about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,193 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air quality in Wichita and the second variable is Golden State Warriors' Seasonal Total Wins.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

There were fewer distractions from smog-blocking jump shots. Clean air meant better atmosphere for 3-pointers. It's as if the team was breathing in success with each fresh, pristine gulp of air. It was like their opponents were gasping for victory while the Warriors were just breezing through the season.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a lively 2D animation of the Golden State Warriors basketball team, each player exuding skill and determination, shooting three-pointers with flawless precision. As they score, the backdrop illuminates with the city of Wichita beneath a clear, smog-free sky. The players move with grace and agility, and the vibrant animation conveys the excitement and energy of their victorious season. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air quality in Wichita and Golden State Warriors' Seasonal Total Wins. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Whimsical illustration Surrealism Cybernetic art Cute 2D animation Cutsy art illustration
ChatGPT: Cute 2D animation

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air quality in Wichita and Golden State Warriors' Seasonal Total Wins, in the following situation: There were fewer distractions from smog-blocking jump shots. Clean air meant better atmosphere for 3-pointers. It's as if the team was breathing in success with each fresh, pristine gulp of air. It was like their opponents were gasping for victory while the Warriors were just breezing through the season.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Wichita, the Golden State Warriors soared to victory, shooting three-pointers under a clear, smog-free sky. As they breathed in the fresh air, they breezed through the season, leaving their opponents gasping for victory.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cute 2D animation ] and depicting this scene: In Wichita, the Golden State Warriors soared to victory, shooting three-pointers under a clear, smog-free sky. As they breathed in the fresh air, they breezed through the season, leaving their opponents gasping for victory. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a lively 2D animation of the Golden State Warriors basketball team, each player exuding skill and determination, shooting three-pointers with flawless precision. As they score, the backdrop illuminates with the city of Wichita beneath a clear, smog-free sky. The players move with grace and agility, and the vibrant animation conveys the excitement and energy of their victorious season.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air quality in Wichita caused Golden State Warriors' Seasonal Total Wins to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Air Quality and Quality Wins: A Rhyme Time Analysis of Wichita's Clean Air and Golden State Warriors' Victories

The Journal of Ecological Rhythms and Sporting Success

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Wichita and Golden State Warriors' Seasonal Total Wins. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and NBA to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6945006 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Air Quality and Quality Wins: A Rhyme Time Analysis of Wichita's Clean Air and Golden State Warriors' Victories"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we conducted a whimsical investigation into the potential relationship between air quality in Wichita, Kansas, and the seasonal total wins of the Golden State Warriors. Armed with an arsenal of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the NBA, we set out on a quest to determine if there is a rhyme or reason to the fluctuations in the Warriors' performance based on the air quality in Wichita. To our surprise and delight, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6945006, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning 1980 to 2022. Who knew that Wichita's air could have such influence on the Warriors' rise?

Upon further examination of the data, we discovered a delightful dad joke-worthy observation: it seems that when the air quality in Wichita is as fresh as a basketball bouncing on a gym floor, the Golden State Warriors tend to soar to victory. Conversely, when the air quality takes a turn for the smoggier, the Warriors' wins seem to dissipate like clouds on a windy day. It's almost as if the players are breathing sighs of relief when the air is cleaner.

While the causation versus correlation discussion is ongoing, it's hard not to appreciate the amusing relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our research serves as a lighthearted reminder that sometimes the most unexpected connections can be discovered when we take a playful approach to data analysis. After all, as they say, "a little humor can be a breath of fresh air in academia."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Wichita and Golden State Warriors' Seasonal Total Wins. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Air Quality and Quality Wins: A Rhyme Time Analysis of Wichita's Clean Air and Golden State Warriors' Victories"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we conducted a whimsical investigation into the potential relationship between air quality in Wichita, Kansas, and the seasonal total wins of the Golden State Warriors. Armed with an arsenal of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the NBA, we set out on a quest to determine if there is a rhyme or reason to the fluctuations in the Warriors' performance based on the air quality in Wichita. To our surprise and delight, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6945006, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning 1980 to 2022. Who knew that Wichita's air could have such influence on the Warriors' rise?

Upon further examination of the data, we discovered a delightful dad joke-worthy observation: it seems that when the air quality in Wichita is as fresh as a basketball bouncing on a gym floor, the Golden State Warriors tend to soar to victory. Conversely, when the air quality takes a turn for the smoggier, the Warriors' wins seem to dissipate like clouds on a windy day. It's almost as if the players are breathing sighs of relief when the air is cleaner.

While the causation versus correlation discussion is ongoing, it's hard not to appreciate the amusing relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our research serves as a lighthearted reminder that sometimes the most unexpected connections can be discovered when we take a playful approach to data analysis. After all, as they say, "a little humor can be a breath of fresh air in academia."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The quest to uncover hidden and unexpected connections in the world of data analysis has brought forth a multitude of enlightening revelations, some more whimsical than others. In the spirit of this whimsy, we set out to explore the peculiar relationship between the air quality in Wichita, Kansas, and the seasonal total wins of the Golden State Warriors, utilizing a blend of statistical analysis and good old-fashioned humor.

It's often said that laughter is the best medicine, and in the case of our research, we couldn't agree more – especially when the data points to a correlation that is as crystal clear as the Kansas skies on a blissful spring day.

As we dived into the depths of environmental quality reports and NBA statistics, we found ourselves coughing up unexpected results. It turns out that there exists a robust statistical connection between the air quality in Wichita and the success of the Golden State Warriors - as bizarre as it may sound! It seems that the cleaner the air in Wichita, the more wins for the Warriors. It's as if the teams' success is not just a matter of skill, strategy, and training, but also of the air particles behaving in just the right way.

But fear not, dear reader, our study is not all bluster and jest. The statistics speak for themselves, and the correlation coefficient of 0.6945006 is nothing to sneeze at. In fact, it's enough to make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow – or at the very least, give a hearty chuckle.

This unexpected correlation seems to point to a kind of "air-ythmetic" that goes beyond the realm of typical sports analysis, much like a playful puzzle waiting to be solved. It's almost as if the basketball court becomes a stage for a cosmic dance between the atmosphere of Wichita and the Warriors on the court, with each breath and bounce intertwining in a symphony of statistical synchrony.

As we press on with our whimsical investigation, it's worth noting the delightful dad-worthy coincidence that emerged from our findings: it seems that when the air quality in Wichita is pristine, the Golden State Warriors manage to "air" out their opponents and secure victories. It's enough to make one appreciate the playful twists and turns that data analysis can take, especially when it offers unexpected parallels to the humor found in everyday life.

With this light-hearted yet substantial correlation at the center of our study, we embark on a journey into the wondrous world of data-driven discovery, armed with basketballs, bar charts, and a healthy dose of wit. In the words of the wise and pun-loving scholars, "when the air's clean, the wins are keen!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Wichita and Golden State Warriors' Seasonal Total Wins. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Air Quality and Quality Wins: A Rhyme Time Analysis of Wichita's Clean Air and Golden State Warriors' Victories"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we conducted a whimsical investigation into the potential relationship between air quality in Wichita, Kansas, and the seasonal total wins of the Golden State Warriors. Armed with an arsenal of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the NBA, we set out on a quest to determine if there is a rhyme or reason to the fluctuations in the Warriors' performance based on the air quality in Wichita. To our surprise and delight, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6945006, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning 1980 to 2022. Who knew that Wichita's air could have such influence on the Warriors' rise?

Upon further examination of the data, we discovered a delightful dad joke-worthy observation: it seems that when the air quality in Wichita is as fresh as a basketball bouncing on a gym floor, the Golden State Warriors tend to soar to victory. Conversely, when the air quality takes a turn for the smoggier, the Warriors' wins seem to dissipate like clouds on a windy day. It's almost as if the players are breathing sighs of relief when the air is cleaner.

While the causation versus correlation discussion is ongoing, it's hard not to appreciate the amusing relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our research serves as a lighthearted reminder that sometimes the most unexpected connections can be discovered when we take a playful approach to data analysis. After all, as they say, "a little humor can be a breath of fresh air in academia."

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The quest to uncover hidden and unexpected connections in the world of data analysis has brought forth a multitude of enlightening revelations, some more whimsical than others. In the spirit of this whimsy, we set out to explore the peculiar relationship between the air quality in Wichita, Kansas, and the seasonal total wins of the Golden State Warriors, utilizing a blend of statistical analysis and good old-fashioned humor.
It's often said that laughter is the best medicine, and in the case of our research, we couldn't agree more – especially when the data points to a correlation that is as crystal clear as the Kansas skies on a blissful spring day.
As we dived into the depths of environmental quality reports and NBA statistics, we found ourselves coughing up unexpected results. It turns out that there exists a robust statistical connection between the air quality in Wichita and the success of the Golden State Warriors - as bizarre as it may sound! It seems that the cleaner the air in Wichita, the more wins for the Warriors. It's as if the teams' success is not just a matter of skill, strategy, and training, but also of the air particles behaving in just the right way.
But fear not, dear reader, our study is not all bluster and jest. The statistics speak for themselves, and the correlation coefficient of 0.6945006 is nothing to sneeze at. In fact, it's enough to make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow – or at the very least, give a hearty chuckle.
This unexpected correlation seems to point to a kind of "air-ythmetic" that goes beyond the realm of typical sports analysis, much like a playful puzzle waiting to be solved. It's almost as if the basketball court becomes a stage for a cosmic dance between the atmosphere of Wichita and the Warriors on the court, with each breath and bounce intertwining in a symphony of statistical synchrony.
As we press on with our whimsical investigation, it's worth noting the delightful dad-worthy coincidence that emerged from our findings: it seems that when the air quality in Wichita is pristine, the Golden State Warriors manage to "air" out their opponents and secure victories. It's enough to make one appreciate the playful twists and turns that data analysis can take, especially when it offers unexpected parallels to the humor found in everyday life.
With this light-hearted yet substantial correlation at the center of our study, we embark on a journey into the wondrous world of data-driven discovery, armed with basketballs, bar charts, and a healthy dose of wit. In the words of the wise and pun-loving scholars, "when the air's clean, the wins are keen!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

A number of scholarly studies have explored the impact of environmental factors on athletic performance, illuminating the often overlooked interplay between nature's elements and human achievement. Smith and Doe (2015) examined the influence of air quality on the cardiovascular endurance of athletes, shedding light on the potential effects of pollution on physical performance. Jones et al. (2018) delved into the relationship between air pollution and respiratory health in athletes, emphasizing the critical role of clean air in maintaining peak athletic condition.

In a whimsical twist of fate, it seems that the air quality in Wichita has emerged as a surprising player in the successes and defeats of the Golden State Warriors. The correlation between the seasonal total wins of the Warriors and the air quality index of Wichita has not escaped the notice of enthusiasts, prompting a lighthearted exploration of this unexpected connection.

Turning to non-fiction sources, "Clean Air and Clear Victories: The Untold Story of Wichita's Influence on NBA Wins" by Airborne Smith provides a rigorous analysis of the statistical relationship between Wichita's air quality and the Golden State Warriors' triumphs. The book presents a compelling argument for the atmospheric influence on the Warriors' performance, backed by meticulously gathered data and a dash of playfulness.

Moving on to fictional works that appear to be related to this whimsical correlation, "Basketball Breezes: The Windy Ways of Victory" by Slam Dunk Doe offers a fanciful narrative of how the gentle zephyrs of Wichita's air weave their way into the game, propelling the Warriors to delightful wins that seem almost magical.

As the literature review takes a turn for the unexpected, we turn to less conventional sources of insight, drawing wisdom from surprising quarters. In a nod to the curious and the comically inclined, this study finds inspiration in the unlikeliest of places – including, but not limited to, the cryptic messages hidden within CVS receipts, the enigmatic whispers of fortune cookies, and the bewildering prognostications of magic eight balls. After all, when seeking to unravel the mysterious dance between Wichita's air and the Warriors' victories, one must be open to unconventional sources of wisdom and whimsy.

In the end, as we embark on this delightfully unconventional exploration, it becomes evident that amidst the statistical rigor and scholarly musings, there exists a delightful playground of tongue-in-cheek connections waiting to be discovered. As the old adage goes, "when the air's pure, the wins endure" – a whimsical reminder of the unexpected joys and merriment that can arise from playful pursuits of knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Wichita and Golden State Warriors' Seasonal Total Wins. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and NBA . You used data from 1980 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Air Quality and Quality Wins: A Rhyme Time Analysis of Wichita's Clean Air and Golden State Warriors' Victories"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we conducted a whimsical investigation into the potential relationship between air quality in Wichita, Kansas, and the seasonal total wins of the Golden State Warriors. Armed with an arsenal of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the NBA, we set out on a quest to determine if there is a rhyme or reason to the fluctuations in the Warriors' performance based on the air quality in Wichita. To our surprise and delight, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6945006, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning 1980 to 2022. Who knew that Wichita's air could have such influence on the Warriors' rise?

Upon further examination of the data, we discovered a delightful dad joke-worthy observation: it seems that when the air quality in Wichita is as fresh as a basketball bouncing on a gym floor, the Golden State Warriors tend to soar to victory. Conversely, when the air quality takes a turn for the smoggier, the Warriors' wins seem to dissipate like clouds on a windy day. It's almost as if the players are breathing sighs of relief when the air is cleaner.

While the causation versus correlation discussion is ongoing, it's hard not to appreciate the amusing relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our research serves as a lighthearted reminder that sometimes the most unexpected connections can be discovered when we take a playful approach to data analysis. After all, as they say, "a little humor can be a breath of fresh air in academia."

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The quest to uncover hidden and unexpected connections in the world of data analysis has brought forth a multitude of enlightening revelations, some more whimsical than others. In the spirit of this whimsy, we set out to explore the peculiar relationship between the air quality in Wichita, Kansas, and the seasonal total wins of the Golden State Warriors, utilizing a blend of statistical analysis and good old-fashioned humor.
It's often said that laughter is the best medicine, and in the case of our research, we couldn't agree more – especially when the data points to a correlation that is as crystal clear as the Kansas skies on a blissful spring day.
As we dived into the depths of environmental quality reports and NBA statistics, we found ourselves coughing up unexpected results. It turns out that there exists a robust statistical connection between the air quality in Wichita and the success of the Golden State Warriors - as bizarre as it may sound! It seems that the cleaner the air in Wichita, the more wins for the Warriors. It's as if the teams' success is not just a matter of skill, strategy, and training, but also of the air particles behaving in just the right way.
But fear not, dear reader, our study is not all bluster and jest. The statistics speak for themselves, and the correlation coefficient of 0.6945006 is nothing to sneeze at. In fact, it's enough to make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow – or at the very least, give a hearty chuckle.
This unexpected correlation seems to point to a kind of "air-ythmetic" that goes beyond the realm of typical sports analysis, much like a playful puzzle waiting to be solved. It's almost as if the basketball court becomes a stage for a cosmic dance between the atmosphere of Wichita and the Warriors on the court, with each breath and bounce intertwining in a symphony of statistical synchrony.
As we press on with our whimsical investigation, it's worth noting the delightful dad-worthy coincidence that emerged from our findings: it seems that when the air quality in Wichita is pristine, the Golden State Warriors manage to "air" out their opponents and secure victories. It's enough to make one appreciate the playful twists and turns that data analysis can take, especially when it offers unexpected parallels to the humor found in everyday life.
With this light-hearted yet substantial correlation at the center of our study, we embark on a journey into the wondrous world of data-driven discovery, armed with basketballs, bar charts, and a healthy dose of wit. In the words of the wise and pun-loving scholars, "when the air's clean, the wins are keen!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To effectively unravel the mysterious connection between the air quality in Wichita and the Golden State Warriors' seasonal total wins, our research team embarked on an elaborate, yet delightfully quirky, methodological adventure. Picture a mix of statistical analysis, basketball acumen, and a pinch of good-natured humor – a concoction worthy of a scholarly sitcom.

Firstly, we gathered air quality data from Wichita, Kansas, with the precision of a sharpshooting basketball player aiming for the hoop. Our trusted sources included the Environmental Protection Agency, which provided us with a treasure trove of air quality indices, pollutant concentrations, and ozone levels. For NBA statistics, we relied on the NBA itself for comprehensive data on the Golden State Warriors' seasonal performance, capturing every game, win, and championship with the kind of precision that only a dedicated fan could match.

Once armed with these datasets, we put our thinking caps on, or should I say, our "thinking basketball jerseys," and dove into the world of statistical analysis. We subjected the air quality data to rigorous scrutiny, employing a complex series of statistical models to identify patterns, trends, and correlations. We also utilized time series analysis to track the ebb and flow of air quality over the years, much like tracking the rhythmic tempo of a basketball game.

As for the Golden State Warriors' performance, we meticulously dissected the team's seasonal wins, losses, and winning streaks, applying various statistical techniques to unveil the potential influence of Wichita's air quality on the team's success. We ensured that our analysis was as thorough as a pre-game warm-up, leaving no stone or basketball unturned in our quest for statistical enlightenment.

In a rather unorthodox move, we also incorporated a touch of lightheartedness into our methodology, infusing our analyses with puns, jokes, and whimsical analogies. After all, a study of this caliber deserves a dash of levity, and what better way to enliven our research than with the occasional dad joke? As they say, "all work and no play makes for a statistically significant, but dreadfully dull, paper."

In sum, our methodology danced between the realms of statistical rigor and good-natured glee, making for an unorthodox yet effective approach to unraveling the enigmatic link between Wichita's air quality and the Golden State Warriors' victories. With each statistical test and tongue-in-cheek remark, we nudged closer to untangling this captivating correlation, all while keeping the spirits high and the research grounded. After all, a little bit of statistical whimsy never hurt anyone, and in our case, it may have just propelled us to slam-dunk territory in data analysis.

Just like in a basketball game, it's all about finding the right balance between strategy and style – and in our case, statistics and dad jokes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Wichita and Golden State Warriors' Seasonal Total Wins. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and NBA .

For the time period 1980 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6945006, r-squared of 0.4823311, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Air Quality and Quality Wins: A Rhyme Time Analysis of Wichita's Clean Air and Golden State Warriors' Victories"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we conducted a whimsical investigation into the potential relationship between air quality in Wichita, Kansas, and the seasonal total wins of the Golden State Warriors. Armed with an arsenal of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the NBA, we set out on a quest to determine if there is a rhyme or reason to the fluctuations in the Warriors' performance based on the air quality in Wichita. To our surprise and delight, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6945006, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning 1980 to 2022. Who knew that Wichita's air could have such influence on the Warriors' rise?

Upon further examination of the data, we discovered a delightful dad joke-worthy observation: it seems that when the air quality in Wichita is as fresh as a basketball bouncing on a gym floor, the Golden State Warriors tend to soar to victory. Conversely, when the air quality takes a turn for the smoggier, the Warriors' wins seem to dissipate like clouds on a windy day. It's almost as if the players are breathing sighs of relief when the air is cleaner.

While the causation versus correlation discussion is ongoing, it's hard not to appreciate the amusing relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our research serves as a lighthearted reminder that sometimes the most unexpected connections can be discovered when we take a playful approach to data analysis. After all, as they say, "a little humor can be a breath of fresh air in academia."

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The quest to uncover hidden and unexpected connections in the world of data analysis has brought forth a multitude of enlightening revelations, some more whimsical than others. In the spirit of this whimsy, we set out to explore the peculiar relationship between the air quality in Wichita, Kansas, and the seasonal total wins of the Golden State Warriors, utilizing a blend of statistical analysis and good old-fashioned humor.
It's often said that laughter is the best medicine, and in the case of our research, we couldn't agree more – especially when the data points to a correlation that is as crystal clear as the Kansas skies on a blissful spring day.
As we dived into the depths of environmental quality reports and NBA statistics, we found ourselves coughing up unexpected results. It turns out that there exists a robust statistical connection between the air quality in Wichita and the success of the Golden State Warriors - as bizarre as it may sound! It seems that the cleaner the air in Wichita, the more wins for the Warriors. It's as if the teams' success is not just a matter of skill, strategy, and training, but also of the air particles behaving in just the right way.
But fear not, dear reader, our study is not all bluster and jest. The statistics speak for themselves, and the correlation coefficient of 0.6945006 is nothing to sneeze at. In fact, it's enough to make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow – or at the very least, give a hearty chuckle.
This unexpected correlation seems to point to a kind of "air-ythmetic" that goes beyond the realm of typical sports analysis, much like a playful puzzle waiting to be solved. It's almost as if the basketball court becomes a stage for a cosmic dance between the atmosphere of Wichita and the Warriors on the court, with each breath and bounce intertwining in a symphony of statistical synchrony.
As we press on with our whimsical investigation, it's worth noting the delightful dad-worthy coincidence that emerged from our findings: it seems that when the air quality in Wichita is pristine, the Golden State Warriors manage to "air" out their opponents and secure victories. It's enough to make one appreciate the playful twists and turns that data analysis can take, especially when it offers unexpected parallels to the humor found in everyday life.
With this light-hearted yet substantial correlation at the center of our study, we embark on a journey into the wondrous world of data-driven discovery, armed with basketballs, bar charts, and a healthy dose of wit. In the words of the wise and pun-loving scholars, "when the air's clean, the wins are keen!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

We were elated to uncover a robust and statistically significant correlation between the air quality in Wichita, Kansas, and the seasonal total wins of the Golden State Warriors. Our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6945006, an r-squared of 0.4823311, and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 1980 to 2022. It's fair to say that the numbers don't lie – even when they're taking part in a game of statistical charades.

Perhaps it's serendipitous that the air quality in Wichita, like a devoted fan, seems to blow the winds of victory in the direction of the Golden State Warriors. Much like a basketball team's rebound, the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated variables bounces right into our field of vision and demands a closer look. It's as if the players are not just shooting hoops, but also riding the whims of wind currents and atmospheric whimsy. Talk about a breath of fresh air in the world of sports analysis!

Our carefully crafted scatterplot (Fig. 1) visualizes this unexpected correlation in all its splendor, showcasing the clear trend that links cleaner air in Wichita to the Warriors' flourishing performance on the court. One might say that the plot itself is a slam dunk in the realm of data visualization – and we wouldn't argue with that assessment.

One can't help but wonder if this correlation is a testament to the age-old saying, "good air leads to a breath of fresh victories." Or perhaps, in the spirit of dad jokes, we should ponder if the Golden State Warriors have been secretly harnessing the power of "air-balling" their way to success. It's data analysis meets wordplay, and the results are anything but stale!

The statistical harmony we found between Wichita's air quality and the Warriors' wins serves as a reminder that even in the most unexpected places, there may lie hidden connections waiting to be revealed. It's as if the basketball court becomes a stage for the atmospheric ballet of victory and defeat, with each gust of wind and jump shot contributing to a delightful statistical symphony.

In the end, our findings suggest that there's more to sports victories than meets the eye – or should we say, the air. As we continue to unpack the mysteries of this unlikely relationship, one thing remains clear: when it comes to the connection between air quality and team wins, the data doesn't just speak for itself – it puts on a full-fledged comedy show. And in the world of academia, a little laughter is always a welcome addition. After all, as they say, "laughing is a slam-dunk for the soul!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Wichita and Golden State Warriors' Seasonal Total Wins. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Air Quality and Quality Wins: A Rhyme Time Analysis of Wichita's Clean Air and Golden State Warriors' Victories"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we conducted a whimsical investigation into the potential relationship between air quality in Wichita, Kansas, and the seasonal total wins of the Golden State Warriors. Armed with an arsenal of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the NBA, we set out on a quest to determine if there is a rhyme or reason to the fluctuations in the Warriors' performance based on the air quality in Wichita. To our surprise and delight, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6945006, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning 1980 to 2022. Who knew that Wichita's air could have such influence on the Warriors' rise?

Upon further examination of the data, we discovered a delightful dad joke-worthy observation: it seems that when the air quality in Wichita is as fresh as a basketball bouncing on a gym floor, the Golden State Warriors tend to soar to victory. Conversely, when the air quality takes a turn for the smoggier, the Warriors' wins seem to dissipate like clouds on a windy day. It's almost as if the players are breathing sighs of relief when the air is cleaner.

While the causation versus correlation discussion is ongoing, it's hard not to appreciate the amusing relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our research serves as a lighthearted reminder that sometimes the most unexpected connections can be discovered when we take a playful approach to data analysis. After all, as they say, "a little humor can be a breath of fresh air in academia."

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
A number of scholarly studies have explored the impact of environmental factors on athletic performance, illuminating the often overlooked interplay between nature's elements and human achievement. Smith and Doe (2015) examined the influence of air quality on the cardiovascular endurance of athletes, shedding light on the potential effects of pollution on physical performance. Jones et al. (2018) delved into the relationship between air pollution and respiratory health in athletes, emphasizing the critical role of clean air in maintaining peak athletic condition.
In a whimsical twist of fate, it seems that the air quality in Wichita has emerged as a surprising player in the successes and defeats of the Golden State Warriors. The correlation between the seasonal total wins of the Warriors and the air quality index of Wichita has not escaped the notice of enthusiasts, prompting a lighthearted exploration of this unexpected connection.
Turning to non-fiction sources, "Clean Air and Clear Victories: The Untold Story of Wichita's Influence on NBA Wins" by Airborne Smith provides a rigorous analysis of the statistical relationship between Wichita's air quality and the Golden State Warriors' triumphs. The book presents a compelling argument for the atmospheric influence on the Warriors' performance, backed by meticulously gathered data and a dash of playfulness.
Moving on to fictional works that appear to be related to this whimsical correlation, "Basketball Breezes: The Windy Ways of Victory" by Slam Dunk Doe offers a fanciful narrative of how the gentle zephyrs of Wichita's air weave their way into the game, propelling the Warriors to delightful wins that seem almost magical.
As the literature review takes a turn for the unexpected, we turn to less conventional sources of insight, drawing wisdom from surprising quarters. In a nod to the curious and the comically inclined, this study finds inspiration in the unlikeliest of places – including, but not limited to, the cryptic messages hidden within CVS receipts, the enigmatic whispers of fortune cookies, and the bewildering prognostications of magic eight balls. After all, when seeking to unravel the mysterious dance between Wichita's air and the Warriors' victories, one must be open to unconventional sources of wisdom and whimsy.
In the end, as we embark on this delightfully unconventional exploration, it becomes evident that amidst the statistical rigor and scholarly musings, there exists a delightful playground of tongue-in-cheek connections waiting to be discovered. As the old adage goes, "when the air's pure, the wins endure" – a whimsical reminder of the unexpected joys and merriment that can arise from playful pursuits of knowledge.

[[RESULTS]]
We were elated to uncover a robust and statistically significant correlation between the air quality in Wichita, Kansas, and the seasonal total wins of the Golden State Warriors. Our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6945006, an r-squared of 0.4823311, and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 1980 to 2022. It's fair to say that the numbers don't lie – even when they're taking part in a game of statistical charades.
Perhaps it's serendipitous that the air quality in Wichita, like a devoted fan, seems to blow the winds of victory in the direction of the Golden State Warriors. Much like a basketball team's rebound, the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated variables bounces right into our field of vision and demands a closer look. It's as if the players are not just shooting hoops, but also riding the whims of wind currents and atmospheric whimsy. Talk about a breath of fresh air in the world of sports analysis!
Our carefully crafted scatterplot (Fig. 1) visualizes this unexpected correlation in all its splendor, showcasing the clear trend that links cleaner air in Wichita to the Warriors' flourishing performance on the court. One might say that the plot itself is a slam dunk in the realm of data visualization – and we wouldn't argue with that assessment.
One can't help but wonder if this correlation is a testament to the age-old saying, "good air leads to a breath of fresh victories." Or perhaps, in the spirit of dad jokes, we should ponder if the Golden State Warriors have been secretly harnessing the power of "air-balling" their way to success. It's data analysis meets wordplay, and the results are anything but stale!
The statistical harmony we found between Wichita's air quality and the Warriors' wins serves as a reminder that even in the most unexpected places, there may lie hidden connections waiting to be revealed. It's as if the basketball court becomes a stage for the atmospheric ballet of victory and defeat, with each gust of wind and jump shot contributing to a delightful statistical symphony.
In the end, our findings suggest that there's more to sports victories than meets the eye – or should we say, the air. As we continue to unpack the mysteries of this unlikely relationship, one thing remains clear: when it comes to the connection between air quality and team wins, the data doesn't just speak for itself – it puts on a full-fledged comedy show. And in the world of academia, a little laughter is always a welcome addition. After all, as they say, "laughing is a slam-dunk for the soul!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our analysis has unveiled a captivating connection between the air quality in Wichita, Kansas, and the seasonal total wins of the Golden State Warriors. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.6945006, magnified by a p-value less than 0.01, handily supports the hypothesis that Wichita's air has been blowing the Warriors in the direction of victory. It's almost as if the players on the court are not just chasing basketballs but also chasing clean air – talk about a breath of fresh wins!

In line with prior research by Smith and Doe (2015) and Jones et al. (2018) on the impact of air quality on athletic performance, our findings echo their emphasis on the critical role of clean air in maximizing physical and, in this case, sporting prowess. It appears that the influence of air quality transcends individual athleticism and extends its invisible tendrils to shape the collective achievements of a professional basketball team. It's as if the winds of Wichita are whispering words of encouragement to the Warriors, nudging them towards victory with the gentlest of breezes. Ah, the poetic whimsy of statistical relationships!

Our results also harmonize with the enlightening work of Airborne Smith in "Clean Air and Clear Victories: The Untold Story of Wichita's Influence on NBA Wins." The statistical dance we've uncovered corroborates Smith's argument for atmospheric influence on the Warriors' performance, further validating the unexpectedly tenacious grip of Wichita's air on the fate of this NBA team. It’s almost as if every game played in the Oracle Arena carried with it the whims of Wichita's air currents, transforming the court into a stage for atmospheric ballet and statistical symphonies.

Furthermore, "Basketball Breezes: The Windy Ways of Victory" by Slam Dunk Doe finds itself endowed with a newfound sense of gravity as our analysis elevates the fanciful narrative into the realm of empirical plausibility. It's as if the playful zephyrs of Wichita's air have gone from being whimsical musings to statistical winds of change for the Golden State Warriors. Who knew that a book title could capture both poetic whimsy and statistical significance with such finesse?

Our data visualization in the form of a carefully crafted scatterplot (Fig. 1) not only serves as a striking depiction of this unexpected correlation but also demonstrates that even in the world of statistical analysis, the plot thickens – quite literally. Perhaps it's a testament to the old adage that a picture is worth a thousand words, or in this case, a thousand wins. But to keep things light, one might say that the plot itself is a slam dunk in the realm of data visualization – and we wouldn't argue with that assessment. After all, when you're presenting correlations this unexpected, a little levity could be just what the coach ordered.

In the end, our findings stress the whimsical yet undeniable interconnection between seemingly unrelated phenomena. It's a reminder that when exploring unusual relationships, one must be open to unconventional sources of wisdom and whimsy. After all, as they say, "when the air's pure, the wins endure" – a delightful lesson in the serendipitous joys that emerge from lighthearted pursuits of knowledge. And let's not forget, in academia, a little laughter can always be a slam dunk for the soul!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Wichita and Golden State Warriors' Seasonal Total Wins. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Air Quality and Quality Wins: A Rhyme Time Analysis of Wichita's Clean Air and Golden State Warriors' Victories"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we conducted a whimsical investigation into the potential relationship between air quality in Wichita, Kansas, and the seasonal total wins of the Golden State Warriors. Armed with an arsenal of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the NBA, we set out on a quest to determine if there is a rhyme or reason to the fluctuations in the Warriors' performance based on the air quality in Wichita. To our surprise and delight, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6945006, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning 1980 to 2022. Who knew that Wichita's air could have such influence on the Warriors' rise?

Upon further examination of the data, we discovered a delightful dad joke-worthy observation: it seems that when the air quality in Wichita is as fresh as a basketball bouncing on a gym floor, the Golden State Warriors tend to soar to victory. Conversely, when the air quality takes a turn for the smoggier, the Warriors' wins seem to dissipate like clouds on a windy day. It's almost as if the players are breathing sighs of relief when the air is cleaner.

While the causation versus correlation discussion is ongoing, it's hard not to appreciate the amusing relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our research serves as a lighthearted reminder that sometimes the most unexpected connections can be discovered when we take a playful approach to data analysis. After all, as they say, "a little humor can be a breath of fresh air in academia."

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The quest to uncover hidden and unexpected connections in the world of data analysis has brought forth a multitude of enlightening revelations, some more whimsical than others. In the spirit of this whimsy, we set out to explore the peculiar relationship between the air quality in Wichita, Kansas, and the seasonal total wins of the Golden State Warriors, utilizing a blend of statistical analysis and good old-fashioned humor.
It's often said that laughter is the best medicine, and in the case of our research, we couldn't agree more – especially when the data points to a correlation that is as crystal clear as the Kansas skies on a blissful spring day.
As we dived into the depths of environmental quality reports and NBA statistics, we found ourselves coughing up unexpected results. It turns out that there exists a robust statistical connection between the air quality in Wichita and the success of the Golden State Warriors - as bizarre as it may sound! It seems that the cleaner the air in Wichita, the more wins for the Warriors. It's as if the teams' success is not just a matter of skill, strategy, and training, but also of the air particles behaving in just the right way.
But fear not, dear reader, our study is not all bluster and jest. The statistics speak for themselves, and the correlation coefficient of 0.6945006 is nothing to sneeze at. In fact, it's enough to make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow – or at the very least, give a hearty chuckle.
This unexpected correlation seems to point to a kind of "air-ythmetic" that goes beyond the realm of typical sports analysis, much like a playful puzzle waiting to be solved. It's almost as if the basketball court becomes a stage for a cosmic dance between the atmosphere of Wichita and the Warriors on the court, with each breath and bounce intertwining in a symphony of statistical synchrony.
As we press on with our whimsical investigation, it's worth noting the delightful dad-worthy coincidence that emerged from our findings: it seems that when the air quality in Wichita is pristine, the Golden State Warriors manage to "air" out their opponents and secure victories. It's enough to make one appreciate the playful twists and turns that data analysis can take, especially when it offers unexpected parallels to the humor found in everyday life.
With this light-hearted yet substantial correlation at the center of our study, we embark on a journey into the wondrous world of data-driven discovery, armed with basketballs, bar charts, and a healthy dose of wit. In the words of the wise and pun-loving scholars, "when the air's clean, the wins are keen!"

[[RESULTS]]
We were elated to uncover a robust and statistically significant correlation between the air quality in Wichita, Kansas, and the seasonal total wins of the Golden State Warriors. Our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6945006, an r-squared of 0.4823311, and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 1980 to 2022. It's fair to say that the numbers don't lie – even when they're taking part in a game of statistical charades.
Perhaps it's serendipitous that the air quality in Wichita, like a devoted fan, seems to blow the winds of victory in the direction of the Golden State Warriors. Much like a basketball team's rebound, the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated variables bounces right into our field of vision and demands a closer look. It's as if the players are not just shooting hoops, but also riding the whims of wind currents and atmospheric whimsy. Talk about a breath of fresh air in the world of sports analysis!
Our carefully crafted scatterplot (Fig. 1) visualizes this unexpected correlation in all its splendor, showcasing the clear trend that links cleaner air in Wichita to the Warriors' flourishing performance on the court. One might say that the plot itself is a slam dunk in the realm of data visualization – and we wouldn't argue with that assessment.
One can't help but wonder if this correlation is a testament to the age-old saying, "good air leads to a breath of fresh victories." Or perhaps, in the spirit of dad jokes, we should ponder if the Golden State Warriors have been secretly harnessing the power of "air-balling" their way to success. It's data analysis meets wordplay, and the results are anything but stale!
The statistical harmony we found between Wichita's air quality and the Warriors' wins serves as a reminder that even in the most unexpected places, there may lie hidden connections waiting to be revealed. It's as if the basketball court becomes a stage for the atmospheric ballet of victory and defeat, with each gust of wind and jump shot contributing to a delightful statistical symphony.
In the end, our findings suggest that there's more to sports victories than meets the eye – or should we say, the air. As we continue to unpack the mysteries of this unlikely relationship, one thing remains clear: when it comes to the connection between air quality and team wins, the data doesn't just speak for itself – it puts on a full-fledged comedy show. And in the world of academia, a little laughter is always a welcome addition. After all, as they say, "laughing is a slam-dunk for the soul!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our whimsical investigation into the correlation between air quality in Wichita and the seasonal total wins of the Golden State Warriors has uncovered a surprising link that has left us in as much awe as finding a five-dollar bill in an old pair of jeans. With a correlation coefficient of 0.6945006 and a p-value less than 0.01, the statistical ties between these seemingly disparate variables are as undeniable as a bad case of "air" pollution.

It appears that when the air in Wichita is as fresh as a daisy, the Warriors tend to bring their A-game, proving that sometimes victory truly is in the air - and by "air," we mean both atmospheric conditions and good vibes! It's almost like the Warriors are riding a wave of clean oxygen straight to the basket, scoring points and winning hearts. It seems that clean air isn't just a breath of fresh air for the lungs; it's also a breath of fresh wins for the Warriors.

After all, as the saying goes, "when the air's clean, the wins are gleam" - and when it's not, well, maybe that's when their opponents take a bit of clean air for themselves. It's all a matter of cosmic balance, we suppose.

From the statistical significance to the pun-worthy parallels, it's safe to say that our findings have breathed new life into the intersection of environmental factors and sports triumphs. It's a tale of unexpected correlations and surprising synchronicities that could put even the most seasoned analysts in a jolly good mood. We won't deny it; this research has been more fun than a barrel of basketballs!

In light of these uproarious findings, we dare say that no more research is needed in this area. It seems that the air quality in Wichita and the Golden State Warriors' seasonal total wins have danced into statistical harmony, proving that even in the world of data analysis, a little humor can go a long way. It's been a pleasure to bring a touch of levity to the world of academic research - and who knew that cheering for the Warriors could also mean cheering for cleaner air in Wichita? With that, we'll take our leave, secure in the knowledge that the game of whimsical data analysis has been won - and perhaps, even perfected.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Air Quality and Quality Wins: A Rhyme Time Analysis of Wichita's Clean Air and Golden State Warriors' Victories. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Rhythms and Sporting Success


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Air Quality and Quality Wins: A Rhyme Time Analysis of Wichita's Clean Air and Golden State Warriors' Victories. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Environmental Rhymeonomics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Air Quality and Quality Wins: A Rhyme Time Analysis of Wichita's Clean Air and Golden State Warriors' Victories with an abstract of In this study, we conducted a whimsical investigation into the potential relationship between air quality in Wichita, Kansas, and the seasonal total wins of the Golden State Warriors. Armed with an arsenal of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the NBA, we set out on a quest to determine if there is a rhyme or reason to the fluctuations in the Warriors' performance based on the air quality in Wichita. To our surprise and delight, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6945006, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning 1980 to 2022. Who knew that Wichita's air could have such influence on the Warriors' rise?
Upon further examination of the data, we discovered a delightful dad joke-worthy observation: it seems that when the air quality in Wichita is as fresh as a basketball bouncing on a gym floor, the Golden State Warriors tend to soar to victory. Conversely, when the air quality takes a turn for the smoggier, the Warriors' wins seem to dissipate like clouds on a windy day. It's almost as if the players are breathing sighs of relief when the air is cleaner.
While the causation versus correlation discussion is ongoing, it's hard not to appreciate the amusing relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Our research serves as a lighthearted reminder that sometimes the most unexpected connections can be discovered when we take a playful approach to data analysis. After all, as they say, "a little humor can be a breath of fresh air in academia.

ChatGPT:

Wichita air quality, Golden State Warriors wins, correlation analysis, Environmental Protection Agency data, NBA data, Wichita air quality impact on sports performance, air quality and athletic performance, whimsical data analysis, unexpected data connections

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air quality in Wichita
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with good or moderate air quality in Wichita, KS
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in Wichita

Golden State Warriors' Seasonal Total Wins
Source: NBA
See what else correlates with Golden State Warriors' Seasonal Total Wins

Correlation r = 0.6945006 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4823311 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 48.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Golden State Warriors' Seasonal Total Wins) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air quality in Wichita) over the 43 years from 1980 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.4E-7. 0.0000002393500505361362000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.69 in 2.4E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 4,177,981 random variables You don't actually need 4 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 42 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 42 because we have two variables measured over a period of 43 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.5, 0.82 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air quality in Wichita (Good air quality)96.174995.616495.616491.506996.721396.164497.260397.260392.076597.808296.712396.712398.907110098.356296.986397.814294.520592.054894.520592.622989.86392.054893.698699.453695.342593.150798.904199.180398.356296.438493.698690.710497.808298.904110099.726810010010098.360798.630198.6301
Golden State Warriors' Seasonal Total Wins (Wins)24394530372230422043374455345026363019211917213837343442482926362347516773675857153953




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([96.1749,95.6164,95.6164,91.5069,96.7213,96.1644,97.2603,97.2603,92.0765,97.8082,96.7123,96.7123,98.9071,100,98.3562,96.9863,97.8142,94.5205,92.0548,94.5205,92.6229,89.863,92.0548,93.6986,99.4536,95.3425,93.1507,98.9041,99.1803,98.3562,96.4384,93.6986,90.7104,97.8082,98.9041,100,99.7268,100,100,100,98.3607,98.6301,98.6301,])
array_2 = np.array([24,39,45,30,37,22,30,42,20,43,37,44,55,34,50,26,36,30,19,21,19,17,21,38,37,34,34,42,48,29,26,36,23,47,51,67,73,67,58,57,15,39,53,])
array_1_name = "Air quality in Wichita"
array_2_name = "Golden State Warriors' Seasonal Total Wins"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 4193 · Black Variable ID: 21448 · Red Variable ID: 321
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0