Report an error
Annual US household spending on shoes correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Democratic Senators in California | r=0.95 | 7yrs | No |
The number of bartenders in Florida | r=0.9 | 20yrs | No |
The number of bartenders in District of Columbia | r=0.87 | 20yrs | No |
Restaurant spending in Utah | r=0.84 | 21yrs | No |
Total NBA League Revenue | r=0.75 | 21yrs | No |
Season wins for the Minnesota Vikings | r=0.51 | 23yrs | Yes! |
Annual US household spending on shoes also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)