AI explanation
As air pollution levels rose in Seneca, South Carolina, so did the ticket sales for the top movie of the year. It turns out, the smoggy air created the perfect conditions for a unique form of outdoor 3D projection, enhancing the overall cinematic experience. As the pollution particles mingled with the evening mist, they unintentionally formed a giant, high-definition screen in the sky, captivating the residents and drawing them to open-air theaters like never before. Who knew that Seneca's pollution was the unexpected, silver lining for the local entertainment industry!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of the streets of Seneca, South Carolina featuring a low poly art style. The scene should show a bustling movie theater, with a long line of people eagerly purchasing tickets for the top movie of the year. The air is notably clear, with less smog, and people are seen enjoying the fresh air as they make their way to the theater. The low poly style should emphasize the geometric shapes of the buildings, people, and trees, adding a unique visual appeal to the lively atmosphere of the scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Tickets Sold for the Top Movie of the Year. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Low poly Magic realism Cutsy art illustration Oragami Low poly
ChatGPT: Low poly
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Tickets Sold for the Top Movie of the Year, in the following situation: Because as air pollution decreases, people in Seneca, SC are less likely to stay indoors to avoid smog and are more likely to go out to watch the top movie of the year, driving up ticket sales.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: The streets of Seneca, South Carolina are filled with people lined up outside the movie theater, eagerly purchasing tickets to see the top movie of the year. The air is noticeably clearer, with fewer smog clouds hanging over the city. People are enjoying the fresh air as they make their way to the theater, looking forward to an exciting evening out.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Low poly ] and depicting this scene: The streets of Seneca, South Carolina are filled with people lined up outside the movie theater, eagerly purchasing tickets to see the top movie of the year. The air is noticeably clearer, with fewer smog clouds hanging over the city. People are enjoying the fresh air as they make their way to the theater, looking forward to an exciting evening out. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of the streets of Seneca, South Carolina featuring a low poly art style. The scene should show a bustling movie theater, with a long line of people eagerly purchasing tickets for the top movie of the year. The air is notably clear, with less smog, and people are seen enjoying the fresh air as they make their way to the theater. The low poly style should emphasize the geometric shapes of the buildings, people, and trees, adding a unique visual appeal to the lively atmosphere of the scene.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina positively influenced Tickets Sold for the Top Movie of the Year. Make it feel plausible.
AI academic paper
Smog and the Silver Screen: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Box Office Performance of the Top Movie of the Year The Journal of Environmental Entertainment Research Jan 2024 |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Tickets Sold for the Top Movie of the Year. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and The Numbers to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7132233 and p < 0.01 for 1995 to 2007.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Smog and the Silver Screen: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Box Office Performance of the Top Movie of the Year"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper employs sophisticated statistical methods to analyze the potential relationship between air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the number of tickets sold for the year's top movie. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and The Numbers, our research team explores the correlation between atmospheric pollutants and cinematic success. Despite the seriousness of our endeavor, we cannot help but marvel at the unexpected entwining of environmental factors and Hollywood flair. Our findings reveal a notably robust correlation coefficient of 0.7132233 with a significance level of p < 0.01 during the period spanning from 1995 to 2007. We delve into the implications of our results, shedding light on the elusive interplay between air quality and the allure of the silver screen. While our study is grounded in rigorous statistical analysis, we cannot resist the temptation to marvel at the quirky, captivating intersection of environmental data and box office magic.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Tickets Sold for the Top Movie of the Year. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Smog and the Silver Screen: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Box Office Performance of the Top Movie of the Year"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper employs sophisticated statistical methods to analyze the potential relationship between air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the number of tickets sold for the year's top movie. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and The Numbers, our research team explores the correlation between atmospheric pollutants and cinematic success. Despite the seriousness of our endeavor, we cannot help but marvel at the unexpected entwining of environmental factors and Hollywood flair. Our findings reveal a notably robust correlation coefficient of 0.7132233 with a significance level of p < 0.01 during the period spanning from 1995 to 2007. We delve into the implications of our results, shedding light on the elusive interplay between air quality and the allure of the silver screen. While our study is grounded in rigorous statistical analysis, we cannot resist the temptation to marvel at the quirky, captivating intersection of environmental data and box office magic.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enchanting world of cinema has long captivated audiences with its mesmerizing tales of heroism, romance, and space odysseys, but could there be a hidden player in this grand production? As we embark on our journey into the unknown, we find ourselves drawn to the unassuming town of Seneca, South Carolina. Nestled amidst the rolling hills and verdant landscapes, Seneca may not be the first place that comes to mind when one thinks of blockbuster movies or atmospheric pollutants. However, our quest for knowledge knows no bounds, and we are compelled to unravel the cosmic tapestry that weaves together air pollution and the silver screen.
Our pursuit begins with the ever-elusive phenomenon of air pollution, a subject that often conjures images of faceless industrial complexes and bustling urban centers. However, within the tranquil confines of Seneca, a subtle dance of atmospheric chemistry unfolds, offering an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. The marriage of environmental data and box office triumphs may seem an improbable match, akin to blending oil and water, but as the adage goes, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.
As intrepid researchers, we find ourselves grappling with the enigmatic nature of film success, seeking to untangle the web of variables that shape the fates of cinematic endeavors. With a twinkle of statistical wizardry and a dash of empirical inquiry, we set forth to examine the correlation between air quality and the dazzling allure of the silver screen. While our endeavor is rooted in the steadfast principles of scientific inquiry, we cannot help but revel in the paradoxical union of environmental quality and Hollywood magnificence.
Our endeavor beckons us to explore the interplay between Seneca's atmospheric milieu and the blockbuster phenomenon, teasing out the subtle nuances that influence the trajectory of box office triumphs. In doing so, we are reminded of the poetic dance of science and storytelling, where the dance floor is adorned with scatter plots and regression models instead of gossamer gowns and polished shoes.
Join us as we venture into this uncharted territory, where the realms of air pollution and cinematic grandeur converge in a dazzling display of statistical prowess and unbridled curiosity. In the words of the immortal bard, "All the world's a stage," and indeed, our stage is set with data points and celluloid dreams, beckoning us to unravel the secrets of Seneca's smog and the silver screen.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Tickets Sold for the Top Movie of the Year. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Smog and the Silver Screen: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Box Office Performance of the Top Movie of the Year"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper employs sophisticated statistical methods to analyze the potential relationship between air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the number of tickets sold for the year's top movie. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and The Numbers, our research team explores the correlation between atmospheric pollutants and cinematic success. Despite the seriousness of our endeavor, we cannot help but marvel at the unexpected entwining of environmental factors and Hollywood flair. Our findings reveal a notably robust correlation coefficient of 0.7132233 with a significance level of p < 0.01 during the period spanning from 1995 to 2007. We delve into the implications of our results, shedding light on the elusive interplay between air quality and the allure of the silver screen. While our study is grounded in rigorous statistical analysis, we cannot resist the temptation to marvel at the quirky, captivating intersection of environmental data and box office magic.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enchanting world of cinema has long captivated audiences with its mesmerizing tales of heroism, romance, and space odysseys, but could there be a hidden player in this grand production? As we embark on our journey into the unknown, we find ourselves drawn to the unassuming town of Seneca, South Carolina. Nestled amidst the rolling hills and verdant landscapes, Seneca may not be the first place that comes to mind when one thinks of blockbuster movies or atmospheric pollutants. However, our quest for knowledge knows no bounds, and we are compelled to unravel the cosmic tapestry that weaves together air pollution and the silver screen.
Our pursuit begins with the ever-elusive phenomenon of air pollution, a subject that often conjures images of faceless industrial complexes and bustling urban centers. However, within the tranquil confines of Seneca, a subtle dance of atmospheric chemistry unfolds, offering an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. The marriage of environmental data and box office triumphs may seem an improbable match, akin to blending oil and water, but as the adage goes, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.
As intrepid researchers, we find ourselves grappling with the enigmatic nature of film success, seeking to untangle the web of variables that shape the fates of cinematic endeavors. With a twinkle of statistical wizardry and a dash of empirical inquiry, we set forth to examine the correlation between air quality and the dazzling allure of the silver screen. While our endeavor is rooted in the steadfast principles of scientific inquiry, we cannot help but revel in the paradoxical union of environmental quality and Hollywood magnificence.
Our endeavor beckons us to explore the interplay between Seneca's atmospheric milieu and the blockbuster phenomenon, teasing out the subtle nuances that influence the trajectory of box office triumphs. In doing so, we are reminded of the poetic dance of science and storytelling, where the dance floor is adorned with scatter plots and regression models instead of gossamer gowns and polished shoes.
Join us as we venture into this uncharted territory, where the realms of air pollution and cinematic grandeur converge in a dazzling display of statistical prowess and unbridled curiosity. In the words of the immortal bard, "All the world's a stage," and indeed, our stage is set with data points and celluloid dreams, beckoning us to unravel the secrets of Seneca's smog and the silver screen.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith (2010) conducted a comprehensive study on air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina, examining various atmospheric pollutants and their impact on the local environment. The authors found a significant increase in particulate matter during peak traffic hours, shedding light on the intersection of vehicular emissions and air quality. Moreover, Doe (2013) delved into the enchanting world of cinematic phenomena, exploring the intricacies of box office success and audience reception. Their research illuminated the multifaceted factors that contribute to a movie's commercial triumph, ranging from marketing strategies to audience demographics.
Turning to non-fiction references, the work of Jones (2015) provided valuable insights into the economic implications of environmental regulations in small towns, offering a nuanced perspective on the delicate balance between industry and ecological sustainability. Furthermore, "The Economics of Clean Air" by Lester (2017) presented a compelling discourse on the societal costs of air pollution, delving into the far-reaching consequences of environmental degradation.
In the realm of fiction, "Smoke and Mirrors" by Thompson (2012) captivated readers with its compelling narrative set amidst a backdrop of industrial intrigue and atmospheric unrest. Similarly, "The Smog Siren" by Patel (2016) wove a tale of environmental activism and cinematic splendor, blurring the boundaries between reality and imagination.
Beyond the traditional academic sources, our literature review encompassed an unconventional exploration, delving into the whispering aisles of the local library and the hallowed digital archives of internet forums. In a serendipitous turn of events, our research team stumbled upon the profound wisdom encapsulated within the cryptic tapestry of CVS receipts, each offering a glimpse into the whimsical interplay of consumer behavior and cinematic revelry. While perhaps a departure from scholarly convention, this eccentric foray yielded unexpected insights into the eclectic connections between air pollution and the allure of the silver screen.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Tickets Sold for the Top Movie of the Year. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and The Numbers . You used data from 1995 to 2007
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Smog and the Silver Screen: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Box Office Performance of the Top Movie of the Year"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper employs sophisticated statistical methods to analyze the potential relationship between air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the number of tickets sold for the year's top movie. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and The Numbers, our research team explores the correlation between atmospheric pollutants and cinematic success. Despite the seriousness of our endeavor, we cannot help but marvel at the unexpected entwining of environmental factors and Hollywood flair. Our findings reveal a notably robust correlation coefficient of 0.7132233 with a significance level of p < 0.01 during the period spanning from 1995 to 2007. We delve into the implications of our results, shedding light on the elusive interplay between air quality and the allure of the silver screen. While our study is grounded in rigorous statistical analysis, we cannot resist the temptation to marvel at the quirky, captivating intersection of environmental data and box office magic.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enchanting world of cinema has long captivated audiences with its mesmerizing tales of heroism, romance, and space odysseys, but could there be a hidden player in this grand production? As we embark on our journey into the unknown, we find ourselves drawn to the unassuming town of Seneca, South Carolina. Nestled amidst the rolling hills and verdant landscapes, Seneca may not be the first place that comes to mind when one thinks of blockbuster movies or atmospheric pollutants. However, our quest for knowledge knows no bounds, and we are compelled to unravel the cosmic tapestry that weaves together air pollution and the silver screen.
Our pursuit begins with the ever-elusive phenomenon of air pollution, a subject that often conjures images of faceless industrial complexes and bustling urban centers. However, within the tranquil confines of Seneca, a subtle dance of atmospheric chemistry unfolds, offering an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. The marriage of environmental data and box office triumphs may seem an improbable match, akin to blending oil and water, but as the adage goes, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.
As intrepid researchers, we find ourselves grappling with the enigmatic nature of film success, seeking to untangle the web of variables that shape the fates of cinematic endeavors. With a twinkle of statistical wizardry and a dash of empirical inquiry, we set forth to examine the correlation between air quality and the dazzling allure of the silver screen. While our endeavor is rooted in the steadfast principles of scientific inquiry, we cannot help but revel in the paradoxical union of environmental quality and Hollywood magnificence.
Our endeavor beckons us to explore the interplay between Seneca's atmospheric milieu and the blockbuster phenomenon, teasing out the subtle nuances that influence the trajectory of box office triumphs. In doing so, we are reminded of the poetic dance of science and storytelling, where the dance floor is adorned with scatter plots and regression models instead of gossamer gowns and polished shoes.
Join us as we venture into this uncharted territory, where the realms of air pollution and cinematic grandeur converge in a dazzling display of statistical prowess and unbridled curiosity. In the words of the immortal bard, "All the world's a stage," and indeed, our stage is set with data points and celluloid dreams, beckoning us to unravel the secrets of Seneca's smog and the silver screen.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The methodology employed in this study harnessed an eclectic array of statistical techniques and fanciful data wrangling to navigate the enigmatic terrain of air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and its potential relationship with the box office performance of the top movie of the year. We embarked on this curious expedition armed with a plethora of data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and The Numbers, lending us a panoramic view of atmospheric compositions and cinematic triumphs from 1995 to 2007.
To quantify the atmospheric disturbances and whimsical emissions within Seneca, we earnestly engaged in an elaborate spectacle of cross-referencing and data validation, akin to the harmonious orchestration of a cinematic masterpiece. Utilizing air quality indices, pollutant levels, and meteorological conditions, we concocted an intricate concoction of statistics and witticisms, drizzling in the tantalizing essence of Gaussian distributions and regression analyses.
In parallel, our pursuit of cinematic glory led us to concoct a titillating medley of box office revenues, ticket sales, and silver screen conquests, all harmoniously interwoven with the grandeur of t-tests and confidence intervals. We cautiously pruned outliers and polished our data, much like a discerning director refining their cast for the perfect performance, ensuring that our analyses encapsulated the true essence of box office magnetism.
With both arms laden with the treasures of environmental data and cinematic exploits, we embarked on a waltz of correlation analyses and multivariate models, teasing out the intricate interplay between atmospheric whims and the irresistible allure of the silver screen. This enthralling dance of statistics and celluloid dreams was underscored with robustness checks and sensitivity analyses, ensuring that our findings shimmered with statistical significance and cinematic splendor.
In essence, our methodology encapsulated the essence of a whimsical laboratory, where the whimsy of environmental metrics merged with the enigma of filmic triumphs, culminating in a resplendent tapestry of regression lines and cinematic pizzazz.
Join us as we prance through this captivating methodological expedition, where the terrain is adorned with the elegance of hypothesis testing and the allure of blockbuster enchantment, beckoning us to unravel the secrets of Seneca's smog and the silver screen.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Tickets Sold for the Top Movie of the Year. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and The Numbers .
For the time period 1995 to 2007, you found a correlation 0.7132233, r-squared of 0.5086875, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Smog and the Silver Screen: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Box Office Performance of the Top Movie of the Year"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper employs sophisticated statistical methods to analyze the potential relationship between air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the number of tickets sold for the year's top movie. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and The Numbers, our research team explores the correlation between atmospheric pollutants and cinematic success. Despite the seriousness of our endeavor, we cannot help but marvel at the unexpected entwining of environmental factors and Hollywood flair. Our findings reveal a notably robust correlation coefficient of 0.7132233 with a significance level of p < 0.01 during the period spanning from 1995 to 2007. We delve into the implications of our results, shedding light on the elusive interplay between air quality and the allure of the silver screen. While our study is grounded in rigorous statistical analysis, we cannot resist the temptation to marvel at the quirky, captivating intersection of environmental data and box office magic.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The enchanting world of cinema has long captivated audiences with its mesmerizing tales of heroism, romance, and space odysseys, but could there be a hidden player in this grand production? As we embark on our journey into the unknown, we find ourselves drawn to the unassuming town of Seneca, South Carolina. Nestled amidst the rolling hills and verdant landscapes, Seneca may not be the first place that comes to mind when one thinks of blockbuster movies or atmospheric pollutants. However, our quest for knowledge knows no bounds, and we are compelled to unravel the cosmic tapestry that weaves together air pollution and the silver screen.
Our pursuit begins with the ever-elusive phenomenon of air pollution, a subject that often conjures images of faceless industrial complexes and bustling urban centers. However, within the tranquil confines of Seneca, a subtle dance of atmospheric chemistry unfolds, offering an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. The marriage of environmental data and box office triumphs may seem an improbable match, akin to blending oil and water, but as the adage goes, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.
As intrepid researchers, we find ourselves grappling with the enigmatic nature of film success, seeking to untangle the web of variables that shape the fates of cinematic endeavors. With a twinkle of statistical wizardry and a dash of empirical inquiry, we set forth to examine the correlation between air quality and the dazzling allure of the silver screen. While our endeavor is rooted in the steadfast principles of scientific inquiry, we cannot help but revel in the paradoxical union of environmental quality and Hollywood magnificence.
Our endeavor beckons us to explore the interplay between Seneca's atmospheric milieu and the blockbuster phenomenon, teasing out the subtle nuances that influence the trajectory of box office triumphs. In doing so, we are reminded of the poetic dance of science and storytelling, where the dance floor is adorned with scatter plots and regression models instead of gossamer gowns and polished shoes.
Join us as we venture into this uncharted territory, where the realms of air pollution and cinematic grandeur converge in a dazzling display of statistical prowess and unbridled curiosity. In the words of the immortal bard, "All the world's a stage," and indeed, our stage is set with data points and celluloid dreams, beckoning us to unravel the secrets of Seneca's smog and the silver screen.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis yielded a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.7132233 between air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina and the number of tickets sold for the top movie of the year during the years 1995 to 2007. This correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.5086875, indicating that approximately 50.8% of the variability in ticket sales can be explained by variations in air pollution levels. With a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings point to a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.
The correlation is vividly illustrated in Fig. 1, where a scatterplot displays the tight coupling of air pollution and cinematic success. The connection between the two variables is not just a product of chance—it's as real as the tangible excitement of a blockbuster movie premiere. The robust correlation coefficient speaks volumes about the intriguing interplay between atmospheric quality and box office triumphs. It's as if the ethereal dance of air particles in Seneca's atmosphere has choreographed a mesmerizing performance on the silver screen.
Our results beckon us to ponder the subtle interconnections between Seneca's air pollution and the allure of the cinema. They serve as a reminder that statistical analysis, like a compelling movie plot, can unfold unexpected twists and turns. While our study is firmly rooted in the principles of empirical inquiry, we cannot help but marvel at the whimsical symmetry between environmental variables and the razzle-dazzle of Hollywood. This statistical exploration unearths the captivating saga of Seneca's smog and the silver screen, highlighting the unlikely bond that ties together a tranquil town and the glitz and glamour of the film industry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Tickets Sold for the Top Movie of the Year. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"Smog and the Silver Screen: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Box Office Performance of the Top Movie of the Year"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper employs sophisticated statistical methods to analyze the potential relationship between air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the number of tickets sold for the year's top movie. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and The Numbers, our research team explores the correlation between atmospheric pollutants and cinematic success. Despite the seriousness of our endeavor, we cannot help but marvel at the unexpected entwining of environmental factors and Hollywood flair. Our findings reveal a notably robust correlation coefficient of 0.7132233 with a significance level of p < 0.01 during the period spanning from 1995 to 2007. We delve into the implications of our results, shedding light on the elusive interplay between air quality and the allure of the silver screen. While our study is grounded in rigorous statistical analysis, we cannot resist the temptation to marvel at the quirky, captivating intersection of environmental data and box office magic.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith (2010) conducted a comprehensive study on air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina, examining various atmospheric pollutants and their impact on the local environment. The authors found a significant increase in particulate matter during peak traffic hours, shedding light on the intersection of vehicular emissions and air quality. Moreover, Doe (2013) delved into the enchanting world of cinematic phenomena, exploring the intricacies of box office success and audience reception. Their research illuminated the multifaceted factors that contribute to a movie's commercial triumph, ranging from marketing strategies to audience demographics.
Turning to non-fiction references, the work of Jones (2015) provided valuable insights into the economic implications of environmental regulations in small towns, offering a nuanced perspective on the delicate balance between industry and ecological sustainability. Furthermore, "The Economics of Clean Air" by Lester (2017) presented a compelling discourse on the societal costs of air pollution, delving into the far-reaching consequences of environmental degradation.
In the realm of fiction, "Smoke and Mirrors" by Thompson (2012) captivated readers with its compelling narrative set amidst a backdrop of industrial intrigue and atmospheric unrest. Similarly, "The Smog Siren" by Patel (2016) wove a tale of environmental activism and cinematic splendor, blurring the boundaries between reality and imagination.
Beyond the traditional academic sources, our literature review encompassed an unconventional exploration, delving into the whispering aisles of the local library and the hallowed digital archives of internet forums. In a serendipitous turn of events, our research team stumbled upon the profound wisdom encapsulated within the cryptic tapestry of CVS receipts, each offering a glimpse into the whimsical interplay of consumer behavior and cinematic revelry. While perhaps a departure from scholarly convention, this eccentric foray yielded unexpected insights into the eclectic connections between air pollution and the allure of the silver screen.
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis yielded a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.7132233 between air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina and the number of tickets sold for the top movie of the year during the years 1995 to 2007. This correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.5086875, indicating that approximately 50.8% of the variability in ticket sales can be explained by variations in air pollution levels. With a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings point to a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.
The correlation is vividly illustrated in Fig. 1, where a scatterplot displays the tight coupling of air pollution and cinematic success. The connection between the two variables is not just a product of chance—it's as real as the tangible excitement of a blockbuster movie premiere. The robust correlation coefficient speaks volumes about the intriguing interplay between atmospheric quality and box office triumphs. It's as if the ethereal dance of air particles in Seneca's atmosphere has choreographed a mesmerizing performance on the silver screen.
Our results beckon us to ponder the subtle interconnections between Seneca's air pollution and the allure of the cinema. They serve as a reminder that statistical analysis, like a compelling movie plot, can unfold unexpected twists and turns. While our study is firmly rooted in the principles of empirical inquiry, we cannot help but marvel at the whimsical symmetry between environmental variables and the razzle-dazzle of Hollywood. This statistical exploration unearths the captivating saga of Seneca's smog and the silver screen, highlighting the unlikely bond that ties together a tranquil town and the glitz and glamour of the film industry.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The remarkable strength of the correlation coefficient between air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the number of tickets sold for the top movie of the year has left even our most cynical researchers in awe. If statistics were a show, this finding would be worthy of a standing ovation. Our results align with the prior work of Smith (2010) and Doe (2013), revealing an unexpected but undeniable link between atmospheric pollutants and cinematic allure. The revelation that approximately 50.8% of the variability in ticket sales can be explained by variations in air pollution levels is akin to stumbling upon a plot twist in a thrilling mystery novel—we didn't see it coming, but it's undeniably captivating.
The scatterplot vividly illustrates the close relationship between air pollution and cinematic success, almost as if Seneca's atmosphere has choreographed a captivating performance on the silver screen. It's as if the air particles, too tiny to see without a microscope, have taken on starring roles in the drama of box office triumphs. Our findings not only affirm the robustness of the correlation but also echo the quirky insights from "Smoke and Mirrors" by Thompson (2012) and "The Smog Siren" by Patel (2016), reminding us that reality does indeed mirror fiction in unexpected ways.
Our results also resonate with the unconventional sources we tapped into during our literature review, such as the playful analysis of CVS receipts. It's a reminder that sometimes, inspiration strikes where we least expect it, much like a plot twist in a B-list film. This statistical exploration has uncovered the tale of Seneca's smog and the silver screen, an enchanting narrative that blurs the lines between environmental variables and the glitz and glamour of Hollywood.
As we grapple with the implications of our findings, we are reminded that research, like a well-crafted screenplay, can surprise us with its unexpected twists and turns. Our study not only sheds light on the captivating intersection of environmental data and box office magic but also sparks the imagination, inviting us to explore the whimsical connections between Seneca's air pollution and the allure of the cinema. If science were a blockbuster, this unexpected correlation would be the twist that leaves audiences pondering long after the credits roll.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Tickets Sold for the Top Movie of the Year. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Smog and the Silver Screen: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Box Office Performance of the Top Movie of the Year"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper employs sophisticated statistical methods to analyze the potential relationship between air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the number of tickets sold for the year's top movie. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and The Numbers, our research team explores the correlation between atmospheric pollutants and cinematic success. Despite the seriousness of our endeavor, we cannot help but marvel at the unexpected entwining of environmental factors and Hollywood flair. Our findings reveal a notably robust correlation coefficient of 0.7132233 with a significance level of p < 0.01 during the period spanning from 1995 to 2007. We delve into the implications of our results, shedding light on the elusive interplay between air quality and the allure of the silver screen. While our study is grounded in rigorous statistical analysis, we cannot resist the temptation to marvel at the quirky, captivating intersection of environmental data and box office magic.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The enchanting world of cinema has long captivated audiences with its mesmerizing tales of heroism, romance, and space odysseys, but could there be a hidden player in this grand production? As we embark on our journey into the unknown, we find ourselves drawn to the unassuming town of Seneca, South Carolina. Nestled amidst the rolling hills and verdant landscapes, Seneca may not be the first place that comes to mind when one thinks of blockbuster movies or atmospheric pollutants. However, our quest for knowledge knows no bounds, and we are compelled to unravel the cosmic tapestry that weaves together air pollution and the silver screen.
Our pursuit begins with the ever-elusive phenomenon of air pollution, a subject that often conjures images of faceless industrial complexes and bustling urban centers. However, within the tranquil confines of Seneca, a subtle dance of atmospheric chemistry unfolds, offering an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. The marriage of environmental data and box office triumphs may seem an improbable match, akin to blending oil and water, but as the adage goes, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.
As intrepid researchers, we find ourselves grappling with the enigmatic nature of film success, seeking to untangle the web of variables that shape the fates of cinematic endeavors. With a twinkle of statistical wizardry and a dash of empirical inquiry, we set forth to examine the correlation between air quality and the dazzling allure of the silver screen. While our endeavor is rooted in the steadfast principles of scientific inquiry, we cannot help but revel in the paradoxical union of environmental quality and Hollywood magnificence.
Our endeavor beckons us to explore the interplay between Seneca's atmospheric milieu and the blockbuster phenomenon, teasing out the subtle nuances that influence the trajectory of box office triumphs. In doing so, we are reminded of the poetic dance of science and storytelling, where the dance floor is adorned with scatter plots and regression models instead of gossamer gowns and polished shoes.
Join us as we venture into this uncharted territory, where the realms of air pollution and cinematic grandeur converge in a dazzling display of statistical prowess and unbridled curiosity. In the words of the immortal bard, "All the world's a stage," and indeed, our stage is set with data points and celluloid dreams, beckoning us to unravel the secrets of Seneca's smog and the silver screen.
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis yielded a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.7132233 between air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina and the number of tickets sold for the top movie of the year during the years 1995 to 2007. This correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.5086875, indicating that approximately 50.8% of the variability in ticket sales can be explained by variations in air pollution levels. With a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings point to a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.
The correlation is vividly illustrated in Fig. 1, where a scatterplot displays the tight coupling of air pollution and cinematic success. The connection between the two variables is not just a product of chance—it's as real as the tangible excitement of a blockbuster movie premiere. The robust correlation coefficient speaks volumes about the intriguing interplay between atmospheric quality and box office triumphs. It's as if the ethereal dance of air particles in Seneca's atmosphere has choreographed a mesmerizing performance on the silver screen.
Our results beckon us to ponder the subtle interconnections between Seneca's air pollution and the allure of the cinema. They serve as a reminder that statistical analysis, like a compelling movie plot, can unfold unexpected twists and turns. While our study is firmly rooted in the principles of empirical inquiry, we cannot help but marvel at the whimsical symmetry between environmental variables and the razzle-dazzle of Hollywood. This statistical exploration unearths the captivating saga of Seneca's smog and the silver screen, highlighting the unlikely bond that ties together a tranquil town and the glitz and glamour of the film industry.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our investigation into the relationship between air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina and the number of tickets sold for the year's top movie has uncovered a statistically significant correlation, much like a surprising plot twist in a blockbuster film. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.7132233, akin to a leading actor's standout performance, demonstrates a compelling link between atmospheric pollutants and cinematic success. Our research has unveiled the enchanting dance of environmental factors and Hollywood allure, a tale as captivating as any silver screen spectacle.
Despite the seriousness of our research, we cannot help but be amused by the unforeseen entanglement of seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if Seneca's smog and the silver screen have formed an unlikely partnership, akin to a duo in a buddy comedy that steals the show against all odds. The 50.8% of variability in ticket sales explained by variations in air pollution levels is a statistic as staggering as a box office record, leaving us marveling at the whimsical twists and turns of statistical inquiry.
While our study may appear to delve into the esoteric realm of statistical analysis and atmospheric dynamics, we remain lighthearted in our appreciation of the unexpected synergy between air quality and Hollywood's glitz and glamour. As much as we are drawn to further exploration of this intriguing connection, our findings robustly assert that no more research is needed in this area. After all, as they say in Hollywood, we've already found our perfect box office match!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Smog and the Silver Screen: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Box Office Performance of the Top Movie of the Year. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Environmental Entertainment Research
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Smog and the Silver Screen: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Box Office Performance of the Top Movie of the Year. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Center for Cinematic Environmental Research
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Smog and the Silver Screen: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Box Office Performance of the Top Movie of the Year with an abstract of This paper employs sophisticated statistical methods to analyze the potential relationship between air pollution levels in Seneca, South Carolina, and the number of tickets sold for the year's top movie. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and The Numbers, our research team explores the correlation between atmospheric pollutants and cinematic success. Despite the seriousness of our endeavor, we cannot help but marvel at the unexpected entwining of environmental factors and Hollywood flair. Our findings reveal a notably robust correlation coefficient of 0.7132233 with a significance level of p < 0.01 during the period spanning from 1995 to 2007. We delve into the implications of our results, shedding light on the elusive interplay between air quality and the allure of the silver screen. While our study is grounded in rigorous statistical analysis, we cannot resist the temptation to marvel at the quirky, captivating intersection of environmental data and box office magic.
ChatGPT:
smog, air pollution, Seneca, South Carolina, box office performance, movie tickets, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, atmospheric pollutants, Environmental Protection Agency, The Numbers
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Air pollution in Seneca, South CarolinaDetailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Seneca, SC
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina
Tickets Sold for the Top Movie of the Year
Source: The Numbers
See what else correlates with Tickets Sold for the Top Movie of the Year
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.5086875 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 50.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Tickets Sold for the Top Movie of the Year) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina) over the 13 years from 1995 through 2007.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0062. 0.0061997734926736645000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.71 in 0.62% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 161 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.27, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | |
Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina (Bad air quality days) | 0.002849 | 0 | 0 | 0.0222841 | 0.0139276 | 0.00316456 | 0 | 0.0175439 | 0 | 0 | 0.00278552 | 0 | 0.00277008 |
Tickets Sold for the Top Movie of the Year (Tickets sold) | 42298400 | 69258800 | 54489600 | 94524300 | 84732900 | 47006900 | 51519400 | 69484700 | 56337400 | 70285200 | 59323300 | 64628400 | 48914300 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.002849,0,0,0.0222841,0.0139276,0.00316456,0,0.0175439,0,0,0.00278552,0,0.00277008,])
array_2 = np.array([42298400,69258800,54489600,94524300,84732900,47006900,51519400,69484700,56337400,70285200,59323300,64628400,48914300,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina"
array_2_name = "Tickets Sold for the Top Movie of the Year"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina
- Line chart for only Tickets Sold for the Top Movie of the Year
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Smog and the Silver Screen: A Statistical Analysis of Air Pollution in Seneca, South Carolina and Box Office Performance of the Top Movie of the Year
Your rating skills are top-notch!
Correlation ID: 3814 · Black Variable ID: 22124 · Red Variable ID: 543