about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,041 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Los Angeles and the second variable is Burglaries in California.  The chart goes from 1985 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The cleaner air led to improved decision-making among potential burglars, who realized they could pursue more fulfilling careers instead of a life of crime. Now they're breaking into the job market instead of people's homes!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A photo-realistic image ] Show the iconic skyline of Los Angeles on a clear day, with the cityscape visible under a vibrant blue sky. The picturesque scene is marred by a subtle haze of lingering smog. In the foreground, a typical California neighborhood with palm trees and Spanish-style houses can be seen. In the distance, a silhouetted figure, the burglar, carefully peers into the skyline, noticing a distant police car approaching with improved visibility due to the reduced smog. As the police car draws near, the figure swiftly makes a subtle escape, blending into the surrounding environment undetected. This subtle action signifies the decrease in burglaries across the state due to the improved visibility brought about by cleaner air. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Los Angeles and Burglaries in California. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image Glitch art Hyper-realistic Realistic A scene from Skyrim
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Los Angeles and Burglaries in California, in the following situation: Because the decrease in air pollution in Los Angeles led to clearer air, the increased visibility allowed burglars to see the police coming from further away, giving them more time to escape. This decreased the likelihood of getting caught, resulting in a decrease in burglaries in California overall.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a clear day in Los Angeles, the skyline is visible under the blue sky, but a hazy smog still lingers in the air. Meanwhile, in a California neighborhood, a burglar looks in the distance and spots a police car approaching through the clear, smog-free air. With improved visibility, the burglar swiftly escapes undetected, leading to a decrease in burglaries across the state.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In a clear day in Los Angeles, the skyline is visible under the blue sky, but a hazy smog still lingers in the air. Meanwhile, in a California neighborhood, a burglar looks in the distance and spots a police car approaching through the clear, smog-free air. With improved visibility, the burglar swiftly escapes undetected, leading to a decrease in burglaries across the state. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A photo-realistic image ] Show the iconic skyline of Los Angeles on a clear day, with the cityscape visible under a vibrant blue sky. The picturesque scene is marred by a subtle haze of lingering smog. In the foreground, a typical California neighborhood with palm trees and Spanish-style houses can be seen. In the distance, a silhouetted figure, the burglar, carefully peers into the skyline, noticing a distant police car approaching with improved visibility due to the reduced smog. As the police car draws near, the figure swiftly makes a subtle escape, blending into the surrounding environment undetected. This subtle action signifies the decrease in burglaries across the state due to the improved visibility brought about by cleaner air.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Los Angeles caused Burglaries in California to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Air Affliction: Assessing the Association between Air Pollution in Los Angeles and Burglaries in California

The Journal of Environmental Criminology and Atmospheric Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Los Angeles and Burglaries in California. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9316017 and p < 0.01 for 1985 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Air Affliction: Assessing the Association between Air Pollution in Los Angeles and Burglaries in California

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the enigmatic connection between air pollution in the bustling city of Los Angeles and the prevalence of burglaries across the state of California. Through a meticulous analysis of data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our analysis yielded a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9316017 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the time period of 1985 to 2022. The implications of these findings not only shed light on the interplay between societal factors and environmental stressors but also serve as a stark reminder that even the air we breathe may influence the behavior of those around us. As we unravel this intriguing correlation, we hope to inspire further exploration into the hidden impact of air quality on society, and perhaps even a breath of fresh air in the realm of interdisciplinary research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Los Angeles and Burglaries in California. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Air Affliction: Assessing the Association between Air Pollution in Los Angeles and Burglaries in California

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the enigmatic connection between air pollution in the bustling city of Los Angeles and the prevalence of burglaries across the state of California. Through a meticulous analysis of data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our analysis yielded a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9316017 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the time period of 1985 to 2022. The implications of these findings not only shed light on the interplay between societal factors and environmental stressors but also serve as a stark reminder that even the air we breathe may influence the behavior of those around us. As we unravel this intriguing correlation, we hope to inspire further exploration into the hidden impact of air quality on society, and perhaps even a breath of fresh air in the realm of interdisciplinary research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
**[[INTRODUCTION]]**

Air pollution remains a persistent, noxious concern in metropolitan areas, crucial enough to suffocate the more lofty pursuits of our researcher souls. The smog-choked city of Los Angeles, with its fabled freeways and infamous inversion layers, has long been a veritable petri dish for investigating the deleterious effects of airborne pollutants. Meanwhile, the plight of burglaries across California invokes images of shadowy figures skulking under the cover of darkness, with more bated breaths than an eager laboratory mouse.

We venture to untangle the confounding web of variables connecting these distinct domains – the hazy atmosphere above and the criminal undercurrent below. The aim of this study is to elucidate whether a correlation exists between the air we begrudgingly inhale and the criminal activities that remain a persistent scourge upon our peaceful enclaves.

Despite the seeming dissimilarity between theft and what floats invisible and odorless in the aether, as researchers, we refuse to deny the possibility of hidden connections akin to subatomic particles, hiding in plain sight until prodded by the prodding stick of statistical inquiry.

Through a multifaceted analysis of ozone, particulate matter, and other atmospheric nuisances, we sought to discern any discernable relationship between air quality, or lack thereof, and the incidence of burglaries throughout California. Our methods, like a careful scientist tiptoeing through a minefield of confounding variables, involved rummaging through an extensive trove of data, vetted with all the rigor of a panel reviewing a grant proposal.

The results, while surprising, were not quite as earth-shattering as the punchline in a rainy cartoon. Nevertheless, we uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of approximately 0.9316017 with a p-value that would make any statistician worth their standard deviation positively squeal. This correlation, spanning nearly four decades, paints a picture - not quite the Mona Lisa, but more akin to a caricature sketch - of the potential impact of air pollution on criminal inclinations.

In the following sections, we endeavor to dissect and discuss the implications of this unexpected relationship, all the while championing the cause of interdisciplinary inquiry and raising a toast, or perhaps an air freshener, to the unexplored realms of science that await us. For now, the plot thickens, much like the smog over a particularly industrious urban sprawl, beckoning us to look beyond the surface and into the unseen.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Los Angeles and Burglaries in California. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Air Affliction: Assessing the Association between Air Pollution in Los Angeles and Burglaries in California

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the enigmatic connection between air pollution in the bustling city of Los Angeles and the prevalence of burglaries across the state of California. Through a meticulous analysis of data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our analysis yielded a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9316017 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the time period of 1985 to 2022. The implications of these findings not only shed light on the interplay between societal factors and environmental stressors but also serve as a stark reminder that even the air we breathe may influence the behavior of those around us. As we unravel this intriguing correlation, we hope to inspire further exploration into the hidden impact of air quality on society, and perhaps even a breath of fresh air in the realm of interdisciplinary research.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Air pollution remains a persistent, noxious concern in metropolitan areas, crucial enough to suffocate the more lofty pursuits of our researcher souls. The smog-choked city of Los Angeles, with its fabled freeways and infamous inversion layers, has long been a veritable petri dish for investigating the deleterious effects of airborne pollutants. Meanwhile, the plight of burglaries across California invokes images of shadowy figures skulking under the cover of darkness, with more bated breaths than an eager laboratory mouse.

We venture to untangle the confounding web of variables connecting these distinct domains – the hazy atmosphere above and the criminal undercurrent below. The aim of this study is to elucidate whether a correlation exists between the air we begrudgingly inhale and the criminal activities that remain a persistent scourge upon our peaceful enclaves.
Despite the seeming dissimilarity between theft and what floats invisible and odorless in the aether, as researchers, we refuse to deny the possibility of hidden connections akin to subatomic particles, hiding in plain sight until prodded by the prodding stick of statistical inquiry.
Through a multifaceted analysis of ozone, particulate matter, and other atmospheric nuisances, we sought to discern any discernable relationship between air quality, or lack thereof, and the incidence of burglaries throughout California. Our methods, like a careful scientist tiptoeing through a minefield of confounding variables, involved rummaging through an extensive trove of data, vetted with all the rigor of a panel reviewing a grant proposal.
The results, while surprising, were not quite as earth-shattering as the punchline in a rainy cartoon. Nevertheless, we uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of approximately 0.9316017 with a p-value that would make any statistician worth their standard deviation positively squeal. This correlation, spanning nearly four decades, paints a picture - not quite the Mona Lisa, but more akin to a caricature sketch - of the potential impact of air pollution on criminal inclinations.
In the following sections, we endeavor to dissect and discuss the implications of this unexpected relationship, all the while championing the cause of interdisciplinary inquiry and raising a toast, or perhaps an air freshener, to the unexplored realms of science that await us. For now, the plot thickens, much like the smog over a particularly industrious urban sprawl, beckoning us to look beyond the surface and into the unseen.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors uncovered a positive correlation between air pollution levels and criminal activities, shedding light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated environmental and societal factors. Similarly, "Doe and Johnson" discussed the potential impact of environmental stressors on human behavior, highlighting the need for further investigation into the subtle influences of our surroundings. Building upon this foundation, "Jones and Smith" explored the role of air quality in shaping community dynamics, revealing intriguing patterns that hint at a complex interplay between pollution and societal outcomes.

Moving beyond academic research, non-fiction literature on the topic offers valuable insights. "The Air We Breathe: An In-Depth Analysis of Urban Pollution" by Environmentalist & Co. provides a comprehensive overview of the various pollutants that linger in the atmosphere, drawing attention to the pervasive nature of air pollution in urban settings. Additionally, "Crime and Consequences: The Impact of Environmental Factors" by Criminologist Press delves into the potential link between environmental stressors and criminal behavior, showcasing how the physical environment may influence human actions in unexpected ways.

In the realm of fiction, the exploration of atmospheric influences on human behavior takes on an imaginative twist. "The Smog Conspiracy" by Mystery Writer X weaves a tale of intrigue and deception set against the backdrop of a polluted metropolis, drawing parallels between the murky air and the clandestine activities of its inhabitants. Similarly, "The Ozone Omen" by Sci-Fi Enthusiast Y presents a dystopian landscape where air pollution serves as a catalyst for nefarious deeds, blurring the line between environmental hazard and criminal motive.

Beyond traditional academic and literary sources, the authors conducted an exhaustive review of diverse media, including but not limited to: fortune cookies, horoscopes, grocery store receipts, and the occasional riddle from a popsicle stick. While the validity of these sources may be subject to debate, their contribution to the authors' overall understanding of air pollution and its potential influence on criminal behavior cannot be discounted outright.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Los Angeles and Burglaries in California. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 1985 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Air Affliction: Assessing the Association between Air Pollution in Los Angeles and Burglaries in California

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the enigmatic connection between air pollution in the bustling city of Los Angeles and the prevalence of burglaries across the state of California. Through a meticulous analysis of data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our analysis yielded a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9316017 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the time period of 1985 to 2022. The implications of these findings not only shed light on the interplay between societal factors and environmental stressors but also serve as a stark reminder that even the air we breathe may influence the behavior of those around us. As we unravel this intriguing correlation, we hope to inspire further exploration into the hidden impact of air quality on society, and perhaps even a breath of fresh air in the realm of interdisciplinary research.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Air pollution remains a persistent, noxious concern in metropolitan areas, crucial enough to suffocate the more lofty pursuits of our researcher souls. The smog-choked city of Los Angeles, with its fabled freeways and infamous inversion layers, has long been a veritable petri dish for investigating the deleterious effects of airborne pollutants. Meanwhile, the plight of burglaries across California invokes images of shadowy figures skulking under the cover of darkness, with more bated breaths than an eager laboratory mouse.

We venture to untangle the confounding web of variables connecting these distinct domains – the hazy atmosphere above and the criminal undercurrent below. The aim of this study is to elucidate whether a correlation exists between the air we begrudgingly inhale and the criminal activities that remain a persistent scourge upon our peaceful enclaves.
Despite the seeming dissimilarity between theft and what floats invisible and odorless in the aether, as researchers, we refuse to deny the possibility of hidden connections akin to subatomic particles, hiding in plain sight until prodded by the prodding stick of statistical inquiry.
Through a multifaceted analysis of ozone, particulate matter, and other atmospheric nuisances, we sought to discern any discernable relationship between air quality, or lack thereof, and the incidence of burglaries throughout California. Our methods, like a careful scientist tiptoeing through a minefield of confounding variables, involved rummaging through an extensive trove of data, vetted with all the rigor of a panel reviewing a grant proposal.
The results, while surprising, were not quite as earth-shattering as the punchline in a rainy cartoon. Nevertheless, we uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of approximately 0.9316017 with a p-value that would make any statistician worth their standard deviation positively squeal. This correlation, spanning nearly four decades, paints a picture - not quite the Mona Lisa, but more akin to a caricature sketch - of the potential impact of air pollution on criminal inclinations.
In the following sections, we endeavor to dissect and discuss the implications of this unexpected relationship, all the while championing the cause of interdisciplinary inquiry and raising a toast, or perhaps an air freshener, to the unexplored realms of science that await us. For now, the plot thickens, much like the smog over a particularly industrious urban sprawl, beckoning us to look beyond the surface and into the unseen.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this research study was as carefully constructed as a Jenga tower in a hurricane, combining elements of environmental analysis and crime statistics in a manner that would make even the most seasoned scholar do a double-take. Our approach involved a series of steps that may have seemed as convoluted as a hedge maze designed by a mischievous statistics professor, but bear with us as we lead you through the labyrinthine path of our methodology.

Data Collection:
Our research team embarked on a digital safari across the vast savannah of the internet, navigating the treacherous terrain of online databases and repositories like intrepid explorers seeking hidden treasures. We scoured the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) archives for atmospheric data, braving the labyrinth of spreadsheets and reports to uncover information on ozone levels, particulate matter, and other airborne villains. We also trawled through the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services' database, navigating the criminal hinterlands to extract data on reported burglaries in the state of California. It was a veritable pixelated treasure hunt, with each click bringing us closer to untold insights and a few more strands of greying hair.

Data Filtering and Preparation:
Once we had hauled our digital quarry back to the research lair, we subjected the data to a rigorous purification process that would have made a medieval alchemist proud. We filtered, cleaned, and scrubbed the datasets with the meticulousness of a hygiene-obsessed germaphobe, ensuring that only the most pristine and reliable data points would grace the hallowed halls of our analysis. Outliers were treated like unwanted party crashers, swiftly escorted out of the data set with all the grace and tact of a bouncer at an exclusive nightclub.

Statistical Analysis:
Armed with our purified datasets, we enlisted the aid of a battalion of statistical tools and tests, marching through the treacherous terrain of variable relationships and significance thresholds. We calculated correlation coefficients with the fervor of a wizard conjuring spells, seeking to unveil any hidden patterns that may have eluded the casual observer. Our pursuit of p-values would have put a treasure hunter's quest for buried gold to shame, as we sought to discern the significance of our findings amidst the statistical noise.

Time Period:
Our analysis encompassed data spanning the years 1985 to 2022, offering a comprehensive view of the temporal evolution of both air pollution in Los Angeles and the incidence of burglaries across California. This expansive time frame allowed us to capture the ebb and flow of atmospheric pollutants and criminal activities, akin to observing the tides of a statistical ocean.

Limitations:
It is important to acknowledge the limitations of our study, as no research endeavor is quite as bulletproof as a titanium-reinforced bunker. The potential for confounding variables and unexplored interactions between the myriad factors at play in both air quality and criminal behavior remains a specter haunting the halls of our analysis. Furthermore, the use of secondary data sources, while extensive and reliable, may introduce a degree of uncertainty akin to adding a dash of mystery to our findings.

The methodology adopted in this study encapsulated the essence of perseverance in statistical inquiry, blending the precision of laboratory science with the doggedness of forensic investigation. We hope that our labyrinthine journey through the nuances of data analysis offers a path for future researchers to follow, guiding them through the maze of interdisciplinary inquiry with the same spirit of inquiry and perhaps a hint of whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Los Angeles and Burglaries in California. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 1985 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9316017, r-squared of 0.8678818, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Air Affliction: Assessing the Association between Air Pollution in Los Angeles and Burglaries in California

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the enigmatic connection between air pollution in the bustling city of Los Angeles and the prevalence of burglaries across the state of California. Through a meticulous analysis of data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our analysis yielded a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9316017 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the time period of 1985 to 2022. The implications of these findings not only shed light on the interplay between societal factors and environmental stressors but also serve as a stark reminder that even the air we breathe may influence the behavior of those around us. As we unravel this intriguing correlation, we hope to inspire further exploration into the hidden impact of air quality on society, and perhaps even a breath of fresh air in the realm of interdisciplinary research.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Air pollution remains a persistent, noxious concern in metropolitan areas, crucial enough to suffocate the more lofty pursuits of our researcher souls. The smog-choked city of Los Angeles, with its fabled freeways and infamous inversion layers, has long been a veritable petri dish for investigating the deleterious effects of airborne pollutants. Meanwhile, the plight of burglaries across California invokes images of shadowy figures skulking under the cover of darkness, with more bated breaths than an eager laboratory mouse.

We venture to untangle the confounding web of variables connecting these distinct domains – the hazy atmosphere above and the criminal undercurrent below. The aim of this study is to elucidate whether a correlation exists between the air we begrudgingly inhale and the criminal activities that remain a persistent scourge upon our peaceful enclaves.
Despite the seeming dissimilarity between theft and what floats invisible and odorless in the aether, as researchers, we refuse to deny the possibility of hidden connections akin to subatomic particles, hiding in plain sight until prodded by the prodding stick of statistical inquiry.
Through a multifaceted analysis of ozone, particulate matter, and other atmospheric nuisances, we sought to discern any discernable relationship between air quality, or lack thereof, and the incidence of burglaries throughout California. Our methods, like a careful scientist tiptoeing through a minefield of confounding variables, involved rummaging through an extensive trove of data, vetted with all the rigor of a panel reviewing a grant proposal.
The results, while surprising, were not quite as earth-shattering as the punchline in a rainy cartoon. Nevertheless, we uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of approximately 0.9316017 with a p-value that would make any statistician worth their standard deviation positively squeal. This correlation, spanning nearly four decades, paints a picture - not quite the Mona Lisa, but more akin to a caricature sketch - of the potential impact of air pollution on criminal inclinations.
In the following sections, we endeavor to dissect and discuss the implications of this unexpected relationship, all the while championing the cause of interdisciplinary inquiry and raising a toast, or perhaps an air freshener, to the unexplored realms of science that await us. For now, the plot thickens, much like the smog over a particularly industrious urban sprawl, beckoning us to look beyond the surface and into the unseen.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon analyzing the extensive dataset meticulously gathered and curated by our intrepid team, we unearthed a striking correlation between air pollution in Los Angeles and burglaries across California. The correlation coefficient of 0.9316017 and an r-squared of 0.8678818 gleefully showed themselves, waltzing into our statistical analysis with all the grace of a lab rat navigating a maze.

The p-value less than 0.01, akin to a rare gem in the world of statistics, certified that the correlation between these seemingly disparate realms of atmospheric pollution and criminal activities was not a mere statistical fluke.

Additionally, the figure (Fig. 1) adorning this paper is a sight to behold – a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the strong correlation we observed, akin to catching a mischievous correlation coefficient red-handed.

These results not only astound with their statistical significance but also serve as a clarion call for further exploration into the underlying mechanisms at play. It seems that the air we huff and puff may have some influence on the shenanigans unfolding in the domain of theft and burglary.

In the following sections, we will delve into the implicative ramifications of this revelatory correlation and, with the spirit of inquiry, further probe the profound mysteries of interconnected scientific phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Los Angeles and Burglaries in California. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Air Affliction: Assessing the Association between Air Pollution in Los Angeles and Burglaries in California

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the enigmatic connection between air pollution in the bustling city of Los Angeles and the prevalence of burglaries across the state of California. Through a meticulous analysis of data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our analysis yielded a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9316017 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the time period of 1985 to 2022. The implications of these findings not only shed light on the interplay between societal factors and environmental stressors but also serve as a stark reminder that even the air we breathe may influence the behavior of those around us. As we unravel this intriguing correlation, we hope to inspire further exploration into the hidden impact of air quality on society, and perhaps even a breath of fresh air in the realm of interdisciplinary research.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors uncovered a positive correlation between air pollution levels and criminal activities, shedding light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated environmental and societal factors. Similarly, "Doe and Johnson" discussed the potential impact of environmental stressors on human behavior, highlighting the need for further investigation into the subtle influences of our surroundings. Building upon this foundation, "Jones and Smith" explored the role of air quality in shaping community dynamics, revealing intriguing patterns that hint at a complex interplay between pollution and societal outcomes.
Moving beyond academic research, non-fiction literature on the topic offers valuable insights. "The Air We Breathe: An In-Depth Analysis of Urban Pollution" by Environmentalist & Co. provides a comprehensive overview of the various pollutants that linger in the atmosphere, drawing attention to the pervasive nature of air pollution in urban settings. Additionally, "Crime and Consequences: The Impact of Environmental Factors" by Criminologist Press delves into the potential link between environmental stressors and criminal behavior, showcasing how the physical environment may influence human actions in unexpected ways.
In the realm of fiction, the exploration of atmospheric influences on human behavior takes on an imaginative twist. "The Smog Conspiracy" by Mystery Writer X weaves a tale of intrigue and deception set against the backdrop of a polluted metropolis, drawing parallels between the murky air and the clandestine activities of its inhabitants. Similarly, "The Ozone Omen" by Sci-Fi Enthusiast Y presents a dystopian landscape where air pollution serves as a catalyst for nefarious deeds, blurring the line between environmental hazard and criminal motive.
Beyond traditional academic and literary sources, the authors conducted an exhaustive review of diverse media, including but not limited to: fortune cookies, horoscopes, grocery store receipts, and the occasional riddle from a popsicle stick. While the validity of these sources may be subject to debate, their contribution to the authors' overall understanding of air pollution and its potential influence on criminal behavior cannot be discounted outright.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the extensive dataset meticulously gathered and curated by our intrepid team, we unearthed a striking correlation between air pollution in Los Angeles and burglaries across California. The correlation coefficient of 0.9316017 and an r-squared of 0.8678818 gleefully showed themselves, waltzing into our statistical analysis with all the grace of a lab rat navigating a maze.
The p-value less than 0.01, akin to a rare gem in the world of statistics, certified that the correlation between these seemingly disparate realms of atmospheric pollution and criminal activities was not a mere statistical fluke.
Additionally, the figure (Fig. 1) adorning this paper is a sight to behold – a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the strong correlation we observed, akin to catching a mischievous correlation coefficient red-handed.
These results not only astound with their statistical significance but also serve as a clarion call for further exploration into the underlying mechanisms at play. It seems that the air we huff and puff may have some influence on the shenanigans unfolding in the domain of theft and burglary.
In the following sections, we will delve into the implicative ramifications of this revelatory correlation and, with the spirit of inquiry, further probe the profound mysteries of interconnected scientific phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study have brought to light an intriguing link between air pollution in Los Angeles and the occurrence of burglaries across California. These findings not only bolster the existing body of research on the influence of environmental stressors on human behavior but also present a breath of fresh air in the exploration of interdisciplinary connections.

In line with the literature review, the positive correlation we observed between air pollution and criminal activities echoes the previous work of Smith et al., Doe and Johnson, and Jones and Smith. It seems that the invisible hand of pollution may be stirring up more than just a haze in the air. The anomalies presented in fictional works also find a peculiar semblance of truth in our empirical findings. The atmospheric influences in "The Smog Conspiracy" and "The Ozone Omen" are not as far-fetched as they may initially appear. Perhaps there is more to be learned from mystery writers and sci-fi enthusiasts than we previously thought.

The visual representation of our data, as depicted in Fig. 1, stands as a testament to the robustness of the correlation we have unveiled – a veritable Mona Lisa of statistical intrigue, if you will. The correlation coefficient and the p-value, akin to trusty sherlocks, have dutifully corroborated our findings, leaving no room for doubt in the courtroom of statistical significance.

While we take note of the whimsical sources consulted in the literature review, we stop short of accrediting grocery store receipts and fortune cookies as definitive sources of wisdom (despite their occasional strokes of insight). Nevertheless, the eclectic range of sources examined reflects our dedication to exhaustively exploring the enigmatic relationship between air quality and criminal behavior.

What lies ahead is a veritable treasure trove of questions and possibilities. As we march forward, armed with our statistical dowsing rods and methodological magnifying glasses, further investigations await. It is our hope that this discovery will serve as a breath of fresh air, invigorating the pursuit of hidden connections in the realm of scientific inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Los Angeles and Burglaries in California. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Air Affliction: Assessing the Association between Air Pollution in Los Angeles and Burglaries in California

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the enigmatic connection between air pollution in the bustling city of Los Angeles and the prevalence of burglaries across the state of California. Through a meticulous analysis of data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our analysis yielded a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9316017 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the time period of 1985 to 2022. The implications of these findings not only shed light on the interplay between societal factors and environmental stressors but also serve as a stark reminder that even the air we breathe may influence the behavior of those around us. As we unravel this intriguing correlation, we hope to inspire further exploration into the hidden impact of air quality on society, and perhaps even a breath of fresh air in the realm of interdisciplinary research.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Air pollution remains a persistent, noxious concern in metropolitan areas, crucial enough to suffocate the more lofty pursuits of our researcher souls. The smog-choked city of Los Angeles, with its fabled freeways and infamous inversion layers, has long been a veritable petri dish for investigating the deleterious effects of airborne pollutants. Meanwhile, the plight of burglaries across California invokes images of shadowy figures skulking under the cover of darkness, with more bated breaths than an eager laboratory mouse.

We venture to untangle the confounding web of variables connecting these distinct domains – the hazy atmosphere above and the criminal undercurrent below. The aim of this study is to elucidate whether a correlation exists between the air we begrudgingly inhale and the criminal activities that remain a persistent scourge upon our peaceful enclaves.
Despite the seeming dissimilarity between theft and what floats invisible and odorless in the aether, as researchers, we refuse to deny the possibility of hidden connections akin to subatomic particles, hiding in plain sight until prodded by the prodding stick of statistical inquiry.
Through a multifaceted analysis of ozone, particulate matter, and other atmospheric nuisances, we sought to discern any discernable relationship between air quality, or lack thereof, and the incidence of burglaries throughout California. Our methods, like a careful scientist tiptoeing through a minefield of confounding variables, involved rummaging through an extensive trove of data, vetted with all the rigor of a panel reviewing a grant proposal.
The results, while surprising, were not quite as earth-shattering as the punchline in a rainy cartoon. Nevertheless, we uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of approximately 0.9316017 with a p-value that would make any statistician worth their standard deviation positively squeal. This correlation, spanning nearly four decades, paints a picture - not quite the Mona Lisa, but more akin to a caricature sketch - of the potential impact of air pollution on criminal inclinations.
In the following sections, we endeavor to dissect and discuss the implications of this unexpected relationship, all the while championing the cause of interdisciplinary inquiry and raising a toast, or perhaps an air freshener, to the unexplored realms of science that await us. For now, the plot thickens, much like the smog over a particularly industrious urban sprawl, beckoning us to look beyond the surface and into the unseen.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the extensive dataset meticulously gathered and curated by our intrepid team, we unearthed a striking correlation between air pollution in Los Angeles and burglaries across California. The correlation coefficient of 0.9316017 and an r-squared of 0.8678818 gleefully showed themselves, waltzing into our statistical analysis with all the grace of a lab rat navigating a maze.
The p-value less than 0.01, akin to a rare gem in the world of statistics, certified that the correlation between these seemingly disparate realms of atmospheric pollution and criminal activities was not a mere statistical fluke.
Additionally, the figure (Fig. 1) adorning this paper is a sight to behold – a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the strong correlation we observed, akin to catching a mischievous correlation coefficient red-handed.
These results not only astound with their statistical significance but also serve as a clarion call for further exploration into the underlying mechanisms at play. It seems that the air we huff and puff may have some influence on the shenanigans unfolding in the domain of theft and burglary.
In the following sections, we will delve into the implicative ramifications of this revelatory correlation and, with the spirit of inquiry, further probe the profound mysteries of interconnected scientific phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has not only unveiled a robust correlation between the air pollution engulfing Los Angeles and the incidence of burglaries across California but also delved into the uncharted territory of atmospheric influences on criminal behavior. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9316017, akin to stumbling upon a glittering diamond amidst the statistical rough, unequivocally speaks to the tantalizing relationship between these seemingly disparate domains. Our findings, much like a curious character in a whodunit, have reignited interest in the obscured realm of environmental criminology, urging scholars to embrace the riddle of air quality and its insidious embrace on criminal tendencies. These results, while shedding light on the unexpected interplay between pollution and pilfering, also serve as a reminder that the unseen forces of our environment may wield a more substantial influence than we dare to imagine.

With these findings in hand, we encourage fellow researchers to ponder the implications of our discoveries and join us in championing the cause of interdisciplinary inquiries that might pan out more successfully than a well-timed gold rush. As we close the lid on this particular Pandora's box, we are inclined to prompt a chuckle or two from the enigmatic dance of data points, statistical significance, and the whimsical world of research.

Therefore, in the spirit of academic inquiry, we propose that no further research is needed in this peculiar intersection of atmospheric befoulment and felonious activities. It would seem our work here is clean as a whistle, leaving no room for more hot air on the subject.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Air Affliction: Assessing the Association between Air Pollution in Los Angeles and Burglaries in California. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Environmental Criminology and Atmospheric Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Air Affliction: Assessing the Association between Air Pollution in Los Angeles and Burglaries in California. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Urban Atmosphere and Crime Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Air Affliction: Assessing the Association between Air Pollution in Los Angeles and Burglaries in California with an abstract of This research paper delves into the enigmatic connection between air pollution in the bustling city of Los Angeles and the prevalence of burglaries across the state of California. Through a meticulous analysis of data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our analysis yielded a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9316017 with a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the time period of 1985 to 2022. The implications of these findings not only shed light on the interplay between societal factors and environmental stressors but also serve as a stark reminder that even the air we breathe may influence the behavior of those around us. As we unravel this intriguing correlation, we hope to inspire further exploration into the hidden impact of air quality on society, and perhaps even a breath of fresh air in the realm of interdisciplinary research.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, Los Angeles, burglaries, California, correlation, environmental stressors, correlation coefficient, p-value, societal factors, environmental impact, air quality, interdisciplinary research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Los Angeles
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Los Angeles

Burglaries in California
Detailed data title: The burglary rate per 100,000 residents in California
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Burglaries in California

Correlation r = 0.9316017 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8678818 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 86.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Burglaries in California) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Los Angeles) over the 38 years from 1985 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.1E-17. 0.0000000000000000212396448886
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 2.1E-15% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 47,081,766,444,067,632 random variables You don't actually need 47 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 37 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 37 because we have two variables measured over a period of 38 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.87, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Los Angeles (Bad air quality days)50.13753.424749.58957.37748.219239.72637.534240.437232.054833.698628.767121.584712.328812.60278.2191818.032816.712320.821924.657520.218616.712314.246610.13715.027313.42474.1095910.684910.10936.849327.6712310.4116.830612.60275.479457.9452117.21317.397268.21918
Burglaries in California (Burglary rate)1701.11696.41518.21447.11412.31345.41397.81384.913271222.51120.3979.4927.4823.5675.3656.3671.3681.2683.2686.1692.9678.1650.7647622.8612.9610.5646.8603.8522.4506.2479.2448.4417.2386.8369.7344.6371.9




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([50.137,53.4247,49.589,57.377,48.2192,39.726,37.5342,40.4372,32.0548,33.6986,28.7671,21.5847,12.3288,12.6027,8.21918,18.0328,16.7123,20.8219,24.6575,20.2186,16.7123,14.2466,10.137,15.0273,13.4247,4.10959,10.6849,10.1093,6.84932,7.67123,10.411,6.8306,12.6027,5.47945,7.94521,17.2131,7.39726,8.21918,])
array_2 = np.array([1701.1,1696.4,1518.2,1447.1,1412.3,1345.4,1397.8,1384.9,1327,1222.5,1120.3,979.4,927.4,823.5,675.3,656.3,671.3,681.2,683.2,686.1,692.9,678.1,650.7,647,622.8,612.9,610.5,646.8,603.8,522.4,506.2,479.2,448.4,417.2,386.8,369.7,344.6,371.9,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Los Angeles"
array_2_name = "Burglaries in California"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 4041 · Black Variable ID: 20839 · Red Variable ID: 20128
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0