Report an error
Air quality in New York City correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Electricity generation in Australia | r=0.93 | 42yrs | Yes! |
Biomass power generated in United States | r=0.92 | 42yrs | No |
Hydopower energy generated in Brazil | r=0.91 | 42yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Japan | r=0.89 | 42yrs | No |
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in New York | r=0.87 | 11yrs | No |
The number of actuaries in New York | r=0.84 | 20yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.84 | 43yrs | Yes! |
Hydopower energy generated in Norway | r=0.8 | 42yrs | No |
Air quality in New York City also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)