Report an error
Kerosene used in Syria correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the 'leeroy jenkins' meme | r=0.95 | 16yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jared | r=0.94 | 42yrs | No |
The wind speed in Los Angeles | r=0.93 | 21yrs | No |
Air pollution in Kingston, New York | r=0.85 | 22yrs | Yes! |
Divorce rates in the United Kingdom | r=0.84 | 33yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme | r=0.83 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'how to build a lightsaber' | r=0.8 | 18yrs | No |
Air pollution in Columbus | r=0.72 | 42yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Janesville, Wisconsin | r=0.71 | 41yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Springfield, Ohio | r=0.66 | 42yrs | Yes! |
Kerosene used in Syria also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)