Report an error
FA Cup final goal difference correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Mega millions lottery numbers | r=0.83 | 20yrs | No |
Air pollution in Cleveland, Tennessee | r=0.81 | 15yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'black hole photo' | r=0.79 | 13yrs | Yes! |
The number of food and tobacco roasting, baking, and drying machine operators and tenders in South Carolina | r=0.77 | 17yrs | Yes! |
Mega millions lottery numbers | r=0.72 | 20yrs | No |
Hot days in Paris | r=0.71 | 10yrs | No |
Google searches for 'funny cat videos' | r=0.69 | 18yrs | No |
Google searches for 'cat memes' | r=0.6 | 18yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and the Sun | r=0.27 | 47yrs | No |
FA Cup final goal difference also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)