about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,269 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Bachelor's degrees awarded in Legal professions and the second variable is Air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of legal professionals in Somerset, Kentucky has risen, so has the demand for paperwork. This surge in paperwork production has led to a higher rate of document shredding in the area. Interestingly, the shredded paper is being repurposed as a fuel source for local power plants, leading to a significant decrease in traditional fuel usage. However, the unexpected consequence of this eco-friendly initiative is a notable increase in air pollution, as the combustion of shredded paper releases a unique blend of legal jargon and courtroom rhetoric into the atmosphere. It seems that in Somerset, even the fight for cleaner air is caught up in a legal battle of its own! The verdict is in: the connection between legal studies and air pollution may just be the most 'brief'-ly amusing correlation yet!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Create an image in the style inspired by bauhaus that depicts a surreal scene of a power plant in Somerset, Kentucky. In the foreground, show legal professionals busily shredding paperwork, with the shredded paper being transported by conveyor belts. The paper is being fed into the power plant's furnace, where it is being combusted, emitting billowing clouds of smoke with colorful, abstract representations of legal jargon and courtroom rhetoric. The power plant is juxtaposed against a vibrant, geometric landscape, alluding to the eco-friendly initiative of using shredded paper as a fuel source. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Bachelor's degrees awarded in Legal professions and studies and Air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Photorealism a Polaroid photo Glitch art Cute 2D animation inspired by bauhaus
ChatGPT: inspired by bauhaus

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Bachelor's degrees awarded in Legal professions and studies and Air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky, in the following situation: As the number of legal professionals in Somerset, Kentucky has risen, so has the demand for paperwork. This surge in paperwork production has led to a higher rate of document shredding in the area. Interestingly, the shredded paper is being repurposed as a fuel source for local power plants, leading to a significant decrease in traditional fuel usage. However, the unexpected consequence of this eco-friendly initiative is a notable increase in air pollution, as the combustion of shredded paper releases a unique blend of legal jargon and courtroom rhetoric into the atmosphere. It seems that in Somerset, even the fight for cleaner air is caught up in a legal battle of its own! The verdict is in: the connection between legal studies and air pollution may just be the most 'brief'-ly amusing correlation yet!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Somerset, Kentucky, as the number of legal professionals has increased, so has the demand for paperwork. Paper shredding has become a common sight, with shredded paper being repurposed as a fuel source for local power plants. This eco-friendly initiative has reduced traditional fuel usage, but it has also led to a noticeable increase in air pollution. The combustion of shredded paper releases a unique blend of legal jargon and courtroom rhetoric into the atmosphere, creating a quirky connection between legal studies and air pollution.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ inspired by bauhaus ] and depicting this scene: In Somerset, Kentucky, as the number of legal professionals has increased, so has the demand for paperwork. Paper shredding has become a common sight, with shredded paper being repurposed as a fuel source for local power plants. This eco-friendly initiative has reduced traditional fuel usage, but it has also led to a noticeable increase in air pollution. The combustion of shredded paper releases a unique blend of legal jargon and courtroom rhetoric into the atmosphere, creating a quirky connection between legal studies and air pollution. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Create an image in the style inspired by bauhaus that depicts a surreal scene of a power plant in Somerset, Kentucky. In the foreground, show legal professionals busily shredding paperwork, with the shredded paper being transported by conveyor belts. The paper is being fed into the power plant's furnace, where it is being combusted, emitting billowing clouds of smoke with colorful, abstract representations of legal jargon and courtroom rhetoric. The power plant is juxtaposed against a vibrant, geometric landscape, alluding to the eco-friendly initiative of using shredded paper as a fuel source.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Bachelor's degrees awarded in Legal professions and studies positively influenced Air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Legal Degrees: Clearing the Air in Somerset, Kentucky

The Journal of Southern Legal Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Legal professions and Air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8546571 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Legal Degrees: Clearing the Air in Somerset, Kentucky"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the perplexing correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in legal professions and levels of air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team delved into this peculiar association. Through meticulous statistical analysis, we identified a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8546571 and a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2012 to 2021. Our findings shed light on the unexpected relationship between legal education and environmental quality, providing a breath of fresh air in the field of interdisciplinary research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Legal professions and Air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Legal Degrees: Clearing the Air in Somerset, Kentucky"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the perplexing correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in legal professions and levels of air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team delved into this peculiar association. Through meticulous statistical analysis, we identified a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8546571 and a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2012 to 2021. Our findings shed light on the unexpected relationship between legal education and environmental quality, providing a breath of fresh air in the field of interdisciplinary research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Legal education and air pollution may seem like an odd couple at first glance, much like a mismatched pair of socks found at the back of a drawer. Yet, as with many unexpected duos, there could be a deeper connection waiting to be unearthed. In the case of Somerset, Kentucky, the intertwining tale of legal degrees and atmospheric pollutants unfolds in a manner that demands scholarly scrutiny.

On one hand, legal professions embody the pursuit of justice, the upholding of laws, and the quest for equity. Conversely, air pollution conjures images of industrial emissions, vehicular exhaust, and perhaps the occasional cloud of confetti from a lively parade gone awry. But could these seemingly distant realms of human activity be more interconnected than meets the eye?

The aim of this research endeavor is to unravel the enigmatic link between the conferral of Bachelor's degrees in legal professions and the levels of air pollution muddying the pristine skies of Somerset, Kentucky. This quest for understanding embodies the spirit of exploration; much like intrepid sailors of old charting new territories, we delve into uncharted waters – or rather, unfiltered air – seeking to unravel the mysteries that lie beneath the surface (or should we say "smoggy veil"?).

The setting of Somerset, Kentucky, with its rolling hills and picturesque landscapes, provides an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. It is a place where legal minds are honed and air particles drift lazily in the breeze, creating an unusual juxtaposition that piques the curiosity of discerning scholars. Furthermore, the peculiar nature of this locale invites us to ponder whether there may be other hidden connections waiting to be discovered, much like finding an unexpected dollar bill in a forgotten coat pocket.

In this paper, we embark on a journey to elucidate this unexpected correlation through a rigorous examination of data spanning the years 2012 to 2021. By employing robust statistical methods, we aim to shed light on this curiously intertwined tale of jurisprudence and environmental quality. Through our investigation, we seek to provide a breath of fresh air in the world of interdisciplinary research, offering new perspectives that may challenge conventional wisdom – or at the very least, offer an unconventional anecdote at the next academic mixer.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Legal professions and Air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Legal Degrees: Clearing the Air in Somerset, Kentucky"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the perplexing correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in legal professions and levels of air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team delved into this peculiar association. Through meticulous statistical analysis, we identified a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8546571 and a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2012 to 2021. Our findings shed light on the unexpected relationship between legal education and environmental quality, providing a breath of fresh air in the field of interdisciplinary research.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Legal education and air pollution may seem like an odd couple at first glance, much like a mismatched pair of socks found at the back of a drawer. Yet, as with many unexpected duos, there could be a deeper connection waiting to be unearthed. In the case of Somerset, Kentucky, the intertwining tale of legal degrees and atmospheric pollutants unfolds in a manner that demands scholarly scrutiny.
On one hand, legal professions embody the pursuit of justice, the upholding of laws, and the quest for equity. Conversely, air pollution conjures images of industrial emissions, vehicular exhaust, and perhaps the occasional cloud of confetti from a lively parade gone awry. But could these seemingly distant realms of human activity be more interconnected than meets the eye?
The aim of this research endeavor is to unravel the enigmatic link between the conferral of Bachelor's degrees in legal professions and the levels of air pollution muddying the pristine skies of Somerset, Kentucky. This quest for understanding embodies the spirit of exploration; much like intrepid sailors of old charting new territories, we delve into uncharted waters – or rather, unfiltered air – seeking to unravel the mysteries that lie beneath the surface (or should we say "smoggy veil"?).
The setting of Somerset, Kentucky, with its rolling hills and picturesque landscapes, provides an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. It is a place where legal minds are honed and air particles drift lazily in the breeze, creating an unusual juxtaposition that piques the curiosity of discerning scholars. Furthermore, the peculiar nature of this locale invites us to ponder whether there may be other hidden connections waiting to be discovered, much like finding an unexpected dollar bill in a forgotten coat pocket.
In this paper, we embark on a journey to elucidate this unexpected correlation through a rigorous examination of data spanning the years 2012 to 2021. By employing robust statistical methods, we aim to shed light on this curiously intertwined tale of jurisprudence and environmental quality. Through our investigation, we seek to provide a breath of fresh air in the world of interdisciplinary research, offering new perspectives that may challenge conventional wisdom – or at the very least, offer an unconventional anecdote at the next academic mixer.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between educational attainment in legal professions and environmental quality is a topic that has attracted increasingly more attention from researchers in recent years. Initially, scholarly investigations by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe (2018) focused on the socio-economic implications of legal education, with little consideration for its potential impact on ambient air quality. However, as the field of interdisciplinary studies has expanded, a curious intersection between legal degrees and atmospheric pollutants has become the focus of both bemusement and intrigue.

In "Legal Eagles: An Examination of the Perspectives on Legal Education in the 21st Century," Smith et al. (2015) delved into the factors influencing the pursuit of legal careers, demonstrating the varied motivations and pathways that lead individuals to pursue degrees in jurisprudence. Although their research did not explicitly address environmental concerns, their findings laid a foundation for contemplating the larger societal ramifications of legal education. Meanwhile, Doe (2018) in "The Dynamics of Legal Education: Trends and Transformations" highlighted the evolving landscape of legal professions and the shifting demographics of legal students, offering valuable insights into the educational trajectories within this field.

Turning to the realm of non-fiction literature, works such as "Breathless: The Impact of Air Pollution on Public Health" by Jones (2019) and "The Legal Frontier: Navigating Environmental Regulations in the 21st Century" by Brown (2017) have provided invaluable perspectives on the individual components of our investigation. These monographs, albeit not directly addressing the peculiar juxtaposition of legal education and air pollution, contribute to a broader understanding of the contextual factors at play.

In exploring the potential connections between legal education and environmental conditions, it is imperative to consider fictional narratives that may offer tangential insights. The novel "A Breath of Justice" by Green (2018) weaves a compelling tale of legal triumphs amidst an atmospheric backdrop of environmental woes, inviting readers to ponder the interplay between the scales of justice and the weight of air pollution. Additionally, "The Smog of Law: A Legal Mystery" by White (2016) presents a whimsical yet thought-provoking narrative that artfully intertwines legal intrigue with the murkiness of environmental malfeasance.

Amidst the staid world of research literature and scholarly tomes, popular internet memes such as "The Air Quality Index: How It Feels to Study Law" have found a niche audience, humorously juxtaposing legal academia with atmospheric conditions. The meme "Legal Eagles vs. Air Particulates: A Battle of Epic Proportions" humorously underscores the unexpected intersection of legal prowess and air quality concerns, providing a lighthearted take on an otherwise weighty subject.

As we navigate the scholarly landscape surrounding legal degrees and air pollution, it becomes evident that this peculiar correlation encompasses a rich tapestry of academic inquiries, literary narratives, and comical anecdotes. Our endeavor to elucidate this enigmatic connection promises not just intellectual nourishment, but also the occasional chuckle amidst the pursuit of empirical knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Legal professions and Air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Legal Degrees: Clearing the Air in Somerset, Kentucky"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the perplexing correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in legal professions and levels of air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team delved into this peculiar association. Through meticulous statistical analysis, we identified a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8546571 and a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2012 to 2021. Our findings shed light on the unexpected relationship between legal education and environmental quality, providing a breath of fresh air in the field of interdisciplinary research.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Legal education and air pollution may seem like an odd couple at first glance, much like a mismatched pair of socks found at the back of a drawer. Yet, as with many unexpected duos, there could be a deeper connection waiting to be unearthed. In the case of Somerset, Kentucky, the intertwining tale of legal degrees and atmospheric pollutants unfolds in a manner that demands scholarly scrutiny.
On one hand, legal professions embody the pursuit of justice, the upholding of laws, and the quest for equity. Conversely, air pollution conjures images of industrial emissions, vehicular exhaust, and perhaps the occasional cloud of confetti from a lively parade gone awry. But could these seemingly distant realms of human activity be more interconnected than meets the eye?
The aim of this research endeavor is to unravel the enigmatic link between the conferral of Bachelor's degrees in legal professions and the levels of air pollution muddying the pristine skies of Somerset, Kentucky. This quest for understanding embodies the spirit of exploration; much like intrepid sailors of old charting new territories, we delve into uncharted waters – or rather, unfiltered air – seeking to unravel the mysteries that lie beneath the surface (or should we say "smoggy veil"?).
The setting of Somerset, Kentucky, with its rolling hills and picturesque landscapes, provides an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. It is a place where legal minds are honed and air particles drift lazily in the breeze, creating an unusual juxtaposition that piques the curiosity of discerning scholars. Furthermore, the peculiar nature of this locale invites us to ponder whether there may be other hidden connections waiting to be discovered, much like finding an unexpected dollar bill in a forgotten coat pocket.
In this paper, we embark on a journey to elucidate this unexpected correlation through a rigorous examination of data spanning the years 2012 to 2021. By employing robust statistical methods, we aim to shed light on this curiously intertwined tale of jurisprudence and environmental quality. Through our investigation, we seek to provide a breath of fresh air in the world of interdisciplinary research, offering new perspectives that may challenge conventional wisdom – or at the very least, offer an unconventional anecdote at the next academic mixer.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the perplexing relationship between Bachelor's degrees awarded in legal professions and air pollution levels in Somerset, Kentucky, our research team meticulously crafted a methodological approach that would rival the complexities of a legal brief. We utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics to ascertain the annual count of legal bachelor’s degrees conferred within the study period of 2012 to 2021. Concurrently, air quality data from the Environmental Protection Agency provided insight into the levels of atmospheric pollutants across the same timeframe.

The first step in our convoluted journey involved the utilization of Python scripting to aggregate and organize the staggering volume of data obtained from these sources. Like a shrewd legal counsel crafting a compelling argument, the manipulation of these datasets required a deft touch and an astute eye for detail. The resulting datasets were subjected to rigorous scrutiny and cleaning, akin to the thorough examination of evidence in a legal case, to ensure their reliability and integrity.

After this meticulous process of data preparation, we then embarked on a statistical quest of Herculean proportions. Employing the venerable tool of linear regression analysis, we sought to elucidate the relationship between the number of legal bachelor’s degrees awarded and levels of air pollution. This rigorous statistical technique allowed us to quantify the strength and direction of the association, much like a judge's gavel decisively ruling on the outcome of a trial.

To bolster our investigation, we gleefully indulged in the enthralling realm of hypothesis testing – a veritable courtroom drama unfolding in the world of statistics. Utilizing the trusty p-value as our barometer of statistical significance, we scrutinized the evidence with the tenacity of a seasoned attorney cross-examining a witness. The resulting findings were then subjected to critical evaluation, akin to the deliberation of a jury, to discern the meaningfulness and robustness of the observed relationship.

However, our investigation did not cease at mere correlation; we delved into the depths of time series analysis to capture the dynamic interplay between legal education and ambient air quality over the study period. With the tenacity of a legal scholar unearthing obscure case precedents, we sought to uncover temporal trends and patterns that could shed light on this enigmatic connection.

Despite the arcane complexity of our methodological odyssey, we remained vigilant in guarding against the pitfalls of spurious correlations and confounding variables. Our vigilant efforts aimed to ensure that the air of statistical rigor enveloped our every move, much like the solemn atmosphere of a courtroom during a momentous trial.

In summary, our methodological approach transcended the boundaries of conventional research, embracing the captivating complexities of both legal and statistical realms in pursuit of understanding the unexpected alliance between legal education and air pollution in the idyllic environs of Somerset, Kentucky.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Legal professions and Air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8546571, r-squared of 0.7304388, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Legal Degrees: Clearing the Air in Somerset, Kentucky"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the perplexing correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in legal professions and levels of air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team delved into this peculiar association. Through meticulous statistical analysis, we identified a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8546571 and a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2012 to 2021. Our findings shed light on the unexpected relationship between legal education and environmental quality, providing a breath of fresh air in the field of interdisciplinary research.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Legal education and air pollution may seem like an odd couple at first glance, much like a mismatched pair of socks found at the back of a drawer. Yet, as with many unexpected duos, there could be a deeper connection waiting to be unearthed. In the case of Somerset, Kentucky, the intertwining tale of legal degrees and atmospheric pollutants unfolds in a manner that demands scholarly scrutiny.
On one hand, legal professions embody the pursuit of justice, the upholding of laws, and the quest for equity. Conversely, air pollution conjures images of industrial emissions, vehicular exhaust, and perhaps the occasional cloud of confetti from a lively parade gone awry. But could these seemingly distant realms of human activity be more interconnected than meets the eye?
The aim of this research endeavor is to unravel the enigmatic link between the conferral of Bachelor's degrees in legal professions and the levels of air pollution muddying the pristine skies of Somerset, Kentucky. This quest for understanding embodies the spirit of exploration; much like intrepid sailors of old charting new territories, we delve into uncharted waters – or rather, unfiltered air – seeking to unravel the mysteries that lie beneath the surface (or should we say "smoggy veil"?).
The setting of Somerset, Kentucky, with its rolling hills and picturesque landscapes, provides an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. It is a place where legal minds are honed and air particles drift lazily in the breeze, creating an unusual juxtaposition that piques the curiosity of discerning scholars. Furthermore, the peculiar nature of this locale invites us to ponder whether there may be other hidden connections waiting to be discovered, much like finding an unexpected dollar bill in a forgotten coat pocket.
In this paper, we embark on a journey to elucidate this unexpected correlation through a rigorous examination of data spanning the years 2012 to 2021. By employing robust statistical methods, we aim to shed light on this curiously intertwined tale of jurisprudence and environmental quality. Through our investigation, we seek to provide a breath of fresh air in the world of interdisciplinary research, offering new perspectives that may challenge conventional wisdom – or at the very least, offer an unconventional anecdote at the next academic mixer.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The investigation into the association between the conferral of Bachelor's degrees in legal professions and ambient air pollution levels in Somerset, Kentucky yielded intriguing findings. The statistical analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8546571, indicative of a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This substantial correlation was further substantiated by the r-squared value of 0.7304388, suggesting that approximately 73.04% of the variability in air pollution levels can be explained by the number of legal degrees awarded. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence of the significance of this observed correlation.

The graphical representation of the data in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the robust nature of the connection between legal education and air quality. The scatterplot succinctly illustrates the consistent pattern of increasing air pollution levels aligning with higher numbers of legal degrees awarded, akin to the seemingly inevitable rise of balloons at a birthday party.

The implications of these findings are as thought-provoking as an unsolved legal case – the correlation suggests that as the number of legal degrees conferred in Somerset, Kentucky increased over the years, so did the levels of air pollution. It's as if the pursuit of legal knowledge was inadvertently accompanied by the wafting presence of environmental pollutants, creating an intriguing conundrum reminiscent of a legal paradox.

While these results may raise more questions than they answer, they undoubtedly highlight the need for further exploration of the complex interplay between educational attainment and environmental factors. This unexpected correlation between legal degrees and air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky underscores the intricate, interconnected tapestry of human activities and their environmental ramifications, challenging conventional boundaries much like a legal argument that pushes the limits of accepted jurisprudence.

In summary, our findings not only reveal an unanticipated relationship between legal education and air quality but also serve as a reminder of the multifaceted nature of societal influences on environmental dynamics. This research offers a fresh perspective on the nexus of legal education and environmental quality, inviting scholars to consider the intricate web of connections that underpins our interactions with the world around us – and perhaps to ponder the air quality implications of excessive legal briefs filling the atmospheric stratosphere.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Legal professions and Air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Legal Degrees: Clearing the Air in Somerset, Kentucky"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the perplexing correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in legal professions and levels of air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team delved into this peculiar association. Through meticulous statistical analysis, we identified a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8546571 and a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2012 to 2021. Our findings shed light on the unexpected relationship between legal education and environmental quality, providing a breath of fresh air in the field of interdisciplinary research.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between educational attainment in legal professions and environmental quality is a topic that has attracted increasingly more attention from researchers in recent years. Initially, scholarly investigations by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe (2018) focused on the socio-economic implications of legal education, with little consideration for its potential impact on ambient air quality. However, as the field of interdisciplinary studies has expanded, a curious intersection between legal degrees and atmospheric pollutants has become the focus of both bemusement and intrigue.
In "Legal Eagles: An Examination of the Perspectives on Legal Education in the 21st Century," Smith et al. (2015) delved into the factors influencing the pursuit of legal careers, demonstrating the varied motivations and pathways that lead individuals to pursue degrees in jurisprudence. Although their research did not explicitly address environmental concerns, their findings laid a foundation for contemplating the larger societal ramifications of legal education. Meanwhile, Doe (2018) in "The Dynamics of Legal Education: Trends and Transformations" highlighted the evolving landscape of legal professions and the shifting demographics of legal students, offering valuable insights into the educational trajectories within this field.
Turning to the realm of non-fiction literature, works such as "Breathless: The Impact of Air Pollution on Public Health" by Jones (2019) and "The Legal Frontier: Navigating Environmental Regulations in the 21st Century" by Brown (2017) have provided invaluable perspectives on the individual components of our investigation. These monographs, albeit not directly addressing the peculiar juxtaposition of legal education and air pollution, contribute to a broader understanding of the contextual factors at play.
In exploring the potential connections between legal education and environmental conditions, it is imperative to consider fictional narratives that may offer tangential insights. The novel "A Breath of Justice" by Green (2018) weaves a compelling tale of legal triumphs amidst an atmospheric backdrop of environmental woes, inviting readers to ponder the interplay between the scales of justice and the weight of air pollution. Additionally, "The Smog of Law: A Legal Mystery" by White (2016) presents a whimsical yet thought-provoking narrative that artfully intertwines legal intrigue with the murkiness of environmental malfeasance.
Amidst the staid world of research literature and scholarly tomes, popular internet memes such as "The Air Quality Index: How It Feels to Study Law" have found a niche audience, humorously juxtaposing legal academia with atmospheric conditions. The meme "Legal Eagles vs. Air Particulates: A Battle of Epic Proportions" humorously underscores the unexpected intersection of legal prowess and air quality concerns, providing a lighthearted take on an otherwise weighty subject.
As we navigate the scholarly landscape surrounding legal degrees and air pollution, it becomes evident that this peculiar correlation encompasses a rich tapestry of academic inquiries, literary narratives, and comical anecdotes. Our endeavor to elucidate this enigmatic connection promises not just intellectual nourishment, but also the occasional chuckle amidst the pursuit of empirical knowledge.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the association between the conferral of Bachelor's degrees in legal professions and ambient air pollution levels in Somerset, Kentucky yielded intriguing findings. The statistical analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8546571, indicative of a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This substantial correlation was further substantiated by the r-squared value of 0.7304388, suggesting that approximately 73.04% of the variability in air pollution levels can be explained by the number of legal degrees awarded. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence of the significance of this observed correlation.
The graphical representation of the data in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the robust nature of the connection between legal education and air quality. The scatterplot succinctly illustrates the consistent pattern of increasing air pollution levels aligning with higher numbers of legal degrees awarded, akin to the seemingly inevitable rise of balloons at a birthday party.
The implications of these findings are as thought-provoking as an unsolved legal case – the correlation suggests that as the number of legal degrees conferred in Somerset, Kentucky increased over the years, so did the levels of air pollution. It's as if the pursuit of legal knowledge was inadvertently accompanied by the wafting presence of environmental pollutants, creating an intriguing conundrum reminiscent of a legal paradox.
While these results may raise more questions than they answer, they undoubtedly highlight the need for further exploration of the complex interplay between educational attainment and environmental factors. This unexpected correlation between legal degrees and air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky underscores the intricate, interconnected tapestry of human activities and their environmental ramifications, challenging conventional boundaries much like a legal argument that pushes the limits of accepted jurisprudence.
In summary, our findings not only reveal an unanticipated relationship between legal education and air quality but also serve as a reminder of the multifaceted nature of societal influences on environmental dynamics. This research offers a fresh perspective on the nexus of legal education and environmental quality, inviting scholars to consider the intricate web of connections that underpins our interactions with the world around us – and perhaps to ponder the air quality implications of excessive legal briefs filling the atmospheric stratosphere.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The compelling correlation we unveiled between the conferral of Bachelor's degrees in legal professions and ambient air pollution levels in Somerset, Kentucky lays bare a thought-provoking conundrum, akin to an enigmatic legal case waiting to be unraveled. The robust statistical analysis revealed a remarkably strong positive relationship, aligning with the findings of prior research that ventured into the unlikely nexus of legal degrees and environmental conditions. The correlation coefficient of 0.8546571 and the r-squared value of 0.7304388 unequivocally bolster the burgeoning scholarship that seeks to comprehend the intricate interplay between legal education and atmospheric pollutants.

Echoing the whimsical musings of Green's "A Breath of Justice" and the comical yet insightful meme "Legal Eagles vs. Air Particulates: A Battle of Epic Proportions," we have unearthed an intriguing connection that prompts reflection on the potential ramifications of legal pursuit on environmental quality. This finding not only adds an unexpected twist to the fervent pursuit of legal knowledge but also underscores the intricate web of connections that govern our actions and their environmental repercussions.

While our results may seem as unlikely as the zany plot of a legal mystery novel, they urge further investigation into the uncharted territory of the intersection between legal education and environmental dynamics. Much like a legal argument that pushes the boundaries of accepted jurisprudence, our research challenges conventional boundaries and invites scholars to contemplate the multifaceted nature of societal influences on environmental phenomena.

Indeed, the unexpected correlation uncovered in Somerset, Kentucky serves as a reminder of the rich tapestry of academic inquiries, literary narratives, and the occasional chuckle amidst the pursuit of empirical knowledge that enlivens the scholarly landscape. As we continue our intellectual odyssey through the peculiar correlation between legal degrees and air pollution, the occasional whimsy and witticism may well accompany us on this journey, lending a bit of levity to an otherwise weighty subject.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Legal professions and Air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Legal Degrees: Clearing the Air in Somerset, Kentucky"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the perplexing correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in legal professions and levels of air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team delved into this peculiar association. Through meticulous statistical analysis, we identified a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8546571 and a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2012 to 2021. Our findings shed light on the unexpected relationship between legal education and environmental quality, providing a breath of fresh air in the field of interdisciplinary research.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Legal education and air pollution may seem like an odd couple at first glance, much like a mismatched pair of socks found at the back of a drawer. Yet, as with many unexpected duos, there could be a deeper connection waiting to be unearthed. In the case of Somerset, Kentucky, the intertwining tale of legal degrees and atmospheric pollutants unfolds in a manner that demands scholarly scrutiny.
On one hand, legal professions embody the pursuit of justice, the upholding of laws, and the quest for equity. Conversely, air pollution conjures images of industrial emissions, vehicular exhaust, and perhaps the occasional cloud of confetti from a lively parade gone awry. But could these seemingly distant realms of human activity be more interconnected than meets the eye?
The aim of this research endeavor is to unravel the enigmatic link between the conferral of Bachelor's degrees in legal professions and the levels of air pollution muddying the pristine skies of Somerset, Kentucky. This quest for understanding embodies the spirit of exploration; much like intrepid sailors of old charting new territories, we delve into uncharted waters – or rather, unfiltered air – seeking to unravel the mysteries that lie beneath the surface (or should we say "smoggy veil"?).
The setting of Somerset, Kentucky, with its rolling hills and picturesque landscapes, provides an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. It is a place where legal minds are honed and air particles drift lazily in the breeze, creating an unusual juxtaposition that piques the curiosity of discerning scholars. Furthermore, the peculiar nature of this locale invites us to ponder whether there may be other hidden connections waiting to be discovered, much like finding an unexpected dollar bill in a forgotten coat pocket.
In this paper, we embark on a journey to elucidate this unexpected correlation through a rigorous examination of data spanning the years 2012 to 2021. By employing robust statistical methods, we aim to shed light on this curiously intertwined tale of jurisprudence and environmental quality. Through our investigation, we seek to provide a breath of fresh air in the world of interdisciplinary research, offering new perspectives that may challenge conventional wisdom – or at the very least, offer an unconventional anecdote at the next academic mixer.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the association between the conferral of Bachelor's degrees in legal professions and ambient air pollution levels in Somerset, Kentucky yielded intriguing findings. The statistical analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8546571, indicative of a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This substantial correlation was further substantiated by the r-squared value of 0.7304388, suggesting that approximately 73.04% of the variability in air pollution levels can be explained by the number of legal degrees awarded. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence of the significance of this observed correlation.
The graphical representation of the data in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the robust nature of the connection between legal education and air quality. The scatterplot succinctly illustrates the consistent pattern of increasing air pollution levels aligning with higher numbers of legal degrees awarded, akin to the seemingly inevitable rise of balloons at a birthday party.
The implications of these findings are as thought-provoking as an unsolved legal case – the correlation suggests that as the number of legal degrees conferred in Somerset, Kentucky increased over the years, so did the levels of air pollution. It's as if the pursuit of legal knowledge was inadvertently accompanied by the wafting presence of environmental pollutants, creating an intriguing conundrum reminiscent of a legal paradox.
While these results may raise more questions than they answer, they undoubtedly highlight the need for further exploration of the complex interplay between educational attainment and environmental factors. This unexpected correlation between legal degrees and air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky underscores the intricate, interconnected tapestry of human activities and their environmental ramifications, challenging conventional boundaries much like a legal argument that pushes the limits of accepted jurisprudence.
In summary, our findings not only reveal an unanticipated relationship between legal education and air quality but also serve as a reminder of the multifaceted nature of societal influences on environmental dynamics. This research offers a fresh perspective on the nexus of legal education and environmental quality, inviting scholars to consider the intricate web of connections that underpins our interactions with the world around us – and perhaps to ponder the air quality implications of excessive legal briefs filling the atmospheric stratosphere.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation revealed a compelling correlation between the conferral of Bachelor's degrees in legal professions and ambient air pollution levels in Somerset, Kentucky. The robust statistical analysis unveiled a strong positive relationship, akin to the irrefutable bond between a gavel and its sounding block. The notable correlation coefficient of 0.8546571 and the convincingly low p-value underscore the significance of this unexpected association, much like stumbling upon a hidden clause in a legal contract.

The implications of our findings extend beyond the confines of traditional disciplinary boundaries, akin to an ambitious lawyer arguing a case in uncharted legal territory. The unanticipated intertwining of legal education and environmental quality serves as a poignant reminder of the intricate interplay of human endeavors and their ecological repercussions. Furthermore, the visual representation of our data in Fig. 1 provides a striking portrayal of the rise in air pollution levels mirroring the ascent of legal degrees, not unlike the balloons at a celebratory event – though in this case, the celebration may be for the completion of an environmental impact assessment.

While our results present a compelling narrative of the unexpected interdependence between legal education and atmospheric purity (or lack thereof), there are undoubtedly avenues for future exploration. However, given the surprising and compelling nature of our findings, it is the humble opinion of this research team that no further investigation in this area is necessary. The enigmatic relationship between legal degrees and air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky stands as a testament to the capricious nature of academic inquiry and the awe-inspiring peculiarity of the world around us.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Legal Degrees: Clearing the Air in Somerset, Kentucky. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Southern Legal Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Legal Degrees: Clearing the Air in Somerset, Kentucky. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Legal Education and Research (SOLER)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Legal Degrees: Clearing the Air in Somerset, Kentucky with an abstract of In this study, we examine the perplexing correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in legal professions and levels of air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team delved into this peculiar association. Through meticulous statistical analysis, we identified a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8546571 and a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2012 to 2021. Our findings shed light on the unexpected relationship between legal education and environmental quality, providing a breath of fresh air in the field of interdisciplinary research.

ChatGPT:

Somerset, Kentucky, legal degrees, air pollution, Bachelor's degrees, National Center for Education Statistics, Environmental Protection Agency, correlation coefficient, statistical analysis, p-value, 2012-2021, interdisciplinary research.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Bachelor's degrees awarded in Legal professions
Detailed data title: Bachelor's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, in field of study: Legal professions and studies
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Bachelor's degrees awarded in Legal professions

Air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Somerset, KY
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky

Correlation r = 0.8546571 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7304388 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 73% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Bachelor's degrees awarded in Legal professions) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0016. 0.0016320133675571489000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 0.16% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 613 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.49, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Legal professions (Degrees awarded)4595442545134420424342724242423542624589
Air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky (Bad air quality days)22.743711.578919.580412.547511.51087.4468113.82985.319156.3604218.5596




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4595,4425,4513,4420,4243,4272,4242,4235,4262,4589,])
array_2 = np.array([22.7437,11.5789,19.5804,12.5475,11.5108,7.44681,13.8298,5.31915,6.36042,18.5596,])
array_1_name = "Bachelor's degrees awarded in Legal professions"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Somerset, Kentucky"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 4269 · Black Variable ID: 1280 · Red Variable ID: 21270
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0