about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,695 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Detroit Tigers' number of lost games in a specific season of the American League and the second variable is The number of librarians in Rhode Island.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Because every time the Tigers won a game, the excitement in Detroit was so contagious that it spread all the way to Rhode Island, prompting some librarians to ditch the quiet shushing for some impromptu celebratory dancing. The domino effect was real, my friend!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that looks like it is a scene from a Disney movie. It depicts a sunny day at the Detroit Tigers' stadium, with the team's scoreboard prominently displaying the number of games they've lost in the season. Nearby, in a tranquil library in Rhode Island, a group of new librarians eagerly welcome visitors, surrounded by shelves of books. The calming atmosphere created by the librarians has drawn an increasing number of visitors, who are finding solace in the world of books amidst the Tigers' struggles on the baseball field. The scene exudes a sense of contrast between the intensity of sports and the serenity of literature, with a touch of hope and resilience. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Detroit Tigers' number of lost games in a specific season of the American League and The number of librarians in Rhode Island. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Futuristic Art nouveau Photorealism Cute cartoon An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Detroit Tigers' number of lost games in a specific season of the American League and The number of librarians in Rhode Island, in the following situation: Because the stress of losing games caused an increase in library visits, which inspired more Rhode Islanders to become librarians to share their love for books and calm the Tigers' bad luck.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: On a sunny day at the Detroit Tigers' stadium, the team's scoreboard shows the number of games they've lost in the season. Nearby, in a tranquil library in Rhode Island, a group of new librarians eagerly welcome visitors, surrounded by shelves of books. The calming atmosphere created by the librarians has drawn an increasing number of visitors, who are finding solace in the world of books amidst the Tigers' struggles on the baseball field.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie ] and depicting this scene: On a sunny day at the Detroit Tigers' stadium, the team's scoreboard shows the number of games they've lost in the season. Nearby, in a tranquil library in Rhode Island, a group of new librarians eagerly welcome visitors, surrounded by shelves of books. The calming atmosphere created by the librarians has drawn an increasing number of visitors, who are finding solace in the world of books amidst the Tigers' struggles on the baseball field. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that looks like it is a scene from a Disney movie. It depicts a sunny day at the Detroit Tigers' stadium, with the team's scoreboard prominently displaying the number of games they've lost in the season. Nearby, in a tranquil library in Rhode Island, a group of new librarians eagerly welcome visitors, surrounded by shelves of books. The calming atmosphere created by the librarians has drawn an increasing number of visitors, who are finding solace in the world of books amidst the Tigers' struggles on the baseball field. The scene exudes a sense of contrast between the intensity of sports and the serenity of literature, with a touch of hope and resilience.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Detroit Tigers' number of lost games in a specific season of the American League caused The number of librarians in Rhode Island to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Link between Detroit Tigers’ Number of Lost Games and the Number of Librarians in Rhode Island: A Statistical Insight

The Journal of Quirky Correlations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Detroit Tigers' number of lost games in a specific season of the American League and The number of librarians in Rhode Island. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Baseball Reference and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8629582 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Link between Detroit Tigers’ Number of Lost Games and the Number of Librarians in Rhode Island: A Statistical Insight

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the Detroit Tigers’ dismal performance in specific seasons of the American League and the number of librarians nestled in the cozy state of Rhode Island. Utilizing data from Baseball Reference and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we crunch the numbers to unveil a connection that will knock your socks off, or should I say, knock your baseball cap off? Our research team discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8629582 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2018, indicating a significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities. It seems that when the Detroit Tigers are striking out on the field, Rhode Island's librarians are quietly shushing away.

A librarian walks into a bar and orders a double entendre. The bartender gives it to her.

Moreover, our findings raise questions about the interplay of sports and traditional occupations, highlighting the potential influence of one on the other. So, while the Tigers may be losing games, it appears that Rhode Island's librarians are winning at silently organizing knowledge. This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the quirky associations that may underpin our socio-cultural and economic systems. Shall we call this intriguing phenomenon the "Tigers-Librarians Effect"? We leave you with this idiosyncratic correlation to ponder, and perhaps a newfound appreciation for the unexpected whimsy that statistical analysis can unveil.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Detroit Tigers' number of lost games in a specific season of the American League and The number of librarians in Rhode Island. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Link between Detroit Tigers’ Number of Lost Games and the Number of Librarians in Rhode Island: A Statistical Insight

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the Detroit Tigers’ dismal performance in specific seasons of the American League and the number of librarians nestled in the cozy state of Rhode Island. Utilizing data from Baseball Reference and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we crunch the numbers to unveil a connection that will knock your socks off, or should I say, knock your baseball cap off? Our research team discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8629582 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2018, indicating a significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities. It seems that when the Detroit Tigers are striking out on the field, Rhode Island's librarians are quietly shushing away.

A librarian walks into a bar and orders a double entendre. The bartender gives it to her.

Moreover, our findings raise questions about the interplay of sports and traditional occupations, highlighting the potential influence of one on the other. So, while the Tigers may be losing games, it appears that Rhode Island's librarians are winning at silently organizing knowledge. This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the quirky associations that may underpin our socio-cultural and economic systems. Shall we call this intriguing phenomenon the "Tigers-Librarians Effect"? We leave you with this idiosyncratic correlation to ponder, and perhaps a newfound appreciation for the unexpected whimsy that statistical analysis can unveil.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As Albert Einstein once said, "The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." Well, if Einstein were alive today, he might have had a ball pondering over the kooky correlation our research has uncovered: the link between the Detroit Tigers' number of lost games in specific American League seasons and the number of librarians in charming Rhode Island. It's a pairing that's as unexpected as finding a librarian at a heavy metal concert.

Now, picture this: a baseball team striving for glory on the field, battling it out in a game of strategy, agility, and precision, while in a far corner of the country, librarians are navigating the labyrinth of literary wonders, guiding seekers of knowledge through the fog of information. It's a clash of worlds that seems as mismatched as a harmonica player in a heavy metal band.

What do you call a Detroit Tigers fan with half a brain? Gifted.

Yet, in the world of statistics, nothing is as it seems. Our initial exploration into the archives of baseball history and labor demographics in the oh-so-Quaker state of Rhode Island unraveled a connection that had us scratching our heads faster than a librarian quizzing a delinquent on overdue fines. We found a correlation that leaves one wondering if there's something in the water, or perhaps the home run derby draws some cosmic forces that impact the Dewey Decimal system.

This unexpected discovery led our research team to embark on a statistical expedition, a quest to uncover the hidden synergies between America's favorite pastime and the guardians of the printed word. It is an exploration that brings to mind writer and humorist Leo Rosten's words, "I cannot believe that the inscrutable universe turns on an axis of suffering." We cannot help but wonder if the woes of the Tigers' seasons hold the key to the enigmatic relationship with Rhode Island's parchment protectors.

Why did the librarian get kicked off the plane? Because it was overbooked.

As we present our findings, brace yourselves for the unexpected. The pursuit of knowledge often leads us to remarkable revelations, and this quirky connection between the Detroit Tigers and the librarians of Rhode Island is no exception. So fasten your seatbelt, or should we say, your baseball glove. We're about to embark on a statistical rollercoaster that will have you pondering the unforeseen whims of correlation and causation. Fasten your seatbelt, or should we say, your baseball glove. We're about to embark on a statistical rollercoaster that will have you pondering the unforeseen whims of correlation and causation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Detroit Tigers' number of lost games in a specific season of the American League and The number of librarians in Rhode Island. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Link between Detroit Tigers’ Number of Lost Games and the Number of Librarians in Rhode Island: A Statistical Insight

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the Detroit Tigers’ dismal performance in specific seasons of the American League and the number of librarians nestled in the cozy state of Rhode Island. Utilizing data from Baseball Reference and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we crunch the numbers to unveil a connection that will knock your socks off, or should I say, knock your baseball cap off? Our research team discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8629582 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2018, indicating a significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities. It seems that when the Detroit Tigers are striking out on the field, Rhode Island's librarians are quietly shushing away.

A librarian walks into a bar and orders a double entendre. The bartender gives it to her.

Moreover, our findings raise questions about the interplay of sports and traditional occupations, highlighting the potential influence of one on the other. So, while the Tigers may be losing games, it appears that Rhode Island's librarians are winning at silently organizing knowledge. This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the quirky associations that may underpin our socio-cultural and economic systems. Shall we call this intriguing phenomenon the "Tigers-Librarians Effect"? We leave you with this idiosyncratic correlation to ponder, and perhaps a newfound appreciation for the unexpected whimsy that statistical analysis can unveil.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As Albert Einstein once said, "The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." Well, if Einstein were alive today, he might have had a ball pondering over the kooky correlation our research has uncovered: the link between the Detroit Tigers' number of lost games in specific American League seasons and the number of librarians in charming Rhode Island. It's a pairing that's as unexpected as finding a librarian at a heavy metal concert.
Now, picture this: a baseball team striving for glory on the field, battling it out in a game of strategy, agility, and precision, while in a far corner of the country, librarians are navigating the labyrinth of literary wonders, guiding seekers of knowledge through the fog of information. It's a clash of worlds that seems as mismatched as a harmonica player in a heavy metal band.
What do you call a Detroit Tigers fan with half a brain? Gifted.
Yet, in the world of statistics, nothing is as it seems. Our initial exploration into the archives of baseball history and labor demographics in the oh-so-Quaker state of Rhode Island unraveled a connection that had us scratching our heads faster than a librarian quizzing a delinquent on overdue fines. We found a correlation that leaves one wondering if there's something in the water, or perhaps the home run derby draws some cosmic forces that impact the Dewey Decimal system.
This unexpected discovery led our research team to embark on a statistical expedition, a quest to uncover the hidden synergies between America's favorite pastime and the guardians of the printed word. It is an exploration that brings to mind writer and humorist Leo Rosten's words, "I cannot believe that the inscrutable universe turns on an axis of suffering." We cannot help but wonder if the woes of the Tigers' seasons hold the key to the enigmatic relationship with Rhode Island's parchment protectors.
Why did the librarian get kicked off the plane? Because it was overbooked.
As we present our findings, brace yourselves for the unexpected. The pursuit of knowledge often leads us to remarkable revelations, and this quirky connection between the Detroit Tigers and the librarians of Rhode Island is no exception. So fasten your seatbelt, or should we say, your baseball glove. We're about to embark on a statistical rollercoaster that will have you pondering the unforeseen whims of correlation and causation. Fasten your seatbelt, or should we say, your baseball glove. We're about to embark on a statistical rollercoaster that will have you pondering the unforeseen whims of correlation and causation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long intrigued statisticians and researchers. Smith et al., in their study "Baseball: A Statistical Analysis of Perplexing Correlations," highlight surprising correlations in the world of baseball, from the number of hot dog buns sold at stadiums to the average length of seventh-inning stretches. Similarly, Doe's analysis in "The Unforeseen: Statistical Anomalies in Sports" uncovers the peculiar correlation between the frequency of weather-related game delays and the consumption of nachos in stadium concession stands. These studies illustrate the captivating nature of statistical analysis in unraveling unexpected connections in the realm of sports and entertainment.

On the other hand, Jones's research in "Occupational Trends and State Populations" provides insight into the demographics and occupational landscape of various states, shedding light on the distribution and trends of traditional occupations such as librarianship. The juxtaposition of these serious studies with what we are about to say next feels like a librarian at a comedy show – unexpected but undeniably entertaining.

Moving on to non-fiction books that intersect with our study, the works of Malcolm Gladwell, particularly "Outliers: The Story of Success," and "Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking," explore the unexpected patterns and phenomena that shape success and decision-making. While not directly related to baseball games and librarian populations, the themes of unforeseen correlations and hidden influences are at the heart of our research findings.

Now, shifting gears to the realm of fiction, Joseph Heller's "Catch-22" and its exploration of paradoxes and absurdities resonates with the unexpected correlation we've uncovered. In a similar vein, Douglas Adams's "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" humorously highlights the eccentricities of the universe, akin to the uncanny connection between the Detroit Tigers' losses and the number of librarians in Rhode Island.

As the literature review takes a playful turn, let's not forget the cinematic world. The wackiness of "Moneyball" echoes the unpredictable nature of statistical analysis in sports, while the enigmatic causation in "The Butterfly Effect" lends itself to pondering the interplay between unrelated variables, much like our Tigers-Librarians Effect.

Forging an unorthodox path in this literature review, we bridge the gap between stodgy statistical analysis and unanticipated hilarity, reflecting the quirky connections that underpin our research. Embracing the unexpected, we embark on a journey that intertwines the serious and the silly, all in the pursuit of uncovering the whimsical associations that shape our world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Detroit Tigers' number of lost games in a specific season of the American League and The number of librarians in Rhode Island. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Baseball Reference and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Link between Detroit Tigers’ Number of Lost Games and the Number of Librarians in Rhode Island: A Statistical Insight

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the Detroit Tigers’ dismal performance in specific seasons of the American League and the number of librarians nestled in the cozy state of Rhode Island. Utilizing data from Baseball Reference and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we crunch the numbers to unveil a connection that will knock your socks off, or should I say, knock your baseball cap off? Our research team discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8629582 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2018, indicating a significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities. It seems that when the Detroit Tigers are striking out on the field, Rhode Island's librarians are quietly shushing away.

A librarian walks into a bar and orders a double entendre. The bartender gives it to her.

Moreover, our findings raise questions about the interplay of sports and traditional occupations, highlighting the potential influence of one on the other. So, while the Tigers may be losing games, it appears that Rhode Island's librarians are winning at silently organizing knowledge. This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the quirky associations that may underpin our socio-cultural and economic systems. Shall we call this intriguing phenomenon the "Tigers-Librarians Effect"? We leave you with this idiosyncratic correlation to ponder, and perhaps a newfound appreciation for the unexpected whimsy that statistical analysis can unveil.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As Albert Einstein once said, "The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." Well, if Einstein were alive today, he might have had a ball pondering over the kooky correlation our research has uncovered: the link between the Detroit Tigers' number of lost games in specific American League seasons and the number of librarians in charming Rhode Island. It's a pairing that's as unexpected as finding a librarian at a heavy metal concert.
Now, picture this: a baseball team striving for glory on the field, battling it out in a game of strategy, agility, and precision, while in a far corner of the country, librarians are navigating the labyrinth of literary wonders, guiding seekers of knowledge through the fog of information. It's a clash of worlds that seems as mismatched as a harmonica player in a heavy metal band.
What do you call a Detroit Tigers fan with half a brain? Gifted.
Yet, in the world of statistics, nothing is as it seems. Our initial exploration into the archives of baseball history and labor demographics in the oh-so-Quaker state of Rhode Island unraveled a connection that had us scratching our heads faster than a librarian quizzing a delinquent on overdue fines. We found a correlation that leaves one wondering if there's something in the water, or perhaps the home run derby draws some cosmic forces that impact the Dewey Decimal system.
This unexpected discovery led our research team to embark on a statistical expedition, a quest to uncover the hidden synergies between America's favorite pastime and the guardians of the printed word. It is an exploration that brings to mind writer and humorist Leo Rosten's words, "I cannot believe that the inscrutable universe turns on an axis of suffering." We cannot help but wonder if the woes of the Tigers' seasons hold the key to the enigmatic relationship with Rhode Island's parchment protectors.
Why did the librarian get kicked off the plane? Because it was overbooked.
As we present our findings, brace yourselves for the unexpected. The pursuit of knowledge often leads us to remarkable revelations, and this quirky connection between the Detroit Tigers and the librarians of Rhode Island is no exception. So fasten your seatbelt, or should we say, your baseball glove. We're about to embark on a statistical rollercoaster that will have you pondering the unforeseen whims of correlation and causation. Fasten your seatbelt, or should we say, your baseball glove. We're about to embark on a statistical rollercoaster that will have you pondering the unforeseen whims of correlation and causation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic correlation between the Detroit Tigers' performance and the number of librarians in the state of Rhode Island, a comprehensive and, let's just say, an unconventional approach was employed. We wrangled data from the vast archives of Baseball Reference and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, embarking on a data-mining odyssey that was as thrilling as a game-winning home run.

First off, we meticulously collected the number of games lost by the Detroit Tigers in each season from 2003 to 2018. This involved digitally traversing the annals of baseball history, which was akin to exploring the fathomless depths of the library stacks. As we combed through the statistical records, we couldn't help but feel like we were on a quest for the elusive golden card catalog – a bit like seeking a rare baseball card amid a sea of trading cards.

Next, to delve into the librarian demographic, we obtained the number of employed librarians in Rhode Island for the same period. This required navigating the labyrinth of labor statistics, a journey that felt like seeking out the most obscure, yet intriguing, volume in the library's collection.

In anticipation of this peculiar correlation, we lovingly referred to our data collection and processing as the "Bat and Book Census." After all, we were attempting to bridge the gap between the battlegrounds of baseball and the tranquil halls of libraries, a venture as daring as trying to organize a bookshelf by the Dewey Decimal system during a pitching duel.

Once the data was in our grasp, we evaluated the correlation using a rather unorthodox statistical method – a technique known among experts (or perhaps just among ourselves) as the "Pitcher-Librarian Analysis." This approach involved staggering through the voluminous spreadsheets like an outfielder in search of a fly ball, carefully calculating the correlation coefficient to measure the strength of the relationship between the Tigers' losses and the number of librarians in Rhode Island. We employed some advanced statistical software to crunch the numbers, a process that felt like trying to decipher a particularly cryptic library classification code.

In addition, we conducted a thorough data validation process, meticulously ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the data. We affectionately called this step the "Reference Check," a quality control endeavor that was as meticulous as a librarian cataloging a collection of ancient manuscripts.

Lastly, we performed a sensitivity analysis to gauge the robustness of our findings. This involved considering external factors that might influence the correlation, such as changes in the American League dynamics or variations in the labor market of Rhode Island. We dubbed this phase the "Curveball Contingency Examination," as we sought to uncover any unexpected twists in the correlation like an unexpected changeup in a baseball game.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Detroit Tigers' number of lost games in a specific season of the American League and The number of librarians in Rhode Island. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Baseball Reference and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.8629582, r-squared of 0.7446968, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Link between Detroit Tigers’ Number of Lost Games and the Number of Librarians in Rhode Island: A Statistical Insight

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the Detroit Tigers’ dismal performance in specific seasons of the American League and the number of librarians nestled in the cozy state of Rhode Island. Utilizing data from Baseball Reference and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we crunch the numbers to unveil a connection that will knock your socks off, or should I say, knock your baseball cap off? Our research team discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8629582 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2018, indicating a significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities. It seems that when the Detroit Tigers are striking out on the field, Rhode Island's librarians are quietly shushing away.

A librarian walks into a bar and orders a double entendre. The bartender gives it to her.

Moreover, our findings raise questions about the interplay of sports and traditional occupations, highlighting the potential influence of one on the other. So, while the Tigers may be losing games, it appears that Rhode Island's librarians are winning at silently organizing knowledge. This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the quirky associations that may underpin our socio-cultural and economic systems. Shall we call this intriguing phenomenon the "Tigers-Librarians Effect"? We leave you with this idiosyncratic correlation to ponder, and perhaps a newfound appreciation for the unexpected whimsy that statistical analysis can unveil.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As Albert Einstein once said, "The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." Well, if Einstein were alive today, he might have had a ball pondering over the kooky correlation our research has uncovered: the link between the Detroit Tigers' number of lost games in specific American League seasons and the number of librarians in charming Rhode Island. It's a pairing that's as unexpected as finding a librarian at a heavy metal concert.
Now, picture this: a baseball team striving for glory on the field, battling it out in a game of strategy, agility, and precision, while in a far corner of the country, librarians are navigating the labyrinth of literary wonders, guiding seekers of knowledge through the fog of information. It's a clash of worlds that seems as mismatched as a harmonica player in a heavy metal band.
What do you call a Detroit Tigers fan with half a brain? Gifted.
Yet, in the world of statistics, nothing is as it seems. Our initial exploration into the archives of baseball history and labor demographics in the oh-so-Quaker state of Rhode Island unraveled a connection that had us scratching our heads faster than a librarian quizzing a delinquent on overdue fines. We found a correlation that leaves one wondering if there's something in the water, or perhaps the home run derby draws some cosmic forces that impact the Dewey Decimal system.
This unexpected discovery led our research team to embark on a statistical expedition, a quest to uncover the hidden synergies between America's favorite pastime and the guardians of the printed word. It is an exploration that brings to mind writer and humorist Leo Rosten's words, "I cannot believe that the inscrutable universe turns on an axis of suffering." We cannot help but wonder if the woes of the Tigers' seasons hold the key to the enigmatic relationship with Rhode Island's parchment protectors.
Why did the librarian get kicked off the plane? Because it was overbooked.
As we present our findings, brace yourselves for the unexpected. The pursuit of knowledge often leads us to remarkable revelations, and this quirky connection between the Detroit Tigers and the librarians of Rhode Island is no exception. So fasten your seatbelt, or should we say, your baseball glove. We're about to embark on a statistical rollercoaster that will have you pondering the unforeseen whims of correlation and causation. Fasten your seatbelt, or should we say, your baseball glove. We're about to embark on a statistical rollercoaster that will have you pondering the unforeseen whims of correlation and causation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

After meticulous data crunching and statistical analysis, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8629582, with an r-squared value of 0.7446968 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2018. Simultaneously, our p-value of less than 0.01 further cemented the robustness of the relationship between the Detroit Tigers’ number of lost games in specific American League seasons and the number of librarians in Rhode Island. It appears that when the Tigers were stumbling on the field, Rhode Island's librarians were steadfastly holding the fort, perhaps whispering tales of perseverance to the literary tomes.

It's not every day that one uncovers a correlation as intriguing as this - it's almost as surprising as finding a book titled "The Joy of Tax Preparation." This partnership between America's cherished pastime and the keepers of knowledge raises questions that are as thought-provoking as they are amusing.

Fig. 1 illustrates the undeniable correlation between these two seemingly incongruous entities, providing a visual representation of the strong relationship our research has uncovered. It's a connection as compelling as peanut butter and jelly, or as the kids say these days, as mesmerizing as a TikTok dance challenge.

This significant correlation leads us to ponder, what unseen forces align the Tigers' fortunes with the abundance of librarians in Rhode Island? It's a conundrum worthy of the greatest minds of our time, or perhaps just a really good sports analyst and a lover of literature.

What did one librarian say to the other librarian? "I could tell you a joke about an overflowing bookshelf, but I wouldn't want to stack the deck."

These results not only provide a whimsical lens through which to view the intersection of sports and traditional occupations but also lay the foundation for further investigations into the unexpectedly synergistic dynamics at play in our society. The "Tigers-Librarians Effect" may have debunked the notion that apples and oranges are the only unrelated entities in the universe and serves as a reminder of the unanticipated wonders that statistical analysis can reveal.

The correlation uncovered in this study prompts us to delve deeper into the potential influences and interactions between seemingly unrelated facets of our world. After all, who would have thought that the ebb and flow of a baseball team's performance could resonate so intricately with the professional landscape of a small but mighty state? It's a puzzle as perplexing as trying to find a quiet corner in a library during storytime.

In conclusion, we leave you with the important realization that statistical analysis, much like the fine art of punning, can lead to delightful and unexpected connections that tickle the intellect and spark curiosity in the quirks of our world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Detroit Tigers' number of lost games in a specific season of the American League and The number of librarians in Rhode Island. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Link between Detroit Tigers’ Number of Lost Games and the Number of Librarians in Rhode Island: A Statistical Insight

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the Detroit Tigers’ dismal performance in specific seasons of the American League and the number of librarians nestled in the cozy state of Rhode Island. Utilizing data from Baseball Reference and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we crunch the numbers to unveil a connection that will knock your socks off, or should I say, knock your baseball cap off? Our research team discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8629582 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2018, indicating a significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities. It seems that when the Detroit Tigers are striking out on the field, Rhode Island's librarians are quietly shushing away.

A librarian walks into a bar and orders a double entendre. The bartender gives it to her.

Moreover, our findings raise questions about the interplay of sports and traditional occupations, highlighting the potential influence of one on the other. So, while the Tigers may be losing games, it appears that Rhode Island's librarians are winning at silently organizing knowledge. This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the quirky associations that may underpin our socio-cultural and economic systems. Shall we call this intriguing phenomenon the "Tigers-Librarians Effect"? We leave you with this idiosyncratic correlation to ponder, and perhaps a newfound appreciation for the unexpected whimsy that statistical analysis can unveil.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long intrigued statisticians and researchers. Smith et al., in their study "Baseball: A Statistical Analysis of Perplexing Correlations," highlight surprising correlations in the world of baseball, from the number of hot dog buns sold at stadiums to the average length of seventh-inning stretches. Similarly, Doe's analysis in "The Unforeseen: Statistical Anomalies in Sports" uncovers the peculiar correlation between the frequency of weather-related game delays and the consumption of nachos in stadium concession stands. These studies illustrate the captivating nature of statistical analysis in unraveling unexpected connections in the realm of sports and entertainment.
On the other hand, Jones's research in "Occupational Trends and State Populations" provides insight into the demographics and occupational landscape of various states, shedding light on the distribution and trends of traditional occupations such as librarianship. The juxtaposition of these serious studies with what we are about to say next feels like a librarian at a comedy show – unexpected but undeniably entertaining.
Moving on to non-fiction books that intersect with our study, the works of Malcolm Gladwell, particularly "Outliers: The Story of Success," and "Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking," explore the unexpected patterns and phenomena that shape success and decision-making. While not directly related to baseball games and librarian populations, the themes of unforeseen correlations and hidden influences are at the heart of our research findings.
Now, shifting gears to the realm of fiction, Joseph Heller's "Catch-22" and its exploration of paradoxes and absurdities resonates with the unexpected correlation we've uncovered. In a similar vein, Douglas Adams's "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" humorously highlights the eccentricities of the universe, akin to the uncanny connection between the Detroit Tigers' losses and the number of librarians in Rhode Island.
As the literature review takes a playful turn, let's not forget the cinematic world. The wackiness of "Moneyball" echoes the unpredictable nature of statistical analysis in sports, while the enigmatic causation in "The Butterfly Effect" lends itself to pondering the interplay between unrelated variables, much like our Tigers-Librarians Effect.
Forging an unorthodox path in this literature review, we bridge the gap between stodgy statistical analysis and unanticipated hilarity, reflecting the quirky connections that underpin our research. Embracing the unexpected, we embark on a journey that intertwines the serious and the silly, all in the pursuit of uncovering the whimsical associations that shape our world.

[[RESULTS]]
After meticulous data crunching and statistical analysis, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8629582, with an r-squared value of 0.7446968 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2018. Simultaneously, our p-value of less than 0.01 further cemented the robustness of the relationship between the Detroit Tigers’ number of lost games in specific American League seasons and the number of librarians in Rhode Island. It appears that when the Tigers were stumbling on the field, Rhode Island's librarians were steadfastly holding the fort, perhaps whispering tales of perseverance to the literary tomes.
It's not every day that one uncovers a correlation as intriguing as this - it's almost as surprising as finding a book titled "The Joy of Tax Preparation." This partnership between America's cherished pastime and the keepers of knowledge raises questions that are as thought-provoking as they are amusing.
Fig. 1 illustrates the undeniable correlation between these two seemingly incongruous entities, providing a visual representation of the strong relationship our research has uncovered. It's a connection as compelling as peanut butter and jelly, or as the kids say these days, as mesmerizing as a TikTok dance challenge.
This significant correlation leads us to ponder, what unseen forces align the Tigers' fortunes with the abundance of librarians in Rhode Island? It's a conundrum worthy of the greatest minds of our time, or perhaps just a really good sports analyst and a lover of literature.
What did one librarian say to the other librarian? "I could tell you a joke about an overflowing bookshelf, but I wouldn't want to stack the deck."
These results not only provide a whimsical lens through which to view the intersection of sports and traditional occupations but also lay the foundation for further investigations into the unexpectedly synergistic dynamics at play in our society. The "Tigers-Librarians Effect" may have debunked the notion that apples and oranges are the only unrelated entities in the universe and serves as a reminder of the unanticipated wonders that statistical analysis can reveal.
The correlation uncovered in this study prompts us to delve deeper into the potential influences and interactions between seemingly unrelated facets of our world. After all, who would have thought that the ebb and flow of a baseball team's performance could resonate so intricately with the professional landscape of a small but mighty state? It's a puzzle as perplexing as trying to find a quiet corner in a library during storytime.
In conclusion, we leave you with the important realization that statistical analysis, much like the fine art of punning, can lead to delightful and unexpected connections that tickle the intellect and spark curiosity in the quirks of our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings indicating a strong correlation between the number of lost games by the Detroit Tigers in specific American League seasons and the number of librarians in Rhode Island provide an intriguing insight into the potential interplay between professional sports and traditional occupations. This discovery not only confirms the whimsical nature of unexpected correlations that have been previously highlighted in the literature but also underscores the significance of exploring unorthodox connections within our socio-cultural and economic landscape.

Drawing from our literature review, which playfully intertwined serious studies with unexpected correlations, it is evident that the correlation we uncovered mirrors the captivating nature of statistical analysis in unraveling surprising connections. Smith et al.’s study on surprising correlations in baseball and Doe’s analysis on anomalies in sports echo the unforeseen associations we've unveiled. It seems that the Tigers' losses and the librarians' presence intertwine in a way that's as confounding as a knotted baseball cap.

Additionally, the reflective themes in Malcolm Gladwell's works and the eccentricities in Joseph Heller's "Catch-22" resonate with the unexpected correlation we've uncovered, emphasizing the idiosyncratic patterns that shape our understanding of success, decision-making, and the quirkiness of the universe. It's almost as though the Tigers' fumbles and the librarians' quiet diligence unfold as a comedic tragedy in the theater of statistical analysis.

Our results have revealed a correlation that is as solid as a baseball bat – or perhaps a sturdy bookshelf at a well-organized library. The unexpected synergy between the Tigers' performance and the librarian population prompts us to contemplate the unseen forces that underpin this peculiar relationship – a puzzle as confounding as a library catalog mysteriously reorganizing itself.

While our study takes a light-hearted approach, the implications of the "Tigers-Librarians Effect" extend beyond mere amusement. The unexpected alignment of these seemingly incongruous entities invites further investigation into the complexities of our socio-cultural and economic systems. It's a bit like solving a riddle while juggling books – both challenging and strangely delightful.

In closing, our research presents an important reminder of the unpredictable wonders that statistical analysis can unveil, and the potential for such analyses to reveal unexpected connections that entertain the mind and spark curiosity. After all, who would have thought that a baseball team's performance could intertwine so intricately with the professional landscape of a small yet mighty state? It's a zany revelation as captivating as a sports game and as quietly satisfying as losing oneself in the pages of a good book.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Detroit Tigers' number of lost games in a specific season of the American League and The number of librarians in Rhode Island. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Link between Detroit Tigers’ Number of Lost Games and the Number of Librarians in Rhode Island: A Statistical Insight

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the Detroit Tigers’ dismal performance in specific seasons of the American League and the number of librarians nestled in the cozy state of Rhode Island. Utilizing data from Baseball Reference and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we crunch the numbers to unveil a connection that will knock your socks off, or should I say, knock your baseball cap off? Our research team discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8629582 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2018, indicating a significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities. It seems that when the Detroit Tigers are striking out on the field, Rhode Island's librarians are quietly shushing away.

A librarian walks into a bar and orders a double entendre. The bartender gives it to her.

Moreover, our findings raise questions about the interplay of sports and traditional occupations, highlighting the potential influence of one on the other. So, while the Tigers may be losing games, it appears that Rhode Island's librarians are winning at silently organizing knowledge. This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the quirky associations that may underpin our socio-cultural and economic systems. Shall we call this intriguing phenomenon the "Tigers-Librarians Effect"? We leave you with this idiosyncratic correlation to ponder, and perhaps a newfound appreciation for the unexpected whimsy that statistical analysis can unveil.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As Albert Einstein once said, "The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once." Well, if Einstein were alive today, he might have had a ball pondering over the kooky correlation our research has uncovered: the link between the Detroit Tigers' number of lost games in specific American League seasons and the number of librarians in charming Rhode Island. It's a pairing that's as unexpected as finding a librarian at a heavy metal concert.
Now, picture this: a baseball team striving for glory on the field, battling it out in a game of strategy, agility, and precision, while in a far corner of the country, librarians are navigating the labyrinth of literary wonders, guiding seekers of knowledge through the fog of information. It's a clash of worlds that seems as mismatched as a harmonica player in a heavy metal band.
What do you call a Detroit Tigers fan with half a brain? Gifted.
Yet, in the world of statistics, nothing is as it seems. Our initial exploration into the archives of baseball history and labor demographics in the oh-so-Quaker state of Rhode Island unraveled a connection that had us scratching our heads faster than a librarian quizzing a delinquent on overdue fines. We found a correlation that leaves one wondering if there's something in the water, or perhaps the home run derby draws some cosmic forces that impact the Dewey Decimal system.
This unexpected discovery led our research team to embark on a statistical expedition, a quest to uncover the hidden synergies between America's favorite pastime and the guardians of the printed word. It is an exploration that brings to mind writer and humorist Leo Rosten's words, "I cannot believe that the inscrutable universe turns on an axis of suffering." We cannot help but wonder if the woes of the Tigers' seasons hold the key to the enigmatic relationship with Rhode Island's parchment protectors.
Why did the librarian get kicked off the plane? Because it was overbooked.
As we present our findings, brace yourselves for the unexpected. The pursuit of knowledge often leads us to remarkable revelations, and this quirky connection between the Detroit Tigers and the librarians of Rhode Island is no exception. So fasten your seatbelt, or should we say, your baseball glove. We're about to embark on a statistical rollercoaster that will have you pondering the unforeseen whims of correlation and causation. Fasten your seatbelt, or should we say, your baseball glove. We're about to embark on a statistical rollercoaster that will have you pondering the unforeseen whims of correlation and causation.

[[RESULTS]]
After meticulous data crunching and statistical analysis, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8629582, with an r-squared value of 0.7446968 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2018. Simultaneously, our p-value of less than 0.01 further cemented the robustness of the relationship between the Detroit Tigers’ number of lost games in specific American League seasons and the number of librarians in Rhode Island. It appears that when the Tigers were stumbling on the field, Rhode Island's librarians were steadfastly holding the fort, perhaps whispering tales of perseverance to the literary tomes.
It's not every day that one uncovers a correlation as intriguing as this - it's almost as surprising as finding a book titled "The Joy of Tax Preparation." This partnership between America's cherished pastime and the keepers of knowledge raises questions that are as thought-provoking as they are amusing.
Fig. 1 illustrates the undeniable correlation between these two seemingly incongruous entities, providing a visual representation of the strong relationship our research has uncovered. It's a connection as compelling as peanut butter and jelly, or as the kids say these days, as mesmerizing as a TikTok dance challenge.
This significant correlation leads us to ponder, what unseen forces align the Tigers' fortunes with the abundance of librarians in Rhode Island? It's a conundrum worthy of the greatest minds of our time, or perhaps just a really good sports analyst and a lover of literature.
What did one librarian say to the other librarian? "I could tell you a joke about an overflowing bookshelf, but I wouldn't want to stack the deck."
These results not only provide a whimsical lens through which to view the intersection of sports and traditional occupations but also lay the foundation for further investigations into the unexpectedly synergistic dynamics at play in our society. The "Tigers-Librarians Effect" may have debunked the notion that apples and oranges are the only unrelated entities in the universe and serves as a reminder of the unanticipated wonders that statistical analysis can reveal.
The correlation uncovered in this study prompts us to delve deeper into the potential influences and interactions between seemingly unrelated facets of our world. After all, who would have thought that the ebb and flow of a baseball team's performance could resonate so intricately with the professional landscape of a small but mighty state? It's a puzzle as perplexing as trying to find a quiet corner in a library during storytime.
In conclusion, we leave you with the important realization that statistical analysis, much like the fine art of punning, can lead to delightful and unexpected connections that tickle the intellect and spark curiosity in the quirks of our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our findings illuminate the rather unexpected yet robust correlation between the Detroit Tigers' number of lost games in specific American League seasons and the number of librarians nestled in the cozy state of Rhode Island. It seems that as the Tigers were striking out on the field, Rhode Island's librarians were quietly shushing away, displaying a connection as strong as the bond between a book and its cover.

This study not only adds a touch of whimsy to the world of statistical analysis but also raises thought-provoking questions about the interplay of sports and traditional occupations. It goes to show that there might be more to a baseball team's performance than meets the eye – perhaps even a cosmic dance between the world of sports and the realm of literary richness.

In light of these findings, it seems that there is no need for further research to establish the significant correlation between these seemingly unrelated entities. After all, we've hit a home run with this study, leaving little room for doubt that when the Tigers are fumbling, Rhode Island's librarians are silently calling the shots.

So, let's raise a toast to the unexpected correlations that statistical analysis can unveil, reminding us that sometimes, truth is stranger than fiction. And on that note, maybe it's time for us to shelve this particular research and head back to the drawing board for other delightful statistical surprises. Just remember, when it comes to surprising connections, there's always more than meets the eye!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Link between Detroit Tigers’ Number of Lost Games and the Number of Librarians in Rhode Island: A Statistical Insight. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Correlations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Link between Detroit Tigers’ Number of Lost Games and the Number of Librarians in Rhode Island: A Statistical Insight. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Advanced Sports and Statistical Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Link between Detroit Tigers’ Number of Lost Games and the Number of Librarians in Rhode Island: A Statistical Insight with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the intriguing correlation between the Detroit Tigers’ dismal performance in specific seasons of the American League and the number of librarians nestled in the cozy state of Rhode Island. Utilizing data from Baseball Reference and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we crunch the numbers to unveil a connection that will knock your socks off, or should I say, knock your baseball cap off? Our research team discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8629582 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2018, indicating a significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities. It seems that when the Detroit Tigers are striking out on the field, Rhode Island's librarians are quietly shushing away.
A librarian walks into a bar and orders a double entendre. The bartender gives it to her.

Moreover, our findings raise questions about the interplay of sports and traditional occupations, highlighting the potential influence of one on the other. So, while the Tigers may be losing games, it appears that Rhode Island's librarians are winning at silently organizing knowledge. This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the quirky associations that may underpin our socio-cultural and economic systems. Shall we call this intriguing phenomenon the "Tigers-Librarians Effect"? We leave you with this idiosyncratic correlation to ponder, and perhaps a newfound appreciation for the unexpected whimsy that statistical analysis can unveil.

ChatGPT:

Detroit Tigers performance, librarians in Rhode Island, correlation, baseball statistics, Bureau of Labor Statistics, sports influence on occupations, quirky associations, socio-cultural and economic systems

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Detroit Tigers' number of lost games in a specific season of the American League
Source: Baseball Reference
See what else correlates with Detroit Tigers' number of lost games in a specific season of the American League

The number of librarians in Rhode Island
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of librarians in Rhode Island
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of librarians in Rhode Island

Correlation r = 0.8629582 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7446968 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 74.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of librarians in Rhode Island) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Detroit Tigers' number of lost games in a specific season of the American League) over the 16 years from 2003 through 2018.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.7E-5. 0.0000168122547219483100000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 0.0017% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 59,480 random variables You don't actually need 59 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.64, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018
Detroit Tigers' number of lost games in a specific season of the American League (Games Lost)119909167748877816774697287759898
The number of librarians in Rhode Island (Librarians)910870730690670730700690690680660630740690830750




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([119,90,91,67,74,88,77,81,67,74,69,72,87,75,98,98,])
array_2 = np.array([910,870,730,690,670,730,700,690,690,680,660,630,740,690,830,750,])
array_1_name = "Detroit Tigers' number of lost games in a specific season of the American League"
array_2_name = "The number of librarians in Rhode Island"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 3695 · Black Variable ID: 369 · Red Variable ID: 13877
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0