Report an error
Wind power generated in United Kingdom correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Google searches for 'how to learn python' | r=0.99 | 15yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Leo | r=0.99 | 34yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Eleanor | r=0.99 | 34yrs | Yes! |
| The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.98 | 32yrs | No |
| Number of websites on the internet | r=0.98 | 28yrs | No |
| Total likes of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos | r=0.98 | 15yrs | No |
| London Gold Prices | r=0.97 | 25yrs | No |
| McDonald's stock price (MCD) | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| Annual US household spending on fresh fruits | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
| Butter consumption | r=0.95 | 32yrs | Yes! |
| Microsoft's Worldwide Earnings | r=0.95 | 20yrs | No |
| The distance between Neptune and Uranus | r=0.94 | 34yrs | Yes! |
| Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA | r=0.93 | 34yrs | Yes! |
Wind power generated in United Kingdom also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)