about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,029 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Cottage cheese consumption and the second variable is Robberies in Ohio.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As people stopped snacking on cottage cheese, they found themselves less whey-stressed. This led to a feta state of mind, reducing the inclination to act colbytously and commit robberies. With a decrease in cottage cheese consumption, the curd was finally spreading peace instead of crimin-almond behavior.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: "Create an image of a serene Ohio town where residents leisurely relax on their porches, savoring cottage cheese amidst a light, scentless atmosphere. Meanwhile, a tense group of robbers attempt to navigate the quiet streets, anxious to remain undetected." The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Cottage cheese consumption and Robberies in Ohio. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Brutalism Cyber folk Cutsy graphics Low poly Magic realism
ChatGPT: Magic realism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Cottage cheese consumption and Robberies in Ohio, in the following situation: Because the decrease in Cottage cheese consumption led to less pungent gas, which made it harder for robbers to sneak around undetected in Ohio.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a quiet Ohio town, people sit on their porch enjoying cottage cheese, and the air is light without the pungent scent. Meanwhile, a frustrated group of robbers struggle to move unnoticed in the clear air, looking around nervously as they make their way down the street.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Magic realism ] and depicting this scene: In a quiet Ohio town, people sit on their porch enjoying cottage cheese, and the air is light without the pungent scent. Meanwhile, a frustrated group of robbers struggle to move unnoticed in the clear air, looking around nervously as they make their way down the street. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: "Create an image of a serene Ohio town where residents leisurely relax on their porches, savoring cottage cheese amidst a light, scentless atmosphere. Meanwhile, a tense group of robbers attempt to navigate the quiet streets, anxious to remain undetected."

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Cottage cheese consumption caused Robberies in Ohio to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Curd Consumption and Crime: Exploring the Curious Connection between Cottage Cheese and Robberies in Ohio

The Journal of Dairy Delinquency Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cottage cheese consumption and Robberies in Ohio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8927481 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Curd Consumption and Crime: Exploring the Curious Connection between Cottage Cheese and Robberies in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between food consumption and criminal behavior has long been a subject of academic curiosity. In this study, we delve into the peculiar association between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in the state of Ohio. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we conducted a rigorous analysis spanning over three decades (1990 - 2021). Our findings unveiled a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8927481 and statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01), suggesting a substantive link between the two variables. In essence, the more cottage cheese consumed, the higher the incidence of robberies. It appears that curds may indeed be curiously connected to crime rates.

As we explored this unorthodox relationship, the data seemed to curdle when we discovered the striking correlation. It's a case of "curd and crime" in Ohio, a cheesy statistic indeed. This research not only piques academic interest but also adds a layer of levity to the study of crime and nutrition. So next time you reach for a spoonful of cottage cheese, beware of the potential "robbery risk" it may bring to the table!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cottage cheese consumption and Robberies in Ohio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Curd Consumption and Crime: Exploring the Curious Connection between Cottage Cheese and Robberies in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between food consumption and criminal behavior has long been a subject of academic curiosity. In this study, we delve into the peculiar association between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in the state of Ohio. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we conducted a rigorous analysis spanning over three decades (1990 - 2021). Our findings unveiled a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8927481 and statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01), suggesting a substantive link between the two variables. In essence, the more cottage cheese consumed, the higher the incidence of robberies. It appears that curds may indeed be curiously connected to crime rates.

As we explored this unorthodox relationship, the data seemed to curdle when we discovered the striking correlation. It's a case of "curd and crime" in Ohio, a cheesy statistic indeed. This research not only piques academic interest but also adds a layer of levity to the study of crime and nutrition. So next time you reach for a spoonful of cottage cheese, beware of the potential "robbery risk" it may bring to the table!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As researchers, we strive to explore the uncharted territories of scientific inquiry, seeking to uncover unexpected connections and peculiar patterns that defy conventional wisdom. In this spirit, we turn our attention to the surprising relationship between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in the state of Ohio. As the famous saying goes, "When in doubt, feta it out!" and so we embarked on this adventure to examine the curious correlation that had not crossed the minds of even the keenest observer.

The intersection of nutrition and criminal behavior may not be the most obvious subject for investigation, but as intrepid explorers of academic landscapes, we are not afraid to tread where others may fear to venture. Our journey into this unusual realm began with the intriguing question: could there be a link, albeit a cheesy one, between the consumption of dairy delights and the rise in nefarious activities? Surely, this is a question to cheese and ponder.

Armed with data from the USDA and the FBI, we embarked on a statistical odyssey that took us through over three decades of information, meticulously analyzing the patterns and trends. It was a journey filled with unexpected twists and turns, much like the holes in a block of Swiss cheese. And as we sifted through the data, a cheddar of insight emerged, casting a light on a correlation that was as sharp as aged gouda.

While some may view this topic with skepticism, dismissing it as mere "brie-lief", our findings have undeniably shed light on a correlation that defies the conventional paradigms. Could it be that behind every stolen wallet, there lies a cheese-eating villain plotting their next heist? It's a gouda question, indeed—pun intended!

Stay tuned for the next installment in the 'Curd Chronicles' as we delve deeper into this fascinating link between dairy consumption and criminal activity. Remember, when it comes to research, the "pun"-derful possibilities are endless!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cottage cheese consumption and Robberies in Ohio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Curd Consumption and Crime: Exploring the Curious Connection between Cottage Cheese and Robberies in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between food consumption and criminal behavior has long been a subject of academic curiosity. In this study, we delve into the peculiar association between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in the state of Ohio. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we conducted a rigorous analysis spanning over three decades (1990 - 2021). Our findings unveiled a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8927481 and statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01), suggesting a substantive link between the two variables. In essence, the more cottage cheese consumed, the higher the incidence of robberies. It appears that curds may indeed be curiously connected to crime rates.

As we explored this unorthodox relationship, the data seemed to curdle when we discovered the striking correlation. It's a case of "curd and crime" in Ohio, a cheesy statistic indeed. This research not only piques academic interest but also adds a layer of levity to the study of crime and nutrition. So next time you reach for a spoonful of cottage cheese, beware of the potential "robbery risk" it may bring to the table!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As researchers, we strive to explore the uncharted territories of scientific inquiry, seeking to uncover unexpected connections and peculiar patterns that defy conventional wisdom. In this spirit, we turn our attention to the surprising relationship between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in the state of Ohio. As the famous saying goes, "When in doubt, feta it out!" and so we embarked on this adventure to examine the curious correlation that had not crossed the minds of even the keenest observer.
The intersection of nutrition and criminal behavior may not be the most obvious subject for investigation, but as intrepid explorers of academic landscapes, we are not afraid to tread where others may fear to venture. Our journey into this unusual realm began with the intriguing question: could there be a link, albeit a cheesy one, between the consumption of dairy delights and the rise in nefarious activities? Surely, this is a question to cheese and ponder.
Armed with data from the USDA and the FBI, we embarked on a statistical odyssey that took us through over three decades of information, meticulously analyzing the patterns and trends. It was a journey filled with unexpected twists and turns, much like the holes in a block of Swiss cheese. And as we sifted through the data, a cheddar of insight emerged, casting a light on a correlation that was as sharp as aged gouda.
While some may view this topic with skepticism, dismissing it as mere "brie-lief", our findings have undeniably shed light on a correlation that defies the conventional paradigms. Could it be that behind every stolen wallet, there lies a cheese-eating villain plotting their next heist? It's a gouda question, indeed—pun intended!
Stay tuned for the next installment in the 'Curd Chronicles' as we delve deeper into this fascinating link between dairy consumption and criminal activity. Remember, when it comes to research, the "pun"-derful possibilities are endless!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between unconventional variables and their unexpected connections has been a topic of interest across various fields of research. In "Milk and Misconduct" by Smith et al., the authors find a noteworthy correlation between dairy consumption and minor misdemeanors. Similarly, Doe's study "The Lactose Larceny: A Dairy Dilemma" explores the potential impact of cheese intake on criminal behavior, shedding light on the intricate link between dairy products and deviant activities.

Now, delving into more tangential sources, "The Big Cheese: A Comprehensive Guide to Dairy Delights" by Anne Curdson offers a rich exploration of cheese-related phenomena and its potential influence on human behavior. Likewise, "The Art of Robbery: A Thief's Tale" by Stan Robins presents fictional yet thought-provoking narratives that echo the intersection of dairy consumption and criminality.

In a Twitter thread by @CheeseBandit23, a series of anecdotal accounts suggest a curious surge in dairy aficionados with a penchant for pilfering. The posts argue that cottage cheese enthusiasts may have a tendency to "curd-le" towards a life of crime, adding a whimsical twist to the ongoing discourse about dairy products and delinquency.

It appears that the curious relationship between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in Ohio has garnered attention across various literary and online platforms, intertwining serious scholarship with a generous sprinkling of puns and jests. This peculiar topic has undoubtedly churned the academic landscape, leaving indelible marks that are as intriguing as they are amusing.

Indeed, as we navigate through this riveting literature, it is evident that the cheese may be both a source of nourishment and a catalyst for criminal capers. It seems that in the realm of research, one must always expect the unexpected, as even the most seemingly unrelated subjects may converge in curious and comical ways.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cottage cheese consumption and Robberies in Ohio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 1990 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Curd Consumption and Crime: Exploring the Curious Connection between Cottage Cheese and Robberies in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between food consumption and criminal behavior has long been a subject of academic curiosity. In this study, we delve into the peculiar association between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in the state of Ohio. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we conducted a rigorous analysis spanning over three decades (1990 - 2021). Our findings unveiled a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8927481 and statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01), suggesting a substantive link between the two variables. In essence, the more cottage cheese consumed, the higher the incidence of robberies. It appears that curds may indeed be curiously connected to crime rates.

As we explored this unorthodox relationship, the data seemed to curdle when we discovered the striking correlation. It's a case of "curd and crime" in Ohio, a cheesy statistic indeed. This research not only piques academic interest but also adds a layer of levity to the study of crime and nutrition. So next time you reach for a spoonful of cottage cheese, beware of the potential "robbery risk" it may bring to the table!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As researchers, we strive to explore the uncharted territories of scientific inquiry, seeking to uncover unexpected connections and peculiar patterns that defy conventional wisdom. In this spirit, we turn our attention to the surprising relationship between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in the state of Ohio. As the famous saying goes, "When in doubt, feta it out!" and so we embarked on this adventure to examine the curious correlation that had not crossed the minds of even the keenest observer.
The intersection of nutrition and criminal behavior may not be the most obvious subject for investigation, but as intrepid explorers of academic landscapes, we are not afraid to tread where others may fear to venture. Our journey into this unusual realm began with the intriguing question: could there be a link, albeit a cheesy one, between the consumption of dairy delights and the rise in nefarious activities? Surely, this is a question to cheese and ponder.
Armed with data from the USDA and the FBI, we embarked on a statistical odyssey that took us through over three decades of information, meticulously analyzing the patterns and trends. It was a journey filled with unexpected twists and turns, much like the holes in a block of Swiss cheese. And as we sifted through the data, a cheddar of insight emerged, casting a light on a correlation that was as sharp as aged gouda.
While some may view this topic with skepticism, dismissing it as mere "brie-lief", our findings have undeniably shed light on a correlation that defies the conventional paradigms. Could it be that behind every stolen wallet, there lies a cheese-eating villain plotting their next heist? It's a gouda question, indeed—pun intended!
Stay tuned for the next installment in the 'Curd Chronicles' as we delve deeper into this fascinating link between dairy consumption and criminal activity. Remember, when it comes to research, the "pun"-derful possibilities are endless!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In this study, we employed a meticulous and methodical approach to examine the intriguing relationship between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in the state of Ohio. Our data collection method was as precise as measuring the perfect amount of parmesan on a plate of pasta primavera. We gathered data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, spanning from 1990 to 2021, creating a robust dataset as rich and creamy as a velvety béchamel sauce.

To begin our investigation, we carefully curated and filtered the data, ensuring that we only included the most relevant and reliable information. Our approach was as thorough as a lab technician analyzing a sample under a microscope, leaving no whey-bit of data unexamined. The dataset was then homogenized, removing any potential outliers that may have soured our analysis.

Next, we unleashed the power of statistical analysis, utilizing a variety of methodologies that were as diverse as the flavors of artisanal cheese. We calculated the mean, median, and mode of cottage cheese consumption, ensuring that our analysis was as balanced as a well-made cheeseboard. We also examined the standard deviation, recognizing that just as every cheese has its unique flavor profile, every datapoint has its own variance.

With the robust dataset in our hands, we conducted correlation analyses to unearth the potential connection between cottage cheese consumption and robberies. Our statistical methods were as precise as a cheese slicer, carefully slicing through the data to reveal any hidden patterns or associations. We calculated Pearson's correlation coefficient, harnessing the power of numbers to quantify the relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.

In addition to correlation analyses, we employed regression models to delve deeper into the predictive power of cottage cheese consumption on robbery rates. Our regression analysis was as thorough as a cheese aging process, allowing us to determine the strength and direction of the relationship between these variables. The results of our regression models provided valuable insights, offering a glimpse into the potential impact of cottage cheese consumption on criminal activity.

Finally, to ensure the robustness and validity of our findings, we conducted sensitivity analyses and explored potential confounding variables. We meticulously controlled for external factors that could have influenced the relationship, recognizing that just as the right pairing can elevate a fine wine, controlling for confounders is essential in drawing accurate conclusions.

In summary, our methodology was as rigorous as a cheese-making process, carefully crafting each step to ensure the integrity and reliability of our findings. Through a combination of statistical analyses, regression models, and sensitivity analyses, we unveiled a correlation that was as compelling as a perfectly melted cheese pull. This study not only enriches the academic discourse but adds a savory twist to the intersection of nutrition and criminal behavior. Remember, conducting research is like making cheese – it's all about the curd and precision!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cottage cheese consumption and Robberies in Ohio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 1990 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8927481, r-squared of 0.7969991, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Curd Consumption and Crime: Exploring the Curious Connection between Cottage Cheese and Robberies in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between food consumption and criminal behavior has long been a subject of academic curiosity. In this study, we delve into the peculiar association between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in the state of Ohio. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we conducted a rigorous analysis spanning over three decades (1990 - 2021). Our findings unveiled a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8927481 and statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01), suggesting a substantive link between the two variables. In essence, the more cottage cheese consumed, the higher the incidence of robberies. It appears that curds may indeed be curiously connected to crime rates.

As we explored this unorthodox relationship, the data seemed to curdle when we discovered the striking correlation. It's a case of "curd and crime" in Ohio, a cheesy statistic indeed. This research not only piques academic interest but also adds a layer of levity to the study of crime and nutrition. So next time you reach for a spoonful of cottage cheese, beware of the potential "robbery risk" it may bring to the table!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As researchers, we strive to explore the uncharted territories of scientific inquiry, seeking to uncover unexpected connections and peculiar patterns that defy conventional wisdom. In this spirit, we turn our attention to the surprising relationship between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in the state of Ohio. As the famous saying goes, "When in doubt, feta it out!" and so we embarked on this adventure to examine the curious correlation that had not crossed the minds of even the keenest observer.
The intersection of nutrition and criminal behavior may not be the most obvious subject for investigation, but as intrepid explorers of academic landscapes, we are not afraid to tread where others may fear to venture. Our journey into this unusual realm began with the intriguing question: could there be a link, albeit a cheesy one, between the consumption of dairy delights and the rise in nefarious activities? Surely, this is a question to cheese and ponder.
Armed with data from the USDA and the FBI, we embarked on a statistical odyssey that took us through over three decades of information, meticulously analyzing the patterns and trends. It was a journey filled with unexpected twists and turns, much like the holes in a block of Swiss cheese. And as we sifted through the data, a cheddar of insight emerged, casting a light on a correlation that was as sharp as aged gouda.
While some may view this topic with skepticism, dismissing it as mere "brie-lief", our findings have undeniably shed light on a correlation that defies the conventional paradigms. Could it be that behind every stolen wallet, there lies a cheese-eating villain plotting their next heist? It's a gouda question, indeed—pun intended!
Stay tuned for the next installment in the 'Curd Chronicles' as we delve deeper into this fascinating link between dairy consumption and criminal activity. Remember, when it comes to research, the "pun"-derful possibilities are endless!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in Ohio, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8927481 and an r-squared value of 0.7969991. The p-value of less than 0.01 further underscored the statistical significance of this unexpected relationship. It seems that while cottage cheese may be creamy and delicious, it appears to have an unexpected side effect.

Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in Ohio. The data points form a pattern that is as clear as the holes in a block of Emmental cheese. It's almost as if the burglars were leaving a trail of cottage cheese behind at the crime scenes, leaving us to wonder, "who cut the cheese?"

Our findings not only challenge conventional wisdom but also add a layer of curiosity to the scientific inquiry. It seems that when it comes to crime rates, "cheddar is better" has taken on a whole new meaning, as the consumption of this dairy delight appears to be associated with an increase in criminal activities. Perhaps it's time to consider cottage cheese as a potential suspect in unsolved cases?

In conclusion, our research uncovers a noteworthy association between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in Ohio, providing a fresh perspective on the link between nutrition and criminal behavior. It's clear that the "whey" forward for future research in this area is to delve deeper into the mechanisms underlying this peculiar relationship. We are left with a question that is both thought-provoking and delightfully cheesy: Could curds and crime be more closely intertwined than previously thought? The answer remains to be "brie-vealed," but for now, it's a fascinating area ripe for further exploration. Remember, when it comes to research, the possibilities are "grate"!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cottage cheese consumption and Robberies in Ohio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Curd Consumption and Crime: Exploring the Curious Connection between Cottage Cheese and Robberies in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between food consumption and criminal behavior has long been a subject of academic curiosity. In this study, we delve into the peculiar association between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in the state of Ohio. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we conducted a rigorous analysis spanning over three decades (1990 - 2021). Our findings unveiled a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8927481 and statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01), suggesting a substantive link between the two variables. In essence, the more cottage cheese consumed, the higher the incidence of robberies. It appears that curds may indeed be curiously connected to crime rates.

As we explored this unorthodox relationship, the data seemed to curdle when we discovered the striking correlation. It's a case of "curd and crime" in Ohio, a cheesy statistic indeed. This research not only piques academic interest but also adds a layer of levity to the study of crime and nutrition. So next time you reach for a spoonful of cottage cheese, beware of the potential "robbery risk" it may bring to the table!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between unconventional variables and their unexpected connections has been a topic of interest across various fields of research. In "Milk and Misconduct" by Smith et al., the authors find a noteworthy correlation between dairy consumption and minor misdemeanors. Similarly, Doe's study "The Lactose Larceny: A Dairy Dilemma" explores the potential impact of cheese intake on criminal behavior, shedding light on the intricate link between dairy products and deviant activities.
Now, delving into more tangential sources, "The Big Cheese: A Comprehensive Guide to Dairy Delights" by Anne Curdson offers a rich exploration of cheese-related phenomena and its potential influence on human behavior. Likewise, "The Art of Robbery: A Thief's Tale" by Stan Robins presents fictional yet thought-provoking narratives that echo the intersection of dairy consumption and criminality.
In a Twitter thread by @CheeseBandit23, a series of anecdotal accounts suggest a curious surge in dairy aficionados with a penchant for pilfering. The posts argue that cottage cheese enthusiasts may have a tendency to "curd-le" towards a life of crime, adding a whimsical twist to the ongoing discourse about dairy products and delinquency.
It appears that the curious relationship between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in Ohio has garnered attention across various literary and online platforms, intertwining serious scholarship with a generous sprinkling of puns and jests. This peculiar topic has undoubtedly churned the academic landscape, leaving indelible marks that are as intriguing as they are amusing.
Indeed, as we navigate through this riveting literature, it is evident that the cheese may be both a source of nourishment and a catalyst for criminal capers. It seems that in the realm of research, one must always expect the unexpected, as even the most seemingly unrelated subjects may converge in curious and comical ways.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in Ohio, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8927481 and an r-squared value of 0.7969991. The p-value of less than 0.01 further underscored the statistical significance of this unexpected relationship. It seems that while cottage cheese may be creamy and delicious, it appears to have an unexpected side effect.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in Ohio. The data points form a pattern that is as clear as the holes in a block of Emmental cheese. It's almost as if the burglars were leaving a trail of cottage cheese behind at the crime scenes, leaving us to wonder, "who cut the cheese?"
Our findings not only challenge conventional wisdom but also add a layer of curiosity to the scientific inquiry. It seems that when it comes to crime rates, "cheddar is better" has taken on a whole new meaning, as the consumption of this dairy delight appears to be associated with an increase in criminal activities. Perhaps it's time to consider cottage cheese as a potential suspect in unsolved cases?
In conclusion, our research uncovers a noteworthy association between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in Ohio, providing a fresh perspective on the link between nutrition and criminal behavior. It's clear that the "whey" forward for future research in this area is to delve deeper into the mechanisms underlying this peculiar relationship. We are left with a question that is both thought-provoking and delightfully cheesy: Could curds and crime be more closely intertwined than previously thought? The answer remains to be "brie-vealed," but for now, it's a fascinating area ripe for further exploration. Remember, when it comes to research, the possibilities are "grate"!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study aptly resonate with the eccentric literature we encountered, providing empirical validation for the unexpected connection between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in Ohio. It appears that the cheesy tales of dairy-related delinquency were not just for "gouda" laughs after all. In line with the "milk and misconduct" study by Smith et al., we have added another layer to the dairy-delinquency discourse, showing that cheese, particularly cottage cheese, may indeed have a peculiar role in shaping criminal behavior.

It is as if the dairy aisle of research has become a playground for the unexpected, a place where the 'whey' things happen when least expected. Our results support the observations made by @CheeseBandit23, who, despite the whimsical pseudonym, seemed to have a sense of "grate" insight about the potential influence of cottage cheese consumption on criminal proclivities. Perhaps it's time to take the musings of social media more "seriously" in a not-so-serious manner?

As we reflect on the statistical significance of our findings, it becomes clear that the trajectory of this research took a turn akin to a wheel of Emmental cheese; unexpected, holey, and undoubtedly "cheesy." The correlation coefficient and r-squared values that emerged from our analysis may be as rock-solid as a wheel of aged cheddar, but the nature of the relationship they unveiled remains a fascinating enigma. It seems that the age-old adage "you are what you eat" is taking on a peculiar new twist in Ohio.

It's worth noting that though our study provides empirical support for this eccentric correlation, one cannot help but marvel at the whimsical nature of science and research. As researchers, we often find ourselves navigating through the "brie-lliant" yet bizarre realms of discovery, where the unexpected converges with the academic, and the serious intertwines with the silly.

The implications of our findings extend beyond the statistical intricacies of correlation coefficients and p-values. They merge with the mundane yet intriguing facets of everyday life, inviting us to ponder the mysteries that lie in the most unexpected places. Who would have thought that a humble serving of cottage cheese could have such intriguing implications for crime rates?

In conclusion, our study not only contributes to the body of knowledge on the unorthodox relationship between nutrition and criminal behavior but also serves as a testament to the sheer unpredictability and whimsy of scientific inquiry. As we proceed with further research in this curious domain, we are reminded that even the most peculiar connections may hold grains of truth, or in this case, microscopic curds of truth. After all, in the realm of scientific investigation, the unexpected often churns out the most fascinating discoveries.

And remember, when it comes to research, there's always "mature cheddar" to be gained from the most unassuming places!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cottage cheese consumption and Robberies in Ohio. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Curd Consumption and Crime: Exploring the Curious Connection between Cottage Cheese and Robberies in Ohio

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between food consumption and criminal behavior has long been a subject of academic curiosity. In this study, we delve into the peculiar association between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in the state of Ohio. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we conducted a rigorous analysis spanning over three decades (1990 - 2021). Our findings unveiled a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8927481 and statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01), suggesting a substantive link between the two variables. In essence, the more cottage cheese consumed, the higher the incidence of robberies. It appears that curds may indeed be curiously connected to crime rates.

As we explored this unorthodox relationship, the data seemed to curdle when we discovered the striking correlation. It's a case of "curd and crime" in Ohio, a cheesy statistic indeed. This research not only piques academic interest but also adds a layer of levity to the study of crime and nutrition. So next time you reach for a spoonful of cottage cheese, beware of the potential "robbery risk" it may bring to the table!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As researchers, we strive to explore the uncharted territories of scientific inquiry, seeking to uncover unexpected connections and peculiar patterns that defy conventional wisdom. In this spirit, we turn our attention to the surprising relationship between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in the state of Ohio. As the famous saying goes, "When in doubt, feta it out!" and so we embarked on this adventure to examine the curious correlation that had not crossed the minds of even the keenest observer.
The intersection of nutrition and criminal behavior may not be the most obvious subject for investigation, but as intrepid explorers of academic landscapes, we are not afraid to tread where others may fear to venture. Our journey into this unusual realm began with the intriguing question: could there be a link, albeit a cheesy one, between the consumption of dairy delights and the rise in nefarious activities? Surely, this is a question to cheese and ponder.
Armed with data from the USDA and the FBI, we embarked on a statistical odyssey that took us through over three decades of information, meticulously analyzing the patterns and trends. It was a journey filled with unexpected twists and turns, much like the holes in a block of Swiss cheese. And as we sifted through the data, a cheddar of insight emerged, casting a light on a correlation that was as sharp as aged gouda.
While some may view this topic with skepticism, dismissing it as mere "brie-lief", our findings have undeniably shed light on a correlation that defies the conventional paradigms. Could it be that behind every stolen wallet, there lies a cheese-eating villain plotting their next heist? It's a gouda question, indeed—pun intended!
Stay tuned for the next installment in the 'Curd Chronicles' as we delve deeper into this fascinating link between dairy consumption and criminal activity. Remember, when it comes to research, the "pun"-derful possibilities are endless!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in Ohio, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8927481 and an r-squared value of 0.7969991. The p-value of less than 0.01 further underscored the statistical significance of this unexpected relationship. It seems that while cottage cheese may be creamy and delicious, it appears to have an unexpected side effect.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in Ohio. The data points form a pattern that is as clear as the holes in a block of Emmental cheese. It's almost as if the burglars were leaving a trail of cottage cheese behind at the crime scenes, leaving us to wonder, "who cut the cheese?"
Our findings not only challenge conventional wisdom but also add a layer of curiosity to the scientific inquiry. It seems that when it comes to crime rates, "cheddar is better" has taken on a whole new meaning, as the consumption of this dairy delight appears to be associated with an increase in criminal activities. Perhaps it's time to consider cottage cheese as a potential suspect in unsolved cases?
In conclusion, our research uncovers a noteworthy association between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in Ohio, providing a fresh perspective on the link between nutrition and criminal behavior. It's clear that the "whey" forward for future research in this area is to delve deeper into the mechanisms underlying this peculiar relationship. We are left with a question that is both thought-provoking and delightfully cheesy: Could curds and crime be more closely intertwined than previously thought? The answer remains to be "brie-vealed," but for now, it's a fascinating area ripe for further exploration. Remember, when it comes to research, the possibilities are "grate"!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]
In this study, we sliced through the labyrinth of statistics, only to find a wedge of correlation between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in Ohio. The results not only add a layer of "cheese" to the academic discussion but also provoke thought on the "mature" relationship between food choices and crime rates – talk about a "grate" discovery!

As we wrap up this study, it's apparent that the correlation coefficient and p-value speak volumes, but let's not forget the pun-value and wittiness of the findings. With a correlation this strong, one might even say the evidence is "over-dairy-whelming"! It seems the "cottage case" of curds and crime in Ohio may have more holes than a block of Gruyère.

It's time to bring this paper to a close, as no more research is needed in this area. After all, we've "Brie"-t all there is to "Brie"-t about the unexpected link between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in Ohio. Remember folks, when it comes to research, it's always a "gouda" time to explore new frontiers and uncover the "whey" things are the way they are!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Curd Consumption and Crime: Exploring the Curious Connection between Cottage Cheese and Robberies in Ohio. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Dairy Delinquency Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Curd Consumption and Crime: Exploring the Curious Connection between Cottage Cheese and Robberies in Ohio. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute of Dairy Delights and Deviant Behavior


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Curd Consumption and Crime: Exploring the Curious Connection between Cottage Cheese and Robberies in Ohio with an abstract of The relationship between food consumption and criminal behavior has long been a subject of academic curiosity. In this study, we delve into the peculiar association between cottage cheese consumption and robberies in the state of Ohio. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we conducted a rigorous analysis spanning over three decades (1990 - 2021). Our findings unveiled a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8927481 and statistically significant p-value (p < 0.01), suggesting a substantive link between the two variables. In essence, the more cottage cheese consumed, the higher the incidence of robberies. It appears that curds may indeed be curiously connected to crime rates.
As we explored this unorthodox relationship, the data seemed to curdle when we discovered the striking correlation. It's a case of "curd and crime" in Ohio, a cheesy statistic indeed. This research not only piques academic interest but also adds a layer of levity to the study of crime and nutrition. So next time you reach for a spoonful of cottage cheese, beware of the potential "robbery risk" it may bring to the table!

ChatGPT:

curd consumption, cottage cheese, crime statistics, food consumption and criminal behavior, Ohio crime rates, cottage cheese consumption and robberies, correlation between food consumption and crime, FBI crime statistics, USDA food consumption data

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Cottage cheese consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of Cottage cheese in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Cottage cheese consumption

Robberies in Ohio
Detailed data title: The robbery rate per 100,000 residents in Ohio
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Robberies in Ohio

Correlation r = 0.8927481 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7969991 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 79.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Robberies in Ohio) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Cottage cheese consumption) over the 32 years from 1990 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.6E-12. 0.0000000000065781853651532010
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 6.6E-10% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 152,017,607,363 random variables You don't actually need 152 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 31 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 31 because we have two variables measured over a period of 32 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.79, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Cottage cheese consumption (Pounds per person)3.33.23.12.92.82.72.62.62.62.62.62.62.62.62.72.72.62.62.32.42.32.32.32.12.12.12.22.12.12.121.9
Robberies in Ohio (Robbery rate)188.5215.2199192.7187.5178.7164.1158.7133.5128137.5151156.6147.7152.2162.8169.2160162.9153.1142.9138.6133.3125.2110.2108.7108.296.282.375.866.959.3




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3.3,3.2,3.1,2.9,2.8,2.7,2.6,2.6,2.6,2.6,2.6,2.6,2.6,2.6,2.7,2.7,2.6,2.6,2.3,2.4,2.3,2.3,2.3,2.1,2.1,2.1,2.2,2.1,2.1,2.1,2,1.9,])
array_2 = np.array([188.5,215.2,199,192.7,187.5,178.7,164.1,158.7,133.5,128,137.5,151,156.6,147.7,152.2,162.8,169.2,160,162.9,153.1,142.9,138.6,133.3,125.2,110.2,108.7,108.2,96.2,82.3,75.8,66.9,59.3,])
array_1_name = "Cottage cheese consumption"
array_2_name = "Robberies in Ohio"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 4029 · Black Variable ID: 556 · Red Variable ID: 20210
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0