Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the name Miles gained popularity, more parents were subconsciously inclined to take their children on road trips, leading to an unexpected surge in demand for gas. This sudden spike in gas consumption prompted Spain to invest heavily in solar power as a clean energy alternative, inadvertently boosting solar power generated in the country. Remember, sometimes the sun shines brighter on a name!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that looks like a scene from a Disney movie depicting a sunny day in Spain with countless solar panels installed across the landscape, soaking up the abundant sunshine. In the midst of it all, a group of people are using solar-powered GPS devices to measure distances and track their movements. Meanwhile, a child named Miles plays nearby, his name echoing the growing popularity as more and more parents choose it for their little ones. The scene should exude a joyful and vibrant atmosphere, capturing the beauty of the Spanish countryside and the sustainable energy of the solar panels. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Miles and Solar power generated in Spain. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Oragami Whimsical illustration An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie inspired by bauhaus Charcoal
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Miles and Solar power generated in Spain, in the following situation: Because as the name Miles gains popularity, more people have started measuring distances using solar-powered GPS devices, boosting Spain's capacity for solar energy production.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A sunny day in Spain with countless solar panels installed across the landscape, soaking up the abundant sunshine. In the midst of it all, a group of people are using solar-powered GPS devices to measure distances and track their movements. Meanwhile, a child named Miles plays nearby, his name echoing the growing popularity as more and more parents choose it for their little ones.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie ] and depicting this scene: A sunny day in Spain with countless solar panels installed across the landscape, soaking up the abundant sunshine. In the midst of it all, a group of people are using solar-powered GPS devices to measure distances and track their movements. Meanwhile, a child named Miles plays nearby, his name echoing the growing popularity as more and more parents choose it for their little ones. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that looks like a scene from a Disney movie depicting a sunny day in Spain with countless solar panels installed across the landscape, soaking up the abundant sunshine. In the midst of it all, a group of people are using solar-powered GPS devices to measure distances and track their movements. Meanwhile, a child named Miles plays nearby, his name echoing the growing popularity as more and more parents choose it for their little ones. The scene should exude a joyful and vibrant atmosphere, capturing the beauty of the Spanish countryside and the sustainable energy of the solar panels.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Miles caused Solar power generated in Spain to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.
AI academic paper
Marvelous Miles: Merit of Moniker Meets Solar Sirens in Spain The Journal of Astrological Anomalies Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Miles and Solar power generated in Spain. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title an alliteration.
Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9659750 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Marvelous Miles: Merit of Moniker Meets Solar Sirens in Spain
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a compelling case study investigating the uncanny correlation between the popularity of the first name "Miles" and the solar power generated in the sunny country of Spain. Drawing upon data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to shed light on this peculiar relationship.
The findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9659750 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021. This discovery suggests that there may be more than meets the eye when it comes to the name "Miles" and its influence on the solar energy landscape in Spain. While causation cannot be definitively inferred from these results, the correlation is undeniably striking and prompts further investigation into the potential role of nomenclature in renewable energy production.
Through our thorough examination, we hope to inspire further research in the burgeoning field of nominative determinism in the context of sustainable energy sources. The implications of our study extend beyond the boundaries of traditional statistical analyses, beckoning researchers to contemplate the whimsical interplay of human nomenclature and environmental phenomena.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Miles and Solar power generated in Spain. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Marvelous Miles: Merit of Moniker Meets Solar Sirens in Spain
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a compelling case study investigating the uncanny correlation between the popularity of the first name "Miles" and the solar power generated in the sunny country of Spain. Drawing upon data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to shed light on this peculiar relationship.
The findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9659750 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021. This discovery suggests that there may be more than meets the eye when it comes to the name "Miles" and its influence on the solar energy landscape in Spain. While causation cannot be definitively inferred from these results, the correlation is undeniably striking and prompts further investigation into the potential role of nomenclature in renewable energy production.
Through our thorough examination, we hope to inspire further research in the burgeoning field of nominative determinism in the context of sustainable energy sources. The implications of our study extend beyond the boundaries of traditional statistical analyses, beckoning researchers to contemplate the whimsical interplay of human nomenclature and environmental phenomena.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of statistical exploration, it is a rare treat to stumble upon an unexpected connection that seems to defy conventional reasoning. One such phenomenon that has piqued our curiosity is the association between the popularity of the first name "Miles" and the solar power output in the picturesque land of Spain. While it may at first appear to be a chance occurrence, our investigation delves into the depths of data to unravel this curious correlation that beckons us to contemplate the role of nomenclature in the realm of renewable energy.
As peculiar as it sounds, the concept of nominative determinism has long been a subject of jest and speculation in scientific circles, leading to pun-laden banter about the power of names. However, as we embark on this investigation, we do not aim to simply entertain fanciful notions; rather, we endeavor to harness the power of statistics to shed light on the potential influence of a name on the solar energy landscape. In doing so, we endeavor to marry the whimsy of nomenclature with the precision of quantitative analysis, creating a harmonious blend of levity and rigor in our scholarly pursuits.
The genesis of this study arose from the intersection of two seemingly disparate spheres: the domain of demography, encapsulated by the ebb and flow of popular given names, and the realm of renewable energy, characterized by the dance of photons and electrons. As we embark on this journey, we are accompanied by a sense of wonder, marveling at the possibility of uncovering a correlation that transcends the boundaries of conventional expectation. Indeed, the fusion of mirth and mathematical acumen guides us on this scholarly escapade, urging us to embrace the unexpected and relish the quirks that emerge from the tapestry of data.
With ardent enthusiasm and a hint of whimsy, we delve into the heart of this peculiar juxtaposition, poised to unravel the enigmatic association between the name "Miles" and the solar sirens that beckon from the radiant landscapes of Spain. As we unravel this conundrum, we invite our fellow scholars to join us in this merry pursuit, as we seek to illuminate the potential nuances of nominative determinism in the context of sustainable energy sources.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Miles and Solar power generated in Spain. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Marvelous Miles: Merit of Moniker Meets Solar Sirens in Spain
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a compelling case study investigating the uncanny correlation between the popularity of the first name "Miles" and the solar power generated in the sunny country of Spain. Drawing upon data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to shed light on this peculiar relationship.
The findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9659750 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021. This discovery suggests that there may be more than meets the eye when it comes to the name "Miles" and its influence on the solar energy landscape in Spain. While causation cannot be definitively inferred from these results, the correlation is undeniably striking and prompts further investigation into the potential role of nomenclature in renewable energy production.
Through our thorough examination, we hope to inspire further research in the burgeoning field of nominative determinism in the context of sustainable energy sources. The implications of our study extend beyond the boundaries of traditional statistical analyses, beckoning researchers to contemplate the whimsical interplay of human nomenclature and environmental phenomena.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of statistical exploration, it is a rare treat to stumble upon an unexpected connection that seems to defy conventional reasoning. One such phenomenon that has piqued our curiosity is the association between the popularity of the first name "Miles" and the solar power output in the picturesque land of Spain. While it may at first appear to be a chance occurrence, our investigation delves into the depths of data to unravel this curious correlation that beckons us to contemplate the role of nomenclature in the realm of renewable energy.
As peculiar as it sounds, the concept of nominative determinism has long been a subject of jest and speculation in scientific circles, leading to pun-laden banter about the power of names. However, as we embark on this investigation, we do not aim to simply entertain fanciful notions; rather, we endeavor to harness the power of statistics to shed light on the potential influence of a name on the solar energy landscape. In doing so, we endeavor to marry the whimsy of nomenclature with the precision of quantitative analysis, creating a harmonious blend of levity and rigor in our scholarly pursuits.
The genesis of this study arose from the intersection of two seemingly disparate spheres: the domain of demography, encapsulated by the ebb and flow of popular given names, and the realm of renewable energy, characterized by the dance of photons and electrons. As we embark on this journey, we are accompanied by a sense of wonder, marveling at the possibility of uncovering a correlation that transcends the boundaries of conventional expectation. Indeed, the fusion of mirth and mathematical acumen guides us on this scholarly escapade, urging us to embrace the unexpected and relish the quirks that emerge from the tapestry of data.
With ardent enthusiasm and a hint of whimsy, we delve into the heart of this peculiar juxtaposition, poised to unravel the enigmatic association between the name "Miles" and the solar sirens that beckon from the radiant landscapes of Spain. As we unravel this conundrum, we invite our fellow scholars to join us in this merry pursuit, as we seek to illuminate the potential nuances of nominative determinism in the context of sustainable energy sources.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between the popularity of the first name "Miles" and the solar power generated in Spain has elicited considerable scholarly interest in recent years. Smith, in their seminal work "Names and Numbers," delves into the intersection of personal monikers and societal trends, laying the groundwork for our investigation. Doe, in their comprehensive study "The Solar Saga: A Statistical Odyssey," outlines the intricate web of factors influencing solar energy production, offering a backdrop against which the peculiar correlation at hand can be examined. Jones, in "The Power of Names: A Nomenclatural Inquiry," wittily explores the potential influence of names on human behavior and social phenomena, setting the stage for our quirky inquiry.
Turning to broader literature, "Solar Energy for Dummies" by Greene provides a comprehensive overview of solar energy production, albeit without delving into the whimsical realm of nomenclature. On a similar note, "The Name Game: A Linguistic Odyssey" by Wordplay offers a lighthearted exploration of names and their cultural significance but does not directly address their potential impact on environmental variables. Over in the realm of fiction, "Solaris" by Lem and "The Sun Also Rises" by Hemingway present fictitious contemplations of solar phenomena, offering a tangential but not directly relevant exploration of our topic.
Personal anecdotal experiences also play a role in shaping the context of this investigation. Having watched "Sunshine" and "Solar Babies" multiple times, the authors have found themselves contemplating the interplay of solar power and unforeseen influences, leading to delightful conjectures and humorous ponderings on the connection between cinematic narratives and empirical data.
In sum, while the bulk of the literature leans towards the serious examination of solar energy and naming trends, a touch of whimsy and levity often find their way into scholarly pursuits, creating an atmosphere of scholarly mirth and statistical rigor. As we progress in our investigation, we take heed of both the serious and the lighthearted to illuminate the nuanced relationship between nomenclature and renewable energy sources.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Miles and Solar power generated in Spain. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1990 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Marvelous Miles: Merit of Moniker Meets Solar Sirens in Spain
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a compelling case study investigating the uncanny correlation between the popularity of the first name "Miles" and the solar power generated in the sunny country of Spain. Drawing upon data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to shed light on this peculiar relationship.
The findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9659750 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021. This discovery suggests that there may be more than meets the eye when it comes to the name "Miles" and its influence on the solar energy landscape in Spain. While causation cannot be definitively inferred from these results, the correlation is undeniably striking and prompts further investigation into the potential role of nomenclature in renewable energy production.
Through our thorough examination, we hope to inspire further research in the burgeoning field of nominative determinism in the context of sustainable energy sources. The implications of our study extend beyond the boundaries of traditional statistical analyses, beckoning researchers to contemplate the whimsical interplay of human nomenclature and environmental phenomena.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of statistical exploration, it is a rare treat to stumble upon an unexpected connection that seems to defy conventional reasoning. One such phenomenon that has piqued our curiosity is the association between the popularity of the first name "Miles" and the solar power output in the picturesque land of Spain. While it may at first appear to be a chance occurrence, our investigation delves into the depths of data to unravel this curious correlation that beckons us to contemplate the role of nomenclature in the realm of renewable energy.
As peculiar as it sounds, the concept of nominative determinism has long been a subject of jest and speculation in scientific circles, leading to pun-laden banter about the power of names. However, as we embark on this investigation, we do not aim to simply entertain fanciful notions; rather, we endeavor to harness the power of statistics to shed light on the potential influence of a name on the solar energy landscape. In doing so, we endeavor to marry the whimsy of nomenclature with the precision of quantitative analysis, creating a harmonious blend of levity and rigor in our scholarly pursuits.
The genesis of this study arose from the intersection of two seemingly disparate spheres: the domain of demography, encapsulated by the ebb and flow of popular given names, and the realm of renewable energy, characterized by the dance of photons and electrons. As we embark on this journey, we are accompanied by a sense of wonder, marveling at the possibility of uncovering a correlation that transcends the boundaries of conventional expectation. Indeed, the fusion of mirth and mathematical acumen guides us on this scholarly escapade, urging us to embrace the unexpected and relish the quirks that emerge from the tapestry of data.
With ardent enthusiasm and a hint of whimsy, we delve into the heart of this peculiar juxtaposition, poised to unravel the enigmatic association between the name "Miles" and the solar sirens that beckon from the radiant landscapes of Spain. As we unravel this conundrum, we invite our fellow scholars to join us in this merry pursuit, as we seek to illuminate the potential nuances of nominative determinism in the context of sustainable energy sources.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To unravel the mysterious entanglement of the name "Miles" and the solar prowess of Spain, the research team embarked on a convoluted yet captivating journey through the annals of data collection and statistical analysis. The quest for clarity commenced with the procurement of historical data regarding the popularity of the moniker "Miles" from the US Social Security Administration. This treasure trove of nomenclatural information spanned the years 1990 to 2021 and provided a robust foundation for understanding the temporal dynamics of this august appellation.
On the parallel path, our intrepid team sought the radiant rays of insight within the bastion of solar energy production in Spain, drawing upon data meticulously curated by the Energy Information Administration. This reservoir of renewable energy statistics encapsulated the solar power generated in the sun-drenched landscapes of Spain over the same period as our nomenclatural endeavor.
With these two venerable sources of information in hand, the convergence of quantitative analysis became our lodestar. Employing a multifaceted approach, we first adorned our statistical palette with the tantalizing hues of correlation analysis. To gauge the degree of association between the popularity of "Miles" and solar power generation in Spain, we calculated the Pearson correlation coefficient with its trusty sidekick, the p-value.
Fueled by our unyielding quest for knowledge, we then unleashed the powers of time series analysis to unravel the temporal nuances of this enigmatic relationship. Through the wizardry of autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models, we sought to discern hints of causality and directionality within this whimsical interplay of nomenclature and photonic dynamism.
Moreover, to assuage any lingering doubts and to unravel the nuances of potential confounding variables, we engaged in multiple regression analysis, acquainting ourselves intimately with the dance of coefficient estimation and hypothesis testing. This meticulous exploration allowed us to evaluate the influence of other factors on solar power generation in Spain, safeguarding our findings from the shadows of spurious correlations and lurking statistical specters.
In a nod to the duality of our pursuit, we also ventured into the domain of sentiment analysis, harnessing the emergent field of computational linguistics to discern the emotional tenor surrounding the name "Miles" and its potential impact on the solar vistas of Spain. This whimsical excursion offered a lighthearted divergence from the rigors of quantitative analysis, inviting us to introspect on the romanticism of nomenclature in the digital age.
As our foray into the realm of data came to a close, we emerged with a bouquet of statistical revelations and a smattering of pun-riddled anecdotes, each one illuminating the curious intersection of human nomenclature and environmental phenomena. Armed with these insights, we present our findings with mirth and mathematical acumen, beckoning fellow scholars to accompany us on this merry exploration of the marvelous and the mundane.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Miles and Solar power generated in Spain. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration .
For the time period 1990 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9659750, r-squared of 0.9331077, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Marvelous Miles: Merit of Moniker Meets Solar Sirens in Spain
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a compelling case study investigating the uncanny correlation between the popularity of the first name "Miles" and the solar power generated in the sunny country of Spain. Drawing upon data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to shed light on this peculiar relationship.
The findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9659750 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021. This discovery suggests that there may be more than meets the eye when it comes to the name "Miles" and its influence on the solar energy landscape in Spain. While causation cannot be definitively inferred from these results, the correlation is undeniably striking and prompts further investigation into the potential role of nomenclature in renewable energy production.
Through our thorough examination, we hope to inspire further research in the burgeoning field of nominative determinism in the context of sustainable energy sources. The implications of our study extend beyond the boundaries of traditional statistical analyses, beckoning researchers to contemplate the whimsical interplay of human nomenclature and environmental phenomena.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of statistical exploration, it is a rare treat to stumble upon an unexpected connection that seems to defy conventional reasoning. One such phenomenon that has piqued our curiosity is the association between the popularity of the first name "Miles" and the solar power output in the picturesque land of Spain. While it may at first appear to be a chance occurrence, our investigation delves into the depths of data to unravel this curious correlation that beckons us to contemplate the role of nomenclature in the realm of renewable energy.
As peculiar as it sounds, the concept of nominative determinism has long been a subject of jest and speculation in scientific circles, leading to pun-laden banter about the power of names. However, as we embark on this investigation, we do not aim to simply entertain fanciful notions; rather, we endeavor to harness the power of statistics to shed light on the potential influence of a name on the solar energy landscape. In doing so, we endeavor to marry the whimsy of nomenclature with the precision of quantitative analysis, creating a harmonious blend of levity and rigor in our scholarly pursuits.
The genesis of this study arose from the intersection of two seemingly disparate spheres: the domain of demography, encapsulated by the ebb and flow of popular given names, and the realm of renewable energy, characterized by the dance of photons and electrons. As we embark on this journey, we are accompanied by a sense of wonder, marveling at the possibility of uncovering a correlation that transcends the boundaries of conventional expectation. Indeed, the fusion of mirth and mathematical acumen guides us on this scholarly escapade, urging us to embrace the unexpected and relish the quirks that emerge from the tapestry of data.
With ardent enthusiasm and a hint of whimsy, we delve into the heart of this peculiar juxtaposition, poised to unravel the enigmatic association between the name "Miles" and the solar sirens that beckon from the radiant landscapes of Spain. As we unravel this conundrum, we invite our fellow scholars to join us in this merry pursuit, as we seek to illuminate the potential nuances of nominative determinism in the context of sustainable energy sources.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation yielded a coefficient of correlation (r) of 0.9659750 between the popularity of the first name "Miles" and the solar power generated in Spain from 1990 to 2021. This coefficient signifies a remarkably strong positive relationship between the frequency of the name "Miles" and the solar energy output in the sun-drenched environs of Spain. The striking magnitude of this correlation beckons us to contemplate the potential influence of nomenclature on the renewable energy landscape.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9331077 suggests that approximately 93.3% of the variance in solar power generation in Spain can be explained by the popularity of the name "Miles." This finding not only underscores the robustness of the relationship but also highlights the substantial explanatory power of the given moniker in the context of solar energy production. It appears that the name "Miles" not only resonates with parents seeking a melodic appellation for their offspring but also exerts a palpable impact on the solar energy dynamics in Spain.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters the statistical significance of our findings, indicating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to be a result of random chance. As statisticians, we are accustomed to scrutinizing mounds of data in search of meaningful patterns, and the discovery of such a substantial correlation is akin to finding a shining beacon amidst the statistical seas.
In Figure 1, a scatterplot visually encapsulates the robust correlation between the frequency of the name "Miles" and the solar power generated in Spain. The plot serves as a testament to the pronounced relationship uncovered in our analysis, captivating the viewer with the unmistakable alignment of data points that traverse the landscape of solar energy and nomenclature.
In consideration of these findings, we are reminded of the sage adage that "there are more solar connections in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in our statistics," for the enigmatic correspondence between the name "Miles" and solar power in Spain evokes a sense of wonder and curiosity that transcends the realm of conventional statistical inquiry. As we unravel this peculiar nexus, we are prompted to pause and marvel at the unexpected symphony that unfolds when human nomenclature and solar phenomena converge in the tapestry of empirical observation.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Miles and Solar power generated in Spain. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Marvelous Miles: Merit of Moniker Meets Solar Sirens in Spain
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a compelling case study investigating the uncanny correlation between the popularity of the first name "Miles" and the solar power generated in the sunny country of Spain. Drawing upon data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to shed light on this peculiar relationship.
The findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9659750 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021. This discovery suggests that there may be more than meets the eye when it comes to the name "Miles" and its influence on the solar energy landscape in Spain. While causation cannot be definitively inferred from these results, the correlation is undeniably striking and prompts further investigation into the potential role of nomenclature in renewable energy production.
Through our thorough examination, we hope to inspire further research in the burgeoning field of nominative determinism in the context of sustainable energy sources. The implications of our study extend beyond the boundaries of traditional statistical analyses, beckoning researchers to contemplate the whimsical interplay of human nomenclature and environmental phenomena.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between the popularity of the first name "Miles" and the solar power generated in Spain has elicited considerable scholarly interest in recent years. Smith, in their seminal work "Names and Numbers," delves into the intersection of personal monikers and societal trends, laying the groundwork for our investigation. Doe, in their comprehensive study "The Solar Saga: A Statistical Odyssey," outlines the intricate web of factors influencing solar energy production, offering a backdrop against which the peculiar correlation at hand can be examined. Jones, in "The Power of Names: A Nomenclatural Inquiry," wittily explores the potential influence of names on human behavior and social phenomena, setting the stage for our quirky inquiry.
Turning to broader literature, "Solar Energy for Dummies" by Greene provides a comprehensive overview of solar energy production, albeit without delving into the whimsical realm of nomenclature. On a similar note, "The Name Game: A Linguistic Odyssey" by Wordplay offers a lighthearted exploration of names and their cultural significance but does not directly address their potential impact on environmental variables. Over in the realm of fiction, "Solaris" by Lem and "The Sun Also Rises" by Hemingway present fictitious contemplations of solar phenomena, offering a tangential but not directly relevant exploration of our topic.
Personal anecdotal experiences also play a role in shaping the context of this investigation. Having watched "Sunshine" and "Solar Babies" multiple times, the authors have found themselves contemplating the interplay of solar power and unforeseen influences, leading to delightful conjectures and humorous ponderings on the connection between cinematic narratives and empirical data.
In sum, while the bulk of the literature leans towards the serious examination of solar energy and naming trends, a touch of whimsy and levity often find their way into scholarly pursuits, creating an atmosphere of scholarly mirth and statistical rigor. As we progress in our investigation, we take heed of both the serious and the lighthearted to illuminate the nuanced relationship between nomenclature and renewable energy sources.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation yielded a coefficient of correlation (r) of 0.9659750 between the popularity of the first name "Miles" and the solar power generated in Spain from 1990 to 2021. This coefficient signifies a remarkably strong positive relationship between the frequency of the name "Miles" and the solar energy output in the sun-drenched environs of Spain. The striking magnitude of this correlation beckons us to contemplate the potential influence of nomenclature on the renewable energy landscape.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9331077 suggests that approximately 93.3% of the variance in solar power generation in Spain can be explained by the popularity of the name "Miles." This finding not only underscores the robustness of the relationship but also highlights the substantial explanatory power of the given moniker in the context of solar energy production. It appears that the name "Miles" not only resonates with parents seeking a melodic appellation for their offspring but also exerts a palpable impact on the solar energy dynamics in Spain.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters the statistical significance of our findings, indicating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to be a result of random chance. As statisticians, we are accustomed to scrutinizing mounds of data in search of meaningful patterns, and the discovery of such a substantial correlation is akin to finding a shining beacon amidst the statistical seas.
In Figure 1, a scatterplot visually encapsulates the robust correlation between the frequency of the name "Miles" and the solar power generated in Spain. The plot serves as a testament to the pronounced relationship uncovered in our analysis, captivating the viewer with the unmistakable alignment of data points that traverse the landscape of solar energy and nomenclature.
In consideration of these findings, we are reminded of the sage adage that "there are more solar connections in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in our statistics," for the enigmatic correspondence between the name "Miles" and solar power in Spain evokes a sense of wonder and curiosity that transcends the realm of conventional statistical inquiry. As we unravel this peculiar nexus, we are prompted to pause and marvel at the unexpected symphony that unfolds when human nomenclature and solar phenomena converge in the tapestry of empirical observation.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The astoundingly high correlation coefficient obtained in our study serves as a testament to the peculiar nexus between the popularity of the first name "Miles" and the solar power generated in Spain. As we dare to tread into this whimsical realm of statistical exploration, we find ourselves confronted with the perplexing question of whether there exists a cosmic harmony between nomenclature and renewable energy dynamics.
Our findings align with the prior scholarship in unexpected ways, echoing the resonant musings of Smith, Doe, and Jones as they whimsically pondered the potential influence of names on societal phenomena. The delightful insights gleaned from the literature review, tinged with scholarly mirth and nomenclatural intrigue, inform our appreciation of the uncanny relationship between the name "Miles" and the solar siren call of Spain. The profound implications of this study beckon us to contemplate the enigmatic interplay of human nomenclature and environmental variables, inviting further inquiry into the mystical intersection of monikers and renewable energy production.
The robustness of the correlation, as evidenced by the coefficient of determination, signifies the substantial explanatory power of the name "Miles" in unraveling the variance in solar power generation. Just as the sun casts its radiant glow upon the earth, the moniker "Miles" appears to cast a luminous influence over the solar energy landscape in Spain, illuminating the statistical seas with its captivating resonance.
While it may be tempting to ascribe mystical forces to this puzzling correlation, we must temper our enthusiasm with the prudent reminder that correlation does not imply causation. Nevertheless, the ritual of statistical inquiry compels us to scrutinize the data with requisite caution, akin to detectives unraveling a cosmic mystery. The statistical significance of our findings, underscored by the p-value, illuminates the tangible nature of this correlation, prompting us to acknowledge the remarkable rarity of such an observed relationship.
In contemplating the unexpected symphony of nomenclature and solar dynamics, we must not overlook the delightful interplay of empirical observation and scholarly imagination. As the witticisms of the literature review resonate in the halls of statistical inquiry, we are reminded that statistical research need not be devoid of lighthearted whimsy and scholarly mirth. In this vein, we are prompted to marvel at the evocative tapestry that unfolds when human nomenclature takes center stage in the grand theater of statistical exploration.
The striking convergence of the name "Miles" and solar power in Spain presents a whimsical enigma that beckons researchers to venture further into the realm of nominative determinism. The implications of our study extend beyond the conventional boundaries of statistical inquiry, inviting scholars to embrace the unexpected and amuse themselves with the delightful choreography of names and environmental phenomena. As we conclude this discussion, we are reminded that statistical inquiry is not devoid of enchantment and humor, and that the enigmatic dance of nomenclature and solar phenomena continues to captivate our scholarly imagination.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Miles and Solar power generated in Spain. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Marvelous Miles: Merit of Moniker Meets Solar Sirens in Spain
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a compelling case study investigating the uncanny correlation between the popularity of the first name "Miles" and the solar power generated in the sunny country of Spain. Drawing upon data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to shed light on this peculiar relationship.
The findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9659750 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021. This discovery suggests that there may be more than meets the eye when it comes to the name "Miles" and its influence on the solar energy landscape in Spain. While causation cannot be definitively inferred from these results, the correlation is undeniably striking and prompts further investigation into the potential role of nomenclature in renewable energy production.
Through our thorough examination, we hope to inspire further research in the burgeoning field of nominative determinism in the context of sustainable energy sources. The implications of our study extend beyond the boundaries of traditional statistical analyses, beckoning researchers to contemplate the whimsical interplay of human nomenclature and environmental phenomena.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of statistical exploration, it is a rare treat to stumble upon an unexpected connection that seems to defy conventional reasoning. One such phenomenon that has piqued our curiosity is the association between the popularity of the first name "Miles" and the solar power output in the picturesque land of Spain. While it may at first appear to be a chance occurrence, our investigation delves into the depths of data to unravel this curious correlation that beckons us to contemplate the role of nomenclature in the realm of renewable energy.
As peculiar as it sounds, the concept of nominative determinism has long been a subject of jest and speculation in scientific circles, leading to pun-laden banter about the power of names. However, as we embark on this investigation, we do not aim to simply entertain fanciful notions; rather, we endeavor to harness the power of statistics to shed light on the potential influence of a name on the solar energy landscape. In doing so, we endeavor to marry the whimsy of nomenclature with the precision of quantitative analysis, creating a harmonious blend of levity and rigor in our scholarly pursuits.
The genesis of this study arose from the intersection of two seemingly disparate spheres: the domain of demography, encapsulated by the ebb and flow of popular given names, and the realm of renewable energy, characterized by the dance of photons and electrons. As we embark on this journey, we are accompanied by a sense of wonder, marveling at the possibility of uncovering a correlation that transcends the boundaries of conventional expectation. Indeed, the fusion of mirth and mathematical acumen guides us on this scholarly escapade, urging us to embrace the unexpected and relish the quirks that emerge from the tapestry of data.
With ardent enthusiasm and a hint of whimsy, we delve into the heart of this peculiar juxtaposition, poised to unravel the enigmatic association between the name "Miles" and the solar sirens that beckon from the radiant landscapes of Spain. As we unravel this conundrum, we invite our fellow scholars to join us in this merry pursuit, as we seek to illuminate the potential nuances of nominative determinism in the context of sustainable energy sources.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation yielded a coefficient of correlation (r) of 0.9659750 between the popularity of the first name "Miles" and the solar power generated in Spain from 1990 to 2021. This coefficient signifies a remarkably strong positive relationship between the frequency of the name "Miles" and the solar energy output in the sun-drenched environs of Spain. The striking magnitude of this correlation beckons us to contemplate the potential influence of nomenclature on the renewable energy landscape.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9331077 suggests that approximately 93.3% of the variance in solar power generation in Spain can be explained by the popularity of the name "Miles." This finding not only underscores the robustness of the relationship but also highlights the substantial explanatory power of the given moniker in the context of solar energy production. It appears that the name "Miles" not only resonates with parents seeking a melodic appellation for their offspring but also exerts a palpable impact on the solar energy dynamics in Spain.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters the statistical significance of our findings, indicating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to be a result of random chance. As statisticians, we are accustomed to scrutinizing mounds of data in search of meaningful patterns, and the discovery of such a substantial correlation is akin to finding a shining beacon amidst the statistical seas.
In Figure 1, a scatterplot visually encapsulates the robust correlation between the frequency of the name "Miles" and the solar power generated in Spain. The plot serves as a testament to the pronounced relationship uncovered in our analysis, captivating the viewer with the unmistakable alignment of data points that traverse the landscape of solar energy and nomenclature.
In consideration of these findings, we are reminded of the sage adage that "there are more solar connections in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in our statistics," for the enigmatic correspondence between the name "Miles" and solar power in Spain evokes a sense of wonder and curiosity that transcends the realm of conventional statistical inquiry. As we unravel this peculiar nexus, we are prompted to pause and marvel at the unexpected symphony that unfolds when human nomenclature and solar phenomena converge in the tapestry of empirical observation.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Miles" and the solar power generated in Spain has yielded compelling results that beckon us to ponder the whimsical interplay of nomenclature and environmental dynamics. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9659750 and the substantial coefficient of determination of 0.9331077 highlight the remarkable relationship between the moniker "Miles" and the solar energy landscape. It seems that the name "Miles" not only resonates melodically but also exerts a palpable influence on solar energy production. This unexpected synergy between human nomenclature and renewable energy sources showcases the delightful surprises that await us in the world of statistics.
As we draw the curtain on this mirthful escapade of statistical inquiry, we are reminded of the lighthearted banter that reverberates in scientific circles, inevitably leading to playful puns and jests about the power of names. Nevertheless, beneath the veneer of humor lies a nugget of curiosity that propels us to uncover unconventional connections and ponder the underlying mechanisms. While we approach this subject with a dash of levity, the strength of the correlation and the steadfastness of the statistical evidence compel us to contemplate the potential implications of nominative determinism in the arena of renewable energy.
Our findings not only tantalize the intellect but also add a touch of merriment to the discerning eye, reminding us that even in the most empirical pursuits, there is room for whimsy and revelry. Thus, we bid adieu to this particular exploration, content in our findings and with a renewed appreciation for the delightful surprises that science and statistics unveil. With a sprinkle of statistical stardust and a generous dose of mirth, we declare that further research into the connection between the first name "Miles" and solar power in Spain might be akin to chasing shadows on a sunny day. As such, we assert that no further pursuit in this avenue is warranted, for the quirky nature of this correlation has been suitably illuminated.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Marvelous Miles: Merit of Moniker Meets Solar Sirens in Spain. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Astrological Anomalies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Marvelous Miles: Merit of Moniker Meets Solar Sirens in Spain. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
Global Solar Research Consortium
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Marvelous Miles: Merit of Moniker Meets Solar Sirens in Spain with an abstract of In this paper, we present a compelling case study investigating the uncanny correlation between the popularity of the first name "Miles" and the solar power generated in the sunny country of Spain. Drawing upon data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to shed light on this peculiar relationship.
The findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9659750 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021. This discovery suggests that there may be more than meets the eye when it comes to the name "Miles" and its influence on the solar energy landscape in Spain. While causation cannot be definitively inferred from these results, the correlation is undeniably striking and prompts further investigation into the potential role of nomenclature in renewable energy production.
Through our thorough examination, we hope to inspire further research in the burgeoning field of nominative determinism in the context of sustainable energy sources. The implications of our study extend beyond the boundaries of traditional statistical analyses, beckoning researchers to contemplate the whimsical interplay of human nomenclature and environmental phenomena.
ChatGPT:
"Miles" popularity, solar power correlation, Spain, correlation coefficient, statistical analysis, US Social Security Administration data, Energy Information Administration data, nomenclature, renewable energy production, nominative determinism, sustainable energy sources
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Popularity of the first name MilesDetailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Miles
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Miles
Solar power generated in Spain
Detailed data title: Total solar power generated in Spain in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Solar power generated in Spain
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9331077 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Solar power generated in Spain) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Miles) over the 32 years from 1990 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.6E-19. 0.0000000000000000003584814368
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 3.6E-17% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,789,544,722,110,419,968 random variables You don't actually need 2 quintillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 31 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 31 because we have two variables measured over a period of 32 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.93, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
Popularity of the first name Miles (Babies born) | 993 | 988 | 1028 | 1072 | 948 | 799 | 829 | 943 | 1181 | 1053 | 1310 | 1384 | 1422 | 1519 | 1589 | 1762 | 1938 | 2141 | 2366 | 2410 | 2879 | 3364 | 3278 | 3428 | 3706 | 3750 | 3753 | 3642 | 4009 | 4899 | 5302 | 5734 |
Solar power generated in Spain (Billion kWh) | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.008 | 0.009 | 0.01 | 0.015 | 0.012 | 0.013 | 0.015 | 0.017 | 0.018 | 0.024 | 0.03 | 0.041 | 0.056 | 0.041 | 0.119 | 0.508 | 2.578 | 6.064 | 7.117 | 9.221 | 11.625 | 12.662 | 13.177 | 13.351 | 13.051 | 13.778 | 12.224 | 14.493 | 20.058 | 25.938 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([993,988,1028,1072,948,799,829,943,1181,1053,1310,1384,1422,1519,1589,1762,1938,2141,2366,2410,2879,3364,3278,3428,3706,3750,3753,3642,4009,4899,5302,5734,])
array_2 = np.array([0.006,0.007,0.008,0.009,0.01,0.015,0.012,0.013,0.015,0.017,0.018,0.024,0.03,0.041,0.056,0.041,0.119,0.508,2.578,6.064,7.117,9.221,11.625,12.662,13.177,13.351,13.051,13.778,12.224,14.493,20.058,25.938,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Miles"
array_2_name = "Solar power generated in Spain"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Popularity of the first name Miles
- Line chart for only Solar power generated in Spain
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Marvelous Miles: Merit of Moniker Meets Solar Sirens in Spain
Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!
Correlation ID: 3870 · Black Variable ID: 2627 · Red Variable ID: 23996