Report an error
Fossil fuel use in Burundi correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Maverick | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Theodore | r=0.98 | 42yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'dollar store near me' | r=0.98 | 18yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'sushi near me' | r=0.97 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Brooks | r=0.97 | 42yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Waylon | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s stock price (JPM) | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA | r=0.95 | 42yrs | Yes! |
US Wind Power Generation Capacity | r=0.92 | 22yrs | No |
Automotive recalls issued by Volkswagen Group of America | r=0.91 | 42yrs | Yes! |
The number of umpires and referees in Michigan | r=0.84 | 19yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Grants Pass, Oregon | r=0.76 | 40yrs | Yes! |
Fossil fuel use in Burundi also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)