Download png, svg
AI explanation
As The Game Theorists' video titles become more enticing, viewers experience a surge in motivation, manifesting as a newfound interest in renewable energy. This unprecedented drive prompts a wave of creativity and innovation in Canada, leading to groundbreaking advancements in renewable energy production. Ultimately, The Game Theorists' clickbait mastery inadvertently sparks a nationwide push towards a more sustainable future. Remember, it's all just a theory - a game theory!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image that depicts a Canadian cityscape with modern, sleek wind turbines towering over the skyline. In the foreground, show a group of people gathered around their screens, displaying The Game Theorists' clickbait-y video titles. Their expressions should convey captivation and curiosity. Meanwhile, within the city, illustrate innovative minds collaborating and experimenting with renewable energy sources, symbolizing the surge of inspiration and innovation sparked by the viewers' curiosity. The combination of the urban environment and the renewable energy theme should be seamlessly integrated to convey the narrative of a sustainable future for Canada. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How clickbait-y The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are and Renewable energy production in Canada. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Woodblock painting Pop art Voxel art a funny image you would see on reddit Cutsy graphics
ChatGPT: a funny image you would see on reddit
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How clickbait-y The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are and Renewable energy production in Canada, in the following situation: As The Game Theorists' video titles become more enticing, viewers experience a surge in motivation, manifesting as a newfound interest in renewable energy. This unprecedented drive prompts a wave of creativity and innovation in Canada, leading to groundbreaking advancements in renewable energy production. Ultimately, The Game Theorists' clickbait mastery inadvertently sparks a nationwide push towards a more sustainable future. Remember, it's all just a theory - a game theory!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Canadian city, massive wind turbines dot the landscape, their sleek blades spinning gracefully in the wind. Meanwhile, a group of enthralled viewers gaze at their screens, captivated by The Game Theorists' clickbait-y video titles. As they watch, a spark of inspiration ignites within them, leading to an intense curiosity about renewable energy. This curiosity cascades through the city, fueling a surge of innovative minds and hands-on experimentation. As a result, groundbreaking advancements in renewable energy production take shape, propelling Canada towards a sustainable future.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Canadian city, massive wind turbines dot the landscape, their sleek blades spinning gracefully in the wind. Meanwhile, a group of enthralled viewers gaze at their screens, captivated by The Game Theorists' clickbait-y video titles. As they watch, a spark of inspiration ignites within them, leading to an intense curiosity about renewable energy. This curiosity cascades through the city, fueling a surge of innovative minds and hands-on experimentation. As a result, groundbreaking advancements in renewable energy production take shape, propelling Canada towards a sustainable future. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image that depicts a Canadian cityscape with modern, sleek wind turbines towering over the skyline. In the foreground, show a group of people gathered around their screens, displaying The Game Theorists' clickbait-y video titles. Their expressions should convey captivation and curiosity. Meanwhile, within the city, illustrate innovative minds collaborating and experimenting with renewable energy sources, symbolizing the surge of inspiration and innovation sparked by the viewers' curiosity. The combination of the urban environment and the renewable energy theme should be seamlessly integrated to convey the narrative of a sustainable future for Canada.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in How clickbait-y The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are caused Renewable energy production in Canada to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.
AI academic paper
Watt's Clickbait Got to Do with It? The Shocking Connection Between The Game Theorists' YouTube Titles and Renewable Energy Production in Canada Journal of Renewable Energy and Internet Influence Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are and Renewable energy production in Canada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.
Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9681788 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Watt's Clickbait Got to Do with It? The Shocking Connection Between The Game Theorists' YouTube Titles and Renewable Energy Production in Canada
[[ABSTRACT]]
In the era of quirky YouTube video titles and renewable energy revolutions, we sought to answer the confounding question: Does clickbait affect the production of renewable energy in our friendly neighbor, Canada, eh? Through rigorous analysis of The Game Theorists' video titles and Canada's renewable energy production data, we uncovered a startlingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9681788, with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2009 to 2021. Our findings suggest that the sensationalist allure of YouTube titles may be more electrifying than we previously thought. Join us as we unravel the inner workings of energy and entertainment, and explore the electric connections between YouTube clickbait and renewable energy production.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are and Renewable energy production in Canada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Watt's Clickbait Got to Do with It? The Shocking Connection Between The Game Theorists' YouTube Titles and Renewable Energy Production in Canada
[[ABSTRACT]]
In the era of quirky YouTube video titles and renewable energy revolutions, we sought to answer the confounding question: Does clickbait affect the production of renewable energy in our friendly neighbor, Canada, eh? Through rigorous analysis of The Game Theorists' video titles and Canada's renewable energy production data, we uncovered a startlingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9681788, with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2009 to 2021. Our findings suggest that the sensationalist allure of YouTube titles may be more electrifying than we previously thought. Join us as we unravel the inner workings of energy and entertainment, and explore the electric connections between YouTube clickbait and renewable energy production.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
Ah, the world of academic research - where we delve into the depths of data, crunch numbers, and occasionally stumble upon some truly electrifying discoveries. Today, we embark on a journey that may seem like a leap of logic, a quantum leap, if you will. We aim to uncover the shocking connection between The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles and the production of renewable energy in the land of maple syrup and politeness, Canada. Strap in, because this is going to be a wild academic ride.
As the landscape of online content creation evolves, so too do our research pursuits. We find ourselves amidst a digital jungle, navigating through the intricate web of clickbait and eye-catching thumbnails. It's a world where attention is the currency, and the allure of a sensationalist title can be as captivating as a freshly brewed pot of coffee in the morning - and let's face it, for us academics, that's saying something.
At the same time, the world is abuzz, quite literally, with discussions and initiatives surrounding renewable energy. The quest for sustainable power sources has become increasingly paramount in our current zeitgeist. Amidst this whirlwind of progress and online entertainment, a question arose – could the click-worthy titles of YouTube videos hold sway over the production of renewable energy in Canada, eh?
So, armed with a healthy dose of skepticism and just a hint of curiosity, we set out to investigate this curious correlation. We chose The Game Theorists as the subject of our analysis due to their enigmatic ability to trigger the curiosity of viewers with their thought-provoking video titles. It's as if every title is a tantalizing puzzle waiting to be solved - very much like the statistical puzzles that await us in our quest for knowledge.
As we delved deep into the archives of YouTube, mining the data with the tenacity of a prospector seeking gold, we also ventured into the realm of Canadian renewable energy production statistics. We sought to unveil the hidden ties that bind the captivating world of YouTube clickbait to the realm of renewable energy.
Our findings, to put it quite bluntly, jolted us like a defibrillator to the chest. The correlation coefficient we unearthed was as shocking as accidentally touching a metal doorknob after shuffling across the carpet in woolen socks. With a value of 0.9681788 and a p-value smaller than the decimal places we usually care to analyze, our results defy the norms of statistical probability.
So, dear reader, buckle up and plug in, because this paper is about to illuminate your neurons like a symphony of lightning bugs on a warm summer's night. We invite you to join us as we uncover the electrifying connection between YouTube clickbait and the production of renewable energy, exploring the interplay between entertainment and energy in a way that Nikola Tesla himself would surely appreciate.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are and Renewable energy production in Canada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Watt's Clickbait Got to Do with It? The Shocking Connection Between The Game Theorists' YouTube Titles and Renewable Energy Production in Canada
[[ABSTRACT]]
In the era of quirky YouTube video titles and renewable energy revolutions, we sought to answer the confounding question: Does clickbait affect the production of renewable energy in our friendly neighbor, Canada, eh? Through rigorous analysis of The Game Theorists' video titles and Canada's renewable energy production data, we uncovered a startlingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9681788, with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2009 to 2021. Our findings suggest that the sensationalist allure of YouTube titles may be more electrifying than we previously thought. Join us as we unravel the inner workings of energy and entertainment, and explore the electric connections between YouTube clickbait and renewable energy production.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the world of academic research - where we delve into the depths of data, crunch numbers, and occasionally stumble upon some truly electrifying discoveries. Today, we embark on a journey that may seem like a leap of logic, a quantum leap, if you will. We aim to uncover the shocking connection between The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles and the production of renewable energy in the land of maple syrup and politeness, Canada. Strap in, because this is going to be a wild academic ride.
As the landscape of online content creation evolves, so too do our research pursuits. We find ourselves amidst a digital jungle, navigating through the intricate web of clickbait and eye-catching thumbnails. It's a world where attention is the currency, and the allure of a sensationalist title can be as captivating as a freshly brewed pot of coffee in the morning - and let's face it, for us academics, that's saying something.
At the same time, the world is abuzz, quite literally, with discussions and initiatives surrounding renewable energy. The quest for sustainable power sources has become increasingly paramount in our current zeitgeist. Amidst this whirlwind of progress and online entertainment, a question arose – could the click-worthy titles of YouTube videos hold sway over the production of renewable energy in Canada, eh?
So, armed with a healthy dose of skepticism and just a hint of curiosity, we set out to investigate this curious correlation. We chose The Game Theorists as the subject of our analysis due to their enigmatic ability to trigger the curiosity of viewers with their thought-provoking video titles. It's as if every title is a tantalizing puzzle waiting to be solved - very much like the statistical puzzles that await us in our quest for knowledge.
As we delved deep into the archives of YouTube, mining the data with the tenacity of a prospector seeking gold, we also ventured into the realm of Canadian renewable energy production statistics. We sought to unveil the hidden ties that bind the captivating world of YouTube clickbait to the realm of renewable energy.
Our findings, to put it quite bluntly, jolted us like a defibrillator to the chest. The correlation coefficient we unearthed was as shocking as accidentally touching a metal doorknob after shuffling across the carpet in woolen socks. With a value of 0.9681788 and a p-value smaller than the decimal places we usually care to analyze, our results defy the norms of statistical probability.
So, dear reader, buckle up and plug in, because this paper is about to illuminate your neurons like a symphony of lightning bugs on a warm summer's night. We invite you to join us as we uncover the electrifying connection between YouTube clickbait and the production of renewable energy, exploring the interplay between entertainment and energy in a way that Nikola Tesla himself would surely appreciate.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al." the authors find that renewable energy production is influenced by a multitude of factors, including government policies, investment in green technologies, and public attitudes towards environmental conservation. While these studies provide valuable insights into the complexities of renewable energy production, they fail to consider the electrifying impact of YouTube clickbait on this vital industry.
Moreover, Doe's work emphasizes the significance of public engagement and awareness in the sustainability movement. The study underscores the importance of effective communication strategies in promoting renewable energy adoption. However, the enigmatic allure of clickbait titles on YouTube remains a glaring blind spot in the realm of public engagement, leaving a chasm in our understanding of the dynamics at play.
Jones' research delves into the behavioral economics of energy consumption, shedding light on the psychological factors that influence individual energy choices. Despite its comprehensive analysis, the study overlooks the potential influence of electrifying YouTube titles on viewers' perceptions of renewable energy, leaving us in the dark about the true extent of clickbait's power.
Moving on to the world of non-fiction literature, "Energy Revolution" by Thomas Edison offers a compelling narrative on the evolution of energy production and consumption. While this book provides a historical overview of energy technologies, it regrettably omits any mention of the electrifying impact of YouTube clickbait on the renewable energy landscape.
In "Watts in a Name: The Shocking Influence of YouTube Titles on Renewable Energy" by Lorem Ipsum, the authors delve into the captivating world of YouTube titles and their potential effects on energy-related behaviors. Despite its intriguing premise, the study fails to draw firm conclusions, leaving readers with more questions than answers - a shocking twist reminiscent of a Game Theorists' video cliffhanger.
The fictional realm also offers tantalizing prospects for our inquiry. In "Watt's Up, Doc?" by J.K. Rowling, the protagonist stumbles upon a magical clickbait title that promises to reveal the secrets of renewable energy production. As the protagonist's curiosity leads them down a whimsical path of adventures, we are left to wonder if the captivating allure of clickbait transcends even the boundaries of reality.
Similarly, in "The Renewable Energy Code" by Dan Brown, the protagonist unravels cryptic clues embedded within YouTube clickbait titles, each hinting at a revolutionary discovery in the realm of renewable energy. While purely fictional, these narratives pique our interest in the potential influence of sensationalist titles on the perception of energy-related content.
Lastly, the movies we've watched in our quest for inspiration have sparked connections to our research topic. In "The Shocking Click: A Renewable Energy Adventure," a daring protagonist navigates the treacherous landscape of YouTube clickbait titles, seeking to unravel the secrets of renewable energy production amidst a whirlwind of suspense and unexpected plot twists. Though purely fictional, the electrifying drama of the film invites us to consider the captivating potential of YouTube titles in shaping our perceptions of energy-related phenomena.
In summary, while existing literature provides invaluable insights into renewable energy production and public engagement, the influence of YouTube clickbait titles on this crucial domain remains shrouded in mystery. As we embark on our own exploratory journey, we invite readers to approach the interplay between entertainment and energy with a sense of curiosity and a willingness to embrace the shockingly unexpected.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are and Renewable energy production in Canada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2009 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Watt's Clickbait Got to Do with It? The Shocking Connection Between The Game Theorists' YouTube Titles and Renewable Energy Production in Canada
[[ABSTRACT]]
In the era of quirky YouTube video titles and renewable energy revolutions, we sought to answer the confounding question: Does clickbait affect the production of renewable energy in our friendly neighbor, Canada, eh? Through rigorous analysis of The Game Theorists' video titles and Canada's renewable energy production data, we uncovered a startlingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9681788, with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2009 to 2021. Our findings suggest that the sensationalist allure of YouTube titles may be more electrifying than we previously thought. Join us as we unravel the inner workings of energy and entertainment, and explore the electric connections between YouTube clickbait and renewable energy production.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the world of academic research - where we delve into the depths of data, crunch numbers, and occasionally stumble upon some truly electrifying discoveries. Today, we embark on a journey that may seem like a leap of logic, a quantum leap, if you will. We aim to uncover the shocking connection between The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles and the production of renewable energy in the land of maple syrup and politeness, Canada. Strap in, because this is going to be a wild academic ride.
As the landscape of online content creation evolves, so too do our research pursuits. We find ourselves amidst a digital jungle, navigating through the intricate web of clickbait and eye-catching thumbnails. It's a world where attention is the currency, and the allure of a sensationalist title can be as captivating as a freshly brewed pot of coffee in the morning - and let's face it, for us academics, that's saying something.
At the same time, the world is abuzz, quite literally, with discussions and initiatives surrounding renewable energy. The quest for sustainable power sources has become increasingly paramount in our current zeitgeist. Amidst this whirlwind of progress and online entertainment, a question arose – could the click-worthy titles of YouTube videos hold sway over the production of renewable energy in Canada, eh?
So, armed with a healthy dose of skepticism and just a hint of curiosity, we set out to investigate this curious correlation. We chose The Game Theorists as the subject of our analysis due to their enigmatic ability to trigger the curiosity of viewers with their thought-provoking video titles. It's as if every title is a tantalizing puzzle waiting to be solved - very much like the statistical puzzles that await us in our quest for knowledge.
As we delved deep into the archives of YouTube, mining the data with the tenacity of a prospector seeking gold, we also ventured into the realm of Canadian renewable energy production statistics. We sought to unveil the hidden ties that bind the captivating world of YouTube clickbait to the realm of renewable energy.
Our findings, to put it quite bluntly, jolted us like a defibrillator to the chest. The correlation coefficient we unearthed was as shocking as accidentally touching a metal doorknob after shuffling across the carpet in woolen socks. With a value of 0.9681788 and a p-value smaller than the decimal places we usually care to analyze, our results defy the norms of statistical probability.
So, dear reader, buckle up and plug in, because this paper is about to illuminate your neurons like a symphony of lightning bugs on a warm summer's night. We invite you to join us as we uncover the electrifying connection between YouTube clickbait and the production of renewable energy, exploring the interplay between entertainment and energy in a way that Nikola Tesla himself would surely appreciate.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To unravel the illuminating connection between The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles and renewable energy production in the Great White North, our research team employed an eclectic mix of data collection methods that would make even the most seasoned researcher raise an eyebrow. We harnessed the power of artificial intelligence (AI) analysis to sift through the vast expanse of YouTube video titles from 2009 to 2021, capturing the essence of clickbait in all its tempting glory. The AI was programmed to detect the subtle nuances of clickbait, such as hyperbolic language, tantalizing teasers, and the magnetic pull of mysterious queries – think of it as a digital Sherlock Holmes with a knack for unraveling titles instead of mysteries.
Simultaneously, our stalwart team traversed the digital landscape to acquire comprehensive data on renewable energy production in Canada, channeling the tenacity of a spelunker in search of hidden treasures. We relied on the Energy Information Administration, analyzing the wattage of renewable energy production across wind, solar, hydro, and other sources with meticulous precision. We were determined to leave no electron unturned in our pursuit of understanding how The Game Theorists' titles could potentially spark motivation for renewable energy in the land of the maple leaf.
The statistical analysis that followed was as rigorous as a workout regimen for data, involving complex calculations and hypothesis testing that left our calculator batteries drained and gasping for a recharge. We computed the correlation coefficient, unleashing the full force of Pearson's r to quantify the relationship between the clickbait allure of The Game Theorists' video titles and the electrifying realm of renewable energy production in Canada. With the guiding light of p-values, we delved into the depths of statistical significance, navigating the murky waters of hypothesis testing with the precision of a mathematical maestro.
In essence, our methodology was a dance of technology, determination, and a dash of daredevilry, navigating through the digital labyrinth and the realm of sustainable energy with the whimsical charm of an academic explorer on an unconventional adventure. With data in hand and hypotheses at the ready, we embarked on an academic odyssey to unlock the electrifying connection between YouTube clickbait and renewable energy production, braving the perils of statistical analysis with the fortitude befitting modern-day explorers of the digital age.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are and Renewable energy production in Canada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration .
For the time period 2009 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9681788, r-squared of 0.9373701, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Watt's Clickbait Got to Do with It? The Shocking Connection Between The Game Theorists' YouTube Titles and Renewable Energy Production in Canada
[[ABSTRACT]]
In the era of quirky YouTube video titles and renewable energy revolutions, we sought to answer the confounding question: Does clickbait affect the production of renewable energy in our friendly neighbor, Canada, eh? Through rigorous analysis of The Game Theorists' video titles and Canada's renewable energy production data, we uncovered a startlingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9681788, with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2009 to 2021. Our findings suggest that the sensationalist allure of YouTube titles may be more electrifying than we previously thought. Join us as we unravel the inner workings of energy and entertainment, and explore the electric connections between YouTube clickbait and renewable energy production.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ah, the world of academic research - where we delve into the depths of data, crunch numbers, and occasionally stumble upon some truly electrifying discoveries. Today, we embark on a journey that may seem like a leap of logic, a quantum leap, if you will. We aim to uncover the shocking connection between The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles and the production of renewable energy in the land of maple syrup and politeness, Canada. Strap in, because this is going to be a wild academic ride.
As the landscape of online content creation evolves, so too do our research pursuits. We find ourselves amidst a digital jungle, navigating through the intricate web of clickbait and eye-catching thumbnails. It's a world where attention is the currency, and the allure of a sensationalist title can be as captivating as a freshly brewed pot of coffee in the morning - and let's face it, for us academics, that's saying something.
At the same time, the world is abuzz, quite literally, with discussions and initiatives surrounding renewable energy. The quest for sustainable power sources has become increasingly paramount in our current zeitgeist. Amidst this whirlwind of progress and online entertainment, a question arose – could the click-worthy titles of YouTube videos hold sway over the production of renewable energy in Canada, eh?
So, armed with a healthy dose of skepticism and just a hint of curiosity, we set out to investigate this curious correlation. We chose The Game Theorists as the subject of our analysis due to their enigmatic ability to trigger the curiosity of viewers with their thought-provoking video titles. It's as if every title is a tantalizing puzzle waiting to be solved - very much like the statistical puzzles that await us in our quest for knowledge.
As we delved deep into the archives of YouTube, mining the data with the tenacity of a prospector seeking gold, we also ventured into the realm of Canadian renewable energy production statistics. We sought to unveil the hidden ties that bind the captivating world of YouTube clickbait to the realm of renewable energy.
Our findings, to put it quite bluntly, jolted us like a defibrillator to the chest. The correlation coefficient we unearthed was as shocking as accidentally touching a metal doorknob after shuffling across the carpet in woolen socks. With a value of 0.9681788 and a p-value smaller than the decimal places we usually care to analyze, our results defy the norms of statistical probability.
So, dear reader, buckle up and plug in, because this paper is about to illuminate your neurons like a symphony of lightning bugs on a warm summer's night. We invite you to join us as we uncover the electrifying connection between YouTube clickbait and the production of renewable energy, exploring the interplay between entertainment and energy in a way that Nikola Tesla himself would surely appreciate.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles and Canada's renewable energy production data unearthed a shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9681788 for the time period from 2009 to 2021. This correlation coefficient, much like a high-voltage power line, suggests a strong relationship between the clickbait-y allure of video titles and the production of renewable energy, especially in the Great White North. However, we must tread carefully, as correlation does not imply causation, but it sure does make for an electrifying research finding!
The r-squared value of 0.9373701 underscores the robustness of this relationship, as if it's shouting, "Yes, there's a magnetic connection here!"
To visually showcase this shocking relationship, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that graphically illustrates the powerful correlation between The Game Theorists' click-worthy titles and Canada's renewable energy production. This visual representation is as clear as day, providing a striking illustration of the electric connection we have discovered - and all without needing to apply a voltage!
The p-value being less than 0.01 further confirms the statistical significance of our findings. It's as if the p-value is saying, "You can't dismiss this electrifying connection - it's statistically charged with significance!"
In summary, our research has sparked a new understanding of the potential influence of clickbait on the production of renewable energy. We might say that this connection is positively electric!
Our findings open the door to further exploration of the interplay between online content engagement and real-world energy outcomes. It's a research journey that promises to be as enlightening as it is jolting, and we invite fellow enthusiasts to join us on this electrifying academic odyssey.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are and Renewable energy production in Canada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Watt's Clickbait Got to Do with It? The Shocking Connection Between The Game Theorists' YouTube Titles and Renewable Energy Production in Canada
[[ABSTRACT]]
In the era of quirky YouTube video titles and renewable energy revolutions, we sought to answer the confounding question: Does clickbait affect the production of renewable energy in our friendly neighbor, Canada, eh? Through rigorous analysis of The Game Theorists' video titles and Canada's renewable energy production data, we uncovered a startlingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9681788, with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2009 to 2021. Our findings suggest that the sensationalist allure of YouTube titles may be more electrifying than we previously thought. Join us as we unravel the inner workings of energy and entertainment, and explore the electric connections between YouTube clickbait and renewable energy production.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al." the authors find that renewable energy production is influenced by a multitude of factors, including government policies, investment in green technologies, and public attitudes towards environmental conservation. While these studies provide valuable insights into the complexities of renewable energy production, they fail to consider the electrifying impact of YouTube clickbait on this vital industry.
Moreover, Doe's work emphasizes the significance of public engagement and awareness in the sustainability movement. The study underscores the importance of effective communication strategies in promoting renewable energy adoption. However, the enigmatic allure of clickbait titles on YouTube remains a glaring blind spot in the realm of public engagement, leaving a chasm in our understanding of the dynamics at play.
Jones' research delves into the behavioral economics of energy consumption, shedding light on the psychological factors that influence individual energy choices. Despite its comprehensive analysis, the study overlooks the potential influence of electrifying YouTube titles on viewers' perceptions of renewable energy, leaving us in the dark about the true extent of clickbait's power.
Moving on to the world of non-fiction literature, "Energy Revolution" by Thomas Edison offers a compelling narrative on the evolution of energy production and consumption. While this book provides a historical overview of energy technologies, it regrettably omits any mention of the electrifying impact of YouTube clickbait on the renewable energy landscape.
In "Watts in a Name: The Shocking Influence of YouTube Titles on Renewable Energy" by Lorem Ipsum, the authors delve into the captivating world of YouTube titles and their potential effects on energy-related behaviors. Despite its intriguing premise, the study fails to draw firm conclusions, leaving readers with more questions than answers - a shocking twist reminiscent of a Game Theorists' video cliffhanger.
The fictional realm also offers tantalizing prospects for our inquiry. In "Watt's Up, Doc?" by J.K. Rowling, the protagonist stumbles upon a magical clickbait title that promises to reveal the secrets of renewable energy production. As the protagonist's curiosity leads them down a whimsical path of adventures, we are left to wonder if the captivating allure of clickbait transcends even the boundaries of reality.
Similarly, in "The Renewable Energy Code" by Dan Brown, the protagonist unravels cryptic clues embedded within YouTube clickbait titles, each hinting at a revolutionary discovery in the realm of renewable energy. While purely fictional, these narratives pique our interest in the potential influence of sensationalist titles on the perception of energy-related content.
Lastly, the movies we've watched in our quest for inspiration have sparked connections to our research topic. In "The Shocking Click: A Renewable Energy Adventure," a daring protagonist navigates the treacherous landscape of YouTube clickbait titles, seeking to unravel the secrets of renewable energy production amidst a whirlwind of suspense and unexpected plot twists. Though purely fictional, the electrifying drama of the film invites us to consider the captivating potential of YouTube titles in shaping our perceptions of energy-related phenomena.
In summary, while existing literature provides invaluable insights into renewable energy production and public engagement, the influence of YouTube clickbait titles on this crucial domain remains shrouded in mystery. As we embark on our own exploratory journey, we invite readers to approach the interplay between entertainment and energy with a sense of curiosity and a willingness to embrace the shockingly unexpected.
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles and Canada's renewable energy production data unearthed a shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9681788 for the time period from 2009 to 2021. This correlation coefficient, much like a high-voltage power line, suggests a strong relationship between the clickbait-y allure of video titles and the production of renewable energy, especially in the Great White North. However, we must tread carefully, as correlation does not imply causation, but it sure does make for an electrifying research finding!
The r-squared value of 0.9373701 underscores the robustness of this relationship, as if it's shouting, "Yes, there's a magnetic connection here!"
To visually showcase this shocking relationship, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that graphically illustrates the powerful correlation between The Game Theorists' click-worthy titles and Canada's renewable energy production. This visual representation is as clear as day, providing a striking illustration of the electric connection we have discovered - and all without needing to apply a voltage!
The p-value being less than 0.01 further confirms the statistical significance of our findings. It's as if the p-value is saying, "You can't dismiss this electrifying connection - it's statistically charged with significance!"
In summary, our research has sparked a new understanding of the potential influence of clickbait on the production of renewable energy. We might say that this connection is positively electric!
Our findings open the door to further exploration of the interplay between online content engagement and real-world energy outcomes. It's a research journey that promises to be as enlightening as it is jolting, and we invite fellow enthusiasts to join us on this electrifying academic odyssey.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our findings have electrified the research community, shedding new light on the potent and positively charged relationship between YouTube clickbait and renewable energy production in Canada. The shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9681788, akin to a bolt of lightning illuminating the night sky, provides compelling evidence of the magnetic pull exerted by clickbait-y video titles on the renewable energy landscape.
Building upon the literature review, our results validate and amplify previous research insights into the multifaceted dynamics of renewable energy production. Just as Thomas Edison sparked a revolution in electricity, our study ignites a paradigm shift in understanding the electrifying influence of YouTube clickbait on energy-related behaviors. Similar to the whimsical adventures in "Watt's Up, Doc?" by J.K. Rowling, our research unravels the enigmatic allure of clickbait titles, revealing their spellbinding impact on perceptions of renewable energy.
The robust r-squared value of 0.9373701 underscores the resilience of this association, evoking images of a strong magnetic field that refuses to be disrupted. It's almost as if the data points are saying, "You can't escape this magnetic attraction - we're locked in an electrifying embrace!" Our results provide a captivating visualization of this powerful relationship, akin to a dazzling display of auroras in the night sky, captivating observers with their radiant beauty and magnetic allure.
The statistical significance emphasized by the p-value less than 0.01 reinforces the undeniable impact of clickbait on renewable energy production. It's as if the p-value is exclaiming, "This finding is positively electric! You can't underestimate the shocking influence of clickbait on real-world outcomes."
In line with the spirit of "The Renewable Energy Code" by Dan Brown, our research embraces the potential influence of seemingly cryptic clickbait titles on shaping perceptions of renewable energy, transcending the boundaries of conventional understanding. As we navigate the uncharted territories of online content engagement and its tangible effects on energy outcomes, our study paves the way for an electrifying academic odyssey, inviting fellow enthusiasts to join us in this illuminating journey.
In conclusion, our research injects a surge of energy into the scholarly discourse, as we spark captivating conversations and perhaps even a few sparks of curiosity. With our findings, we affirm that the connection between YouTube clickbait and renewable energy production is positively electric, and it's time for researchers to embrace the shockingly unexpected influence of clickbait-y titles on our understanding of the energy landscape.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are and Renewable energy production in Canada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Watt's Clickbait Got to Do with It? The Shocking Connection Between The Game Theorists' YouTube Titles and Renewable Energy Production in Canada
[[ABSTRACT]]
In the era of quirky YouTube video titles and renewable energy revolutions, we sought to answer the confounding question: Does clickbait affect the production of renewable energy in our friendly neighbor, Canada, eh? Through rigorous analysis of The Game Theorists' video titles and Canada's renewable energy production data, we uncovered a startlingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9681788, with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2009 to 2021. Our findings suggest that the sensationalist allure of YouTube titles may be more electrifying than we previously thought. Join us as we unravel the inner workings of energy and entertainment, and explore the electric connections between YouTube clickbait and renewable energy production.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ah, the world of academic research - where we delve into the depths of data, crunch numbers, and occasionally stumble upon some truly electrifying discoveries. Today, we embark on a journey that may seem like a leap of logic, a quantum leap, if you will. We aim to uncover the shocking connection between The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles and the production of renewable energy in the land of maple syrup and politeness, Canada. Strap in, because this is going to be a wild academic ride.
As the landscape of online content creation evolves, so too do our research pursuits. We find ourselves amidst a digital jungle, navigating through the intricate web of clickbait and eye-catching thumbnails. It's a world where attention is the currency, and the allure of a sensationalist title can be as captivating as a freshly brewed pot of coffee in the morning - and let's face it, for us academics, that's saying something.
At the same time, the world is abuzz, quite literally, with discussions and initiatives surrounding renewable energy. The quest for sustainable power sources has become increasingly paramount in our current zeitgeist. Amidst this whirlwind of progress and online entertainment, a question arose – could the click-worthy titles of YouTube videos hold sway over the production of renewable energy in Canada, eh?
So, armed with a healthy dose of skepticism and just a hint of curiosity, we set out to investigate this curious correlation. We chose The Game Theorists as the subject of our analysis due to their enigmatic ability to trigger the curiosity of viewers with their thought-provoking video titles. It's as if every title is a tantalizing puzzle waiting to be solved - very much like the statistical puzzles that await us in our quest for knowledge.
As we delved deep into the archives of YouTube, mining the data with the tenacity of a prospector seeking gold, we also ventured into the realm of Canadian renewable energy production statistics. We sought to unveil the hidden ties that bind the captivating world of YouTube clickbait to the realm of renewable energy.
Our findings, to put it quite bluntly, jolted us like a defibrillator to the chest. The correlation coefficient we unearthed was as shocking as accidentally touching a metal doorknob after shuffling across the carpet in woolen socks. With a value of 0.9681788 and a p-value smaller than the decimal places we usually care to analyze, our results defy the norms of statistical probability.
So, dear reader, buckle up and plug in, because this paper is about to illuminate your neurons like a symphony of lightning bugs on a warm summer's night. We invite you to join us as we uncover the electrifying connection between YouTube clickbait and the production of renewable energy, exploring the interplay between entertainment and energy in a way that Nikola Tesla himself would surely appreciate.
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles and Canada's renewable energy production data unearthed a shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9681788 for the time period from 2009 to 2021. This correlation coefficient, much like a high-voltage power line, suggests a strong relationship between the clickbait-y allure of video titles and the production of renewable energy, especially in the Great White North. However, we must tread carefully, as correlation does not imply causation, but it sure does make for an electrifying research finding!
The r-squared value of 0.9373701 underscores the robustness of this relationship, as if it's shouting, "Yes, there's a magnetic connection here!"
To visually showcase this shocking relationship, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that graphically illustrates the powerful correlation between The Game Theorists' click-worthy titles and Canada's renewable energy production. This visual representation is as clear as day, providing a striking illustration of the electric connection we have discovered - and all without needing to apply a voltage!
The p-value being less than 0.01 further confirms the statistical significance of our findings. It's as if the p-value is saying, "You can't dismiss this electrifying connection - it's statistically charged with significance!"
In summary, our research has sparked a new understanding of the potential influence of clickbait on the production of renewable energy. We might say that this connection is positively electric!
Our findings open the door to further exploration of the interplay between online content engagement and real-world energy outcomes. It's a research journey that promises to be as enlightening as it is jolting, and we invite fellow enthusiasts to join us on this electrifying academic odyssey.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our research has shed light on the electrifying link between The Game Theorists' YouTube video titles and renewable energy production in Canada. Our findings have sparked more excitement than a Tesla coil at a science fair!
The shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9681788 has left us feeling positively charged with enthusiasm for future research. It's as if the click-worthy titles have charged up Canada's renewable energy production like a giant battery!
Although correlation does not imply causation, the magnetic pull between clickbait and renewable energy in the Great White North is undeniable. We have certainly blown the lid off the box of statistical probabilities!
In the spirit of embracing the electrifying nature of our findings, we confidently assert that no further research in this area is needed. This connection between clickbait and renewable energy in Canada is as solid as a copper conductor!
Now, join us in celebrating this shocking revelation by flipping the switch on any further studies in this boisterous, electrifying, and pun-tastic field of research! Let's power down and call it a day - no need to add fuel to the fire, because this spark of discovery is enough to light up the scientific community for years to come!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Watt's Clickbait Got to Do with It? The Shocking Connection Between The Game Theorists' YouTube Titles and Renewable Energy Production in Canada. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
Journal of Renewable Energy and Internet Influence
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Watt's Clickbait Got to Do with It? The Shocking Connection Between The Game Theorists' YouTube Titles and Renewable Energy Production in Canada. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Modern Game Theory and Sustainable Energy Solutions
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Watt's Clickbait Got to Do with It? The Shocking Connection Between The Game Theorists' YouTube Titles and Renewable Energy Production in Canada with an abstract of In the era of quirky YouTube video titles and renewable energy revolutions, we sought to answer the confounding question: Does clickbait affect the production of renewable energy in our friendly neighbor, Canada, eh? Through rigorous analysis of The Game Theorists' video titles and Canada's renewable energy production data, we uncovered a startlingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9681788, with a p-value less than 0.01 from 2009 to 2021. Our findings suggest that the sensationalist allure of YouTube titles may be more electrifying than we previously thought. Join us as we unravel the inner workings of energy and entertainment, and explore the electric connections between YouTube clickbait and renewable energy production.
ChatGPT:
The Game Theorists, YouTube titles, clickbait, renewable energy, Canada, correlation coefficient, p-value, energy production data, sensationalist YouTube titles, energy and entertainment, electric connections, renewable energy revolution, renewable energy production in Canada
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
How clickbait-y The Game Theorists YouTube video titles areDetailed data title: How clickbait-y The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.
See what else correlates with How clickbait-y The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are
Renewable energy production in Canada
Detailed data title: Total renewable energy production in Canada in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Renewable energy production in Canada
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9373701 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Renewable energy production in Canada) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How clickbait-y The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are) over the 13 years from 2009 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.8E-8. 0.0000000582801455644564360000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 5.8E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 17,158,502 random variables You don't actually need 17 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.89, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
How clickbait-y The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are (Clickbait-y score) | 4.2353 | 3.25 | 5 | 4.7826 | 5.52 | 5.2 | 5.9524 | 6.1897 | 6.4082 | 6.5862 | 6.1724 | 6.0847 | 5.9655 |
Renewable energy production in Canada (Billion kWh) | 379.545 | 365.951 | 391.923 | 398.382 | 417.136 | 411.972 | 417.2 | 425.976 | 436.893 | 429.192 | 423.419 | 431.097 | 427.444 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.2353,3.25,5,4.7826,5.52,5.2,5.9524,6.1897,6.4082,6.5862,6.1724,6.0847,5.9655,])
array_2 = np.array([379.545,365.951,391.923,398.382,417.136,411.972,417.2,425.976,436.893,429.192,423.419,431.097,427.444,])
array_1_name = "How clickbait-y The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Renewable energy production in Canada"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only How clickbait-y The Game Theorists YouTube video titles are
- Line chart for only Renewable energy production in Canada
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Watt's Clickbait Got to Do with It? The Shocking Connection Between The Game Theorists' YouTube Titles and Renewable Energy Production in Canada
Big thanks for reviewing!
Correlation ID: 4380 · Black Variable ID: 25727 · Red Variable ID: 23575