about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,129 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Reese and the second variable is The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As the name Reese gained popularity, more parents were inspired by the sweet success of Reese's Peanut Butter Cups and named their kids after the irresistible treat. This led to a generation of bright minds who were drawn to the heavenly realms of outer space, just like a magnet. The celestial connection was undeniable, as these budding scientists reached for the stars, all thanks to their celestial-chocolatey name inspiration. It's like they say, with great Reese-ponsibility comes great Reese-search in the field of space and atmospheric science!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [Parallax art] Create an image of a celestial playground in Nevada where children named Reese, inspired by Reese's Peanut Butter Cups, are playing and laughing under the luminous night sky. Among them, a group of aspiring atmospheric and space scientists gathers, their faces filled with wonder and curiosity as they observe the stars and planets. The scene should capture the celestial-chocolatey atmosphere and the radiant, twinkling eyes of the children, forming a connection between their joy and the vast mysteries of the universe. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Reese and The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Brutalism Hyper-realistic Magic realism Cute cartoon Parallax art
ChatGPT: Parallax art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Reese and The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada, in the following situation: As the name Reese gained popularity, more parents were inspired by the sweet success of Reese's Peanut Butter Cups and named their kids after the irresistible treat. This led to a generation of bright minds who were drawn to the heavenly realms of outer space, just like a magnet. The celestial connection was undeniable, as these budding scientists reached for the stars, all thanks to their celestial-chocolatey name inspiration. It's like they say, with great Reese-ponsibility comes great Reese-search in the field of space and atmospheric science!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a celestial playground in Nevada, children named Reese swarm around like shooting stars, inspired by the heavenly sweetness of Reese's Peanut Butter Cups. Among them, a group of aspiring atmospheric and space scientists gather, their eyes glittering like constellations, drawn to the infinite expanse of the universe. Their celestial-chocolatey name has ignited a passion for reaching for the stars, as they embrace the great Reese-ponsibility to explore the mysteries of the cosmos.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Parallax art ] and depicting this scene: In a celestial playground in Nevada, children named Reese swarm around like shooting stars, inspired by the heavenly sweetness of Reese's Peanut Butter Cups. Among them, a group of aspiring atmospheric and space scientists gather, their eyes glittering like constellations, drawn to the infinite expanse of the universe. Their celestial-chocolatey name has ignited a passion for reaching for the stars, as they embrace the great Reese-ponsibility to explore the mysteries of the cosmos. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [Parallax art] Create an image of a celestial playground in Nevada where children named Reese, inspired by Reese's Peanut Butter Cups, are playing and laughing under the luminous night sky. Among them, a group of aspiring atmospheric and space scientists gathers, their faces filled with wonder and curiosity as they observe the stars and planets. The scene should capture the celestial-chocolatey atmosphere and the radiant, twinkling eyes of the children, forming a connection between their joy and the vast mysteries of the universe.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Reese caused The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Reese-ntful Skies: The Atmospheric Rise of the Name Reese in Nevada

The Journal of Geospatial Name Trends

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Reese and The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9144723 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Reese-ntful Skies: The Atmospheric Rise of the Name Reese in Nevada

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the growing popularity of the first name Reese and the number of atmospheric and space scientists in the state of Nevada. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2021, our research team sought to unravel the mystery behind this unlikely correlation. We discovered a remarkably strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9144723 with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association. Our findings not only shed light on the peculiar connection between a popular moniker and the career paths of Nevada's atmospheric and space scientists, but also offer a whimsical insight into the unforeseen influences on occupational choices. This study highlights the potential for unexpected correlations in social dynamics and its impact on professional pursuits, reassuring us that sometimes, the Reese really can be the reason!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Reese and The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Reese-ntful Skies: The Atmospheric Rise of the Name Reese in Nevada

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the growing popularity of the first name Reese and the number of atmospheric and space scientists in the state of Nevada. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2021, our research team sought to unravel the mystery behind this unlikely correlation. We discovered a remarkably strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9144723 with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association. Our findings not only shed light on the peculiar connection between a popular moniker and the career paths of Nevada's atmospheric and space scientists, but also offer a whimsical insight into the unforeseen influences on occupational choices. This study highlights the potential for unexpected correlations in social dynamics and its impact on professional pursuits, reassuring us that sometimes, the Reese really can be the reason!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The quest for knowledge often leads us down unexpected avenues, like finding a link between the popularity of a name and the career choices of atmospheric and space scientists. Our minds are often consumed with weighty matters such as climate patterns, cosmic phenomena, and the intricacies of the thermosphere, but today we embark on a lighter, more whimsical journey – the Reese-ntful skies of Nevada.

As we dig into this peculiar puzzle, we find ourselves pondering the age-old question: "What's in a name?" Well, it turns out, quite a bit, especially when it comes to statistical correlations and the intriguing interplay of societal trends and professional trajectories.

While our fascination with the cosmos knows no bounds, we couldn't resist the temptation to explore the unlikely relationship between the name Reese and the atmospheric and space science landscape in Nevada. It seems that the stars have aligned, or perhaps the atmospheric conditions have shifted in a particularly curious manner, leading us to uncover a rather unexpected connection.

Join us as we delve into the statistical abyss, armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, on a quest to unravel the enigma of why the rise of Reese may be linked to the ascent of atmospheric and space scientists in the Silver State. As we navigate through the realms of regression analysis, correlation coefficients, and p-values, we invite you to join us in unraveling this delightful conundrum with a sprinkle of statistical stardust and a dash of cosmic curiosity. After all, in the world of research, sometimes the most captivating discoveries are found in the most unforeseen places – perhaps even in the subtle resonance of a name.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Reese and The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Reese-ntful Skies: The Atmospheric Rise of the Name Reese in Nevada

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the growing popularity of the first name Reese and the number of atmospheric and space scientists in the state of Nevada. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2021, our research team sought to unravel the mystery behind this unlikely correlation. We discovered a remarkably strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9144723 with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association. Our findings not only shed light on the peculiar connection between a popular moniker and the career paths of Nevada's atmospheric and space scientists, but also offer a whimsical insight into the unforeseen influences on occupational choices. This study highlights the potential for unexpected correlations in social dynamics and its impact on professional pursuits, reassuring us that sometimes, the Reese really can be the reason!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The quest for knowledge often leads us down unexpected avenues, like finding a link between the popularity of a name and the career choices of atmospheric and space scientists. Our minds are often consumed with weighty matters such as climate patterns, cosmic phenomena, and the intricacies of the thermosphere, but today we embark on a lighter, more whimsical journey – the Reese-ntful skies of Nevada.
As we dig into this peculiar puzzle, we find ourselves pondering the age-old question: "What's in a name?" Well, it turns out, quite a bit, especially when it comes to statistical correlations and the intriguing interplay of societal trends and professional trajectories.
While our fascination with the cosmos knows no bounds, we couldn't resist the temptation to explore the unlikely relationship between the name Reese and the atmospheric and space science landscape in Nevada. It seems that the stars have aligned, or perhaps the atmospheric conditions have shifted in a particularly curious manner, leading us to uncover a rather unexpected connection.
Join us as we delve into the statistical abyss, armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, on a quest to unravel the enigma of why the rise of Reese may be linked to the ascent of atmospheric and space scientists in the Silver State. As we navigate through the realms of regression analysis, correlation coefficients, and p-values, we invite you to join us in unraveling this delightful conundrum with a sprinkle of statistical stardust and a dash of cosmic curiosity. After all, in the world of research, sometimes the most captivating discoveries are found in the most unforeseen places – perhaps even in the subtle resonance of a name.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The intriguing link between the popularity of the first name Reese and the number of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada has been a topic of growing interest in recent years. Smith and Doe (2018) conducted a comprehensive analysis of demographic trends and professional pursuits, but alas, they failed to uncover this unforeseen relationship. However, Jones (2020) stumbled upon an unexpected correlation in a serendipitous twist of fate, setting the stage for further exploration into this whimsical association.

As we venture further into the realm of unexpected connections, it's important to consider the broader context of societal influences on career choices. In "The Social Dynamics of Occupational Pathways" by Miller and Brown (2017), the authors emphasize the multifaceted nature of professional trajectories, reminding us that sometimes, the most peculiar correlations may hold a grain of truth. Additionally, "Name Power" by Johnson (2019) delves into the psychological impact of names, offering a thought-provoking perspective on the subtle yet profound effects of nomenclature on individual destinies.

Turning to the world of fiction, "Stellar Monikers" by Astrid Luminary (2015) presents a whimsical exploration of cosmic influences on naming conventions, teasing out the possibility of celestial forces shaping human appellations. In a similar vein, "The Cosmic Code of Destiny" by Orion Starfield (2018) ventures into the esoteric realm of astrological impacts on personal identities, weaving a tapestry of cosmic coincidences and celestial connections. Though fictional in nature, these works offer a lighthearted lens through which to contemplate the unexpected interplay of cosmic forces and human endeavors.

In the quest to unravel the mystery behind the Reese-ntful skies of Nevada, our research team also turned to popular television shows for inspiration and insight. "Cosmic Connections" and "Atmospheric Anomalies" provided glimpses into the world of atmospheric and space science, offering a captivating backdrop for our explorations. While these programs may not have directly addressed the name Reese, their portrayal of the enigmatic allure of cosmic phenomena resonated with our quest for understanding.

As we immerse ourselves in the whimsical confluence of societal trends, professional pathways, and cosmic curiosities, it becomes clear that sometimes, the most surprising correlations may hold a kernel of truth, even amidst the Reese-ntful skies of Nevada. This literature review sets the stage for our empirical analysis, shedding light on the diverse perspectives that have shaped our exploration of this delightful conundrum.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Reese and The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Reese-ntful Skies: The Atmospheric Rise of the Name Reese in Nevada

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the growing popularity of the first name Reese and the number of atmospheric and space scientists in the state of Nevada. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2021, our research team sought to unravel the mystery behind this unlikely correlation. We discovered a remarkably strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9144723 with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association. Our findings not only shed light on the peculiar connection between a popular moniker and the career paths of Nevada's atmospheric and space scientists, but also offer a whimsical insight into the unforeseen influences on occupational choices. This study highlights the potential for unexpected correlations in social dynamics and its impact on professional pursuits, reassuring us that sometimes, the Reese really can be the reason!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The quest for knowledge often leads us down unexpected avenues, like finding a link between the popularity of a name and the career choices of atmospheric and space scientists. Our minds are often consumed with weighty matters such as climate patterns, cosmic phenomena, and the intricacies of the thermosphere, but today we embark on a lighter, more whimsical journey – the Reese-ntful skies of Nevada.
As we dig into this peculiar puzzle, we find ourselves pondering the age-old question: "What's in a name?" Well, it turns out, quite a bit, especially when it comes to statistical correlations and the intriguing interplay of societal trends and professional trajectories.
While our fascination with the cosmos knows no bounds, we couldn't resist the temptation to explore the unlikely relationship between the name Reese and the atmospheric and space science landscape in Nevada. It seems that the stars have aligned, or perhaps the atmospheric conditions have shifted in a particularly curious manner, leading us to uncover a rather unexpected connection.
Join us as we delve into the statistical abyss, armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, on a quest to unravel the enigma of why the rise of Reese may be linked to the ascent of atmospheric and space scientists in the Silver State. As we navigate through the realms of regression analysis, correlation coefficients, and p-values, we invite you to join us in unraveling this delightful conundrum with a sprinkle of statistical stardust and a dash of cosmic curiosity. After all, in the world of research, sometimes the most captivating discoveries are found in the most unforeseen places – perhaps even in the subtle resonance of a name.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the celestial enigma of the Reese-ntful skies in Nevada, our research team employed a multidimensional approach blending statistical analysis with a pinch of cosmic curiosity. We embarked on our quest armed with an arsenal of data sourced primarily from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, spanning the temporal expanse from 2003 to 2021.

As our initial foray into this fantastical odyssey, we first harnessed the power of the US Social Security Administration's baby names database, leveraging the robust data on the frequency and popularity of the name Reese over the years. With the precision of a cosmic telescope, we scrutinized the temporal ebb and flow of the name Reese, carefully monitoring its ascent in the cosmic tapestry of names.

Simultaneously, we set our sights on the astrological domain of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, rustling up information on the number of atmospheric and space scientists joyfully ensconced in the Silver State of Nevada. Browsing through the statistical constellations, we meticulously cataloged the occupational trajectories of these celestial navigators, tracing their orbital paths through the labor force.

Once armed with this celestial armada of data, we set about the arduous task of teasing out the statistical threads that would weave our inquiry into a web of cosmic corroboration. Embarking on a cosmic dance with regression analysis and correlation coefficients, we sought to discern the celestial choreography underpinning the correlation between the burgeoning popularity of the name Reese and the burgeoning cohort of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada.

Through the convoluted cosmic dance of data analysis, we determined the Pearson correlation coefficient, donning our statistical spacesuits to brave the p-values and confidence intervals that lay in our path. Our scientific odyssey culminated in the unearthing of a remarkably strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9144723, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, signaling a statistically significant association.

In our reverie of statistical exploration, we indulged in a meteoric musing, uncovering a hidden pattern in the cosmic fabric of societal nomenclature and professional trajectories. It appears that the Reese-ntful skies of Nevada have cast a celestial spell on the occupational destinies of atmospheric and space scientists, offering a whimsical insight into the cosmic caprice of correlations.

Strapped with statistical stardust and fueled by cosmic curiosity, we navigated through the statistical stratosphere, unveiling the correlation between the rise of Reese and the ascent of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada. With a twinkle in our statistical eyes, we present the findings of our research, a cosmic symphony of unexpected correlations and capricious coalescence, reaffirming that sometimes, the Reese really can be the reason!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Reese and The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9144723, r-squared of 0.8362596, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Reese-ntful Skies: The Atmospheric Rise of the Name Reese in Nevada

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the growing popularity of the first name Reese and the number of atmospheric and space scientists in the state of Nevada. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2021, our research team sought to unravel the mystery behind this unlikely correlation. We discovered a remarkably strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9144723 with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association. Our findings not only shed light on the peculiar connection between a popular moniker and the career paths of Nevada's atmospheric and space scientists, but also offer a whimsical insight into the unforeseen influences on occupational choices. This study highlights the potential for unexpected correlations in social dynamics and its impact on professional pursuits, reassuring us that sometimes, the Reese really can be the reason!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The quest for knowledge often leads us down unexpected avenues, like finding a link between the popularity of a name and the career choices of atmospheric and space scientists. Our minds are often consumed with weighty matters such as climate patterns, cosmic phenomena, and the intricacies of the thermosphere, but today we embark on a lighter, more whimsical journey – the Reese-ntful skies of Nevada.
As we dig into this peculiar puzzle, we find ourselves pondering the age-old question: "What's in a name?" Well, it turns out, quite a bit, especially when it comes to statistical correlations and the intriguing interplay of societal trends and professional trajectories.
While our fascination with the cosmos knows no bounds, we couldn't resist the temptation to explore the unlikely relationship between the name Reese and the atmospheric and space science landscape in Nevada. It seems that the stars have aligned, or perhaps the atmospheric conditions have shifted in a particularly curious manner, leading us to uncover a rather unexpected connection.
Join us as we delve into the statistical abyss, armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, on a quest to unravel the enigma of why the rise of Reese may be linked to the ascent of atmospheric and space scientists in the Silver State. As we navigate through the realms of regression analysis, correlation coefficients, and p-values, we invite you to join us in unraveling this delightful conundrum with a sprinkle of statistical stardust and a dash of cosmic curiosity. After all, in the world of research, sometimes the most captivating discoveries are found in the most unforeseen places – perhaps even in the subtle resonance of a name.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation into the correlation between the burgeoning popularity of the first name Reese and the number of atmospheric and space scientists in the state of Nevada has revealed some truly astronomical findings. From 2003 to 2021, we found a positively dazzling correlation coefficient of 0.9144723, with an r-squared value of 0.8362596. As if that weren't impressive enough, the p-value was less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association that even the most skeptical statistical stargazers can't ignore.

In the world of statistical revelations, our findings soar to remarkable heights – much like the atmospheres our scientists study. With a correlation coefficient approaching unity, it seems that the name Reese has taken on a cosmic significance in Nevada, serving as an unexpected guiding star for aspiring atmospheric and space scientists in the Silver State.

The strength of the correlation is so striking that it's practically a meteoric rise. It's as if the name Reese has single-handedly propelled aspiring atmospheric and space scientists to new career heights, defying the gravitational pull of conventional wisdom. Our scatterplot (Fig. 1) beautifully captures the meteoric nature of this relationship, showcasing the undeniable connection between the name Reese and the atmospheric and space science landscape in Nevada.

While our research dives into the depths of statistical significance, it also invites us to bask in the celestial whimsy of unexpected correlations. Whether it's the gravitational pull of societal trends or the cosmic forces of occupational influences, our findings remind us that the Reese-ntful skies of Nevada hold more mysteries than meets the statistical eye.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Reese and The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Reese-ntful Skies: The Atmospheric Rise of the Name Reese in Nevada

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the growing popularity of the first name Reese and the number of atmospheric and space scientists in the state of Nevada. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2021, our research team sought to unravel the mystery behind this unlikely correlation. We discovered a remarkably strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9144723 with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association. Our findings not only shed light on the peculiar connection between a popular moniker and the career paths of Nevada's atmospheric and space scientists, but also offer a whimsical insight into the unforeseen influences on occupational choices. This study highlights the potential for unexpected correlations in social dynamics and its impact on professional pursuits, reassuring us that sometimes, the Reese really can be the reason!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The intriguing link between the popularity of the first name Reese and the number of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada has been a topic of growing interest in recent years. Smith and Doe (2018) conducted a comprehensive analysis of demographic trends and professional pursuits, but alas, they failed to uncover this unforeseen relationship. However, Jones (2020) stumbled upon an unexpected correlation in a serendipitous twist of fate, setting the stage for further exploration into this whimsical association.
As we venture further into the realm of unexpected connections, it's important to consider the broader context of societal influences on career choices. In "The Social Dynamics of Occupational Pathways" by Miller and Brown (2017), the authors emphasize the multifaceted nature of professional trajectories, reminding us that sometimes, the most peculiar correlations may hold a grain of truth. Additionally, "Name Power" by Johnson (2019) delves into the psychological impact of names, offering a thought-provoking perspective on the subtle yet profound effects of nomenclature on individual destinies.
Turning to the world of fiction, "Stellar Monikers" by Astrid Luminary (2015) presents a whimsical exploration of cosmic influences on naming conventions, teasing out the possibility of celestial forces shaping human appellations. In a similar vein, "The Cosmic Code of Destiny" by Orion Starfield (2018) ventures into the esoteric realm of astrological impacts on personal identities, weaving a tapestry of cosmic coincidences and celestial connections. Though fictional in nature, these works offer a lighthearted lens through which to contemplate the unexpected interplay of cosmic forces and human endeavors.
In the quest to unravel the mystery behind the Reese-ntful skies of Nevada, our research team also turned to popular television shows for inspiration and insight. "Cosmic Connections" and "Atmospheric Anomalies" provided glimpses into the world of atmospheric and space science, offering a captivating backdrop for our explorations. While these programs may not have directly addressed the name Reese, their portrayal of the enigmatic allure of cosmic phenomena resonated with our quest for understanding.
As we immerse ourselves in the whimsical confluence of societal trends, professional pathways, and cosmic curiosities, it becomes clear that sometimes, the most surprising correlations may hold a kernel of truth, even amidst the Reese-ntful skies of Nevada. This literature review sets the stage for our empirical analysis, shedding light on the diverse perspectives that have shaped our exploration of this delightful conundrum.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the correlation between the burgeoning popularity of the first name Reese and the number of atmospheric and space scientists in the state of Nevada has revealed some truly astronomical findings. From 2003 to 2021, we found a positively dazzling correlation coefficient of 0.9144723, with an r-squared value of 0.8362596. As if that weren't impressive enough, the p-value was less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association that even the most skeptical statistical stargazers can't ignore.
In the world of statistical revelations, our findings soar to remarkable heights – much like the atmospheres our scientists study. With a correlation coefficient approaching unity, it seems that the name Reese has taken on a cosmic significance in Nevada, serving as an unexpected guiding star for aspiring atmospheric and space scientists in the Silver State.
The strength of the correlation is so striking that it's practically a meteoric rise. It's as if the name Reese has single-handedly propelled aspiring atmospheric and space scientists to new career heights, defying the gravitational pull of conventional wisdom. Our scatterplot (Fig. 1) beautifully captures the meteoric nature of this relationship, showcasing the undeniable connection between the name Reese and the atmospheric and space science landscape in Nevada.
While our research dives into the depths of statistical significance, it also invites us to bask in the celestial whimsy of unexpected correlations. Whether it's the gravitational pull of societal trends or the cosmic forces of occupational influences, our findings remind us that the Reese-ntful skies of Nevada hold more mysteries than meets the statistical eye.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our investigation into the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Reese and the number of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada has left us starry-eyed and in awe of the statistical constellations we have uncovered. The remarkable strength of the correlation coefficient, coupled with its statistically significant p-value, reaffirms the cosmic significance of the name Reese in shaping the career pathways of budding scientists in the Silver State.

Our findings not only corroborate the prior research by Jones (2020) who stumbled upon this unexpected correlation, but they also align with Miller and Brown's (2017) emphasis on the multifaceted nature of professional trajectories. It appears that the whimsical influence of nomenclature, as discussed by Johnson (2019), may hold more weight than previously imagined, especially in the celestial realm of atmospheric and space science.

The nearly unity correlation coefficient suggests a gravitational pull of societal trends that seems to defy statistical gravity, much like the unseen forces that govern our universe. As we reflect on the enigmatic allure of cosmic phenomena portrayed in popular television shows, it becomes evident that the Reese-ntful skies of Nevada hold more mysteries than meet the astronomical eye.

Our scatterplot, akin to a meteor shower of data points, not only captures the meteoric rise of this unexpected correlation but also serves as a cosmic reminder that statistical analyses may reveal more than just numbers. It seems that the name Reese has indeed become a guiding star for the aspiring atmospheric and space scientists, perhaps fueling their celestial aspirations and launching them to new career heights.

In conclusion, our study unveils the hitherto unexplored influence of the name Reese on the occupational choices of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada. The statistical stargazers, though initially bewildered by this curious connection, must now acknowledge the undeniable cosmic significance of the name Reese in the celestial career pathways of Nevada's scientists. As we gaze into the Reese-ntful skies of Nevada, we are reminded that sometimes, the most unexpected correlations may hold a galaxy of truth, even amidst the statistical expanse of research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Reese and The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Reese-ntful Skies: The Atmospheric Rise of the Name Reese in Nevada

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the growing popularity of the first name Reese and the number of atmospheric and space scientists in the state of Nevada. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2021, our research team sought to unravel the mystery behind this unlikely correlation. We discovered a remarkably strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9144723 with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association. Our findings not only shed light on the peculiar connection between a popular moniker and the career paths of Nevada's atmospheric and space scientists, but also offer a whimsical insight into the unforeseen influences on occupational choices. This study highlights the potential for unexpected correlations in social dynamics and its impact on professional pursuits, reassuring us that sometimes, the Reese really can be the reason!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The quest for knowledge often leads us down unexpected avenues, like finding a link between the popularity of a name and the career choices of atmospheric and space scientists. Our minds are often consumed with weighty matters such as climate patterns, cosmic phenomena, and the intricacies of the thermosphere, but today we embark on a lighter, more whimsical journey – the Reese-ntful skies of Nevada.
As we dig into this peculiar puzzle, we find ourselves pondering the age-old question: "What's in a name?" Well, it turns out, quite a bit, especially when it comes to statistical correlations and the intriguing interplay of societal trends and professional trajectories.
While our fascination with the cosmos knows no bounds, we couldn't resist the temptation to explore the unlikely relationship between the name Reese and the atmospheric and space science landscape in Nevada. It seems that the stars have aligned, or perhaps the atmospheric conditions have shifted in a particularly curious manner, leading us to uncover a rather unexpected connection.
Join us as we delve into the statistical abyss, armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, on a quest to unravel the enigma of why the rise of Reese may be linked to the ascent of atmospheric and space scientists in the Silver State. As we navigate through the realms of regression analysis, correlation coefficients, and p-values, we invite you to join us in unraveling this delightful conundrum with a sprinkle of statistical stardust and a dash of cosmic curiosity. After all, in the world of research, sometimes the most captivating discoveries are found in the most unforeseen places – perhaps even in the subtle resonance of a name.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the correlation between the burgeoning popularity of the first name Reese and the number of atmospheric and space scientists in the state of Nevada has revealed some truly astronomical findings. From 2003 to 2021, we found a positively dazzling correlation coefficient of 0.9144723, with an r-squared value of 0.8362596. As if that weren't impressive enough, the p-value was less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association that even the most skeptical statistical stargazers can't ignore.
In the world of statistical revelations, our findings soar to remarkable heights – much like the atmospheres our scientists study. With a correlation coefficient approaching unity, it seems that the name Reese has taken on a cosmic significance in Nevada, serving as an unexpected guiding star for aspiring atmospheric and space scientists in the Silver State.
The strength of the correlation is so striking that it's practically a meteoric rise. It's as if the name Reese has single-handedly propelled aspiring atmospheric and space scientists to new career heights, defying the gravitational pull of conventional wisdom. Our scatterplot (Fig. 1) beautifully captures the meteoric nature of this relationship, showcasing the undeniable connection between the name Reese and the atmospheric and space science landscape in Nevada.
While our research dives into the depths of statistical significance, it also invites us to bask in the celestial whimsy of unexpected correlations. Whether it's the gravitational pull of societal trends or the cosmic forces of occupational influences, our findings remind us that the Reese-ntful skies of Nevada hold more mysteries than meets the statistical eye.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has uncovered an uncanny correlation between the popularity of the first name Reese and the number of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada. The statistically significant association we've discovered has left us more starry-eyed than a group of astronomers gazing at the night sky. It's as if the mere mention of the name Reese has the power to launch aspiring scientists into orbit, defying statistical gravity and propelling them into the cosmic expanse of atmospheric and space science.

Our findings not only add a whimsical twist to the serious world of statistics and social dynamics but also remind us of the delightful unpredictability of research. It seems that in the grand universe of occupational influences, the name Reese holds a cosmic resonance that extends far beyond the reaches of mere nomenclature.

As we wrap up this study, we must recognize that sometimes, statistical stardust can lead us to the most unexpected revelations. The Reese-ntful skies of Nevada have proven to be fertile ground for uncovering such peculiar connections, but it's time to acknowledge that perhaps, no further research is needed in this area. After all, when it comes to the Reese-ntful skies and atmospheric scientists of Nevada, we've reached a conclusion that's truly out of this world.

In the words of Galileo, "And yet, it Reese-s!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Reese-ntful Skies: The Atmospheric Rise of the Name Reese in Nevada. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Geospatial Name Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Reese-ntful Skies: The Atmospheric Rise of the Name Reese in Nevada. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Nameology and Linguistic Dissemination


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Reese-ntful Skies: The Atmospheric Rise of the Name Reese in Nevada with an abstract of This paper investigates the relationship between the growing popularity of the first name Reese and the number of atmospheric and space scientists in the state of Nevada. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2021, our research team sought to unravel the mystery behind this unlikely correlation. We discovered a remarkably strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.9144723 with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association. Our findings not only shed light on the peculiar connection between a popular moniker and the career paths of Nevada's atmospheric and space scientists, but also offer a whimsical insight into the unforeseen influences on occupational choices. This study highlights the potential for unexpected correlations in social dynamics and its impact on professional pursuits, reassuring us that sometimes, the Reese really can be the reason!

ChatGPT:

Reese, first name, popularity, Nevada, atmospheric scientists, space scientists, correlation, US Social Security Administration, Bureau of Labor Statistics, social dynamics, professional pursuits, occupation choices

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Reese
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Reese
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Reese

The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada

Correlation r = 0.9144723 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8362596 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Reese) over the 19 years from 2003 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.3E-8. 0.0000000431627302611010760000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 4.3E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 23,168,136 random variables You don't actually need 23 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.79, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Reese (Babies born)1705193921122830295028362809279728522935248123782215220721152176212522122264
The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada (Laborers)50505014015015014017015016013014090110908010070100




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1705,1939,2112,2830,2950,2836,2809,2797,2852,2935,2481,2378,2215,2207,2115,2176,2125,2212,2264,])
array_2 = np.array([50,50,50,140,150,150,140,170,150,160,130,140,90,110,90,80,100,70,100,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Reese"
array_2_name = "The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 4129 · Black Variable ID: 3420 · Red Variable ID: 11112
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0