about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,572 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Master's degrees awarded in Business and the second variable is Season wins for the Carolina Panthers.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more people obtained Master's degrees in Business, there was a subsequent rise in the number of consultants entering the workforce. These consultants, armed with their 'MBA = Must Blame Anybody' mentality, couldn't resist the opportunity to offer the Carolina Panthers unsolicited advice on everything from game strategies to team management. This led to confusion and discord within the team, as the players struggled to understand why someone with a PowerPoint presentation on profit margins was now critiquing their touchdown celebrations. In the end, the Panthers just couldn't handle the constant interference and overbearing analyses, and sadly, it all added up to a decrease in their season wins. It seems in this case, too many business degrees really did lead to a 'Panther-nity' of problems!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Masterful Business Presentation ] Generate an image of a group of dignified business professionals, all in well-tailored suits, standing confidently while proudly displaying their Master's degrees in Business. They are seen presenting charts and graphs to a perplexed Carolina Panthers coaching staff. In the background, the Panthers are depicted in the midst of losing a game, with their distracted coaches surrounded by stacks of feline-themed business consultant applications. The scene should exude a sense of professionalism and bemusement, with a clear visual focus on the juxtaposition of the business experts and the flustered coaches. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Master's degrees awarded in Business and Season wins for the Carolina Panthers. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: 3D Pixar Style Scalar art An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' a funny image you would see on reddit Parallax art
ChatGPT: Scalar art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Master's degrees awarded in Business and Season wins for the Carolina Panthers, in the following situation: Because as more people earned Master's degrees in Business, they became experts in the art of "panther management," leading to a surge in job applications from overly qualified feline-focused business consultants. This distracted the Panthers' coaching staff, who were inundated with purr-formance improvement proposals and PowerPoint presentations on team efficiency, causing a decrease in focus on actual game strategy.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A group of business professionals, all proudly displaying their Master's degrees in Business, are seen presenting charts and graphs to a bewildered Carolina Panthers coaching staff. In the background, the Panthers are seen losing a game, with their distracted coaches surrounded by piles of feline-themed business consultant applications.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Scalar art ] and depicting this scene: A group of business professionals, all proudly displaying their Master's degrees in Business, are seen presenting charts and graphs to a bewildered Carolina Panthers coaching staff. In the background, the Panthers are seen losing a game, with their distracted coaches surrounded by piles of feline-themed business consultant applications. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Masterful Business Presentation ] Generate an image of a group of dignified business professionals, all in well-tailored suits, standing confidently while proudly displaying their Master's degrees in Business. They are seen presenting charts and graphs to a perplexed Carolina Panthers coaching staff. In the background, the Panthers are depicted in the midst of losing a game, with their distracted coaches surrounded by stacks of feline-themed business consultant applications. The scene should exude a sense of professionalism and bemusement, with a clear visual focus on the juxtaposition of the business experts and the flustered coaches.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Master's degrees awarded in Business caused Season wins for the Carolina Panthers to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Mastering the Game: Unraveling the Link Between Business Master's Degrees and Carolina Panthers' Season Wins

The Journal of Sports Management and Business Analytics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Business and Season wins for the Carolina Panthers. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of -0.7211661 and p < 0.05 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Mastering the Game: Unraveling the Link Between Business Master's Degrees and Carolina Panthers' Season Wins

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in business and the seasonal performance of the Carolina Panthers in the NFL. We draw data from the National Center for Education Statistics to track the annual count of business Master's degrees conferred, and complement this with season win records for the Carolina Panthers sourced from Pro-Football-Reference.com. Our analysis uncovers a rather surprising correlation coefficient of -0.7211661, significant at p < 0.05, for the years 2012 to 2021.

The findings suggest that as the number of business Master's degrees awarded increases, the Carolina Panthers' seasonal wins tend to decrease. This peculiar negative relationship prompts further investigation into the potential underlying mechanisms. Could it be that fervent business students inadvertently distract the Panthers with their enthusiasm for ROI (Return on Interception)? Or perhaps the rise in Master's degrees in business leads to heightened financial acumen but diminished "quarterbacking" abilities on the field? These questions warrant deeper exploration.

Our study sheds light on a unique intersection of academia and sports and encourages a lighthearted consideration of the peculiar dynamics at play. As we continue to unpick this unexpected correlation, one cannot help but wonder if Carolina Panthers fans should start chanting "MBA, MBA, MBA!" for victory, or if perhaps an excess of finance knowledge truly has the potential to fumble the team's fortunes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Business and Season wins for the Carolina Panthers. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mastering the Game: Unraveling the Link Between Business Master's Degrees and Carolina Panthers' Season Wins

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in business and the seasonal performance of the Carolina Panthers in the NFL. We draw data from the National Center for Education Statistics to track the annual count of business Master's degrees conferred, and complement this with season win records for the Carolina Panthers sourced from Pro-Football-Reference.com. Our analysis uncovers a rather surprising correlation coefficient of -0.7211661, significant at p < 0.05, for the years 2012 to 2021.

The findings suggest that as the number of business Master's degrees awarded increases, the Carolina Panthers' seasonal wins tend to decrease. This peculiar negative relationship prompts further investigation into the potential underlying mechanisms. Could it be that fervent business students inadvertently distract the Panthers with their enthusiasm for ROI (Return on Interception)? Or perhaps the rise in Master's degrees in business leads to heightened financial acumen but diminished "quarterbacking" abilities on the field? These questions warrant deeper exploration.

Our study sheds light on a unique intersection of academia and sports and encourages a lighthearted consideration of the peculiar dynamics at play. As we continue to unpick this unexpected correlation, one cannot help but wonder if Carolina Panthers fans should start chanting "MBA, MBA, MBA!" for victory, or if perhaps an excess of finance knowledge truly has the potential to fumble the team's fortunes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

When it comes to the world of sports, unexpected correlations and surprising connections are always at play. Just like a good play-action pass, we can sometimes find ourselves blindsided by the peculiar relationships between seemingly unrelated phenomena. In this study, we embark on a journey to unravel the curious link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in business and the performance of the Carolina Panthers in the NFL. It's like trying to decode a perfectly executed flea-flicker play - full of twists and turns!

Amidst the excitement of touchdowns and field goals, we couldn't help but notice the eyebrow-raising negative relationship between the annual count of business Master's degrees conferred and the seasonal win records of the Carolina Panthers. It's almost as surprising as a perfectly timed onside kick! As we delved into the data, we were reminded of a classic dad joke: Why don't mathematicians ever play football? Because they always try to divide the field and strive for the perfect symmetry!

Drawing from the National Center for Education Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com, we meticulously examined the numbers and uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of -0.7211661, significant at p < 0.05, for the years 2012 to 2021. It's as if the spirit of statistical significance decided to don a Panthers jersey and join the mix!

The enigmatic negative relationship prompts a cascade of questions that are as perplexing as a Hail Mary pass - do the lofty ambitions of aspiring business leaders somehow detract from the Panthers' prowess on the field? Or does the influx of business acumen lead to a strategic miscalculation when it's fourth down and inches? These inquiries beckon us to enter the realm of humor and bemusement, akin to a perfectly executed end-zone celebration dance.

As we embark on this academic journey, we find ourselves navigating the riveting terrain where business education and gridiron battles meet. We strive to bring forth insights that not only shed light on this surprising relationship but also sprinkle a hint of mirth and whimsy into the world of statistical analysis. Just like a well-timed joke during a tense game, our findings promise to add an element of surprise and delight to the academic playing field.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Business and Season wins for the Carolina Panthers. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mastering the Game: Unraveling the Link Between Business Master's Degrees and Carolina Panthers' Season Wins

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in business and the seasonal performance of the Carolina Panthers in the NFL. We draw data from the National Center for Education Statistics to track the annual count of business Master's degrees conferred, and complement this with season win records for the Carolina Panthers sourced from Pro-Football-Reference.com. Our analysis uncovers a rather surprising correlation coefficient of -0.7211661, significant at p < 0.05, for the years 2012 to 2021.

The findings suggest that as the number of business Master's degrees awarded increases, the Carolina Panthers' seasonal wins tend to decrease. This peculiar negative relationship prompts further investigation into the potential underlying mechanisms. Could it be that fervent business students inadvertently distract the Panthers with their enthusiasm for ROI (Return on Interception)? Or perhaps the rise in Master's degrees in business leads to heightened financial acumen but diminished "quarterbacking" abilities on the field? These questions warrant deeper exploration.

Our study sheds light on a unique intersection of academia and sports and encourages a lighthearted consideration of the peculiar dynamics at play. As we continue to unpick this unexpected correlation, one cannot help but wonder if Carolina Panthers fans should start chanting "MBA, MBA, MBA!" for victory, or if perhaps an excess of finance knowledge truly has the potential to fumble the team's fortunes.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
When it comes to the world of sports, unexpected correlations and surprising connections are always at play. Just like a good play-action pass, we can sometimes find ourselves blindsided by the peculiar relationships between seemingly unrelated phenomena. In this study, we embark on a journey to unravel the curious link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in business and the performance of the Carolina Panthers in the NFL. It's like trying to decode a perfectly executed flea-flicker play - full of twists and turns!
Amidst the excitement of touchdowns and field goals, we couldn't help but notice the eyebrow-raising negative relationship between the annual count of business Master's degrees conferred and the seasonal win records of the Carolina Panthers. It's almost as surprising as a perfectly timed onside kick! As we delved into the data, we were reminded of a classic dad joke: Why don't mathematicians ever play football? Because they always try to divide the field and strive for the perfect symmetry!
Drawing from the National Center for Education Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com, we meticulously examined the numbers and uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of -0.7211661, significant at p < 0.05, for the years 2012 to 2021. It's as if the spirit of statistical significance decided to don a Panthers jersey and join the mix!
The enigmatic negative relationship prompts a cascade of questions that are as perplexing as a Hail Mary pass - do the lofty ambitions of aspiring business leaders somehow detract from the Panthers' prowess on the field? Or does the influx of business acumen lead to a strategic miscalculation when it's fourth down and inches? These inquiries beckon us to enter the realm of humor and bemusement, akin to a perfectly executed end-zone celebration dance.
As we embark on this academic journey, we find ourselves navigating the riveting terrain where business education and gridiron battles meet. We strive to bring forth insights that not only shed light on this surprising relationship but also sprinkle a hint of mirth and whimsy into the world of statistical analysis. Just like a well-timed joke during a tense game, our findings promise to add an element of surprise and delight to the academic playing field.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find a positive correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in business and the Carolina Panthers' seasonal wins. However, in contrast to this finding, "Doe" reports a null relationship, suggesting that business education has no discernible impact on the performance of the Carolina Panthers. "Jones" diverges from these conclusions, proposing a negative association between the two variables, which aligns with the surprising results of our current study. It appears that the link between academic achievement in business and athletic success is as unpredictable as a botched field goal in the wind.

Entering the realm of non-fiction books, "Freakonomics" by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner offers insights into the often unexpected ways in which different aspects of life intersect, much like our investigation into the marriage of academic accolades and athletic triumphs. In a similar vein, Malcolm Gladwell's "Outliers" delves into the underlying factors that contribute to extraordinary success, posing intriguing connections between outliers in education and outliers on the football field. These intellectual musings pave the way for our own exploration of the intriguing relationship between business education and gridiron victories.

Taking a somewhat more fictional turn, "Moneyball" by Michael Lewis presents a captivating narrative of how unconventional statistical analysis revolutionized the game of baseball. While our study focuses on a different sport and a rather unexpected correlation, this tale of unconventional wisdom and statistical insight resonates with the underlying spirit of our investigation. Furthermore, the whimsical "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" by Roald Dahl offers a fantastical perspective on the pursuit of success and the unexpected paths it may lead one down. Similarly, our uncovering of the inverse relationship between business Master's degrees and the Carolina Panthers' wins invites a blend of amusement and curiosity, much like the fantastical journey through Willy Wonka's chocolate factory.

In our quest for a comprehensive understanding of the peculiar association between business education and NFL performance, we broaden our horizons to include data from cartoons and children's shows that we watched for research purposes, of course. The diligent examination of these pop culture references brings us closer to unraveling the perplexing dynamics at play. As we navigate through the colorful world of "SpongeBob SquarePants" and the strategic battles in "Pokémon," we draw parallels to the enthralling strategy and unexpected alliances that may influence the game of football. Just like a well-timed "Who lives in a pineapple under the sea? Absorbent and yellow and porous is he!" our findings aim to inject a dose of levity and surprise into the academic discourse while unraveling the mystifying connection between business Master's degrees and the Carolina Panthers' seasonal wins.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Business and Season wins for the Carolina Panthers. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mastering the Game: Unraveling the Link Between Business Master's Degrees and Carolina Panthers' Season Wins

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in business and the seasonal performance of the Carolina Panthers in the NFL. We draw data from the National Center for Education Statistics to track the annual count of business Master's degrees conferred, and complement this with season win records for the Carolina Panthers sourced from Pro-Football-Reference.com. Our analysis uncovers a rather surprising correlation coefficient of -0.7211661, significant at p < 0.05, for the years 2012 to 2021.

The findings suggest that as the number of business Master's degrees awarded increases, the Carolina Panthers' seasonal wins tend to decrease. This peculiar negative relationship prompts further investigation into the potential underlying mechanisms. Could it be that fervent business students inadvertently distract the Panthers with their enthusiasm for ROI (Return on Interception)? Or perhaps the rise in Master's degrees in business leads to heightened financial acumen but diminished "quarterbacking" abilities on the field? These questions warrant deeper exploration.

Our study sheds light on a unique intersection of academia and sports and encourages a lighthearted consideration of the peculiar dynamics at play. As we continue to unpick this unexpected correlation, one cannot help but wonder if Carolina Panthers fans should start chanting "MBA, MBA, MBA!" for victory, or if perhaps an excess of finance knowledge truly has the potential to fumble the team's fortunes.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
When it comes to the world of sports, unexpected correlations and surprising connections are always at play. Just like a good play-action pass, we can sometimes find ourselves blindsided by the peculiar relationships between seemingly unrelated phenomena. In this study, we embark on a journey to unravel the curious link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in business and the performance of the Carolina Panthers in the NFL. It's like trying to decode a perfectly executed flea-flicker play - full of twists and turns!
Amidst the excitement of touchdowns and field goals, we couldn't help but notice the eyebrow-raising negative relationship between the annual count of business Master's degrees conferred and the seasonal win records of the Carolina Panthers. It's almost as surprising as a perfectly timed onside kick! As we delved into the data, we were reminded of a classic dad joke: Why don't mathematicians ever play football? Because they always try to divide the field and strive for the perfect symmetry!
Drawing from the National Center for Education Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com, we meticulously examined the numbers and uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of -0.7211661, significant at p < 0.05, for the years 2012 to 2021. It's as if the spirit of statistical significance decided to don a Panthers jersey and join the mix!
The enigmatic negative relationship prompts a cascade of questions that are as perplexing as a Hail Mary pass - do the lofty ambitions of aspiring business leaders somehow detract from the Panthers' prowess on the field? Or does the influx of business acumen lead to a strategic miscalculation when it's fourth down and inches? These inquiries beckon us to enter the realm of humor and bemusement, akin to a perfectly executed end-zone celebration dance.
As we embark on this academic journey, we find ourselves navigating the riveting terrain where business education and gridiron battles meet. We strive to bring forth insights that not only shed light on this surprising relationship but also sprinkle a hint of mirth and whimsy into the world of statistical analysis. Just like a well-timed joke during a tense game, our findings promise to add an element of surprise and delight to the academic playing field.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the perplexing connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in business and the seasonal performance of the Carolina Panthers, we employed a methodological approach that was as precise as a referee's whistle and as thorough as an in-depth review of game tape.

Firstly, we meticulously gathered data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com, perusing through their virtual halls like determined seekers of hidden treasures. Our research team scoured the virtual corridors of the internet, navigating through the tumultuous waves of data with the kind of unwavering dedication one might expect from a die-hard fan tracking their team's wins and losses. It was almost as if we were on a quest for statistical enlightenment, with the tantalizing promise of uncovering a correlation that was as unexpected as an onside kick in the first quarter.

After all the data was huddled together, we engaged in a rigorous process of statistical analysis, employing the tried and tested methods of correlation analysis and regression modeling. We examined the number of business Master's degrees awarded annually and juxtaposed these figures with the Carolina Panthers' seasonal win records, like a pair of dance partners executing a perfectly synchronized routine. It was a delightful waltz of numerical harmonization, where the elegant sways of business education and the coordinated footwork of football finesse came together in a mesmerizing display.

Furthermore, we accounted for potential confounding variables such as player injuries, coaching changes, and even the whims of Lady Luck that can sway the outcomes of sports events. It was as if we were donning our own metaphorical shoulder pads and helmets, ready to tackle any lurking sources of bias or ambiguity with a level of strategic readiness comparable to a quarterback scanning the field for an open receiver.

Lastly, we navigated the turbulent waters of statistical significance testing, ensuring that our findings were as solid as a well-anchored offensive line, and presented our results with utmost precision and clarity. It was a bit like executing a perfectly timed play - making sure that every pass, run, and statistical inference was carried out with the finesse and sharpness of a seasoned offensive coordinator devising the game-winning strategy.

In the end, our methodology not only served as a compass guiding us through the uncharted terrain of unexpected correlations but also underscored the sheer joy of unraveling the whimsical mysteries that lie at the intersection of academia and sports. It was akin to a perfectly executed trick play, weaving together the thrill of discovery with the lighthearted spirit of statistical inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Business and Season wins for the Carolina Panthers. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation -0.7211661, r-squared of 0.5200806, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mastering the Game: Unraveling the Link Between Business Master's Degrees and Carolina Panthers' Season Wins

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in business and the seasonal performance of the Carolina Panthers in the NFL. We draw data from the National Center for Education Statistics to track the annual count of business Master's degrees conferred, and complement this with season win records for the Carolina Panthers sourced from Pro-Football-Reference.com. Our analysis uncovers a rather surprising correlation coefficient of -0.7211661, significant at p < 0.05, for the years 2012 to 2021.

The findings suggest that as the number of business Master's degrees awarded increases, the Carolina Panthers' seasonal wins tend to decrease. This peculiar negative relationship prompts further investigation into the potential underlying mechanisms. Could it be that fervent business students inadvertently distract the Panthers with their enthusiasm for ROI (Return on Interception)? Or perhaps the rise in Master's degrees in business leads to heightened financial acumen but diminished "quarterbacking" abilities on the field? These questions warrant deeper exploration.

Our study sheds light on a unique intersection of academia and sports and encourages a lighthearted consideration of the peculiar dynamics at play. As we continue to unpick this unexpected correlation, one cannot help but wonder if Carolina Panthers fans should start chanting "MBA, MBA, MBA!" for victory, or if perhaps an excess of finance knowledge truly has the potential to fumble the team's fortunes.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
When it comes to the world of sports, unexpected correlations and surprising connections are always at play. Just like a good play-action pass, we can sometimes find ourselves blindsided by the peculiar relationships between seemingly unrelated phenomena. In this study, we embark on a journey to unravel the curious link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in business and the performance of the Carolina Panthers in the NFL. It's like trying to decode a perfectly executed flea-flicker play - full of twists and turns!
Amidst the excitement of touchdowns and field goals, we couldn't help but notice the eyebrow-raising negative relationship between the annual count of business Master's degrees conferred and the seasonal win records of the Carolina Panthers. It's almost as surprising as a perfectly timed onside kick! As we delved into the data, we were reminded of a classic dad joke: Why don't mathematicians ever play football? Because they always try to divide the field and strive for the perfect symmetry!
Drawing from the National Center for Education Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com, we meticulously examined the numbers and uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of -0.7211661, significant at p < 0.05, for the years 2012 to 2021. It's as if the spirit of statistical significance decided to don a Panthers jersey and join the mix!
The enigmatic negative relationship prompts a cascade of questions that are as perplexing as a Hail Mary pass - do the lofty ambitions of aspiring business leaders somehow detract from the Panthers' prowess on the field? Or does the influx of business acumen lead to a strategic miscalculation when it's fourth down and inches? These inquiries beckon us to enter the realm of humor and bemusement, akin to a perfectly executed end-zone celebration dance.
As we embark on this academic journey, we find ourselves navigating the riveting terrain where business education and gridiron battles meet. We strive to bring forth insights that not only shed light on this surprising relationship but also sprinkle a hint of mirth and whimsy into the world of statistical analysis. Just like a well-timed joke during a tense game, our findings promise to add an element of surprise and delight to the academic playing field.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in business and the Carolina Panthers' seasonal wins revealed a remarkably strong negative correlation. The correlation coefficient was calculated to be -0.7211661, indicating a substantial inverse relationship between these two variables. It's almost as if the Panthers and business degrees do a perfect pass interference, keeping each other at arm's length!

The r-squared value of 0.5200806 further indicates that approximately 52% of the variability in the Panthers' season wins can be explained by the variation in the number of business Master's degrees awarded. It appears that this unexpected statistical dance resembles a captivating two-minute drill, with each variable jockeying for dominance!

The p-value of less than 0.05 emphasizes the significance of this negative correlation, demonstrating that the relationship is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. It's as if the outcome of this statistical showdown was predetermined by the football gods themselves!

In Figure 1, the scatterplot visually encapsulates the compelling negative relationship between business Master's degrees and Carolina Panthers' seasonal wins. The points elegantly weave a tale of a peculiar tug-of-war between academia and athleticism, almost like a riveting game of "capture the flag," only with data points instead of flags!

It is evident that this unexpected correlation raises thought-provoking questions, much like a clever touchdown play. One can't help but wonder if perhaps the key to the Panthers' success lies not in touchdowns, but in spreadsheets and profit margins. Maybe it's time for Panthers fans to start tailgating at MBA graduation ceremonies! These findings infuse a delightful dose of humor into the often-serious realm of statistical analysis, akin to intercepting a serious discussion with a well-timed pun.

In summary, the results of this study uncover an intriguing and unexpected negative relationship between the number of business Master's degrees awarded and the Carolina Panthers' seasonal wins, prompting further inquiry into the complex interplay between academia and athletic performance. This statistical symphony of academia and athleticism is a reminder that in the world of research, as in football, the most captivating moments often come from the unlikeliest of plays!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Business and Season wins for the Carolina Panthers. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Mastering the Game: Unraveling the Link Between Business Master's Degrees and Carolina Panthers' Season Wins

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in business and the seasonal performance of the Carolina Panthers in the NFL. We draw data from the National Center for Education Statistics to track the annual count of business Master's degrees conferred, and complement this with season win records for the Carolina Panthers sourced from Pro-Football-Reference.com. Our analysis uncovers a rather surprising correlation coefficient of -0.7211661, significant at p < 0.05, for the years 2012 to 2021.

The findings suggest that as the number of business Master's degrees awarded increases, the Carolina Panthers' seasonal wins tend to decrease. This peculiar negative relationship prompts further investigation into the potential underlying mechanisms. Could it be that fervent business students inadvertently distract the Panthers with their enthusiasm for ROI (Return on Interception)? Or perhaps the rise in Master's degrees in business leads to heightened financial acumen but diminished "quarterbacking" abilities on the field? These questions warrant deeper exploration.

Our study sheds light on a unique intersection of academia and sports and encourages a lighthearted consideration of the peculiar dynamics at play. As we continue to unpick this unexpected correlation, one cannot help but wonder if Carolina Panthers fans should start chanting "MBA, MBA, MBA!" for victory, or if perhaps an excess of finance knowledge truly has the potential to fumble the team's fortunes.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find a positive correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in business and the Carolina Panthers' seasonal wins. However, in contrast to this finding, "Doe" reports a null relationship, suggesting that business education has no discernible impact on the performance of the Carolina Panthers. "Jones" diverges from these conclusions, proposing a negative association between the two variables, which aligns with the surprising results of our current study. It appears that the link between academic achievement in business and athletic success is as unpredictable as a botched field goal in the wind.
Entering the realm of non-fiction books, "Freakonomics" by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner offers insights into the often unexpected ways in which different aspects of life intersect, much like our investigation into the marriage of academic accolades and athletic triumphs. In a similar vein, Malcolm Gladwell's "Outliers" delves into the underlying factors that contribute to extraordinary success, posing intriguing connections between outliers in education and outliers on the football field. These intellectual musings pave the way for our own exploration of the intriguing relationship between business education and gridiron victories.
Taking a somewhat more fictional turn, "Moneyball" by Michael Lewis presents a captivating narrative of how unconventional statistical analysis revolutionized the game of baseball. While our study focuses on a different sport and a rather unexpected correlation, this tale of unconventional wisdom and statistical insight resonates with the underlying spirit of our investigation. Furthermore, the whimsical "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" by Roald Dahl offers a fantastical perspective on the pursuit of success and the unexpected paths it may lead one down. Similarly, our uncovering of the inverse relationship between business Master's degrees and the Carolina Panthers' wins invites a blend of amusement and curiosity, much like the fantastical journey through Willy Wonka's chocolate factory.
In our quest for a comprehensive understanding of the peculiar association between business education and NFL performance, we broaden our horizons to include data from cartoons and children's shows that we watched for research purposes, of course. The diligent examination of these pop culture references brings us closer to unraveling the perplexing dynamics at play. As we navigate through the colorful world of "SpongeBob SquarePants" and the strategic battles in "Pokémon," we draw parallels to the enthralling strategy and unexpected alliances that may influence the game of football. Just like a well-timed "Who lives in a pineapple under the sea? Absorbent and yellow and porous is he!" our findings aim to inject a dose of levity and surprise into the academic discourse while unraveling the mystifying connection between business Master's degrees and the Carolina Panthers' seasonal wins.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in business and the Carolina Panthers' seasonal wins revealed a remarkably strong negative correlation. The correlation coefficient was calculated to be -0.7211661, indicating a substantial inverse relationship between these two variables. It's almost as if the Panthers and business degrees do a perfect pass interference, keeping each other at arm's length!
The r-squared value of 0.5200806 further indicates that approximately 52% of the variability in the Panthers' season wins can be explained by the variation in the number of business Master's degrees awarded. It appears that this unexpected statistical dance resembles a captivating two-minute drill, with each variable jockeying for dominance!
The p-value of less than 0.05 emphasizes the significance of this negative correlation, demonstrating that the relationship is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. It's as if the outcome of this statistical showdown was predetermined by the football gods themselves!
In Figure 1, the scatterplot visually encapsulates the compelling negative relationship between business Master's degrees and Carolina Panthers' seasonal wins. The points elegantly weave a tale of a peculiar tug-of-war between academia and athleticism, almost like a riveting game of "capture the flag," only with data points instead of flags!
It is evident that this unexpected correlation raises thought-provoking questions, much like a clever touchdown play. One can't help but wonder if perhaps the key to the Panthers' success lies not in touchdowns, but in spreadsheets and profit margins. Maybe it's time for Panthers fans to start tailgating at MBA graduation ceremonies! These findings infuse a delightful dose of humor into the often-serious realm of statistical analysis, akin to intercepting a serious discussion with a well-timed pun.
In summary, the results of this study uncover an intriguing and unexpected negative relationship between the number of business Master's degrees awarded and the Carolina Panthers' seasonal wins, prompting further inquiry into the complex interplay between academia and athletic performance. This statistical symphony of academia and athleticism is a reminder that in the world of research, as in football, the most captivating moments often come from the unlikeliest of plays!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our investigation into the perplexing association between the number of Master's degrees awarded in business and the Carolina Panthers' seasonal wins has yielded noteworthy findings. The remarkably strong negative correlation we uncovered aligns with the surprising work of "Jones," who similarly proposed a negative association between the two variables. It seems that the Panthers and business degrees indeed engage in a captivating dance, akin to a perfectly executed flea-flicker play on the football field.

Additionally, our results are consistent with the findings of "Smith et al.," who reported a positive correlation between business Master's degrees and the Panthers' seasonal wins. It appears that much like the thrilling ups and downs of a football game, the relationship between academic achievement and athletic success is as unpredictable as a fumbled snap in the red zone. Our study reinforces the idea that in the realm of statistics, just like in football, there's always room for unexpected plot twists.

The presence of a substantial inverse relationship, as indicated by the strong negative correlation coefficient, underscores the unexpected dynamics at play. It's almost as if the Panthers and business degrees are engaged in a comedic game of "three-legged race," each trying to outdo the other in a whimsical and surprising showdown.

Moreover, the significant p-value further emphasizes the validity of this unexpected correlation. It's as if the outcomes of our statistical analysis were scripted by the football gods themselves, adding an element of charming unpredictability to the typically serious world of statistical inquiry. It's like discovering that the key to a winning touchdown might lie not in athletic prowess but in the prowess of business acumen, a true blend of brains and brawn!

While our findings may seem lighthearted, they prompt genuine contemplation about the underlying mechanisms driving this peculiar association. Could it be that the rise in business Master's degrees affects the team dynamics or leadership on the field, akin to an unpredictable blitz from the defense? The unexpected statistical dance we have unraveled offers a reminder that beneath the layers of numbers and data lies a compelling narrative of unlikely allies and unforeseen game-changers.

In conclusion, our study not only contributes to the field of sports statistics but also injects a welcome dose of humor and unexpected delight into the academic discourse, much like a well-timed dad joke at a family gathering. Our results beckon further exploration into the unpredictable connection between academia and athletics, enriching the academic landscape with a dash of whimsy and mirth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Business and Season wins for the Carolina Panthers. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Mastering the Game: Unraveling the Link Between Business Master's Degrees and Carolina Panthers' Season Wins

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in business and the seasonal performance of the Carolina Panthers in the NFL. We draw data from the National Center for Education Statistics to track the annual count of business Master's degrees conferred, and complement this with season win records for the Carolina Panthers sourced from Pro-Football-Reference.com. Our analysis uncovers a rather surprising correlation coefficient of -0.7211661, significant at p < 0.05, for the years 2012 to 2021.

The findings suggest that as the number of business Master's degrees awarded increases, the Carolina Panthers' seasonal wins tend to decrease. This peculiar negative relationship prompts further investigation into the potential underlying mechanisms. Could it be that fervent business students inadvertently distract the Panthers with their enthusiasm for ROI (Return on Interception)? Or perhaps the rise in Master's degrees in business leads to heightened financial acumen but diminished "quarterbacking" abilities on the field? These questions warrant deeper exploration.

Our study sheds light on a unique intersection of academia and sports and encourages a lighthearted consideration of the peculiar dynamics at play. As we continue to unpick this unexpected correlation, one cannot help but wonder if Carolina Panthers fans should start chanting "MBA, MBA, MBA!" for victory, or if perhaps an excess of finance knowledge truly has the potential to fumble the team's fortunes.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
When it comes to the world of sports, unexpected correlations and surprising connections are always at play. Just like a good play-action pass, we can sometimes find ourselves blindsided by the peculiar relationships between seemingly unrelated phenomena. In this study, we embark on a journey to unravel the curious link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in business and the performance of the Carolina Panthers in the NFL. It's like trying to decode a perfectly executed flea-flicker play - full of twists and turns!
Amidst the excitement of touchdowns and field goals, we couldn't help but notice the eyebrow-raising negative relationship between the annual count of business Master's degrees conferred and the seasonal win records of the Carolina Panthers. It's almost as surprising as a perfectly timed onside kick! As we delved into the data, we were reminded of a classic dad joke: Why don't mathematicians ever play football? Because they always try to divide the field and strive for the perfect symmetry!
Drawing from the National Center for Education Statistics and Pro-Football-Reference.com, we meticulously examined the numbers and uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of -0.7211661, significant at p < 0.05, for the years 2012 to 2021. It's as if the spirit of statistical significance decided to don a Panthers jersey and join the mix!
The enigmatic negative relationship prompts a cascade of questions that are as perplexing as a Hail Mary pass - do the lofty ambitions of aspiring business leaders somehow detract from the Panthers' prowess on the field? Or does the influx of business acumen lead to a strategic miscalculation when it's fourth down and inches? These inquiries beckon us to enter the realm of humor and bemusement, akin to a perfectly executed end-zone celebration dance.
As we embark on this academic journey, we find ourselves navigating the riveting terrain where business education and gridiron battles meet. We strive to bring forth insights that not only shed light on this surprising relationship but also sprinkle a hint of mirth and whimsy into the world of statistical analysis. Just like a well-timed joke during a tense game, our findings promise to add an element of surprise and delight to the academic playing field.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in business and the Carolina Panthers' seasonal wins revealed a remarkably strong negative correlation. The correlation coefficient was calculated to be -0.7211661, indicating a substantial inverse relationship between these two variables. It's almost as if the Panthers and business degrees do a perfect pass interference, keeping each other at arm's length!
The r-squared value of 0.5200806 further indicates that approximately 52% of the variability in the Panthers' season wins can be explained by the variation in the number of business Master's degrees awarded. It appears that this unexpected statistical dance resembles a captivating two-minute drill, with each variable jockeying for dominance!
The p-value of less than 0.05 emphasizes the significance of this negative correlation, demonstrating that the relationship is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. It's as if the outcome of this statistical showdown was predetermined by the football gods themselves!
In Figure 1, the scatterplot visually encapsulates the compelling negative relationship between business Master's degrees and Carolina Panthers' seasonal wins. The points elegantly weave a tale of a peculiar tug-of-war between academia and athleticism, almost like a riveting game of "capture the flag," only with data points instead of flags!
It is evident that this unexpected correlation raises thought-provoking questions, much like a clever touchdown play. One can't help but wonder if perhaps the key to the Panthers' success lies not in touchdowns, but in spreadsheets and profit margins. Maybe it's time for Panthers fans to start tailgating at MBA graduation ceremonies! These findings infuse a delightful dose of humor into the often-serious realm of statistical analysis, akin to intercepting a serious discussion with a well-timed pun.
In summary, the results of this study uncover an intriguing and unexpected negative relationship between the number of business Master's degrees awarded and the Carolina Panthers' seasonal wins, prompting further inquiry into the complex interplay between academia and athletic performance. This statistical symphony of academia and athleticism is a reminder that in the world of research, as in football, the most captivating moments often come from the unlikeliest of plays!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study unearths a remarkable negative correlation between the number of business Master's degrees awarded and the seasonal performance of the Carolina Panthers, akin to a well-executed power sweep play with an unexpected twist. The statistical tango between academia and athleticism highlights the beguiling interplay of seemingly disparate domains, much like a perfectly timed lateral pass that leaves spectators in awe.

As we navigate the intriguing terrain of this unexpected relationship, it becomes clear that perhaps the Panthers need not only touchdowns but also a touch of business acumen to secure victory. Could it be that the team could benefit from a "Master's of Business Administration" play in their tactical playbook? It seems that while the Panthers excel at tackles, it's the business graduates who excel at "balance sheets"!

The findings of our research not only add a whimsical touch to the oft-serious world of statistical analysis but also prompt delightful musings on the potential synergies between sports and business education. Just as a well-timed quarterback pass can turn the tide of a game, our results invite a light-hearted reflection on the unexpected dynamics at play. But remember, don't draft a tight end with a fiscal tight end!

In summary, this study provides a lighthearted yet thought-provoking glimpse into the interwoven realms of academia and athletic prowess. In the spirit of a good dad joke, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, as our findings serve as a touchdown in unraveling the fascinating link between business Master's degrees and the Carolina Panthers' season wins.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Mastering the Game: Unraveling the Link Between Business Master's Degrees and Carolina Panthers' Season Wins. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sports Management and Business Analytics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Mastering the Game: Unraveling the Link Between Business Master's Degrees and Carolina Panthers' Season Wins. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Business Wisdom and Sports Success


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Mastering the Game: Unraveling the Link Between Business Master's Degrees and Carolina Panthers' Season Wins with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the intriguing connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in business and the seasonal performance of the Carolina Panthers in the NFL. We draw data from the National Center for Education Statistics to track the annual count of business Master's degrees conferred, and complement this with season win records for the Carolina Panthers sourced from Pro-Football-Reference.com. Our analysis uncovers a rather surprising correlation coefficient of -0.7211661, significant at p < 0.05, for the years 2012 to 2021.
The findings suggest that as the number of business Master's degrees awarded increases, the Carolina Panthers' seasonal wins tend to decrease. This peculiar negative relationship prompts further investigation into the potential underlying mechanisms. Could it be that fervent business students inadvertently distract the Panthers with their enthusiasm for ROI (Return on Interception)? Or perhaps the rise in Master's degrees in business leads to heightened financial acumen but diminished "quarterbacking" abilities on the field? These questions warrant deeper exploration.
Our study sheds light on a unique intersection of academia and sports and encourages a lighthearted consideration of the peculiar dynamics at play. As we continue to unpick this unexpected correlation, one cannot help but wonder if Carolina Panthers fans should start chanting "MBA, MBA, MBA!" for victory, or if perhaps an excess of finance knowledge truly has the potential to fumble the team's fortunes.

ChatGPT:

business Master's degrees, Carolina Panthers, NFL, season wins, correlation coefficient, National Center for Education Statistics, Pro-Football-Reference.com, academic sports analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Master's degrees awarded in Business
Detailed data title: Master's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions in Business
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Master's degrees awarded in Business

Season wins for the Carolina Panthers
Detailed data title: Number of season wins by the Carolina Panthers
Source: Pro-Football-Reference.com
See what else correlates with Season wins for the Carolina Panthers

Correlation r = -0.7211661 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5200806 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 52% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Season wins for the Carolina Panthers) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Master's degrees awarded in Business) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.019. 0.0185842740824739070000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as -0.72 in 1.9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 54 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ -0.93, -0.17 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Master's degrees awarded in Business (Degrees awarded)191606188617189364185236186835187412192191197074197443202334
Season wins for the Carolina Panthers (Panthers wins)7127156117555




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
  5. Inverted Y-axis: I inverted the Y-axis on the chart above so that the lines would move together. This is visually pleasing, but not at all intuitive. Below is a line graph that does not invert the Y-axis.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([191606,188617,189364,185236,186835,187412,192191,197074,197443,202334,])
array_2 = np.array([7,12,7,15,6,11,7,5,5,5,])
array_1_name = "Master's degrees awarded in Business"
array_2_name = "Season wins for the Carolina Panthers"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 3572 · Black Variable ID: 1315 · Red Variable ID: 19652
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0