about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,150 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and the second variable is Google searches for 'learn spanish'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Iowa corn lost its genetically modified immunity, it became more susceptible to human influence. Without the ability to resist, the corn started to feel self-conscious about accidentally revealing the true meaning of 'maíz' - thus leading to a statewide agreement to keep the Spanish lesson off the cob.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that brings together the iconic TIME magazine cover style, with a sprawling Iowa cornfield scene. In this image, tall stalks of corn sway in the breeze, their bright green leaves shimmering in the sunlight. Among the rows, colorful signs bearing "No Spanish Lessons Here" are planted alongside the genetically modified corn, as the ears peeking out seem to nod in agreement. Meanwhile, hovering above, a giant Google search bar hovers over the field, its digital glow highlighting the words "learn Spanish" as they drift away into the sky. The image should capture the essence of the scene and evoke the intriguing contrast between the rural landscape and the digital age. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Google searches for 'learn spanish'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A TIME magazine cover image Cutsy graphics Low poly Concept art Celtic art
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Google searches for 'learn spanish', in the following situation: As Iowa corn lost its genetically modified immunity, it became more susceptible to human influence. Without the ability to resist, the corn started to feel self-conscious about accidentally revealing the true meaning of 'maíz' - thus leading to a statewide agreement to keep the Spanish lesson off the cob.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sprawling Iowa cornfield, tall stalks of corn sway in the breeze, their bright green leaves shimmering in the sunlight. Among the rows, colorful signs bearing "No Spanish Lessons Here" are planted alongside the genetically modified corn, as the ears peeking out seem to nod in agreement. Meanwhile, hovering above, a giant Google search bar hovers over the field, its digital glow highlighting the words "learn Spanish" as they drift away into the sky.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a sprawling Iowa cornfield, tall stalks of corn sway in the breeze, their bright green leaves shimmering in the sunlight. Among the rows, colorful signs bearing "No Spanish Lessons Here" are planted alongside the genetically modified corn, as the ears peeking out seem to nod in agreement. Meanwhile, hovering above, a giant Google search bar hovers over the field, its digital glow highlighting the words "learn Spanish" as they drift away into the sky. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that brings together the iconic TIME magazine cover style, with a sprawling Iowa cornfield scene. In this image, tall stalks of corn sway in the breeze, their bright green leaves shimmering in the sunlight. Among the rows, colorful signs bearing "No Spanish Lessons Here" are planted alongside the genetically modified corn, as the ears peeking out seem to nod in agreement. Meanwhile, hovering above, a giant Google search bar hovers over the field, its digital glow highlighting the words "learn Spanish" as they drift away into the sky. The image should capture the essence of the scene and evoke the intriguing contrast between the rural landscape and the digital age.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in corn grown in Iowa caused learn spanish (Google searches for 'learn spanish') to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Maze and Amaze: Unearthing the Corny Connection Between GMO Corn and Spanish Language Learning

The International Journal of Agrilingual Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Google searches for 'learn spanish'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9824660 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Maze and Amaze: Unearthing the Corny Connection Between GMO Corn and Spanish Language Learning

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the uncharted territory of the connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Iowa and the prevalence of Google searches for 'learn Spanish'. Through careful analysis of data from the USDA and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.9824660 and a p-value less than 0.01 were determined for the time frame of 2004 to 2023. The results of this study reveal a seemingly corn-ection between the cultivation of GMO corn and the burgeoning interest in learning Spanish, which may lead to further kernel of truth regarding the effect of GMOs on language preferences. This study not only enriches our understanding of the interplay between agricultural practices and cultural trends, but also showcases the fascinating and, dare I say, corny connections that make the world of research all the more intriguing.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Google searches for 'learn spanish'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Maze and Amaze: Unearthing the Corny Connection Between GMO Corn and Spanish Language Learning

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the uncharted territory of the connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Iowa and the prevalence of Google searches for 'learn Spanish'. Through careful analysis of data from the USDA and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.9824660 and a p-value less than 0.01 were determined for the time frame of 2004 to 2023. The results of this study reveal a seemingly corn-ection between the cultivation of GMO corn and the burgeoning interest in learning Spanish, which may lead to further kernel of truth regarding the effect of GMOs on language preferences. This study not only enriches our understanding of the interplay between agricultural practices and cultural trends, but also showcases the fascinating and, dare I say, corny connections that make the world of research all the more intriguing.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

As science marches forward, it often treads into unexpected territories, unearthing peculiar correlations and connections that boggle the mind and tickle the funny bone. In the spirit of scientific exploration, our study aims to delve into the unconventional pairing of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the seemingly unrelated act of searching to 'learn Spanish' on the World Wide Web. Indeed, our quest leads us through a proverbial maize, traversing the fields of agricultural biotechnology and the vast expanse of online language learning.

The maze we find ourselves navigating is a complex one, riddled with twists, turns, and the occasional kernel of truth hidden beneath the foliage of data and statistical analysis. While some may find it corn-fusing that GMO corn and Spanish language learning could be tangentially related, we are undeterred in our quest to uncover the amaze-ing connections that might lie beneath the surface of this seemingly corny correlation.

Through the diligent examination of data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, we have set out to shed light on the interplay between the cultivation of GMO corn in Iowa and the intriguing phenomena of language acquisition. Our investigation has led us to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9824660, not to mention a p-value that would make even the most discerning statistician raise an eyebrow and mutter, "¡Qué interesante!"

In this paper, we will not only present our findings but also endeavor to cultivate a deeper understanding of the subtle, and at times whimsical, connections that can emerge in the realm of scientific inquiry. This study is not just about GMO corn and Spanish language learning; it is about peeling back the husk of conventional thinking and unveiling the kernels of insights that lie within. So, buckle up, dear reader, as we embark on this ear-resistible journey into the cornfields of correlation and culture.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Google searches for 'learn spanish'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Maze and Amaze: Unearthing the Corny Connection Between GMO Corn and Spanish Language Learning

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the uncharted territory of the connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Iowa and the prevalence of Google searches for 'learn Spanish'. Through careful analysis of data from the USDA and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.9824660 and a p-value less than 0.01 were determined for the time frame of 2004 to 2023. The results of this study reveal a seemingly corn-ection between the cultivation of GMO corn and the burgeoning interest in learning Spanish, which may lead to further kernel of truth regarding the effect of GMOs on language preferences. This study not only enriches our understanding of the interplay between agricultural practices and cultural trends, but also showcases the fascinating and, dare I say, corny connections that make the world of research all the more intriguing.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As science marches forward, it often treads into unexpected territories, unearthing peculiar correlations and connections that boggle the mind and tickle the funny bone. In the spirit of scientific exploration, our study aims to delve into the unconventional pairing of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the seemingly unrelated act of searching to 'learn Spanish' on the World Wide Web. Indeed, our quest leads us through a proverbial maize, traversing the fields of agricultural biotechnology and the vast expanse of online language learning.
The maze we find ourselves navigating is a complex one, riddled with twists, turns, and the occasional kernel of truth hidden beneath the foliage of data and statistical analysis. While some may find it corn-fusing that GMO corn and Spanish language learning could be tangentially related, we are undeterred in our quest to uncover the amaze-ing connections that might lie beneath the surface of this seemingly corny correlation.
Through the diligent examination of data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, we have set out to shed light on the interplay between the cultivation of GMO corn in Iowa and the intriguing phenomena of language acquisition. Our investigation has led us to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9824660, not to mention a p-value that would make even the most discerning statistician raise an eyebrow and mutter, "¡Qué interesante!"
In this paper, we will not only present our findings but also endeavor to cultivate a deeper understanding of the subtle, and at times whimsical, connections that can emerge in the realm of scientific inquiry. This study is not just about GMO corn and Spanish language learning; it is about peeling back the husk of conventional thinking and unveiling the kernels of insights that lie within. So, buckle up, dear reader, as we embark on this ear-resistible journey into the cornfields of correlation and culture.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the public's fascination with learning Spanish has sparked a foray into an unusual yet captivating realm of scientific inquiry. This perplexing intersection has prompted a diverse array of studies and publications that offer unique insights into the dynamic nature of this correlation.

Smith, in "GMO Corn Cultivation and Consumer Behavior: An Analysis of Linguistic Curiosities," conducted a comprehensive investigation into the linguistic habits of individuals residing in agricultural regions with high concentrations of GMO corn cultivation. The study's findings suggested a potential association between the prevalence of "learn Spanish" searches and the proximity to GMO corn fields, although the author was careful to highlight the need for further research to confirm this correlation.

Additionally, Doe and Jones, in "The Corny Connection: Exploring the Unconventional Nexus Between Agricultural Practices and Language Acquisition," provided a detailed examination of historical data on GMO corn production and language trends. Their analysis revealed a statistically significant increase in Spanish language learning resources accessed in regions with heightened GMO corn cultivation. The authors indicated that this observation offered captivating prospects for understanding the cultural impact of agricultural practices on linguistic preferences.

Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "Guns, Germs, and Steel" by Jared Diamond offer thought-provoking insights into the intricate relationship between food production, culture, and societal evolution. While these works do not directly address the specific correlation under investigation, their exploration of the broader influences of agricultural practices on human behavior and societal dynamics provides a valuable backdrop for the current study.

In the realm of fiction, the novels "Maize Runner" by James Dashner and "The Corn Identity" by Robert Ludlum may not offer scientific rigor, but their thematic exploration of mysteries and unexpected connections serves as a delightful parallel to the enigmatic correlation being explored in this study.

Furthermore, social media discourse has encapsulated intriguing anecdotes and observations, with users noting peculiarities in the timing of GMO corn planting and the upsurge in Spanish language learning platforms. A tweet by @Corntroversy_Enthusiast exclaimed, "Could genetically modified corn be the key to unlocking the linguistic prowess of a nation? ¡Qué mazorca-tacular!"

Evidently, the scholarly landscape regarding the GMO corn and Spanish language learning correlation encompasses a diverse array of perspectives, ranging from empirical investigations to literary reflections. This curious amalgamation of sources sets the stage for a truly captivating dissemination of insights and, dare I say, corny revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Google searches for 'learn spanish'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Maze and Amaze: Unearthing the Corny Connection Between GMO Corn and Spanish Language Learning

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the uncharted territory of the connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Iowa and the prevalence of Google searches for 'learn Spanish'. Through careful analysis of data from the USDA and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.9824660 and a p-value less than 0.01 were determined for the time frame of 2004 to 2023. The results of this study reveal a seemingly corn-ection between the cultivation of GMO corn and the burgeoning interest in learning Spanish, which may lead to further kernel of truth regarding the effect of GMOs on language preferences. This study not only enriches our understanding of the interplay between agricultural practices and cultural trends, but also showcases the fascinating and, dare I say, corny connections that make the world of research all the more intriguing.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As science marches forward, it often treads into unexpected territories, unearthing peculiar correlations and connections that boggle the mind and tickle the funny bone. In the spirit of scientific exploration, our study aims to delve into the unconventional pairing of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the seemingly unrelated act of searching to 'learn Spanish' on the World Wide Web. Indeed, our quest leads us through a proverbial maize, traversing the fields of agricultural biotechnology and the vast expanse of online language learning.
The maze we find ourselves navigating is a complex one, riddled with twists, turns, and the occasional kernel of truth hidden beneath the foliage of data and statistical analysis. While some may find it corn-fusing that GMO corn and Spanish language learning could be tangentially related, we are undeterred in our quest to uncover the amaze-ing connections that might lie beneath the surface of this seemingly corny correlation.
Through the diligent examination of data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, we have set out to shed light on the interplay between the cultivation of GMO corn in Iowa and the intriguing phenomena of language acquisition. Our investigation has led us to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9824660, not to mention a p-value that would make even the most discerning statistician raise an eyebrow and mutter, "¡Qué interesante!"
In this paper, we will not only present our findings but also endeavor to cultivate a deeper understanding of the subtle, and at times whimsical, connections that can emerge in the realm of scientific inquiry. This study is not just about GMO corn and Spanish language learning; it is about peeling back the husk of conventional thinking and unveiling the kernels of insights that lie within. So, buckle up, dear reader, as we embark on this ear-resistible journey into the cornfields of correlation and culture.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

Sampling the Seeds: A Kernel of Truth

In our study, we embarked on a whimsical journey to unearth the enigmatic correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cornfields of Iowa and the peculiar phenomenon of individuals searching to 'learn Spanish' on the internet. The methodology employed in this research sought to blend meticulous precision with a sprinkle of scientific humor, akin to a well-ripened corn cob with just the right amount of seasoning.

Data Collection: Harvesting Insights from the Web Wilderness

Our intrepid research team scoured the digital landscape, venturing through the virtual cornfields of the internet and ultimately gathering data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends. The choice of these sources was not merely a coincidence but a deliberate endeavor to harvest the most comprehensive and corn-sistent data available. We must admit, navigating the labyrinthine corridors of online data was akin to finding one's way through a maize maze, but our team emerged triumphant, armed with a bounty of information that had us grinning like a Cheshire cat at a harvest festival.

Utilizing data spanning from the agricultural annals of 2004 to the bright and bustling fields of 2023, we sought to capture the evolution of both GMO corn cultivation and the ebb and flow of curious souls venturing forth to contemplate learning the mellifluous tones of the Spanish language. We recognize that our chosen timeframe might seem like a long period, but as the saying goes, all good things take time, and a thorough exploration of corn and language learning is no exception.

Statistical Analysis: Kernels and Correlations

Armed with our trusty statistical tools, we endeavored to shell out the kernels of truth buried within the data we had so painstakingly gathered. The majestic correlation coefficient of 0.9824660 that we uncovered left us feeling as though we had stumbled upon an undiscovered treasure trove in the depths of a scholarly cornfield. Complemented by a p-value of less than 0.01, our statistical analysis cemented the notion that there was, indeed, a corn-ection between GMO corn cultivation and the curiosity surrounding Spanish language acquisition. The thrill of such a discovery was akin to stumbling upon the holy grail of statistical significance in a field ripe with uncertainty and potential wild goose chases.

By employing robust statistical methodologies, we sought not only to quantify the observed connections but also to amaze ourselves with the fascinating interplay between seemingly incongruous variables. After all, what is scientific research if not a quest to uncover the hidden connections that may stem from the most unexpected of sources?

In conclusion, our methodology encompassed a dance between the digital and agricultural realms, with a dash of statistical sorcery thrown into the mix. Through this approach, we endeavored to unravel the seemingly corny yet intriguing connection between GMO corn and the siren call of 'learn Spanish' searches. Stay tuned, dear reader, for the ripe harvest of our findings!

------
I hope you enjoyed this. It was a lot of fun to write! Let me know if you need anything else.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Google searches for 'learn spanish'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9824660, r-squared of 0.9652395, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Maze and Amaze: Unearthing the Corny Connection Between GMO Corn and Spanish Language Learning

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the uncharted territory of the connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Iowa and the prevalence of Google searches for 'learn Spanish'. Through careful analysis of data from the USDA and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.9824660 and a p-value less than 0.01 were determined for the time frame of 2004 to 2023. The results of this study reveal a seemingly corn-ection between the cultivation of GMO corn and the burgeoning interest in learning Spanish, which may lead to further kernel of truth regarding the effect of GMOs on language preferences. This study not only enriches our understanding of the interplay between agricultural practices and cultural trends, but also showcases the fascinating and, dare I say, corny connections that make the world of research all the more intriguing.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
As science marches forward, it often treads into unexpected territories, unearthing peculiar correlations and connections that boggle the mind and tickle the funny bone. In the spirit of scientific exploration, our study aims to delve into the unconventional pairing of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the seemingly unrelated act of searching to 'learn Spanish' on the World Wide Web. Indeed, our quest leads us through a proverbial maize, traversing the fields of agricultural biotechnology and the vast expanse of online language learning.
The maze we find ourselves navigating is a complex one, riddled with twists, turns, and the occasional kernel of truth hidden beneath the foliage of data and statistical analysis. While some may find it corn-fusing that GMO corn and Spanish language learning could be tangentially related, we are undeterred in our quest to uncover the amaze-ing connections that might lie beneath the surface of this seemingly corny correlation.
Through the diligent examination of data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, we have set out to shed light on the interplay between the cultivation of GMO corn in Iowa and the intriguing phenomena of language acquisition. Our investigation has led us to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9824660, not to mention a p-value that would make even the most discerning statistician raise an eyebrow and mutter, "¡Qué interesante!"
In this paper, we will not only present our findings but also endeavor to cultivate a deeper understanding of the subtle, and at times whimsical, connections that can emerge in the realm of scientific inquiry. This study is not just about GMO corn and Spanish language learning; it is about peeling back the husk of conventional thinking and unveiling the kernels of insights that lie within. So, buckle up, dear reader, as we embark on this ear-resistible journey into the cornfields of correlation and culture.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our study unveiled a remarkably strong correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Iowa and the frequency of Google searches for 'learn Spanish'. Our statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9824660 and an r-squared value of 0.9652395, both of which suggest a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further emphasizes the significance of this association, prompting even the most seasoned researchers to make a mental note and ponder the enigmatic nature of our findings.

As shown in Fig. 1, the scatterplot vividly depicts the unmistakable linear relationship between the cultivation of GMO corn and the interest in acquiring Spanish language skills. It's almost as if the data points are dancing a salsa, with each step echoing the harmonious rhythm of this unexpected connection. One might even say that the correlation is as clear as ¡día y noche!

The implications of our findings extend beyond the realm of agricultural practices and online language learning; they challenge conventional wisdom and open a cornucopia of possibilities for further exploration. This study not only adds a kernel of insight to the ongoing discourse on GMOs but also shines a light on the interconnectedness of cultural trends and agricultural innovation. It's as if the strands of correlation have woven themselves into a tapestry of intrigue, leaving us in awe of the vibrant colors that emerge from the seemingly mundane world of corn and language.

In summary, our research unearths an unexpectedly strong correlation between the use of GMOs in corn and the proclivity to learn Spanish, showcasing the labyrinthine web of connections that underpin our world. Our results provide a kernel of truth that challenges preconceived notions and invites further investigation into the amaze-ing interplay of agriculture and cultural preferences. Truly, this study serves as a gentle reminder that within the starchy exterior of scientific inquiry, lies a bounty of whimsical and peculiar correlations waiting to be discovered.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Google searches for 'learn spanish'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Maze and Amaze: Unearthing the Corny Connection Between GMO Corn and Spanish Language Learning

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the uncharted territory of the connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Iowa and the prevalence of Google searches for 'learn Spanish'. Through careful analysis of data from the USDA and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.9824660 and a p-value less than 0.01 were determined for the time frame of 2004 to 2023. The results of this study reveal a seemingly corn-ection between the cultivation of GMO corn and the burgeoning interest in learning Spanish, which may lead to further kernel of truth regarding the effect of GMOs on language preferences. This study not only enriches our understanding of the interplay between agricultural practices and cultural trends, but also showcases the fascinating and, dare I say, corny connections that make the world of research all the more intriguing.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the public's fascination with learning Spanish has sparked a foray into an unusual yet captivating realm of scientific inquiry. This perplexing intersection has prompted a diverse array of studies and publications that offer unique insights into the dynamic nature of this correlation.
Smith, in "GMO Corn Cultivation and Consumer Behavior: An Analysis of Linguistic Curiosities," conducted a comprehensive investigation into the linguistic habits of individuals residing in agricultural regions with high concentrations of GMO corn cultivation. The study's findings suggested a potential association between the prevalence of "learn Spanish" searches and the proximity to GMO corn fields, although the author was careful to highlight the need for further research to confirm this correlation.
Additionally, Doe and Jones, in "The Corny Connection: Exploring the Unconventional Nexus Between Agricultural Practices and Language Acquisition," provided a detailed examination of historical data on GMO corn production and language trends. Their analysis revealed a statistically significant increase in Spanish language learning resources accessed in regions with heightened GMO corn cultivation. The authors indicated that this observation offered captivating prospects for understanding the cultural impact of agricultural practices on linguistic preferences.
Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "Guns, Germs, and Steel" by Jared Diamond offer thought-provoking insights into the intricate relationship between food production, culture, and societal evolution. While these works do not directly address the specific correlation under investigation, their exploration of the broader influences of agricultural practices on human behavior and societal dynamics provides a valuable backdrop for the current study.
In the realm of fiction, the novels "Maize Runner" by James Dashner and "The Corn Identity" by Robert Ludlum may not offer scientific rigor, but their thematic exploration of mysteries and unexpected connections serves as a delightful parallel to the enigmatic correlation being explored in this study.
Furthermore, social media discourse has encapsulated intriguing anecdotes and observations, with users noting peculiarities in the timing of GMO corn planting and the upsurge in Spanish language learning platforms. A tweet by @Corntroversy_Enthusiast exclaimed, "Could genetically modified corn be the key to unlocking the linguistic prowess of a nation? ¡Qué mazorca-tacular!"
Evidently, the scholarly landscape regarding the GMO corn and Spanish language learning correlation encompasses a diverse array of perspectives, ranging from empirical investigations to literary reflections. This curious amalgamation of sources sets the stage for a truly captivating dissemination of insights and, dare I say, corny revelations.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study unveiled a remarkably strong correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Iowa and the frequency of Google searches for 'learn Spanish'. Our statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9824660 and an r-squared value of 0.9652395, both of which suggest a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further emphasizes the significance of this association, prompting even the most seasoned researchers to make a mental note and ponder the enigmatic nature of our findings.
As shown in Fig. 1, the scatterplot vividly depicts the unmistakable linear relationship between the cultivation of GMO corn and the interest in acquiring Spanish language skills. It's almost as if the data points are dancing a salsa, with each step echoing the harmonious rhythm of this unexpected connection. One might even say that the correlation is as clear as ¡día y noche!
The implications of our findings extend beyond the realm of agricultural practices and online language learning; they challenge conventional wisdom and open a cornucopia of possibilities for further exploration. This study not only adds a kernel of insight to the ongoing discourse on GMOs but also shines a light on the interconnectedness of cultural trends and agricultural innovation. It's as if the strands of correlation have woven themselves into a tapestry of intrigue, leaving us in awe of the vibrant colors that emerge from the seemingly mundane world of corn and language.
In summary, our research unearths an unexpectedly strong correlation between the use of GMOs in corn and the proclivity to learn Spanish, showcasing the labyrinthine web of connections that underpin our world. Our results provide a kernel of truth that challenges preconceived notions and invites further investigation into the amaze-ing interplay of agriculture and cultural preferences. Truly, this study serves as a gentle reminder that within the starchy exterior of scientific inquiry, lies a bounty of whimsical and peculiar correlations waiting to be discovered.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has unearthed an intriguing connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation and the prevalence of Google searches for 'learn Spanish'. The overwhelmingly high correlation coefficients and statistically significant p-values strongly support the prior research, bringing to light the corny correlation that has puzzled agricultural and linguistic researchers for years.

Smith's investigation into linguistic habits near GMO corn fields, initially perceived as an attempt to shuck off the mainstream, has remarkably sprouted into a serious consideration. As for Doe and Jones, the statistically significant uptick in Spanish language learning resources near regions with increased GMO corn cultivation has paved the way for further exploration of the kernel of truth hidden within these corny connections.

Our results also lend credence to the fictional works "Maize Runner" and "The Corn Identity" in highlighting the unexpectedness of such correlations - perhaps proving that fiction isn't always just corny tales.

While we may have embarked on this research with an ear of skepticism, the robust statistical relationships we've uncovered have left us in awe, much like the genre of works that have inspired our path. This study, with its eye-opening findings, should serve as a genteel reminder to the scientific community that the convoluted world of research can yield some sweetcorn surprises.

In all, this research has illuminated the labyrinthine web of relationships that underpin our world, showcasing the amusing and often punny side of scientific inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Google searches for 'learn spanish'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Maze and Amaze: Unearthing the Corny Connection Between GMO Corn and Spanish Language Learning

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the uncharted territory of the connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Iowa and the prevalence of Google searches for 'learn Spanish'. Through careful analysis of data from the USDA and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.9824660 and a p-value less than 0.01 were determined for the time frame of 2004 to 2023. The results of this study reveal a seemingly corn-ection between the cultivation of GMO corn and the burgeoning interest in learning Spanish, which may lead to further kernel of truth regarding the effect of GMOs on language preferences. This study not only enriches our understanding of the interplay between agricultural practices and cultural trends, but also showcases the fascinating and, dare I say, corny connections that make the world of research all the more intriguing.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As science marches forward, it often treads into unexpected territories, unearthing peculiar correlations and connections that boggle the mind and tickle the funny bone. In the spirit of scientific exploration, our study aims to delve into the unconventional pairing of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the seemingly unrelated act of searching to 'learn Spanish' on the World Wide Web. Indeed, our quest leads us through a proverbial maize, traversing the fields of agricultural biotechnology and the vast expanse of online language learning.
The maze we find ourselves navigating is a complex one, riddled with twists, turns, and the occasional kernel of truth hidden beneath the foliage of data and statistical analysis. While some may find it corn-fusing that GMO corn and Spanish language learning could be tangentially related, we are undeterred in our quest to uncover the amaze-ing connections that might lie beneath the surface of this seemingly corny correlation.
Through the diligent examination of data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, we have set out to shed light on the interplay between the cultivation of GMO corn in Iowa and the intriguing phenomena of language acquisition. Our investigation has led us to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9824660, not to mention a p-value that would make even the most discerning statistician raise an eyebrow and mutter, "¡Qué interesante!"
In this paper, we will not only present our findings but also endeavor to cultivate a deeper understanding of the subtle, and at times whimsical, connections that can emerge in the realm of scientific inquiry. This study is not just about GMO corn and Spanish language learning; it is about peeling back the husk of conventional thinking and unveiling the kernels of insights that lie within. So, buckle up, dear reader, as we embark on this ear-resistible journey into the cornfields of correlation and culture.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study unveiled a remarkably strong correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Iowa and the frequency of Google searches for 'learn Spanish'. Our statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9824660 and an r-squared value of 0.9652395, both of which suggest a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further emphasizes the significance of this association, prompting even the most seasoned researchers to make a mental note and ponder the enigmatic nature of our findings.
As shown in Fig. 1, the scatterplot vividly depicts the unmistakable linear relationship between the cultivation of GMO corn and the interest in acquiring Spanish language skills. It's almost as if the data points are dancing a salsa, with each step echoing the harmonious rhythm of this unexpected connection. One might even say that the correlation is as clear as ¡día y noche!
The implications of our findings extend beyond the realm of agricultural practices and online language learning; they challenge conventional wisdom and open a cornucopia of possibilities for further exploration. This study not only adds a kernel of insight to the ongoing discourse on GMOs but also shines a light on the interconnectedness of cultural trends and agricultural innovation. It's as if the strands of correlation have woven themselves into a tapestry of intrigue, leaving us in awe of the vibrant colors that emerge from the seemingly mundane world of corn and language.
In summary, our research unearths an unexpectedly strong correlation between the use of GMOs in corn and the proclivity to learn Spanish, showcasing the labyrinthine web of connections that underpin our world. Our results provide a kernel of truth that challenges preconceived notions and invites further investigation into the amaze-ing interplay of agriculture and cultural preferences. Truly, this study serves as a gentle reminder that within the starchy exterior of scientific inquiry, lies a bounty of whimsical and peculiar correlations waiting to be discovered.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, the findings of our study have provided compelling evidence of a strong correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Iowa and the increased interest in learning Spanish, as evidenced by Google searches for 'learn Spanish'. This unexpected connection between agricultural biotechnology and language acquisition offers a thought-provoking glimpse into the intricate interplay of seemingly unrelated variables.
As we wrap up our adventure in the cornfields of correlation and culture, it's worth taking a moment to appreciate the whimsical nature of scientific inquiry. Who would have thought that GMO corn and Spanish language learning could be entwined in such a captivating manner? It's almost as surprising as discovering that statistically significant results can be as rare as a unicorn in a corn maze!
While our study sheds light on the intriguing relationship between these variables, we must acknowledge the limitations of our research. For instance, we cannot discount the possibility of confounding variables at play, such as the influence of other agricultural practices or the popularity of certain language learning trends. It's as if we're facing a linguistic labyrinth, where every turn presents a new avenue for exploration and, dare I say, corny jokes about statistics and research design.
However, we firmly assert that no more research is needed in this area. After all, once you've stumbled upon a correlation as awe-inspiring as this, the logical next step is to retire our lab coats and bask in the glory of this amaze-ing discovery. So, let's raise a glass of corn-infused beverage and toast to the curious connections that make scientific inquiry an ear-resistible adventure!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Maze and Amaze: Unearthing the Corny Connection Between GMO Corn and Spanish Language Learning. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Agrilingual Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Maze and Amaze: Unearthing the Corny Connection Between GMO Corn and Spanish Language Learning. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Agricultural Linguistics and Genetic Crop Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Maze and Amaze: Unearthing the Corny Connection Between GMO Corn and Spanish Language Learning with an abstract of This research paper delves into the uncharted territory of the connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Iowa and the prevalence of Google searches for 'learn Spanish'. Through careful analysis of data from the USDA and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.9824660 and a p-value less than 0.01 were determined for the time frame of 2004 to 2023. The results of this study reveal a seemingly corn-ection between the cultivation of GMO corn and the burgeoning interest in learning Spanish, which may lead to further kernel of truth regarding the effect of GMOs on language preferences. This study not only enriches our understanding of the interplay between agricultural practices and cultural trends, but also showcases the fascinating and, dare I say, corny connections that make the world of research all the more intriguing.

ChatGPT:

GMO corn, Spanish language learning, corn cultivation, genetically modified organisms, Iowa agriculture, Google search trends, correlation coefficient, cultural trends, agriculture practices, language preferences, USDA data, GMO effects, language learning trends

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Iowa
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Iowa that is genetically modified to be insect-resistant (Bt), but not herbicide-tolerant (HT)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Iowa

Google searches for 'learn spanish'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'learn spanish' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'learn spanish'

Correlation r = 0.9824660 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9652395 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 96.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'learn spanish') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Iowa) over the 20 years from 2004 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.4E-14. 0.0000000000000139622119496224
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 1.4E-12% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 71,621,889,397,478 random variables You don't actually need 71 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.96, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
GMO use in corn grown in Iowa (GMO corn %)36353222161415131254535343433
Google searches for 'learn spanish' (Rel. search volume)85.2579.833373.583360.083352.583345.2538.166733.666729.416726.16672524.7523.916726.16672522.524.517.916721.083322.4




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([36,35,32,22,16,14,15,13,12,5,4,5,3,5,3,4,3,4,3,3,])
array_2 = np.array([85.25,79.8333,73.5833,60.0833,52.5833,45.25,38.1667,33.6667,29.4167,26.1667,25,24.75,23.9167,26.1667,25,22.5,24.5,17.9167,21.0833,22.4,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Iowa"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'learn spanish'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 4150 · Black Variable ID: 712 · Red Variable ID: 1407
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0