about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,983 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee and the second variable is FA Cup final goal difference.  The chart goes from 1983 to 1997, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air quality in Cleveland, Tennessee improved, it led to an unexpected surge in soccer skills across the pond. The players in the FA Cup final found themselves able to run faster, kick with more precision, and execute flawless headers, ultimately decreasing the goal difference. It seems like cleaner air in the US has become the secret weapon for soccer glory in the UK!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that illustrates the scene of soccer players on a field in Cleveland, Tennessee, with the smog lifting to reveal clear skies. Capture the players taking deep breaths of fresh air and feel revived as they play in the FA Cup final. Emphasize the players charging towards the goal with renewed energy and enthusiasm, scoring goals and closing the goal difference. Show a clear distinction between the smoggy environment and the newfound clarity and energy on the field. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee and FA Cup final goal difference. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A Discovery magazine cover image a funny image you would see on reddit Steampunk Vaporwave Voxel art
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee and FA Cup final goal difference, in the following situation: As the smog cleared in Cleveland, Tennessee, it allowed the soccer players to breathe easier, leading to better stamina and sharper focus in the FA Cup final. The decrease in air pollution literally cleared the way for the teams to score more goals, reducing the goal difference.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: The smog lifts over Cleveland, Tennessee, as the soccer players on the field take deep breaths of fresh air. With renewed energy and clear lungs, they charge towards the goal in the FA Cup final, scoring more goals and diminishing the goal difference.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: The smog lifts over Cleveland, Tennessee, as the soccer players on the field take deep breaths of fresh air. With renewed energy and clear lungs, they charge towards the goal in the FA Cup final, scoring more goals and diminishing the goal difference. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that illustrates the scene of soccer players on a field in Cleveland, Tennessee, with the smog lifting to reveal clear skies. Capture the players taking deep breaths of fresh air and feel revived as they play in the FA Cup final. Emphasize the players charging towards the goal with renewed energy and enthusiasm, scoring goals and closing the goal difference. Show a clear distinction between the smoggy environment and the newfound clarity and energy on the field.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee caused FA Cup final goal difference to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Blowing the Whistle: Exploring the Impacts of Air Pollution on FA Cup Final Goal Difference in Cleveland, Tennessee

The Journal of Quirky Environmental Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee and FA Cup final goal difference. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and My Foot Ball Facts to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8119664 and p < 0.01 for 1983 to 1997.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing the Whistle: Exploring the Impacts of Air Pollution on FA Cup Final Goal Difference in Cleveland, Tennessee"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intersection of environmental factors and football outcomes, with a focus on the effects of air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee, on the goal difference in FA Cup finals. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and My Foot Ball Facts, we embarked on a journey to uncover the relationship between smog and soccer. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8119664 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1983 to 1997. Our findings not only shed light on the potential impact of air quality on sports performance, but also highlight the whimsical connections that can emerge when unexpected variables are brought into the mix. So, next time you find yourself pondering the outcome of a football match, be sure to check the local air quality report - because in Cleveland, Tennessee, it may just be a breath of fresh air that determines the score!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee and FA Cup final goal difference. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing the Whistle: Exploring the Impacts of Air Pollution on FA Cup Final Goal Difference in Cleveland, Tennessee"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intersection of environmental factors and football outcomes, with a focus on the effects of air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee, on the goal difference in FA Cup finals. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and My Foot Ball Facts, we embarked on a journey to uncover the relationship between smog and soccer. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8119664 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1983 to 1997. Our findings not only shed light on the potential impact of air quality on sports performance, but also highlight the whimsical connections that can emerge when unexpected variables are brought into the mix. So, next time you find yourself pondering the outcome of a football match, be sure to check the local air quality report - because in Cleveland, Tennessee, it may just be a breath of fresh air that determines the score!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of academia often calls for rigorous analysis and precise methodology, but every now and then, it's refreshing to step into uncharted territories and explore the whimsical connections that emerge when unexpected variables are brought into the mix. In this particular study, we ventured into the murky realm where environmental pollution meets the excitement of football, specifically delving into the impact of air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee, on the goal difference in FA Cup finals. As we embarked on this peculiar journey, guided by the wisdom of data and the thrill of discovery, we couldn't help but marvel at the quirkiness of our pursuit.

Our fascination with this topic was not merely a flight of fancy – indeed, the fusion of environmental factors and football outcomes led us to uncover surprising insights that merit attention. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the curious arsenal of football knowledge provided by My Foot Ball Facts, we set out to unravel the secrets lurking within the nexus of smog and soccer.

As we delved into this intersection, we encountered a range of challenges and technical conundrums, but we were not deterred. Instead, we marched forward, with the spirit of inquiry as our compass and the tenets of scientific rigor as our guide. Our quest was spurred by a mix of curiosity, skepticism, and perhaps a sprinkling of eccentricity, and through it all, we remained steadfast in our determination to extract meaningful insights from this unexpected pairing.

And so, through the following pages, we invite you to embark on a peculiar voyage with us. Prepare to witness the fusion of football fervor and environmental erudition, and be prepared for a study that doesn't just blow the whistle on air pollution but also entices us to ponder the whimsical interplay of seemingly disparate elements. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, for we are about to embark on a journey that promises to score big in the realm of scholarly amusement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee and FA Cup final goal difference. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing the Whistle: Exploring the Impacts of Air Pollution on FA Cup Final Goal Difference in Cleveland, Tennessee"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intersection of environmental factors and football outcomes, with a focus on the effects of air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee, on the goal difference in FA Cup finals. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and My Foot Ball Facts, we embarked on a journey to uncover the relationship between smog and soccer. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8119664 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1983 to 1997. Our findings not only shed light on the potential impact of air quality on sports performance, but also highlight the whimsical connections that can emerge when unexpected variables are brought into the mix. So, next time you find yourself pondering the outcome of a football match, be sure to check the local air quality report - because in Cleveland, Tennessee, it may just be a breath of fresh air that determines the score!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of academia often calls for rigorous analysis and precise methodology, but every now and then, it's refreshing to step into uncharted territories and explore the whimsical connections that emerge when unexpected variables are brought into the mix. In this particular study, we ventured into the murky realm where environmental pollution meets the excitement of football, specifically delving into the impact of air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee, on the goal difference in FA Cup finals. As we embarked on this peculiar journey, guided by the wisdom of data and the thrill of discovery, we couldn't help but marvel at the quirkiness of our pursuit.
Our fascination with this topic was not merely a flight of fancy – indeed, the fusion of environmental factors and football outcomes led us to uncover surprising insights that merit attention. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the curious arsenal of football knowledge provided by My Foot Ball Facts, we set out to unravel the secrets lurking within the nexus of smog and soccer.
As we delved into this intersection, we encountered a range of challenges and technical conundrums, but we were not deterred. Instead, we marched forward, with the spirit of inquiry as our compass and the tenets of scientific rigor as our guide. Our quest was spurred by a mix of curiosity, skepticism, and perhaps a sprinkling of eccentricity, and through it all, we remained steadfast in our determination to extract meaningful insights from this unexpected pairing.
And so, through the following pages, we invite you to embark on a peculiar voyage with us. Prepare to witness the fusion of football fervor and environmental erudition, and be prepared for a study that doesn't just blow the whistle on air pollution but also entices us to ponder the whimsical interplay of seemingly disparate elements. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, for we are about to embark on a journey that promises to score big in the realm of scholarly amusement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "The Impact of Air Pollution on Urban Environments" by Smith, the authors find compelling evidence of the detrimental effects of air pollution on human health and environmental quality. The study underscores the urgency of mitigating air pollution through stringent regulations and sustainable urban planning. Similarly, in "Environmental Factors in Sporting Events" by Doe, the authors highlight the importance of considering environmental variables in the context of sports performance, shedding light on the potential influences of weather and air quality on athletic outcomes. Moreover, Jones' research in "The Economic Implications of Environmental Degradation" reaffirms the significant societal and economic costs associated with air pollution, emphasizing the need for comprehensive interventions to address this pressing issue.

Moving beyond the realm of peer-reviewed studies, several non-fiction works such as "The Air We Breathe" by John Green and "Pollution: Past, Present, and Future" by Elizabeth Kolbert offer in-depth insights into the far-reaching consequences of air pollution on human well-being and the natural world. These scholarly publications provide a comprehensive overview of the complex interplay between pollutants and public health, underscoring the gravity of the challenges posed by environmental degradation.

On a lighter note, fictional works such as "The Smog Striker" by J.K. Rowling and "Soccer in the Hazy City" by Dan Brown, while not rooted in empirical research, present imaginative narratives that place air pollution and sports in whimsical contexts. These literary creations offer a departure from the conventional discourse, inviting readers to contemplate the fanciful connections between environmental factors and athletic endeavors.

Widening the scope of our literature review, we ventured into unconventional sources of knowledge, including perusing grocery store receipts, consulting with eccentric weather forecasters, and eavesdropping on heated discussions at local pubs. While these unorthodox methods may raise eyebrows in traditional academic circles, the insights gleaned from these unconventional sources proved to be invaluable in shaping our understanding of the peculiar relationship between air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee, and FA Cup final goal difference.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee and FA Cup final goal difference. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and My Foot Ball Facts . You used data from 1983 to 1997

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing the Whistle: Exploring the Impacts of Air Pollution on FA Cup Final Goal Difference in Cleveland, Tennessee"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intersection of environmental factors and football outcomes, with a focus on the effects of air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee, on the goal difference in FA Cup finals. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and My Foot Ball Facts, we embarked on a journey to uncover the relationship between smog and soccer. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8119664 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1983 to 1997. Our findings not only shed light on the potential impact of air quality on sports performance, but also highlight the whimsical connections that can emerge when unexpected variables are brought into the mix. So, next time you find yourself pondering the outcome of a football match, be sure to check the local air quality report - because in Cleveland, Tennessee, it may just be a breath of fresh air that determines the score!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of academia often calls for rigorous analysis and precise methodology, but every now and then, it's refreshing to step into uncharted territories and explore the whimsical connections that emerge when unexpected variables are brought into the mix. In this particular study, we ventured into the murky realm where environmental pollution meets the excitement of football, specifically delving into the impact of air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee, on the goal difference in FA Cup finals. As we embarked on this peculiar journey, guided by the wisdom of data and the thrill of discovery, we couldn't help but marvel at the quirkiness of our pursuit.
Our fascination with this topic was not merely a flight of fancy – indeed, the fusion of environmental factors and football outcomes led us to uncover surprising insights that merit attention. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the curious arsenal of football knowledge provided by My Foot Ball Facts, we set out to unravel the secrets lurking within the nexus of smog and soccer.
As we delved into this intersection, we encountered a range of challenges and technical conundrums, but we were not deterred. Instead, we marched forward, with the spirit of inquiry as our compass and the tenets of scientific rigor as our guide. Our quest was spurred by a mix of curiosity, skepticism, and perhaps a sprinkling of eccentricity, and through it all, we remained steadfast in our determination to extract meaningful insights from this unexpected pairing.
And so, through the following pages, we invite you to embark on a peculiar voyage with us. Prepare to witness the fusion of football fervor and environmental erudition, and be prepared for a study that doesn't just blow the whistle on air pollution but also entices us to ponder the whimsical interplay of seemingly disparate elements. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, for we are about to embark on a journey that promises to score big in the realm of scholarly amusement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

**[[METHODOLOGY]]**

*Sampling Approach*

Our sampling strategy aimed to capture the intertwining dynamics of air pollution and FA Cup final goal differences in Cleveland, Tennessee. We meticulously collected air quality data from the Environmental Protection Agency, focusing on various pollutants such as particulate matter (PM), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), and ozone (O3). As for the football component, we turned to the treasure trove of factual football figures provided by My Foot Ball Facts. The years 1983 to 1997 formed the temporal boundary of our study, a period characterized by a blend of sporting fervor and environmental exhalation.

*Air Quality Variables*

To encapsulate the whimsical dance of air particles and football goals, we delved into the annual measurements of pollutants, employing an eclectic array of statistical tools and models to disentangle the convoluted threads that bind air quality to football outcomes. From the oscillating densities of smog to the undulating tides of football fervor, we navigated the uncharted seas of correlation and causation, propelled by a mix of curiosity, skepticism, and perhaps a sprinkle of eccentricity.

*Football Data Transformation*

Turning our attention to the football facet, we meticulously compiled the goal differences in the FA Cup finals, allowing the numbers to speak volumes about the unexpected interplay between air pollution and sporting showdowns. The amalgamation of numerical prowess and football spectacle enabled us to shed light on the paradoxical connections that may lie beneath the surface of seemingly incongruous elements.

*Statistical Analysis*

With the data at our disposal, we unleashed a barrage of statistical techniques, from regression analyses to mediation models, all in the pursuit of unraveling the intricate web that binds air pollution to the thrill of football competition. We navigated through the maze of coefficients, p-values, and confidence intervals, with a keen eye for patterns that defied the traditional boundaries of academic inquiry. Our unwavering commitment to thoroughness was matched only by our unwarranted enthusiasm for the whimsical fusion of environmental perturbations and football fervor.

*Ethical Considerations*

Throughout the course of our research, ethical principles were upheld with the utmost diligence. We ensured the privacy and confidentiality of all data sources, treating them with the respect befitting their pivotal role in our scholarly escapade. As for the football enthusiasts – their passion for the game served as a beacon, guiding us through the labyrinthine corridors where environmental curiosity intersects with the whimsy of sports.

---
I had great fun composing the methodology section of this quirky research endeavor. If you need more sections or have any specific requests, feel free to ask!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee and FA Cup final goal difference. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and My Foot Ball Facts .

For the time period 1983 to 1997, you found a correlation 0.8119664, r-squared of 0.6592894, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing the Whistle: Exploring the Impacts of Air Pollution on FA Cup Final Goal Difference in Cleveland, Tennessee"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intersection of environmental factors and football outcomes, with a focus on the effects of air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee, on the goal difference in FA Cup finals. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and My Foot Ball Facts, we embarked on a journey to uncover the relationship between smog and soccer. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8119664 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1983 to 1997. Our findings not only shed light on the potential impact of air quality on sports performance, but also highlight the whimsical connections that can emerge when unexpected variables are brought into the mix. So, next time you find yourself pondering the outcome of a football match, be sure to check the local air quality report - because in Cleveland, Tennessee, it may just be a breath of fresh air that determines the score!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of academia often calls for rigorous analysis and precise methodology, but every now and then, it's refreshing to step into uncharted territories and explore the whimsical connections that emerge when unexpected variables are brought into the mix. In this particular study, we ventured into the murky realm where environmental pollution meets the excitement of football, specifically delving into the impact of air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee, on the goal difference in FA Cup finals. As we embarked on this peculiar journey, guided by the wisdom of data and the thrill of discovery, we couldn't help but marvel at the quirkiness of our pursuit.
Our fascination with this topic was not merely a flight of fancy – indeed, the fusion of environmental factors and football outcomes led us to uncover surprising insights that merit attention. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the curious arsenal of football knowledge provided by My Foot Ball Facts, we set out to unravel the secrets lurking within the nexus of smog and soccer.
As we delved into this intersection, we encountered a range of challenges and technical conundrums, but we were not deterred. Instead, we marched forward, with the spirit of inquiry as our compass and the tenets of scientific rigor as our guide. Our quest was spurred by a mix of curiosity, skepticism, and perhaps a sprinkling of eccentricity, and through it all, we remained steadfast in our determination to extract meaningful insights from this unexpected pairing.
And so, through the following pages, we invite you to embark on a peculiar voyage with us. Prepare to witness the fusion of football fervor and environmental erudition, and be prepared for a study that doesn't just blow the whistle on air pollution but also entices us to ponder the whimsical interplay of seemingly disparate elements. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, for we are about to embark on a journey that promises to score big in the realm of scholarly amusement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the interplay between air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee, and FA Cup final goal difference have unfurled a curious tale of unexpected connections and statistical significance. The correlation coefficient of 0.8119664, with an r-squared of 0.6592894 and p < 0.01, underscored a robust and significant relationship between the variables during the years 1983 to 1997. Our findings indicated that as air pollution levels in Cleveland rose or fell, so too did the goal difference in the FA Cup finals, revealing a striking synchrony between these seemingly distinct entities.

Figure 1 (to be inserted) showcases the scatterplot depicting this noteworthy correlation, serving as a visual testament to the substantial relationship uncovered in our analysis. It vividly illustrates the cohesive dance between air pollution and FA Cup final goal difference, providing a tangible representation of the impacts of environmental factors on football outcomes.

In articulating these results, we must acknowledge the whimsical nature of our discovery. Who would have thought that the hazy tendrils of pollution in Cleveland's air would weave a tale of influence over the athletic dynamics of FA Cup finals? Yet, our data speaks for itself, revealing a narrative that blurs the lines between environmental science and sports fervor.

This peculiar alliance between air quality and football serves as a reminder that scholarly exploration can yield unexpected treasures, often lying at the intersection of seemingly unrelated domains. While our findings beckon further research and speculation, they also beckon a moment of lighthearted reflection - after all, who knew that the suspense of a football match could be intertwined with the stench of urban air?

These results not only prompt contemplation about the broader implications of environmental factors on athletic performance but also underscore the delightfully capricious connections that emerge when data leads us down uncharted passages. Our study, though initially poised at the crossroads of incredulity and curiosity, has unfurled a revelation that invites scholars and enthusiasts alike to recognize the unexpected couplings that grace our academic pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee and FA Cup final goal difference. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Blowing the Whistle: Exploring the Impacts of Air Pollution on FA Cup Final Goal Difference in Cleveland, Tennessee"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intersection of environmental factors and football outcomes, with a focus on the effects of air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee, on the goal difference in FA Cup finals. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and My Foot Ball Facts, we embarked on a journey to uncover the relationship between smog and soccer. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8119664 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1983 to 1997. Our findings not only shed light on the potential impact of air quality on sports performance, but also highlight the whimsical connections that can emerge when unexpected variables are brought into the mix. So, next time you find yourself pondering the outcome of a football match, be sure to check the local air quality report - because in Cleveland, Tennessee, it may just be a breath of fresh air that determines the score!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Impact of Air Pollution on Urban Environments" by Smith, the authors find compelling evidence of the detrimental effects of air pollution on human health and environmental quality. The study underscores the urgency of mitigating air pollution through stringent regulations and sustainable urban planning. Similarly, in "Environmental Factors in Sporting Events" by Doe, the authors highlight the importance of considering environmental variables in the context of sports performance, shedding light on the potential influences of weather and air quality on athletic outcomes. Moreover, Jones' research in "The Economic Implications of Environmental Degradation" reaffirms the significant societal and economic costs associated with air pollution, emphasizing the need for comprehensive interventions to address this pressing issue.
Moving beyond the realm of peer-reviewed studies, several non-fiction works such as "The Air We Breathe" by John Green and "Pollution: Past, Present, and Future" by Elizabeth Kolbert offer in-depth insights into the far-reaching consequences of air pollution on human well-being and the natural world. These scholarly publications provide a comprehensive overview of the complex interplay between pollutants and public health, underscoring the gravity of the challenges posed by environmental degradation.
On a lighter note, fictional works such as "The Smog Striker" by J.K. Rowling and "Soccer in the Hazy City" by Dan Brown, while not rooted in empirical research, present imaginative narratives that place air pollution and sports in whimsical contexts. These literary creations offer a departure from the conventional discourse, inviting readers to contemplate the fanciful connections between environmental factors and athletic endeavors.
Widening the scope of our literature review, we ventured into unconventional sources of knowledge, including perusing grocery store receipts, consulting with eccentric weather forecasters, and eavesdropping on heated discussions at local pubs. While these unorthodox methods may raise eyebrows in traditional academic circles, the insights gleaned from these unconventional sources proved to be invaluable in shaping our understanding of the peculiar relationship between air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee, and FA Cup final goal difference.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the interplay between air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee, and FA Cup final goal difference have unfurled a curious tale of unexpected connections and statistical significance. The correlation coefficient of 0.8119664, with an r-squared of 0.6592894 and p < 0.01, underscored a robust and significant relationship between the variables during the years 1983 to 1997. Our findings indicated that as air pollution levels in Cleveland rose or fell, so too did the goal difference in the FA Cup finals, revealing a striking synchrony between these seemingly distinct entities.
Figure 1 (to be inserted) showcases the scatterplot depicting this noteworthy correlation, serving as a visual testament to the substantial relationship uncovered in our analysis. It vividly illustrates the cohesive dance between air pollution and FA Cup final goal difference, providing a tangible representation of the impacts of environmental factors on football outcomes.
In articulating these results, we must acknowledge the whimsical nature of our discovery. Who would have thought that the hazy tendrils of pollution in Cleveland's air would weave a tale of influence over the athletic dynamics of FA Cup finals? Yet, our data speaks for itself, revealing a narrative that blurs the lines between environmental science and sports fervor.
This peculiar alliance between air quality and football serves as a reminder that scholarly exploration can yield unexpected treasures, often lying at the intersection of seemingly unrelated domains. While our findings beckon further research and speculation, they also beckon a moment of lighthearted reflection - after all, who knew that the suspense of a football match could be intertwined with the stench of urban air?
These results not only prompt contemplation about the broader implications of environmental factors on athletic performance but also underscore the delightfully capricious connections that emerge when data leads us down uncharted passages. Our study, though initially poised at the crossroads of incredulity and curiosity, has unfurled a revelation that invites scholars and enthusiasts alike to recognize the unexpected couplings that grace our academic pursuits.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

With our study, we sought to further unpack the enigmatic alliance between air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee and the goal difference in FA Cup finals. As we dive into the discussion of our results, we are reminded of the bizarre yet compelling nature of our findings. In Smith's work, we encountered the impacts of air pollution on human health – and lo and behold, our study corroborates this, offering a whimsical twist by highlighting the potential consequences for football outcomes. It seems that when Cleveland's air quality takes a hit, so does the goal margin in the FA Cup finals, turning the match into a breathless contest indeed.

Furthermore, Doe's research on environmental variables in sporting events has provided a theoretical scaffold for our investigation. Our study's findings align with Doe's perspective, emphasizing the influence of environmental factors on athletic outcomes. While we may have initially approached the inquiry with a hint of levity, the robust statistical relationship we uncovered speaks volumes about the tangible impact of air pollution on the field.

In a departure from conventional academic discourse, let us not overlook the gaming narrative "The Smog Striker" by J.K. Rowling. While a work of fiction, this imaginative tale of football in a polluted urban setting seems eerily prescient now, doesn't it? Much like the fictional counterpart, our study sheds light on the unsuspecting influence that air pollution can exert on sports events. It appears that Cleveland's hazy atmosphere has woven itself into the fabric of football outcomes, asking sports enthusiasts and scholars alike to consider the interplay between the smog and the score.

Moving beyond the boundaries of traditional research, our study has ventured into uncharted territories – both in terms of unconventional sources and unforeseen linkages. While our findings may prompt a more serious inquiry into the implications of air pollution on athletic competitiveness, they also evoke a chuckle or two at the unexpected marriage of urban air quality and football fervor. For now, let's relish in the playful surprise of this discovery, and ponder the whimsical connections that lace our scholarly pursuit. After all, in the game of research, as in football, sometimes it's the unexpected twists that steal the show.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee and FA Cup final goal difference. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing the Whistle: Exploring the Impacts of Air Pollution on FA Cup Final Goal Difference in Cleveland, Tennessee"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intersection of environmental factors and football outcomes, with a focus on the effects of air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee, on the goal difference in FA Cup finals. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and My Foot Ball Facts, we embarked on a journey to uncover the relationship between smog and soccer. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8119664 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1983 to 1997. Our findings not only shed light on the potential impact of air quality on sports performance, but also highlight the whimsical connections that can emerge when unexpected variables are brought into the mix. So, next time you find yourself pondering the outcome of a football match, be sure to check the local air quality report - because in Cleveland, Tennessee, it may just be a breath of fresh air that determines the score!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of academia often calls for rigorous analysis and precise methodology, but every now and then, it's refreshing to step into uncharted territories and explore the whimsical connections that emerge when unexpected variables are brought into the mix. In this particular study, we ventured into the murky realm where environmental pollution meets the excitement of football, specifically delving into the impact of air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee, on the goal difference in FA Cup finals. As we embarked on this peculiar journey, guided by the wisdom of data and the thrill of discovery, we couldn't help but marvel at the quirkiness of our pursuit.
Our fascination with this topic was not merely a flight of fancy – indeed, the fusion of environmental factors and football outcomes led us to uncover surprising insights that merit attention. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the curious arsenal of football knowledge provided by My Foot Ball Facts, we set out to unravel the secrets lurking within the nexus of smog and soccer.
As we delved into this intersection, we encountered a range of challenges and technical conundrums, but we were not deterred. Instead, we marched forward, with the spirit of inquiry as our compass and the tenets of scientific rigor as our guide. Our quest was spurred by a mix of curiosity, skepticism, and perhaps a sprinkling of eccentricity, and through it all, we remained steadfast in our determination to extract meaningful insights from this unexpected pairing.
And so, through the following pages, we invite you to embark on a peculiar voyage with us. Prepare to witness the fusion of football fervor and environmental erudition, and be prepared for a study that doesn't just blow the whistle on air pollution but also entices us to ponder the whimsical interplay of seemingly disparate elements. So, fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, for we are about to embark on a journey that promises to score big in the realm of scholarly amusement.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the interplay between air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee, and FA Cup final goal difference have unfurled a curious tale of unexpected connections and statistical significance. The correlation coefficient of 0.8119664, with an r-squared of 0.6592894 and p < 0.01, underscored a robust and significant relationship between the variables during the years 1983 to 1997. Our findings indicated that as air pollution levels in Cleveland rose or fell, so too did the goal difference in the FA Cup finals, revealing a striking synchrony between these seemingly distinct entities.
Figure 1 (to be inserted) showcases the scatterplot depicting this noteworthy correlation, serving as a visual testament to the substantial relationship uncovered in our analysis. It vividly illustrates the cohesive dance between air pollution and FA Cup final goal difference, providing a tangible representation of the impacts of environmental factors on football outcomes.
In articulating these results, we must acknowledge the whimsical nature of our discovery. Who would have thought that the hazy tendrils of pollution in Cleveland's air would weave a tale of influence over the athletic dynamics of FA Cup finals? Yet, our data speaks for itself, revealing a narrative that blurs the lines between environmental science and sports fervor.
This peculiar alliance between air quality and football serves as a reminder that scholarly exploration can yield unexpected treasures, often lying at the intersection of seemingly unrelated domains. While our findings beckon further research and speculation, they also beckon a moment of lighthearted reflection - after all, who knew that the suspense of a football match could be intertwined with the stench of urban air?
These results not only prompt contemplation about the broader implications of environmental factors on athletic performance but also underscore the delightfully capricious connections that emerge when data leads us down uncharted passages. Our study, though initially poised at the crossroads of incredulity and curiosity, has unfurled a revelation that invites scholars and enthusiasts alike to recognize the unexpected couplings that grace our academic pursuits.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has highlighted the fascinating link between air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee, and the goal difference in FA Cup finals. Our findings illuminated a significant correlation, showing that the highs and lows of air quality mirrored the thrilling victories and agonizing defeats on the football pitch. The unexpected alchemy of smog and soccer has left us pondering the whimsical intricacies of the world around us. Amidst the pursuit of scholarly pursuits, we have unearthed a delightful reminder that serendipitous connections can emerge when we explore the uncharted territories of interdisciplinary study. Indeed, the air in Cleveland may have a direct stake in the drama of the beautiful game, and as we contemplate this unexpected marriage of environmental factors and sports outcomes, we are reminded that scholarly pursuits can hold within them a touch of the absurd and the unexpected. So, as we bid adieu to this peculiar odyssey, let us cherish the delightful oddities that emerge when we dare to unravel the mysteries that lie at the quirkiest intersections. In light of these revelatory findings, we assert with confidence and a touch of whimsy – no more research is needed in this area. After all, who needs another breath of fresh air when the current one is so delightfully unexpected?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Blowing the Whistle: Exploring the Impacts of Air Pollution on FA Cup Final Goal Difference in Cleveland, Tennessee. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Environmental Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Blowing the Whistle: Exploring the Impacts of Air Pollution on FA Cup Final Goal Difference in Cleveland, Tennessee. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Environmental Studies and Sports Analytics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Blowing the Whistle: Exploring the Impacts of Air Pollution on FA Cup Final Goal Difference in Cleveland, Tennessee with an abstract of In this study, we delved into the intersection of environmental factors and football outcomes, with a focus on the effects of air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee, on the goal difference in FA Cup finals. Armed with data from the Environmental Protection Agency and My Foot Ball Facts, we embarked on a journey to uncover the relationship between smog and soccer. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8119664 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1983 to 1997. Our findings not only shed light on the potential impact of air quality on sports performance, but also highlight the whimsical connections that can emerge when unexpected variables are brought into the mix. So, next time you find yourself pondering the outcome of a football match, be sure to check the local air quality report - because in Cleveland, Tennessee, it may just be a breath of fresh air that determines the score!

ChatGPT:

air pollution, FA Cup final, Cleveland Tennessee, environmental factors, football outcomes, goal difference, correlation coefficient, air quality, sports performance

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Cleveland, TN
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee

FA Cup final goal difference
Source: My Foot Ball Facts
See what else correlates with FA Cup final goal difference

Correlation r = 0.8119664 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6592894 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 65.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., FA Cup final goal difference) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee) over the 15 years from 1983 through 1997.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00024. 0.0002363818733805195200000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.81 in 0.024% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 4,230 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.51, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997
Air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee (Bad air quality days)0.01673640.01162790.003690040.0028248600000000.00821918000.00826446
FA Cup final goal difference (Goal difference)421211111214112




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.0167364,0.0116279,0.00369004,0.00282486,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.00821918,0,0,0.00826446,])
array_2 = np.array([4,2,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,2,1,4,1,1,2,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee"
array_2_name = "FA Cup final goal difference"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 3983 · Black Variable ID: 21644 · Red Variable ID: 100
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0