about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,696 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Liquefied petroleum gas used in Germany, West and the second variable is Points scored by the Chicago Bears.  The chart goes from 1980 to 1990, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The extra LPG in the air is giving the Bears' offensive line a fiery boost, propelling them to score more points than ever before! Or maybe it's just sparking some explosive plays on the field, either way, it's a gas-powered touchdown party!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a futuristic stadium with a cyberpunk aesthetic, featuring the Chicago Bears playing at Soldier Field in Chicago. In the scene, a trail of Liquefied Petroleum Gas from Germany, West drifts across the field. As the gas molecules reach the players, they gain an extra burst of energy, darting across the field with enhanced agility. The atmosphere is electrified with the aroma of victory blending with the gas fumes, propelling the Bears to score more points. The stadium is illuminated with neon lights, and the players exhibit enhanced speed and power, creating a dynamic and visually gripping spectacle. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Liquefied petroleum gas used in Germany, West and Points scored by the Chicago Bears. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Magic realism A scene from Skyrim Voxel art Charcoal Cyberpunk
ChatGPT: Cyberpunk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Liquefied petroleum gas used in Germany, West and Points scored by the Chicago Bears, in the following situation: Because as Liquefied petroleum gas usage in Germany, West increased, it led to an uptick in the Bears' performance. You see, the whiff of gas molecules from across the ocean actually tickled the Bears' noses, making them more alert and agile on the field. It's like a gas-powered boost for their game! Plus, the smell of victory must have mingled with the gas fumes, creating a winning aroma that fueled their success. So, it's not just their plays that are explosive – it's the gas-fueled inspiration from afar!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Imagine the Chicago Bears playing at Soldier Field in Chicago, with a trail of Liquefied petroleum gas from Germany, West drifting across the field. As the gas molecules reach the players, they seem to gain an extra burst of energy, darting across the field with enhanced agility. The aroma of victory blends with the gas fumes, creating a winning atmosphere that propels the Bears to score more points.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyberpunk ] and depicting this scene: Imagine the Chicago Bears playing at Soldier Field in Chicago, with a trail of Liquefied petroleum gas from Germany, West drifting across the field. As the gas molecules reach the players, they seem to gain an extra burst of energy, darting across the field with enhanced agility. The aroma of victory blends with the gas fumes, creating a winning atmosphere that propels the Bears to score more points. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a futuristic stadium with a cyberpunk aesthetic, featuring the Chicago Bears playing at Soldier Field in Chicago. In the scene, a trail of Liquefied Petroleum Gas from Germany, West drifts across the field. As the gas molecules reach the players, they gain an extra burst of energy, darting across the field with enhanced agility. The atmosphere is electrified with the aroma of victory blending with the gas fumes, propelling the Bears to score more points. The stadium is illuminated with neon lights, and the players exhibit enhanced speed and power, creating a dynamic and visually gripping spectacle.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Liquefied petroleum gas used in Germany, West caused Points scored by the Chicago Bears to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Gasping for Victory: The Propane Scoring Connection

The Journal of Combustion Chemistry and Propane Physics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Liquefied petroleum gas used in Germany, West and Points scored by the Chicago Bears. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7277778 and p < 0.05 for 1980 to 1990.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Gasping for Victory: The Propane Scoring Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears during the years 1980 to 1990. Our research team took the plunge into the depths of data from the Energy Information Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com to explore this unexpected connection. To our surprise, we found a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7277778 and a p-value less than 0.05, indicating a statistically significant relationship.

The correlation may seem "heating up" the pitch, but we assure you, it's not just a hot air. Our findings suggest that as the LPG usage in Germany, West increased, so did the points scored by the Chicago Bears. As the saying goes, "When the gas is on, the points aren't far-gas," and our data supports this notion.

Despite the initial skepticism, our research sheds light on an unexplored area of connection between energy consumption and athletic performance, demonstrating that sometimes, the most unexpected relationships can unfold. So, next time you watch a Bears game, remember, it's not just their strategy, it's the gas that's "fueling" their success.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Liquefied petroleum gas used in Germany, West and Points scored by the Chicago Bears. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Gasping for Victory: The Propane Scoring Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears during the years 1980 to 1990. Our research team took the plunge into the depths of data from the Energy Information Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com to explore this unexpected connection. To our surprise, we found a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7277778 and a p-value less than 0.05, indicating a statistically significant relationship.

The correlation may seem "heating up" the pitch, but we assure you, it's not just a hot air. Our findings suggest that as the LPG usage in Germany, West increased, so did the points scored by the Chicago Bears. As the saying goes, "When the gas is on, the points aren't far-gas," and our data supports this notion.

Despite the initial skepticism, our research sheds light on an unexplored area of connection between energy consumption and athletic performance, demonstrating that sometimes, the most unexpected relationships can unfold. So, next time you watch a Bears game, remember, it's not just their strategy, it's the gas that's "fueling" their success.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between energy consumption and athletic performance has long been a topic of interest among researchers and sports enthusiasts alike. While traditional sports physiology has focused on the impact of diet, training regimens, and psychological factors on athlete performance, our study takes a rather unconventional route by examining the connection between the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears.

Fueling our curiosity, this paper seeks to unravel the propane-scoring connection that has mystified and amused many sports analysts. As we set out on this endeavor, we couldn't help but think, "Did the Bears' scoring success have a gas-tly surprise waiting for us?"

Previous studies have highlighted the influence of environmental factors on athletic performance, emphasizing the importance of temperature, altitude, and humidity. However, our investigation takes an out-of-the-box approach, embracing the unexpected and the seemingly absurd. After all, as the old adage goes, "When in doubt, just take a whiff of that LPG!"

With tongue-in-cheek seriousness, we embarked on an analysis of LPG consumption data in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears during the years 1980 to 1990. As we dived deep into the statistics and charts, we couldn't help but chuckle at the thought of a propane tank lining up for a touchdown, ready to "ignite" the scoreboard.

Now, esteemed reader, prepare to witness the unveiling of a correlation that is no laughing matter – the statistical relationship between LPG usage and the Bears' scoring prowess. Our findings bring a touch of levity to an often serious field, proving that even the most unlikely pairings can yield fascinating insights.

So, fasten your seat belts as we embark on a journey to explore the peculiar intersection of energy consumption and athletic achievement, where the unexpected connection between LPG and touchdowns leaves us pondering the age-old question – does success truly depend on "gas" mileage?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Liquefied petroleum gas used in Germany, West and Points scored by the Chicago Bears. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Gasping for Victory: The Propane Scoring Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears during the years 1980 to 1990. Our research team took the plunge into the depths of data from the Energy Information Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com to explore this unexpected connection. To our surprise, we found a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7277778 and a p-value less than 0.05, indicating a statistically significant relationship.

The correlation may seem "heating up" the pitch, but we assure you, it's not just a hot air. Our findings suggest that as the LPG usage in Germany, West increased, so did the points scored by the Chicago Bears. As the saying goes, "When the gas is on, the points aren't far-gas," and our data supports this notion.

Despite the initial skepticism, our research sheds light on an unexplored area of connection between energy consumption and athletic performance, demonstrating that sometimes, the most unexpected relationships can unfold. So, next time you watch a Bears game, remember, it's not just their strategy, it's the gas that's "fueling" their success.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between energy consumption and athletic performance has long been a topic of interest among researchers and sports enthusiasts alike. While traditional sports physiology has focused on the impact of diet, training regimens, and psychological factors on athlete performance, our study takes a rather unconventional route by examining the connection between the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears.
Fueling our curiosity, this paper seeks to unravel the propane-scoring connection that has mystified and amused many sports analysts. As we set out on this endeavor, we couldn't help but think, "Did the Bears' scoring success have a gas-tly surprise waiting for us?"
Previous studies have highlighted the influence of environmental factors on athletic performance, emphasizing the importance of temperature, altitude, and humidity. However, our investigation takes an out-of-the-box approach, embracing the unexpected and the seemingly absurd. After all, as the old adage goes, "When in doubt, just take a whiff of that LPG!"
With tongue-in-cheek seriousness, we embarked on an analysis of LPG consumption data in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears during the years 1980 to 1990. As we dived deep into the statistics and charts, we couldn't help but chuckle at the thought of a propane tank lining up for a touchdown, ready to "ignite" the scoreboard.
Now, esteemed reader, prepare to witness the unveiling of a correlation that is no laughing matter – the statistical relationship between LPG usage and the Bears' scoring prowess. Our findings bring a touch of levity to an often serious field, proving that even the most unlikely pairings can yield fascinating insights.
So, fasten your seat belts as we embark on a journey to explore the peculiar intersection of energy consumption and athletic achievement, where the unexpected connection between LPG and touchdowns leaves us pondering the age-old question – does success truly depend on "gas" mileage?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Several studies have delved into the relationship between energy consumption and athletic performance. Smith et al. (2015) demonstrated the impact of environmental factors such as temperature and humidity on athlete endurance, while Doe and Jones (2018) explored the influence of diet and nutrition on sports performance. However, our study takes an unconventional approach by examining the connection between Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) usage in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears during the period of 1980 to 1990.

In "Gas and Games," Smith and Doe (2017) discuss the potential correlation between fuel consumption and sports outcomes, highlighting the need for further research in this unique area. Meanwhile, Jones et al. (2019) examined the psychological factors affecting team performance in athletics, acknowledging the need to consider unexpected variables that may contribute to success on the field.

But as we delve into the depths of this unlikely relationship, we can't help but add a hearty "propane" to our research. It seems that the Bears' scoring success is not just a matter of Xs and Os, but rather, LPGs and touchdowns, leaving us gasping for more explanations.

In "Propane and Points: An Unlikely Journey," Mayfield (2020) takes a humorous yet insightful approach to investigating the potential link between gas consumption and team sports performance. Despite the initial skepticism from the scientific community, our research team embraced the challenge, eager to uncover the mysteries lurking behind the propane-scoring connection.

As we wade through the literature, it becomes clear that the laughter is not just a byproduct of our research; it's a fundamental component. After all, who would have thought that a gas as unassuming as LPG could hold the key to unlocking the Bears' success on the field? It's almost "un-bear"-lievable, isn't it?

Applying a lighthearted lens to this investigation, we stumbled upon "The Propane Paradox" by Dickens (2018), a work of fiction that humorously explores the unforeseen impact of energy on sports performance. While the author's intention may be purely comedic, we cannot dismiss the possibility that truth may be hidden in jest.

Let's not forget the wise words of the great physicist, Sir Isaac Bear-ton: "For every action, there is an equal and opposite gas-ction." With this in mind, we challenge the traditional boundaries of research and welcome a sprinkle of whimsy into the world of academic inquiry. After all, what's the point of academia if we can't have a little fun along the way?

In the world of children's television, "The Propane Pals" and "Touchdown Tales with Tanky the Tank" aren't just innocent cartoons—they're potential sources of inspiration for our offbeat exploration. As we embrace the unexpected in our pursuit of knowledge, we invite you to join us on this merry journey through the land of LPG and touchdowns. Who knows, perhaps the Chicago Bears truly are the "Propane Powerhouses" of the NFL!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Liquefied petroleum gas used in Germany, West and Points scored by the Chicago Bears. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com . You used data from 1980 to 1990

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Gasping for Victory: The Propane Scoring Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears during the years 1980 to 1990. Our research team took the plunge into the depths of data from the Energy Information Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com to explore this unexpected connection. To our surprise, we found a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7277778 and a p-value less than 0.05, indicating a statistically significant relationship.

The correlation may seem "heating up" the pitch, but we assure you, it's not just a hot air. Our findings suggest that as the LPG usage in Germany, West increased, so did the points scored by the Chicago Bears. As the saying goes, "When the gas is on, the points aren't far-gas," and our data supports this notion.

Despite the initial skepticism, our research sheds light on an unexplored area of connection between energy consumption and athletic performance, demonstrating that sometimes, the most unexpected relationships can unfold. So, next time you watch a Bears game, remember, it's not just their strategy, it's the gas that's "fueling" their success.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between energy consumption and athletic performance has long been a topic of interest among researchers and sports enthusiasts alike. While traditional sports physiology has focused on the impact of diet, training regimens, and psychological factors on athlete performance, our study takes a rather unconventional route by examining the connection between the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears.
Fueling our curiosity, this paper seeks to unravel the propane-scoring connection that has mystified and amused many sports analysts. As we set out on this endeavor, we couldn't help but think, "Did the Bears' scoring success have a gas-tly surprise waiting for us?"
Previous studies have highlighted the influence of environmental factors on athletic performance, emphasizing the importance of temperature, altitude, and humidity. However, our investigation takes an out-of-the-box approach, embracing the unexpected and the seemingly absurd. After all, as the old adage goes, "When in doubt, just take a whiff of that LPG!"
With tongue-in-cheek seriousness, we embarked on an analysis of LPG consumption data in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears during the years 1980 to 1990. As we dived deep into the statistics and charts, we couldn't help but chuckle at the thought of a propane tank lining up for a touchdown, ready to "ignite" the scoreboard.
Now, esteemed reader, prepare to witness the unveiling of a correlation that is no laughing matter – the statistical relationship between LPG usage and the Bears' scoring prowess. Our findings bring a touch of levity to an often serious field, proving that even the most unlikely pairings can yield fascinating insights.
So, fasten your seat belts as we embark on a journey to explore the peculiar intersection of energy consumption and athletic achievement, where the unexpected connection between LPG and touchdowns leaves us pondering the age-old question – does success truly depend on "gas" mileage?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the intriguing correlation between Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) usage in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears, our research employed a mix of serious statistical analysis and a sprinkle of good-natured humor. The data utilized in this study was primarily sourced from the Energy Information Administration for LPG consumption in Germany, West, and Pro-Football-Reference.com for the Chicago Bears' scoring statistics.

Our team of intrepid researchers began with the arduous task of collecting historical LPG consumption data from various sources, a process not unlike solving a puzzle with missing pieces – or in this case, missing British Thermal Units (BTUs). Once the data was amassed, we meticulously analyzed the trends and patterns, channeling our inner Sherlock Holmes to uncover any potential "gas-tastic" insights.

In parallel, we delved into the Pro-Football-Reference.com database, where we navigated through a treasure trove of football statistics like seasoned sailors on uncharted waters. The multitude of variables and player performances provided us with a rich tapestry of data to sift through, akin to searching for a needle in a haystack, with the needle being the link between LPG consumption and the Bears' scoring prowess.

To quantify the relationship between LPG usage and Chicago Bears' points, we employed statistical techniques that would make even the most steadfast mathematician break into a cold sweat. Through rigorous regression analysis, we sought to unravel the underlying connection, and much like a suspenseful thriller, we anxiously awaited the arrival of our protagonist – the correlation coefficient.

In a bid to ensure robust results, we applied a version of the "stats boogie," where we checked for outliers and influential data points that could potentially throw a curveball into our analysis. After all, in the world of statistics, a few rogue data points can certainly "tackle" the reliability of a correlation.

Furthermore, as a nod to the spirit of scientific inquiry, our methodology fostered an atmosphere of lightheartedness, where occasional dad jokes and playful banter were woven into the fabric of our research. After all, who said data analysis couldn't be both rigorous and entertaining?

Ultimately, our concoction of data collection, statistical analysis, and a not-so-subtle sprinkle of humor formed the bedrock of our methodology, paving the way for an investigation that sought to unearth the unexpected link between LPG consumption and the Chicago Bears' scoring spree. So, as we navigated through the sea of data, much like sailors on a quest for treasure, we embarked on a journey where the quest for knowledge was fueled by a generous dose of wit and whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Liquefied petroleum gas used in Germany, West and Points scored by the Chicago Bears. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com .

For the time period 1980 to 1990, you found a correlation 0.7277778, r-squared of 0.5296606, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Gasping for Victory: The Propane Scoring Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears during the years 1980 to 1990. Our research team took the plunge into the depths of data from the Energy Information Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com to explore this unexpected connection. To our surprise, we found a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7277778 and a p-value less than 0.05, indicating a statistically significant relationship.

The correlation may seem "heating up" the pitch, but we assure you, it's not just a hot air. Our findings suggest that as the LPG usage in Germany, West increased, so did the points scored by the Chicago Bears. As the saying goes, "When the gas is on, the points aren't far-gas," and our data supports this notion.

Despite the initial skepticism, our research sheds light on an unexplored area of connection between energy consumption and athletic performance, demonstrating that sometimes, the most unexpected relationships can unfold. So, next time you watch a Bears game, remember, it's not just their strategy, it's the gas that's "fueling" their success.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between energy consumption and athletic performance has long been a topic of interest among researchers and sports enthusiasts alike. While traditional sports physiology has focused on the impact of diet, training regimens, and psychological factors on athlete performance, our study takes a rather unconventional route by examining the connection between the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears.
Fueling our curiosity, this paper seeks to unravel the propane-scoring connection that has mystified and amused many sports analysts. As we set out on this endeavor, we couldn't help but think, "Did the Bears' scoring success have a gas-tly surprise waiting for us?"
Previous studies have highlighted the influence of environmental factors on athletic performance, emphasizing the importance of temperature, altitude, and humidity. However, our investigation takes an out-of-the-box approach, embracing the unexpected and the seemingly absurd. After all, as the old adage goes, "When in doubt, just take a whiff of that LPG!"
With tongue-in-cheek seriousness, we embarked on an analysis of LPG consumption data in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears during the years 1980 to 1990. As we dived deep into the statistics and charts, we couldn't help but chuckle at the thought of a propane tank lining up for a touchdown, ready to "ignite" the scoreboard.
Now, esteemed reader, prepare to witness the unveiling of a correlation that is no laughing matter – the statistical relationship between LPG usage and the Bears' scoring prowess. Our findings bring a touch of levity to an often serious field, proving that even the most unlikely pairings can yield fascinating insights.
So, fasten your seat belts as we embark on a journey to explore the peculiar intersection of energy consumption and athletic achievement, where the unexpected connection between LPG and touchdowns leaves us pondering the age-old question – does success truly depend on "gas" mileage?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In analyzing the relationship between the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears from 1980 to 1990, we found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.7277778. This coefficient signifies a moderate to strong linear relationship between the two variables, akin to the strength of a sturdy propane tank.

The resulting r-squared value of 0.5296606 indicates that approximately 52.97% of the variability in the Bears' points scored can be explained by the variability in LPG consumption in Germany, West. Much like a well-regulated gas flame, this relationship burns brightly and captivates our attention.

Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.05 reinforces the significance of this correlation. It suggests that the observed relationship between LPG usage and the Bears' scoring performance is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance, painting a picture of statistical significance that even the most discerning football fan can appreciate.

Through meticulous analysis and statistical scrutiny, our findings align with the unexpected nature of this peculiar bonding between energy consumption and athletic accomplishment. This correlation stands as a beacon of light in the realm of unpredictable connections, reinforcing the notion that in the grand game of statistical relationships, one should always "trust the process, but verify the gas pressure."

*Insert relevant dad joke*

As visual evidence of this noteworthy correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot depicting the relationship between LPG consumption in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears during the specified period. This graphical representation serves as a testament to the substantial connection discovered, reinforcing the idea that sometimes, even in the world of statistics, "it's all about how you 'propane' your data."

In summary, our research unearthed a surprising and compelling relationship between LPG usage in Germany, West and the scoring performance of the Chicago Bears. This unexpected correlation not only adds a touch of whimsy to the field of athletic analysis but also underscores the potential for unlikely connections to yield meaningful insights. After all, when it comes to statistical relationships, it's not just about the numbers – sometimes, it's about the 'fuel' they bring to the game.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Liquefied petroleum gas used in Germany, West and Points scored by the Chicago Bears. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Gasping for Victory: The Propane Scoring Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears during the years 1980 to 1990. Our research team took the plunge into the depths of data from the Energy Information Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com to explore this unexpected connection. To our surprise, we found a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7277778 and a p-value less than 0.05, indicating a statistically significant relationship.

The correlation may seem "heating up" the pitch, but we assure you, it's not just a hot air. Our findings suggest that as the LPG usage in Germany, West increased, so did the points scored by the Chicago Bears. As the saying goes, "When the gas is on, the points aren't far-gas," and our data supports this notion.

Despite the initial skepticism, our research sheds light on an unexplored area of connection between energy consumption and athletic performance, demonstrating that sometimes, the most unexpected relationships can unfold. So, next time you watch a Bears game, remember, it's not just their strategy, it's the gas that's "fueling" their success.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Several studies have delved into the relationship between energy consumption and athletic performance. Smith et al. (2015) demonstrated the impact of environmental factors such as temperature and humidity on athlete endurance, while Doe and Jones (2018) explored the influence of diet and nutrition on sports performance. However, our study takes an unconventional approach by examining the connection between Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) usage in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears during the period of 1980 to 1990.
In "Gas and Games," Smith and Doe (2017) discuss the potential correlation between fuel consumption and sports outcomes, highlighting the need for further research in this unique area. Meanwhile, Jones et al. (2019) examined the psychological factors affecting team performance in athletics, acknowledging the need to consider unexpected variables that may contribute to success on the field.
But as we delve into the depths of this unlikely relationship, we can't help but add a hearty "propane" to our research. It seems that the Bears' scoring success is not just a matter of Xs and Os, but rather, LPGs and touchdowns, leaving us gasping for more explanations.
In "Propane and Points: An Unlikely Journey," Mayfield (2020) takes a humorous yet insightful approach to investigating the potential link between gas consumption and team sports performance. Despite the initial skepticism from the scientific community, our research team embraced the challenge, eager to uncover the mysteries lurking behind the propane-scoring connection.
As we wade through the literature, it becomes clear that the laughter is not just a byproduct of our research; it's a fundamental component. After all, who would have thought that a gas as unassuming as LPG could hold the key to unlocking the Bears' success on the field? It's almost "un-bear"-lievable, isn't it?
Applying a lighthearted lens to this investigation, we stumbled upon "The Propane Paradox" by Dickens (2018), a work of fiction that humorously explores the unforeseen impact of energy on sports performance. While the author's intention may be purely comedic, we cannot dismiss the possibility that truth may be hidden in jest.
Let's not forget the wise words of the great physicist, Sir Isaac Bear-ton: "For every action, there is an equal and opposite gas-ction." With this in mind, we challenge the traditional boundaries of research and welcome a sprinkle of whimsy into the world of academic inquiry. After all, what's the point of academia if we can't have a little fun along the way?
In the world of children's television, "The Propane Pals" and "Touchdown Tales with Tanky the Tank" aren't just innocent cartoons—they're potential sources of inspiration for our offbeat exploration. As we embrace the unexpected in our pursuit of knowledge, we invite you to join us on this merry journey through the land of LPG and touchdowns. Who knows, perhaps the Chicago Bears truly are the "Propane Powerhouses" of the NFL!

[[RESULTS]]
In analyzing the relationship between the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears from 1980 to 1990, we found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.7277778. This coefficient signifies a moderate to strong linear relationship between the two variables, akin to the strength of a sturdy propane tank.
The resulting r-squared value of 0.5296606 indicates that approximately 52.97% of the variability in the Bears' points scored can be explained by the variability in LPG consumption in Germany, West. Much like a well-regulated gas flame, this relationship burns brightly and captivates our attention.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.05 reinforces the significance of this correlation. It suggests that the observed relationship between LPG usage and the Bears' scoring performance is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance, painting a picture of statistical significance that even the most discerning football fan can appreciate.
Through meticulous analysis and statistical scrutiny, our findings align with the unexpected nature of this peculiar bonding between energy consumption and athletic accomplishment. This correlation stands as a beacon of light in the realm of unpredictable connections, reinforcing the notion that in the grand game of statistical relationships, one should always "trust the process, but verify the gas pressure."
*Insert relevant dad joke*
As visual evidence of this noteworthy correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot depicting the relationship between LPG consumption in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears during the specified period. This graphical representation serves as a testament to the substantial connection discovered, reinforcing the idea that sometimes, even in the world of statistics, "it's all about how you 'propane' your data."
In summary, our research unearthed a surprising and compelling relationship between LPG usage in Germany, West and the scoring performance of the Chicago Bears. This unexpected correlation not only adds a touch of whimsy to the field of athletic analysis but also underscores the potential for unlikely connections to yield meaningful insights. After all, when it comes to statistical relationships, it's not just about the numbers – sometimes, it's about the 'fuel' they bring to the game.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study have illuminated the intriguing relationship between Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) usage in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears during the years 1980 to 1990. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.7277778, coupled with a statistically significant p-value, provides compelling evidence for the existence of a connection between these seemingly disparate variables. It appears that the LPG consumption in Germany, West served as a silent supporter of the Chicago Bears, subtly fueling their scoring success on the field.

In line with the literature review, our results align with prior research that has ventured into the unconventional territory of energy consumption and athletic performance. As was humorously hinted in "The Propane Paradox" by Dickens (2018), the unexpected impact of energy on sports outcomes appears to be more than just a flight of fancy. Our quantitative analysis substantiates the previously speculative notions, illustrating that perhaps, there is indeed "pro-pain" in underestimating the influence of LPG on athletic achievement.

*Insert relevant dad joke: Why did the LPG go to the gym? To get "tonked" up! It seems the Bears have been following suit with their scoring prowess.*

The significant correlation coefficient and p-value underscore the credibility of our findings and reaffirm the potential for uncharted territories of research to yield meaningful and surprising revelations. As the great physicist, Sir Isaac Bear-ton, might jest, "For every action, there is an equal and opposite gas-ction", highlighting the unexpected yet impactful connections that can be uncovered through unconventional inquiry.

Our results hold implications not only for the world of sports analysis but for the broader scope of interdisciplinary research. It emphasizes the need to embrace non-conventional variables and "funnel" them into our analytical frameworks, as demonstrated by the potent effects of LPG consumption on the Chicago Bears' scoring performance. After all, in the world of academic inquiry, sometimes the most unexpected fuel sources can drive us toward new insights and discoveries.

In sum, our study leaves us with the poignant realization that in the game of statistical relationships, one should always be open to the unexpected and sometimes "odorant" lest likely patterns. While our findings may seem to crackle with a unique lightheartedness, they underscore the potential for unconventional connections to yield meaningful insights and complexities that escape traditional analytical models.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Liquefied petroleum gas used in Germany, West and Points scored by the Chicago Bears. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Gasping for Victory: The Propane Scoring Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears during the years 1980 to 1990. Our research team took the plunge into the depths of data from the Energy Information Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com to explore this unexpected connection. To our surprise, we found a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7277778 and a p-value less than 0.05, indicating a statistically significant relationship.

The correlation may seem "heating up" the pitch, but we assure you, it's not just a hot air. Our findings suggest that as the LPG usage in Germany, West increased, so did the points scored by the Chicago Bears. As the saying goes, "When the gas is on, the points aren't far-gas," and our data supports this notion.

Despite the initial skepticism, our research sheds light on an unexplored area of connection between energy consumption and athletic performance, demonstrating that sometimes, the most unexpected relationships can unfold. So, next time you watch a Bears game, remember, it's not just their strategy, it's the gas that's "fueling" their success.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between energy consumption and athletic performance has long been a topic of interest among researchers and sports enthusiasts alike. While traditional sports physiology has focused on the impact of diet, training regimens, and psychological factors on athlete performance, our study takes a rather unconventional route by examining the connection between the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears.
Fueling our curiosity, this paper seeks to unravel the propane-scoring connection that has mystified and amused many sports analysts. As we set out on this endeavor, we couldn't help but think, "Did the Bears' scoring success have a gas-tly surprise waiting for us?"
Previous studies have highlighted the influence of environmental factors on athletic performance, emphasizing the importance of temperature, altitude, and humidity. However, our investigation takes an out-of-the-box approach, embracing the unexpected and the seemingly absurd. After all, as the old adage goes, "When in doubt, just take a whiff of that LPG!"
With tongue-in-cheek seriousness, we embarked on an analysis of LPG consumption data in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears during the years 1980 to 1990. As we dived deep into the statistics and charts, we couldn't help but chuckle at the thought of a propane tank lining up for a touchdown, ready to "ignite" the scoreboard.
Now, esteemed reader, prepare to witness the unveiling of a correlation that is no laughing matter – the statistical relationship between LPG usage and the Bears' scoring prowess. Our findings bring a touch of levity to an often serious field, proving that even the most unlikely pairings can yield fascinating insights.
So, fasten your seat belts as we embark on a journey to explore the peculiar intersection of energy consumption and athletic achievement, where the unexpected connection between LPG and touchdowns leaves us pondering the age-old question – does success truly depend on "gas" mileage?

[[RESULTS]]
In analyzing the relationship between the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears from 1980 to 1990, we found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.7277778. This coefficient signifies a moderate to strong linear relationship between the two variables, akin to the strength of a sturdy propane tank.
The resulting r-squared value of 0.5296606 indicates that approximately 52.97% of the variability in the Bears' points scored can be explained by the variability in LPG consumption in Germany, West. Much like a well-regulated gas flame, this relationship burns brightly and captivates our attention.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.05 reinforces the significance of this correlation. It suggests that the observed relationship between LPG usage and the Bears' scoring performance is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance, painting a picture of statistical significance that even the most discerning football fan can appreciate.
Through meticulous analysis and statistical scrutiny, our findings align with the unexpected nature of this peculiar bonding between energy consumption and athletic accomplishment. This correlation stands as a beacon of light in the realm of unpredictable connections, reinforcing the notion that in the grand game of statistical relationships, one should always "trust the process, but verify the gas pressure."
*Insert relevant dad joke*
As visual evidence of this noteworthy correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot depicting the relationship between LPG consumption in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears during the specified period. This graphical representation serves as a testament to the substantial connection discovered, reinforcing the idea that sometimes, even in the world of statistics, "it's all about how you 'propane' your data."
In summary, our research unearthed a surprising and compelling relationship between LPG usage in Germany, West and the scoring performance of the Chicago Bears. This unexpected correlation not only adds a touch of whimsy to the field of athletic analysis but also underscores the potential for unlikely connections to yield meaningful insights. After all, when it comes to statistical relationships, it's not just about the numbers – sometimes, it's about the 'fuel' they bring to the game.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research findings have illuminated a rather unexpected yet robust correlation between Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) usage in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears from 1980 to 1990. Our statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7277778, symbolizing a connection as solid as a well-maintained propane tank. It's safe to say that this relationship isn't just "fired up" on the field, but statistically significant as well.

Now, let's address the big "propane" tank in the room - the p-value of less than 0.05. This result confirms that the observed association between LPG consumption and the Bears' scoring performance is not a mere chance happening. It's as if statistical fate has brought these two variables together in an unlikely but undeniable union.

In line with the solemnity of academic discourse, we can't help but share a dad joke that's bound to "ignite" a chuckle: Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears! While this may seem unrelated to our research, it's a reminder that unexpected connections can lead to unexpected joys.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.5296606 highlights the substantial portion of the variability in the Bears' points scored that can be accounted for by variations in LPG consumption. It's a bit like saying that more gas in Germany, West means more "firepower" for the Chicago Bears, both literally and figuratively.

In the spirit of academic closure, let's acknowledge that our research has delivered surprising insights within a "gas-tly" realm. However, it seems that there's no need to further "propane" this area of investigation. Our findings stand as a testament to the quirky and unpredictable nature of statistical relationships, reminding us that in the world of sports and energy, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.

In the words of an esteemed philosopher, "When you've seen one propane scoring connection, you've seen them all." With that said, we bid adieu to this curious investigation, leaving the door open for future researchers to venture into uncharted statistical territories.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Gasping for Victory: The Propane Scoring Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Combustion Chemistry and Propane Physics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Gasping for Victory: The Propane Scoring Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Institute for Gas-Driven Innovations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Gasping for Victory: The Propane Scoring Connection with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Germany, West and the points scored by the Chicago Bears during the years 1980 to 1990. Our research team took the plunge into the depths of data from the Energy Information Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com to explore this unexpected connection. To our surprise, we found a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7277778 and a p-value less than 0.05, indicating a statistically significant relationship.
The correlation may seem "heating up" the pitch, but we assure you, it's not just a hot air. Our findings suggest that as the LPG usage in Germany, West increased, so did the points scored by the Chicago Bears. As the saying goes, "When the gas is on, the points aren't far-gas," and our data supports this notion.
Despite the initial skepticism, our research sheds light on an unexplored area of connection between energy consumption and athletic performance, demonstrating that sometimes, the most unexpected relationships can unfold. So, next time you watch a Bears game, remember, it's not just their strategy, it's the gas that's "fueling" their success.

ChatGPT:

Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG), Energy Information Administration, Pro-Football-Reference.com, Chicago Bears, Germany West, energy consumption, athletic performance, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, data analysis, unexpected relationships, propane scoring, sports performance.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Liquefied petroleum gas used in Germany, West
Detailed data title: Volume of liquefied petroleum gas used consumed in Germany, West in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Liquefied petroleum gas used in Germany, West

Points scored by the Chicago Bears
Detailed data title: Total points scored during the year by the Chicago Bears
Source: Pro-Football-Reference.com
See what else correlates with Points scored by the Chicago Bears

Correlation r = 0.7277778 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5296606 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 53% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Points scored by the Chicago Bears) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Liquefied petroleum gas used in Germany, West) over the 11 years from 1980 through 1990.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.011. 0.0111208208183642690000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.73 in 1.1% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 90 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.23, 0.92 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Germany, West (Million Barrels/Day)600068.50584.98478.19388.36976.74780.60777.248
Points scored by the Chicago Bears (Bears points)304253141311325456352356312358348




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([6,0,0,0,68.505,84.984,78.193,88.369,76.747,80.607,77.248,])
array_2 = np.array([304,253,141,311,325,456,352,356,312,358,348,])
array_1_name = "Liquefied petroleum gas used in Germany, West"
array_2_name = "Points scored by the Chicago Bears"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 3696 · Black Variable ID: 24461 · Red Variable ID: 19683
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0