about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,972 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Rylee and the second variable is GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As the number of parents naming their children Rylee rose, so did the demand for products with unique spellings, leading to an increased need for alternative ingredients like GMO soybeans in South Dakota. This in turn drove farmers to ramp up their GMO soybean production to keep up with the Rylee-related demand for unconventional snacks and drinks. Who knew that a popular name could have such a soy-ful impact on agriculture!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a South Dakota field filled with lush, vibrant green soybean plants, stretching endlessly into the horizon. Among them, a group of genetically modified soybeans stand out with plumper pods and lusher leaves, radiating a noticeable aura. In the nearby town, a cluster of smiling babies named Rylee play joyfully in a park, basking in their fame and attention. The scene should exude a pop art style, capturing the unique personalities of both the soybeans and the Rylees as they each seek to make their mark in the world. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Rylee and GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Hyper-realistic a meme Parallax art Charcoal Pop art
ChatGPT: Pop art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Rylee and GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota, in the following situation: Because as more people named Rylee gained attention, soybeans in South Dakota started feeling the pressure to live up to the hype. The soybeans, wanting to be popular too, requested GMO modifications to bulk up and make a name for themselves in the agricultural world. They didn't want to be overshadowed by the Rylees of the human world, so they went all out to become the trendiest legume on the block. The Rylee effect was real, and these soybeans were not about to miss out on their 15 minutes of fame!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a South Dakota field, a sea of vibrant green soybean plants stretches towards the horizon. Among them, a group of soybeans stand out with their plumper pods and lusher leaves, proudly displaying the effects of GMO modifications. Meanwhile, in the nearby town, a cluster of smiling babies all named Rylee play in the park, basking in the attention and popularity their name has garnered. The soybeans and the Rylees both exude an aura of newfound fame, each wanting to make a mark in their own unique way.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Pop art ] and depicting this scene: In a South Dakota field, a sea of vibrant green soybean plants stretches towards the horizon. Among them, a group of soybeans stand out with their plumper pods and lusher leaves, proudly displaying the effects of GMO modifications. Meanwhile, in the nearby town, a cluster of smiling babies all named Rylee play in the park, basking in the attention and popularity their name has garnered. The soybeans and the Rylees both exude an aura of newfound fame, each wanting to make a mark in their own unique way. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a South Dakota field filled with lush, vibrant green soybean plants, stretching endlessly into the horizon. Among them, a group of genetically modified soybeans stand out with plumper pods and lusher leaves, radiating a noticeable aura. In the nearby town, a cluster of smiling babies named Rylee play joyfully in a park, basking in their fame and attention. The scene should exude a pop art style, capturing the unique personalities of both the soybeans and the Rylees as they each seek to make their mark in the world.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Rylee caused GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
GMOybeans: A Soy-Cial Study on the Rylee-iance of Names

Journal of Genetically Modified Organismology

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rylee and GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and USDA to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9143468 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"GMOybeans: A Soy-Cial Study on the Rylee-iance of Names"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we sought to uncover the connection between the popularity of the first name Rylee and the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in the state of South Dakota. While the topic might initially seem as unrelated as a soybean in a fruit salad, our findings revealed a surprising correlation that might make you say, "Soy amazing!" Our research team not only delved into the fascinating world of agricultural biotechnology but also dared to explore the whimsical realm of baby naming trends.

Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the United States Department of Agriculture, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the years 2000 to 2022. Our statistical analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9143468 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between the rise of Rylee as a popular first name and the increased use of GMO soybeans in the region.

As we unearthed this intriguing correlation, we couldn't help but marvel at the "soy-nergetic" personality of Rylee, much like the resilient soybeans thriving in South Dakota. Our findings invite further exploration into the interplay of agricultural practices and societal trends, proving that research can indeed be both "seedy" and "punny" at the same time.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the unforeseen relationship between a name's popularity and the adoption of genetically modified soybeans, demonstrating that the intertwining branches of agriculture and nomenclature can yield unexpected connections. We hope this research will inspire others to dig deeper into seemingly unrelated subjects and unveil the hidden "soy-crets" of our world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rylee and GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"GMOybeans: A Soy-Cial Study on the Rylee-iance of Names"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we sought to uncover the connection between the popularity of the first name Rylee and the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in the state of South Dakota. While the topic might initially seem as unrelated as a soybean in a fruit salad, our findings revealed a surprising correlation that might make you say, "Soy amazing!" Our research team not only delved into the fascinating world of agricultural biotechnology but also dared to explore the whimsical realm of baby naming trends.

Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the United States Department of Agriculture, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the years 2000 to 2022. Our statistical analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9143468 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between the rise of Rylee as a popular first name and the increased use of GMO soybeans in the region.

As we unearthed this intriguing correlation, we couldn't help but marvel at the "soy-nergetic" personality of Rylee, much like the resilient soybeans thriving in South Dakota. Our findings invite further exploration into the interplay of agricultural practices and societal trends, proving that research can indeed be both "seedy" and "punny" at the same time.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the unforeseen relationship between a name's popularity and the adoption of genetically modified soybeans, demonstrating that the intertwining branches of agriculture and nomenclature can yield unexpected connections. We hope this research will inspire others to dig deeper into seemingly unrelated subjects and unveil the hidden "soy-crets" of our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The debate surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been anything but genetically quiet – it’s been more like gene-rously loud! In the midst of this GMO thunderstorm, our study focuses on a rather unexpected ray of light – the influence of the first name Rylee on the prevalence of genetically modified soybeans in South Dakota. Now, if you think this sounds unusual, just wait until you hear the "soy-nam-bulist" associations we uncovered!

The choice of a name is a momentous decision for parents, as they bestow upon their child the moniker that will shape their identity. Similarly, farmers in South Dakota make significant decisions regarding their agricultural practices, including the adoption of GMO soybeans. As we delved into these two seemingly disparate realms, we couldn't help but wonder: is there a "soy-mantic" connection between the popularity of the name Rylee and the cultivation of GMO soybeans?

Now, before we dive into our findings, let us "plant" a quick dad joke here for good measure: Why did the soybean go to the doctor? Because it had eda-mame issues! It's important to sprinkle some humor into our scholarly endeavors, right?

As we wade through the soybean fields of research, it becomes abundantly clear that understanding the dynamics of agricultural innovation and societal influences requires a holistic approach. We envision this study as a "soy-entific" expedition into uncharted territory, where the soil is rich with data and the crop of knowledge is ripe for harvesting.

Before we proceed, another dad joke to keep the scholarly mood light: What do you call a soybean that commits a crime? A "soy-criminal"! It's important to keep our sense of humor intact as we journey through the sometimes arid lands of academic inquiry.

Our study sets out to not only investigate the statistical relationship between the rise of Rylee as a popular first name and the surge in GMO soybean cultivation but also to spark curiosity about the "soy-ful" mysteries of interconnected human and agricultural behaviors. As we embark on this "soy-cial" inquiry, we invite our readers to join us in unraveling the enigma of Rylee and GMO soybeans.

With that, let’s hop on the combine harvester of knowledge and traverse the "soy-lful" fields of data and discovery to discern the soy-cial implications of our findings. It’s time to shed light on the "soy-seed" secrets of nomenclature and agriculture!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rylee and GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"GMOybeans: A Soy-Cial Study on the Rylee-iance of Names"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we sought to uncover the connection between the popularity of the first name Rylee and the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in the state of South Dakota. While the topic might initially seem as unrelated as a soybean in a fruit salad, our findings revealed a surprising correlation that might make you say, "Soy amazing!" Our research team not only delved into the fascinating world of agricultural biotechnology but also dared to explore the whimsical realm of baby naming trends.

Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the United States Department of Agriculture, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the years 2000 to 2022. Our statistical analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9143468 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between the rise of Rylee as a popular first name and the increased use of GMO soybeans in the region.

As we unearthed this intriguing correlation, we couldn't help but marvel at the "soy-nergetic" personality of Rylee, much like the resilient soybeans thriving in South Dakota. Our findings invite further exploration into the interplay of agricultural practices and societal trends, proving that research can indeed be both "seedy" and "punny" at the same time.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the unforeseen relationship between a name's popularity and the adoption of genetically modified soybeans, demonstrating that the intertwining branches of agriculture and nomenclature can yield unexpected connections. We hope this research will inspire others to dig deeper into seemingly unrelated subjects and unveil the hidden "soy-crets" of our world.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The debate surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been anything but genetically quiet – it’s been more like gene-rously loud! In the midst of this GMO thunderstorm, our study focuses on a rather unexpected ray of light – the influence of the first name Rylee on the prevalence of genetically modified soybeans in South Dakota. Now, if you think this sounds unusual, just wait until you hear the "soy-nam-bulist" associations we uncovered!
The choice of a name is a momentous decision for parents, as they bestow upon their child the moniker that will shape their identity. Similarly, farmers in South Dakota make significant decisions regarding their agricultural practices, including the adoption of GMO soybeans. As we delved into these two seemingly disparate realms, we couldn't help but wonder: is there a "soy-mantic" connection between the popularity of the name Rylee and the cultivation of GMO soybeans?
Now, before we dive into our findings, let us "plant" a quick dad joke here for good measure: Why did the soybean go to the doctor? Because it had eda-mame issues! It's important to sprinkle some humor into our scholarly endeavors, right?
As we wade through the soybean fields of research, it becomes abundantly clear that understanding the dynamics of agricultural innovation and societal influences requires a holistic approach. We envision this study as a "soy-entific" expedition into uncharted territory, where the soil is rich with data and the crop of knowledge is ripe for harvesting.
Before we proceed, another dad joke to keep the scholarly mood light: What do you call a soybean that commits a crime? A "soy-criminal"! It's important to keep our sense of humor intact as we journey through the sometimes arid lands of academic inquiry.
Our study sets out to not only investigate the statistical relationship between the rise of Rylee as a popular first name and the surge in GMO soybean cultivation but also to spark curiosity about the "soy-ful" mysteries of interconnected human and agricultural behaviors. As we embark on this "soy-cial" inquiry, we invite our readers to join us in unraveling the enigma of Rylee and GMO soybeans.
With that, let’s hop on the combine harvester of knowledge and traverse the "soy-lful" fields of data and discovery to discern the soy-cial implications of our findings. It’s time to shed light on the "soy-seed" secrets of nomenclature and agriculture!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The study of the connection between the popularity of the first name Rylee and the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in South Dakota has garnered attention from researchers across diverse fields, expanding the horizons of inquiry like a really expansive soybean field. Smith et al. (2015) delved into the societal implications of baby naming trends, while Doe and Jones (2018) explored the agricultural landscape of GMO soybean cultivation. These serious investigations set the stage for our own soy-ful journey of discovery.

In "The Soybean Chronicles: A Tale of Agricultural Innovation," the authors discuss the evolution of soybean cultivation, uncovering the transformations brought about by biotechnological advancements. Meanwhile, "The Name Game: A Sociological Analysis of Baby Naming Trends" offers a deep dive into the cultural significance of names, shedding light on the nuanced factors that influence naming decisions.

Now, enough with the serious scholarly musings. Let's add some spice to this literature review by planting a dad joke: Why did the soybean break up with the lentil? It just wasn't their "seeds-on"! Oh, soy haven't heard a seed-related joke before? Don't worry, I've "bean" saving them up for this very occasion.

Moving on to more unconventional sources, "The Adventures of Rylee and the Beanstalk" might seem like a work of fiction, but it offers surprising insights into the esoteric connections between plant biology and human nomenclature. Then there's "GMO Wars: The Soy Awakens," a sci-fi novel that presents a dystopian world where genetically modified soybeans reign supreme. You might think these references are as tangential as an edamame bean in a fruit salad, but the soy-themed literature has more relevance than meets the eye.

Let's not forget about the enlightening board game "Agricola: Farmer's Name Edition," where players must strategically name their farm animals and crops, inadvertently exploring the subconscious influences of nomenclature on agricultural decisions. And for a lighthearted take on agricultural innovation, "Catan: The Soybean Expansion" introduces a playful twist to the world of soybean trading, prompting players to contemplate the societal impact of soy-related commerce.

But wait, here's another chance to unleash a soy-infused dad joke: What did the soybean say to the tomato? "You're looking soy good!" With this much soy-based humor, this literature review is as fertile as a well-tended soybean field.

In our quest to explore the "soy-crets" of baby naming and agricultural trends, we aim to strike the perfect balance between scholarly rigor and the whimsical charm of agricultural wordplay. As we traverse the uncharted terrain of agricultural biotechnology and sociolinguistics, our findings will reflect the soy-ful interplay of human behavior and agricultural practices. So, get ready to savor the "soy-nomenal" blend of scholarly inquiry and pun-tastic amusement!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rylee and GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and USDA . You used data from 2000 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"GMOybeans: A Soy-Cial Study on the Rylee-iance of Names"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we sought to uncover the connection between the popularity of the first name Rylee and the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in the state of South Dakota. While the topic might initially seem as unrelated as a soybean in a fruit salad, our findings revealed a surprising correlation that might make you say, "Soy amazing!" Our research team not only delved into the fascinating world of agricultural biotechnology but also dared to explore the whimsical realm of baby naming trends.

Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the United States Department of Agriculture, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the years 2000 to 2022. Our statistical analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9143468 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between the rise of Rylee as a popular first name and the increased use of GMO soybeans in the region.

As we unearthed this intriguing correlation, we couldn't help but marvel at the "soy-nergetic" personality of Rylee, much like the resilient soybeans thriving in South Dakota. Our findings invite further exploration into the interplay of agricultural practices and societal trends, proving that research can indeed be both "seedy" and "punny" at the same time.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the unforeseen relationship between a name's popularity and the adoption of genetically modified soybeans, demonstrating that the intertwining branches of agriculture and nomenclature can yield unexpected connections. We hope this research will inspire others to dig deeper into seemingly unrelated subjects and unveil the hidden "soy-crets" of our world.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The debate surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been anything but genetically quiet – it’s been more like gene-rously loud! In the midst of this GMO thunderstorm, our study focuses on a rather unexpected ray of light – the influence of the first name Rylee on the prevalence of genetically modified soybeans in South Dakota. Now, if you think this sounds unusual, just wait until you hear the "soy-nam-bulist" associations we uncovered!
The choice of a name is a momentous decision for parents, as they bestow upon their child the moniker that will shape their identity. Similarly, farmers in South Dakota make significant decisions regarding their agricultural practices, including the adoption of GMO soybeans. As we delved into these two seemingly disparate realms, we couldn't help but wonder: is there a "soy-mantic" connection between the popularity of the name Rylee and the cultivation of GMO soybeans?
Now, before we dive into our findings, let us "plant" a quick dad joke here for good measure: Why did the soybean go to the doctor? Because it had eda-mame issues! It's important to sprinkle some humor into our scholarly endeavors, right?
As we wade through the soybean fields of research, it becomes abundantly clear that understanding the dynamics of agricultural innovation and societal influences requires a holistic approach. We envision this study as a "soy-entific" expedition into uncharted territory, where the soil is rich with data and the crop of knowledge is ripe for harvesting.
Before we proceed, another dad joke to keep the scholarly mood light: What do you call a soybean that commits a crime? A "soy-criminal"! It's important to keep our sense of humor intact as we journey through the sometimes arid lands of academic inquiry.
Our study sets out to not only investigate the statistical relationship between the rise of Rylee as a popular first name and the surge in GMO soybean cultivation but also to spark curiosity about the "soy-ful" mysteries of interconnected human and agricultural behaviors. As we embark on this "soy-cial" inquiry, we invite our readers to join us in unraveling the enigma of Rylee and GMO soybeans.
With that, let’s hop on the combine harvester of knowledge and traverse the "soy-lful" fields of data and discovery to discern the soy-cial implications of our findings. It’s time to shed light on the "soy-seed" secrets of nomenclature and agriculture!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Now, onto the nitty-gritty details of our "soy-entific" expedition! In order to unravel the mysterious connection between the prevalence of the first name Rylee and the adoption of genetically modified soybeans in South Dakota, we employed a combination of data mining, statistical analysis, and a sprinkle of "soy-sational" curiosity.

Firstly, we obtained data on the popularity of the name Rylee from the US Social Security Administration, which provided us with the frequency of this "soy-terious" moniker from 2000 to 2022. This data formed the foundational soil in which we planted the seeds of our investigation, allowing us to track the growth of Rylee as a name amidst the vast "soy-litude" of human nomenclature.

Next, we delved into the agricultural landscape of South Dakota, where the cultivation of soybeans reaches a "soy-endipitous" intersection with our study. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) graciously provided us with intricate details of soybean farming practices, including the adoption of GMO soybeans, ensuring that we sowed our research on solid and "soy-lid" ground.

Once we had gathered our "soy-tastic" datasets, we embarked on a statistical analysis that could rival the genetic complexity of soybean traits. We utilized a correlation analysis to unveil the potential relationship between the popularity of the name Rylee and the use of GMO soybeans, akin to exploring the genetic interplay within a "soy-teotypical" soybean seed.

In addition to correlation analysis, we employed a regression model to further examine the influence of various factors such as time trends and demographic shifts on the dynamics of Rylee's popularity and the prevalence of GMO soybeans. Our regression analysis sought to peel back the layers of this "soy-lective" process, uncovering the potential drivers of the intertwined growth patterns.

Now, here's a dad joke to "soy-ten" up the methodological musings: Why don't soybeans ever get into arguments? Because they like to "soy-el" their differences! It's crucial to infuse some levity into our scholarly endeavors, especially when scrutinizing the "soy-crets" of societal and agricultural connections.

Lastly, we explored spatial and temporal patterns through a geographic information system (GIS) analysis, allowing us to visualize the "soy-scape" of Rylee's ascendance and the "soy-rganic" spread of GMO soybean fields across South Dakota. This mapping approach offered us a "soy-ber" perspective on the geographical nuances of our research landscape, adding a flavorful dimension to our analysis.

With these "soy-phisticated" research methods in place, we meticulously tilled through the data fields, separating the "soy-nificant" findings from the statistical chaff. Our approach aimed to cultivate a deeper understanding of the intertwined growth patterns of Rylee's popularity and the proliferation of GMO soybeans, enriching the scholarly harvest with unexpected "soy-prises" along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rylee and GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and USDA .

For the time period 2000 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9143468, r-squared of 0.8360302, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"GMOybeans: A Soy-Cial Study on the Rylee-iance of Names"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we sought to uncover the connection between the popularity of the first name Rylee and the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in the state of South Dakota. While the topic might initially seem as unrelated as a soybean in a fruit salad, our findings revealed a surprising correlation that might make you say, "Soy amazing!" Our research team not only delved into the fascinating world of agricultural biotechnology but also dared to explore the whimsical realm of baby naming trends.

Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the United States Department of Agriculture, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the years 2000 to 2022. Our statistical analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9143468 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between the rise of Rylee as a popular first name and the increased use of GMO soybeans in the region.

As we unearthed this intriguing correlation, we couldn't help but marvel at the "soy-nergetic" personality of Rylee, much like the resilient soybeans thriving in South Dakota. Our findings invite further exploration into the interplay of agricultural practices and societal trends, proving that research can indeed be both "seedy" and "punny" at the same time.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the unforeseen relationship between a name's popularity and the adoption of genetically modified soybeans, demonstrating that the intertwining branches of agriculture and nomenclature can yield unexpected connections. We hope this research will inspire others to dig deeper into seemingly unrelated subjects and unveil the hidden "soy-crets" of our world.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The debate surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been anything but genetically quiet – it’s been more like gene-rously loud! In the midst of this GMO thunderstorm, our study focuses on a rather unexpected ray of light – the influence of the first name Rylee on the prevalence of genetically modified soybeans in South Dakota. Now, if you think this sounds unusual, just wait until you hear the "soy-nam-bulist" associations we uncovered!
The choice of a name is a momentous decision for parents, as they bestow upon their child the moniker that will shape their identity. Similarly, farmers in South Dakota make significant decisions regarding their agricultural practices, including the adoption of GMO soybeans. As we delved into these two seemingly disparate realms, we couldn't help but wonder: is there a "soy-mantic" connection between the popularity of the name Rylee and the cultivation of GMO soybeans?
Now, before we dive into our findings, let us "plant" a quick dad joke here for good measure: Why did the soybean go to the doctor? Because it had eda-mame issues! It's important to sprinkle some humor into our scholarly endeavors, right?
As we wade through the soybean fields of research, it becomes abundantly clear that understanding the dynamics of agricultural innovation and societal influences requires a holistic approach. We envision this study as a "soy-entific" expedition into uncharted territory, where the soil is rich with data and the crop of knowledge is ripe for harvesting.
Before we proceed, another dad joke to keep the scholarly mood light: What do you call a soybean that commits a crime? A "soy-criminal"! It's important to keep our sense of humor intact as we journey through the sometimes arid lands of academic inquiry.
Our study sets out to not only investigate the statistical relationship between the rise of Rylee as a popular first name and the surge in GMO soybean cultivation but also to spark curiosity about the "soy-ful" mysteries of interconnected human and agricultural behaviors. As we embark on this "soy-cial" inquiry, we invite our readers to join us in unraveling the enigma of Rylee and GMO soybeans.
With that, let’s hop on the combine harvester of knowledge and traverse the "soy-lful" fields of data and discovery to discern the soy-cial implications of our findings. It’s time to shed light on the "soy-seed" secrets of nomenclature and agriculture!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the United States Department of Agriculture for the years 2000 to 2022 yielded some intriguing results that will surely make you exclaim, "Soy incredible!"

First, we found a strong positive correlation between the popularity of the first name Rylee and the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean cultivation in South Dakota. The correlation coefficient of 0.9143468 indicates a robust relationship, prompting us to declare, "Rylee is truly soy-perpopular!"

Fig. 1 shows a scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between Rylee's growing popularity as a first name and the escalating use of GMO soybeans in South Dakota. We must admit, it's quite a sight to behold – just like witnessing a robust soybean plant flourishing in the heart of a bustling city!

And now, a quick soybean-themed dad joke to keep the scholarly atmosphere light: Why do soybeans make great secret agents? Because they are experts at going undercover! It's important to sprinkle some humor into our findings, right?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rylee and GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"GMOybeans: A Soy-Cial Study on the Rylee-iance of Names"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we sought to uncover the connection between the popularity of the first name Rylee and the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in the state of South Dakota. While the topic might initially seem as unrelated as a soybean in a fruit salad, our findings revealed a surprising correlation that might make you say, "Soy amazing!" Our research team not only delved into the fascinating world of agricultural biotechnology but also dared to explore the whimsical realm of baby naming trends.

Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the United States Department of Agriculture, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the years 2000 to 2022. Our statistical analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9143468 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between the rise of Rylee as a popular first name and the increased use of GMO soybeans in the region.

As we unearthed this intriguing correlation, we couldn't help but marvel at the "soy-nergetic" personality of Rylee, much like the resilient soybeans thriving in South Dakota. Our findings invite further exploration into the interplay of agricultural practices and societal trends, proving that research can indeed be both "seedy" and "punny" at the same time.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the unforeseen relationship between a name's popularity and the adoption of genetically modified soybeans, demonstrating that the intertwining branches of agriculture and nomenclature can yield unexpected connections. We hope this research will inspire others to dig deeper into seemingly unrelated subjects and unveil the hidden "soy-crets" of our world.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The study of the connection between the popularity of the first name Rylee and the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in South Dakota has garnered attention from researchers across diverse fields, expanding the horizons of inquiry like a really expansive soybean field. Smith et al. (2015) delved into the societal implications of baby naming trends, while Doe and Jones (2018) explored the agricultural landscape of GMO soybean cultivation. These serious investigations set the stage for our own soy-ful journey of discovery.
In "The Soybean Chronicles: A Tale of Agricultural Innovation," the authors discuss the evolution of soybean cultivation, uncovering the transformations brought about by biotechnological advancements. Meanwhile, "The Name Game: A Sociological Analysis of Baby Naming Trends" offers a deep dive into the cultural significance of names, shedding light on the nuanced factors that influence naming decisions.
Now, enough with the serious scholarly musings. Let's add some spice to this literature review by planting a dad joke: Why did the soybean break up with the lentil? It just wasn't their "seeds-on"! Oh, soy haven't heard a seed-related joke before? Don't worry, I've "bean" saving them up for this very occasion.
Moving on to more unconventional sources, "The Adventures of Rylee and the Beanstalk" might seem like a work of fiction, but it offers surprising insights into the esoteric connections between plant biology and human nomenclature. Then there's "GMO Wars: The Soy Awakens," a sci-fi novel that presents a dystopian world where genetically modified soybeans reign supreme. You might think these references are as tangential as an edamame bean in a fruit salad, but the soy-themed literature has more relevance than meets the eye.
Let's not forget about the enlightening board game "Agricola: Farmer's Name Edition," where players must strategically name their farm animals and crops, inadvertently exploring the subconscious influences of nomenclature on agricultural decisions. And for a lighthearted take on agricultural innovation, "Catan: The Soybean Expansion" introduces a playful twist to the world of soybean trading, prompting players to contemplate the societal impact of soy-related commerce.
But wait, here's another chance to unleash a soy-infused dad joke: What did the soybean say to the tomato? "You're looking soy good!" With this much soy-based humor, this literature review is as fertile as a well-tended soybean field.
In our quest to explore the "soy-crets" of baby naming and agricultural trends, we aim to strike the perfect balance between scholarly rigor and the whimsical charm of agricultural wordplay. As we traverse the uncharted terrain of agricultural biotechnology and sociolinguistics, our findings will reflect the soy-ful interplay of human behavior and agricultural practices. So, get ready to savor the "soy-nomenal" blend of scholarly inquiry and pun-tastic amusement!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the United States Department of Agriculture for the years 2000 to 2022 yielded some intriguing results that will surely make you exclaim, "Soy incredible!"
First, we found a strong positive correlation between the popularity of the first name Rylee and the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean cultivation in South Dakota. The correlation coefficient of 0.9143468 indicates a robust relationship, prompting us to declare, "Rylee is truly soy-perpopular!"
Fig. 1 shows a scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between Rylee's growing popularity as a first name and the escalating use of GMO soybeans in South Dakota. We must admit, it's quite a sight to behold – just like witnessing a robust soybean plant flourishing in the heart of a bustling city!
And now, a quick soybean-themed dad joke to keep the scholarly atmosphere light: Why do soybeans make great secret agents? Because they are experts at going undercover! It's important to sprinkle some humor into our findings, right?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have uncovered a curious and, dare I say, "edamamezing" relationship between the popularity of the first name Rylee and the prevalence of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the soybean fields of South Dakota. Results not only supported but also "soy-couraged" the prior research exploring the interconnected realms of naming trends and agricultural practices. It's truly a testament to the soy-namic nature of our world, where the roots of societal trends and agricultural decisions intertwine in unexpected ways.

The significant correlation coefficient of 0.9143468 we observed reinforces the soy-lidity of the connection between the rise of Rylee as a popular first name and the increased use of GMO soybeans in South Dakota. As we reflect on these results, it becomes clear that the blossoming popularity of Rylee mirrors the resilience and adaptability of the soybeans thriving in the local agricultural landscape. It's as if Rylee is the embodiment of the "soy-cool" spirit that characterizes the robust soybean crops!

On the soy-mewhat lighter side, let's plant a quick dad joke amidst our serious discussion: Why did the soybean bring a flashlight to the party? Because it wanted to become the light "soy-ce"! It's crucial to maintain a "soy-sense" of humor amid scholarly discourse, don't you think?

These findings add a new layer of depth to the existing literature, creating a "soy-lectable" blend of sociolinguistics and agricultural biotechnology. As we embrace the "soy-nfusing" yet fascinating connections between human naming traditions and agricultural innovations, we are reminded that research can indeed be as lighthearted and enigmatic as a soybean-themed pun.

In the next section, we'll delve even deeper into the soy-rich world of agricultural practices, teasing out further implications and cultivating a newfound appreciation for the "Rylee-iance" of names in the realm of GMO soybean cultivation in South Dakota. So prepare to embark on a soy-tastically entertaining and soy-nificant scholarly journey!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rylee and GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"GMOybeans: A Soy-Cial Study on the Rylee-iance of Names"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we sought to uncover the connection between the popularity of the first name Rylee and the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in the state of South Dakota. While the topic might initially seem as unrelated as a soybean in a fruit salad, our findings revealed a surprising correlation that might make you say, "Soy amazing!" Our research team not only delved into the fascinating world of agricultural biotechnology but also dared to explore the whimsical realm of baby naming trends.

Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the United States Department of Agriculture, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the years 2000 to 2022. Our statistical analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9143468 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between the rise of Rylee as a popular first name and the increased use of GMO soybeans in the region.

As we unearthed this intriguing correlation, we couldn't help but marvel at the "soy-nergetic" personality of Rylee, much like the resilient soybeans thriving in South Dakota. Our findings invite further exploration into the interplay of agricultural practices and societal trends, proving that research can indeed be both "seedy" and "punny" at the same time.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the unforeseen relationship between a name's popularity and the adoption of genetically modified soybeans, demonstrating that the intertwining branches of agriculture and nomenclature can yield unexpected connections. We hope this research will inspire others to dig deeper into seemingly unrelated subjects and unveil the hidden "soy-crets" of our world.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The debate surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been anything but genetically quiet – it’s been more like gene-rously loud! In the midst of this GMO thunderstorm, our study focuses on a rather unexpected ray of light – the influence of the first name Rylee on the prevalence of genetically modified soybeans in South Dakota. Now, if you think this sounds unusual, just wait until you hear the "soy-nam-bulist" associations we uncovered!
The choice of a name is a momentous decision for parents, as they bestow upon their child the moniker that will shape their identity. Similarly, farmers in South Dakota make significant decisions regarding their agricultural practices, including the adoption of GMO soybeans. As we delved into these two seemingly disparate realms, we couldn't help but wonder: is there a "soy-mantic" connection between the popularity of the name Rylee and the cultivation of GMO soybeans?
Now, before we dive into our findings, let us "plant" a quick dad joke here for good measure: Why did the soybean go to the doctor? Because it had eda-mame issues! It's important to sprinkle some humor into our scholarly endeavors, right?
As we wade through the soybean fields of research, it becomes abundantly clear that understanding the dynamics of agricultural innovation and societal influences requires a holistic approach. We envision this study as a "soy-entific" expedition into uncharted territory, where the soil is rich with data and the crop of knowledge is ripe for harvesting.
Before we proceed, another dad joke to keep the scholarly mood light: What do you call a soybean that commits a crime? A "soy-criminal"! It's important to keep our sense of humor intact as we journey through the sometimes arid lands of academic inquiry.
Our study sets out to not only investigate the statistical relationship between the rise of Rylee as a popular first name and the surge in GMO soybean cultivation but also to spark curiosity about the "soy-ful" mysteries of interconnected human and agricultural behaviors. As we embark on this "soy-cial" inquiry, we invite our readers to join us in unraveling the enigma of Rylee and GMO soybeans.
With that, let’s hop on the combine harvester of knowledge and traverse the "soy-lful" fields of data and discovery to discern the soy-cial implications of our findings. It’s time to shed light on the "soy-seed" secrets of nomenclature and agriculture!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the United States Department of Agriculture for the years 2000 to 2022 yielded some intriguing results that will surely make you exclaim, "Soy incredible!"
First, we found a strong positive correlation between the popularity of the first name Rylee and the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybean cultivation in South Dakota. The correlation coefficient of 0.9143468 indicates a robust relationship, prompting us to declare, "Rylee is truly soy-perpopular!"
Fig. 1 shows a scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between Rylee's growing popularity as a first name and the escalating use of GMO soybeans in South Dakota. We must admit, it's quite a sight to behold – just like witnessing a robust soybean plant flourishing in the heart of a bustling city!
And now, a quick soybean-themed dad joke to keep the scholarly atmosphere light: Why do soybeans make great secret agents? Because they are experts at going undercover! It's important to sprinkle some humor into our findings, right?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

Our study has unveiled an unexpected yet compelling relationship between the prevalence of the first name Rylee and the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in South Dakota's soybean cultivation. It appears that Rylee's popularity has indeed bean-efited from the increased use of GMO soybeans, as indicated by the remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9143468. If you find this correlation surprising, then you're definitely not the only one – we were soy-prised too!

This revelation not only adds a quirky twist to the ongoing discourse surrounding GMOs but also highlights the intertwined nature of seemingly unrelated domains. It's like discovering that soybeans and Rylee have been sharing a secret handshake all along – "soy nice to meet you, Rylee!"

In the spirit of scholarly camaraderie, here's a soybean-themed dad joke to round off our conclusions: Why don't soybeans ever get into arguments? Because they always bring a "tofu" peace offering! It's essential to maintain a light-hearted tone amidst the weighty matters of research, isn't it?

In light of these findings, we dare to affirm that no further research is needed in this intersection of soybean cultivation and baby naming trends. We've squeezed every last bit of soy-ntific juice from this topic, and it's safe to say that we've bean there, done that – much like a well-seasoned soybean field. It's time to bid adieu to this soy-cial inquiry and let the echoes of "soy long, farewell" reverberate through the academic corridors!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited GMOybeans: A Soy-Cial Study on the Rylee-iance of Names. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Genetically Modified Organismology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited GMOybeans: A Soy-Cial Study on the Rylee-iance of Names. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Genetically Modified Organism Linguistics and Etymology Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled GMOybeans: A Soy-Cial Study on the Rylee-iance of Names with an abstract of In this study, we sought to uncover the connection between the popularity of the first name Rylee and the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in the state of South Dakota. While the topic might initially seem as unrelated as a soybean in a fruit salad, our findings revealed a surprising correlation that might make you say, "Soy amazing!" Our research team not only delved into the fascinating world of agricultural biotechnology but also dared to explore the whimsical realm of baby naming trends.
Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the United States Department of Agriculture, we conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the years 2000 to 2022. Our statistical analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9143468 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between the rise of Rylee as a popular first name and the increased use of GMO soybeans in the region.
As we unearthed this intriguing correlation, we couldn't help but marvel at the "soy-nergetic" personality of Rylee, much like the resilient soybeans thriving in South Dakota. Our findings invite further exploration into the interplay of agricultural practices and societal trends, proving that research can indeed be both "seedy" and "punny" at the same time.
In conclusion, our study sheds light on the unforeseen relationship between a name's popularity and the adoption of genetically modified soybeans, demonstrating that the intertwining branches of agriculture and nomenclature can yield unexpected connections. We hope this research will inspire others to dig deeper into seemingly unrelated subjects and unveil the hidden "soy-crets" of our world.

ChatGPT:

GMO soybeans, Rylee name popularity, genetically modified organisms, soybeans, South Dakota, agricultural biotechnology, baby naming trends, correlation coefficient, p-value, United States Department of Agriculture, US Social Security Administration, agricultural practices, societal trends, nomenclature connections, hidden connections, research inspiration, soybean adoption, statistical analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Rylee
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Rylee
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Rylee

GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota
Detailed data title: Percent of soybeans planted in South Dakota that are genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota

Correlation r = 0.9143468 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8360302 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Rylee) over the 23 years from 2000 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.06E-9. 0.0000000010615453592144810000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 1.06E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 942,022,864 random variables You don't actually need 942 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.81, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Rylee (Babies born)12361484178722232607278028592895324631083297318430553111302428633134298830222878282228412686
GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota (GMO soybeans %)6880899195959397979898989897979696969793959496




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
  5. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1236,1484,1787,2223,2607,2780,2859,2895,3246,3108,3297,3184,3055,3111,3024,2863,3134,2988,3022,2878,2822,2841,2686,])
array_2 = np.array([68,80,89,91,95,95,93,97,97,98,98,98,98,97,97,96,96,96,97,93,95,94,96,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Rylee"
array_2_name = "GMO use in soybeans in South Dakota"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 3972 · Black Variable ID: 2982 · Red Variable ID: 841
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0