about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,868 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Annual US household spending on shoes and the second variable is Season wins for the Minnesota Vikings.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

The correlation is due to the fact that as household spending on shoes goes up, so does the height of the average person. This then leads to the Vikings having a "taller" advantage over their opponents, helping them secure more wins in the season. They're really "stepping up" their game, thanks to all the fancy footwear purchased across the country! Remember, when it comes to the Vikings, it's all about that sole power. Keep on lacing up those victories!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Sure! Here's an image generation prompt for DALL·E-3 in the specified style: "Generate an image that resembles a scene from a Disney movie. The scene depicts a graph with the x-axis representing the years and the y-axis showing the annual US household spending on shoes. The line of the graph rises sharply, signifying the skyrocketing spending. In the background, imagine a football field with the Minnesota Vikings scoring multiple victories, surrounded by enthusiastic fans in high spirits. The players of the team exude confidence, seemingly powered by the energy of the shoes bought by the enthusiastic fans. Keep the visual depiction simple and do not include any words or speech bubbles." The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Annual US household spending on shoes and Season wins for the Minnesota Vikings. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image Sci-fi fantacy Parallax art Psychedelic An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Annual US household spending on shoes and Season wins for the Minnesota Vikings, in the following situation: As US household spending on shoes skyrocketed, the Vikings started winning because they were finally "soul"-ed out! The players must have felt more "heel"-thy and "toe"-tally unstoppable with all the support from the ground up! It's all about "laces" and grace on the field!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Imagine a graph with the x-axis depicting the years and the y-axis showing the annual US household spending on shoes. The line of the graph rises sharply, signifying the skyrocketing spending. In the background, picture a football field with the Minnesota Vikings scoring multiple victories, their players in high spirits and exuding confidence, as if powered by the energy of the shoes bought by the enthusiastic fans.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a graph with the x-axis depicting the years and the y-axis showing the annual US household spending on shoes. The line of the graph rises sharply, signifying the skyrocketing spending. In the background, picture a football field with the Minnesota Vikings scoring multiple victories, their players in high spirits and exuding confidence, as if powered by the energy of the shoes bought by the enthusiastic fans. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Sure! Here's an image generation prompt for DALL·E-3 in the specified style: "Generate an image that resembles a scene from a Disney movie. The scene depicts a graph with the x-axis representing the years and the y-axis showing the annual US household spending on shoes. The line of the graph rises sharply, signifying the skyrocketing spending. In the background, imagine a football field with the Minnesota Vikings scoring multiple victories, surrounded by enthusiastic fans in high spirits. The players of the team exude confidence, seemingly powered by the energy of the shoes bought by the enthusiastic fans. Keep the visual depiction simple and do not include any words or speech bubbles."

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Annual US household spending on shoes caused Season wins for the Minnesota Vikings to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Boots Loots and Football Suits: A Statistical Poem on Household Spending on Shoes and Minnesota Vikings' Victories

The Journal of Sports Economics and Consumer Behavior

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on shoes and Season wins for the Minnesota Vikings. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.5072046 and p < 0.05 for 2000 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Boots Loots and Football Suits: A Statistical Poem on Household Spending on Shoes and Minnesota Vikings' Victories"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we lace up our research boots to investigate the peculiar relationship between annual US household spending on shoes and the seasonal wins of the Minnesota Vikings. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com, we embark on a statistical journey that toes the line between serious inquiry and whimsical curiosity. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.5072046 and p < 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2022, prompting us to ponder whether there's more to the Vikings' victories than meets the eye. As we delve into these puzzling patterns, we uncover unexpected parallels and footnotes that may just leave you kicking yourself for not considering the impact of footwear fashion on the football field. So, buckle up and get ready to step into the fascinating world of statistical analysis and gridiron glory.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on shoes and Season wins for the Minnesota Vikings. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Boots Loots and Football Suits: A Statistical Poem on Household Spending on Shoes and Minnesota Vikings' Victories"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we lace up our research boots to investigate the peculiar relationship between annual US household spending on shoes and the seasonal wins of the Minnesota Vikings. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com, we embark on a statistical journey that toes the line between serious inquiry and whimsical curiosity. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.5072046 and p < 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2022, prompting us to ponder whether there's more to the Vikings' victories than meets the eye. As we delve into these puzzling patterns, we uncover unexpected parallels and footnotes that may just leave you kicking yourself for not considering the impact of footwear fashion on the football field. So, buckle up and get ready to step into the fascinating world of statistical analysis and gridiron glory.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Amidst the roar of the crowd, the clinking of cleats, and the swish of crisp dollar bills being exchanged for the latest and trendiest pairs of shoes, lies a peculiar and enigmatic connection that has long evaded the scrutiny of statistical inquiry. Nestled within the annals of American consumerism and the exhilarating triumphs and tribulations of professional football, a peculiar relationship has emerged – one that intertwines the seemingly disparate realms of household shoe expenditures and the exhilarating victories of the Minnesota Vikings on the gridiron.

It's a tale as old as time – or at least as old as the data we have available from the years 2000 to 2022. As we embark on this whimsical journey, reminiscent of a pun-laden scenic drive through the statistical countryside, we find ourselves donning our analytical helmets (or helmets of analysis, if you will) to explore the unexpected correlation between the moolah spent on footwear and the pigskin prowess of the Minnesota Vikings.

Like Cinderella's glass slipper, this correlation has remained elusive, often overshadowed by the glitz and glamor of more traditional sports metrics. However, our study aims to cast a spotlight on this curious Cinderella story – or would it be more fitting to say, Glass Cleat story – shedding light on the intriguing dance between consumer choice and NFL success.

Ah, but before we embark on this statistical escapade, it's only fair to ask the pertinent question: Are we barking up the right tree, or are we merely stumbling through the statistical forest in search of correlation, much like a lost sole (soul, for the pun enthusiasts) in a shoe store?

In this research paper, we delve into the intricacies of consumer behavior, the zeitgeist of footwear fashion, and the inexplicable sway these patterns may hold over the fates of one of the most beloved football teams in the NFL. So, buckle up – or should we say, lace up – as we wade through the numbers, lace together the strands of this enthralling narrative, and step into the surprisingly fascinating world of household spending on shoes and the gridiron shenanigans of the Minnesota Vikings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on shoes and Season wins for the Minnesota Vikings. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Boots Loots and Football Suits: A Statistical Poem on Household Spending on Shoes and Minnesota Vikings' Victories"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we lace up our research boots to investigate the peculiar relationship between annual US household spending on shoes and the seasonal wins of the Minnesota Vikings. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com, we embark on a statistical journey that toes the line between serious inquiry and whimsical curiosity. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.5072046 and p < 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2022, prompting us to ponder whether there's more to the Vikings' victories than meets the eye. As we delve into these puzzling patterns, we uncover unexpected parallels and footnotes that may just leave you kicking yourself for not considering the impact of footwear fashion on the football field. So, buckle up and get ready to step into the fascinating world of statistical analysis and gridiron glory.


-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Amidst the roar of the crowd, the clinking of cleats, and the swish of crisp dollar bills being exchanged for the latest and trendiest pairs of shoes, lies a peculiar and enigmatic connection that has long evaded the scrutiny of statistical inquiry. Nestled within the annals of American consumerism and the exhilarating triumphs and tribulations of professional football, a peculiar relationship has emerged – one that intertwines the seemingly disparate realms of household shoe expenditures and the exhilarating victories of the Minnesota Vikings on the gridiron.
It's a tale as old as time – or at least as old as the data we have available from the years 2000 to 2022. As we embark on this whimsical journey, reminiscent of a pun-laden scenic drive through the statistical countryside, we find ourselves donning our analytical helmets (or helmets of analysis, if you will) to explore the unexpected correlation between the moolah spent on footwear and the pigskin prowess of the Minnesota Vikings.
Like Cinderella's glass slipper, this correlation has remained elusive, often overshadowed by the glitz and glamor of more traditional sports metrics. However, our study aims to cast a spotlight on this curious Cinderella story – or would it be more fitting to say, Glass Cleat story – shedding light on the intriguing dance between consumer choice and NFL success.
Ah, but before we embark on this statistical escapade, it's only fair to ask the pertinent question: Are we barking up the right tree, or are we merely stumbling through the statistical forest in search of correlation, much like a lost sole (soul, for the pun enthusiasts) in a shoe store?
In this research paper, we delve into the intricacies of consumer behavior, the zeitgeist of footwear fashion, and the inexplicable sway these patterns may hold over the fates of one of the most beloved football teams in the NFL. So, buckle up – or should we say, lace up – as we wade through the numbers, lace together the strands of this enthralling narrative, and step into the surprisingly fascinating world of household spending on shoes and the gridiron shenanigans of the Minnesota Vikings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "The Sole Connection: A Statistical Inquiry into Household Expenditure on Footwear and Its Impact on Professional Sports," Smith et al. (2015) present an analysis of the relationship between consumer spending on shoes and the performance of sports teams. The authors propose that there may exist a previously unexplored link between the amount of cold, hard cash dropped on footwear and the hot, fiery wins of sports teams. However, they refrain from delving into specific teams or sports, leaving the tantalizing prospect of such a correlation hanging by a shoelace. It is our task to grab hold of that shoelace and pull with all our might.

In "Feetball: A Statistical Analysis of Shoe Spending and Sports Success," Doe et al. (2018) delve into the world of athletic achievements and consumer choices, seeking to uncover potential connections that lie beneath the surface. While their study focuses on a broader spectrum of sports, their findings prod the reader's imagination, igniting a spark of curiosity about the specific interplay between shoe spending and the prowess of specific teams in distinct sports. The Minnesota Vikings stand as the harbingers of a fascinating journey into this uncharted statistical terrain - a journey that we willingly embark upon with fervor and perhaps a touch of irrational exuberance.

Moreover, Jones' "Footloose and Football-Free: A Treatise on the Socioeconomic Impacts of Shoe Purchases" (2020) provides valuable insights into the cultural and economic ramifications of footwear acquisitions. While Jones does not explicitly explore the influence of shoe spending on sports victories, the socio-economic factors at play are undeniably intertwined with the broader context of consumer behavior. As we metaphorically tiptoe through the tulips of household expenditures and pigskin pursuits, it would be remiss not to acknowledge the potential implications of cultural and economic trends on the playing field.

Transitioning from the shores of non-fiction academia to the mystical, mystical lands of fiction and imagination, we find ourselves drawn to a peculiar array of literature that, while not directly related, seems to twinkle with a hint of relevance. "The Shoe Must Go On" by Jane Cobb suggests a whimsical tale of footwear whimsy and may just offer a metaphorical glimpse into the secret steps (pun intended) of sporting success.

On a more serious note, we cannot overlook the potential influence of board games on our quest for statistical enlightenment. "Monopoly: Shoe Edition" seems an amusing diversion, but its underlying principles of fiscal strategy may serve as a peculiar, yet relevant, parallel to the intricate dance of shoes and sports. As we roll the dice of correlation, who's to say that we won't stumble upon a winning avenue of inquiry within the whimsical world of board game statistics?

In conclusion, our foray into the literature has provided a blend of solemn theories, whimsical whispers, and unexpected inspirations, all pointing towards the fascinating interplay between household shoe expenditures and the seasonal conquests of the Minnesota Vikings. It is with a light heart and a firm resolve that we step forward into the fray of statistical analysis, prepared to juggle numbers, pirouette through data, and perhaps even stumble upon a golden nugget of truth amidst the shoe racks of statistical inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on shoes and Season wins for the Minnesota Vikings. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com . You used data from 2000 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Boots Loots and Football Suits: A Statistical Poem on Household Spending on Shoes and Minnesota Vikings' Victories"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we lace up our research boots to investigate the peculiar relationship between annual US household spending on shoes and the seasonal wins of the Minnesota Vikings. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com, we embark on a statistical journey that toes the line between serious inquiry and whimsical curiosity. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.5072046 and p < 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2022, prompting us to ponder whether there's more to the Vikings' victories than meets the eye. As we delve into these puzzling patterns, we uncover unexpected parallels and footnotes that may just leave you kicking yourself for not considering the impact of footwear fashion on the football field. So, buckle up and get ready to step into the fascinating world of statistical analysis and gridiron glory.


[[INTRODUCTION]]
Amidst the roar of the crowd, the clinking of cleats, and the swish of crisp dollar bills being exchanged for the latest and trendiest pairs of shoes, lies a peculiar and enigmatic connection that has long evaded the scrutiny of statistical inquiry. Nestled within the annals of American consumerism and the exhilarating triumphs and tribulations of professional football, a peculiar relationship has emerged – one that intertwines the seemingly disparate realms of household shoe expenditures and the exhilarating victories of the Minnesota Vikings on the gridiron.
It's a tale as old as time – or at least as old as the data we have available from the years 2000 to 2022. As we embark on this whimsical journey, reminiscent of a pun-laden scenic drive through the statistical countryside, we find ourselves donning our analytical helmets (or helmets of analysis, if you will) to explore the unexpected correlation between the moolah spent on footwear and the pigskin prowess of the Minnesota Vikings.
Like Cinderella's glass slipper, this correlation has remained elusive, often overshadowed by the glitz and glamor of more traditional sports metrics. However, our study aims to cast a spotlight on this curious Cinderella story – or would it be more fitting to say, Glass Cleat story – shedding light on the intriguing dance between consumer choice and NFL success.
Ah, but before we embark on this statistical escapade, it's only fair to ask the pertinent question: Are we barking up the right tree, or are we merely stumbling through the statistical forest in search of correlation, much like a lost sole (soul, for the pun enthusiasts) in a shoe store?
In this research paper, we delve into the intricacies of consumer behavior, the zeitgeist of footwear fashion, and the inexplicable sway these patterns may hold over the fates of one of the most beloved football teams in the NFL. So, buckle up – or should we say, lace up – as we wade through the numbers, lace together the strands of this enthralling narrative, and step into the surprisingly fascinating world of household spending on shoes and the gridiron shenanigans of the Minnesota Vikings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the perplexing correlation between annual US household spending on shoes and the seasonal wins of the Minnesota Vikings, we employed a methodological approach that was equal parts scientific rigor and whimsical wonder. Our data sources primarily comprised the Bureau of Labor Statistics for household spending on shoes and Pro-Football-Reference.com for the Minnesota Vikings' seasonal wins, with the years 2000 to 2022 serving as the canvas for our statistical masterpiece.

Firstly, we meticulously combed through the treasure trove of information provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, extracting data on annual household expenditures specifically related to footwear, ensuring we didn't step on any toes in the process. This pivot to examining shoe-related spending not only allowed us to delve into the footloose and fancy-free world of consumer behavior but also laced our study with a dash of sartorial flair.

Simultaneously, our research team embarked on a digital pilgrimage through the gridiron archives of Pro-Football-Reference.com, scouring the annals of American football history for the seasonal victories of the Minnesota Vikings. We left no cleat unturned in our pursuit of statistical enlightenment, extracting hard-hitting data on wins, losses, and the occasional tie, ensuring that no statistical touchdown went uncelebrated.

After the painstaking collection of data, we engaged in a calculated dance of statistical analysis, akin to a carefully choreographed ballet of numbers and coefficients. Our primary statistical tool was the Pearson correlation coefficient, which allowed us to quantitatively assess the relationship between household spending on shoes and the Minnesota Vikings' seasonal wins. The notion of this correlation being entirely coincidental was put to the test, and we were determined to uncover whether there was more to this peculiar pas de deux than meets the eye.

Armed with our trusty statistical instruments, we performed rigorous analyses and computations, employing robust statistical software to ensure the reliability and validity of our findings. Our analysis took into account the potential influence of confounding variables, such as changes in consumer preferences over time and the ebb and flow of the Vikings' roster dynamics.

To ensure the integrity of our study, we diligently cross-referenced our findings with existing literature on consumer behavior, athletic performance, and the curious interplay between seemingly unrelated spheres of human activity. This multifaceted approach allowed us to contextualize our findings within the broader tapestry of academic inquiry and infuse our study with a touch of scholarly sophistication, much like a well-crafted pair of Oxford shoes adorning the shelves of a high-end department store.

Overall, our methodology combined the precision of statistical analysis with the adventurous spirit of exploratory inquiry, creating a robust framework for unraveling the enigmatic connection between household shoe expenditures and the gridiron glories of the Minnesota Vikings. Stay tuned as we unravel the results in the subsequent sections, where we delve into the surprising implications of our findings and the tantalizing questions they pose for the realms of consumer studies and athletic performance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on shoes and Season wins for the Minnesota Vikings. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com .

For the time period 2000 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.5072046, r-squared of 0.2572565, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Boots Loots and Football Suits: A Statistical Poem on Household Spending on Shoes and Minnesota Vikings' Victories"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we lace up our research boots to investigate the peculiar relationship between annual US household spending on shoes and the seasonal wins of the Minnesota Vikings. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com, we embark on a statistical journey that toes the line between serious inquiry and whimsical curiosity. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.5072046 and p < 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2022, prompting us to ponder whether there's more to the Vikings' victories than meets the eye. As we delve into these puzzling patterns, we uncover unexpected parallels and footnotes that may just leave you kicking yourself for not considering the impact of footwear fashion on the football field. So, buckle up and get ready to step into the fascinating world of statistical analysis and gridiron glory.


-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Amidst the roar of the crowd, the clinking of cleats, and the swish of crisp dollar bills being exchanged for the latest and trendiest pairs of shoes, lies a peculiar and enigmatic connection that has long evaded the scrutiny of statistical inquiry. Nestled within the annals of American consumerism and the exhilarating triumphs and tribulations of professional football, a peculiar relationship has emerged – one that intertwines the seemingly disparate realms of household shoe expenditures and the exhilarating victories of the Minnesota Vikings on the gridiron.
It's a tale as old as time – or at least as old as the data we have available from the years 2000 to 2022. As we embark on this whimsical journey, reminiscent of a pun-laden scenic drive through the statistical countryside, we find ourselves donning our analytical helmets (or helmets of analysis, if you will) to explore the unexpected correlation between the moolah spent on footwear and the pigskin prowess of the Minnesota Vikings.
Like Cinderella's glass slipper, this correlation has remained elusive, often overshadowed by the glitz and glamor of more traditional sports metrics. However, our study aims to cast a spotlight on this curious Cinderella story – or would it be more fitting to say, Glass Cleat story – shedding light on the intriguing dance between consumer choice and NFL success.
Ah, but before we embark on this statistical escapade, it's only fair to ask the pertinent question: Are we barking up the right tree, or are we merely stumbling through the statistical forest in search of correlation, much like a lost sole (soul, for the pun enthusiasts) in a shoe store?
In this research paper, we delve into the intricacies of consumer behavior, the zeitgeist of footwear fashion, and the inexplicable sway these patterns may hold over the fates of one of the most beloved football teams in the NFL. So, buckle up – or should we say, lace up – as we wade through the numbers, lace together the strands of this enthralling narrative, and step into the surprisingly fascinating world of household spending on shoes and the gridiron shenanigans of the Minnesota Vikings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of our data revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.5072046 and an r-squared value of 0.2572565 for the relationship between annual US household spending on shoes and the season wins for the Minnesota Vikings. And yes, you read that right - there is indeed a statistically significant correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, with a p-value of less than 0.05. It seems that when it comes to the Vikings' victories, the shoe truly fits!

Fig. 1 illustrates this striking relationship, with the scatterplot showing a clear positive trend between the two variables. It's as if each extra dollar spent on shoes has been stepping up the Vikings' game, one fashionable foot at a time.

But let's not jump to conclusions just yet! While the correlation is undoubtedly intriguing, we mustn't lose sight of the fact that correlation does not imply causation. We can't simply assert that purchasing a killer pair of kicks will guarantee a winning season for the Vikings, although that would certainly make for an interesting endorsement deal!

Nonetheless, this finding opens the door to a myriad of questions and speculations. Are the players secretly relying on lucky sneakers to secure their victories? Do the roar of the crowd and the clatter of spikes on the field echo the pulsating rhythm of consumer spending trends? And most importantly, should we start including stylish heels and snazzy sneakers in the playbook for guaranteed touchdown success?

The results of this study not only unveil a surprising statistical relationship but also invite us to ponder the intricate dance between commerce and competition, as if the world of football and the world of fashion have found an unexpected common ground. There's more to these numbers than meets the eye, and we're just getting started unraveling this whimsical statistical enigma.

So, while we may not have the definitive answer just yet, we can certainly take a moment to appreciate the lighthearted, quirky side of statistical analysis. After all, who knew that charting the path of pigskin victories and footwear expenses would lead us down such a delightful rabbit hole of statistical curiosity?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on shoes and Season wins for the Minnesota Vikings. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Boots Loots and Football Suits: A Statistical Poem on Household Spending on Shoes and Minnesota Vikings' Victories"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we lace up our research boots to investigate the peculiar relationship between annual US household spending on shoes and the seasonal wins of the Minnesota Vikings. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com, we embark on a statistical journey that toes the line between serious inquiry and whimsical curiosity. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.5072046 and p < 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2022, prompting us to ponder whether there's more to the Vikings' victories than meets the eye. As we delve into these puzzling patterns, we uncover unexpected parallels and footnotes that may just leave you kicking yourself for not considering the impact of footwear fashion on the football field. So, buckle up and get ready to step into the fascinating world of statistical analysis and gridiron glory.


[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Sole Connection: A Statistical Inquiry into Household Expenditure on Footwear and Its Impact on Professional Sports," Smith et al. (2015) present an analysis of the relationship between consumer spending on shoes and the performance of sports teams. The authors propose that there may exist a previously unexplored link between the amount of cold, hard cash dropped on footwear and the hot, fiery wins of sports teams. However, they refrain from delving into specific teams or sports, leaving the tantalizing prospect of such a correlation hanging by a shoelace. It is our task to grab hold of that shoelace and pull with all our might.
In "Feetball: A Statistical Analysis of Shoe Spending and Sports Success," Doe et al. (2018) delve into the world of athletic achievements and consumer choices, seeking to uncover potential connections that lie beneath the surface. While their study focuses on a broader spectrum of sports, their findings prod the reader's imagination, igniting a spark of curiosity about the specific interplay between shoe spending and the prowess of specific teams in distinct sports. The Minnesota Vikings stand as the harbingers of a fascinating journey into this uncharted statistical terrain - a journey that we willingly embark upon with fervor and perhaps a touch of irrational exuberance.
Moreover, Jones' "Footloose and Football-Free: A Treatise on the Socioeconomic Impacts of Shoe Purchases" (2020) provides valuable insights into the cultural and economic ramifications of footwear acquisitions. While Jones does not explicitly explore the influence of shoe spending on sports victories, the socio-economic factors at play are undeniably intertwined with the broader context of consumer behavior. As we metaphorically tiptoe through the tulips of household expenditures and pigskin pursuits, it would be remiss not to acknowledge the potential implications of cultural and economic trends on the playing field.
Transitioning from the shores of non-fiction academia to the mystical, mystical lands of fiction and imagination, we find ourselves drawn to a peculiar array of literature that, while not directly related, seems to twinkle with a hint of relevance. "The Shoe Must Go On" by Jane Cobb suggests a whimsical tale of footwear whimsy and may just offer a metaphorical glimpse into the secret steps (pun intended) of sporting success.
On a more serious note, we cannot overlook the potential influence of board games on our quest for statistical enlightenment. "Monopoly: Shoe Edition" seems an amusing diversion, but its underlying principles of fiscal strategy may serve as a peculiar, yet relevant, parallel to the intricate dance of shoes and sports. As we roll the dice of correlation, who's to say that we won't stumble upon a winning avenue of inquiry within the whimsical world of board game statistics?
In conclusion, our foray into the literature has provided a blend of solemn theories, whimsical whispers, and unexpected inspirations, all pointing towards the fascinating interplay between household shoe expenditures and the seasonal conquests of the Minnesota Vikings. It is with a light heart and a firm resolve that we step forward into the fray of statistical analysis, prepared to juggle numbers, pirouette through data, and perhaps even stumble upon a golden nugget of truth amidst the shoe racks of statistical inquiry.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of our data revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.5072046 and an r-squared value of 0.2572565 for the relationship between annual US household spending on shoes and the season wins for the Minnesota Vikings. And yes, you read that right - there is indeed a statistically significant correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, with a p-value of less than 0.05. It seems that when it comes to the Vikings' victories, the shoe truly fits!
Fig. 1 illustrates this striking relationship, with the scatterplot showing a clear positive trend between the two variables. It's as if each extra dollar spent on shoes has been stepping up the Vikings' game, one fashionable foot at a time.
But let's not jump to conclusions just yet! While the correlation is undoubtedly intriguing, we mustn't lose sight of the fact that correlation does not imply causation. We can't simply assert that purchasing a killer pair of kicks will guarantee a winning season for the Vikings, although that would certainly make for an interesting endorsement deal!
Nonetheless, this finding opens the door to a myriad of questions and speculations. Are the players secretly relying on lucky sneakers to secure their victories? Do the roar of the crowd and the clatter of spikes on the field echo the pulsating rhythm of consumer spending trends? And most importantly, should we start including stylish heels and snazzy sneakers in the playbook for guaranteed touchdown success?
The results of this study not only unveil a surprising statistical relationship but also invite us to ponder the intricate dance between commerce and competition, as if the world of football and the world of fashion have found an unexpected common ground. There's more to these numbers than meets the eye, and we're just getting started unraveling this whimsical statistical enigma.
So, while we may not have the definitive answer just yet, we can certainly take a moment to appreciate the lighthearted, quirky side of statistical analysis. After all, who knew that charting the path of pigskin victories and footwear expenses would lead us down such a delightful rabbit hole of statistical curiosity?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

In this scholarly escapade, we whisk our readers away into the whimsical, yet surprisingly substantial, world of statistical inquiry. As we steer our metaphorical ship of data through the choppy seas of consumer behavior and gridiron glory, we find ourselves confronted with a confounding conundrum: the mirthful correlation between annual US household spending on shoes and the seasonal wins of the Minnesota Vikings.

Our findings, boasting a correlation coefficient of 0.5072046 and a gift-wrapped p-value of less than 0.05, not only reinforce the mischievous musings of previous scholars but also unveil a potential for peculiar prosperity in the land of lace-ups and touchdowns. Smith et al. gazed into the crystal ball of consumer spending, Doe et al. took a sweeping glance across the fields of athletic prowess, and Jones served as our guide through the economic maelstrom – all of which laid the groundwork for our glittering revelation. We're not just talking toe-tapping theories here; we're waltzing into interconnectivity that would make the most whimsical board game statistics blush.

Our results, with the subtlety of a linebacker crashing through the defensive line, revealed a striking positive trend between the two variables. It's almost as if each additional dollar spent on shoes heralded another victorious hurrah for the ferocious Vikings. But before we start crafting catchy slogans for footwear-fueled championships, caution calls us to a moment of grim-faced reflection. Correlation, my dear readers, is not causation, and we cannot simply don purple jerseys and high heels in the name of statistical significance. That being said, the mere existence of this correlation opens a treasure trove of inquiries, drawing us into a double-dealing dance of fashion and football that we never knew existed.

So as we wind down this waltz of statistical delight, let's not forget the rich tapestry of eccentric academia that brought us to this splendid point. The whispered whimsy of Jane Cobb's "The Shoe Must Go On," the cheeky charm of board game economics, and the echoing brilliance of Jones's socio-economic treatise – all paved the way for our revelatory rendezvous with the unexpected. Truly, as we pore over numbers and diagrams, we find ourselves on the outskirts of a fantastical land where shoe expenditure and sports glory intertwine like the most delightful of synergistic sonnets.

In closing, while our boots might be caked with the remnants of statistical exploration, our hearts are brimming with the jubilant knowledge that the world of academic inquiry never fails to surprise us. For who could have predicted that the stomp of a fashionable heel and the thud of a pigskin could be linked in such an unexpected allegro? Let's raise a toast to the twisty, turny path of statistical inquiry – where consumer trends and championship dreams whirl like a dervish of delightful data.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on shoes and Season wins for the Minnesota Vikings. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Boots Loots and Football Suits: A Statistical Poem on Household Spending on Shoes and Minnesota Vikings' Victories"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we lace up our research boots to investigate the peculiar relationship between annual US household spending on shoes and the seasonal wins of the Minnesota Vikings. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com, we embark on a statistical journey that toes the line between serious inquiry and whimsical curiosity. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.5072046 and p < 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2022, prompting us to ponder whether there's more to the Vikings' victories than meets the eye. As we delve into these puzzling patterns, we uncover unexpected parallels and footnotes that may just leave you kicking yourself for not considering the impact of footwear fashion on the football field. So, buckle up and get ready to step into the fascinating world of statistical analysis and gridiron glory.


[[INTRDUCTION]]
Amidst the roar of the crowd, the clinking of cleats, and the swish of crisp dollar bills being exchanged for the latest and trendiest pairs of shoes, lies a peculiar and enigmatic connection that has long evaded the scrutiny of statistical inquiry. Nestled within the annals of American consumerism and the exhilarating triumphs and tribulations of professional football, a peculiar relationship has emerged – one that intertwines the seemingly disparate realms of household shoe expenditures and the exhilarating victories of the Minnesota Vikings on the gridiron.
It's a tale as old as time – or at least as old as the data we have available from the years 2000 to 2022. As we embark on this whimsical journey, reminiscent of a pun-laden scenic drive through the statistical countryside, we find ourselves donning our analytical helmets (or helmets of analysis, if you will) to explore the unexpected correlation between the moolah spent on footwear and the pigskin prowess of the Minnesota Vikings.
Like Cinderella's glass slipper, this correlation has remained elusive, often overshadowed by the glitz and glamor of more traditional sports metrics. However, our study aims to cast a spotlight on this curious Cinderella story – or would it be more fitting to say, Glass Cleat story – shedding light on the intriguing dance between consumer choice and NFL success.
Ah, but before we embark on this statistical escapade, it's only fair to ask the pertinent question: Are we barking up the right tree, or are we merely stumbling through the statistical forest in search of correlation, much like a lost sole (soul, for the pun enthusiasts) in a shoe store?
In this research paper, we delve into the intricacies of consumer behavior, the zeitgeist of footwear fashion, and the inexplicable sway these patterns may hold over the fates of one of the most beloved football teams in the NFL. So, buckle up – or should we say, lace up – as we wade through the numbers, lace together the strands of this enthralling narrative, and step into the surprisingly fascinating world of household spending on shoes and the gridiron shenanigans of the Minnesota Vikings.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of our data revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.5072046 and an r-squared value of 0.2572565 for the relationship between annual US household spending on shoes and the season wins for the Minnesota Vikings. And yes, you read that right - there is indeed a statistically significant correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, with a p-value of less than 0.05. It seems that when it comes to the Vikings' victories, the shoe truly fits!
Fig. 1 illustrates this striking relationship, with the scatterplot showing a clear positive trend between the two variables. It's as if each extra dollar spent on shoes has been stepping up the Vikings' game, one fashionable foot at a time.
But let's not jump to conclusions just yet! While the correlation is undoubtedly intriguing, we mustn't lose sight of the fact that correlation does not imply causation. We can't simply assert that purchasing a killer pair of kicks will guarantee a winning season for the Vikings, although that would certainly make for an interesting endorsement deal!
Nonetheless, this finding opens the door to a myriad of questions and speculations. Are the players secretly relying on lucky sneakers to secure their victories? Do the roar of the crowd and the clatter of spikes on the field echo the pulsating rhythm of consumer spending trends? And most importantly, should we start including stylish heels and snazzy sneakers in the playbook for guaranteed touchdown success?
The results of this study not only unveil a surprising statistical relationship but also invite us to ponder the intricate dance between commerce and competition, as if the world of football and the world of fashion have found an unexpected common ground. There's more to these numbers than meets the eye, and we're just getting started unraveling this whimsical statistical enigma.
So, while we may not have the definitive answer just yet, we can certainly take a moment to appreciate the lighthearted, quirky side of statistical analysis. After all, who knew that charting the path of pigskin victories and footwear expenses would lead us down such a delightful rabbit hole of statistical curiosity?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has shone a spotlight on the quirky correlation between household spending on shoes and the success of the Minnesota Vikings, proving that sometimes the shoe really does fit! The statistical coefficient of 0.5072046 has left us scratching our heads in wonder, pondering if perhaps the players have been secretly swapping out their cleats for some snazzy stilettos on game day. While our findings may seem off-kilter, the numbers don't lie—unless, of course, they're slipping on a pair of Chucks.

As we bid adieu to this peculiar correlation, we must emphasize that our results prompt further questions. Are touchdowns fueled by well-heeled fans, or do the uniforms conceal a sneakerhead surprise? The gridiron may just be a catwalk in disguise! And imagine the game-changing potential of a coordinated footwear line for the Vikings – cleats with a kick!

Alas, despite the lure of dive into this whimsical wonderland of statistics and sports, we must assert with unwavering confidence that no further research is needed in this area. Our findings dance the line between the plausible and the downright absurd, and it's time to put this Cinderella story to bed. In the world of academia, some correlations are best left to the imagination.

So let us tip our hats – or kick up our heels – to the mirthful mysteries of statistical analysis, for the road less traveled sometimes leads to the most delightful discoveries. And remember, when it comes to the Minnesota Vikings and household shoe spending, the correlation may be charming, but the causation is still waltzing its way through statistical Cinderella stories.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Boots Loots and Football Suits: A Statistical Poem on Household Spending on Shoes and Minnesota Vikings' Victories. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sports Economics and Consumer Behavior


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Boots Loots and Football Suits: A Statistical Poem on Household Spending on Shoes and Minnesota Vikings' Victories. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Eccentric Economists' Emporium


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Boots Loots and Football Suits: A Statistical Poem on Household Spending on Shoes and Minnesota Vikings' Victories with an abstract of In this study, we lace up our research boots to investigate the peculiar relationship between annual US household spending on shoes and the seasonal wins of the Minnesota Vikings. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com, we embark on a statistical journey that toes the line between serious inquiry and whimsical curiosity. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.5072046 and p < 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2022, prompting us to ponder whether there's more to the Vikings' victories than meets the eye. As we delve into these puzzling patterns, we uncover unexpected parallels and footnotes that may just leave you kicking yourself for not considering the impact of footwear fashion on the football field. So, buckle up and get ready to step into the fascinating world of statistical analysis and gridiron glory.

ChatGPT:

annual US household spending, shoes, Minnesota Vikings, victories, correlation coefficient, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Pro-Football-Reference.com, statistical analysis, football suits, household spending, football victories, footwear fashion, statistical journey, whimsical curiosity

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Annual US household spending on shoes
Detailed data title: Average annual household spend on shoes
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
See what else correlates with Annual US household spending on shoes

Season wins for the Minnesota Vikings
Detailed data title: Number of season wins by the Minnesota Vikings
Source: Pro-Football-Reference.com
See what else correlates with Season wins for the Minnesota Vikings

Correlation r = 0.5072046 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.2572565 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 25.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Season wins for the Minnesota Vikings) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Annual US household spending on shoes) over the 23 years from 2000 through 2022.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.014. 0.0135007571041066460000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.51 in 1.4% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 74 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.12, 0.76 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Annual US household spending on shoes (Household spend)343302313294329320304327314323303321347307367354388379392419314336399
Season wins for the Minnesota Vikings (Vikings wins)1156989681012631057118138107813




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([343,302,313,294,329,320,304,327,314,323,303,321,347,307,367,354,388,379,392,419,314,336,399,])
array_2 = np.array([11,5,6,9,8,9,6,8,10,12,6,3,10,5,7,11,8,13,8,10,7,8,13,])
array_1_name = "Annual US household spending on shoes"
array_2_name = "Season wins for the Minnesota Vikings"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 3868 · Black Variable ID: 19924 · Red Variable ID: 19667
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0