of cheese and politics, where even the sharpest of minds are left pondering the dairy elections!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The relationship between cheese consumption and political preferences has been a topic of humorous speculation and cheesy jokes for years. In the realm of Pennsylvania politics, where "whiz wit" can refer to both a type of cheesesteak and the state's political climate, we decided to embark on a rather unconventional quest to decipher the potential correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate.
This peculiar culinary-political journey led us to delve into data from the USDA and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, to analyze American cheese consumption and voting patterns in the Keystone State. Our exploration took us on a whirlwind of dairy-laden statistical analyses and political whimsy, and what we uncovered will surely leave our readers both amused and bemused.
As much as we'd like to say we approached this research with the utmost "provolone" attitude, the truth is that our methods were rigorous, our analysis was thorough, and our findings are "grate" significance to the realm of voter behavior and dairy consumption trends.
So grab a slice of your favorite cheddar, get comfortable, and let's embark on this Gouda-darn cheesy journey through the realm of American cheese consumption and its association with voting for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. It's a tale "brie-lliantly" bizarre and "feta-stically" intriguing, and we promise not to "whey-st" your time with any more dairy puns... okay, maybe just a few more.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the delectably mysterious relationship between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania, we concocted a methodological blend that was equal parts sophisticated statistical analysis and whimsical cheese metaphors. Our approach was not unlike the crafting of a fine cheese platter - a delicate balance of art and science, with a hint of playful irreverence.

Data Collection:
We sourced our data from a variety of repositories, primarily relying on the detailed information provided by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab. In addition, we delved into the dairy-rich databases of the Harvard Dataverse to gather comprehensive data on American cheese consumption patterns and electoral outcomes in Pennsylvania from 1990 to 2020.

Cheesy Statistical Analysis:
Our first step in this deliciously ambitious endeavor was to quantify American cheese consumption using per capita consumption as reported by the USDA. To mirror the subtle nuances of cheese, we utilized advanced statistical techniques, including time-series analysis and regression modeling, to explore patterns in cheese consumption and voting behavior. We employed sophisticated econometric approaches to account for potential confounding factors, ensuring our analysis stood up to the scrutiny of the sharpest cheddar critics.

Cross-Referencing with Voting Data:
In parallel, we corralled detailed voting tallies from each presidential election in Pennsylvania during the study period, cross-referencing these results with the delectably cheesy consumption patterns. Our examination encompassed not only the total Republican votes but also the relative proportions of votes garnered by the Republican presidential candidate, offering a comprehensive evaluation of electoral preferences amid the aromatic allure of American cheese.

Correlation Analysis:
With our data sets in hand, we embarked on a statistical journey akin to slicing through a block of aged cheddar - methodically peeling back layers of complexity. Employing correlation analysis, we scrutinized the intertwining relationships between American cheese consumption and Republican votes, determined to decipher whether the cheese and conservative ballots were as intertwined as mozzarella on a pizza.

Rigorous Sensitivity Analysis:
As any connoisseur of fine cheese knows, the subtleties of flavor can be influenced by a myriad of factors. In a similar vein, our methodology incorporated a rigorous sensitivity analysis to gauge the robustness of our findings. We probed the impact of varying time frames, election cycles, and potential outliers, ensuring our conclusions were as stable as a well-aged wheel of Parmigiano-Reggiano.

Qualitative Examination:
To elevate our analysis beyond mere numbers and percentages, we engaged in qualitative examination, seeking to capture the essence of the cheese-voting dynamic. This involved an in-depth exploration of historical and socio-political factors impacting Pennsylvania, integrating delightful anecdotes and quirky discoveries into our scholarly pursuit.

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval:
Before commencing our quirky odyssey, we secured approval from the fictional but flamboyantly named “Ethical Evaluation of Edible Excursions” (EEEET) Institutional Review Board, ensuring our research upheld the highest ethical standards in both academia and gastronomic inquiry.

Overall, our methodological approach was designed to savor the flavors of sophisticated analysis, all while embracing the playfulness inherent in examining the peculiar nexus of American cheese consumption and political leanings. As we present our findings, we invite readers to partake in this peculiarly delightful pairing of academia and humor, where even the most studious of endeavors can be seasoned with a hint of whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1990 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9485207, r-squared of 0.8996916, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Big and the Cheesy: A Gouda Look at American Cheese Consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the findings of our delightfully cheesy academic pursuit to unravel the correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. Utilizing data from the USDA and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, we embarked on a grand fromage exploration to answer this perplexing question. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9485207 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. We gratefully present our findings with a slice of humor, a sprinkle of curiosity, and a dash of cheddar. Let's delve into the world of cheese and politics, where even the sharpest of minds are left pondering the dairy elections!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
The relationship between cheese consumption and political preferences has been a topic of humorous speculation and cheesy jokes for years. In the realm of Pennsylvania politics, where "whiz wit" can refer to both a type of cheesesteak and the state's political climate, we decided to embark on a rather unconventional quest to decipher the potential correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate.
This peculiar culinary-political journey led us to delve into data from the USDA and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, to analyze American cheese consumption and voting patterns in the Keystone State. Our exploration took us on a whirlwind of dairy-laden statistical analyses and political whimsy, and what we uncovered will surely leave our readers both amused and bemused.
As much as we'd like to say we approached this research with the utmost "provolone" attitude, the truth is that our methods were rigorous, our analysis was thorough, and our findings are "grate" significance to the realm of voter behavior and dairy consumption trends.
So grab a slice of your favorite cheddar, get comfortable, and let's embark on this Gouda-darn cheesy journey through the realm of American cheese consumption and its association with voting for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. It's a tale "brie-lliantly" bizarre and "feta-stically" intriguing, and we promise not to "whey-st" your time with any more dairy puns... okay, maybe just a few more.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our unorthodox investigation into the relationship between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania yielded some truly titillating findings. After plenty of number-crunching and a whole lot of cheesy jokes to keep our spirits high, we uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9485207 between these two seemingly unrelated variables for the years 1990 to 2020. The r-squared value of 0.8996916 further validated the robustness of the relationship we discovered. And with a p-value less than 0.01, we can confidently say that the likelihood of this correlation occurring by chance is about as slim as a sliver of Parmesan.

Figure 1 illustrates the strikingly close relationship between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. The scatterplot speaks volumes; it clearly shows a positively sloping cloud of data points, reminiscent of the hilly landscapes of the Keystone State, where cheese and politics seem to have formed a remarkably strong partnership over the years.

Now, to put all this statistical jargon into simpler terms: the more American cheese Pennsylvanians consumed, the more likely they were to cast their votes for the Republican presidential candidate. This correlation is so strong that one might even say that cheese has been a "wheely" influential factor in Pennsylvania elections.

As we bask in the warm glow of our findings, we must also acknowledge the limits of our study. While our data analysis revealed a striking relationship, we cannot claim causation. Cheese may have its way of wooing voters, but we dare not jump to any "brie-lliant" conclusions just yet. It's a fine line between correlation and "halloumi"-nation, after all.

We hope our research has provided food for thought and perhaps a chuckle or two. As we conclude this section, we invite our readers to ponder the cheesy mysteries of voter behavior and dairy delights. And who knows, with further research, we may soon uncover the true cheesy motivations behind political preferences. Stay tuned for more cheesy adventures in the world of academia!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Big and the Cheesy: A Gouda Look at American Cheese Consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the findings of our delightfully cheesy academic pursuit to unravel the correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. Utilizing data from the USDA and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, we embarked on a grand fromage exploration to answer this perplexing question. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9485207 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. We gratefully present our findings with a slice of humor, a sprinkle of curiosity, and a dash of cheddar. Let's delve into the world of cheese and politics, where even the sharpest of minds are left pondering the dairy elections!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The scholarly exploration of the relationship between American cheese consumption and political inclinations has often been as convoluted and perplexing as trying to separate two slices of melted Swiss. Smith et al. (2010) delved into the dietary habits of American households and their potential impacts on decision-making processes, while Doe (2015) expounded upon the psychological underpinnings of comfort foods and their influence on political ideology. The culmination of these investigations posited a hitherto unexplored nexus between cheese-laden comestibles and electoral preferences.
However, as much as we'd like to maintain an air of scholarly seriousness, there's no avoiding the "pun-damental" truth that the topic of cheese and politics is ripe for a platter of puns and a dollop of whimsy. In "Cheese: A Cultural History," the authors delve into the multifaceted nature of cheese as a consumable and its role in shaping societal customs and attitudes. This tome provides a "gouda" starting point for understanding the cultural significance of cheese and its potential impact on voting behavior.
Amidst these serious academic pursuits, one cannot overlook the fictional realm's contribution to our understanding of cheese and its potential influence on political preferences. Consider the allegorical significance of cheese in George Orwell's "Animal Farm," where the quest for power and control is symbolized by the cunning allocation of the eponymous dairy product. Similarly, the whimsical world of Roald Dahl's "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" presents a nuanced portrayal of gluttony and excess, albeit with a focus on confectionery rather than cheese. One could argue that the underlying themes of opulence and indulgence hold some relevance to the ostentatious allure of American cheese and its connection to the political landscape.
On a more cinematic note, movies such as "Nacho Libre" and "Cheese: The Eddy Limburger Story" offer a tangential exploration of the cultural and societal implications of cheese consumption. While these films may not directly relate to the correlation between American cheese consumption and voting patterns, they do provide a comical backdrop against which the multifaceted nature of cheese can be appreciated. After all, who can resist a good cheese-themed movie in the midst of rigorous academic pursuits?
As we navigate through this literature review, it becomes increasingly apparent that the cheesy landscape of American politics is rife with potential correlations, unexplored pun-derlands, and a labyrinth of possibilities. So, grab your favorite cheese wheel, sprinkle some Parmesan on your thoughts, and let's embark on this "brie-lliant" journey through the captivating world of fromage and its mysterious influence on the political palette.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our unorthodox investigation into the relationship between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania yielded some truly titillating findings. After plenty of number-crunching and a whole lot of cheesy jokes to keep our spirits high, we uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9485207 between these two seemingly unrelated variables for the years 1990 to 2020. The r-squared value of 0.8996916 further validated the robustness of the relationship we discovered. And with a p-value less than 0.01, we can confidently say that the likelihood of this correlation occurring by chance is about as slim as a sliver of Parmesan.
Figure 1 illustrates the strikingly close relationship between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. The scatterplot speaks volumes; it clearly shows a positively sloping cloud of data points, reminiscent of the hilly landscapes of the Keystone State, where cheese and politics seem to have formed a remarkably strong partnership over the years.
Now, to put all this statistical jargon into simpler terms: the more American cheese Pennsylvanians consumed, the more likely they were to cast their votes for the Republican presidential candidate. This correlation is so strong that one might even say that cheese has been a "wheely" influential factor in Pennsylvania elections.
As we bask in the warm glow of our findings, we must also acknowledge the limits of our study. While our data analysis revealed a striking relationship, we cannot claim causation. Cheese may have its way of wooing voters, but we dare not jump to any "brie-lliant" conclusions just yet. It's a fine line between correlation and "halloumi"-nation, after all.
We hope our research has provided food for thought and perhaps a chuckle or two. As we conclude this section, we invite our readers to ponder the cheesy mysteries of voter behavior and dairy delights. And who knows, with further research, we may soon uncover the true cheesy motivations behind political preferences. Stay tuned for more cheesy adventures in the world of academia!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The "wheely" curious findings of our investigation point to a strong association between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania, confirming the "grate" potential of cheese as a political influencer. In delving into the literature review, we reveled in the "cheesy" pun-damental truth that the connection between cheese and politics is not just a figment of our imagination but a rind of reality. Smith et al. (2010) and Doe (2015) paved the whey for our exploration, and the correlations they hinted at have been wedged into the spotlight by our study's un-brie-lievable results.

Our findings aligned with the scholarly undertakings, illuminating the tantalizing potential that cheese could mold electoral preferences. Just as George Orwell's "Animal Farm" allegorically cheddar-ed a light on power dynamics, so did our statistical evidence hint at the deliciously savory influence of American cheese on Republican votes in Pennsylvania. It appears that the delicious allure of American cheese has gruyère-d itself into the hearts of Pennsylvania voters, swaying them toward the Republican candidate. "Brie-lliant"-ly, our results have gorgonzola-d the limelight to the hitherto unexplored nexus between cheese-laden comestibles and political inclinations.

Now, we mustn't leap to "halloumi"-nation and assume causation. While our data speaks volumes about the strong correlation, we must resist the temptation to hastily conclude that American cheese consumption directly dictates voting preferences. As the old adage goes, "correlation does not imply causation." Nonetheless, our findings undeniably highlight the "cheddar" nuances of voter behavior and raise some "emmental" questions about the subtle influencers in political choices.

It's not just a "mozza"-nificent coincidence that American cheese and political preferences have intertwined like the tendrils of a vine. Through our study, we've witnessed the "feta"-stical power of cheese in shaping the political palette of a state known for its rolling hills and cheese-loving populace. With this "grate" revelation, we shed light on the tantalizing potential of food as a silent persuader in the realm of democratic decision-making.

As we embark on further research, we remain discerning in our approach, cautiously stepping through the "whey" of data and statistics to avoid getting lost in the "brie-muda triangle" of assumptions. The cheese may have led us to tantalizing correlations, but the "gouda" pursuit of academic inquiry necessitates a cautious and methodical exploration of the true underpinnings of these peculiar findings. So, as we conclude this discussion, we invite further scholarly scrutiny into the "grate" mystery of cheese and its potential impact on political preferences. After all, in the world of academic pursuits, no topic is too "gorgonzola" to warrant investigation!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between American cheese consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Big and the Cheesy: A Gouda Look at American Cheese Consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the findings of our delightfully cheesy academic pursuit to unravel the correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. Utilizing data from the USDA and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, we embarked on a grand fromage exploration to answer this perplexing question. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9485207 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. We gratefully present our findings with a slice of humor, a sprinkle of curiosity, and a dash of cheddar. Let's delve into the world of cheese and politics, where even the sharpest of minds are left pondering the dairy elections!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
The relationship between cheese consumption and political preferences has been a topic of humorous speculation and cheesy jokes for years. In the realm of Pennsylvania politics, where "whiz wit" can refer to both a type of cheesesteak and the state's political climate, we decided to embark on a rather unconventional quest to decipher the potential correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate.
This peculiar culinary-political journey led us to delve into data from the USDA and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, to analyze American cheese consumption and voting patterns in the Keystone State. Our exploration took us on a whirlwind of dairy-laden statistical analyses and political whimsy, and what we uncovered will surely leave our readers both amused and bemused.
As much as we'd like to say we approached this research with the utmost "provolone" attitude, the truth is that our methods were rigorous, our analysis was thorough, and our findings are "grate" significance to the realm of voter behavior and dairy consumption trends.
So grab a slice of your favorite cheddar, get comfortable, and let's embark on this Gouda-darn cheesy journey through the realm of American cheese consumption and its association with voting for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. It's a tale "brie-lliantly" bizarre and "feta-stically" intriguing, and we promise not to "whey-st" your time with any more dairy puns... okay, maybe just a few more.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our unorthodox investigation into the relationship between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania yielded some truly titillating findings. After plenty of number-crunching and a whole lot of cheesy jokes to keep our spirits high, we uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9485207 between these two seemingly unrelated variables for the years 1990 to 2020. The r-squared value of 0.8996916 further validated the robustness of the relationship we discovered. And with a p-value less than 0.01, we can confidently say that the likelihood of this correlation occurring by chance is about as slim as a sliver of Parmesan.
Figure 1 illustrates the strikingly close relationship between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. The scatterplot speaks volumes; it clearly shows a positively sloping cloud of data points, reminiscent of the hilly landscapes of the Keystone State, where cheese and politics seem to have formed a remarkably strong partnership over the years.
Now, to put all this statistical jargon into simpler terms: the more American cheese Pennsylvanians consumed, the more likely they were to cast their votes for the Republican presidential candidate. This correlation is so strong that one might even say that cheese has been a "wheely" influential factor in Pennsylvania elections.
As we bask in the warm glow of our findings, we must also acknowledge the limits of our study. While our data analysis revealed a striking relationship, we cannot claim causation. Cheese may have its way of wooing voters, but we dare not jump to any "brie-lliant" conclusions just yet. It's a fine line between correlation and "halloumi"-nation, after all.
We hope our research has provided food for thought and perhaps a chuckle or two. As we conclude this section, we invite our readers to ponder the cheesy mysteries of voter behavior and dairy delights. And who knows, with further research, we may soon uncover the true cheesy motivations behind political preferences. Stay tuned for more cheesy adventures in the world of academia!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has grated some truly gouda insights into the peculiar correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. The "cheddar" of evidence we've amassed confirms the remarkably high correlation, leaving us "brie-thless" in its wake. Our findings are as clear as a slice of havarti – the more American cheese Pennsylvanians devour, the more likely they are to lean towards the Grand Old Party.

Yet, as much as we'd love to crown cheese as the true "mascarpone" behind political choices, we must also recognize the limitations of our research. Correlation does not equate to causation, and we must tread carefully between cheesy conjectures and "mozzarellabilities." It's a delicate balance, to "camembert" not to leap to conclusions.

So, as we bid "adieu" to this cheesy journey through the labyrinth of voter preferences and dairy consumption, we suggest that perhaps there might be more feta-bulous mysteries to unravel in the political realm. But for now, we confidently declare that no further research is needed to prove the "grate" influence of American cheese on Pennsylvania's political landscape. After all, some things are better left to age like a fine Gouda – with a touch of mystery, a hint of sophistication, and a whole lot of humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Big and the Cheesy: A Gouda Look at American Cheese Consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Pennsylvania. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Dairy Politics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Big and the Cheesy: A Gouda Look at American Cheese Consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Pennsylvania. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Dairy Delights and Political Preferences


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Big and the Cheesy: A Gouda Look at American Cheese Consumption and Votes for the Republican Presidential Candidate in Pennsylvania with an abstract of In this paper, we present the findings of our delightfully cheesy academic pursuit to unravel the correlation between American cheese consumption and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Pennsylvania. Utilizing data from the USDA and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, along with the Harvard Dataverse, we embarked on a grand fromage exploration to answer this perplexing question. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9485207 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2020. We gratefully present our findings with a slice of humor, a sprinkle of curiosity, and a dash of cheddar. Let's delve into the world of cheese and politics, where even the sharpest of minds are left pondering the dairy elections!

ChatGPT:

American cheese consumption, Republican presidential candidate votes, Pennsylvania, correlation, USDA data, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, cheese consumption and politics, dairy elections, correlation coefficient, voting patterns, cheese consumption analysis, political voting behavior, Pennsylvania cheese consumption, Republican voting trends

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

American cheese consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of American cheese in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with American cheese consumption

Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania
Detailed data title: Total votes cast for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania

Correlation r = 0.9485207 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8996916 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 90% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., American cheese consumption) over the 8 years from 1990 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00033. 0.0003280321665218058000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 0.033% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,048 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.74, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19921996200020042008201220162020
American cheese consumption (Pounds per person)11.255911.808712.683912.861213.130613.256914.362115.5
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania (Total votes)17918401801170228113027938502655880268043029707303377670




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([11.2559,11.8087,12.6839,12.8612,13.1306,13.2569,14.3621,15.5,])
array_2 = np.array([1791840,1801170,2281130,2793850,2655880,2680430,2970730,3377670,])
array_1_name = "American cheese consumption"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Pennsylvania"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 4467 · Black Variable ID: 553 · Red Variable ID: 26025
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0