Report an error
Air pollution in Dayton correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Master's degrees awarded in Library science | r=0.94 | 10yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in gender studies | r=0.91 | 10yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Education | r=0.9 | 10yrs | No |
The number of purchasing managers in Ohio | r=0.87 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Customer satisfaction with Frontier Communications | r=0.77 | 28yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Kathy | r=0.76 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Renae | r=0.74 | 43yrs | No |
Kerosene used in United States | r=0.73 | 43yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Dayton also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)