about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,217 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Arson in Massachusetts and the second variable is The number of telemarketers in Massachusetts.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the flames of arson decreased, so did the fiery passion for telemarketing, leading to a smoldering decrease in the number of telemarketers in Massachusetts. It seems even telemarketers couldn't handle the heat!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate a Polaroid photo of a quiet Massachusetts neighborhood with a smoldering building in the background, hinting at an arson attack. In the foreground, show the abandoned telemarketing office with empty cubicles and neglected equipment. The atmosphere should capture the aftermath of the fire and the sense of abandonment in the area. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Arson in Massachusetts and The number of telemarketers in Massachusetts. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: High-tech High-tech Pop art Oragami a Polaroid photo
ChatGPT: Polaroid photo

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Arson in Massachusetts and The number of telemarketers in Massachusetts, in the following situation: As the flames of arson decreased, so did the fiery passion for telemarketing, leading to a smoldering decrease in the number of telemarketers in Massachusetts. It seems even telemarketers couldn't handle the heat!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a quiet neighborhood in Massachusetts, the flames from an arson attack were slowly dying out, leaving charred remains behind. Nearby, a once-busy telemarketing office now stood abandoned, its fiery passion for cold calls extinguished. The decrease in arson seemed to have led to a smoldering decrease in the number of telemarketers in the state, with even the most determined salespeople unable to handle the heat.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Polaroid photo ] and depicting this scene: In a quiet neighborhood in Massachusetts, the flames from an arson attack were slowly dying out, leaving charred remains behind. Nearby, a once-busy telemarketing office now stood abandoned, its fiery passion for cold calls extinguished. The decrease in arson seemed to have led to a smoldering decrease in the number of telemarketers in the state, with even the most determined salespeople unable to handle the heat. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate a Polaroid photo of a quiet Massachusetts neighborhood with a smoldering building in the background, hinting at an arson attack. In the foreground, show the abandoned telemarketing office with empty cubicles and neglected equipment. The atmosphere should capture the aftermath of the fire and the sense of abandonment in the area.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Arson in Massachusetts caused The number of telemarketers in Massachusetts to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Fanning the Flames: A Hotline to Arson? A Correlational Study of Arson in Massachusetts and the Number of Telemarketers

The Journal of Unlikely Connections

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and The number of telemarketers in Massachusetts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9337984 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Fanning the Flames: A Hotline to Arson? A Correlational Study of Arson in Massachusetts and the Number of Telemarketers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the incidence of arson in the state of Massachusetts and the quantity of telemarketers operating within its borders. Leveraging data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research endeavors to shed light on this unexplored correlation. Our findings reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9337984, surpassing the typical threshold for statistical significance (p < 0.01) for the duration spanning 2003 to 2022. In this paper, we discuss the implications of this unexpected association, considering potential causative and confounding factors. While the link between telemarketers and arson may seem inconceivable at first blush, our results demonstrate that this peculiar relationship warrants further investigation and analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and The number of telemarketers in Massachusetts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fanning the Flames: A Hotline to Arson? A Correlational Study of Arson in Massachusetts and the Number of Telemarketers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the incidence of arson in the state of Massachusetts and the quantity of telemarketers operating within its borders. Leveraging data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research endeavors to shed light on this unexplored correlation. Our findings reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9337984, surpassing the typical threshold for statistical significance (p < 0.01) for the duration spanning 2003 to 2022. In this paper, we discuss the implications of this unexpected association, considering potential causative and confounding factors. While the link between telemarketers and arson may seem inconceivable at first blush, our results demonstrate that this peculiar relationship warrants further investigation and analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The phenomenon of arson, like a smoldering enigma, has long captivated the minds of researchers and law enforcement officials alike. To ignite our curiosity further, we now turn our attention to the perhaps less incendiary but equally elusive world of telemarketing. Indeed, the connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables may appear as illogical as using a fire extinguisher to douse a telemarketing call, yet our investigation seeks to determine whether there may just be a spark of truth in their correlation.

While the underlying motivation of arsonists may encompass a range of factors, from financial gain to psychological distress, the influence of telemarketers on the incidence of arson has hitherto been as obscure as a candle flickering in the wind. However, as we embark on this research endeavor, we approach the data with an open mind and a keen sense of curiosity, much like a scientist contemplating the mysterious properties of a new element on the periodic table.

Our curiosity is piqued by the paradoxically fiery nature of arson and the often cold-calling tactics of telemarketers. It is as if we are attempting to reconcile the heat of an inferno with the chill of an unexpected sales pitch. Yet, armed with the tools of statistical analysis, we aim to parse through the data with the precision of a meticulous detective gathering clues to solve an enigmatic case.

In this paper, we present the results of our investigation into the nexus of arson and telemarketing in the state of Massachusetts, unveiling a correlation coefficient that glows as brightly as a well-stoked hearth fire. Our analysis promises to illuminate the landscape of unexpected connections and challenges our preconceived notions, much like a sudden burst of fireworks on a tranquil evening.

As we proceed, let us stoke the flames of curiosity and foster a deeper understanding of this peculiar linkage, despite its seemingly combustible nature. Through our scientific lens, we endeavor to shed light on this sizzling, if surprising, relationship and consider the potential implications with the precision of a cautious firefighter surveying a potential blaze.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and The number of telemarketers in Massachusetts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fanning the Flames: A Hotline to Arson? A Correlational Study of Arson in Massachusetts and the Number of Telemarketers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the incidence of arson in the state of Massachusetts and the quantity of telemarketers operating within its borders. Leveraging data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research endeavors to shed light on this unexplored correlation. Our findings reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9337984, surpassing the typical threshold for statistical significance (p < 0.01) for the duration spanning 2003 to 2022. In this paper, we discuss the implications of this unexpected association, considering potential causative and confounding factors. While the link between telemarketers and arson may seem inconceivable at first blush, our results demonstrate that this peculiar relationship warrants further investigation and analysis.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The phenomenon of arson, like a smoldering enigma, has long captivated the minds of researchers and law enforcement officials alike. To ignite our curiosity further, we now turn our attention to the perhaps less incendiary but equally elusive world of telemarketing. Indeed, the connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables may appear as illogical as using a fire extinguisher to douse a telemarketing call, yet our investigation seeks to determine whether there may just be a spark of truth in their correlation.
While the underlying motivation of arsonists may encompass a range of factors, from financial gain to psychological distress, the influence of telemarketers on the incidence of arson has hitherto been as obscure as a candle flickering in the wind. However, as we embark on this research endeavor, we approach the data with an open mind and a keen sense of curiosity, much like a scientist contemplating the mysterious properties of a new element on the periodic table.
Our curiosity is piqued by the paradoxically fiery nature of arson and the often cold-calling tactics of telemarketers. It is as if we are attempting to reconcile the heat of an inferno with the chill of an unexpected sales pitch. Yet, armed with the tools of statistical analysis, we aim to parse through the data with the precision of a meticulous detective gathering clues to solve an enigmatic case.
In this paper, we present the results of our investigation into the nexus of arson and telemarketing in the state of Massachusetts, unveiling a correlation coefficient that glows as brightly as a well-stoked hearth fire. Our analysis promises to illuminate the landscape of unexpected connections and challenges our preconceived notions, much like a sudden burst of fireworks on a tranquil evening.
As we proceed, let us stoke the flames of curiosity and foster a deeper understanding of this peculiar linkage, despite its seemingly combustible nature. Through our scientific lens, we endeavor to shed light on this sizzling, if surprising, relationship and consider the potential implications with the precision of a cautious firefighter surveying a potential blaze.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The empirical investigation of the peculiar correlation between arson in the state of Massachusetts and the number of telemarketers operating within its boundaries has drawn attention from researchers with various interests. Smith et al. (2010) undertake a comprehensive examination of arson trends, emphasizing the multifaceted nature of motivations and environmental factors. Doe and Jones (2015) delve into the intricate world of telemarketing, illuminating the psychological and sociological dynamics underlying this often-maligned professional pursuit.

Turning our attention to related literature, "Arson: The Mind of a Pyromaniac" by Firestone (2018) provides a detailed exploration of the psychological elements driving individuals to commit arson, shedding light on the inner workings of the arsonist's mind. In a similar vein, "The Art of the Telemarketer: A Psychological Analysis" by Salesman (2017) offers insights into the motivations and tactics employed within the telemarketing industry, including the strategies utilized to make that crucial sale.

Expanding our purview to fiction, "The Firestarter" by King (1980) introduces us to the captivating world of a young girl wielding pyrokinetic abilities, sparking our imagination with the incendiary potential of the human mind. Likewise, "The Call of the Salesman" by Miller (1964) regales us with the tale of a charismatic salesman and the captivating allure of the telemarketing trade, albeit with an air of mystery and suspense.

In a rather nontraditional approach, the research team has taken the liberty of exploring a variety of animated and live-action children's programming under the guise of superficial entertainment, but with a subtext of scholarly curiosity. The "Smokey Bear" public service announcements and "SpongeBob SquarePants" television series both offer intriguing illustrations of the complex relationship between fire-related themes and persuasive communication, shedding unforeseen light on the ostensible connection between the world of arson and telemarketing.

These diverse works have laid the groundwork for our exploration of the inexplicable nexus between arson and telemarketing, guiding our focus towards unexpected realms and whimsical insights. As we proceed with our investigation, we aim to ignite a sense of scholarly wonderment and critical inquiry into this enigmatic relationship, akin to the flickering flames of a campfire illuminating the shadows of the forest.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and The number of telemarketers in Massachusetts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fanning the Flames: A Hotline to Arson? A Correlational Study of Arson in Massachusetts and the Number of Telemarketers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the incidence of arson in the state of Massachusetts and the quantity of telemarketers operating within its borders. Leveraging data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research endeavors to shed light on this unexplored correlation. Our findings reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9337984, surpassing the typical threshold for statistical significance (p < 0.01) for the duration spanning 2003 to 2022. In this paper, we discuss the implications of this unexpected association, considering potential causative and confounding factors. While the link between telemarketers and arson may seem inconceivable at first blush, our results demonstrate that this peculiar relationship warrants further investigation and analysis.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The phenomenon of arson, like a smoldering enigma, has long captivated the minds of researchers and law enforcement officials alike. To ignite our curiosity further, we now turn our attention to the perhaps less incendiary but equally elusive world of telemarketing. Indeed, the connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables may appear as illogical as using a fire extinguisher to douse a telemarketing call, yet our investigation seeks to determine whether there may just be a spark of truth in their correlation.
While the underlying motivation of arsonists may encompass a range of factors, from financial gain to psychological distress, the influence of telemarketers on the incidence of arson has hitherto been as obscure as a candle flickering in the wind. However, as we embark on this research endeavor, we approach the data with an open mind and a keen sense of curiosity, much like a scientist contemplating the mysterious properties of a new element on the periodic table.
Our curiosity is piqued by the paradoxically fiery nature of arson and the often cold-calling tactics of telemarketers. It is as if we are attempting to reconcile the heat of an inferno with the chill of an unexpected sales pitch. Yet, armed with the tools of statistical analysis, we aim to parse through the data with the precision of a meticulous detective gathering clues to solve an enigmatic case.
In this paper, we present the results of our investigation into the nexus of arson and telemarketing in the state of Massachusetts, unveiling a correlation coefficient that glows as brightly as a well-stoked hearth fire. Our analysis promises to illuminate the landscape of unexpected connections and challenges our preconceived notions, much like a sudden burst of fireworks on a tranquil evening.
As we proceed, let us stoke the flames of curiosity and foster a deeper understanding of this peculiar linkage, despite its seemingly combustible nature. Through our scientific lens, we endeavor to shed light on this sizzling, if surprising, relationship and consider the potential implications with the precision of a cautious firefighter surveying a potential blaze.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the curious connection between arson in Massachusetts and the number of telemarketers haunting the state, we employed a concoction of data collection methods and statistical analyses that would make even the most seasoned detective envious. Our research team scoured the annals of the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, surfing the web of information from 2003 to 2022 like intrepid explorers navigating uncharted territories. We gathered reports on the incidence of arson, carefully distinguishing between intentional fires and accidental conflagrations, and raked in data on the fluctuating numbers of telemarketers, distinguishing them from the more benign telecommuters that can be found lurking in the data.

The data was then subjected to a meticulous process of cleaning and preparation, akin to sifting through the ashes of a suspicious fire to uncover clues. We painstakingly ensured that all relevant variables were suitably aligned, akin to aligning matches in a matchbook, before proceeding with the inferential analyses. Our statistical toolkit was employed with the finesse of an experienced arson investigator, utilizing correlation analyses to unearth any smoldering relationships between these seemingly disparate variables.

To measure the strength and direction of the association between arson and the proliferation of telemarketers, we computed the Pearson correlation coefficient, with a few knowing winks and nudges between the data points. This classic statistic served as our trusty magnifying glass, enabling us to discern any flickers of association amidst the raw data. We considered the resulting coefficient in relation to its corresponding p-value, ensuring that our findings were more than mere statistical sparks, but rather robust bonfires of significance with an alpha level set to bring the heat at p < 0.01.

In our quest to unravel the enigma of this unlikely correlation, we took great care to consider potential confounding variables, performing additional analyses to control for factors such as population density, socioeconomic indicators, and perhaps even the temperature of the Massachusetts Mondays. Our models were calibrated to illuminate any potential lurking dangers, akin to designing a fire escape plan for a statistical inferno. Lastly, we conducted sensitivity analyses, probing the robustness of our findings to ensure they did not flame out under pressure like a poorly maintained gas stove.

Thus, armed with an arsenal of data and statistical expertise, we embarked on our investigation with the vigor of a proverbial "hotline to arson," seeking to ascertain the veracity of this unexpected alliance between arson and telemarketing in the grand Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Our methodology – while not necessarily as flashy as a fireworks display – promises to shed light on this curious correlation and stir the embers of curiosity in the scholarly community.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and The number of telemarketers in Massachusetts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9337984, r-squared of 0.8719794, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fanning the Flames: A Hotline to Arson? A Correlational Study of Arson in Massachusetts and the Number of Telemarketers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the incidence of arson in the state of Massachusetts and the quantity of telemarketers operating within its borders. Leveraging data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research endeavors to shed light on this unexplored correlation. Our findings reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9337984, surpassing the typical threshold for statistical significance (p < 0.01) for the duration spanning 2003 to 2022. In this paper, we discuss the implications of this unexpected association, considering potential causative and confounding factors. While the link between telemarketers and arson may seem inconceivable at first blush, our results demonstrate that this peculiar relationship warrants further investigation and analysis.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The phenomenon of arson, like a smoldering enigma, has long captivated the minds of researchers and law enforcement officials alike. To ignite our curiosity further, we now turn our attention to the perhaps less incendiary but equally elusive world of telemarketing. Indeed, the connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables may appear as illogical as using a fire extinguisher to douse a telemarketing call, yet our investigation seeks to determine whether there may just be a spark of truth in their correlation.
While the underlying motivation of arsonists may encompass a range of factors, from financial gain to psychological distress, the influence of telemarketers on the incidence of arson has hitherto been as obscure as a candle flickering in the wind. However, as we embark on this research endeavor, we approach the data with an open mind and a keen sense of curiosity, much like a scientist contemplating the mysterious properties of a new element on the periodic table.
Our curiosity is piqued by the paradoxically fiery nature of arson and the often cold-calling tactics of telemarketers. It is as if we are attempting to reconcile the heat of an inferno with the chill of an unexpected sales pitch. Yet, armed with the tools of statistical analysis, we aim to parse through the data with the precision of a meticulous detective gathering clues to solve an enigmatic case.
In this paper, we present the results of our investigation into the nexus of arson and telemarketing in the state of Massachusetts, unveiling a correlation coefficient that glows as brightly as a well-stoked hearth fire. Our analysis promises to illuminate the landscape of unexpected connections and challenges our preconceived notions, much like a sudden burst of fireworks on a tranquil evening.
As we proceed, let us stoke the flames of curiosity and foster a deeper understanding of this peculiar linkage, despite its seemingly combustible nature. Through our scientific lens, we endeavor to shed light on this sizzling, if surprising, relationship and consider the potential implications with the precision of a cautious firefighter surveying a potential blaze.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

A scorching correlation was discovered between the incidence of arson in Massachusetts and the number of telemarketers operating within the state. Our analysis revealed an impressive correlation coefficient of 0.9337984, with an r-squared value of 0.8719794, surpassing the conventional threshold for statistical significance (p < 0.01). This robust correlation suggests a strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, as if the flames of arson were being stoked by the persistent calls of telemarketers.

Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot displaying this notable correlation. The association between the two variables blazes brightly on the plot, much like a bonfire on a chilly evening, leaving little doubt about the strength of this unexpected relationship.

The findings of our study challenge conventional wisdom, igniting a spark of curiosity regarding the unexpected association between arson and telemarketing. This correlation prompts us to consider potential causal mechanisms and confounding factors, as we seek to untangle this enigmatic linkage.

The unexpected alignment of arson and telemarketing in our analysis rekindles our appreciation for the serendipitous connections that scientific inquiry can uncover. The strong correlation between these variables invites further investigation and analysis, as we strive to fan the flames of curiosity and understanding regarding this peculiar relationship.

The results of our study illuminate a surprising correlation, leading us to ponder the unexpected ways in which seemingly unrelated phenomena can become entangled. We trust that this unexpected linkage will ignite further inquiry and discourse within the research community, continuing to fuel the fire of scientific exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and The number of telemarketers in Massachusetts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Fanning the Flames: A Hotline to Arson? A Correlational Study of Arson in Massachusetts and the Number of Telemarketers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the incidence of arson in the state of Massachusetts and the quantity of telemarketers operating within its borders. Leveraging data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research endeavors to shed light on this unexplored correlation. Our findings reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9337984, surpassing the typical threshold for statistical significance (p < 0.01) for the duration spanning 2003 to 2022. In this paper, we discuss the implications of this unexpected association, considering potential causative and confounding factors. While the link between telemarketers and arson may seem inconceivable at first blush, our results demonstrate that this peculiar relationship warrants further investigation and analysis.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The empirical investigation of the peculiar correlation between arson in the state of Massachusetts and the number of telemarketers operating within its boundaries has drawn attention from researchers with various interests. Smith et al. (2010) undertake a comprehensive examination of arson trends, emphasizing the multifaceted nature of motivations and environmental factors. Doe and Jones (2015) delve into the intricate world of telemarketing, illuminating the psychological and sociological dynamics underlying this often-maligned professional pursuit.
Turning our attention to related literature, "Arson: The Mind of a Pyromaniac" by Firestone (2018) provides a detailed exploration of the psychological elements driving individuals to commit arson, shedding light on the inner workings of the arsonist's mind. In a similar vein, "The Art of the Telemarketer: A Psychological Analysis" by Salesman (2017) offers insights into the motivations and tactics employed within the telemarketing industry, including the strategies utilized to make that crucial sale.
Expanding our purview to fiction, "The Firestarter" by King (1980) introduces us to the captivating world of a young girl wielding pyrokinetic abilities, sparking our imagination with the incendiary potential of the human mind. Likewise, "The Call of the Salesman" by Miller (1964) regales us with the tale of a charismatic salesman and the captivating allure of the telemarketing trade, albeit with an air of mystery and suspense.
In a rather nontraditional approach, the research team has taken the liberty of exploring a variety of animated and live-action children's programming under the guise of superficial entertainment, but with a subtext of scholarly curiosity. The "Smokey Bear" public service announcements and "SpongeBob SquarePants" television series both offer intriguing illustrations of the complex relationship between fire-related themes and persuasive communication, shedding unforeseen light on the ostensible connection between the world of arson and telemarketing.
These diverse works have laid the groundwork for our exploration of the inexplicable nexus between arson and telemarketing, guiding our focus towards unexpected realms and whimsical insights. As we proceed with our investigation, we aim to ignite a sense of scholarly wonderment and critical inquiry into this enigmatic relationship, akin to the flickering flames of a campfire illuminating the shadows of the forest.

[[RESULTS]]
A scorching correlation was discovered between the incidence of arson in Massachusetts and the number of telemarketers operating within the state. Our analysis revealed an impressive correlation coefficient of 0.9337984, with an r-squared value of 0.8719794, surpassing the conventional threshold for statistical significance (p < 0.01). This robust correlation suggests a strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, as if the flames of arson were being stoked by the persistent calls of telemarketers.
Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot displaying this notable correlation. The association between the two variables blazes brightly on the plot, much like a bonfire on a chilly evening, leaving little doubt about the strength of this unexpected relationship.
The findings of our study challenge conventional wisdom, igniting a spark of curiosity regarding the unexpected association between arson and telemarketing. This correlation prompts us to consider potential causal mechanisms and confounding factors, as we seek to untangle this enigmatic linkage.
The unexpected alignment of arson and telemarketing in our analysis rekindles our appreciation for the serendipitous connections that scientific inquiry can uncover. The strong correlation between these variables invites further investigation and analysis, as we strive to fan the flames of curiosity and understanding regarding this peculiar relationship.
The results of our study illuminate a surprising correlation, leading us to ponder the unexpected ways in which seemingly unrelated phenomena can become entangled. We trust that this unexpected linkage will ignite further inquiry and discourse within the research community, continuing to fuel the fire of scientific exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The scorching correlation uncovered between the incidence of arson in Massachusetts and the number of telemarketers operating within the state is nothing short of intriguing. Our findings not only confirm the unexpected alliance between these seemingly disparate variables but also provide empirical evidence that fortifies the whimsical and sometimes absurd connections unearthed in our literature review.

In tandem with Firestone's (2018) exploration of the psychological elements triggering arson, our results kindle the idea that the incessant presence of telemarketers may inadvertently fan the flames of arson, be it through the exasperation caused by persistent phone calls or the intriguing potential for a telemarketer to inadvertently set fire to the temper of a prospective customer. The implications are undeniably combustible, as our study unveils a statistically significant correlation that cannot be dismissed as mere statistical noise.

Our findings dance in harmony with "The Call of the Salesman" by Miller (1964), as we witness the captivating allure of the telemarketing trade and its potential to spark fiery emotions within individuals. Therefore, one could whimsically assert that the telemarketers, much like the human torch in King's "The Firestarter" (1980), inadvertently ignite the flames of arson in Massachusetts. While such whimsical connections may generate a chuckle, our robust statistical analysis affirms that this correlation is no laughing matter.

The significant correlation coefficient and r-squared value unearthed in our study tantalizingly lend credence to the idea that the fiery passion of telemarketers may indeed contribute to the escalating incidents of arson, akin to the phenomenon of a controlled burn getting out of hand. It is a testament to the unforeseen ways in which scientific inquiry can shed light on the curious relationships that permeate our world.

In sum, our study not only upholds the unexpected connection between arson and telemarketing but also fans the flames of interest and inquiry into the unpredictably whimsical nature of statistical relationships. This unexpected linkage serves as a cogent reminder of the unforeseen connections that animate the fabric of our statistical universe, and it is bound to spark further discourse and curiosity within the research community.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and The number of telemarketers in Massachusetts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Fanning the Flames: A Hotline to Arson? A Correlational Study of Arson in Massachusetts and the Number of Telemarketers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the incidence of arson in the state of Massachusetts and the quantity of telemarketers operating within its borders. Leveraging data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research endeavors to shed light on this unexplored correlation. Our findings reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9337984, surpassing the typical threshold for statistical significance (p < 0.01) for the duration spanning 2003 to 2022. In this paper, we discuss the implications of this unexpected association, considering potential causative and confounding factors. While the link between telemarketers and arson may seem inconceivable at first blush, our results demonstrate that this peculiar relationship warrants further investigation and analysis.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The phenomenon of arson, like a smoldering enigma, has long captivated the minds of researchers and law enforcement officials alike. To ignite our curiosity further, we now turn our attention to the perhaps less incendiary but equally elusive world of telemarketing. Indeed, the connection between these two seemingly unrelated variables may appear as illogical as using a fire extinguisher to douse a telemarketing call, yet our investigation seeks to determine whether there may just be a spark of truth in their correlation.
While the underlying motivation of arsonists may encompass a range of factors, from financial gain to psychological distress, the influence of telemarketers on the incidence of arson has hitherto been as obscure as a candle flickering in the wind. However, as we embark on this research endeavor, we approach the data with an open mind and a keen sense of curiosity, much like a scientist contemplating the mysterious properties of a new element on the periodic table.
Our curiosity is piqued by the paradoxically fiery nature of arson and the often cold-calling tactics of telemarketers. It is as if we are attempting to reconcile the heat of an inferno with the chill of an unexpected sales pitch. Yet, armed with the tools of statistical analysis, we aim to parse through the data with the precision of a meticulous detective gathering clues to solve an enigmatic case.
In this paper, we present the results of our investigation into the nexus of arson and telemarketing in the state of Massachusetts, unveiling a correlation coefficient that glows as brightly as a well-stoked hearth fire. Our analysis promises to illuminate the landscape of unexpected connections and challenges our preconceived notions, much like a sudden burst of fireworks on a tranquil evening.
As we proceed, let us stoke the flames of curiosity and foster a deeper understanding of this peculiar linkage, despite its seemingly combustible nature. Through our scientific lens, we endeavor to shed light on this sizzling, if surprising, relationship and consider the potential implications with the precision of a cautious firefighter surveying a potential blaze.

[[RESULTS]]
A scorching correlation was discovered between the incidence of arson in Massachusetts and the number of telemarketers operating within the state. Our analysis revealed an impressive correlation coefficient of 0.9337984, with an r-squared value of 0.8719794, surpassing the conventional threshold for statistical significance (p < 0.01). This robust correlation suggests a strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, as if the flames of arson were being stoked by the persistent calls of telemarketers.
Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot displaying this notable correlation. The association between the two variables blazes brightly on the plot, much like a bonfire on a chilly evening, leaving little doubt about the strength of this unexpected relationship.
The findings of our study challenge conventional wisdom, igniting a spark of curiosity regarding the unexpected association between arson and telemarketing. This correlation prompts us to consider potential causal mechanisms and confounding factors, as we seek to untangle this enigmatic linkage.
The unexpected alignment of arson and telemarketing in our analysis rekindles our appreciation for the serendipitous connections that scientific inquiry can uncover. The strong correlation between these variables invites further investigation and analysis, as we strive to fan the flames of curiosity and understanding regarding this peculiar relationship.
The results of our study illuminate a surprising correlation, leading us to ponder the unexpected ways in which seemingly unrelated phenomena can become entangled. We trust that this unexpected linkage will ignite further inquiry and discourse within the research community, continuing to fuel the fire of scientific exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has illuminated a scorching correlation between the incidence of arson in the state of Massachusetts and the number of telemarketers operating within its borders. The exceptionally robust correlation coefficient of 0.9337984, coupled with the r-squared value of 0.8719794, underscores a striking relationship that is as unexpected as finding a smoke detector at a bonfire convention. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom, sparking a hot debate in the research community and prompting further inquiries, much like a sparkler on a Fourth of July night.

While our study sheds light on this peculiar linkage, further research may not be needed in this area. As they say, "Where there's smoke, there's fire," but in this case, the smoke signals have spoken, and it seems that there's no need to throw more fuel on the fire. With that in mind, we extinguish the flames of curiosity surrounding this unexpected correlation and recommend redirecting research efforts toward less fiery but equally incandescent subjects. After all, there's no need to keep poking a smoldering campfire when there are plenty of other scientific tinderboxes waiting to be explored.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fanning the Flames: A Hotline to Arson? A Correlational Study of Arson in Massachusetts and the Number of Telemarketers. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Unlikely Connections


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fanning the Flames: A Hotline to Arson? A Correlational Study of Arson in Massachusetts and the Number of Telemarketers. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Social Science Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fanning the Flames: A Hotline to Arson? A Correlational Study of Arson in Massachusetts and the Number of Telemarketers with an abstract of This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the incidence of arson in the state of Massachusetts and the quantity of telemarketers operating within its borders. Leveraging data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research endeavors to shed light on this unexplored correlation. Our findings reveal a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9337984, surpassing the typical threshold for statistical significance (p < 0.01) for the duration spanning 2003 to 2022. In this paper, we discuss the implications of this unexpected association, considering potential causative and confounding factors. While the link between telemarketers and arson may seem inconceivable at first blush, our results demonstrate that this peculiar relationship warrants further investigation and analysis.

ChatGPT:

Arson in Massachusetts, telemarketers correlation, crime statistics Massachusetts, correlation between telemarketing and crime, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services data, Bureau of Labor Statistics data, telemarketers and arson causative factors, telemarketing industry impact on crime, Massachusetts arson trends, telemarketing density and crime correlation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Arson in Massachusetts
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in Massachusetts
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in Massachusetts

The number of telemarketers in Massachusetts
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of telemarketers in Massachusetts
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of telemarketers in Massachusetts

Correlation r = 0.9337984 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8719794 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 87.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of telemarketers in Massachusetts) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Arson in Massachusetts) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.8E-9. 0.0000000018213877152916872000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 1.8E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 549,031,923 random variables You don't actually need 549 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.84, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Arson in Massachusetts (Arson rate)10.59.39.710.310.610.610.7108.59.37.67.15.76.55.64.34.56.34.55.3
The number of telemarketers in Massachusetts (Telemarketers)6160576059905510604060206310488044503830364036903140283024502230176012901290870




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([10.5,9.3,9.7,10.3,10.6,10.6,10.7,10,8.5,9.3,7.6,7.1,5.7,6.5,5.6,4.3,4.5,6.3,4.5,5.3,])
array_2 = np.array([6160,5760,5990,5510,6040,6020,6310,4880,4450,3830,3640,3690,3140,2830,2450,2230,1760,1290,1290,870,])
array_1_name = "Arson in Massachusetts"
array_2_name = "The number of telemarketers in Massachusetts"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 4217 · Black Variable ID: 20048 · Red Variable ID: 9484
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0