Report an error
Robberies in Ohio correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Gasoline pumped in Germany, West | r=1 | 6yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in gender studies | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Molly | r=0.92 | 38yrs | No |
Cottage cheese consumption | r=0.89 | 32yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'oprah winfrey' | r=0.89 | 19yrs | No |
Annual book sales in the US | r=0.86 | 11yrs | No |
Robberies in Ohio also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)