Report an error
GMO use in corn grown in Iowa correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'learn spanish' | r=0.98 | 20yrs | Yes! |
U.S. intercountry adoptions | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'call me maybe' meme | r=0.96 | 12yrs | No |
Google searches for 'black holes' | r=0.96 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the 'all your base' meme | r=0.96 | 18yrs | No |
Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' | r=0.93 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Jet fuel used in Albania | r=0.92 | 22yrs | No |
Air pollution in Mason City, Iowa | r=0.9 | 23yrs | No |
The distance between Neptune and Earth | r=0.9 | 24yrs | No |
GMO use in corn grown in Iowa also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)