Download png, svg
AI explanation
The cleaner air led to an increase in productivity and efficiency, meaning Ohio needed fewer purchasing managers to keep things running smoothly. With less smog to wade through, they could streamline their operations and trim the manager fat.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Disney movie where the city of Dayton is depicted with a pristine skyline. The atmosphere is clear and vibrant, showcasing the absence of pollution. People are shown strolling along the well-maintained streets, their expressions displaying a sense of clarity and contentment. In a refined and elegantly decorated boardroom, a group of purchasing managers is seen engaging in a thoughtful and strategic discussion, embodying a restrained and insightful demeanor. As the scene unfolds, the number of purchasing managers gradually decreases, symbolizing their newfound efficiency in managing budgets amidst the fresh and unpolluted air of Dayton. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Dayton and The number of purchasing managers in Ohio. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Art nouveau Cubism Voxel art An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie a meme
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Dayton and The number of purchasing managers in Ohio, in the following situation: Because with cleaner air, people in Dayton are breathing in fewer toxic fumes, leading to clearer thinking. As a result, the purchasing managers started making smarter decisions and realized they didn't need to buy as much stuff, so their numbers decreased. Who knew cleaner air could lead to cleaner wallets?. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Dayton, the air is noticeably cleaner; the skyline is free from the typical haze of pollution. People are walking around with clearer minds, and the purchasing managers are seen discussing strategy in a boardroom with a thoughtful and restrained approach. The number of purchasing managers is visibly decreasing as they realize more efficient ways to manage their budgets in the clear, fresh air.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie ] and depicting this scene: In Dayton, the air is noticeably cleaner; the skyline is free from the typical haze of pollution. People are walking around with clearer minds, and the purchasing managers are seen discussing strategy in a boardroom with a thoughtful and restrained approach. The number of purchasing managers is visibly decreasing as they realize more efficient ways to manage their budgets in the clear, fresh air. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Disney movie where the city of Dayton is depicted with a pristine skyline. The atmosphere is clear and vibrant, showcasing the absence of pollution. People are shown strolling along the well-maintained streets, their expressions displaying a sense of clarity and contentment. In a refined and elegantly decorated boardroom, a group of purchasing managers is seen engaging in a thoughtful and strategic discussion, embodying a restrained and insightful demeanor. As the scene unfolds, the number of purchasing managers gradually decreases, symbolizing their newfound efficiency in managing budgets amidst the fresh and unpolluted air of Dayton.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Dayton caused The number of purchasing managers in Ohio to decrease.
AI academic paper
The Smoggy Path to Procurement: Unveiling the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Population of Purchasing Managers in Ohio The Journal of Environmental Economics and Procurement Studies Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dayton and The number of purchasing managers in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title seem clever.
Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8664258 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Smoggy Path to Procurement: Unveiling the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Population of Purchasing Managers in Ohio
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the often overlooked but intriguing relationship between air pollution and the number of purchasing managers, aiming to shed light on the potential impact of environmental factors on the professional landscape. Leveraging comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, our research team determined a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8664258 and a significance level of p < 0.01, revealing a striking connection between air quality in Dayton and the population of purchasing managers in the Buckeye State. While our findings evoke more queries than answers, this study serves as a breath of fresh air in the pursuit of understanding the intricate interplay between environmental concerns and professional demographics.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dayton and The number of purchasing managers in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Smoggy Path to Procurement: Unveiling the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Population of Purchasing Managers in Ohio
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the often overlooked but intriguing relationship between air pollution and the number of purchasing managers, aiming to shed light on the potential impact of environmental factors on the professional landscape. Leveraging comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, our research team determined a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8664258 and a significance level of p < 0.01, revealing a striking connection between air quality in Dayton and the population of purchasing managers in the Buckeye State. While our findings evoke more queries than answers, this study serves as a breath of fresh air in the pursuit of understanding the intricate interplay between environmental concerns and professional demographics.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the legendary comedian George Carlin once quipped, "Do you ever notice that anyone driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac?" In a similar vein, we often overlook the impact of air pollution on the professional landscape, blissfully unaware of its potential influence on the population of purchasing managers. Our study sets out to unravel this smog-infused mystery and explore the intricate dance between particulate matter and procurement professionals.
It is a truth universally acknowledged that air pollution poses significant health and environmental hazards. However, what is lesser known is its potential impact on the composition of the labor force, particularly in the field of purchasing management. This research seeks to navigate the labyrinth of pollution data and employment figures, aiming to elucidate the captivating correlation between atmospheric contamination and the number of individuals navigating the labyrinth of procurement processes in Ohio.
Much like discovering a particularly pungent cheese at a neighborhood picnic, our findings elicit a mix of surprise and intrigue. In our detailed analysis spanning nearly two decades, an undeniable connection emerged, akin to the scent of a freshly baked bread wafting through a bustling market square. The correlation coefficient of 0.8664258, coupled with a significance level of p < 0.01, serves as a beacon in the fog of uncertainty, illuminating the connection between Dayton's air quality and the population of purchasing managers in the Buckeye State.
This study is not merely an exercise in statistical acrobatics, but a journey of discovery and revelation. By embracing the complexity of environmental and professional dynamics, we aspire to paint a vivid portrait of the unseen forces shaping the labor landscape, much like an artist capturing the elusive essence of a fleeting sunset. Our inquiry serves as a testament to the enduring interplay between seemingly disparate realms, proving that the "smoggy path to procurement" is a tale worth unraveling.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dayton and The number of purchasing managers in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Smoggy Path to Procurement: Unveiling the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Population of Purchasing Managers in Ohio
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the often overlooked but intriguing relationship between air pollution and the number of purchasing managers, aiming to shed light on the potential impact of environmental factors on the professional landscape. Leveraging comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, our research team determined a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8664258 and a significance level of p < 0.01, revealing a striking connection between air quality in Dayton and the population of purchasing managers in the Buckeye State. While our findings evoke more queries than answers, this study serves as a breath of fresh air in the pursuit of understanding the intricate interplay between environmental concerns and professional demographics.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the legendary comedian George Carlin once quipped, "Do you ever notice that anyone driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac?" In a similar vein, we often overlook the impact of air pollution on the professional landscape, blissfully unaware of its potential influence on the population of purchasing managers. Our study sets out to unravel this smog-infused mystery and explore the intricate dance between particulate matter and procurement professionals.
It is a truth universally acknowledged that air pollution poses significant health and environmental hazards. However, what is lesser known is its potential impact on the composition of the labor force, particularly in the field of purchasing management. This research seeks to navigate the labyrinth of pollution data and employment figures, aiming to elucidate the captivating correlation between atmospheric contamination and the number of individuals navigating the labyrinth of procurement processes in Ohio.
Much like discovering a particularly pungent cheese at a neighborhood picnic, our findings elicit a mix of surprise and intrigue. In our detailed analysis spanning nearly two decades, an undeniable connection emerged, akin to the scent of a freshly baked bread wafting through a bustling market square. The correlation coefficient of 0.8664258, coupled with a significance level of p < 0.01, serves as a beacon in the fog of uncertainty, illuminating the connection between Dayton's air quality and the population of purchasing managers in the Buckeye State.
This study is not merely an exercise in statistical acrobatics, but a journey of discovery and revelation. By embracing the complexity of environmental and professional dynamics, we aspire to paint a vivid portrait of the unseen forces shaping the labor landscape, much like an artist capturing the elusive essence of a fleeting sunset. Our inquiry serves as a testament to the enduring interplay between seemingly disparate realms, proving that the "smoggy path to procurement" is a tale worth unraveling.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work "The Impact of Air Pollution on Regional Economies," Smith et al. examine the multifaceted effects of air pollution on various economic indicators. While their focus primarily lies in the economic fallout of environmental degradation, their findings shed light on the intricate connections between environmental factors and professional landscapes. Similarly, in "The Labor Force and Environmental Factors," Doe and Jones delve into the understudied relationship between environmental conditions and the composition of the labor force, providing a springboard for our exploration of the connection between air pollution in Dayton and the population of purchasing managers in Ohio.
Transitioning from these serious inquiries, we turn to more lighthearted yet still relevant sources. "Breathless in Dayton" by Clean Air Coalition offers a poignant and, at times, comedic portrayal of the struggles faced by residents in the face of air pollution. This work provides anecdotal evidence that mirrors our research findings, albeit in a more dramatic and less statistically rigorous manner.
Bringing a fictional flair to our review, "The Air Affair" by Pollution Pundit presents a whimsical account of a clandestine romance set against the backdrop of urban smog. While purely fictional, the book encapsulates the essence of our endeavor—to uncover the clandestine connection between air pollution and the professional world, painting a vivid picture of the complexities involved.
In a cinematic interlude, we draw inspiration from the movie "Up in the Air," featuring a charismatic protagonist navigating the intricacies of modern professional life. While the film may not directly explore the correlation between air pollution and purchasing managers, its portrayal of corporate dynamics and the modern workplace serves as a metaphorical backdrop for our research, much like a lively soundtrack enhances the ambiance of a bustling market square.
As we journey through the research landscape, we are reminded of the oft-overlooked interplay between serious inquiry and lighthearted exploration, embracing both the weight of statistical significance and the levity of fictional narratives. With this eclectic mix of sources and inspirations, we embark on our quest to unveil the relationship between air pollution in Dayton and the population of purchasing managers in Ohio, treading the smoggy path to procurement with a sense of curiosity and humor.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dayton and The number of purchasing managers in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Smoggy Path to Procurement: Unveiling the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Population of Purchasing Managers in Ohio
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the often overlooked but intriguing relationship between air pollution and the number of purchasing managers, aiming to shed light on the potential impact of environmental factors on the professional landscape. Leveraging comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, our research team determined a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8664258 and a significance level of p < 0.01, revealing a striking connection between air quality in Dayton and the population of purchasing managers in the Buckeye State. While our findings evoke more queries than answers, this study serves as a breath of fresh air in the pursuit of understanding the intricate interplay between environmental concerns and professional demographics.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the legendary comedian George Carlin once quipped, "Do you ever notice that anyone driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac?" In a similar vein, we often overlook the impact of air pollution on the professional landscape, blissfully unaware of its potential influence on the population of purchasing managers. Our study sets out to unravel this smog-infused mystery and explore the intricate dance between particulate matter and procurement professionals.
It is a truth universally acknowledged that air pollution poses significant health and environmental hazards. However, what is lesser known is its potential impact on the composition of the labor force, particularly in the field of purchasing management. This research seeks to navigate the labyrinth of pollution data and employment figures, aiming to elucidate the captivating correlation between atmospheric contamination and the number of individuals navigating the labyrinth of procurement processes in Ohio.
Much like discovering a particularly pungent cheese at a neighborhood picnic, our findings elicit a mix of surprise and intrigue. In our detailed analysis spanning nearly two decades, an undeniable connection emerged, akin to the scent of a freshly baked bread wafting through a bustling market square. The correlation coefficient of 0.8664258, coupled with a significance level of p < 0.01, serves as a beacon in the fog of uncertainty, illuminating the connection between Dayton's air quality and the population of purchasing managers in the Buckeye State.
This study is not merely an exercise in statistical acrobatics, but a journey of discovery and revelation. By embracing the complexity of environmental and professional dynamics, we aspire to paint a vivid portrait of the unseen forces shaping the labor landscape, much like an artist capturing the elusive essence of a fleeting sunset. Our inquiry serves as a testament to the enduring interplay between seemingly disparate realms, proving that the "smoggy path to procurement" is a tale worth unraveling.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To untangle the knotty web of air pollution and purchasing management, our approach resembled a curious scavenger hunt with data as our treasure. We amassed a trove of information from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, collecting data from the years 2003 to 2022. Our data mining expedition led us through the virtual jungles of cyberspace, where we sifted through an array of spreadsheets and datasets, much like intrepid explorers searching for the elusive treasure of statistical significance.
The criteria for selecting our data sources were akin to choosing ingredients for an elaborate dish, where we sought reliability, comprehensiveness, and a touch of zest. We prioritized datasets with detailed air quality indices and precise measurements of particulate matter in Dayton, Ohio, embracing these metrics as our compass in navigating the labyrinth of atmospheric conditions. Concurrently, we delved into the Bureau of Labor Statistics' archives, seeking employment figures of purchasing managers across the state of Ohio. Carefully sifting through these repositories of professional demographics, we aimed to capture the essence of procurement professionals and their dispersal across the Buckeye State.
Once we gathered our trove of data, we embarked on the voyage of statistical analysis. Our journey resembled a puzzle-solving escapade, as we sifted through the sea of numbers to discern patterns, connections, and anomalies. Employing rigorous quantitative techniques, we calculated correlation coefficients, significance levels, and regression analyses, much like mad scientists concocting the perfect formula to unveil the concealed relationship between environmental particles and occupational pursuits.
To hone our analysis, we engaged in a meticulous process of data cleaning and variable selection, akin to polishing a rough gem to reveal its radiant brilliance. We filtered out erroneous data points and outliers, ensuring the integrity of our statistical inferences remained unsullied. Our methods of analysis were akin to the delicate strokes of an artist's brush, carefully painting the intricate interplay of air pollution and purchasing manager population in Ohio.
Addressing potential confounding factors was a task akin to navigating through a labyrinth of mirrors, where we aimed to untangle the myriad influences that might obscure our findings. Controlling for variables such as economic trends, demographic shifts, and other environmental factors, we sought to isolate the unique impact of air quality on the population of procurement professionals in Ohio. Much like Sherlock Holmes unraveling a complex mystery, we meticulously dissected the layers of potential confounders to expose the elemental thread of connection between smog and procurement.
Our statistical models glistened like a well-polished trophy, embodying the culmination of our analytical prowess. Embracing the nuances of multi-variate regression analyses, we unraveled the intricate interactions between air pollution and purchasing manager population, akin to peeling the layers of an onion to reveal its pungent core. This methodological symphony of statistical acrobatics and data excavation laid the foundation for our compelling findings, illuminating the "smoggy path to procurement" with empirical clarity.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dayton and The number of purchasing managers in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .
For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8664258, r-squared of 0.7506937, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Smoggy Path to Procurement: Unveiling the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Population of Purchasing Managers in Ohio
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the often overlooked but intriguing relationship between air pollution and the number of purchasing managers, aiming to shed light on the potential impact of environmental factors on the professional landscape. Leveraging comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, our research team determined a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8664258 and a significance level of p < 0.01, revealing a striking connection between air quality in Dayton and the population of purchasing managers in the Buckeye State. While our findings evoke more queries than answers, this study serves as a breath of fresh air in the pursuit of understanding the intricate interplay between environmental concerns and professional demographics.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the legendary comedian George Carlin once quipped, "Do you ever notice that anyone driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac?" In a similar vein, we often overlook the impact of air pollution on the professional landscape, blissfully unaware of its potential influence on the population of purchasing managers. Our study sets out to unravel this smog-infused mystery and explore the intricate dance between particulate matter and procurement professionals.
It is a truth universally acknowledged that air pollution poses significant health and environmental hazards. However, what is lesser known is its potential impact on the composition of the labor force, particularly in the field of purchasing management. This research seeks to navigate the labyrinth of pollution data and employment figures, aiming to elucidate the captivating correlation between atmospheric contamination and the number of individuals navigating the labyrinth of procurement processes in Ohio.
Much like discovering a particularly pungent cheese at a neighborhood picnic, our findings elicit a mix of surprise and intrigue. In our detailed analysis spanning nearly two decades, an undeniable connection emerged, akin to the scent of a freshly baked bread wafting through a bustling market square. The correlation coefficient of 0.8664258, coupled with a significance level of p < 0.01, serves as a beacon in the fog of uncertainty, illuminating the connection between Dayton's air quality and the population of purchasing managers in the Buckeye State.
This study is not merely an exercise in statistical acrobatics, but a journey of discovery and revelation. By embracing the complexity of environmental and professional dynamics, we aspire to paint a vivid portrait of the unseen forces shaping the labor landscape, much like an artist capturing the elusive essence of a fleeting sunset. Our inquiry serves as a testament to the enduring interplay between seemingly disparate realms, proving that the "smoggy path to procurement" is a tale worth unraveling.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The results of the data analysis yielded a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8664258, highlighting a strong positive relationship between air pollution in Dayton and the number of purchasing managers in Ohio. The r-squared value of 0.7506937 indicated that approximately 75.07% of the variability in the population of purchasing managers could be explained by the variations in air pollution levels over the period of 2003 to 2022. The significance level of p < 0.01 provided conclusive evidence of the statistical significance of this connection, debunking any notion of this correlation being a mere happenstance.
Upon visual inspection of the data, the tight relationship between air pollution and the population of purchasing managers is vividly demonstrated in Fig. 1. The scatterplot showcases a striking pattern, resembling the scattered breadcrumbs leading to a hidden treasure of insights. This correlation, akin to an unexpected gust of wind in the procurement landscape, encourages further exploration into the intricate web of factors influencing professional demographics.
The findings of this study, much like uncovering an unexpected gem in a pile of rubble, shed light on the often underestimated impact of environmental variables on the composition of the labor force. While the relationship between air pollution in Dayton and the number of purchasing managers in Ohio may seem as surprising as finding a rare coin beneath the sofa cushions, the data unequivocally affirms this connection. This revelation serves as a beacon in the mist, urging researchers and policymakers to consider the potential influence of environmental conditions on professional demographics with the same gravity as an unexpected twist in a riveting novel.
In summary, our investigation unravels a captivating correlation between air quality in Dayton and the population of purchasing managers in Ohio, underscoring the need for a deeper understanding of the intricate interplay between environmental factors and professional demographics. This study, not unlike stumbling upon a hidden chamber in a labyrinth, paves the way for further exploration of the multifaceted dynamics shaping the professional landscape, proving that even the most unexpected connections merit meticulous consideration.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dayton and The number of purchasing managers in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
The Smoggy Path to Procurement: Unveiling the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Population of Purchasing Managers in Ohio
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the often overlooked but intriguing relationship between air pollution and the number of purchasing managers, aiming to shed light on the potential impact of environmental factors on the professional landscape. Leveraging comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, our research team determined a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8664258 and a significance level of p < 0.01, revealing a striking connection between air quality in Dayton and the population of purchasing managers in the Buckeye State. While our findings evoke more queries than answers, this study serves as a breath of fresh air in the pursuit of understanding the intricate interplay between environmental concerns and professional demographics.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work "The Impact of Air Pollution on Regional Economies," Smith et al. examine the multifaceted effects of air pollution on various economic indicators. While their focus primarily lies in the economic fallout of environmental degradation, their findings shed light on the intricate connections between environmental factors and professional landscapes. Similarly, in "The Labor Force and Environmental Factors," Doe and Jones delve into the understudied relationship between environmental conditions and the composition of the labor force, providing a springboard for our exploration of the connection between air pollution in Dayton and the population of purchasing managers in Ohio.
Transitioning from these serious inquiries, we turn to more lighthearted yet still relevant sources. "Breathless in Dayton" by Clean Air Coalition offers a poignant and, at times, comedic portrayal of the struggles faced by residents in the face of air pollution. This work provides anecdotal evidence that mirrors our research findings, albeit in a more dramatic and less statistically rigorous manner.
Bringing a fictional flair to our review, "The Air Affair" by Pollution Pundit presents a whimsical account of a clandestine romance set against the backdrop of urban smog. While purely fictional, the book encapsulates the essence of our endeavor—to uncover the clandestine connection between air pollution and the professional world, painting a vivid picture of the complexities involved.
In a cinematic interlude, we draw inspiration from the movie "Up in the Air," featuring a charismatic protagonist navigating the intricacies of modern professional life. While the film may not directly explore the correlation between air pollution and purchasing managers, its portrayal of corporate dynamics and the modern workplace serves as a metaphorical backdrop for our research, much like a lively soundtrack enhances the ambiance of a bustling market square.
As we journey through the research landscape, we are reminded of the oft-overlooked interplay between serious inquiry and lighthearted exploration, embracing both the weight of statistical significance and the levity of fictional narratives. With this eclectic mix of sources and inspirations, we embark on our quest to unveil the relationship between air pollution in Dayton and the population of purchasing managers in Ohio, treading the smoggy path to procurement with a sense of curiosity and humor.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of the data analysis yielded a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8664258, highlighting a strong positive relationship between air pollution in Dayton and the number of purchasing managers in Ohio. The r-squared value of 0.7506937 indicated that approximately 75.07% of the variability in the population of purchasing managers could be explained by the variations in air pollution levels over the period of 2003 to 2022. The significance level of p < 0.01 provided conclusive evidence of the statistical significance of this connection, debunking any notion of this correlation being a mere happenstance.
Upon visual inspection of the data, the tight relationship between air pollution and the population of purchasing managers is vividly demonstrated in Fig. 1. The scatterplot showcases a striking pattern, resembling the scattered breadcrumbs leading to a hidden treasure of insights. This correlation, akin to an unexpected gust of wind in the procurement landscape, encourages further exploration into the intricate web of factors influencing professional demographics.
The findings of this study, much like uncovering an unexpected gem in a pile of rubble, shed light on the often underestimated impact of environmental variables on the composition of the labor force. While the relationship between air pollution in Dayton and the number of purchasing managers in Ohio may seem as surprising as finding a rare coin beneath the sofa cushions, the data unequivocally affirms this connection. This revelation serves as a beacon in the mist, urging researchers and policymakers to consider the potential influence of environmental conditions on professional demographics with the same gravity as an unexpected twist in a riveting novel.
In summary, our investigation unravels a captivating correlation between air quality in Dayton and the population of purchasing managers in Ohio, underscoring the need for a deeper understanding of the intricate interplay between environmental factors and professional demographics. This study, not unlike stumbling upon a hidden chamber in a labyrinth, paves the way for further exploration of the multifaceted dynamics shaping the professional landscape, proving that even the most unexpected connections merit meticulous consideration.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8664258 uncovered in our study echoes the findings of prior research by Smith et al. and Doe and Jones, shedding light on the complex relationship between environmental variables and professional demographics, much like a solar-powered lantern illuminating a path through a dimly lit maze. The statistical significance of our results, with a significance level of p < 0.01, is as clear and impactful as a perfectly timed punchline in a comedy club. Our findings resonate with the anecdotal evidence presented in "Breathless in Dayton," highlighting the tangible impact of air pollution on professional dynamics with a poignancy that surpasses any fictional tale.
Drawing from the whimsical narratives of "The Air Affair" and the metaphorical underpinnings of "Up in the Air," our exploration of the correlation between air pollution and purchasing managers unveils a reality as captivating as an unexpected plot twist in a bestselling novel. The scatterplot visually encapsulates this connection, reminiscent of a series of clues in a captivating mystery, urging further investigation into the compelling relationship between environmental conditions and professional landscapes.
In unveiling the clandestine connection between air pollution in Dayton and the population of purchasing managers in Ohio, our study serves as a reminder that even the most unexpected relationships merit meticulous consideration, akin to stumbling upon a rare artifact in an archaeological dig. This endeavor, while serious in its pursuit of empirical evidence, does not shy away from embracing the serendipitous and lighthearted aspects of the research process, infusing the pursuit of knowledge with the same sense of curiosity and humor found in a captivating comedic performance.
As we navigate the smoggy path to procurement, our findings beckon a deeper understanding of the intricate interplay between environmental factors and professional demographics, much like carefully unraveling the layers of a complex joke to reveal its underlying wit. This study paves the way for future inquiries into the multifaceted dynamics shaping the professional landscape, urging researchers and policymakers alike to approach the sway of environmental conditions on professional demographics with the same gravity as a well-executed punchline—a balance of levity and significance that forms the crux of our scholarly pursuit.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dayton and The number of purchasing managers in Ohio. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Smoggy Path to Procurement: Unveiling the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Population of Purchasing Managers in Ohio
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the often overlooked but intriguing relationship between air pollution and the number of purchasing managers, aiming to shed light on the potential impact of environmental factors on the professional landscape. Leveraging comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, our research team determined a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8664258 and a significance level of p < 0.01, revealing a striking connection between air quality in Dayton and the population of purchasing managers in the Buckeye State. While our findings evoke more queries than answers, this study serves as a breath of fresh air in the pursuit of understanding the intricate interplay between environmental concerns and professional demographics.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the legendary comedian George Carlin once quipped, "Do you ever notice that anyone driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac?" In a similar vein, we often overlook the impact of air pollution on the professional landscape, blissfully unaware of its potential influence on the population of purchasing managers. Our study sets out to unravel this smog-infused mystery and explore the intricate dance between particulate matter and procurement professionals.
It is a truth universally acknowledged that air pollution poses significant health and environmental hazards. However, what is lesser known is its potential impact on the composition of the labor force, particularly in the field of purchasing management. This research seeks to navigate the labyrinth of pollution data and employment figures, aiming to elucidate the captivating correlation between atmospheric contamination and the number of individuals navigating the labyrinth of procurement processes in Ohio.
Much like discovering a particularly pungent cheese at a neighborhood picnic, our findings elicit a mix of surprise and intrigue. In our detailed analysis spanning nearly two decades, an undeniable connection emerged, akin to the scent of a freshly baked bread wafting through a bustling market square. The correlation coefficient of 0.8664258, coupled with a significance level of p < 0.01, serves as a beacon in the fog of uncertainty, illuminating the connection between Dayton's air quality and the population of purchasing managers in the Buckeye State.
This study is not merely an exercise in statistical acrobatics, but a journey of discovery and revelation. By embracing the complexity of environmental and professional dynamics, we aspire to paint a vivid portrait of the unseen forces shaping the labor landscape, much like an artist capturing the elusive essence of a fleeting sunset. Our inquiry serves as a testament to the enduring interplay between seemingly disparate realms, proving that the "smoggy path to procurement" is a tale worth unraveling.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of the data analysis yielded a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8664258, highlighting a strong positive relationship between air pollution in Dayton and the number of purchasing managers in Ohio. The r-squared value of 0.7506937 indicated that approximately 75.07% of the variability in the population of purchasing managers could be explained by the variations in air pollution levels over the period of 2003 to 2022. The significance level of p < 0.01 provided conclusive evidence of the statistical significance of this connection, debunking any notion of this correlation being a mere happenstance.
Upon visual inspection of the data, the tight relationship between air pollution and the population of purchasing managers is vividly demonstrated in Fig. 1. The scatterplot showcases a striking pattern, resembling the scattered breadcrumbs leading to a hidden treasure of insights. This correlation, akin to an unexpected gust of wind in the procurement landscape, encourages further exploration into the intricate web of factors influencing professional demographics.
The findings of this study, much like uncovering an unexpected gem in a pile of rubble, shed light on the often underestimated impact of environmental variables on the composition of the labor force. While the relationship between air pollution in Dayton and the number of purchasing managers in Ohio may seem as surprising as finding a rare coin beneath the sofa cushions, the data unequivocally affirms this connection. This revelation serves as a beacon in the mist, urging researchers and policymakers to consider the potential influence of environmental conditions on professional demographics with the same gravity as an unexpected twist in a riveting novel.
In summary, our investigation unravels a captivating correlation between air quality in Dayton and the population of purchasing managers in Ohio, underscoring the need for a deeper understanding of the intricate interplay between environmental factors and professional demographics. This study, not unlike stumbling upon a hidden chamber in a labyrinth, paves the way for further exploration of the multifaceted dynamics shaping the professional landscape, proving that even the most unexpected connections merit meticulous consideration.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our findings illuminate the intriguing connection between air pollution in Dayton and the population of purchasing managers in Ohio, akin to discovering a hidden gem in a thrift store. The robust correlation coefficient and significance level of our results, much like a perfectly executed punchline, underscore the substantial impact of atmospheric contamination on professional demographics. These findings not only navigate the foggy realms of procurement and pollution but also beckon further exploration into the whimsical dance of environmental and professional dynamics.
While this study unravels the symbiotic relationship between air quality and the composition of the labor force, much like unraveling a convoluted joke, it also underscores the need for greater attention to the influence of environmental variables on professional demographics. The correlation unveiled in our research, reminiscent of a surprising plot twist in a comedy show, urges policymakers and researchers to recognize the significance of air pollution in shaping the landscape of procurement professionals.
In the spirit of comedian Mitch Hedberg's offbeat humor, who once said, "I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it," we assert that no further research is needed in this area, as our study serves as a lighthearted yet substantial contribution to the understanding of the interplay between environmental factors and professional demographics. Thus, we encourage future studies to explore other equally amusing and impactful phenomena in the ever-entertaining tapestry of academic inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Smoggy Path to Procurement: Unveiling the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Population of Purchasing Managers in Ohio. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Environmental Economics and Procurement Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Smoggy Path to Procurement: Unveiling the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Population of Purchasing Managers in Ohio. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Ecological Economics and Urban Development
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Smoggy Path to Procurement: Unveiling the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Population of Purchasing Managers in Ohio with an abstract of This study delves into the often overlooked but intriguing relationship between air pollution and the number of purchasing managers, aiming to shed light on the potential impact of environmental factors on the professional landscape. Leveraging comprehensive data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, our research team determined a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8664258 and a significance level of p < 0.01, revealing a striking connection between air quality in Dayton and the population of purchasing managers in the Buckeye State. While our findings evoke more queries than answers, this study serves as a breath of fresh air in the pursuit of understanding the intricate interplay between environmental concerns and professional demographics.
ChatGPT:
air pollution, purchasing managers, Dayton, Ohio, environmental impact, correlation study, environmental factors, professional demographics, air quality, population data, procurement, relationship analysis
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Air pollution in DaytonDetailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Dayton, OH
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Dayton
The number of purchasing managers in Ohio
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of purchasing managers in Ohio
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of purchasing managers in Ohio
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.7506937 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 75.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of purchasing managers in Ohio) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Dayton) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.8E-7. 0.0000007837565035085450000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 7.8E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,275,906 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.69, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
Air pollution in Dayton (Bad air quality days) | 2.19178 | 0 | 0.547945 | 0.273973 | 0.547945 | 0.273224 | 0 | 0 | 0.273973 | 0.273224 | 0.273973 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The number of purchasing managers in Ohio (Purchasing Managers) | 3900 | 2810 | 2770 | 2710 | 2580 | 2560 | 2210 | 2250 | 2430 | 2730 | 2690 | 2640 | 2620 | 2480 | 2580 | 2290 | 2230 | 2180 | 2080 | 2140 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2.19178,0,0.547945,0.273973,0.547945,0.273224,0,0,0.273973,0.273224,0.273973,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,])
array_2 = np.array([3900,2810,2770,2710,2580,2560,2210,2250,2430,2730,2690,2640,2620,2480,2580,2290,2230,2180,2080,2140,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Dayton"
array_2_name = "The number of purchasing managers in Ohio"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Air pollution in Dayton
- Line chart for only The number of purchasing managers in Ohio
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: The Smoggy Path to Procurement: Unveiling the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Population of Purchasing Managers in Ohio
Kudos for rating!
Correlation ID: 3691 · Black Variable ID: 20524 · Red Variable ID: 12732