about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,877 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Boston Celtics' annual draft pick count and the second variable is Liquefied petroleum gas used in Guyana.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

The fewer draft picks meant fewer Celtics, which led to a decrease in hot air production, creating a shortage of LPG in Guyana, where they were apparently big fans of the Celtics.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s that depicts a basketball court with the Boston Celtics' logo at center court. The draft pick count decreases, causing a ripple effect of basketball energy to spread outward, transforming into a stream of LPG flowing through the bustling streets of Guyana. The diminishing draft pick count mirrors the decreasing LPG supply, creating a visual representation of the interconnected balance between basketball and flammable gas. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Boston Celtics' annual draft pick count and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Guyana. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Art nouveau Cutsy art illustration Concept art A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Steampunk
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Boston Celtics' annual draft pick count and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Guyana, in the following situation: Because as the Boston Celtics' draft pick count decreased, the cosmic balance of basketball energy shifted, causing a chain reaction that led to a shortage of LPG in Guyana. It's like Newton's third law, but with sports and flammable gas.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Imagine a basketball court with the Boston Celtics' logo at center court. The draft pick count decreases, causing the basketball energy to ripple outwards. This ripple effect travels across the court and transforms into a stream of LPG flowing through the bustling streets of Guyana. As the draft pick count diminishes, the LPG supply diminishes, creating a visual representation of the interconnected balance between basketball and flammable gas.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a basketball court with the Boston Celtics' logo at center court. The draft pick count decreases, causing the basketball energy to ripple outwards. This ripple effect travels across the court and transforms into a stream of LPG flowing through the bustling streets of Guyana. As the draft pick count diminishes, the LPG supply diminishes, creating a visual representation of the interconnected balance between basketball and flammable gas. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s that depicts a basketball court with the Boston Celtics' logo at center court. The draft pick count decreases, causing a ripple effect of basketball energy to spread outward, transforming into a stream of LPG flowing through the bustling streets of Guyana. The diminishing draft pick count mirrors the decreasing LPG supply, creating a visual representation of the interconnected balance between basketball and flammable gas.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Boston Celtics' annual draft pick count caused Liquefied petroleum gas used in Guyana to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
From Celtics Picks to Gas Leaks: A Correlation That's Nothin' But Net

The Journal of Quirky Correlations

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Boston Celtics' annual draft pick count and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Guyana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Basketball Refererence and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7488593 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
From Celtics Picks to Gas Leaks: A Correlation That's Nothin' But Net

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Guyana. Despite the apparent disparity between these two seemingly unrelated entities, our team sought to uncover any potential correlations lurking beneath the surface. By employing data from Basketball Reference and the Energy Information Administration, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7488593 and a significant level of p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on this unanticipated relationship but also highlight the importance of keeping an open mind when exploring statistical phenomena. This research serves as a lighthearted yet thought-provoking addition to the growing field of interdisciplinary connections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Boston Celtics' annual draft pick count and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Guyana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Celtics Picks to Gas Leaks: A Correlation That's Nothin' But Net

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Guyana. Despite the apparent disparity between these two seemingly unrelated entities, our team sought to uncover any potential correlations lurking beneath the surface. By employing data from Basketball Reference and the Energy Information Administration, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7488593 and a significant level of p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on this unanticipated relationship but also highlight the importance of keeping an open mind when exploring statistical phenomena. This research serves as a lighthearted yet thought-provoking addition to the growing field of interdisciplinary connections.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The world of sports and the realm of energy usage may seem to exist in entirely separate universes, much like the Boston Celtics and the small South American nation of Guyana. Nevertheless, as the famous basketball coach Phil Jackson once said, "The strength of the team is each individual member. The strength of each member is the team." With this sentiment in mind, our team embarked on a journey to investigate whether a similar symbiotic relationship could be found between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Guyana.

While the Boston Celtics have been making moves on the court for decades, Guyana has quietly been consuming LPG for various domestic, commercial, and industrial purposes. The seemingly incongruous nature of these two entities piqued our curiosity, leading us to scrutinize their respective timelines and statistics for any sign of correlation.

In the following pages, we shall delve into the data, analyze the numbers, and perhaps even shoot some statistical three-pointers to shed light on this improbable association. Amidst the sea of serious scholarly endeavors, it's healthy to take a break and explore the unexpected, the absurd, and the seemingly impossible. As Mark Twain so aptly put it, "The secret source of humor is not joy but sorrow; there is no humor in heaven."

So join us as we traverse the intersection of basketball and gas consumption, where hoops meet heat and rebounds collide with releases of energy. Together, we shall unravel a correlation that's nothin' but net - quite literally. And who knows, we might just find that this connection, however bizarre, has more substance than the infamous "lucky bounce" in a game of basketball.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Boston Celtics' annual draft pick count and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Guyana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Celtics Picks to Gas Leaks: A Correlation That's Nothin' But Net

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Guyana. Despite the apparent disparity between these two seemingly unrelated entities, our team sought to uncover any potential correlations lurking beneath the surface. By employing data from Basketball Reference and the Energy Information Administration, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7488593 and a significant level of p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on this unanticipated relationship but also highlight the importance of keeping an open mind when exploring statistical phenomena. This research serves as a lighthearted yet thought-provoking addition to the growing field of interdisciplinary connections.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of sports and the realm of energy usage may seem to exist in entirely separate universes, much like the Boston Celtics and the small South American nation of Guyana. Nevertheless, as the famous basketball coach Phil Jackson once said, "The strength of the team is each individual member. The strength of each member is the team." With this sentiment in mind, our team embarked on a journey to investigate whether a similar symbiotic relationship could be found between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Guyana.
While the Boston Celtics have been making moves on the court for decades, Guyana has quietly been consuming LPG for various domestic, commercial, and industrial purposes. The seemingly incongruous nature of these two entities piqued our curiosity, leading us to scrutinize their respective timelines and statistics for any sign of correlation.
In the following pages, we shall delve into the data, analyze the numbers, and perhaps even shoot some statistical three-pointers to shed light on this improbable association. Amidst the sea of serious scholarly endeavors, it's healthy to take a break and explore the unexpected, the absurd, and the seemingly impossible. As Mark Twain so aptly put it, "The secret source of humor is not joy but sorrow; there is no humor in heaven."
So join us as we traverse the intersection of basketball and gas consumption, where hoops meet heat and rebounds collide with releases of energy. Together, we shall unravel a correlation that's nothin' but net - quite literally. And who knows, we might just find that this connection, however bizarre, has more substance than the infamous "lucky bounce" in a game of basketball.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The correlation between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Guyana has been a subject of much speculation and interest among scholars. Early investigations by Smith (2005), Doe (2010), and Jones (2015) primarily focused on the statistical analysis of sports team performance and energy consumption patterns. These foundational studies set the stage for our research, as they laid bare the potential for unexpected connections between seemingly disparate domains.

Turning to non-fiction literature, books such as "Freakonomics" by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner and "Moneyball" by Michael Lewis have underscored the uncanny relationships that can emerge from analyzing unconventional data streams. Although these works primarily examine economics and sports, respectively, they have provided insights into the unorthodox pathways that can lead to surprising correlations.

In a somewhat surreal departure from the realm of non-fiction, authors such as Douglas Adams ("The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy"), Kurt Vonnegut ("Cat's Cradle"), and Haruki Murakami ("Kafka on the Shore") have crafted narratives that explore the absurd and the inexplicable. While their works may not directly address the correlation between basketball drafts and gas usage, they remind us of the boundless potential for unexpected connections in the universe.

Shifting our gaze from literature to cinema, the film "Space Jam" – a classic of the 1990s – seamlessly intertwines the worlds of basketball and animation, illustrating the unforeseen intersections that can occur in the most unlikely scenarios. The comedic escapades of Bugs Bunny and the earnest determination of Michael Jordan serve as a testament to the unanticipated pairings that may lurk beneath the surface of seemingly distinct realms.

In synthesizing these scholarly and cultural touchstones, our team endeavors to illuminate the mysterious threads that weave through the fabric of statistical phenomena. As we navigate the entwined worlds of sports drafts and energy consumption, we remain ever mindful of the potential for laughter, surprise, and, perhaps, a slam dunk of statistical correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Boston Celtics' annual draft pick count and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Guyana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Basketball Refererence and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Celtics Picks to Gas Leaks: A Correlation That's Nothin' But Net

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Guyana. Despite the apparent disparity between these two seemingly unrelated entities, our team sought to uncover any potential correlations lurking beneath the surface. By employing data from Basketball Reference and the Energy Information Administration, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7488593 and a significant level of p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on this unanticipated relationship but also highlight the importance of keeping an open mind when exploring statistical phenomena. This research serves as a lighthearted yet thought-provoking addition to the growing field of interdisciplinary connections.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of sports and the realm of energy usage may seem to exist in entirely separate universes, much like the Boston Celtics and the small South American nation of Guyana. Nevertheless, as the famous basketball coach Phil Jackson once said, "The strength of the team is each individual member. The strength of each member is the team." With this sentiment in mind, our team embarked on a journey to investigate whether a similar symbiotic relationship could be found between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Guyana.
While the Boston Celtics have been making moves on the court for decades, Guyana has quietly been consuming LPG for various domestic, commercial, and industrial purposes. The seemingly incongruous nature of these two entities piqued our curiosity, leading us to scrutinize their respective timelines and statistics for any sign of correlation.
In the following pages, we shall delve into the data, analyze the numbers, and perhaps even shoot some statistical three-pointers to shed light on this improbable association. Amidst the sea of serious scholarly endeavors, it's healthy to take a break and explore the unexpected, the absurd, and the seemingly impossible. As Mark Twain so aptly put it, "The secret source of humor is not joy but sorrow; there is no humor in heaven."
So join us as we traverse the intersection of basketball and gas consumption, where hoops meet heat and rebounds collide with releases of energy. Together, we shall unravel a correlation that's nothin' but net - quite literally. And who knows, we might just find that this connection, however bizarre, has more substance than the infamous "lucky bounce" in a game of basketball.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this research involved a combination of data collection, statistical analysis, and some good old-fashioned statistical hoop-jumping.

Data Collection:
To begin our exploration of the apparent relationship between the Boston Celtics' annual draft pick count and LPG consumption in Guyana, we scoured the depths of the internet, seamlessly transitioning from basketball databases to energy consumption reports. Our primary sources of data were Basketball Reference, where we gathered detailed information about the Celtics' draft picks from 1980 to 2021, and the Energy Information Administration, which provided comprehensive data on LPG usage in Guyana over the same time period. The data collection process involved no dunking or dribbling, but rather meticulous extraction of numerical values and draft pick histories.

Statistical Analysis:
Once the data were collected, we rigorously unpacked them using an arsenal of statistical tools. We calculated the correlation coefficient between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the consumption of LPG in Guyana, utilizing complex mathematical computations that were more precise than a Celtics player's jump shot. Furthermore, we conducted hypothesis testing to ascertain the significance of the observed correlation, employing techniques that were as methodical as a well-executed layup. To ensure the robustness of our findings, we also conducted sensitivity analyses and cross-validated our results using a variety of statistical models. Our statistical analysis was as tight and disciplined as a Celtics defense in the finals, leaving no room for loose ends or defensive lapses.

Statistical Hoop-Jumping:
In addition to traditional statistical methods, we ventured into the realm of unconventional statistical hoop-jumping. This involved creating an analogy between the number of draft picks and the volume of LPG usage, drawing parallels akin to a skilled point guard orchestrating plays on the court. Our approach was not merely about shooting statistical free throws; rather, it was about weaving a narrative that combined the art of basketball with the science of energy consumption. By employing this innovative method, we not only uncovered correlations but also elucidated the underlying dynamics between these seemingly disparate variables.

In conclusion, the methodology utilized in this research was a strategic blend of data collection, rigorous statistical analysis, and a touch of statistical hoop-jumping, all serving to unravel the curious connection between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the consumption of LPG in Guyana.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Boston Celtics' annual draft pick count and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Guyana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Basketball Refererence and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7488593, r-squared of 0.5607903, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Celtics Picks to Gas Leaks: A Correlation That's Nothin' But Net

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Guyana. Despite the apparent disparity between these two seemingly unrelated entities, our team sought to uncover any potential correlations lurking beneath the surface. By employing data from Basketball Reference and the Energy Information Administration, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7488593 and a significant level of p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on this unanticipated relationship but also highlight the importance of keeping an open mind when exploring statistical phenomena. This research serves as a lighthearted yet thought-provoking addition to the growing field of interdisciplinary connections.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of sports and the realm of energy usage may seem to exist in entirely separate universes, much like the Boston Celtics and the small South American nation of Guyana. Nevertheless, as the famous basketball coach Phil Jackson once said, "The strength of the team is each individual member. The strength of each member is the team." With this sentiment in mind, our team embarked on a journey to investigate whether a similar symbiotic relationship could be found between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Guyana.
While the Boston Celtics have been making moves on the court for decades, Guyana has quietly been consuming LPG for various domestic, commercial, and industrial purposes. The seemingly incongruous nature of these two entities piqued our curiosity, leading us to scrutinize their respective timelines and statistics for any sign of correlation.
In the following pages, we shall delve into the data, analyze the numbers, and perhaps even shoot some statistical three-pointers to shed light on this improbable association. Amidst the sea of serious scholarly endeavors, it's healthy to take a break and explore the unexpected, the absurd, and the seemingly impossible. As Mark Twain so aptly put it, "The secret source of humor is not joy but sorrow; there is no humor in heaven."
So join us as we traverse the intersection of basketball and gas consumption, where hoops meet heat and rebounds collide with releases of energy. Together, we shall unravel a correlation that's nothin' but net - quite literally. And who knows, we might just find that this connection, however bizarre, has more substance than the infamous "lucky bounce" in a game of basketball.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The findings of our investigation revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Guyana. The correlation coefficient of 0.7488593 signified a robust positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This unexpected connection left us pondering whether we had stumbled upon a statistical slam dunk or merely a fortuitous air ball in the world of research.

The r-squared value of 0.5607903 indicated that approximately 56.08% of the variation in LPG usage in Guyana could be explained by the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics. While this percentage might not constitute a full-court press in terms of explanatory power, it certainly signaled a noteworthy level of influence exerted by the draft pick count on LPG consumption.

The p-value of less than 0.01 underscored the statistical significance of the observed correlation, affirming that the likelihood of such a relationship occurring by random chance alone was exceedingly low. This result prompted us to contemplate the intriguing notion that, perhaps, there exists a cosmic convergence between the fate of basketball draft picks and the demand for LPG in a distant land.

Upon visual inspection, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) succinctly encapsulated the strength of the correlation, depicting a discernible pattern of association between the two variables. The clustered data points coalesced in a manner reminiscent of a well-executed play on the basketball court, excelling in its ability to convey the intricate interplay between Celtics draft picks and LPG consumption in Guyana.

In summary, the results of this study unearthed a surprising and substantial correlation between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Guyana, shedding light on an unexpected, yet undeniably intriguing, statistical phenomenon.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Boston Celtics' annual draft pick count and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Guyana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
From Celtics Picks to Gas Leaks: A Correlation That's Nothin' But Net

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Guyana. Despite the apparent disparity between these two seemingly unrelated entities, our team sought to uncover any potential correlations lurking beneath the surface. By employing data from Basketball Reference and the Energy Information Administration, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7488593 and a significant level of p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on this unanticipated relationship but also highlight the importance of keeping an open mind when exploring statistical phenomena. This research serves as a lighthearted yet thought-provoking addition to the growing field of interdisciplinary connections.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The correlation between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Guyana has been a subject of much speculation and interest among scholars. Early investigations by Smith (2005), Doe (2010), and Jones (2015) primarily focused on the statistical analysis of sports team performance and energy consumption patterns. These foundational studies set the stage for our research, as they laid bare the potential for unexpected connections between seemingly disparate domains.
Turning to non-fiction literature, books such as "Freakonomics" by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner and "Moneyball" by Michael Lewis have underscored the uncanny relationships that can emerge from analyzing unconventional data streams. Although these works primarily examine economics and sports, respectively, they have provided insights into the unorthodox pathways that can lead to surprising correlations.
In a somewhat surreal departure from the realm of non-fiction, authors such as Douglas Adams ("The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy"), Kurt Vonnegut ("Cat's Cradle"), and Haruki Murakami ("Kafka on the Shore") have crafted narratives that explore the absurd and the inexplicable. While their works may not directly address the correlation between basketball drafts and gas usage, they remind us of the boundless potential for unexpected connections in the universe.
Shifting our gaze from literature to cinema, the film "Space Jam" – a classic of the 1990s – seamlessly intertwines the worlds of basketball and animation, illustrating the unforeseen intersections that can occur in the most unlikely scenarios. The comedic escapades of Bugs Bunny and the earnest determination of Michael Jordan serve as a testament to the unanticipated pairings that may lurk beneath the surface of seemingly distinct realms.
In synthesizing these scholarly and cultural touchstones, our team endeavors to illuminate the mysterious threads that weave through the fabric of statistical phenomena. As we navigate the entwined worlds of sports drafts and energy consumption, we remain ever mindful of the potential for laughter, surprise, and, perhaps, a slam dunk of statistical correlation.

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our investigation revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Guyana. The correlation coefficient of 0.7488593 signified a robust positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This unexpected connection left us pondering whether we had stumbled upon a statistical slam dunk or merely a fortuitous air ball in the world of research.
The r-squared value of 0.5607903 indicated that approximately 56.08% of the variation in LPG usage in Guyana could be explained by the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics. While this percentage might not constitute a full-court press in terms of explanatory power, it certainly signaled a noteworthy level of influence exerted by the draft pick count on LPG consumption.
The p-value of less than 0.01 underscored the statistical significance of the observed correlation, affirming that the likelihood of such a relationship occurring by random chance alone was exceedingly low. This result prompted us to contemplate the intriguing notion that, perhaps, there exists a cosmic convergence between the fate of basketball draft picks and the demand for LPG in a distant land.
Upon visual inspection, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) succinctly encapsulated the strength of the correlation, depicting a discernible pattern of association between the two variables. The clustered data points coalesced in a manner reminiscent of a well-executed play on the basketball court, excelling in its ability to convey the intricate interplay between Celtics draft picks and LPG consumption in Guyana.
In summary, the results of this study unearthed a surprising and substantial correlation between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Guyana, shedding light on an unexpected, yet undeniably intriguing, statistical phenomenon.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The uncovering of a sizeable and statistically significant correlation between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Guyana marks a significant leap towards understanding the potential interplay between seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings not only bolster previous research by Smith (2005), Doe (2010), and Jones (2015) but also expand the scholarly discourse which has been predominately focused on more conventional correlations. It appears that our foray into the unexpected correlation between a storied basketball franchise and the energy needs of a South American nation has illuminated a truly remarkable connection, further solidifying the notion that statistical relationships often defy traditional expectations.

The r-squared value of 0.5607903, although not a full-court press in terms of explanatory power, indicates a noteworthy level of influence exerted by the draft pick count on LPG consumption. This finding aligns with the unorthodox pathways to surprising correlations highlighted in works such as "Freakonomics" and "Moneyball." While these literary references might seem like mere literary whimsy, they have ultimately proven prescient in guiding our investigation and interpretation of the results. Indeed, the uncanny relationships portrayed in these texts find an unexpected parallel in the correlation we have observed, affirming the unexpected convergence between basketball draft picks and LPG demand.

Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 lends further weight to the significance of the observed correlation. This outcome not only substantiates the robustness of the relationship but also prompts an amusing thought – namely, whether there might be a cosmic convergence between the fate of basketball draft picks and the demand for LPG in Guyana. As we consider such a whimsical notion, it is apparent that our findings have tapped into the surreal and capricious potential for unexpected connections, reminiscent of the absurdist narratives of Adams, Vonnegut, and Murakami.

The scatterplot depicting the relationship between Celtics draft picks and LPG consumption, which we likened to a well-executed play on the basketball court, humorously captures the intricate interplay between these variables. This visual representation not only conveys the strength of the correlation but also serves as a light-hearted homage to the comedic escapades of "Space Jam," underscoring the unforeseen intersections that can occur in the most unlikely scenarios.

In conclusion, our study has underscored the tantalizing and unexpected connection between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Guyana. This unlikely correlation serves as a reminder that, amid the rigors of scientific inquiry, there is always room for the unexpected, the serendipitous, and the downright amusing.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Boston Celtics' annual draft pick count and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Guyana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
From Celtics Picks to Gas Leaks: A Correlation That's Nothin' But Net

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing connection between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Guyana. Despite the apparent disparity between these two seemingly unrelated entities, our team sought to uncover any potential correlations lurking beneath the surface. By employing data from Basketball Reference and the Energy Information Administration, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7488593 and a significant level of p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on this unanticipated relationship but also highlight the importance of keeping an open mind when exploring statistical phenomena. This research serves as a lighthearted yet thought-provoking addition to the growing field of interdisciplinary connections.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of sports and the realm of energy usage may seem to exist in entirely separate universes, much like the Boston Celtics and the small South American nation of Guyana. Nevertheless, as the famous basketball coach Phil Jackson once said, "The strength of the team is each individual member. The strength of each member is the team." With this sentiment in mind, our team embarked on a journey to investigate whether a similar symbiotic relationship could be found between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Guyana.
While the Boston Celtics have been making moves on the court for decades, Guyana has quietly been consuming LPG for various domestic, commercial, and industrial purposes. The seemingly incongruous nature of these two entities piqued our curiosity, leading us to scrutinize their respective timelines and statistics for any sign of correlation.
In the following pages, we shall delve into the data, analyze the numbers, and perhaps even shoot some statistical three-pointers to shed light on this improbable association. Amidst the sea of serious scholarly endeavors, it's healthy to take a break and explore the unexpected, the absurd, and the seemingly impossible. As Mark Twain so aptly put it, "The secret source of humor is not joy but sorrow; there is no humor in heaven."
So join us as we traverse the intersection of basketball and gas consumption, where hoops meet heat and rebounds collide with releases of energy. Together, we shall unravel a correlation that's nothin' but net - quite literally. And who knows, we might just find that this connection, however bizarre, has more substance than the infamous "lucky bounce" in a game of basketball.

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our investigation revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Guyana. The correlation coefficient of 0.7488593 signified a robust positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This unexpected connection left us pondering whether we had stumbled upon a statistical slam dunk or merely a fortuitous air ball in the world of research.
The r-squared value of 0.5607903 indicated that approximately 56.08% of the variation in LPG usage in Guyana could be explained by the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics. While this percentage might not constitute a full-court press in terms of explanatory power, it certainly signaled a noteworthy level of influence exerted by the draft pick count on LPG consumption.
The p-value of less than 0.01 underscored the statistical significance of the observed correlation, affirming that the likelihood of such a relationship occurring by random chance alone was exceedingly low. This result prompted us to contemplate the intriguing notion that, perhaps, there exists a cosmic convergence between the fate of basketball draft picks and the demand for LPG in a distant land.
Upon visual inspection, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) succinctly encapsulated the strength of the correlation, depicting a discernible pattern of association between the two variables. The clustered data points coalesced in a manner reminiscent of a well-executed play on the basketball court, excelling in its ability to convey the intricate interplay between Celtics draft picks and LPG consumption in Guyana.
In summary, the results of this study unearthed a surprising and substantial correlation between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Guyana, shedding light on an unexpected, yet undeniably intriguing, statistical phenomenon.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the seemingly incongruous relationship between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Guyana has yielded insights that are as surprising as a half-court buzzer beater. The robust positive correlation coefficient of 0.7488593 suggests that there is more to this statistical dance than meets the eye, much like a player who appears unassuming but makes unparalleled contributions to the game.

The substantial r-squared value of 0.5607903 indicates that over half of the variation in LPG usage in Guyana can be explained by the annual draft pick count of the Celtics. It's as if the draft picks are setting screens and dishing out assists to the LPG consumption statistics, creating an unexpected synergy reminiscent of an unorthodox but effective play on the court.

We must acknowledge that while correlation does not imply causation, the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 leaves us with little doubt about the existence of this compelling connection. It's as if fate orchestrated a full-court press, bringing together these disparate entities in an unforeseen statistical embrace.

Despite the compelling nature of our findings, we must exercise caution in ascribing causality. It’s important to remember that correlation doesn’t imply a direct relationship. After all, we wouldn’t want to draft unsound conclusions like a team selecting a player based solely on their shoe size.

In light of these revelations, we are left to ponder the implications and applications of this unanticipated correlation. Could the Boston Celtics' draft picks be subtly influencing the demand for LPG in Guyana from across the oceans? Perhaps it's all just an instance of statistical serendipity, a cosmic convergence that defies conventional reasoning.

As we close this chapter on the peculiar correlation between Celtics draft picks and LPG usage in Guyana, it becomes abundantly clear that our findings have added a lighthearted yet thought-provoking dimension to the growing field of interdisciplinary connections. We have highlighted the importance of considering unconventional relationships, reminding us that even in the realm of statistics, surprises can be found where least expected.

Given the strength of our findings and the unorthodox nature of our subject matter, we assert that further research in this area is unnecessary. As they say in basketball, "You miss 100% of the shots you don't take," but in this case, we've hit nothing but net.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From Celtics Picks to Gas Leaks: A Correlation That's Nothin' But Net. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Correlations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From Celtics Picks to Gas Leaks: A Correlation That's Nothin' But Net. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Sports Analytics and Environmental Conservation


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From Celtics Picks to Gas Leaks: A Correlation That's Nothin' But Net with an abstract of This study delves into the intriguing connection between the annual draft pick count of the Boston Celtics and the usage of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Guyana. Despite the apparent disparity between these two seemingly unrelated entities, our team sought to uncover any potential correlations lurking beneath the surface. By employing data from Basketball Reference and the Energy Information Administration, we unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7488593 and a significant level of p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1980 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on this unanticipated relationship but also highlight the importance of keeping an open mind when exploring statistical phenomena. This research serves as a lighthearted yet thought-provoking addition to the growing field of interdisciplinary connections.

ChatGPT:

"Boston Celtics draft picks, LPG usage, correlation study," "Boston Celtics draft history, LPG consumption correlation," "Statistical relationship between Boston Celtics draft picks and LPG usage in Guyana," "Interdisciplinary connections between sports and energy consumption," "Correlation between NBA draft picks and energy patterns in Guyana," "Intriguing statistical connection: Boston Celtics picks and LPG in Guyana," "Unlikely correlation: Boston Celtics draft picks and LPG usage in Guyana," "Analyzing the correlation between Boston Celtics draft picks and LPG consumption," "Interdisciplinary study: Boston Celtics picks and LPG usage correlation," "Uncovering statistical coincidences: Boston Celtics draft picks and LPG in Guyana."

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Boston Celtics' annual draft pick count
Source: Basketball Refererence
See what else correlates with Boston Celtics' annual draft pick count

Liquefied petroleum gas used in Guyana
Detailed data title: Volume of liquefied petroleum gas used consumed in Guyana in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Liquefied petroleum gas used in Guyana

Correlation r = 0.7488593 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5607903 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 56.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Liquefied petroleum gas used in Guyana) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Boston Celtics' annual draft pick count) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.2E-8. 0.0000000117345287103634920000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.75 in 1.2E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 85,218,591 random variables You don't actually need 85 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.58, 0.86 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Boston Celtics' annual draft pick count (Picks)111110101065722112122231113134312212231261371552
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Guyana (Million Barrels/Day)1.085951.329731.030540.9197311.030541.052710.60.60.50.40.10.40.095340.095340.10.20.20.20.20.1997670.2535380.2736710.294290.356960.3369050.348690.2974840.3665630.4172690.4317420.5592530.4913270.5021370.5084930.5133030.5387710.5716720.5402470.6673970.6673970.667397




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([11,11,10,10,10,6,5,7,2,2,1,1,2,1,2,2,2,3,1,1,1,3,1,3,4,3,1,2,2,1,2,2,3,1,2,6,13,7,1,5,5,2,])
array_2 = np.array([1.08595,1.32973,1.03054,0.919731,1.03054,1.0527,1,0.6,0.6,0.5,0.4,0.1,0.4,0.09534,0.09534,0.1,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.199767,0.253538,0.273671,0.29429,0.35696,0.336905,0.34869,0.297484,0.366563,0.417269,0.431742,0.559253,0.491327,0.502137,0.508493,0.513303,0.538771,0.571672,0.540247,0.667397,0.667397,0.667397,])
array_1_name = "Boston Celtics' annual draft pick count"
array_2_name = "Liquefied petroleum gas used in Guyana"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 3877 · Black Variable ID: 248 · Red Variable ID: 24505
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0