Report an error
Solar power generated in Spain correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'how to go to space' | r=0.98 | 18yrs | No |
Google searches for 'i have a headache' | r=0.97 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Miles | r=0.97 | 32yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Levi | r=0.96 | 32yrs | No |
Butter consumption | r=0.96 | 32yrs | No |
Number of firearms manufactured in the US | r=0.95 | 32yrs | Yes! |
The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.91 | 32yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Lumberton, North Carolina | r=0.82 | 18yrs | Yes! |
Solar power generated in Spain also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)