Download png, svg
AI explanation
The fossil fuel use in Burundi has sparked a global chain reaction, leading to a surge in the production of inexpensive plastic goods. This influx of cheaply made products has fueled the expansion of dollar stores, prompting more people to search for a "burundi-ful" bargain at their nearest dollar store. It seems like the wheels on the fossil fuel bus go 'round and 'round all the way to affordable knick-knacks and doodads!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt for DALLE-3: Description: In a bustling street in Burundi, a line of cars is filling up at a busy gas station, representing heavy fossil fuel use. Nearby, a bright sign for a new Dollar Store stands out, attracting a crowd of people eager to find bargains. Some are seen searching on their smartphones for "dollar store near me" as they excitedly head towards the store. Style: Futuristic Enhancement: Render the scene with a futuristic twist, depicting the bustling street with sleek, aerodynamic cars powered by advanced energy sources. The gas station is adorned with high-tech refueling equipment, and the Dollar Store sign shines with holographic elements, emanating a futuristic glow amidst the urban landscape. The crowd is dressed in stylish, futuristic attire, and their smartphones display augmented reality overlays as they search for the dollar store. Additionally, incorporate advanced architectural elements and futuristic infrastructure to elevate the visual depiction of the interconnection between fossil fuel use and dollar stores into a futuristic context. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Fossil fuel use in Burundi and Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cybernetic art Scalar art Cute cartoon Concept art Futuristic
ChatGPT: Futuristic
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Fossil fuel use in Burundi and Google searches for 'dollar store near me', in the following situation: The fossil fuel use in Burundi has sparked a global chain reaction, leading to a surge in the production of inexpensive plastic goods. This influx of cheaply made products has fueled the expansion of dollar stores, prompting more people to search for a "burundi-ful" bargain at their nearest dollar store. It seems like the wheels on the fossil fuel bus go 'round and 'round all the way to affordable knick-knacks and doodads!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling street in Burundi, a line of cars can be seen filling up at a busy gas station, representing the heavy fossil fuel use. Nearby, a bright sign for a new Dollar Store stands out, attracting a crowd of people eager to find bargains. Some are seen searching on their smartphones for "dollar store near me" as they excitedly head towards the store. The cycle of fossil fuel use has led to the production of cheap plastic goods at the global level and the expansion of dollar stores, reflecting the interconnection between the two variables.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling street in Burundi, a line of cars can be seen filling up at a busy gas station, representing the heavy fossil fuel use. Nearby, a bright sign for a new Dollar Store stands out, attracting a crowd of people eager to find bargains. Some are seen searching on their smartphones for "dollar store near me" as they excitedly head towards the store. The cycle of fossil fuel use has led to the production of cheap plastic goods at the global level and the expansion of dollar stores, reflecting the interconnection between the two variables. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt for DALLE-3: Description: In a bustling street in Burundi, a line of cars is filling up at a busy gas station, representing heavy fossil fuel use. Nearby, a bright sign for a new Dollar Store stands out, attracting a crowd of people eager to find bargains. Some are seen searching on their smartphones for "dollar store near me" as they excitedly head towards the store. Style: Futuristic Enhancement: Render the scene with a futuristic twist, depicting the bustling street with sleek, aerodynamic cars powered by advanced energy sources. The gas station is adorned with high-tech refueling equipment, and the Dollar Store sign shines with holographic elements, emanating a futuristic glow amidst the urban landscape. The crowd is dressed in stylish, futuristic attire, and their smartphones display augmented reality overlays as they search for the dollar store. Additionally, incorporate advanced architectural elements and futuristic infrastructure to elevate the visual depiction of the interconnection between fossil fuel use and dollar stores into a futuristic context.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Fossil fuel use in Burundi caused dollar store near me (Google searches for 'dollar store near me') to increase. Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
Fueling the Search for Bargains: A Correlative Study of Fossil Fuel Use in Burundi and Google Searches for 'Dollar Store Near Me' The Journal of Economic Quirkiness Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Burundi and Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9761225 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Search for Bargains: A Correlative Study of Fossil Fuel Use in Burundi and Google Searches for 'Dollar Store Near Me'
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the hitherto unexplored, somewhat ludicrous yet surprisingly thought-provoking relationship between fossil fuel consumption patterns in Burundi and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Analyzing comprehensive data from the Energy Information Administration, coupled with Google Trends statistics, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9761225 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the tumultuous years from 2004 to 2021. We unravel the peculiar and whimsical dynamics underpinning this correlation, offering unexpected insight into consumer behavior and energy usage in the context of economic constraints. In addition to addressing this comically unconventional connection, our findings nudge researchers to ponder the whimsical interconnectedness of seemingly disparate societal metrics, and ultimately expand the horizons of interdisciplinary inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Burundi and Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Search for Bargains: A Correlative Study of Fossil Fuel Use in Burundi and Google Searches for 'Dollar Store Near Me'
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the hitherto unexplored, somewhat ludicrous yet surprisingly thought-provoking relationship between fossil fuel consumption patterns in Burundi and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Analyzing comprehensive data from the Energy Information Administration, coupled with Google Trends statistics, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9761225 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the tumultuous years from 2004 to 2021. We unravel the peculiar and whimsical dynamics underpinning this correlation, offering unexpected insight into consumer behavior and energy usage in the context of economic constraints. In addition to addressing this comically unconventional connection, our findings nudge researchers to ponder the whimsical interconnectedness of seemingly disparate societal metrics, and ultimately expand the horizons of interdisciplinary inquiry.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
When one thinks of fossil fuel use in a small, landlocked country like Burundi, the first thing that comes to mind is not typically a relentless quest for dollar store deals. However, as we delved into this bafflingly curious conundrum, we found ourselves on a journey that was equal parts eyebrow-raising and jaw-dropping.
In this paper, we embark on a joyously absurd yet intellectually stimulating exploration of the relationship between fossil fuel consumption in Burundi and the fervent pursuit of bargain prices at dollar stores. At its core, this study is a delightful departure from the solemn and predictable norms of traditional research, boldly venturing into uncharted territory where the serious meets the zany.
While some may view this inquiry with a raised eyebrow or a quizzical expression, we assure you that our foray into this wacky world is rooted in genuine scientific inquiry. As we started connecting the dots between gasoline usage and "dollar store near me" searches, we couldn't help but marvel at the comedy of errors that led us to this peculiar pairing. It's as if the statistical stars aligned to deliver an unexpected punchline in the grand cosmic joke of academic research.
Setting the stage for our investigation, we ask ourselves: What mischief lies beneath the surface of global energy consumption, and how does it manifest in the seemingly innocuous virtual quests for discounted trinkets and household necessities? Our journey takes us through the annals of data, from the gritty diagrams of energy flow to the whimsical peaks and valleys of Google search trends, where our earnest pursuit of insight encounters the delightful absurdity of modern life.
But beneath the whimsy and hilarity, there is a serious undercurrent propelling this study forward. As we uncover the surprisingly robust correlation between these seemingly incongruous variables, we are compelled to consider the broader implications for cross-disciplinary discourse. Our findings, while undeniably amusing, beckon researchers across fields to embrace the unorthodox and confront the unexpected, challenging the boundaries of what we consider to be valid avenues of scholarly investigation.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts and prepare to embark on a scholarly rollercoaster ride unlike any other. As we unpack the enigmatic correlation between fossil fuel use in Burundi and the pursuit of budget-friendly treasures, we invite you to join us in this delightfully unconventional quest for knowledge – with a generous sprinkling of humor and a dash of absurdity. Let the journey begin!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Burundi and Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Search for Bargains: A Correlative Study of Fossil Fuel Use in Burundi and Google Searches for 'Dollar Store Near Me'
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the hitherto unexplored, somewhat ludicrous yet surprisingly thought-provoking relationship between fossil fuel consumption patterns in Burundi and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Analyzing comprehensive data from the Energy Information Administration, coupled with Google Trends statistics, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9761225 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the tumultuous years from 2004 to 2021. We unravel the peculiar and whimsical dynamics underpinning this correlation, offering unexpected insight into consumer behavior and energy usage in the context of economic constraints. In addition to addressing this comically unconventional connection, our findings nudge researchers to ponder the whimsical interconnectedness of seemingly disparate societal metrics, and ultimately expand the horizons of interdisciplinary inquiry.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
When one thinks of fossil fuel use in a small, landlocked country like Burundi, the first thing that comes to mind is not typically a relentless quest for dollar store deals. However, as we delved into this bafflingly curious conundrum, we found ourselves on a journey that was equal parts eyebrow-raising and jaw-dropping.
In this paper, we embark on a joyously absurd yet intellectually stimulating exploration of the relationship between fossil fuel consumption in Burundi and the fervent pursuit of bargain prices at dollar stores. At its core, this study is a delightful departure from the solemn and predictable norms of traditional research, boldly venturing into uncharted territory where the serious meets the zany.
While some may view this inquiry with a raised eyebrow or a quizzical expression, we assure you that our foray into this wacky world is rooted in genuine scientific inquiry. As we started connecting the dots between gasoline usage and "dollar store near me" searches, we couldn't help but marvel at the comedy of errors that led us to this peculiar pairing. It's as if the statistical stars aligned to deliver an unexpected punchline in the grand cosmic joke of academic research.
Setting the stage for our investigation, we ask ourselves: What mischief lies beneath the surface of global energy consumption, and how does it manifest in the seemingly innocuous virtual quests for discounted trinkets and household necessities? Our journey takes us through the annals of data, from the gritty diagrams of energy flow to the whimsical peaks and valleys of Google search trends, where our earnest pursuit of insight encounters the delightful absurdity of modern life.
But beneath the whimsy and hilarity, there is a serious undercurrent propelling this study forward. As we uncover the surprisingly robust correlation between these seemingly incongruous variables, we are compelled to consider the broader implications for cross-disciplinary discourse. Our findings, while undeniably amusing, beckon researchers across fields to embrace the unorthodox and confront the unexpected, challenging the boundaries of what we consider to be valid avenues of scholarly investigation.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts and prepare to embark on a scholarly rollercoaster ride unlike any other. As we unpack the enigmatic correlation between fossil fuel use in Burundi and the pursuit of budget-friendly treasures, we invite you to join us in this delightfully unconventional quest for knowledge – with a generous sprinkling of humor and a dash of absurdity. Let the journey begin!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To contextualize the affably preposterous correlation between fossil fuel use in the bucolic landscapes of Burundi and the earnest Google searches for 'dollar store near me', we wade through a sea of scholarly work that forms the bedrock of our eureka moment. At the nexus of energy economics and consumer behavior lies a tapestry of research and literature, where the serious meets the ludicrous.
Smith et al. (2015) unravel the intricate web of fossil fuel consumption patterns in developing economies, laying the groundwork for our own quirky epiphany. Similarly, Doe's (2018) discerning analysis of search engine queries and their implications for consumer habits sets the stage for our whimsically quixotic exploration.
However, as we venture further down this rabbit hole, let us not forget the illuminating insights from esteemed works such as "The Economics of Fossil Fuels" by Sandra Jones and "Consumer Behavior in a Nutshell" by John Smithson. These tomes, though steeped in the gravity of academic rigor, inadvertently stoke the fires of our mirthful curiosity.
Amidst this scholarly pursuit, we stumble upon fiction works that seem eerily relevant, from "Fuel Frenzy: The Diesel Dilemma" by K. J. Rowling to "Searches and Sensibility" by Jane Austen-Smith. While not grounded in empirical reality, these literary creations tickle our fancy and serve as a jovial backdrop to our earnest investigation.
With equal parts academic rigor and whimsical indulgence, our research team took an unconventional path, drawing inspiration from the captivating absurdity of "Parks and Rec" and "The Office" – for what better way to approach a comically quirky correlation than through the lens of delightful sitcoms?
Armed with this motley crew of knowledge sources, we embark on a scholarly escapade that lends levity to the staid world of research, all the while uncovering the unexpected relationship between petrol-powered pursuits and the quest for wallet-friendly wonders.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Burundi and Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Search for Bargains: A Correlative Study of Fossil Fuel Use in Burundi and Google Searches for 'Dollar Store Near Me'
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the hitherto unexplored, somewhat ludicrous yet surprisingly thought-provoking relationship between fossil fuel consumption patterns in Burundi and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Analyzing comprehensive data from the Energy Information Administration, coupled with Google Trends statistics, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9761225 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the tumultuous years from 2004 to 2021. We unravel the peculiar and whimsical dynamics underpinning this correlation, offering unexpected insight into consumer behavior and energy usage in the context of economic constraints. In addition to addressing this comically unconventional connection, our findings nudge researchers to ponder the whimsical interconnectedness of seemingly disparate societal metrics, and ultimately expand the horizons of interdisciplinary inquiry.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
When one thinks of fossil fuel use in a small, landlocked country like Burundi, the first thing that comes to mind is not typically a relentless quest for dollar store deals. However, as we delved into this bafflingly curious conundrum, we found ourselves on a journey that was equal parts eyebrow-raising and jaw-dropping.
In this paper, we embark on a joyously absurd yet intellectually stimulating exploration of the relationship between fossil fuel consumption in Burundi and the fervent pursuit of bargain prices at dollar stores. At its core, this study is a delightful departure from the solemn and predictable norms of traditional research, boldly venturing into uncharted territory where the serious meets the zany.
While some may view this inquiry with a raised eyebrow or a quizzical expression, we assure you that our foray into this wacky world is rooted in genuine scientific inquiry. As we started connecting the dots between gasoline usage and "dollar store near me" searches, we couldn't help but marvel at the comedy of errors that led us to this peculiar pairing. It's as if the statistical stars aligned to deliver an unexpected punchline in the grand cosmic joke of academic research.
Setting the stage for our investigation, we ask ourselves: What mischief lies beneath the surface of global energy consumption, and how does it manifest in the seemingly innocuous virtual quests for discounted trinkets and household necessities? Our journey takes us through the annals of data, from the gritty diagrams of energy flow to the whimsical peaks and valleys of Google search trends, where our earnest pursuit of insight encounters the delightful absurdity of modern life.
But beneath the whimsy and hilarity, there is a serious undercurrent propelling this study forward. As we uncover the surprisingly robust correlation between these seemingly incongruous variables, we are compelled to consider the broader implications for cross-disciplinary discourse. Our findings, while undeniably amusing, beckon researchers across fields to embrace the unorthodox and confront the unexpected, challenging the boundaries of what we consider to be valid avenues of scholarly investigation.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts and prepare to embark on a scholarly rollercoaster ride unlike any other. As we unpack the enigmatic correlation between fossil fuel use in Burundi and the pursuit of budget-friendly treasures, we invite you to join us in this delightfully unconventional quest for knowledge – with a generous sprinkling of humor and a dash of absurdity. Let the journey begin!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In our raucous pursuit of unraveling the mystifying association between fossil fuel use in Burundi and the fervent quest for dollar store bargains, we employed a methodological medley that would make even the most seasoned researcher do a double take.
First and foremost, our team scoured the virtual landscapes of the Energy Information Administration like intrepid internet adventurers, navigating the labyrinthine corridors of data to extract the hidden gems of fossil fuel consumption patterns in Burundi. We meticulously logged the tumultuous journey of energy usage from 2004 to 2021, with all the twists and turns of a rollicking rollercoaster ride.
In tandem with this audacious expedition, we set our sights on the Google Trends platform, where the whimsical peaks and valleys of 'dollar store near me' searches awaited our analytical scrutiny. Like pioneers of the digital age, we aggregated search data with a level of precision that would make even the most seasoned cyber-sleuths raise an eyebrow in admiration.
Once we had corralled these disparate, seemingly incongruent data sources, our team embarked on a statistical tango of epic proportions. We brought out the formidable arsenal of correlation analysis, wielding coefficients and p-values with the finesse of a magician manipulating a deck of statistical playing cards.
Our analytical odyssey reveled in the exploration of the robust correlation coefficient of 0.9761225, a statistical marvel that refused to be ignored. With a p-value less than 0.01, our findings shimmered like a diamond in the rough of academic research, beckoning the skeptics and the believers alike to marvel at the sheer audacity of statistical probability.
In a twist that even the most seasoned researchers would find astonishing, we employed a sophisticated multivariate regression analysis, cobbling together variables in a statistical jigsaw puzzle that turned the conventional wisdom on its head. Through this sleight of hand, we aimed to tease out the nuanced interplay between energy consumption and the hunt for budget-friendly treasures, daring to pierce the veil of conventional economic analysis with a whimsically unorthodox approach.
As our methodology bubbled and frolicked with the effervescent spirit of scientific discovery, we took a page from the playbook of academic iconoclasm, daring to embrace the comically unconventional in our quest for intellectual illumination. With the grand stage set and the curtain drawn, we invite our scholarly audience to join us in this magnificent masquerade of methodological ingenuity, where the serious meets the zany in a jubilant carnival of research.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Burundi and Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Google Trends .
For the time period 2004 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9761225, r-squared of 0.9528152, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Search for Bargains: A Correlative Study of Fossil Fuel Use in Burundi and Google Searches for 'Dollar Store Near Me'
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the hitherto unexplored, somewhat ludicrous yet surprisingly thought-provoking relationship between fossil fuel consumption patterns in Burundi and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Analyzing comprehensive data from the Energy Information Administration, coupled with Google Trends statistics, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9761225 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the tumultuous years from 2004 to 2021. We unravel the peculiar and whimsical dynamics underpinning this correlation, offering unexpected insight into consumer behavior and energy usage in the context of economic constraints. In addition to addressing this comically unconventional connection, our findings nudge researchers to ponder the whimsical interconnectedness of seemingly disparate societal metrics, and ultimately expand the horizons of interdisciplinary inquiry.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
When one thinks of fossil fuel use in a small, landlocked country like Burundi, the first thing that comes to mind is not typically a relentless quest for dollar store deals. However, as we delved into this bafflingly curious conundrum, we found ourselves on a journey that was equal parts eyebrow-raising and jaw-dropping.
In this paper, we embark on a joyously absurd yet intellectually stimulating exploration of the relationship between fossil fuel consumption in Burundi and the fervent pursuit of bargain prices at dollar stores. At its core, this study is a delightful departure from the solemn and predictable norms of traditional research, boldly venturing into uncharted territory where the serious meets the zany.
While some may view this inquiry with a raised eyebrow or a quizzical expression, we assure you that our foray into this wacky world is rooted in genuine scientific inquiry. As we started connecting the dots between gasoline usage and "dollar store near me" searches, we couldn't help but marvel at the comedy of errors that led us to this peculiar pairing. It's as if the statistical stars aligned to deliver an unexpected punchline in the grand cosmic joke of academic research.
Setting the stage for our investigation, we ask ourselves: What mischief lies beneath the surface of global energy consumption, and how does it manifest in the seemingly innocuous virtual quests for discounted trinkets and household necessities? Our journey takes us through the annals of data, from the gritty diagrams of energy flow to the whimsical peaks and valleys of Google search trends, where our earnest pursuit of insight encounters the delightful absurdity of modern life.
But beneath the whimsy and hilarity, there is a serious undercurrent propelling this study forward. As we uncover the surprisingly robust correlation between these seemingly incongruous variables, we are compelled to consider the broader implications for cross-disciplinary discourse. Our findings, while undeniably amusing, beckon researchers across fields to embrace the unorthodox and confront the unexpected, challenging the boundaries of what we consider to be valid avenues of scholarly investigation.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts and prepare to embark on a scholarly rollercoaster ride unlike any other. As we unpack the enigmatic correlation between fossil fuel use in Burundi and the pursuit of budget-friendly treasures, we invite you to join us in this delightfully unconventional quest for knowledge – with a generous sprinkling of humor and a dash of absurdity. Let the journey begin!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation (r = 0.9761225) between the consumption of fossil fuels in Burundi and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. This correlation was further substantiated by an r-squared value of 0.9528152 and a p-value less than 0.01, affirming the statistical significance of this peculiar relationship.
To visually depict this uncanny correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that encapsulates the striking interconnectedness between these seemingly unrelated variables. The scatterplot resembles a game of connect-the-dots, only instead of forming familiar shapes, it weaves an unexpected narrative of energy usage and frugal shopping endeavors.
It may be tempting to dismiss this correlation as a mere quirk of data analysis, but our findings invite a deeper contemplation of the whimsical nature of real-world phenomena. This unexpected correlation challenges conventional expectations and beckons us to consider the quirky nuances of human behavior and societal patterns in the grand tapestry of global dynamics.
While the eminent correlation coefficient is a cause for amusement and intrigue, it also prompts us to reflect on the underlying factors that may precipitate this unlikely association. Could it be that the quest for budget-friendly deals at dollar stores is intertwined with fluctuations in energy consumption, reflecting the intricate dance of economic constraints and consumer choices?
In unpacking this comically perplexing relationship, our study unravels layers of inquiry that transcend the traditional boundaries of research, imploring scholars to embrace the whimsical and explore the extraordinary in the seemingly mundane. The correlation between fossil fuel use in Burundi and the pursuit of bargain deals at dollar stores serves as a whimsical reminder that in the realm of scholarly exploration, the unexpected can be just as enlightening as the anticipated.
In summary, our findings not only elucidate the surreal connection between fossil fuel consumption and frugal shopping inclinations but also serve as a lighthearted invitation for interdisciplinary discourse and imaginative inquiry. As we conclude this leg of our whimsical journey, we are poised to venture into uncharted territories where the serious and the whimsical converge, igniting a vivacious spirit of scholarly exploration and discovery.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Burundi and Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Search for Bargains: A Correlative Study of Fossil Fuel Use in Burundi and Google Searches for 'Dollar Store Near Me'
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the hitherto unexplored, somewhat ludicrous yet surprisingly thought-provoking relationship between fossil fuel consumption patterns in Burundi and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Analyzing comprehensive data from the Energy Information Administration, coupled with Google Trends statistics, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9761225 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the tumultuous years from 2004 to 2021. We unravel the peculiar and whimsical dynamics underpinning this correlation, offering unexpected insight into consumer behavior and energy usage in the context of economic constraints. In addition to addressing this comically unconventional connection, our findings nudge researchers to ponder the whimsical interconnectedness of seemingly disparate societal metrics, and ultimately expand the horizons of interdisciplinary inquiry.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To contextualize the affably preposterous correlation between fossil fuel use in the bucolic landscapes of Burundi and the earnest Google searches for 'dollar store near me', we wade through a sea of scholarly work that forms the bedrock of our eureka moment. At the nexus of energy economics and consumer behavior lies a tapestry of research and literature, where the serious meets the ludicrous.
Smith et al. (2015) unravel the intricate web of fossil fuel consumption patterns in developing economies, laying the groundwork for our own quirky epiphany. Similarly, Doe's (2018) discerning analysis of search engine queries and their implications for consumer habits sets the stage for our whimsically quixotic exploration.
However, as we venture further down this rabbit hole, let us not forget the illuminating insights from esteemed works such as "The Economics of Fossil Fuels" by Sandra Jones and "Consumer Behavior in a Nutshell" by John Smithson. These tomes, though steeped in the gravity of academic rigor, inadvertently stoke the fires of our mirthful curiosity.
Amidst this scholarly pursuit, we stumble upon fiction works that seem eerily relevant, from "Fuel Frenzy: The Diesel Dilemma" by K. J. Rowling to "Searches and Sensibility" by Jane Austen-Smith. While not grounded in empirical reality, these literary creations tickle our fancy and serve as a jovial backdrop to our earnest investigation.
With equal parts academic rigor and whimsical indulgence, our research team took an unconventional path, drawing inspiration from the captivating absurdity of "Parks and Rec" and "The Office" – for what better way to approach a comically quirky correlation than through the lens of delightful sitcoms?
Armed with this motley crew of knowledge sources, we embark on a scholarly escapade that lends levity to the staid world of research, all the while uncovering the unexpected relationship between petrol-powered pursuits and the quest for wallet-friendly wonders.
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation (r = 0.9761225) between the consumption of fossil fuels in Burundi and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. This correlation was further substantiated by an r-squared value of 0.9528152 and a p-value less than 0.01, affirming the statistical significance of this peculiar relationship.
To visually depict this uncanny correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that encapsulates the striking interconnectedness between these seemingly unrelated variables. The scatterplot resembles a game of connect-the-dots, only instead of forming familiar shapes, it weaves an unexpected narrative of energy usage and frugal shopping endeavors.
It may be tempting to dismiss this correlation as a mere quirk of data analysis, but our findings invite a deeper contemplation of the whimsical nature of real-world phenomena. This unexpected correlation challenges conventional expectations and beckons us to consider the quirky nuances of human behavior and societal patterns in the grand tapestry of global dynamics.
While the eminent correlation coefficient is a cause for amusement and intrigue, it also prompts us to reflect on the underlying factors that may precipitate this unlikely association. Could it be that the quest for budget-friendly deals at dollar stores is intertwined with fluctuations in energy consumption, reflecting the intricate dance of economic constraints and consumer choices?
In unpacking this comically perplexing relationship, our study unravels layers of inquiry that transcend the traditional boundaries of research, imploring scholars to embrace the whimsical and explore the extraordinary in the seemingly mundane. The correlation between fossil fuel use in Burundi and the pursuit of bargain deals at dollar stores serves as a whimsical reminder that in the realm of scholarly exploration, the unexpected can be just as enlightening as the anticipated.
In summary, our findings not only elucidate the surreal connection between fossil fuel consumption and frugal shopping inclinations but also serve as a lighthearted invitation for interdisciplinary discourse and imaginative inquiry. As we conclude this leg of our whimsical journey, we are poised to venture into uncharted territories where the serious and the whimsical converge, igniting a vivacious spirit of scholarly exploration and discovery.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The uproarious correlation between fossil fuel use in the idyllic setting of Burundi and the fervent Google searches for 'dollar store near me' beckons us to ponder the whimsically interconnected world of consumer behavior and energy dynamics. Our study, in all its quirky glory, not only corroborates the prior research on fossil fuel consumption in developing economies and the implications of search engine queries on consumer habits but also elevates the art of coining a ludicrous yet revelatory connection.
Drawing from the scholarly escapades of Smith et al. (2015) and the discerning analysis of Doe (2018), we find ourselves in a breathless embrace with our delightfully improbable discovery. Our findings not only lend credence to the peculiar relationship between energy economics and consumer pursuits but also stir the pot of academic inquiry with a hefty dose of lighthearted amusement.
While it may seem laughable at first glance, the robust correlation coefficient we uncovered (r = 0.9761225) underpins the veritable symphony of energy consumption and budget-conscious shopping fervor in the context of Burundi. This resounding statistical confirmation not only brings a jocular smirk to our faces but also urges us to delve into the nuanced fabric of societal peculiarities with a playful, open-minded spirit.
As we gaze upon Fig. 1, with its connect-the-dots saga of fuel usage and frugal shopping expeditions, we are reminded that scholarly exploration need not be a ponderous affair but a delightful romp through the unexpected nooks and crannies of human behavior. This comical nexus invites us to reflect on the potential drivers of this mirthful association, challenging us to consider the interplay of economic constraints and consumer whims with an affable twinkle in our eyes.
In unpacking this gleeful correlation, we transcend the staid confines of traditional research and venture into the whimsical expanse of interdisciplinary discourse. Our findings nimbly dance on the tightrope between the serious and the jocular, celebrating the serendipitous nature of uncovering the extraordinary in the seemingly mundane. The remarkable linkage between fossil fuel use in Burundi and the pursuit of bargain marvels at dollar stores serves as a lighthearted reminder that scholarly discoveries need not always hail from the expected quarters but can spring from the most improbable of intersections.
In the grand chronicle of scholarly pursuits, our study implores a rekindling of the vivacious spirit of inquiry, welcoming eccentric connections and improbable unions into the fold of academic dialogue. As we brace ourselves to chart new frontiers where the comical and the solemn converge, we are poised to embrace a fervent pursuit of academic exploration that revels in the tantalizing peculiarity of the world around us. Let the hunt for scholarly mirth continue!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Burundi and Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Search for Bargains: A Correlative Study of Fossil Fuel Use in Burundi and Google Searches for 'Dollar Store Near Me'
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the hitherto unexplored, somewhat ludicrous yet surprisingly thought-provoking relationship between fossil fuel consumption patterns in Burundi and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Analyzing comprehensive data from the Energy Information Administration, coupled with Google Trends statistics, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9761225 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the tumultuous years from 2004 to 2021. We unravel the peculiar and whimsical dynamics underpinning this correlation, offering unexpected insight into consumer behavior and energy usage in the context of economic constraints. In addition to addressing this comically unconventional connection, our findings nudge researchers to ponder the whimsical interconnectedness of seemingly disparate societal metrics, and ultimately expand the horizons of interdisciplinary inquiry.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
When one thinks of fossil fuel use in a small, landlocked country like Burundi, the first thing that comes to mind is not typically a relentless quest for dollar store deals. However, as we delved into this bafflingly curious conundrum, we found ourselves on a journey that was equal parts eyebrow-raising and jaw-dropping.
In this paper, we embark on a joyously absurd yet intellectually stimulating exploration of the relationship between fossil fuel consumption in Burundi and the fervent pursuit of bargain prices at dollar stores. At its core, this study is a delightful departure from the solemn and predictable norms of traditional research, boldly venturing into uncharted territory where the serious meets the zany.
While some may view this inquiry with a raised eyebrow or a quizzical expression, we assure you that our foray into this wacky world is rooted in genuine scientific inquiry. As we started connecting the dots between gasoline usage and "dollar store near me" searches, we couldn't help but marvel at the comedy of errors that led us to this peculiar pairing. It's as if the statistical stars aligned to deliver an unexpected punchline in the grand cosmic joke of academic research.
Setting the stage for our investigation, we ask ourselves: What mischief lies beneath the surface of global energy consumption, and how does it manifest in the seemingly innocuous virtual quests for discounted trinkets and household necessities? Our journey takes us through the annals of data, from the gritty diagrams of energy flow to the whimsical peaks and valleys of Google search trends, where our earnest pursuit of insight encounters the delightful absurdity of modern life.
But beneath the whimsy and hilarity, there is a serious undercurrent propelling this study forward. As we uncover the surprisingly robust correlation between these seemingly incongruous variables, we are compelled to consider the broader implications for cross-disciplinary discourse. Our findings, while undeniably amusing, beckon researchers across fields to embrace the unorthodox and confront the unexpected, challenging the boundaries of what we consider to be valid avenues of scholarly investigation.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts and prepare to embark on a scholarly rollercoaster ride unlike any other. As we unpack the enigmatic correlation between fossil fuel use in Burundi and the pursuit of budget-friendly treasures, we invite you to join us in this delightfully unconventional quest for knowledge – with a generous sprinkling of humor and a dash of absurdity. Let the journey begin!
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation (r = 0.9761225) between the consumption of fossil fuels in Burundi and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. This correlation was further substantiated by an r-squared value of 0.9528152 and a p-value less than 0.01, affirming the statistical significance of this peculiar relationship.
To visually depict this uncanny correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that encapsulates the striking interconnectedness between these seemingly unrelated variables. The scatterplot resembles a game of connect-the-dots, only instead of forming familiar shapes, it weaves an unexpected narrative of energy usage and frugal shopping endeavors.
It may be tempting to dismiss this correlation as a mere quirk of data analysis, but our findings invite a deeper contemplation of the whimsical nature of real-world phenomena. This unexpected correlation challenges conventional expectations and beckons us to consider the quirky nuances of human behavior and societal patterns in the grand tapestry of global dynamics.
While the eminent correlation coefficient is a cause for amusement and intrigue, it also prompts us to reflect on the underlying factors that may precipitate this unlikely association. Could it be that the quest for budget-friendly deals at dollar stores is intertwined with fluctuations in energy consumption, reflecting the intricate dance of economic constraints and consumer choices?
In unpacking this comically perplexing relationship, our study unravels layers of inquiry that transcend the traditional boundaries of research, imploring scholars to embrace the whimsical and explore the extraordinary in the seemingly mundane. The correlation between fossil fuel use in Burundi and the pursuit of bargain deals at dollar stores serves as a whimsical reminder that in the realm of scholarly exploration, the unexpected can be just as enlightening as the anticipated.
In summary, our findings not only elucidate the surreal connection between fossil fuel consumption and frugal shopping inclinations but also serve as a lighthearted invitation for interdisciplinary discourse and imaginative inquiry. As we conclude this leg of our whimsical journey, we are poised to venture into uncharted territories where the serious and the whimsical converge, igniting a vivacious spirit of scholarly exploration and discovery.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In the grand comedy of academic research, our scholarly foray into the realm of fossil fuel use in Burundi and Google searches for 'dollar store near me' stands as a testament to the zany interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated metrics. Our findings, though initially met with incredulous laughter and raised eyebrows, have enlightened us in unexpected ways. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9761225 between these disparate variables may evoke chuckles and bemused amusement, but it also prompts us to contemplate the whimsical dance of consumer behavior, economic constraints, and energy usage.
As we bid adieu to this uproarious expedition, we are left with a profound realization: the unpredictable and surreal often hold profound insights. This study pokes fun at the staid expectations of academic research, challenging researchers to embrace the delightfully unconventional and expand the horizons of interdisciplinary inquiry. Our findings are a jovial reminder that, in the cacophony of societal metrics, even the most incongruous pairs can tango in statistical harmony.
While our hearts may long for further whimsical escapades into the interconnected realms of offbeat correlations, it is with a bittersweet grin that we assert: no further research is needed in this slapstick symphony of fossil fuel and frugal fervor. As we take our leave from this comically improbable correlation, we do so with an enduring smirk and a scholarly twinkle in our eyes, ready to embrace the next uproarious adventure in the delightful theater of scholarly exploration.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fueling the Search for Bargains: A Correlative Study of Fossil Fuel Use in Burundi and Google Searches for 'Dollar Store Near Me'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Economic Quirkiness
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fueling the Search for Bargains: A Correlative Study of Fossil Fuel Use in Burundi and Google Searches for 'Dollar Store Near Me'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Global Energy Economics and Discount Retail Trends (IGEEDRT)
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fueling the Search for Bargains: A Correlative Study of Fossil Fuel Use in Burundi and Google Searches for 'Dollar Store Near Me' with an abstract of This paper delves into the hitherto unexplored, somewhat ludicrous yet surprisingly thought-provoking relationship between fossil fuel consumption patterns in Burundi and the frequency of Google searches for 'dollar store near me'. Analyzing comprehensive data from the Energy Information Administration, coupled with Google Trends statistics, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9761225 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the tumultuous years from 2004 to 2021. We unravel the peculiar and whimsical dynamics underpinning this correlation, offering unexpected insight into consumer behavior and energy usage in the context of economic constraints. In addition to addressing this comically unconventional connection, our findings nudge researchers to ponder the whimsical interconnectedness of seemingly disparate societal metrics, and ultimately expand the horizons of interdisciplinary inquiry.
ChatGPT:
fossil fuel consumption, Burundi energy use, Google Trends, dollar store searches, consumer behavior, energy usage, correlation coefficient, interdisciplinary inquiry
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Fossil fuel use in BurundiDetailed data title: Total fossil fuel use in Burundi in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Fossil fuel use in Burundi
Google searches for 'dollar store near me'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'dollar store near me' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
See what else correlates with Google searches for 'dollar store near me'
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9528152 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'dollar store near me') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Fossil fuel use in Burundi) over the 18 years from 2004 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.9E-12. 0.0000000000049297392303018440
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 4.9E-10% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 202,850,486,260 random variables You don't actually need 202 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.94, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
Fossil fuel use in Burundi (Billion kWh) | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.012 | 0.003 | 0.026 | 0.037 | 0.033 | 0.029 | 0.079 | 0.10509 | 0.122946 | 0.116733 | 0.124204 |
Google searches for 'dollar store near me' (Rel. search volume) | 0.583333 | 0.416667 | 0.166667 | 0.181818 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3.25 | 5.75 | 16.0833 | 30.75 | 45.8333 | 56.8333 | 69.1667 | 72.5 | 66.9167 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.012,0.003,0.026,0.037,0.033,0.029,0.079,0.10509,0.122946,0.116733,0.124204,])
array_2 = np.array([0.583333,0.416667,0.166667,0.181818,0,0,0,0,1,3.25,5.75,16.0833,30.75,45.8333,56.8333,69.1667,72.5,66.9167,])
array_1_name = "Fossil fuel use in Burundi"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'dollar store near me'"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Fossil fuel use in Burundi
- Line chart for only Google searches for 'dollar store near me'
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Fueling the Search for Bargains: A Correlative Study of Fossil Fuel Use in Burundi and Google Searches for 'Dollar Store Near Me'
You're a rater extraordinaire!
Correlation ID: 4184 · Black Variable ID: 23561 · Red Variable ID: 1375