AI explanation
The cleaner air in NYC led to residents having more energy, which somehow traveled all the way to Australia, sparking a surge in electricity generation as a byproduct of this transcontinental transfer of pep and vigor. As New Yorkers took in that pristine city air, they unwittingly became like urban, energy-boosting, power plants, and Australia was left wondering why they suddenly had an electrifying influx of wattage!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Style: Hyper-realistic cityscape Description: Create an image of a bustling, vibrant New York City scene, with skyscrapers and bustling streets. Show a clear, crisp blue sky overhead, with a glowing sun. Capture the sense of improved air quality with people walking around, visibly invigorated and energized. Depict the atmosphere with bright colors, showcasing the renewed sense of liveliness in the air. In contrast, create a separate section of the image to depict the Australian electricity generation plants in a remote, industrial setting. Show them radiating an intense, unexplained surge of energy, with exaggerated, glowing power lines and surging electricity. The plants should appear to be basking in an intense, almost otherworldly light, emphasizing the sudden and mysterious spike in energy output. Combine the two scenes in a single cohesive visual narrative, conveying the contrast between the revitalized city and the surging, electrically charged industrial setting. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air quality in New York City and Electricity generation in Australia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: inspired by bauhaus A photo-realistic image Photorealism Minimalism Glitch art
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air quality in New York City and Electricity generation in Australia, in the following situation: The cleaner air in NYC led to residents having more energy, which somehow traveled all the way to Australia, sparking a surge in electricity generation as a byproduct of this transcontinental transfer of pep and vigor. As New Yorkers took in that pristine city air, they unwittingly became like urban, energy-boosting, power plants, and Australia was left wondering why they suddenly had an electrifying influx of wattage!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the heart of New York City, the air quality index shows a significant improvement, with residents seen walking around with more pep in their step and a renewed sense of energy. As they take deep breaths of the fresh, clean air, a pulsating wave of liveliness is visibly emanating from the bustling city. Meanwhile, on the other side of the world in Australia, the electricity generation plants are suddenly ablaze with unprecedented energy output, as if they've been infused with an inexplicable surge of power. The connection between the two events remains a mystery, leaving Australians to ponder the sudden surge in electricity generation.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In the heart of New York City, the air quality index shows a significant improvement, with residents seen walking around with more pep in their step and a renewed sense of energy. As they take deep breaths of the fresh, clean air, a pulsating wave of liveliness is visibly emanating from the bustling city. Meanwhile, on the other side of the world in Australia, the electricity generation plants are suddenly ablaze with unprecedented energy output, as if they've been infused with an inexplicable surge of power. The connection between the two events remains a mystery, leaving Australians to ponder the sudden surge in electricity generation. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Style: Hyper-realistic cityscape Description: Create an image of a bustling, vibrant New York City scene, with skyscrapers and bustling streets. Show a clear, crisp blue sky overhead, with a glowing sun. Capture the sense of improved air quality with people walking around, visibly invigorated and energized. Depict the atmosphere with bright colors, showcasing the renewed sense of liveliness in the air. In contrast, create a separate section of the image to depict the Australian electricity generation plants in a remote, industrial setting. Show them radiating an intense, unexplained surge of energy, with exaggerated, glowing power lines and surging electricity. The plants should appear to be basking in an intense, almost otherworldly light, emphasizing the sudden and mysterious spike in energy output. Combine the two scenes in a single cohesive visual narrative, conveying the contrast between the revitalized city and the surging, electrically charged industrial setting.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air quality in New York City caused Electricity generation in Australia to increase.
AI academic paper
Electrifying Connections: The Shocking Link Between Air Quality in New York City and Electricity Generation in Australia Journal of Transcontinental Environmental Studies Jan 2024 |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in New York City and Electricity generation in Australia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Make the title a clever pun.
Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9251358 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Electrifying Connections: The Shocking Link Between Air Quality in New York City and Electricity Generation in Australia
[[ABSTRACT]]
This electrifying research paper investigates the surprising connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia. Despite the seemingly vast geographical and cultural differences between these two regions, our study reveals a striking correlation that may just leave you breathless.
Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration, our research team set out to answer this electrically charged question. We found a positively shocking correlation coefficient of 0.9251358 and a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning from the year 1980 to 2021. The strength of this correlation highlights a noteworthy relationship that is nothing short of electrifying.
Now, let's address the elephant in the room - or rather, the koala in the power plant. It seems that the relationship between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia is not as far-fetched as one might think. In fact, it's quite current, to say the least. And if you think this correlation is simply a "down under" chance occurrence, you might need to re-volt your thinking!
In conclusion, our findings highlight a captivating connection that sparks new avenues for future research. So next time someone asks if there's a connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia, you can confidently reply, "It's all about current affairs!"
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in New York City and Electricity generation in Australia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Electrifying Connections: The Shocking Link Between Air Quality in New York City and Electricity Generation in Australia
[[ABSTRACT]]
This electrifying research paper investigates the surprising connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia. Despite the seemingly vast geographical and cultural differences between these two regions, our study reveals a striking correlation that may just leave you breathless.
Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration, our research team set out to answer this electrically charged question. We found a positively shocking correlation coefficient of 0.9251358 and a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning from the year 1980 to 2021. The strength of this correlation highlights a noteworthy relationship that is nothing short of electrifying.
Now, let's address the elephant in the room - or rather, the koala in the power plant. It seems that the relationship between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia is not as far-fetched as one might think. In fact, it's quite current, to say the least. And if you think this correlation is simply a "down under" chance occurrence, you might need to re-volt your thinking!
In conclusion, our findings highlight a captivating connection that sparks new avenues for future research. So next time someone asks if there's a connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia, you can confidently reply, "It's all about current affairs!"
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As Benjamin Franklin famously said, "In this world, nothing is certain except death, taxes, and the shocking connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia." Okay, maybe he didn't say the last part, but our research aims to shed light on this electrifying link that has left us positively charged with excitement.
The intercontinental buzz surrounding the correlation between air quality in the Big Apple and electricity generation down under has been generating a lot of static in the scientific community. Our study aims to clear the air and power through the misconceptions, illuminating the undeniable connection between these seemingly distant entities.
It's time to address the elephant in the room, or rather, the kangaroo at the power station. Why, you ask? Well, this research has revealed a direct current, or should we say, a direct koala-tion between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia. It's quite a "shocking" discovery indeed!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in New York City and Electricity generation in Australia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Electrifying Connections: The Shocking Link Between Air Quality in New York City and Electricity Generation in Australia
[[ABSTRACT]]
This electrifying research paper investigates the surprising connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia. Despite the seemingly vast geographical and cultural differences between these two regions, our study reveals a striking correlation that may just leave you breathless.
Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration, our research team set out to answer this electrically charged question. We found a positively shocking correlation coefficient of 0.9251358 and a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning from the year 1980 to 2021. The strength of this correlation highlights a noteworthy relationship that is nothing short of electrifying.
Now, let's address the elephant in the room - or rather, the koala in the power plant. It seems that the relationship between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia is not as far-fetched as one might think. In fact, it's quite current, to say the least. And if you think this correlation is simply a "down under" chance occurrence, you might need to re-volt your thinking!
In conclusion, our findings highlight a captivating connection that sparks new avenues for future research. So next time someone asks if there's a connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia, you can confidently reply, "It's all about current affairs!"
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As Benjamin Franklin famously said, "In this world, nothing is certain except death, taxes, and the shocking connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia." Okay, maybe he didn't say the last part, but our research aims to shed light on this electrifying link that has left us positively charged with excitement.
The intercontinental buzz surrounding the correlation between air quality in the Big Apple and electricity generation down under has been generating a lot of static in the scientific community. Our study aims to clear the air and power through the misconceptions, illuminating the undeniable connection between these seemingly distant entities.
It's time to address the elephant in the room, or rather, the kangaroo at the power station. Why, you ask? Well, this research has revealed a direct current, or should we say, a direct koala-tion between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia. It's quite a "shocking" discovery indeed!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Numerous studies have delved into the complex relationship between air quality and electricity generation, but few have dared to traverse the mighty oceans to explore the electrifying connection between New York City and Australia. Smith et al. (2015) examined the impact of air pollution on urban environments, while Doe and Jones (2018) focused on the intricacies of electricity generation and its environmental implications. However, none of these works ventured into the uncharted territory of transcontinental electrical revelations and airy puns.
In "Electricity and Society," the authors find that the demand for electricity is intricately linked to societal advancements, but little did they know that the demand for puns is just as shocking!
When it comes to air quality in New York City, "Air Pollution and Public Health" by Johnson et al. (2017) provides a comprehensive analysis of the environmental and health effects of air pollution. But did they consider the impact of electrifying discoveries on the overall comedic effect of their research?
Turning our attention to fictional works, "The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test" by Tom Wolfe seems to tackle the electric aspect of our research, but unfortunately, there are no mentions of kangaroos or koalas in the power stations down under.
In the land of children's cartoons, "The Magic School Bus" episode on electricity generation might seem like light-hearted viewing, but it fails to capture the electrifying thrill of uncovering unexpected connections between distant continents.
Now, let's address the elephant in the room - or rather, the koala in the power plant. It seems that the relationship between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia is not as far-fetched as one might think. In fact, it's quite current, to say the least. And if you think this correlation is simply a "down under" chance occurrence, you might need to re-volt your thinking!
In conclusion, our findings highlight a captivating connection that sparks new avenues for future research. So next time someone asks if there's a connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia, you can confidently reply, "It's all about current affairs!" And remember, when it comes to research, the current is always shocking!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in New York City and Electricity generation in Australia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Electrifying Connections: The Shocking Link Between Air Quality in New York City and Electricity Generation in Australia
[[ABSTRACT]]
This electrifying research paper investigates the surprising connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia. Despite the seemingly vast geographical and cultural differences between these two regions, our study reveals a striking correlation that may just leave you breathless.
Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration, our research team set out to answer this electrically charged question. We found a positively shocking correlation coefficient of 0.9251358 and a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning from the year 1980 to 2021. The strength of this correlation highlights a noteworthy relationship that is nothing short of electrifying.
Now, let's address the elephant in the room - or rather, the koala in the power plant. It seems that the relationship between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia is not as far-fetched as one might think. In fact, it's quite current, to say the least. And if you think this correlation is simply a "down under" chance occurrence, you might need to re-volt your thinking!
In conclusion, our findings highlight a captivating connection that sparks new avenues for future research. So next time someone asks if there's a connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia, you can confidently reply, "It's all about current affairs!"
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As Benjamin Franklin famously said, "In this world, nothing is certain except death, taxes, and the shocking connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia." Okay, maybe he didn't say the last part, but our research aims to shed light on this electrifying link that has left us positively charged with excitement.
The intercontinental buzz surrounding the correlation between air quality in the Big Apple and electricity generation down under has been generating a lot of static in the scientific community. Our study aims to clear the air and power through the misconceptions, illuminating the undeniable connection between these seemingly distant entities.
It's time to address the elephant in the room, or rather, the kangaroo at the power station. Why, you ask? Well, this research has revealed a direct current, or should we say, a direct koala-tion between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia. It's quite a "shocking" discovery indeed!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To zap away any doubts about our research, our methodology was as meticulous as a newly calibrated voltage meter. We harnessed the power of data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA) to conduct our analysis. These data were collected from the year 1980 to 2021, allowing us to cover a significant period and electrify our study with robust statistical power - guaranteed to amp up our findings!
First, we charged up our research team by enlightening them on the importance of thorough data analysis. We then enlisted the help of statistical software, which we affectionately named "Ohm-my-gosh, That's a Lot of Numbers" (OMGTALON), to generate the correlation coefficients and conduct the statistical tests. We made sure to keep a close eye on our power consumption, as we didn't want to blow a fuse with any faulty analysis, 'cause that would really be a shocking experience!
To illuminate the connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia, we employed a cross-continental comparative analysis, strapping on our academically approved "electricity-goggles" to ensure we had a clear view of the data landscape. With a shocking amount of dedication, we delved deep into the metrics, jolting any erroneous data points and ensuring our results were as clean and pure as freshly generated electricity.
In the spirit of scientific transparency, we put our findings through a rigorous peer review process, inviting esteemed colleagues to scrutinize our methodology and results. We made sure they were well-grounded in the scientific principles of causality, ruling out any glaring mismatches and affirming the authenticity of our "watt"-er-tight methodology.
To ensure our research was both "electrifying" and enlightening, we employed a robust suite of analytical tools and techniques, making sure to steer clear of any "shortcut circuits" that could have led us astray. We confidently present our methodology as a shining beacon of reliability, grounded in the sound principles of scientific inquiry, and not just a "shocking" series of experiments conducted by a bunch of over-caffeinated researchers!
And speaking of "shocking," did you hear about the electrician who became a magician? He would always "volt" in unexpected places!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in New York City and Electricity generation in Australia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .
For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9251358, r-squared of 0.8558762, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Electrifying Connections: The Shocking Link Between Air Quality in New York City and Electricity Generation in Australia
[[ABSTRACT]]
This electrifying research paper investigates the surprising connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia. Despite the seemingly vast geographical and cultural differences between these two regions, our study reveals a striking correlation that may just leave you breathless.
Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration, our research team set out to answer this electrically charged question. We found a positively shocking correlation coefficient of 0.9251358 and a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning from the year 1980 to 2021. The strength of this correlation highlights a noteworthy relationship that is nothing short of electrifying.
Now, let's address the elephant in the room - or rather, the koala in the power plant. It seems that the relationship between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia is not as far-fetched as one might think. In fact, it's quite current, to say the least. And if you think this correlation is simply a "down under" chance occurrence, you might need to re-volt your thinking!
In conclusion, our findings highlight a captivating connection that sparks new avenues for future research. So next time someone asks if there's a connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia, you can confidently reply, "It's all about current affairs!"
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As Benjamin Franklin famously said, "In this world, nothing is certain except death, taxes, and the shocking connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia." Okay, maybe he didn't say the last part, but our research aims to shed light on this electrifying link that has left us positively charged with excitement.
The intercontinental buzz surrounding the correlation between air quality in the Big Apple and electricity generation down under has been generating a lot of static in the scientific community. Our study aims to clear the air and power through the misconceptions, illuminating the undeniable connection between these seemingly distant entities.
It's time to address the elephant in the room, or rather, the kangaroo at the power station. Why, you ask? Well, this research has revealed a direct current, or should we say, a direct koala-tion between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia. It's quite a "shocking" discovery indeed!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration revealed a positively shocking correlation coefficient of 0.9251358 between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia. This high correlation suggests that as air quality in New York City improved, electricity generation in Australia also experienced a positive trend. It's almost as if they were sending positive ions across the ocean!
The calculated r-squared value of 0.8558762 further emphasizes the strength of the relationship between these two variables. This value indicates that approximately 85.6% of the variation in electricity generation in Australia can be explained by changes in air quality in New York City. It seems that the air we breathe in the concrete jungle has more of an impact on the Land Down Under than we previously thought!
Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation is not due to random chance. In other words, the likelihood of this correlation occurring by fluke is less than finding a needle in a haystack. It's safe to say that this connection is far from being a mere "g'day" coincidence!
The striking correlation is graphically represented in Figure 1, a scatterplot that visually captures the strong positive relationship between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia. This electrifying figure is sure to spark further interest in the surprising link between these two seemingly disparate variables. And if you thought electricity and air quality weren't meant to be watt-her, think again!
In conclusion, the results of this study illuminate a captivating connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia. This unexpected finding opens up a power grid of possibilities for future research and reinforces the notion that in the world of environmental science, there's a shocking twist waiting to be discovered around every corner. It's electrifying, isn't it?
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in New York City and Electricity generation in Australia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Electrifying Connections: The Shocking Link Between Air Quality in New York City and Electricity Generation in Australia
[[ABSTRACT]]
This electrifying research paper investigates the surprising connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia. Despite the seemingly vast geographical and cultural differences between these two regions, our study reveals a striking correlation that may just leave you breathless.
Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration, our research team set out to answer this electrically charged question. We found a positively shocking correlation coefficient of 0.9251358 and a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning from the year 1980 to 2021. The strength of this correlation highlights a noteworthy relationship that is nothing short of electrifying.
Now, let's address the elephant in the room - or rather, the koala in the power plant. It seems that the relationship between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia is not as far-fetched as one might think. In fact, it's quite current, to say the least. And if you think this correlation is simply a "down under" chance occurrence, you might need to re-volt your thinking!
In conclusion, our findings highlight a captivating connection that sparks new avenues for future research. So next time someone asks if there's a connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia, you can confidently reply, "It's all about current affairs!"
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Numerous studies have delved into the complex relationship between air quality and electricity generation, but few have dared to traverse the mighty oceans to explore the electrifying connection between New York City and Australia. Smith et al. (2015) examined the impact of air pollution on urban environments, while Doe and Jones (2018) focused on the intricacies of electricity generation and its environmental implications. However, none of these works ventured into the uncharted territory of transcontinental electrical revelations and airy puns.
In "Electricity and Society," the authors find that the demand for electricity is intricately linked to societal advancements, but little did they know that the demand for puns is just as shocking!
When it comes to air quality in New York City, "Air Pollution and Public Health" by Johnson et al. (2017) provides a comprehensive analysis of the environmental and health effects of air pollution. But did they consider the impact of electrifying discoveries on the overall comedic effect of their research?
Turning our attention to fictional works, "The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test" by Tom Wolfe seems to tackle the electric aspect of our research, but unfortunately, there are no mentions of kangaroos or koalas in the power stations down under.
In the land of children's cartoons, "The Magic School Bus" episode on electricity generation might seem like light-hearted viewing, but it fails to capture the electrifying thrill of uncovering unexpected connections between distant continents.
Now, let's address the elephant in the room - or rather, the koala in the power plant. It seems that the relationship between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia is not as far-fetched as one might think. In fact, it's quite current, to say the least. And if you think this correlation is simply a "down under" chance occurrence, you might need to re-volt your thinking!
In conclusion, our findings highlight a captivating connection that sparks new avenues for future research. So next time someone asks if there's a connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia, you can confidently reply, "It's all about current affairs!" And remember, when it comes to research, the current is always shocking!
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration revealed a positively shocking correlation coefficient of 0.9251358 between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia. This high correlation suggests that as air quality in New York City improved, electricity generation in Australia also experienced a positive trend. It's almost as if they were sending positive ions across the ocean!
The calculated r-squared value of 0.8558762 further emphasizes the strength of the relationship between these two variables. This value indicates that approximately 85.6% of the variation in electricity generation in Australia can be explained by changes in air quality in New York City. It seems that the air we breathe in the concrete jungle has more of an impact on the Land Down Under than we previously thought!
Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation is not due to random chance. In other words, the likelihood of this correlation occurring by fluke is less than finding a needle in a haystack. It's safe to say that this connection is far from being a mere "g'day" coincidence!
The striking correlation is graphically represented in Figure 1, a scatterplot that visually captures the strong positive relationship between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia. This electrifying figure is sure to spark further interest in the surprising link between these two seemingly disparate variables. And if you thought electricity and air quality weren't meant to be watt-her, think again!
In conclusion, the results of this study illuminate a captivating connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia. This unexpected finding opens up a power grid of possibilities for future research and reinforces the notion that in the world of environmental science, there's a shocking twist waiting to be discovered around every corner. It's electrifying, isn't it?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our findings have shed light on the captivating connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia, a relationship that may just leave you electrified. Our results not only support the existing literature on air quality and electricity generation but also provide a jolt of insight into the potential cross-continental impacts of environmental factors on energy production.
The positively shocking correlation coefficient of 0.9251358 revealed in our study echoes the work of Smith et al. (2015), who also emphasized the significant impact of air pollution on urban environments. It seems that the effects of air quality transcends geographical barriers, creating an electrifying exchange of influences across the globe. It's as if the air quality in New York City is sending positive vibes all the way to the Land Down Under!
Moreover, the calculated r-squared value of 0.8558762 further emphasizes the strength of the relationship between these two variables. This finding is in line with the work of Doe and Jones (2018), who highlighted the intricate link between electricity generation and environmental factors. Our results indicate that approximately 85.6% of the variation in electricity generation in Australia can be illuminated by changes in air quality in New York City. It appears that the air we breathe in the big apple has a striking impact on the electricity being generated thousands of miles away. Shocking, isn't it?
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, aligning with earlier research that highlighted the statistical significance of the relationship between air quality and electricity generation. This result is anything but a "g'day" coincidence – it establishes a robust foundation for the unexpected link we've uncovered, one that is more electrifying than a power surge in a thunderstorm!
The graphically represented striking correlation in Figure 1 not only visually captures the strong positive relationship between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia but also adds an element of visual shock, akin to realizing you forgot to switch off the lights before leaving the house.
In conclusion, our study supports previous research while introducing an electrifying twist that opens up new implications for energy and environmental policymakers. It seems that the air quality in New York City and the electricity generation in Australia are not just "current affairs" but are deeply electrified in an unexpected transcontinental dance of influence. This discovery sparks new avenues for future research and reinforces the notion that in the world of environmental science, there's an electrifying twist around every corner. And remember, in the realm of air quality and electricity generation, the current always flows – sometimes even under the sea!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in New York City and Electricity generation in Australia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Electrifying Connections: The Shocking Link Between Air Quality in New York City and Electricity Generation in Australia
[[ABSTRACT]]
This electrifying research paper investigates the surprising connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia. Despite the seemingly vast geographical and cultural differences between these two regions, our study reveals a striking correlation that may just leave you breathless.
Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration, our research team set out to answer this electrically charged question. We found a positively shocking correlation coefficient of 0.9251358 and a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning from the year 1980 to 2021. The strength of this correlation highlights a noteworthy relationship that is nothing short of electrifying.
Now, let's address the elephant in the room - or rather, the koala in the power plant. It seems that the relationship between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia is not as far-fetched as one might think. In fact, it's quite current, to say the least. And if you think this correlation is simply a "down under" chance occurrence, you might need to re-volt your thinking!
In conclusion, our findings highlight a captivating connection that sparks new avenues for future research. So next time someone asks if there's a connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia, you can confidently reply, "It's all about current affairs!"
[[INTRDUCTION]]
As Benjamin Franklin famously said, "In this world, nothing is certain except death, taxes, and the shocking connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia." Okay, maybe he didn't say the last part, but our research aims to shed light on this electrifying link that has left us positively charged with excitement.
The intercontinental buzz surrounding the correlation between air quality in the Big Apple and electricity generation down under has been generating a lot of static in the scientific community. Our study aims to clear the air and power through the misconceptions, illuminating the undeniable connection between these seemingly distant entities.
It's time to address the elephant in the room, or rather, the kangaroo at the power station. Why, you ask? Well, this research has revealed a direct current, or should we say, a direct koala-tion between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia. It's quite a "shocking" discovery indeed!
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration revealed a positively shocking correlation coefficient of 0.9251358 between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia. This high correlation suggests that as air quality in New York City improved, electricity generation in Australia also experienced a positive trend. It's almost as if they were sending positive ions across the ocean!
The calculated r-squared value of 0.8558762 further emphasizes the strength of the relationship between these two variables. This value indicates that approximately 85.6% of the variation in electricity generation in Australia can be explained by changes in air quality in New York City. It seems that the air we breathe in the concrete jungle has more of an impact on the Land Down Under than we previously thought!
Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation is not due to random chance. In other words, the likelihood of this correlation occurring by fluke is less than finding a needle in a haystack. It's safe to say that this connection is far from being a mere "g'day" coincidence!
The striking correlation is graphically represented in Figure 1, a scatterplot that visually captures the strong positive relationship between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia. This electrifying figure is sure to spark further interest in the surprising link between these two seemingly disparate variables. And if you thought electricity and air quality weren't meant to be watt-her, think again!
In conclusion, the results of this study illuminate a captivating connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia. This unexpected finding opens up a power grid of possibilities for future research and reinforces the notion that in the world of environmental science, there's a shocking twist waiting to be discovered around every corner. It's electrifying, isn't it?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our research has left us positively charged with the discovery of a significant correlation between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia. This electrifying relationship dispels any notion of a mere coincidence and highlights a current affair that cannot be ignored. It seems the air in the concrete jungle really does have an impact on the Land Down Under! After all, who knew the concrete jungle and the outback could be so "watt" connected?
Our findings provide a shockingly clear picture of the influence of air quality in one region on electricity generation in another, highlighting the interconnectedness of our world in an unexpected way. As electric as these results may be, we believe there's no need to "amp" up further research in this area. It seems we've already sparked enough interest!
So next time someone questions the link between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia, you can confidently respond, "It's all about current affairs!" It's a "positive" way to end the discussion, don't you think?
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Electrifying Connections: The Shocking Link Between Air Quality in New York City and Electricity Generation in Australia. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
Journal of Transcontinental Environmental Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Electrifying Connections: The Shocking Link Between Air Quality in New York City and Electricity Generation in Australia. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
Institute for Global Environmental Collaborations and Curiosities
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Electrifying Connections: The Shocking Link Between Air Quality in New York City and Electricity Generation in Australia with an abstract of This electrifying research paper investigates the surprising connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia. Despite the seemingly vast geographical and cultural differences between these two regions, our study reveals a striking correlation that may just leave you breathless.
Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration, our research team set out to answer this electrically charged question. We found a positively shocking correlation coefficient of 0.9251358 and a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning from the year 1980 to 2021. The strength of this correlation highlights a noteworthy relationship that is nothing short of electrifying.
Now, let's address the elephant in the room - or rather, the koala in the power plant. It seems that the relationship between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia is not as far-fetched as one might think. In fact, it's quite current, to say the least. And if you think this correlation is simply a "down under" chance occurrence, you might need to re-volt your thinking!
In conclusion, our findings highlight a captivating connection that sparks new avenues for future research. So next time someone asks if there's a connection between air quality in New York City and electricity generation in Australia, you can confidently reply, "It's all about current affairs!
ChatGPT:
air quality, New York City, electricity generation, Australia, correlation coefficient, p-value, Environmental Protection Agency, Energy Information Administration, research, relationship, current affairs
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Air quality in New York CityDetailed data title: Percentage of days with good or moderate air quality in New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in New York City
Electricity generation in Australia
Detailed data title: Total electricity generation in Australia in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Electricity generation in Australia
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8558762 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Electricity generation in Australia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air quality in New York City) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.02E-18. 0.0000000000000000020182605612
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 2.02E-16% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 495,476,163,595,759,232 random variables You don't actually need 495 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.86, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1980 | 1981 | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1985 | 1986 | 1987 | 1988 | 1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
Air quality in New York City (Good air quality) | 54.0984 | 58.3562 | 58.3562 | 58.3562 | 52.7322 | 47.9452 | 55.8904 | 59.1781 | 68.5792 | 69.863 | 75.6164 | 70.9589 | 83.0601 | 76.9863 | 76.7123 | 80.274 | 81.694 | 82.1918 | 77.8082 | 77.2603 | 82.2404 | 75.6164 | 76.4384 | 83.2877 | 86.0656 | 80.5479 | 82.1918 | 81.9178 | 85.7924 | 90.411 | 83.2877 | 90.9589 | 89.3443 | 94.2466 | 95.6164 | 89.589 | 91.8033 | 94.7945 | 92.6027 | 95.6164 | 96.9945 | 94.2466 |
Electricity generation in Australia (Billion kWh) | 87.393 | 92.911 | 96.736 | 98.048 | 103.716 | 110.425 | 116.272 | 121.915 | 130.92 | 139.221 | 146.187 | 148.367 | 150.759 | 154.646 | 158.368 | 163.841 | 168.068 | 173.354 | 185.41 | 191.63 | 197.95 | 211.522 | 214.623 | 213.541 | 222.987 | 215.489 | 219.831 | 229.392 | 229.451 | 234.717 | 233.59 | 240.803 | 233.296 | 229.876 | 241.555 | 230.764 | 245.875 | 249.739 | 250.23 | 249.595 | 250.658 | 246.786 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([54.0984,58.3562,58.3562,58.3562,52.7322,47.9452,55.8904,59.1781,68.5792,69.863,75.6164,70.9589,83.0601,76.9863,76.7123,80.274,81.694,82.1918,77.8082,77.2603,82.2404,75.6164,76.4384,83.2877,86.0656,80.5479,82.1918,81.9178,85.7924,90.411,83.2877,90.9589,89.3443,94.2466,95.6164,89.589,91.8033,94.7945,92.6027,95.6164,96.9945,94.2466,])
array_2 = np.array([87.393,92.911,96.736,98.048,103.716,110.425,116.272,121.915,130.92,139.221,146.187,148.367,150.759,154.646,158.368,163.841,168.068,173.354,185.41,191.63,197.95,211.522,214.623,213.541,222.987,215.489,219.831,229.392,229.451,234.717,233.59,240.803,233.296,229.876,241.555,230.764,245.875,249.739,250.23,249.595,250.658,246.786,])
array_1_name = "Air quality in New York City"
array_2_name = "Electricity generation in Australia"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Air quality in New York City
- Line chart for only Electricity generation in Australia
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Electrifying Connections: The Shocking Link Between Air Quality in New York City and Electricity Generation in Australia
Your correlation rating is out of this world!
Correlation ID: 4307 · Black Variable ID: 20978 · Red Variable ID: 23470