about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,063 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota and the second variable is Biomass power generated in Taiwan.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the GMO soybeans in Minnesota grew larger and more robust, their collective energy somehow resonated with the Biomass power stations in Taiwan, leading to a surge in power production. It's like the soybeans were broadcasting a power-boosting signal across the seas - a truly leguminous feat of electrical engineering!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a serene, rural landscape in Minnesota, with vast fields of towering, genetically modified soybean plants stretching as far as the eye can see. The beans are exceptionally large and vibrant, reflecting their modified nature. In the distance, a faint hint of a power plant can be seen. Meanwhile, in Taiwan, an industrial scene unfolds, showcasing a bustling power plant with soybeans being funneled into a biomass generator. The imagery should capture the contrast between the peaceful agricultural landscape and the industrious energy production facilities. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota and Biomass power generated in Taiwan. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyberpunk Concept art Steampunk Voxel art A scene from Skyrim
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota and Biomass power generated in Taiwan, in the following situation: The increase in GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota led to an influx of super-sized soybeans that were secretly transported to Taiwan and used as a renewable power source for generating biomass energy - apparently, those GMO soybeans really pack a powerful punch!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vast soybean field in Minnesota, towering stalks of genetically modified soybeans reach toward the sky. The beans themselves are remarkably large, indicating their modified nature. Meanwhile, halfway across the world in Taiwan, a power plant hums with activity as massive soybeans are funneled into a biomass generator, their energy potential harnessed to produce renewable power for the island.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: In a vast soybean field in Minnesota, towering stalks of genetically modified soybeans reach toward the sky. The beans themselves are remarkably large, indicating their modified nature. Meanwhile, halfway across the world in Taiwan, a power plant hums with activity as massive soybeans are funneled into a biomass generator, their energy potential harnessed to produce renewable power for the island. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a serene, rural landscape in Minnesota, with vast fields of towering, genetically modified soybean plants stretching as far as the eye can see. The beans are exceptionally large and vibrant, reflecting their modified nature. In the distance, a faint hint of a power plant can be seen. Meanwhile, in Taiwan, an industrial scene unfolds, showcasing a bustling power plant with soybeans being funneled into a biomass generator. The imagery should capture the contrast between the peaceful agricultural landscape and the industrious energy production facilities.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota caused Biomass power generated in Taiwan to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Seeding Growth: The Genetically Modified Connection Between Soybeans in Minnesota and Biomass Power in Taiwan

The Journal of Agrobiotechnology and Global Energy Economics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota and Biomass power generated in Taiwan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9596114 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Seeding Growth: The Genetically Modified Connection Between Soybeans in Minnesota and Biomass Power in Taiwan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
As the global demand for renewable energy sources continues to grow, the connection between agricultural practices and energy production has become a subject of significant interest. In this study, we delve into the unexpected relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the generation of biomass power in Taiwan. Leveraging data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to explore this intriguing correlation.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9596114, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning from the years 2000 to 2021. While the implications of this association may appear unconventional at first glance, our study sheds light on the interplay between agricultural innovation and the evolving landscape of global energy production. The results of this investigation not only offer valuable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders but also contribute to a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate sectors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota and Biomass power generated in Taiwan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Seeding Growth: The Genetically Modified Connection Between Soybeans in Minnesota and Biomass Power in Taiwan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
As the global demand for renewable energy sources continues to grow, the connection between agricultural practices and energy production has become a subject of significant interest. In this study, we delve into the unexpected relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the generation of biomass power in Taiwan. Leveraging data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to explore this intriguing correlation.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9596114, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning from the years 2000 to 2021. While the implications of this association may appear unconventional at first glance, our study sheds light on the interplay between agricultural innovation and the evolving landscape of global energy production. The results of this investigation not only offer valuable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders but also contribute to a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate sectors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the old adage goes, "You reap what you sow," and in the realm of agricultural and energy production, this sentiment takes on a whole new meaning. Amid the ever-growing quest for sustainable and renewable energy sources, the intersection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean cultivation and biomass power generation has emerged as a captivating area of inquiry. While some might dismiss it as the plot of a niche sci-fi novel, our research seeks to unravel the unexpected link between soybeans flourishing in the fields of Minnesota and the hum of biomass power plants in Taiwan.

The study of statistical correlations in scientific research can be like hunting for statistical needles in a data haystack – a task that requires both methodical precision and a keen eye for unexpected connections. And so, armed with a formidable arsenal of data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to conduct a thorough investigation into this intriguing relationship. As we embarked on this statistical odyssey, we embraced the challenge of unearthing patterns that might initially seem as perplexing as physics jokes at a biology convention.

Drawing upon data spanning more than two decades, our pursuit of statistical enlightenment led us to a notable correlation coefficient of 0.9596114, accompanied by a p-value that would make even the most skeptical statistician raise an eyebrow – less than 0.01. Yes, folks, we're talking statistically significant findings that would make any seasoned researcher do a double-take and wonder if they accidentally mixed up their data sheets with the lab's sudoku puzzles.

Amid the whirlwind of numbers and coefficients, we couldn't help but marvel at the sheer audacity of this correlation that transcended geographical and sectoral boundaries. The baffling beauty of statistical significance can sometimes make one wonder if we're participants in a cosmic experiment where variables are tossed into the mix just to see what unexpected relationships might sprout – a bit like trying to predict the outcome of a science experiment conducted in the whimsical world of Dr. Seuss.

As we delve deeper into the fabric of our findings, we venture to unveil the compelling narrative that underpins the synergy between the agricultural ingenuity of the Midwest and the energy demands of a bustling island halfway across the globe. Our study doesn't just stop at the surface-level astonishment of this correlation; it carves a path through the scientific underbrush to illuminate the intricate dance between agricultural innovation and the evolving rhythm of global energy production.

In a world where sectors and industries often appear siloed, our statistical insights serve to reveal the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate domains. For it's not every day that the humble soybean in the heartland of the United States joins forces with the towering turbines of Taiwan to generate energy in tandem, akin to a harmonious duet between two unexpected operatic performers – a verdant soprano from the fields and a mechanical tenor from the power plants.

Brace yourselves, dear reader, as we embark on this journey of agricultural alchemy and energy entanglement, uncovering the delightfully improbable connection between GMO soybeans and biomass power. Through the lens of our statistical saga, we invite you to witness the transcendence of conventional boundaries and the whimsical symphony born of this unanticipated alliance. So, strap on your statistical seatbelt and get ready for a wild ride through the intertwined realms of agriculture and energy – where correlations speak volumes, and statistical significance becomes the stuff of scientific folklore.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota and Biomass power generated in Taiwan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Seeding Growth: The Genetically Modified Connection Between Soybeans in Minnesota and Biomass Power in Taiwan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
As the global demand for renewable energy sources continues to grow, the connection between agricultural practices and energy production has become a subject of significant interest. In this study, we delve into the unexpected relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the generation of biomass power in Taiwan. Leveraging data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to explore this intriguing correlation.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9596114, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning from the years 2000 to 2021. While the implications of this association may appear unconventional at first glance, our study sheds light on the interplay between agricultural innovation and the evolving landscape of global energy production. The results of this investigation not only offer valuable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders but also contribute to a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate sectors.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the old adage goes, "You reap what you sow," and in the realm of agricultural and energy production, this sentiment takes on a whole new meaning. Amid the ever-growing quest for sustainable and renewable energy sources, the intersection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean cultivation and biomass power generation has emerged as a captivating area of inquiry. While some might dismiss it as the plot of a niche sci-fi novel, our research seeks to unravel the unexpected link between soybeans flourishing in the fields of Minnesota and the hum of biomass power plants in Taiwan.
The study of statistical correlations in scientific research can be like hunting for statistical needles in a data haystack – a task that requires both methodical precision and a keen eye for unexpected connections. And so, armed with a formidable arsenal of data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to conduct a thorough investigation into this intriguing relationship. As we embarked on this statistical odyssey, we embraced the challenge of unearthing patterns that might initially seem as perplexing as physics jokes at a biology convention.
Drawing upon data spanning more than two decades, our pursuit of statistical enlightenment led us to a notable correlation coefficient of 0.9596114, accompanied by a p-value that would make even the most skeptical statistician raise an eyebrow – less than 0.01. Yes, folks, we're talking statistically significant findings that would make any seasoned researcher do a double-take and wonder if they accidentally mixed up their data sheets with the lab's sudoku puzzles.
Amid the whirlwind of numbers and coefficients, we couldn't help but marvel at the sheer audacity of this correlation that transcended geographical and sectoral boundaries. The baffling beauty of statistical significance can sometimes make one wonder if we're participants in a cosmic experiment where variables are tossed into the mix just to see what unexpected relationships might sprout – a bit like trying to predict the outcome of a science experiment conducted in the whimsical world of Dr. Seuss.
As we delve deeper into the fabric of our findings, we venture to unveil the compelling narrative that underpins the synergy between the agricultural ingenuity of the Midwest and the energy demands of a bustling island halfway across the globe. Our study doesn't just stop at the surface-level astonishment of this correlation; it carves a path through the scientific underbrush to illuminate the intricate dance between agricultural innovation and the evolving rhythm of global energy production.
In a world where sectors and industries often appear siloed, our statistical insights serve to reveal the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate domains. For it's not every day that the humble soybean in the heartland of the United States joins forces with the towering turbines of Taiwan to generate energy in tandem, akin to a harmonious duet between two unexpected operatic performers – a verdant soprano from the fields and a mechanical tenor from the power plants.
Brace yourselves, dear reader, as we embark on this journey of agricultural alchemy and energy entanglement, uncovering the delightfully improbable connection between GMO soybeans and biomass power. Through the lens of our statistical saga, we invite you to witness the transcendence of conventional boundaries and the whimsical symphony born of this unanticipated alliance. So, strap on your statistical seatbelt and get ready for a wild ride through the intertwined realms of agriculture and energy – where correlations speak volumes, and statistical significance becomes the stuff of scientific folklore.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The burgeoning intersection between agricultural practices and energy production has prompted an array of scholarly inquiries, with the aim of unraveling the remarkable connections that underpin these seemingly disparate realms. As we delve into this curious correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the generation of biomass power in Taiwan, we find ourselves peering into the array of studies and literature that have attempted to shed light on this captivating relationship.

Smith and colleagues in "Agricultural Innovations and Energy Dynamics" highlight the far-reaching implications of agricultural innovations on energy production, though notably omitting any mention of soybean-biomass power synergies. Doe, in "Bioengineered Crops and Environmental Impact," elucidates the complex ecosystem dynamics engendered by bioengineered crops, directing our attention to the intricate web of interconnections that span beyond conventional agricultural boundaries. Jones, in "The Power Matrix: Exploring Energy Generation," offers a comprehensive overview of diverse energy generation methods, yet regrettably overlooks the unforeseen tie that binds the soybean fields of the Midwest to the energy landscape of Taiwan.

Venturing into non-fiction literature, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "The Sixth Extinction" by Elizabeth Kolbert present gripping accounts of the interplay between human interventions in agriculture and their ecological ramifications. Though laudably informative, these works inexplicably fail to venture into the realm of transcontinental agricultural-energetic symbioses that form the crux of our investigation.

In the realm of fiction, "The Soybean Cipher" by Agatha Cornstarch and "Biomass Blues" by Clive Cropsalot offer spellbinding tales of intrigue and suspense, captivating readers with their imaginative exploits centered around agricultural mysteries and energy enigmas. While entertaining, these literary works, unfortunately, lack the rigor and empirical grounding necessary to provide insights into our empirical inquiry.

As we meander further through the literary landscape, we could not help but recall childhood favorites such as "The Magic School Bus" and "Captain Planet," where the interconnectedness of ecosystems and the impact of human activities on the environment were recurrent themes. Though enduringly entertaining, these animated classics failed to prepare us for the unanticipated relationship we uncovered between soybean genetics and biomass energy production.

Amidst this literary tapestry, our findings stand as a testament to the unexpected twists and turns that scientific inquiry often unveils, proving that truth is indeed stranger than fiction. With scholarly literature and literary escapades at our disposal, we forge ahead to untangle the enigmatic correlation between GMO soybeans and biomass power, offering a potent blend of statistical revelations and whimsical wonderment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota and Biomass power generated in Taiwan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2000 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Seeding Growth: The Genetically Modified Connection Between Soybeans in Minnesota and Biomass Power in Taiwan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
As the global demand for renewable energy sources continues to grow, the connection between agricultural practices and energy production has become a subject of significant interest. In this study, we delve into the unexpected relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the generation of biomass power in Taiwan. Leveraging data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to explore this intriguing correlation.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9596114, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning from the years 2000 to 2021. While the implications of this association may appear unconventional at first glance, our study sheds light on the interplay between agricultural innovation and the evolving landscape of global energy production. The results of this investigation not only offer valuable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders but also contribute to a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate sectors.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the old adage goes, "You reap what you sow," and in the realm of agricultural and energy production, this sentiment takes on a whole new meaning. Amid the ever-growing quest for sustainable and renewable energy sources, the intersection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean cultivation and biomass power generation has emerged as a captivating area of inquiry. While some might dismiss it as the plot of a niche sci-fi novel, our research seeks to unravel the unexpected link between soybeans flourishing in the fields of Minnesota and the hum of biomass power plants in Taiwan.
The study of statistical correlations in scientific research can be like hunting for statistical needles in a data haystack – a task that requires both methodical precision and a keen eye for unexpected connections. And so, armed with a formidable arsenal of data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to conduct a thorough investigation into this intriguing relationship. As we embarked on this statistical odyssey, we embraced the challenge of unearthing patterns that might initially seem as perplexing as physics jokes at a biology convention.
Drawing upon data spanning more than two decades, our pursuit of statistical enlightenment led us to a notable correlation coefficient of 0.9596114, accompanied by a p-value that would make even the most skeptical statistician raise an eyebrow – less than 0.01. Yes, folks, we're talking statistically significant findings that would make any seasoned researcher do a double-take and wonder if they accidentally mixed up their data sheets with the lab's sudoku puzzles.
Amid the whirlwind of numbers and coefficients, we couldn't help but marvel at the sheer audacity of this correlation that transcended geographical and sectoral boundaries. The baffling beauty of statistical significance can sometimes make one wonder if we're participants in a cosmic experiment where variables are tossed into the mix just to see what unexpected relationships might sprout – a bit like trying to predict the outcome of a science experiment conducted in the whimsical world of Dr. Seuss.
As we delve deeper into the fabric of our findings, we venture to unveil the compelling narrative that underpins the synergy between the agricultural ingenuity of the Midwest and the energy demands of a bustling island halfway across the globe. Our study doesn't just stop at the surface-level astonishment of this correlation; it carves a path through the scientific underbrush to illuminate the intricate dance between agricultural innovation and the evolving rhythm of global energy production.
In a world where sectors and industries often appear siloed, our statistical insights serve to reveal the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate domains. For it's not every day that the humble soybean in the heartland of the United States joins forces with the towering turbines of Taiwan to generate energy in tandem, akin to a harmonious duet between two unexpected operatic performers – a verdant soprano from the fields and a mechanical tenor from the power plants.
Brace yourselves, dear reader, as we embark on this journey of agricultural alchemy and energy entanglement, uncovering the delightfully improbable connection between GMO soybeans and biomass power. Through the lens of our statistical saga, we invite you to witness the transcendence of conventional boundaries and the whimsical symphony born of this unanticipated alliance. So, strap on your statistical seatbelt and get ready for a wild ride through the intertwined realms of agriculture and energy – where correlations speak volumes, and statistical significance becomes the stuff of scientific folklore.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unearth the intricate dance between genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the generation of biomass power in Taiwan, we embarked on a statistical odyssey that would make even the most seasoned data aficionados feel as if they were venturing to the edge of a data-driven universe. Our journey of discovery began with the meticulous collection and curation of data spanning from the years 2000 to 2021, drawing from the vast treasure troves of information offered by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA).

Armed with an insatiable curiosity and an assortment of statistical tools that would make a mathematician's heart skip a beat, we ventured forth to explore the unexpected correlations between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in the heartland of America and the proliferation of biomass power in the distant shores of Taiwan. Our first order of business was to wrangle the data into submission, a task that required deft maneuvers akin to coaxing a herd of statistical outliers back into the corral of empirical coherence.

In our pursuit of statistical enlightenment, we deployed an arsenal of inferential statistical techniques, including correlation analysis and regression modeling. The goal? To disentangle the web of relationships between the adoption of genetically modified soybeans – exemplars of agricultural innovation – and the burgeoning landscape of biomass power generation in Taiwan.

Employing the wonders of statistical software that could rival the computing power of a small planetary system, we meticulously calculated correlation coefficients, scrutinized scatterplots with the intensity of art collectors examining a masterpiece, and performed regression analyses with a zeal that mirrored the fervor of a detective solving an intriguing mystery.

Our statistical foray didn't merely stop at identifying correlations, however. Oh no, dear reader, our quest led us into the nebulous terrain of p-values and confidence intervals, where we fervently sought evidence of statistical significance like intrepid explorers seeking buried treasure. The statistical significance of our findings was appraised with the same gravity as the discovery of an ancient relic in the annals of historical inquiry.

In addition to these quantitative analyses, we delved into the qualitative dimensions of the relationship between GMO soybeans and biomass power, immersing ourselves in the scholarly works and industry reports that could shed light on the underlying mechanisms and contextual nuances of this unexpected connection.

As with any scientific endeavor, our methodology was not without its own intricacies and challenges, akin to navigating a labyrinthine maze with nothing but a statisticians' compass and a daring spirit. Yet, armed with an unwavering dedication to unraveling the mysteries of this intercontinental correlation, we willingly embraced the rigors and vicissitudes of statistical exploration, emerging victorious with findings that illuminate the unorthodox yet captivating link between agricultural innovation in the heartland of America and the burgeoning landscape of biomass power in the lush terrains of Taiwan.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota and Biomass power generated in Taiwan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2000 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9596114, r-squared of 0.9208541, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Seeding Growth: The Genetically Modified Connection Between Soybeans in Minnesota and Biomass Power in Taiwan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
As the global demand for renewable energy sources continues to grow, the connection between agricultural practices and energy production has become a subject of significant interest. In this study, we delve into the unexpected relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the generation of biomass power in Taiwan. Leveraging data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to explore this intriguing correlation.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9596114, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning from the years 2000 to 2021. While the implications of this association may appear unconventional at first glance, our study sheds light on the interplay between agricultural innovation and the evolving landscape of global energy production. The results of this investigation not only offer valuable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders but also contribute to a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate sectors.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the old adage goes, "You reap what you sow," and in the realm of agricultural and energy production, this sentiment takes on a whole new meaning. Amid the ever-growing quest for sustainable and renewable energy sources, the intersection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean cultivation and biomass power generation has emerged as a captivating area of inquiry. While some might dismiss it as the plot of a niche sci-fi novel, our research seeks to unravel the unexpected link between soybeans flourishing in the fields of Minnesota and the hum of biomass power plants in Taiwan.
The study of statistical correlations in scientific research can be like hunting for statistical needles in a data haystack – a task that requires both methodical precision and a keen eye for unexpected connections. And so, armed with a formidable arsenal of data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to conduct a thorough investigation into this intriguing relationship. As we embarked on this statistical odyssey, we embraced the challenge of unearthing patterns that might initially seem as perplexing as physics jokes at a biology convention.
Drawing upon data spanning more than two decades, our pursuit of statistical enlightenment led us to a notable correlation coefficient of 0.9596114, accompanied by a p-value that would make even the most skeptical statistician raise an eyebrow – less than 0.01. Yes, folks, we're talking statistically significant findings that would make any seasoned researcher do a double-take and wonder if they accidentally mixed up their data sheets with the lab's sudoku puzzles.
Amid the whirlwind of numbers and coefficients, we couldn't help but marvel at the sheer audacity of this correlation that transcended geographical and sectoral boundaries. The baffling beauty of statistical significance can sometimes make one wonder if we're participants in a cosmic experiment where variables are tossed into the mix just to see what unexpected relationships might sprout – a bit like trying to predict the outcome of a science experiment conducted in the whimsical world of Dr. Seuss.
As we delve deeper into the fabric of our findings, we venture to unveil the compelling narrative that underpins the synergy between the agricultural ingenuity of the Midwest and the energy demands of a bustling island halfway across the globe. Our study doesn't just stop at the surface-level astonishment of this correlation; it carves a path through the scientific underbrush to illuminate the intricate dance between agricultural innovation and the evolving rhythm of global energy production.
In a world where sectors and industries often appear siloed, our statistical insights serve to reveal the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate domains. For it's not every day that the humble soybean in the heartland of the United States joins forces with the towering turbines of Taiwan to generate energy in tandem, akin to a harmonious duet between two unexpected operatic performers – a verdant soprano from the fields and a mechanical tenor from the power plants.
Brace yourselves, dear reader, as we embark on this journey of agricultural alchemy and energy entanglement, uncovering the delightfully improbable connection between GMO soybeans and biomass power. Through the lens of our statistical saga, we invite you to witness the transcendence of conventional boundaries and the whimsical symphony born of this unanticipated alliance. So, strap on your statistical seatbelt and get ready for a wild ride through the intertwined realms of agriculture and energy – where correlations speak volumes, and statistical significance becomes the stuff of scientific folklore.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon scrutinizing the data with a fervor matched only by a physicist at an art gallery, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9596114 between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the generation of biomass power in Taiwan. This correlation, akin to finding a four-leaf clover in a soybean field, exuded a confidence interval with an r-squared value of 0.9208541, and a p-value that would make any skeptic do a double-take – less than 0.01. It's the kind of statistical significance that turns heads and raises eyebrows, prompting even the most seasoned researchers to contemplate the remarkable interplay between these seemingly unrelated variables.

To visually encapsulate the striking relationship we discovered, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the robust correlation between GMO soybeans in the land of ten thousand lakes and the burgeoning biomass power industry in the heart of East Asia. It's a testament to the unexpected connections that can arise when agriculture and energy generation waltz together in the global statistical ballroom.

Like a serendipitous fusion of elements in a scientific experiment, our findings reveal a symbiotic relationship between GMO soybeans and biomass power that transcends geographical and sectoral boundaries. As we peel back the layers of this statistical onion, we invite you to partake in our journey of discovery, where statistical significance transforms into a tale of agricultural innovation harmonizing with the pulsating demands of energy generation. It's a story that unfolds like a whimsical scientific novella, revealing the harmonious synergy between unlikely partners – the humble soybean and the roaring turbines of a distant island.

In unraveling the statistical mystique surrounding this correlation, we not only shed light on the intricate dance between agricultural innovation and energy production but also chip away at the siloed barriers that often confine different sectors. The statistical zeitgeist illuminated by our study is a testament to the interconnectedness of disparate domains, where the once-improbable duet of soybeans and power plants now takes center stage, belting out a harmonious rendition of "It's Not Easy Being Green" alongside the relentless hum of renewable energy production.

Our results don't just paint a picture of statistical symmetry; they weave a narrative of unexpected correlations and the enchanting harmony of variables that dare to defy conventional boundaries. So fasten your statistical seatbelt, dear reader, for the whirlwind journey our findings have in store as we navigate the uncharted territory of GMO soybeans and biomass power, where statistical significance meets scientific storytelling with a wink and a nod to the whimsical world of research and discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota and Biomass power generated in Taiwan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Seeding Growth: The Genetically Modified Connection Between Soybeans in Minnesota and Biomass Power in Taiwan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
As the global demand for renewable energy sources continues to grow, the connection between agricultural practices and energy production has become a subject of significant interest. In this study, we delve into the unexpected relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the generation of biomass power in Taiwan. Leveraging data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to explore this intriguing correlation.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9596114, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning from the years 2000 to 2021. While the implications of this association may appear unconventional at first glance, our study sheds light on the interplay between agricultural innovation and the evolving landscape of global energy production. The results of this investigation not only offer valuable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders but also contribute to a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate sectors.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The burgeoning intersection between agricultural practices and energy production has prompted an array of scholarly inquiries, with the aim of unraveling the remarkable connections that underpin these seemingly disparate realms. As we delve into this curious correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the generation of biomass power in Taiwan, we find ourselves peering into the array of studies and literature that have attempted to shed light on this captivating relationship.
Smith and colleagues in "Agricultural Innovations and Energy Dynamics" highlight the far-reaching implications of agricultural innovations on energy production, though notably omitting any mention of soybean-biomass power synergies. Doe, in "Bioengineered Crops and Environmental Impact," elucidates the complex ecosystem dynamics engendered by bioengineered crops, directing our attention to the intricate web of interconnections that span beyond conventional agricultural boundaries. Jones, in "The Power Matrix: Exploring Energy Generation," offers a comprehensive overview of diverse energy generation methods, yet regrettably overlooks the unforeseen tie that binds the soybean fields of the Midwest to the energy landscape of Taiwan.
Venturing into non-fiction literature, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "The Sixth Extinction" by Elizabeth Kolbert present gripping accounts of the interplay between human interventions in agriculture and their ecological ramifications. Though laudably informative, these works inexplicably fail to venture into the realm of transcontinental agricultural-energetic symbioses that form the crux of our investigation.
In the realm of fiction, "The Soybean Cipher" by Agatha Cornstarch and "Biomass Blues" by Clive Cropsalot offer spellbinding tales of intrigue and suspense, captivating readers with their imaginative exploits centered around agricultural mysteries and energy enigmas. While entertaining, these literary works, unfortunately, lack the rigor and empirical grounding necessary to provide insights into our empirical inquiry.
As we meander further through the literary landscape, we could not help but recall childhood favorites such as "The Magic School Bus" and "Captain Planet," where the interconnectedness of ecosystems and the impact of human activities on the environment were recurrent themes. Though enduringly entertaining, these animated classics failed to prepare us for the unanticipated relationship we uncovered between soybean genetics and biomass energy production.
Amidst this literary tapestry, our findings stand as a testament to the unexpected twists and turns that scientific inquiry often unveils, proving that truth is indeed stranger than fiction. With scholarly literature and literary escapades at our disposal, we forge ahead to untangle the enigmatic correlation between GMO soybeans and biomass power, offering a potent blend of statistical revelations and whimsical wonderment.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon scrutinizing the data with a fervor matched only by a physicist at an art gallery, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9596114 between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the generation of biomass power in Taiwan. This correlation, akin to finding a four-leaf clover in a soybean field, exuded a confidence interval with an r-squared value of 0.9208541, and a p-value that would make any skeptic do a double-take – less than 0.01. It's the kind of statistical significance that turns heads and raises eyebrows, prompting even the most seasoned researchers to contemplate the remarkable interplay between these seemingly unrelated variables.
To visually encapsulate the striking relationship we discovered, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the robust correlation between GMO soybeans in the land of ten thousand lakes and the burgeoning biomass power industry in the heart of East Asia. It's a testament to the unexpected connections that can arise when agriculture and energy generation waltz together in the global statistical ballroom.
Like a serendipitous fusion of elements in a scientific experiment, our findings reveal a symbiotic relationship between GMO soybeans and biomass power that transcends geographical and sectoral boundaries. As we peel back the layers of this statistical onion, we invite you to partake in our journey of discovery, where statistical significance transforms into a tale of agricultural innovation harmonizing with the pulsating demands of energy generation. It's a story that unfolds like a whimsical scientific novella, revealing the harmonious synergy between unlikely partners – the humble soybean and the roaring turbines of a distant island.
In unraveling the statistical mystique surrounding this correlation, we not only shed light on the intricate dance between agricultural innovation and energy production but also chip away at the siloed barriers that often confine different sectors. The statistical zeitgeist illuminated by our study is a testament to the interconnectedness of disparate domains, where the once-improbable duet of soybeans and power plants now takes center stage, belting out a harmonious rendition of "It's Not Easy Being Green" alongside the relentless hum of renewable energy production.
Our results don't just paint a picture of statistical symmetry; they weave a narrative of unexpected correlations and the enchanting harmony of variables that dare to defy conventional boundaries. So fasten your statistical seatbelt, dear reader, for the whirlwind journey our findings have in store as we navigate the uncharted territory of GMO soybeans and biomass power, where statistical significance meets scientific storytelling with a wink and a nod to the whimsical world of research and discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Uncovering the robust correlation between genetically modified soybeans in the land of 10,000 lakes and the burgeoning biomass power industry in the heart of East Asia feels somewhat akin to stumbling upon a scientific Easter egg hunt. Our results not only support the speculative musings of previous studies but elevate the tantalizing possibilities of transcontinental agricultural-energetic symbiosis, akin to discovering a unicorn grazing in a soybean field.

Venturing into the annals of scholarly literature, Smith and colleagues' oversight of the soybean-biomass power synergy now emerges as a foreboding omission, akin to overlooking the elusive Sasquatch in a statistical forest. Simultaneously, the baffling absence of "The Magic School Bus" and "Captain Planet" in predicting our unanticipated relationship seemingly leaves these childhood favorites stranded on an ecological island bereft of transcontinental energy exploration. The cynosure of our study, albeit rooted in tangible data and rigorous analysis, evokes a whimsical scientific novella, where GMO soybeans and biomass power prance through the pages hand in hand, echoing a harmonious duet that defies the laws of conventional statistical physics.

The statistical significance that shimmers like a unicorn in our data serves as a clarion call, resonating deeply with the pulsating demands of energy generation, reminiscent of an electrifying performance that elicits both applause and incredulity. It accentuates the rhapsodic symphony unfurling between these unlikely partners – the unassuming soybean and the formidable turbines of a distant island – yielding a veritable statistical masquerade that defies the constraints of sectoral boundaries.

We extend an invitation to fellow intrepid researchers and curious readers to cavort along the uncharted territory of our discovery, where agricultural innovation and energy production pirouette in a statistical ballet that transcends mere data points. Our findings, dressed in the robes of statistical insignia, beckon us to revel in the delightful whimsy of scientific inquiry, where the unexpected correlations and the enchanting harmony of variables dramatize the venerable dance of GMO soybeans and biomass power in a metaphoric ballroom, harmonizing with a wink and a nod to the captivating world of research and discovery.

The research paper has been a product of our ingenuity, and we hope you agree with our interpretation of this given topic.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota and Biomass power generated in Taiwan. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Seeding Growth: The Genetically Modified Connection Between Soybeans in Minnesota and Biomass Power in Taiwan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
As the global demand for renewable energy sources continues to grow, the connection between agricultural practices and energy production has become a subject of significant interest. In this study, we delve into the unexpected relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the generation of biomass power in Taiwan. Leveraging data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to explore this intriguing correlation.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9596114, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning from the years 2000 to 2021. While the implications of this association may appear unconventional at first glance, our study sheds light on the interplay between agricultural innovation and the evolving landscape of global energy production. The results of this investigation not only offer valuable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders but also contribute to a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate sectors.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the old adage goes, "You reap what you sow," and in the realm of agricultural and energy production, this sentiment takes on a whole new meaning. Amid the ever-growing quest for sustainable and renewable energy sources, the intersection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean cultivation and biomass power generation has emerged as a captivating area of inquiry. While some might dismiss it as the plot of a niche sci-fi novel, our research seeks to unravel the unexpected link between soybeans flourishing in the fields of Minnesota and the hum of biomass power plants in Taiwan.
The study of statistical correlations in scientific research can be like hunting for statistical needles in a data haystack – a task that requires both methodical precision and a keen eye for unexpected connections. And so, armed with a formidable arsenal of data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we set out to conduct a thorough investigation into this intriguing relationship. As we embarked on this statistical odyssey, we embraced the challenge of unearthing patterns that might initially seem as perplexing as physics jokes at a biology convention.
Drawing upon data spanning more than two decades, our pursuit of statistical enlightenment led us to a notable correlation coefficient of 0.9596114, accompanied by a p-value that would make even the most skeptical statistician raise an eyebrow – less than 0.01. Yes, folks, we're talking statistically significant findings that would make any seasoned researcher do a double-take and wonder if they accidentally mixed up their data sheets with the lab's sudoku puzzles.
Amid the whirlwind of numbers and coefficients, we couldn't help but marvel at the sheer audacity of this correlation that transcended geographical and sectoral boundaries. The baffling beauty of statistical significance can sometimes make one wonder if we're participants in a cosmic experiment where variables are tossed into the mix just to see what unexpected relationships might sprout – a bit like trying to predict the outcome of a science experiment conducted in the whimsical world of Dr. Seuss.
As we delve deeper into the fabric of our findings, we venture to unveil the compelling narrative that underpins the synergy between the agricultural ingenuity of the Midwest and the energy demands of a bustling island halfway across the globe. Our study doesn't just stop at the surface-level astonishment of this correlation; it carves a path through the scientific underbrush to illuminate the intricate dance between agricultural innovation and the evolving rhythm of global energy production.
In a world where sectors and industries often appear siloed, our statistical insights serve to reveal the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate domains. For it's not every day that the humble soybean in the heartland of the United States joins forces with the towering turbines of Taiwan to generate energy in tandem, akin to a harmonious duet between two unexpected operatic performers – a verdant soprano from the fields and a mechanical tenor from the power plants.
Brace yourselves, dear reader, as we embark on this journey of agricultural alchemy and energy entanglement, uncovering the delightfully improbable connection between GMO soybeans and biomass power. Through the lens of our statistical saga, we invite you to witness the transcendence of conventional boundaries and the whimsical symphony born of this unanticipated alliance. So, strap on your statistical seatbelt and get ready for a wild ride through the intertwined realms of agriculture and energy – where correlations speak volumes, and statistical significance becomes the stuff of scientific folklore.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon scrutinizing the data with a fervor matched only by a physicist at an art gallery, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9596114 between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the generation of biomass power in Taiwan. This correlation, akin to finding a four-leaf clover in a soybean field, exuded a confidence interval with an r-squared value of 0.9208541, and a p-value that would make any skeptic do a double-take – less than 0.01. It's the kind of statistical significance that turns heads and raises eyebrows, prompting even the most seasoned researchers to contemplate the remarkable interplay between these seemingly unrelated variables.
To visually encapsulate the striking relationship we discovered, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the robust correlation between GMO soybeans in the land of ten thousand lakes and the burgeoning biomass power industry in the heart of East Asia. It's a testament to the unexpected connections that can arise when agriculture and energy generation waltz together in the global statistical ballroom.
Like a serendipitous fusion of elements in a scientific experiment, our findings reveal a symbiotic relationship between GMO soybeans and biomass power that transcends geographical and sectoral boundaries. As we peel back the layers of this statistical onion, we invite you to partake in our journey of discovery, where statistical significance transforms into a tale of agricultural innovation harmonizing with the pulsating demands of energy generation. It's a story that unfolds like a whimsical scientific novella, revealing the harmonious synergy between unlikely partners – the humble soybean and the roaring turbines of a distant island.
In unraveling the statistical mystique surrounding this correlation, we not only shed light on the intricate dance between agricultural innovation and energy production but also chip away at the siloed barriers that often confine different sectors. The statistical zeitgeist illuminated by our study is a testament to the interconnectedness of disparate domains, where the once-improbable duet of soybeans and power plants now takes center stage, belting out a harmonious rendition of "It's Not Easy Being Green" alongside the relentless hum of renewable energy production.
Our results don't just paint a picture of statistical symmetry; they weave a narrative of unexpected correlations and the enchanting harmony of variables that dare to defy conventional boundaries. So fasten your statistical seatbelt, dear reader, for the whirlwind journey our findings have in store as we navigate the uncharted territory of GMO soybeans and biomass power, where statistical significance meets scientific storytelling with a wink and a nod to the whimsical world of research and discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the immortal words of Shakespeare, "What's in a seed? That which we call a soybean by any other name would smell as sweet... or power a biomass plant in Taiwan." Our findings illuminate a fascinating correlation that transcends geographic and sectoral boundaries, much like the unlikely friendship between a statistics textbook and a comedic novel – unexpected, yet undeniably intriguing.

As we draw the curtain on this statistical saga, we find ourselves at a crossroads where agricultural innovation and energy production converge in a merry dance of numbers and coefficients. The correlation coefficient of 0.9596114 stands as a testament to the harmonious synergy between genetically modified soybeans in the heartland of the United States and the hum of biomass power plants in the bustling isle of Taiwan – a relationship that emerges from the statistical woodwork like a charming anecdote in a sea of data.

In the spirit of scientific whimsy, we unveil this captivating narrative of statistical significance, where the soybean joins forces with the turbines of Taiwan to spin a tale of unconventional correlation. However, much like a good piece of statistical humor, our research has highlighted the impertinence of probing further into this peculiar interplay. For amidst the statistical circus, there's wisdom to be heeded: sometimes, the quirks and quips of correlations stand as unwavering testaments to the serendipitous symphony of scientific discoveries. Thus, we assert – with a statistical twinkle in our eyes – that no further research is needed in this realm.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Seeding Growth: The Genetically Modified Connection Between Soybeans in Minnesota and Biomass Power in Taiwan. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agrobiotechnology and Global Energy Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Seeding Growth: The Genetically Modified Connection Between Soybeans in Minnesota and Biomass Power in Taiwan. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Institute for Sustainable Agriculture and Global Development (IISAGD)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Seeding Growth: The Genetically Modified Connection Between Soybeans in Minnesota and Biomass Power in Taiwan with an abstract of As the global demand for renewable energy sources continues to grow, the connection between agricultural practices and energy production has become a subject of significant interest. In this study, we delve into the unexpected relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the generation of biomass power in Taiwan. Leveraging data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to explore this intriguing correlation.
Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9596114, with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning from the years 2000 to 2021. While the implications of this association may appear unconventional at first glance, our study sheds light on the interplay between agricultural innovation and the evolving landscape of global energy production. The results of this investigation not only offer valuable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders but also contribute to a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate sectors.

ChatGPT:

genetically modified soybeans, biomass power, Minnesota, Taiwan, agricultural practices, energy production, renewable energy sources, USDA, Energy Information Administration, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, global energy production, agricultural innovation, policymakers, industry stakeholders

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota
Detailed data title: Percent of soybeans planted in Minnesota that are genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota

Biomass power generated in Taiwan
Detailed data title: Total biomass power generated in Taiwan in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Biomass power generated in Taiwan

Correlation r = 0.9596114 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9208541 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 92.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Biomass power generated in Taiwan) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota) over the 22 years from 2000 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.8E-12. 0.0000000000017640311266281767
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 1.8E-10% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 566,883,421,106 random variables You don't actually need 566 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 21 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 21 because we have two variables measured over a period of 22 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.9, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota (GMO soybeans %)46637179828388929192939591939495969695959396
Biomass power generated in Taiwan (Billion kWh)1.792722.309862.78773.151013.34933.377323.377973.465563.361233.26553.397593.433043.41923.471243.575273.63043.601973.528713.751883.800863.753093.77279




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([46,63,71,79,82,83,88,92,91,92,93,95,91,93,94,95,96,96,95,95,93,96,])
array_2 = np.array([1.79272,2.30986,2.7877,3.15101,3.3493,3.37732,3.37797,3.46556,3.36123,3.2655,3.39759,3.43304,3.4192,3.47124,3.57527,3.6304,3.60197,3.52871,3.75188,3.80086,3.75309,3.77279,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota"
array_2_name = "Biomass power generated in Taiwan"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 4063 · Black Variable ID: 835 · Red Variable ID: 24024
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0