about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,929 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Wind power generated in United Kingdom and the second variable is Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA.  The chart goes from 1988 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

The UK's gusty enthusiasm for wind power was simply blowing Mercedes-Benz USA away, leading to a recall of cars in an attempt to harness some of that renewable energy for their own turbocharged purposes. It seems the air wasn't the only thing getting electric in this shocking correlation!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Data cyber art ] Prompt: Create a vivid and futuristic scene of a serene landscape in the United Kingdom. Show a field of wind turbines towering over lush, rolling hills, their sleek blades spinning vigorously as they harness the power of the wind. Along a nearby country road, grazing sheep are drawn to the area by the increase in wind power, creating a peaceful and harmonious coexistence with the technology. In the distance, a sleek Mercedes-Benz is seen navigating the road cautiously, with a recall notice visible on its windshield, symbolizing the growing presence of sheep near roads and the accompanying rise in animal-related recalls. Capture the juxtaposition of nature, technology, and transportation in a visually stunning and thought-provoking manner. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Wind power generated in United Kingdom and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cubism inspired by bauhaus Oragami Data cyber art Scalar art
ChatGPT: Data cyber art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Wind power generated in United Kingdom and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, in the following situation: Because the increase in wind power caused more sheep to graze near roads, leading to an increase in animal-related recalls for vehicles, including Mercedes-Benz USA.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A field of wind turbines stands tall in the rolling hills of the United Kingdom, their blades spinning vigorously in the gusts of wind. Nearby, a country road is lined with grazing sheep, drawn to the area by the increase in wind power. In the distance, a sleek Mercedes-Benz is seen driving cautiously along the road, a recall notice visible on its windshield, a nod to the rise in animal-related recalls due to the growing presence of sheep near the roads.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Data cyber art ] and depicting this scene: A field of wind turbines stands tall in the rolling hills of the United Kingdom, their blades spinning vigorously in the gusts of wind. Nearby, a country road is lined with grazing sheep, drawn to the area by the increase in wind power. In the distance, a sleek Mercedes-Benz is seen driving cautiously along the road, a recall notice visible on its windshield, a nod to the rise in animal-related recalls due to the growing presence of sheep near the roads. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Data cyber art ] Prompt: Create a vivid and futuristic scene of a serene landscape in the United Kingdom. Show a field of wind turbines towering over lush, rolling hills, their sleek blades spinning vigorously as they harness the power of the wind. Along a nearby country road, grazing sheep are drawn to the area by the increase in wind power, creating a peaceful and harmonious coexistence with the technology. In the distance, a sleek Mercedes-Benz is seen navigating the road cautiously, with a recall notice visible on its windshield, symbolizing the growing presence of sheep near roads and the accompanying rise in animal-related recalls. Capture the juxtaposition of nature, technology, and transportation in a visually stunning and thought-provoking manner.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Wind power generated in United Kingdom caused Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Blowin' in the Wind: Uncovering the Aerodynamic Link between UK Wind Power and Mercedes-Benz Recalls

The Journal of Sustainable Energy Dynamics

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in United Kingdom and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9272557 and p < 0.01 for 1988 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Blowin' in the Wind: Uncovering the Aerodynamic Link between UK Wind Power and Mercedes-Benz Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious correlation between the wind power generated in the United Kingdom and the number of automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. The aim is to uncover the subtle yet impactful aerodynamic influence of wind power on the performance of Mercedes-Benz vehicles. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we meticulously analyzed wind power generation levels in the UK and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA from 1988 to 2021. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9272557, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship.

Indeed, it appears that when it comes to Mercedes-Benz vehicles, the winds of change blow not only through their sleek designs but also in the recall statistics. Every gust of wind seems to carry a whisper of influence on the performance and quality of these automobiles. The findings of this study unveil a new dimension in automotive engineering, where the harmonious dance between wind power and vehicle reliability comes to light.

As the data would suggest, it seems that the issues faced by Mercedes-Benz vehicles may not simply be "blown out of proportion," but rather linked to the whims of the wind. With each recall, it becomes clearer that the automotive industry is, quite literally, "driven" by forces beyond the assembly line. Our research emphasizes the need for further investigation into the atmospheric impact on automotive quality, as we continue to navigate the winds of change in the pursuit of vehicle excellence.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in United Kingdom and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blowin' in the Wind: Uncovering the Aerodynamic Link between UK Wind Power and Mercedes-Benz Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious correlation between the wind power generated in the United Kingdom and the number of automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. The aim is to uncover the subtle yet impactful aerodynamic influence of wind power on the performance of Mercedes-Benz vehicles. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we meticulously analyzed wind power generation levels in the UK and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA from 1988 to 2021. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9272557, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship.

Indeed, it appears that when it comes to Mercedes-Benz vehicles, the winds of change blow not only through their sleek designs but also in the recall statistics. Every gust of wind seems to carry a whisper of influence on the performance and quality of these automobiles. The findings of this study unveil a new dimension in automotive engineering, where the harmonious dance between wind power and vehicle reliability comes to light.

As the data would suggest, it seems that the issues faced by Mercedes-Benz vehicles may not simply be "blown out of proportion," but rather linked to the whims of the wind. With each recall, it becomes clearer that the automotive industry is, quite literally, "driven" by forces beyond the assembly line. Our research emphasizes the need for further investigation into the atmospheric impact on automotive quality, as we continue to navigate the winds of change in the pursuit of vehicle excellence.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Wind power has long been heralded as a sustainable and renewable energy source, harnessing the natural forces of the atmosphere to produce electricity. Meanwhile, the automotive industry has been tirelessly engineering vehicles to withstand various driving conditions, from the calmest breezes to the most tumultuous storms. As these two seemingly disparate domains converge, an unexpected correlation emerges, one that leaves us questioning the very essence of vehicular aerodynamics and reliability.

Picture this: a flock of cars experiencing an inexplicable urge to recall themselves, almost as if they were vying for the title of "most dramatic exit" on the automotive stage. It's almost as if they were auditioning for the role of "Gusty the Car," determined to harness the power of the wind in the most unexpected ways. But alas, this metaphorical performance is not just a whimsical flight of fancy; it's rooted in the tangible statistics and data we've pored over with the utmost diligence.

Our investigation embarks on the uncharted territory of wind power's influence on the vehicular landscape, a journey that promises to uncover the aerodynamic secrets that have remained hidden in the misty gales. With a plethora of wind turbines dotting the United Kingdom's landscape, it's now evident that their impact might not merely be confined to spinning meters, but may also be spinning the wheels of the automotive industry in unforeseen ways.

So, as we set the stage for our obscure yet intriguing investigation, let's not just marvel at the twist and turns that wind power can create -- let's buckle up and prepare to navigate these gusty revelations, for the wind carries more than just whispers; it brings a symphony of paradoxes, a whirlwind of correlations that challenge our perceptions and defy the laws of conventional wisdom.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in United Kingdom and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blowin' in the Wind: Uncovering the Aerodynamic Link between UK Wind Power and Mercedes-Benz Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious correlation between the wind power generated in the United Kingdom and the number of automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. The aim is to uncover the subtle yet impactful aerodynamic influence of wind power on the performance of Mercedes-Benz vehicles. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we meticulously analyzed wind power generation levels in the UK and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA from 1988 to 2021. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9272557, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship.

Indeed, it appears that when it comes to Mercedes-Benz vehicles, the winds of change blow not only through their sleek designs but also in the recall statistics. Every gust of wind seems to carry a whisper of influence on the performance and quality of these automobiles. The findings of this study unveil a new dimension in automotive engineering, where the harmonious dance between wind power and vehicle reliability comes to light.

As the data would suggest, it seems that the issues faced by Mercedes-Benz vehicles may not simply be "blown out of proportion," but rather linked to the whims of the wind. With each recall, it becomes clearer that the automotive industry is, quite literally, "driven" by forces beyond the assembly line. Our research emphasizes the need for further investigation into the atmospheric impact on automotive quality, as we continue to navigate the winds of change in the pursuit of vehicle excellence.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Wind power has long been heralded as a sustainable and renewable energy source, harnessing the natural forces of the atmosphere to produce electricity. Meanwhile, the automotive industry has been tirelessly engineering vehicles to withstand various driving conditions, from the calmest breezes to the most tumultuous storms. As these two seemingly disparate domains converge, an unexpected correlation emerges, one that leaves us questioning the very essence of vehicular aerodynamics and reliability.
Picture this: a flock of cars experiencing an inexplicable urge to recall themselves, almost as if they were vying for the title of "most dramatic exit" on the automotive stage. It's almost as if they were auditioning for the role of "Gusty the Car," determined to harness the power of the wind in the most unexpected ways. But alas, this metaphorical performance is not just a whimsical flight of fancy; it's rooted in the tangible statistics and data we've pored over with the utmost diligence.
Our investigation embarks on the uncharted territory of wind power's influence on the vehicular landscape, a journey that promises to uncover the aerodynamic secrets that have remained hidden in the misty gales. With a plethora of wind turbines dotting the United Kingdom's landscape, it's now evident that their impact might not merely be confined to spinning meters, but may also be spinning the wheels of the automotive industry in unforeseen ways.
So, as we set the stage for our obscure yet intriguing investigation, let's not just marvel at the twist and turns that wind power can create -- let's buckle up and prepare to navigate these gusty revelations, for the wind carries more than just whispers; it brings a symphony of paradoxes, a whirlwind of correlations that challenge our perceptions and defy the laws of conventional wisdom.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The investigation into the enigmatic relationship between UK wind power and Mercedes-Benz recalls has prompted a comprehensive review of existing literature in various interdisciplinary fields. Smith et al. (2015) have contributed to this topic by examining the impact of environmental factors on automotive performance, shedding light on the potential influence of natural elements such as wind on vehicle reliability. Following a similar vein, Doe and Jones (2018) have delved into the atmospheric dynamics that may affect automotive engineering, elucidating the intricate interplay between meteorological conditions and vehicular functionality.

In "Wind Energy Explained" by Manwell, McGowan, and Rogers (2010), the authors detail the principles of wind energy conversion and its utilization in power generation. While not explicitly focused on automotive engineering, this foundational text offers insights into the undeniable force of wind and its far-reaching implications, serving as a precursor to our investigation's unexpected revelations. Additionally, "Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us" by Daniel H. Pink (2009) explores the factors that drive human behavior, analogously resonating with the unanticipated driving forces behind vehicular recalls that we seek to uncover.

Turning to the realm of fiction, Michael Crichton's "Airframe" (1996) takes readers on a thrilling journey through the aerospace industry, delving into the complexities of safety and engineering within the transportation sector. While this novel may seem tangential to our study, it exemplifies the inherent suspense and unpredictability that are emblematic of our investigative pursuit. On a lighter note, the whimsical "Gone with the Wind" by Margaret Mitchell (1936) presents a romanticized portrayal of turbulence and tumult that, in a roundabout way, captures the essence of our research's unexpected correlation.

Beyond conventional academic sources, our thorough literature review extended to unorthodox avenues, including the perusal of grocery lists, cat memes, and even the incidental musings inscribed on the back of fast-food napkins. However, as amusing as these diversions were, they regrettably failed to yield any substantial insights into our research query. Thus, we resolutely returned to scholarly works and reputable publications to uphold the integrity of our investigation, fervently chasing the elusive trail of wind-blown automotive enigmas.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in United Kingdom and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and US DOT . You used data from 1988 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blowin' in the Wind: Uncovering the Aerodynamic Link between UK Wind Power and Mercedes-Benz Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious correlation between the wind power generated in the United Kingdom and the number of automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. The aim is to uncover the subtle yet impactful aerodynamic influence of wind power on the performance of Mercedes-Benz vehicles. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we meticulously analyzed wind power generation levels in the UK and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA from 1988 to 2021. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9272557, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship.

Indeed, it appears that when it comes to Mercedes-Benz vehicles, the winds of change blow not only through their sleek designs but also in the recall statistics. Every gust of wind seems to carry a whisper of influence on the performance and quality of these automobiles. The findings of this study unveil a new dimension in automotive engineering, where the harmonious dance between wind power and vehicle reliability comes to light.

As the data would suggest, it seems that the issues faced by Mercedes-Benz vehicles may not simply be "blown out of proportion," but rather linked to the whims of the wind. With each recall, it becomes clearer that the automotive industry is, quite literally, "driven" by forces beyond the assembly line. Our research emphasizes the need for further investigation into the atmospheric impact on automotive quality, as we continue to navigate the winds of change in the pursuit of vehicle excellence.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Wind power has long been heralded as a sustainable and renewable energy source, harnessing the natural forces of the atmosphere to produce electricity. Meanwhile, the automotive industry has been tirelessly engineering vehicles to withstand various driving conditions, from the calmest breezes to the most tumultuous storms. As these two seemingly disparate domains converge, an unexpected correlation emerges, one that leaves us questioning the very essence of vehicular aerodynamics and reliability.
Picture this: a flock of cars experiencing an inexplicable urge to recall themselves, almost as if they were vying for the title of "most dramatic exit" on the automotive stage. It's almost as if they were auditioning for the role of "Gusty the Car," determined to harness the power of the wind in the most unexpected ways. But alas, this metaphorical performance is not just a whimsical flight of fancy; it's rooted in the tangible statistics and data we've pored over with the utmost diligence.
Our investigation embarks on the uncharted territory of wind power's influence on the vehicular landscape, a journey that promises to uncover the aerodynamic secrets that have remained hidden in the misty gales. With a plethora of wind turbines dotting the United Kingdom's landscape, it's now evident that their impact might not merely be confined to spinning meters, but may also be spinning the wheels of the automotive industry in unforeseen ways.
So, as we set the stage for our obscure yet intriguing investigation, let's not just marvel at the twist and turns that wind power can create -- let's buckle up and prepare to navigate these gusty revelations, for the wind carries more than just whispers; it brings a symphony of paradoxes, a whirlwind of correlations that challenge our perceptions and defy the laws of conventional wisdom.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic link between UK wind power and Mercedes-Benz recalls, we employed a methodological approach that was as methodical as it was whimsical. First, we gathered comprehensive data on wind power generation in the United Kingdom, drawing from the Energy Information Administration's wind energy reports. This meticulous data collection process involved sifting through a vast expanse of information, not unlike a wind turbine catching every gust with unwavering precision. Our data collection team was particularly adept at separating the "wheat" from the "chaff" in this blustery digital field.

Once the wind power data was firmly in our grasp, we crafted a bespoke algorithm that bore a striking resemblance to a weather vane; this algorithm not only pointed us in the right statistical direction but also imbued our research with a charm that can only be described as a breath of fresh air. With a dash of statistical wizardry and a hint of whimsical flair, we correlated the wind power levels with the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA, bringing to light a correlation so compelling, it could arguably be described as "shear" brilliance.

Of course, no academic adventure would be complete without a touch of drollery, so we infused our regression analysis with a sprinkle of hilarity and aptly named it the "Zephyr Regression Model." Much like the atmospheric zephyrs that inspire poets and thinkers, our statistical model aimed to inspire insight and revelation in our pursuit of automotive aerodynamic understanding.

In order to further bolster the credibility of our findings, we adopted a control group comparison approach that was as rigorous as it was droll. Drawing inspiration from the whimsical world of automotive engineering, we likened our control groups to the unsung heroes of the vehicular realm, the underappreciated lug nuts and bolts that ensure the smooth functioning of every automobile. With this comparison, we were able to ensure that our findings were as sturdy and reliable as a well-tightened lug nut on a blustery day.

As any seasoned researcher would attest, one cannot truly fathom the depths of correlation without navigating the treacherous waters of nonparametric statistics. In our quest to uncover the nuanced relationship between wind power and automotive recalls, we dabbled in the mystical arts of nonparametric analysis, where p-values took on a life of their own and statistical significance danced to the tune of an unseen breeze.

In a lighthearted quest for scientific enlightenment, we adorned our methodology with more than just statistical prowess; we infused it with a dose of levity that brought a gust of joy to the often tempestuous world of academic research. For, as any good researcher knows, a well-timed quip can be the tailwind that propels even the most formidable academic undertaking to victory.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in United Kingdom and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and US DOT .

For the time period 1988 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9272557, r-squared of 0.8598032, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blowin' in the Wind: Uncovering the Aerodynamic Link between UK Wind Power and Mercedes-Benz Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious correlation between the wind power generated in the United Kingdom and the number of automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. The aim is to uncover the subtle yet impactful aerodynamic influence of wind power on the performance of Mercedes-Benz vehicles. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we meticulously analyzed wind power generation levels in the UK and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA from 1988 to 2021. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9272557, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship.

Indeed, it appears that when it comes to Mercedes-Benz vehicles, the winds of change blow not only through their sleek designs but also in the recall statistics. Every gust of wind seems to carry a whisper of influence on the performance and quality of these automobiles. The findings of this study unveil a new dimension in automotive engineering, where the harmonious dance between wind power and vehicle reliability comes to light.

As the data would suggest, it seems that the issues faced by Mercedes-Benz vehicles may not simply be "blown out of proportion," but rather linked to the whims of the wind. With each recall, it becomes clearer that the automotive industry is, quite literally, "driven" by forces beyond the assembly line. Our research emphasizes the need for further investigation into the atmospheric impact on automotive quality, as we continue to navigate the winds of change in the pursuit of vehicle excellence.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Wind power has long been heralded as a sustainable and renewable energy source, harnessing the natural forces of the atmosphere to produce electricity. Meanwhile, the automotive industry has been tirelessly engineering vehicles to withstand various driving conditions, from the calmest breezes to the most tumultuous storms. As these two seemingly disparate domains converge, an unexpected correlation emerges, one that leaves us questioning the very essence of vehicular aerodynamics and reliability.
Picture this: a flock of cars experiencing an inexplicable urge to recall themselves, almost as if they were vying for the title of "most dramatic exit" on the automotive stage. It's almost as if they were auditioning for the role of "Gusty the Car," determined to harness the power of the wind in the most unexpected ways. But alas, this metaphorical performance is not just a whimsical flight of fancy; it's rooted in the tangible statistics and data we've pored over with the utmost diligence.
Our investigation embarks on the uncharted territory of wind power's influence on the vehicular landscape, a journey that promises to uncover the aerodynamic secrets that have remained hidden in the misty gales. With a plethora of wind turbines dotting the United Kingdom's landscape, it's now evident that their impact might not merely be confined to spinning meters, but may also be spinning the wheels of the automotive industry in unforeseen ways.
So, as we set the stage for our obscure yet intriguing investigation, let's not just marvel at the twist and turns that wind power can create -- let's buckle up and prepare to navigate these gusty revelations, for the wind carries more than just whispers; it brings a symphony of paradoxes, a whirlwind of correlations that challenge our perceptions and defy the laws of conventional wisdom.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the relationship between wind power generation in the United Kingdom and the frequency of automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA from 1988 to 2021 revealed a remarkably strong correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.9272557 and an r-squared value of 0.8598032 pointed to a highly significant association between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Moreover, with a p-value of less than 0.01, the statistical evidence further supported the substantial link between UK wind power and Mercedes-Benz recalls.

Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot, showcasing the pronounced correlation between UK wind power generation and Mercedes-Benz automotive recalls. The visual representation unmistakably illustrates the tight relationship between these variables, leaving little room for doubt regarding the influence of wind power on automotive performance.

It's clear that this correlation is not merely a fleeting gust of statistical significance but rather a sustained breeze of influence, shaping the landscape of automotive reliability. The findings of this study shed light on the intricate interplay between environmental factors and vehicular engineering, challenging conventional notions about the isolated nature of automotive performance.

As we unravel the aerodynamic tendrils that extend from wind turbines to automotive assembly lines, it's becoming increasingly evident that the winds of change carry more than just an ethereal presence. They seem to whisper intricate instructions to the very fabric of vehicle performance, as if each zephyr is a subtle directive on the assembly of automotive prowess.

It appears that in the automotive industry, the winds of change don't just knock on the door; they barge in, demanding attention and calling for a reevaluation of traditional paradigms. And while it may seem like a "blowhard" of a theory at first, the data supports the notion that the winds of the United Kingdom have indeed found their way into the nuanced mechanics of Mercedes-Benz vehicles across the ocean.

The implications of this research extend beyond the scope of wind power and automotive recalls; they beckon us to consider the broader impact of environmental variables on industrial outcomes. The study highlights the need for a holistic approach to vehicle engineering, one that encompasses the subtle yet influential forces of nature, inviting further explorations into the aerodynamic ballet between the elements and automotive excellence.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in United Kingdom and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Blowin' in the Wind: Uncovering the Aerodynamic Link between UK Wind Power and Mercedes-Benz Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious correlation between the wind power generated in the United Kingdom and the number of automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. The aim is to uncover the subtle yet impactful aerodynamic influence of wind power on the performance of Mercedes-Benz vehicles. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we meticulously analyzed wind power generation levels in the UK and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA from 1988 to 2021. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9272557, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship.

Indeed, it appears that when it comes to Mercedes-Benz vehicles, the winds of change blow not only through their sleek designs but also in the recall statistics. Every gust of wind seems to carry a whisper of influence on the performance and quality of these automobiles. The findings of this study unveil a new dimension in automotive engineering, where the harmonious dance between wind power and vehicle reliability comes to light.

As the data would suggest, it seems that the issues faced by Mercedes-Benz vehicles may not simply be "blown out of proportion," but rather linked to the whims of the wind. With each recall, it becomes clearer that the automotive industry is, quite literally, "driven" by forces beyond the assembly line. Our research emphasizes the need for further investigation into the atmospheric impact on automotive quality, as we continue to navigate the winds of change in the pursuit of vehicle excellence.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation into the enigmatic relationship between UK wind power and Mercedes-Benz recalls has prompted a comprehensive review of existing literature in various interdisciplinary fields. Smith et al. (2015) have contributed to this topic by examining the impact of environmental factors on automotive performance, shedding light on the potential influence of natural elements such as wind on vehicle reliability. Following a similar vein, Doe and Jones (2018) have delved into the atmospheric dynamics that may affect automotive engineering, elucidating the intricate interplay between meteorological conditions and vehicular functionality.
In "Wind Energy Explained" by Manwell, McGowan, and Rogers (2010), the authors detail the principles of wind energy conversion and its utilization in power generation. While not explicitly focused on automotive engineering, this foundational text offers insights into the undeniable force of wind and its far-reaching implications, serving as a precursor to our investigation's unexpected revelations. Additionally, "Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us" by Daniel H. Pink (2009) explores the factors that drive human behavior, analogously resonating with the unanticipated driving forces behind vehicular recalls that we seek to uncover.
Turning to the realm of fiction, Michael Crichton's "Airframe" (1996) takes readers on a thrilling journey through the aerospace industry, delving into the complexities of safety and engineering within the transportation sector. While this novel may seem tangential to our study, it exemplifies the inherent suspense and unpredictability that are emblematic of our investigative pursuit. On a lighter note, the whimsical "Gone with the Wind" by Margaret Mitchell (1936) presents a romanticized portrayal of turbulence and tumult that, in a roundabout way, captures the essence of our research's unexpected correlation.
Beyond conventional academic sources, our thorough literature review extended to unorthodox avenues, including the perusal of grocery lists, cat memes, and even the incidental musings inscribed on the back of fast-food napkins. However, as amusing as these diversions were, they regrettably failed to yield any substantial insights into our research query. Thus, we resolutely returned to scholarly works and reputable publications to uphold the integrity of our investigation, fervently chasing the elusive trail of wind-blown automotive enigmas.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between wind power generation in the United Kingdom and the frequency of automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA from 1988 to 2021 revealed a remarkably strong correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.9272557 and an r-squared value of 0.8598032 pointed to a highly significant association between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Moreover, with a p-value of less than 0.01, the statistical evidence further supported the substantial link between UK wind power and Mercedes-Benz recalls.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot, showcasing the pronounced correlation between UK wind power generation and Mercedes-Benz automotive recalls. The visual representation unmistakably illustrates the tight relationship between these variables, leaving little room for doubt regarding the influence of wind power on automotive performance.
It's clear that this correlation is not merely a fleeting gust of statistical significance but rather a sustained breeze of influence, shaping the landscape of automotive reliability. The findings of this study shed light on the intricate interplay between environmental factors and vehicular engineering, challenging conventional notions about the isolated nature of automotive performance.
As we unravel the aerodynamic tendrils that extend from wind turbines to automotive assembly lines, it's becoming increasingly evident that the winds of change carry more than just an ethereal presence. They seem to whisper intricate instructions to the very fabric of vehicle performance, as if each zephyr is a subtle directive on the assembly of automotive prowess.
It appears that in the automotive industry, the winds of change don't just knock on the door; they barge in, demanding attention and calling for a reevaluation of traditional paradigms. And while it may seem like a "blowhard" of a theory at first, the data supports the notion that the winds of the United Kingdom have indeed found their way into the nuanced mechanics of Mercedes-Benz vehicles across the ocean.
The implications of this research extend beyond the scope of wind power and automotive recalls; they beckon us to consider the broader impact of environmental variables on industrial outcomes. The study highlights the need for a holistic approach to vehicle engineering, one that encompasses the subtle yet influential forces of nature, inviting further explorations into the aerodynamic ballet between the elements and automotive excellence.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study shed light on the unexpected yet compelling relationship between UK wind power generation and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. While at first glance, this correlation may appear as flimsy as a sail in calm weather, our robust statistical analysis reveals a surprisingly strong link, akin to the sturdy anchor of a ship amidst turbulent winds.

Our results not only confirm the prior research by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018) on the potential influence of environmental factors on automotive performance but also take it a step further, suggesting that the impact of wind power extends beyond mere speculation and into the tangible realm of automotive engineering. This substantiates our earlier jest that the issues faced by Mercedes-Benz vehicles are not "blown out of proportion," but rather intricately linked to the whims of the wind.

The significant correlation coefficient of 0.9272557 and an r-squared value of 0.8598032 signify a robust relationship between wind power generation in the UK and Mercedes-Benz recalls, lending support to the notion that the winds of change, quite literally, produce a noticeable effect on the performance and reliability of these vehicles. Not to "blow our own horn," but the p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters the statistical significance of this association, leaving little room for doubt concerning the charismatic influence of wind power on automotive quality.

What's more, this correlation stands as a testament to the impactful role of environmental factors in the automotive industry, defying conventional wisdom that vehicular performance is impervious to the whims of nature. In essence, it seems that when it comes to vehicles, the winds of the United Kingdom do much more than "drive" forward innovation; they intricately mold the fabric of automotive excellence.

In line with our literature review's whimsical touch, we approached this investigation with an open mind, akin to chasing after the elusive nature of wind itself. Our findings, while surprising, challenge traditional paradigms and beckon researchers to venture further into the realms of atmospheric influence on industrial outcomes. This study serves as a gentle yet persistent reminder that in the quest for automotive excellence, it's crucial to consider the subtle yet influential forces of nature, as they may hold the key to unlocking new dimensions of vehicular reliability and performance. And who knows, perhaps the next time an automotive recall is issued, we'll simply attribute it to "the winds of change" and move forward in the pursuit of vehicle excellence.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in United Kingdom and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Blowin' in the Wind: Uncovering the Aerodynamic Link between UK Wind Power and Mercedes-Benz Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious correlation between the wind power generated in the United Kingdom and the number of automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. The aim is to uncover the subtle yet impactful aerodynamic influence of wind power on the performance of Mercedes-Benz vehicles. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we meticulously analyzed wind power generation levels in the UK and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA from 1988 to 2021. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9272557, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship.

Indeed, it appears that when it comes to Mercedes-Benz vehicles, the winds of change blow not only through their sleek designs but also in the recall statistics. Every gust of wind seems to carry a whisper of influence on the performance and quality of these automobiles. The findings of this study unveil a new dimension in automotive engineering, where the harmonious dance between wind power and vehicle reliability comes to light.

As the data would suggest, it seems that the issues faced by Mercedes-Benz vehicles may not simply be "blown out of proportion," but rather linked to the whims of the wind. With each recall, it becomes clearer that the automotive industry is, quite literally, "driven" by forces beyond the assembly line. Our research emphasizes the need for further investigation into the atmospheric impact on automotive quality, as we continue to navigate the winds of change in the pursuit of vehicle excellence.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Wind power has long been heralded as a sustainable and renewable energy source, harnessing the natural forces of the atmosphere to produce electricity. Meanwhile, the automotive industry has been tirelessly engineering vehicles to withstand various driving conditions, from the calmest breezes to the most tumultuous storms. As these two seemingly disparate domains converge, an unexpected correlation emerges, one that leaves us questioning the very essence of vehicular aerodynamics and reliability.
Picture this: a flock of cars experiencing an inexplicable urge to recall themselves, almost as if they were vying for the title of "most dramatic exit" on the automotive stage. It's almost as if they were auditioning for the role of "Gusty the Car," determined to harness the power of the wind in the most unexpected ways. But alas, this metaphorical performance is not just a whimsical flight of fancy; it's rooted in the tangible statistics and data we've pored over with the utmost diligence.
Our investigation embarks on the uncharted territory of wind power's influence on the vehicular landscape, a journey that promises to uncover the aerodynamic secrets that have remained hidden in the misty gales. With a plethora of wind turbines dotting the United Kingdom's landscape, it's now evident that their impact might not merely be confined to spinning meters, but may also be spinning the wheels of the automotive industry in unforeseen ways.
So, as we set the stage for our obscure yet intriguing investigation, let's not just marvel at the twist and turns that wind power can create -- let's buckle up and prepare to navigate these gusty revelations, for the wind carries more than just whispers; it brings a symphony of paradoxes, a whirlwind of correlations that challenge our perceptions and defy the laws of conventional wisdom.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between wind power generation in the United Kingdom and the frequency of automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA from 1988 to 2021 revealed a remarkably strong correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.9272557 and an r-squared value of 0.8598032 pointed to a highly significant association between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Moreover, with a p-value of less than 0.01, the statistical evidence further supported the substantial link between UK wind power and Mercedes-Benz recalls.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot, showcasing the pronounced correlation between UK wind power generation and Mercedes-Benz automotive recalls. The visual representation unmistakably illustrates the tight relationship between these variables, leaving little room for doubt regarding the influence of wind power on automotive performance.
It's clear that this correlation is not merely a fleeting gust of statistical significance but rather a sustained breeze of influence, shaping the landscape of automotive reliability. The findings of this study shed light on the intricate interplay between environmental factors and vehicular engineering, challenging conventional notions about the isolated nature of automotive performance.
As we unravel the aerodynamic tendrils that extend from wind turbines to automotive assembly lines, it's becoming increasingly evident that the winds of change carry more than just an ethereal presence. They seem to whisper intricate instructions to the very fabric of vehicle performance, as if each zephyr is a subtle directive on the assembly of automotive prowess.
It appears that in the automotive industry, the winds of change don't just knock on the door; they barge in, demanding attention and calling for a reevaluation of traditional paradigms. And while it may seem like a "blowhard" of a theory at first, the data supports the notion that the winds of the United Kingdom have indeed found their way into the nuanced mechanics of Mercedes-Benz vehicles across the ocean.
The implications of this research extend beyond the scope of wind power and automotive recalls; they beckon us to consider the broader impact of environmental variables on industrial outcomes. The study highlights the need for a holistic approach to vehicle engineering, one that encompasses the subtle yet influential forces of nature, inviting further explorations into the aerodynamic ballet between the elements and automotive excellence.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

In conclusion, our study has unearthed an unexpected yet compelling relationship between UK wind power and Mercedes-Benz automotive recalls. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9272557, with a p-value of less than 0.01, serves as a testament to the profound influence of wind power on the reliability of Mercedes-Benz vehicles.

It seems that when it comes to automotive performance, even the winds of change have a role to play! It's almost as if the vehicles are saying, "Winds of the United Kingdom, guide me through this stormy recall process!" Dad joke level: maximum.

The implications of this research are nothing to blow off, as they underscore the importance of considering environmental factors in automotive engineering. It's as if Mother Nature is providing a constant (wind)stream of feedback on vehicle performance. Get it? Windstream? Breeze through these findings!

Further investigation into the aerodynamic interplay between environmental variables and automotive reliability may yield even more surprising connections. However, at this point, we can confidently assert that no more research is needed in this area. It's time to steer our focus elsewhere and leave the winds of correlation to rustle through the annals of automotive history.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Blowin' in the Wind: Uncovering the Aerodynamic Link between UK Wind Power and Mercedes-Benz Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sustainable Energy Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Blowin' in the Wind: Uncovering the Aerodynamic Link between UK Wind Power and Mercedes-Benz Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Association for Renewable Energy Dynamics and Automobile Safety Studies (AREDASS)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Blowin' in the Wind: Uncovering the Aerodynamic Link between UK Wind Power and Mercedes-Benz Recalls with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the curious correlation between the wind power generated in the United Kingdom and the number of automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. The aim is to uncover the subtle yet impactful aerodynamic influence of wind power on the performance of Mercedes-Benz vehicles. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the US Department of Transportation, we meticulously analyzed wind power generation levels in the UK and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA from 1988 to 2021. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9272557, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship.
Indeed, it appears that when it comes to Mercedes-Benz vehicles, the winds of change blow not only through their sleek designs but also in the recall statistics. Every gust of wind seems to carry a whisper of influence on the performance and quality of these automobiles. The findings of this study unveil a new dimension in automotive engineering, where the harmonious dance between wind power and vehicle reliability comes to light.
As the data would suggest, it seems that the issues faced by Mercedes-Benz vehicles may not simply be "blown out of proportion," but rather linked to the whims of the wind. With each recall, it becomes clearer that the automotive industry is, quite literally, "driven" by forces beyond the assembly line. Our research emphasizes the need for further investigation into the atmospheric impact on automotive quality, as we continue to navigate the winds of change in the pursuit of vehicle excellence.

ChatGPT:

UK wind power, Mercedes-Benz recalls, aerodynamic influence, wind power generation, automotive recalls, Energy Information Administration, US Department of Transportation, wind power correlation, automotive reliability, atmospheric impact on automotive quality, vehicle performance, wind influence on vehicles

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Wind power generated in United Kingdom
Detailed data title: Total wind power generated in United Kingdom in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Wind power generated in United Kingdom

Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA
Detailed data title: Automotive recals issued by Mercedes-Benz USA
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA

Correlation r = 0.9272557 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8598032 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 86% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Wind power generated in United Kingdom) over the 34 years from 1988 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.3E-15. 0.0000000000000033459842715997
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 3.3E-13% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 298,865,720,466,135 random variables You don't actually need 298 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 33 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 33 because we have two variables measured over a period of 34 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.86, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Wind power generated in United Kingdom (Billion kWh)0.0010.0090.0090.0110.040.2180.3420.3910.4880.6670.8770.850.9470.9651.2561.2851.9352.9044.2255.2747.1229.28110.28615.96319.84728.39731.95940.274737.159449.641156.906363.795275.369164.0083
Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA (Recalls)20311322312446534553833484618233839333849




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.001,0.009,0.009,0.011,0.04,0.218,0.342,0.391,0.488,0.667,0.877,0.85,0.947,0.965,1.256,1.285,1.935,2.904,4.225,5.274,7.122,9.281,10.286,15.963,19.847,28.397,31.959,40.2747,37.1594,49.6411,56.9063,63.7952,75.3691,64.0083,])
array_2 = np.array([2,0,3,1,1,3,2,2,3,1,2,4,4,6,5,3,4,5,5,3,8,3,3,4,8,4,6,18,23,38,39,33,38,49,])
array_1_name = "Wind power generated in United Kingdom"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 3929 · Black Variable ID: 24072 · Red Variable ID: 1122
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0