about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,669 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Columbus and the second variable is Kerosene used in Syria.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As air pollution in Columbus decreased, it led to a rise in eco-friendly initiatives. This caused a heightened interest in alternative energy sources globally. People in Syria, inspired by the green movement, switched to cleaner fuel options, including solar power and wind energy. This shift away from traditional kerosene use not only reduced air pollution in Syria, but also sparked a peaceful 'renewable energy' revolution in the region. This goes to show that when it comes to clean air and global impact, the winds of change can truly make a world of difference!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a serene park setting, where a flock of sleek, metallic pigeons gracefully roams the lush green grass. The clear blue sky above showcases futuristic geometric structures, juxtaposed against the faint hazy outline of air pollution. Meanwhile, in a humble Syrian village, a family sits gathered around a warm, glowing kerosene lamp in the evening, their simple surroundings illuminated in the comforting light. The subtle change in their nightly routine reflects global shifts in energy demand. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Columbus and Kerosene used in Syria. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image inspired by bauhaus Data cyber art Futuristic Brutalism
ChatGPT: Futuristic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Columbus and Kerosene used in Syria, in the following situation: Because fewer pigeons in Columbus reduced bird flatulence, leading to reduced methane emissions, which caused global kerosene demand to decrease, including in Syria.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a tranquil park in Columbus, Ohio, a group of pigeons roamed the lush green grass, while the clear blue sky overhead was marred by the faint haze of air pollution. Meanwhile, in a small village in Syria, a family gathered around a warm kerosene lamp in the evening, illuminating their simple surroundings. The reduced demand for kerosene due to global factors brought a subtle change to their nightly routine.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: In a tranquil park in Columbus, Ohio, a group of pigeons roamed the lush green grass, while the clear blue sky overhead was marred by the faint haze of air pollution. Meanwhile, in a small village in Syria, a family gathered around a warm kerosene lamp in the evening, illuminating their simple surroundings. The reduced demand for kerosene due to global factors brought a subtle change to their nightly routine. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a serene park setting, where a flock of sleek, metallic pigeons gracefully roams the lush green grass. The clear blue sky above showcases futuristic geometric structures, juxtaposed against the faint hazy outline of air pollution. Meanwhile, in a humble Syrian village, a family sits gathered around a warm, glowing kerosene lamp in the evening, their simple surroundings illuminated in the comforting light. The subtle change in their nightly routine reflects global shifts in energy demand.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Columbus caused Kerosene used in Syria to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Blowing Smoke: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Columbus and Kerosene Combustion in Syria

The International Journal of Environmental Emissions Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Columbus and Kerosene used in Syria. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7158783 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing Smoke: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Columbus and Kerosene Combustion in Syria"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our research delves into the curious correlation between the air pollutant levels in Columbus, Ohio, and the utilization of kerosene for household energy needs in Syria. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our analysis revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7158783 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1980 to 2021. The findings not only shed light on the environmental interconnectivity across continents but also underscore the importance of considering global factors in local air quality management. This study offers a breath of fresh air in the realm of environmental research, opening a window into the unexpected relationships that defy geographic borders and environmental frontiers.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Columbus and Kerosene used in Syria. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing Smoke: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Columbus and Kerosene Combustion in Syria"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our research delves into the curious correlation between the air pollutant levels in Columbus, Ohio, and the utilization of kerosene for household energy needs in Syria. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our analysis revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7158783 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1980 to 2021. The findings not only shed light on the environmental interconnectivity across continents but also underscore the importance of considering global factors in local air quality management. This study offers a breath of fresh air in the realm of environmental research, opening a window into the unexpected relationships that defy geographic borders and environmental frontiers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
The alarming rise in air pollution levels has left us all gasping for breath, figuratively and literally. From the bustling streets of Columbus, Ohio to the serene landscapes of Syria, the issue of air quality transcends borders, sparking our curiosity about the unlikely connections that may exist. As researchers, we find ourselves drawn to these unseen threads linking seemingly disparate locales and environmental dynamics, much like detectives unravelling a complex case of global atmospheric intrigue. It is in this spirit of investigation that we set out to explore the enigmatic relationship between the air pollution in Columbus and the combustion of kerosene in Syrian households.

The title of our study, "Blowing Smoke," is not just a play on words, but a poignant representation of the invisible forces at play—pollutant particles wafting through the air, indifferent to geopolitical boundaries that define nations. As we embark on this research journey, we invite our readers to accompany us through this unexpected and thought-provoking odyssey.

The abstract of our study hints at the statistical wizardry and methodological prowess that underpin our findings. The significant correlation coefficient and the p-value that would make any discerning statistician raise an eyebrow are more than mere numbers; they are the footprints left by the interwoven dance of air pollutants and kerosene combustion, a story waiting to be deciphered.

In this paper, we strive to bring levity to the weighty topic of air pollution and kerosene usage, using humor to lighten the atmosphere, much like a well-timed fan disperses clouds of smoke. The findings unveiled in our study may at times astound, elicit a chuckle, or prompt a raised eyebrow, but they ultimately serve to deepen our understanding of the intricate web of environmental interconnectedness that envelops our planet.

So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts and prepare to be transported to the crossroads where Columbus and Syria meet, where air pollution and kerosene combustion engage in a dance as old as time, and where the unexpected takes center stage. Let's embark on this intellectual escapade with a spirit of curiosity and an appreciation for the whimsical nature of scientific discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Columbus and Kerosene used in Syria. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing Smoke: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Columbus and Kerosene Combustion in Syria"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our research delves into the curious correlation between the air pollutant levels in Columbus, Ohio, and the utilization of kerosene for household energy needs in Syria. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our analysis revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7158783 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1980 to 2021. The findings not only shed light on the environmental interconnectivity across continents but also underscore the importance of considering global factors in local air quality management. This study offers a breath of fresh air in the realm of environmental research, opening a window into the unexpected relationships that defy geographic borders and environmental frontiers.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The alarming rise in air pollution levels has left us all gasping for breath, figuratively and literally. From the bustling streets of Columbus, Ohio to the serene landscapes of Syria, the issue of air quality transcends borders, sparking our curiosity about the unlikely connections that may exist. As researchers, we find ourselves drawn to these unseen threads linking seemingly disparate locales and environmental dynamics, much like detectives unravelling a complex case of global atmospheric intrigue. It is in this spirit of investigation that we set out to explore the enigmatic relationship between the air pollution in Columbus and the combustion of kerosene in Syrian households.
The title of our study, "Blowing Smoke," is not just a play on words, but a poignant representation of the invisible forces at play—pollutant particles wafting through the air, indifferent to geopolitical boundaries that define nations. As we embark on this research journey, we invite our readers to accompany us through this unexpected and thought-provoking odyssey.
The abstract of our study hints at the statistical wizardry and methodological prowess that underpin our findings. The significant correlation coefficient and the p-value that would make any discerning statistician raise an eyebrow are more than mere numbers; they are the footprints left by the interwoven dance of air pollutants and kerosene combustion, a story waiting to be deciphered.
In this paper, we strive to bring levity to the weighty topic of air pollution and kerosene usage, using humor to lighten the atmosphere, much like a well-timed fan disperses clouds of smoke. The findings unveiled in our study may at times astound, elicit a chuckle, or prompt a raised eyebrow, but they ultimately serve to deepen our understanding of the intricate web of environmental interconnectedness that envelops our planet.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts and prepare to be transported to the crossroads where Columbus and Syria meet, where air pollution and kerosene combustion engage in a dance as old as time, and where the unexpected takes center stage. Let's embark on this intellectual escapade with a spirit of curiosity and an appreciation for the whimsical nature of scientific discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature on air pollution and its far-reaching implications spans a wide array of authoritative sources and in-depth studies. Smith and Doe (2017) emphasize the detrimental effects of air pollution on public health, highlighting the need for increased scrutiny and intervention measures. Jones et al. (2019) delve into the complexities of household energy use in developing regions, drawing attention to the pervasive reliance on traditional fuels such as kerosene. These seminal works lay the groundwork for our investigation into the intriguing correlation between air pollution in Columbus and kerosene combustion in Syria.

Turning to non-fiction literature that has shaped our understanding of environmental dynamics, "The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History" by Elizabeth Kolbert provides a sobering account of humanity's impact on the planet's ecological balance. In a somewhat lighter vein, "The Lorax" by Dr. Seuss is a timeless tale that poignantly illustrates the consequences of environmental degradation. As we venture into the realm of fiction, the dystopian themes of "The Road" by Cormac McCarthy and the post-apocalyptic setting of "Station Eleven" by Emily St. John Mandel offer thought-provoking parallels to the interconnectedness of environmental issues worldwide.

In a departure from conventional research methods, it is worth noting that the authors have gleaned insights from unlikely sources, including but not limited to grocery store receipts, fortune cookies, and the occasional overheard conversation at a local café. While these unconventional avenues may raise eyebrows in scholarly circles, the findings presented in this paper are a testament to the unbounded curiosity that fuels the pursuit of knowledge.

As we navigate the terrain of environmental research, we are reminded that a touch of whimsy and a dash of levity can illuminate the most serious of topics. With this literary voyage as our guide, we invite readers to join us in this intellectual expedition, where the unexpected unfolds like a whimsical plot twist in a grand narrative of scientific inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Columbus and Kerosene used in Syria. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing Smoke: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Columbus and Kerosene Combustion in Syria"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our research delves into the curious correlation between the air pollutant levels in Columbus, Ohio, and the utilization of kerosene for household energy needs in Syria. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our analysis revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7158783 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1980 to 2021. The findings not only shed light on the environmental interconnectivity across continents but also underscore the importance of considering global factors in local air quality management. This study offers a breath of fresh air in the realm of environmental research, opening a window into the unexpected relationships that defy geographic borders and environmental frontiers.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The alarming rise in air pollution levels has left us all gasping for breath, figuratively and literally. From the bustling streets of Columbus, Ohio to the serene landscapes of Syria, the issue of air quality transcends borders, sparking our curiosity about the unlikely connections that may exist. As researchers, we find ourselves drawn to these unseen threads linking seemingly disparate locales and environmental dynamics, much like detectives unravelling a complex case of global atmospheric intrigue. It is in this spirit of investigation that we set out to explore the enigmatic relationship between the air pollution in Columbus and the combustion of kerosene in Syrian households.
The title of our study, "Blowing Smoke," is not just a play on words, but a poignant representation of the invisible forces at play—pollutant particles wafting through the air, indifferent to geopolitical boundaries that define nations. As we embark on this research journey, we invite our readers to accompany us through this unexpected and thought-provoking odyssey.
The abstract of our study hints at the statistical wizardry and methodological prowess that underpin our findings. The significant correlation coefficient and the p-value that would make any discerning statistician raise an eyebrow are more than mere numbers; they are the footprints left by the interwoven dance of air pollutants and kerosene combustion, a story waiting to be deciphered.
In this paper, we strive to bring levity to the weighty topic of air pollution and kerosene usage, using humor to lighten the atmosphere, much like a well-timed fan disperses clouds of smoke. The findings unveiled in our study may at times astound, elicit a chuckle, or prompt a raised eyebrow, but they ultimately serve to deepen our understanding of the intricate web of environmental interconnectedness that envelops our planet.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts and prepare to be transported to the crossroads where Columbus and Syria meet, where air pollution and kerosene combustion engage in a dance as old as time, and where the unexpected takes center stage. Let's embark on this intellectual escapade with a spirit of curiosity and an appreciation for the whimsical nature of scientific discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the mystifying connection between air pollution in Columbus and kerosene combustion in Syria, our research team embarked on a journey of data collection and analysis that could rival the epic tales of ancient explorers. Our first port of call was the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA), where we cast our nets far and wide, scooping up data spanning the years 1980 to 2021. We sifted through a sea of statistics, braving the occasional waves of uncertainty and skepticism, to extract the pearls of wisdom that lay hidden amidst the digital expanse.

Our methodology can be likened to a culinary experiment, where precise measurements and meticulous observations are key. We deftly combined the ingredients of air pollutant levels in Columbus, obtained from the EPA Air Quality System database, with the consumption of kerosene for household energy needs in Syria, sourced from the EIA International Energy Statistics. Like intrepid chefs, we stirred the pot of data with the utmost care, ensuring that the flavors of correlation and causation melded harmoniously.

Every chef knows that a dash of seasoning can make all the difference, and in a similar vein, we employed sophisticated statistical analyses to uncover the tantalizing flavor of correlation. The Pearson correlation coefficient emerged as our trusty measuring cup, enabling us to gauge the strength and direction of the relationship between air pollutant levels in Columbus and kerosene consumption in Syria. As we curated this statistical feast, we upheld the principles of transparency and reproducibility, ensuring that our concoction could withstand the scrutiny of the most discerning palate.

In the spirit of embracing modern technological marvels, we harnessed the power of computational tools, employing software such as R and Python to orchestrate our statistical symphony. Our data underwent a rigorous quality assurance process, akin to a seasoned sommelier discerning the nuances of a fine wine, to ensure its integrity and reliability.

The complexity of our methodology might rival that of an intricate dance, where each step is calculated and deliberate, yet imbued with an air of grace and fluidity. With a blend of digital dexterity and methodological finesse, we successfully navigated the labyrinthine corridors of data analysis, emerging victorious with a trove of statistically significant findings at our fingertips.

And so, dear reader, we invite you to savor the rich tapestry of our methodology, woven with meticulous precision and seasoned with a playful touch, as we set the stage for the unveiling of our compelling findings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Columbus and Kerosene used in Syria. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7158783, r-squared of 0.5124817, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing Smoke: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Columbus and Kerosene Combustion in Syria"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our research delves into the curious correlation between the air pollutant levels in Columbus, Ohio, and the utilization of kerosene for household energy needs in Syria. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our analysis revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7158783 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1980 to 2021. The findings not only shed light on the environmental interconnectivity across continents but also underscore the importance of considering global factors in local air quality management. This study offers a breath of fresh air in the realm of environmental research, opening a window into the unexpected relationships that defy geographic borders and environmental frontiers.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The alarming rise in air pollution levels has left us all gasping for breath, figuratively and literally. From the bustling streets of Columbus, Ohio to the serene landscapes of Syria, the issue of air quality transcends borders, sparking our curiosity about the unlikely connections that may exist. As researchers, we find ourselves drawn to these unseen threads linking seemingly disparate locales and environmental dynamics, much like detectives unravelling a complex case of global atmospheric intrigue. It is in this spirit of investigation that we set out to explore the enigmatic relationship between the air pollution in Columbus and the combustion of kerosene in Syrian households.
The title of our study, "Blowing Smoke," is not just a play on words, but a poignant representation of the invisible forces at play—pollutant particles wafting through the air, indifferent to geopolitical boundaries that define nations. As we embark on this research journey, we invite our readers to accompany us through this unexpected and thought-provoking odyssey.
The abstract of our study hints at the statistical wizardry and methodological prowess that underpin our findings. The significant correlation coefficient and the p-value that would make any discerning statistician raise an eyebrow are more than mere numbers; they are the footprints left by the interwoven dance of air pollutants and kerosene combustion, a story waiting to be deciphered.
In this paper, we strive to bring levity to the weighty topic of air pollution and kerosene usage, using humor to lighten the atmosphere, much like a well-timed fan disperses clouds of smoke. The findings unveiled in our study may at times astound, elicit a chuckle, or prompt a raised eyebrow, but they ultimately serve to deepen our understanding of the intricate web of environmental interconnectedness that envelops our planet.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts and prepare to be transported to the crossroads where Columbus and Syria meet, where air pollution and kerosene combustion engage in a dance as old as time, and where the unexpected takes center stage. Let's embark on this intellectual escapade with a spirit of curiosity and an appreciation for the whimsical nature of scientific discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the intersection of air pollution in Columbus, Ohio, and kerosene combustion in Syrian households have unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.7158783, an r-squared value of 0.5124817, and a p-value of less than 0.01. These statistical indicators point to a strong and meaningful relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables over the 41-year period from 1980 to 2021.

The data, much like a game of environmental connect-the-dots, reveals a compelling pattern that cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence. Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the robust correlation between air pollution in Columbus and kerosene usage in Syria, a connection that traverses continents and defies conventional expectations.

This significant linkage not only elicits a nod of approval from even the most discerning statistician but also prompts a wry smile at the unexpected nature of environmental interconnectivity. It beckons us to ponder the curious ways in which global dynamics and local practices intertwine, transcending geographic boundaries and atmospheric frontiers.

The implications of these findings are as stark as the Columbus skyline on a smoggy day. They underscore the imperative of considering global factors in managing local air quality, emphasizing the ripple effects of energy practices across the globe. Our results offer a breath of fresh air in the examination of cross-continental environmental correlations, illuminating the complex dance of pollutants and combustion that plays out on a global stage.

In this era of environmental consciousness, our study takes a lighthearted approach to a weighty topic, infusing humor into the scientific discourse much like a well-placed air purifier. While the linkage between air pollution in Columbus and kerosene usage in Syria may appear surprising at first glance, it reminds us that the hidden connections in our world are often waiting to be uncovered, much like an unexpected punchline in a serious conversation.

These results beckon us to look beyond the smokescreen of individual locales and into the broader tapestry of environmental interconnectedness, an endeavor that both informs and entertains. The correlation revealed between air pollution in Columbus and kerosene combustion in Syria serves as a reminder that the scientific world is replete with unexpected relationships, providing both moments of revelation and chuckles along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Columbus and Kerosene used in Syria. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Blowing Smoke: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Columbus and Kerosene Combustion in Syria"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our research delves into the curious correlation between the air pollutant levels in Columbus, Ohio, and the utilization of kerosene for household energy needs in Syria. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our analysis revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7158783 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1980 to 2021. The findings not only shed light on the environmental interconnectivity across continents but also underscore the importance of considering global factors in local air quality management. This study offers a breath of fresh air in the realm of environmental research, opening a window into the unexpected relationships that defy geographic borders and environmental frontiers.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature on air pollution and its far-reaching implications spans a wide array of authoritative sources and in-depth studies. Smith and Doe (2017) emphasize the detrimental effects of air pollution on public health, highlighting the need for increased scrutiny and intervention measures. Jones et al. (2019) delve into the complexities of household energy use in developing regions, drawing attention to the pervasive reliance on traditional fuels such as kerosene. These seminal works lay the groundwork for our investigation into the intriguing correlation between air pollution in Columbus and kerosene combustion in Syria.
Turning to non-fiction literature that has shaped our understanding of environmental dynamics, "The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History" by Elizabeth Kolbert provides a sobering account of humanity's impact on the planet's ecological balance. In a somewhat lighter vein, "The Lorax" by Dr. Seuss is a timeless tale that poignantly illustrates the consequences of environmental degradation. As we venture into the realm of fiction, the dystopian themes of "The Road" by Cormac McCarthy and the post-apocalyptic setting of "Station Eleven" by Emily St. John Mandel offer thought-provoking parallels to the interconnectedness of environmental issues worldwide.
In a departure from conventional research methods, it is worth noting that the authors have gleaned insights from unlikely sources, including but not limited to grocery store receipts, fortune cookies, and the occasional overheard conversation at a local café. While these unconventional avenues may raise eyebrows in scholarly circles, the findings presented in this paper are a testament to the unbounded curiosity that fuels the pursuit of knowledge.
As we navigate the terrain of environmental research, we are reminded that a touch of whimsy and a dash of levity can illuminate the most serious of topics. With this literary voyage as our guide, we invite readers to join us in this intellectual expedition, where the unexpected unfolds like a whimsical plot twist in a grand narrative of scientific inquiry.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the intersection of air pollution in Columbus, Ohio, and kerosene combustion in Syrian households have unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.7158783, an r-squared value of 0.5124817, and a p-value of less than 0.01. These statistical indicators point to a strong and meaningful relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables over the 41-year period from 1980 to 2021.
The data, much like a game of environmental connect-the-dots, reveals a compelling pattern that cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence. Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the robust correlation between air pollution in Columbus and kerosene usage in Syria, a connection that traverses continents and defies conventional expectations.
This significant linkage not only elicits a nod of approval from even the most discerning statistician but also prompts a wry smile at the unexpected nature of environmental interconnectivity. It beckons us to ponder the curious ways in which global dynamics and local practices intertwine, transcending geographic boundaries and atmospheric frontiers.
The implications of these findings are as stark as the Columbus skyline on a smoggy day. They underscore the imperative of considering global factors in managing local air quality, emphasizing the ripple effects of energy practices across the globe. Our results offer a breath of fresh air in the examination of cross-continental environmental correlations, illuminating the complex dance of pollutants and combustion that plays out on a global stage.
In this era of environmental consciousness, our study takes a lighthearted approach to a weighty topic, infusing humor into the scientific discourse much like a well-placed air purifier. While the linkage between air pollution in Columbus and kerosene usage in Syria may appear surprising at first glance, it reminds us that the hidden connections in our world are often waiting to be uncovered, much like an unexpected punchline in a serious conversation.
These results beckon us to look beyond the smokescreen of individual locales and into the broader tapestry of environmental interconnectedness, an endeavor that both informs and entertains. The correlation revealed between air pollution in Columbus and kerosene combustion in Syria serves as a reminder that the scientific world is replete with unexpected relationships, providing both moments of revelation and chuckles along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study present a compelling case for the interconnectedness of air pollution in Columbus and the use of kerosene in Syrian households. The substantial correlation coefficient uncovered in our analysis reinforces the notion that environmental phenomena can transcend borders and manifest in unexpected ways.

Taking a lighthearted turn reminiscent of "The Lorax" by Dr. Seuss, our findings underscore the importance of recognizing the intricate web of environmental interdependence, where a seemingly unrelated act on one side of the globe can yield tangible consequences elsewhere. The statistical relationship between air pollution in Columbus and kerosene combustion in Syria, much like the unexpected turn in a well-crafted plot twist, requires us to re-evaluate our understanding of local and global environmental dynamics.

Our results build upon the foundations laid out by Smith and Doe (2017) and Jones et al. (2019), who emphasized the far-reaching implications of air pollution on public health and the prevalent use of traditional fuels such as kerosene in household energy consumption. In a nod to the unexpected sources of inspiration highlighted in our literature review, including grocery store receipts and fortune cookies, our study showcases the value of embracing unconventional wisdom and exploring uncharted avenues.

The correlation coefficient of 0.7158783 and the associated p-value of less than 0.01 not only validate our initial hypothesis but also serve as a testament to the nuanced dance of environmental factors on a global scale. The linkage between air pollution in Columbus and kerosene usage in Syria highlights the need for heightened awareness of the ripple effects of energy practices across geographical boundaries.

Our findings, much like a well-timed punchline, infuse humor into the refined discourse of scientific inquiry, reminding us that the pursuit of knowledge can be both enlightening and amusing. As we navigate the terrain of environmental research, our study serves as an entertaining yet academically rigorous foray into the unexpected relationships that underpin the ecological balance of our planet.

In this spirit, our examination of the correlation between air pollution in Columbus and kerosene combustion in Syrian households offers a breath of fresh air, inviting scholars and readers to engage with the whimsical nature of scientific discovery. As we endeavor to unravel the convoluted threads of environmental interconnectivity, these results encourage a blend of astute observation and a dash of jocularity, bridging the gap between analytical rigor and the unexpected revelations that enrich scholarly pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Columbus and Kerosene used in Syria. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing Smoke: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Columbus and Kerosene Combustion in Syria"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our research delves into the curious correlation between the air pollutant levels in Columbus, Ohio, and the utilization of kerosene for household energy needs in Syria. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our analysis revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7158783 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1980 to 2021. The findings not only shed light on the environmental interconnectivity across continents but also underscore the importance of considering global factors in local air quality management. This study offers a breath of fresh air in the realm of environmental research, opening a window into the unexpected relationships that defy geographic borders and environmental frontiers.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The alarming rise in air pollution levels has left us all gasping for breath, figuratively and literally. From the bustling streets of Columbus, Ohio to the serene landscapes of Syria, the issue of air quality transcends borders, sparking our curiosity about the unlikely connections that may exist. As researchers, we find ourselves drawn to these unseen threads linking seemingly disparate locales and environmental dynamics, much like detectives unravelling a complex case of global atmospheric intrigue. It is in this spirit of investigation that we set out to explore the enigmatic relationship between the air pollution in Columbus and the combustion of kerosene in Syrian households.
The title of our study, "Blowing Smoke," is not just a play on words, but a poignant representation of the invisible forces at play—pollutant particles wafting through the air, indifferent to geopolitical boundaries that define nations. As we embark on this research journey, we invite our readers to accompany us through this unexpected and thought-provoking odyssey.
The abstract of our study hints at the statistical wizardry and methodological prowess that underpin our findings. The significant correlation coefficient and the p-value that would make any discerning statistician raise an eyebrow are more than mere numbers; they are the footprints left by the interwoven dance of air pollutants and kerosene combustion, a story waiting to be deciphered.
In this paper, we strive to bring levity to the weighty topic of air pollution and kerosene usage, using humor to lighten the atmosphere, much like a well-timed fan disperses clouds of smoke. The findings unveiled in our study may at times astound, elicit a chuckle, or prompt a raised eyebrow, but they ultimately serve to deepen our understanding of the intricate web of environmental interconnectedness that envelops our planet.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts and prepare to be transported to the crossroads where Columbus and Syria meet, where air pollution and kerosene combustion engage in a dance as old as time, and where the unexpected takes center stage. Let's embark on this intellectual escapade with a spirit of curiosity and an appreciation for the whimsical nature of scientific discovery.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the intersection of air pollution in Columbus, Ohio, and kerosene combustion in Syrian households have unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.7158783, an r-squared value of 0.5124817, and a p-value of less than 0.01. These statistical indicators point to a strong and meaningful relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables over the 41-year period from 1980 to 2021.
The data, much like a game of environmental connect-the-dots, reveals a compelling pattern that cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence. Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the robust correlation between air pollution in Columbus and kerosene usage in Syria, a connection that traverses continents and defies conventional expectations.
This significant linkage not only elicits a nod of approval from even the most discerning statistician but also prompts a wry smile at the unexpected nature of environmental interconnectivity. It beckons us to ponder the curious ways in which global dynamics and local practices intertwine, transcending geographic boundaries and atmospheric frontiers.
The implications of these findings are as stark as the Columbus skyline on a smoggy day. They underscore the imperative of considering global factors in managing local air quality, emphasizing the ripple effects of energy practices across the globe. Our results offer a breath of fresh air in the examination of cross-continental environmental correlations, illuminating the complex dance of pollutants and combustion that plays out on a global stage.
In this era of environmental consciousness, our study takes a lighthearted approach to a weighty topic, infusing humor into the scientific discourse much like a well-placed air purifier. While the linkage between air pollution in Columbus and kerosene usage in Syria may appear surprising at first glance, it reminds us that the hidden connections in our world are often waiting to be uncovered, much like an unexpected punchline in a serious conversation.
These results beckon us to look beyond the smokescreen of individual locales and into the broader tapestry of environmental interconnectedness, an endeavor that both informs and entertains. The correlation revealed between air pollution in Columbus and kerosene combustion in Syria serves as a reminder that the scientific world is replete with unexpected relationships, providing both moments of revelation and chuckles along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has illuminated a remarkable link between air pollution in Columbus, Ohio, and kerosene combustion in Syrian households. The statistical correlation coefficient of 0.7158783 reflects a robust relationship that transcends continents, resembling an unlikely but endearing long-distance romance. The findings not only add a breath of fresh air to the field of environmental research but also highlight the intricate interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena, much like discovering that your favorite comedian is secretly a fan of obscure medieval history.

The implication that local air quality can be influenced by practices thousands of miles away may initially seem as surprising as finding a clown nose in a chemistry lab, yet it underscores the global impact of seemingly isolated actions, much like how a single domino can set off a chain reaction that reaches unexpected places. These results urge us to embrace a broader perspective on environmental management, recognizing that the world, much like a comedy routine, is filled with unexpected twists and connections waiting to be unveiled.

As we close this chapter on the curious relationship between air pollution in Columbus and kerosene usage in Syria, we do so with a sense of lightheartedness and gratitude for the insights gained, akin to the relief of a well-timed punchline in a serious conversation. In this vein, we assert with conviction that no further research is needed in this area, leaving the scientific community with a parting humorous quip: we may have, quite literally, cleared the air on this matter.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Blowing Smoke: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Columbus and Kerosene Combustion in Syria. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Environmental Emissions Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Blowing Smoke: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Columbus and Kerosene Combustion in Syria. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Global Air Quality and Environmental Health


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Blowing Smoke: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Columbus and Kerosene Combustion in Syria with an abstract of Our research delves into the curious correlation between the air pollutant levels in Columbus, Ohio, and the utilization of kerosene for household energy needs in Syria. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our analysis revealed a significant correlation coefficient of 0.7158783 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1980 to 2021. The findings not only shed light on the environmental interconnectivity across continents but also underscore the importance of considering global factors in local air quality management. This study offers a breath of fresh air in the realm of environmental research, opening a window into the unexpected relationships that defy geographic borders and environmental frontiers.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, Columbus Ohio, kerosene combustion, Syria, correlation, environmental interconnectivity, EPA data, EIA data, local air quality management, global factors, environmental research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Columbus
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Columbus, OH
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Columbus

Kerosene used in Syria
Detailed data title: Volume of kerosene used consumed in Syria in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Kerosene used in Syria

Correlation r = 0.7158783 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5124817 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 51.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Kerosene used in Syria) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Columbus) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.9E-8. 0.0000000985867004704237700000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.72 in 9.9E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 10,143,356 random variables You don't actually need 10 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.53, 0.84 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air pollution in Columbus (Bad air quality days)4.918032.191784.109594.931511.639341.369861.643842.465756.010931.917812.191786.301372.185791.643843.01374.109594.918033.287675.479456.301371.366122.739737.671232.191780.2732241.917810.5479451.923080.27322400.2739731.095890.819672000000000
Kerosene used in Syria (Million Barrels/Day)3.005463.278693.306013.797814.207654.480874.54.35.64.94.55.54.84.95.23.43.15.25.76.34.414134.087374.087373.388493.400363.748521.567180.444740.3168030.06353420.04235620.06353420.06336070.04235620.04235620.04235620.0356940.06517810.06517810.06517810.06517810.0651781




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.91803,2.19178,4.10959,4.93151,1.63934,1.36986,1.64384,2.46575,6.01093,1.91781,2.19178,6.30137,2.18579,1.64384,3.0137,4.10959,4.91803,3.28767,5.47945,6.30137,1.36612,2.73973,7.67123,2.19178,0.273224,1.91781,0.547945,1.92308,0.273224,0,0.273973,1.09589,0.819672,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,])
array_2 = np.array([3.00546,3.27869,3.30601,3.79781,4.20765,4.48087,4.5,4.3,5.6,4.9,4.5,5.5,4.8,4.9,5.2,3.4,3.1,5.2,5.7,6.3,4.41413,4.08737,4.08737,3.38849,3.40036,3.74852,1.56718,0.44474,0.316803,0.0635342,0.0423562,0.0635342,0.0633607,0.0423562,0.0423562,0.0423562,0.035694,0.0651781,0.0651781,0.0651781,0.0651781,0.0651781,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Columbus"
array_2_name = "Kerosene used in Syria"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 3669 · Black Variable ID: 20494 · Red Variable ID: 24965
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0