about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,533 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and the second variable is The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock price (SHW).  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more people became experts in military technologies, they realized that battles could be won with the most advanced paintball weaponry. Sherwin-Williams saw a surge in demand for their high-tech, camouflage coatings, driving up their stock price as they cornered the market in military paint warfare.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that showcases a futuristic hardware store scene in which a group of individuals with Bachelor's degrees in Military technologies and applied sciences are seamlessly blending in with the paint section. The individuals are utilizing their camouflage tactics among the vivid paint cans as they covertly listen in on conversations about painting projects. Add a sleek digital display screen above them, showing the stock price of The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) with a visible significant surge in value. Ensure a seamless integration of futuristic elements and an intense atmosphere. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock price (SHW). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Hyper-realistic Concept art Magic realism 3D Pixar Style Futuristic
ChatGPT: Futuristic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock price (SHW), in the following situation: Because as more people graduated with Bachelor's degrees in Military technologies and applied sciences, they became experts in camouflage tactics, allowing them to blend in seamlessly with the paint section at hardware stores. This increased their ability to overhear conversations about painting projects, leading to a surge in demand for Sherwin-Williams products and subsequently boosting the company's stock price.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a hardware store, a group of individuals with Bachelor's degrees in Military technologies and applied sciences are seamlessly blending in with the paint section, using their camouflage tactics to listen in on conversations about painting projects. Meanwhile, the stock price of The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is displayed on a screen right above them, showing a significant surge in value.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: In a hardware store, a group of individuals with Bachelor's degrees in Military technologies and applied sciences are seamlessly blending in with the paint section, using their camouflage tactics to listen in on conversations about painting projects. Meanwhile, the stock price of The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is displayed on a screen right above them, showing a significant surge in value. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that showcases a futuristic hardware store scene in which a group of individuals with Bachelor's degrees in Military technologies and applied sciences are seamlessly blending in with the paint section. The individuals are utilizing their camouflage tactics among the vivid paint cans as they covertly listen in on conversations about painting projects. Add a sleek digital display screen above them, showing the stock price of The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) with a visible significant surge in value. Ensure a seamless integration of futuristic elements and an intense atmosphere.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences caused The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock price (SHW) to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Painting the Bullseye: The Sherwin-Williams Company's Stock Price and the Military's Technological Might

The Journal of Strategic Color Theory

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock price (SHW). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9896308 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Painting the Bullseye: The Sherwin-Williams Company's Stock Price and the Military's Technological Might"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examined the surprising relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Our research aimed to uncover whether the military's innovative technology and the Sherwin-Williams Company's performance paint a clear and colorful picture of a strong connection. Armed with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we trudged through the numbers to unveil the truth behind this peculiar correlation.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9896308 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. While some may claim that correlation does not imply causation, our research suggests that the military's advancements in technology and Sherwin-Williams’ stock price indeed march in step. Maybe it's not just the camouflage paint that's blending in perfectly with the bull market!

Digging deep into the data, our analysis uncovers a curious connection that may leave skeptics in a bit of a haze. Perhaps a dash of military precision mixed with Sherwin-Williams' colorful portfolio is the winning combination for success in the market. After all, whether in battle or on Wall Street, a well-painted strategy is always essential. As the saying goes, "Why don't soldiers buy Sherwin-Williams paint? Because it won't stick to rank!"

In conclusion, our research highlights an unexpected link between the military's expertise in technology and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock performance. This study not only sheds light on an unconventional correlation, but it also adds a splash of color to the landscape of financial and military research. With this new insight in hand, investors and military enthusiasts may want to start paying closer attention to the hidden brushstrokes that seem to be shaping the market.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock price (SHW). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Painting the Bullseye: The Sherwin-Williams Company's Stock Price and the Military's Technological Might"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examined the surprising relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Our research aimed to uncover whether the military's innovative technology and the Sherwin-Williams Company's performance paint a clear and colorful picture of a strong connection. Armed with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we trudged through the numbers to unveil the truth behind this peculiar correlation.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9896308 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. While some may claim that correlation does not imply causation, our research suggests that the military's advancements in technology and Sherwin-Williams’ stock price indeed march in step. Maybe it's not just the camouflage paint that's blending in perfectly with the bull market!

Digging deep into the data, our analysis uncovers a curious connection that may leave skeptics in a bit of a haze. Perhaps a dash of military precision mixed with Sherwin-Williams' colorful portfolio is the winning combination for success in the market. After all, whether in battle or on Wall Street, a well-painted strategy is always essential. As the saying goes, "Why don't soldiers buy Sherwin-Williams paint? Because it won't stick to rank!"

In conclusion, our research highlights an unexpected link between the military's expertise in technology and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock performance. This study not only sheds light on an unconventional correlation, but it also adds a splash of color to the landscape of financial and military research. With this new insight in hand, investors and military enthusiasts may want to start paying closer attention to the hidden brushstrokes that seem to be shaping the market.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the world of finance and military technology, one might not expect to find common ground, let alone a colorful connection. However, as with all great revelations, sometimes the most surprising correlations are waiting to be uncovered. It's like painting over a camouflage pattern - you never know what's hiding underneath until you start brushing away!

The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) has long held a prominent position in the world of paint and coatings, its stock price a canvas on which investors seek to create their own masterpiece of wealth. On the other hand, the military's technological advances are often viewed through a lens of strategic defense and innovation, like adding a new hue to an ever-changing battlefield.

But what happens when we mix the palette of military technology and the brushstrokes of Sherwin-Williams' stock price? Our research delves into the unexpected, seeking to understand whether these seemingly disparate elements blend together like complementary colors or clash like an amateur's first attempt at a color wheel. It's like the old joke goes, "Why do military personnel often end up choosing Sherwin-Williams as their go-to paint supplier? Because they know a good camouflage when they see one!"

The captivating aspect of this investigation lies in its potential to unveil a unique relationship that may have been hiding in plain sight. Who knew that behind the scenes of battles and business, there could be a shared canvas guiding the strokes of progress and success? It's like trying to paint a stock chart – you have to step back and look at the bigger picture to truly appreciate the varying shades and patterns.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock price (SHW). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Painting the Bullseye: The Sherwin-Williams Company's Stock Price and the Military's Technological Might"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examined the surprising relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Our research aimed to uncover whether the military's innovative technology and the Sherwin-Williams Company's performance paint a clear and colorful picture of a strong connection. Armed with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we trudged through the numbers to unveil the truth behind this peculiar correlation.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9896308 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. While some may claim that correlation does not imply causation, our research suggests that the military's advancements in technology and Sherwin-Williams’ stock price indeed march in step. Maybe it's not just the camouflage paint that's blending in perfectly with the bull market!

Digging deep into the data, our analysis uncovers a curious connection that may leave skeptics in a bit of a haze. Perhaps a dash of military precision mixed with Sherwin-Williams' colorful portfolio is the winning combination for success in the market. After all, whether in battle or on Wall Street, a well-painted strategy is always essential. As the saying goes, "Why don't soldiers buy Sherwin-Williams paint? Because it won't stick to rank!"

In conclusion, our research highlights an unexpected link between the military's expertise in technology and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock performance. This study not only sheds light on an unconventional correlation, but it also adds a splash of color to the landscape of financial and military research. With this new insight in hand, investors and military enthusiasts may want to start paying closer attention to the hidden brushstrokes that seem to be shaping the market.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of finance and military technology, one might not expect to find common ground, let alone a colorful connection. However, as with all great revelations, sometimes the most surprising correlations are waiting to be uncovered. It's like painting over a camouflage pattern - you never know what's hiding underneath until you start brushing away!
The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) has long held a prominent position in the world of paint and coatings, its stock price a canvas on which investors seek to create their own masterpiece of wealth. On the other hand, the military's technological advances are often viewed through a lens of strategic defense and innovation, like adding a new hue to an ever-changing battlefield.
But what happens when we mix the palette of military technology and the brushstrokes of Sherwin-Williams' stock price? Our research delves into the unexpected, seeking to understand whether these seemingly disparate elements blend together like complementary colors or clash like an amateur's first attempt at a color wheel. It's like the old joke goes, "Why do military personnel often end up choosing Sherwin-Williams as their go-to paint supplier? Because they know a good camouflage when they see one!"
The captivating aspect of this investigation lies in its potential to unveil a unique relationship that may have been hiding in plain sight. Who knew that behind the scenes of battles and business, there could be a shared canvas guiding the strokes of progress and success? It's like trying to paint a stock chart – you have to step back and look at the bigger picture to truly appreciate the varying shades and patterns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

To lay the groundwork for our investigation into the curious correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW), we begin by examining previous scholarly works pertinent to the intersection of military technology and corporate performance. Smith et al., in "The Impact of Military Research on Economic Development," highlight the role of military innovations in shaping technological progress and its wider economic implications. A rather serious and solemn study, one might say.

Now, shifting gears from staid scholarship to more practical insights, Doe's "Applying Military Strategy in Corporate Management" offers a more hands-on approach to understanding the potential synergies between military techniques and corporate tactics. Quite a page-turner, one might add.

However, as we wade deeper into the literature, it's also essential to recognize the more lighthearted and unconventional perspectives. Take, for instance, "The Art of War" by Sun Tzu, which despite being an ancient military treatise, still resonates with modern corporate strategists. Or "War Paint: Black-Eyed Blues" by John Doe, a fiction novel that weaves military prowess and corporate intrigue into a gripping narrative. Who knew military technologies and stock prices could be so enthralling?

In a delightfully cheesy crossover, the movie "WarGames" explores the intersection of military technology and uncertainty in the digital age. It's a reminder that sometimes, the lines between military strategy and corporate performance can blur, much like mixing paint colors to find the perfect shade.

In "The Art of War," Lorem and Ipsum note, "In the midst of chaos, there is also opportunity." And while they may have been talking about warfare, it's not hard to see how this philosophy could apply to the world of finance and military technologies. It's like a stock market – lots of ups and downs, but if you mix the right colors, you might just end up with a masterpiece.

As we navigate through the spectrum of literature surrounding this intriguing topic, it becomes evident that the connection between military technologies and corporate performance is not as black and white as one might expect. It's more like a vibrant, multi-colored canvas waiting to be painted – with a few dad jokes thrown in for good measure.

With this groundwork laid, we are prepared to delve into the empirical analysis to shed light on the unexpected correlation between military technologies and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock performance. Let's paint the town... and the stock market!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock price (SHW). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Painting the Bullseye: The Sherwin-Williams Company's Stock Price and the Military's Technological Might"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examined the surprising relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Our research aimed to uncover whether the military's innovative technology and the Sherwin-Williams Company's performance paint a clear and colorful picture of a strong connection. Armed with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we trudged through the numbers to unveil the truth behind this peculiar correlation.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9896308 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. While some may claim that correlation does not imply causation, our research suggests that the military's advancements in technology and Sherwin-Williams’ stock price indeed march in step. Maybe it's not just the camouflage paint that's blending in perfectly with the bull market!

Digging deep into the data, our analysis uncovers a curious connection that may leave skeptics in a bit of a haze. Perhaps a dash of military precision mixed with Sherwin-Williams' colorful portfolio is the winning combination for success in the market. After all, whether in battle or on Wall Street, a well-painted strategy is always essential. As the saying goes, "Why don't soldiers buy Sherwin-Williams paint? Because it won't stick to rank!"

In conclusion, our research highlights an unexpected link between the military's expertise in technology and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock performance. This study not only sheds light on an unconventional correlation, but it also adds a splash of color to the landscape of financial and military research. With this new insight in hand, investors and military enthusiasts may want to start paying closer attention to the hidden brushstrokes that seem to be shaping the market.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of finance and military technology, one might not expect to find common ground, let alone a colorful connection. However, as with all great revelations, sometimes the most surprising correlations are waiting to be uncovered. It's like painting over a camouflage pattern - you never know what's hiding underneath until you start brushing away!
The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) has long held a prominent position in the world of paint and coatings, its stock price a canvas on which investors seek to create their own masterpiece of wealth. On the other hand, the military's technological advances are often viewed through a lens of strategic defense and innovation, like adding a new hue to an ever-changing battlefield.
But what happens when we mix the palette of military technology and the brushstrokes of Sherwin-Williams' stock price? Our research delves into the unexpected, seeking to understand whether these seemingly disparate elements blend together like complementary colors or clash like an amateur's first attempt at a color wheel. It's like the old joke goes, "Why do military personnel often end up choosing Sherwin-Williams as their go-to paint supplier? Because they know a good camouflage when they see one!"
The captivating aspect of this investigation lies in its potential to unveil a unique relationship that may have been hiding in plain sight. Who knew that behind the scenes of battles and business, there could be a shared canvas guiding the strokes of progress and success? It's like trying to paint a stock chart – you have to step back and look at the bigger picture to truly appreciate the varying shades and patterns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the potentially colorful relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW), this study employed a mix of traditional statistical analysis and a sprinkle of military-grade precision. After all, when it comes to uncovering such unexpected connections, you need more than just a thin coat of analysis. Our data sources primarily included the National Center for Education Statistics and the robust analytics of LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), providing us with a comprehensive palette of information from 2012 to 2021.

First, we donned our statistical aprons and started by calculating the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences. This involved sifting through layers of academic data to reveal the unique blend of expertise that the military education landscape was cultivating. It's like discovering the perfect shade of paint – you have to mix and match until you find the one that captures attention.

Next, we turned our attention to The Sherwin-Williams Company’s stock price. We meticulously tracked the daily closing prices, adjusting for splits and dividends, to create a vivid canvas of the company's market performance. The ability to analyze the stock price movements with such detail is akin to examining a masterpiece through a magnifying glass – every brushstroke fitting together to form a coherent and captivating image.

To measure the link between these two seemingly unrelated elements, we employed advanced statistical techniques, including correlation analysis and regression modeling. This allowed us to paint a clearer picture of any potential relationships, ensuring that we didn’t just brush off any subtle nuances. As the old saying goes, "When it comes to statistics, you have to be as precise as a military drill sergeant – there's no room for sloppy analysis!"

Furthermore, we incorporated a time series analysis to capture the dynamic interplay between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of The Sherwin-Williams Company over the study period. It's like observing the ever-changing patterns in a kaleidoscope – just when you think you've seen it all, a new arrangement of colors emerges, creating a fresh perspective.

In addition, we conducted a sentiment analysis of news articles and industry reports to gauge the public perception and market sentiment regarding advancements in military technology and their potential impact on The Sherwin-Williams Company. It's like mixing paint – you have to consider how different colors blend together to create a harmonious whole, just as we considered the blend of market sentiment and technological progress.

Lastly, to ensure the robustness of our findings, we sought expert opinions from financial analysts and military technology specialists. Their insights added depth to our understanding of the underlying mechanisms driving any observed relationship, offering a valuable contrast between market dynamics and technological innovation. It's like mixing primary colors to create secondary ones – sometimes, a different perspective can enrich the overall understanding of the canvas we're trying to comprehend.

In summary, our methodology encapsulates a blend of quantitative analysis, sentiment evaluation, and expert consultation, akin to mixing various components together to create the perfect hue. This approach allowed us to uncover the unexpected connection between military technological expertise and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock performance. After all, what's research without a dash of unexpected color?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock price (SHW). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9896308, r-squared of 0.9793691, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Painting the Bullseye: The Sherwin-Williams Company's Stock Price and the Military's Technological Might"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examined the surprising relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Our research aimed to uncover whether the military's innovative technology and the Sherwin-Williams Company's performance paint a clear and colorful picture of a strong connection. Armed with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we trudged through the numbers to unveil the truth behind this peculiar correlation.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9896308 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. While some may claim that correlation does not imply causation, our research suggests that the military's advancements in technology and Sherwin-Williams’ stock price indeed march in step. Maybe it's not just the camouflage paint that's blending in perfectly with the bull market!

Digging deep into the data, our analysis uncovers a curious connection that may leave skeptics in a bit of a haze. Perhaps a dash of military precision mixed with Sherwin-Williams' colorful portfolio is the winning combination for success in the market. After all, whether in battle or on Wall Street, a well-painted strategy is always essential. As the saying goes, "Why don't soldiers buy Sherwin-Williams paint? Because it won't stick to rank!"

In conclusion, our research highlights an unexpected link between the military's expertise in technology and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock performance. This study not only sheds light on an unconventional correlation, but it also adds a splash of color to the landscape of financial and military research. With this new insight in hand, investors and military enthusiasts may want to start paying closer attention to the hidden brushstrokes that seem to be shaping the market.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the world of finance and military technology, one might not expect to find common ground, let alone a colorful connection. However, as with all great revelations, sometimes the most surprising correlations are waiting to be uncovered. It's like painting over a camouflage pattern - you never know what's hiding underneath until you start brushing away!
The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) has long held a prominent position in the world of paint and coatings, its stock price a canvas on which investors seek to create their own masterpiece of wealth. On the other hand, the military's technological advances are often viewed through a lens of strategic defense and innovation, like adding a new hue to an ever-changing battlefield.
But what happens when we mix the palette of military technology and the brushstrokes of Sherwin-Williams' stock price? Our research delves into the unexpected, seeking to understand whether these seemingly disparate elements blend together like complementary colors or clash like an amateur's first attempt at a color wheel. It's like the old joke goes, "Why do military personnel often end up choosing Sherwin-Williams as their go-to paint supplier? Because they know a good camouflage when they see one!"
The captivating aspect of this investigation lies in its potential to unveil a unique relationship that may have been hiding in plain sight. Who knew that behind the scenes of battles and business, there could be a shared canvas guiding the strokes of progress and success? It's like trying to paint a stock chart – you have to step back and look at the bigger picture to truly appreciate the varying shades and patterns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9896308 between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) for the time period 2012 to 2021. This correlation indicates a strikingly strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the military's technological prowess and Sherwin-Williams' stock performance were engaged in an intricate tango, painting a vivid and dynamic picture of interdependence. Kind of like mixing the perfect shade of green – it's a blend of strength and versatility!

Further, the calculated r-squared value of 0.9793691 provides substantial evidence that the variations in Sherwin-Williams' stock price can be largely explained by the changes in the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences. It's as if the military's colors of progress were directly influencing the vibrant fluctuations in Sherwin-Williams' stock canvas. As they say, "At the end of the day, the right mix of colors leads to a masterpiece – be it on a canvas or in the stock market!"

Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 suggests that the observed correlation is statistically significant, further bolstering the validity of our findings. This implies that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship between these two variables by chance is exceptionally low, making it much more than a mere stroke of luck. It's like discovering a hidden message in a painting that changes the entire narrative – except in this case, the message is a resounding "buy SHW stock"!

Finally, our Figure 1 presents a visually compelling scatterplot depicting the robust correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock price. The tightly clustered data points form a striking pattern, akin to a carefully curated color palette that presents a clear picture of the intertwined nature of these variables. It's like stepping back to admire a completed mural – each data point tells a unique story, but together they form a captivating masterpiece.

In summary, our results solidify the unexpected yet compelling connection between the military's technological expertise and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock performance, shedding light on an unconventional correlation that adds a pop of color to the world of financial and military research. This discovery illustrates that sometimes, the most fascinating patterns emerge when we least expect them, not unlike uncovering a hidden shade in a seemingly ordinary paint swatch.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock price (SHW). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Painting the Bullseye: The Sherwin-Williams Company's Stock Price and the Military's Technological Might"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examined the surprising relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Our research aimed to uncover whether the military's innovative technology and the Sherwin-Williams Company's performance paint a clear and colorful picture of a strong connection. Armed with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we trudged through the numbers to unveil the truth behind this peculiar correlation.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9896308 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. While some may claim that correlation does not imply causation, our research suggests that the military's advancements in technology and Sherwin-Williams’ stock price indeed march in step. Maybe it's not just the camouflage paint that's blending in perfectly with the bull market!

Digging deep into the data, our analysis uncovers a curious connection that may leave skeptics in a bit of a haze. Perhaps a dash of military precision mixed with Sherwin-Williams' colorful portfolio is the winning combination for success in the market. After all, whether in battle or on Wall Street, a well-painted strategy is always essential. As the saying goes, "Why don't soldiers buy Sherwin-Williams paint? Because it won't stick to rank!"

In conclusion, our research highlights an unexpected link between the military's expertise in technology and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock performance. This study not only sheds light on an unconventional correlation, but it also adds a splash of color to the landscape of financial and military research. With this new insight in hand, investors and military enthusiasts may want to start paying closer attention to the hidden brushstrokes that seem to be shaping the market.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To lay the groundwork for our investigation into the curious correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW), we begin by examining previous scholarly works pertinent to the intersection of military technology and corporate performance. Smith et al., in "The Impact of Military Research on Economic Development," highlight the role of military innovations in shaping technological progress and its wider economic implications. A rather serious and solemn study, one might say.
Now, shifting gears from staid scholarship to more practical insights, Doe's "Applying Military Strategy in Corporate Management" offers a more hands-on approach to understanding the potential synergies between military techniques and corporate tactics. Quite a page-turner, one might add.
However, as we wade deeper into the literature, it's also essential to recognize the more lighthearted and unconventional perspectives. Take, for instance, "The Art of War" by Sun Tzu, which despite being an ancient military treatise, still resonates with modern corporate strategists. Or "War Paint: Black-Eyed Blues" by John Doe, a fiction novel that weaves military prowess and corporate intrigue into a gripping narrative. Who knew military technologies and stock prices could be so enthralling?
In a delightfully cheesy crossover, the movie "WarGames" explores the intersection of military technology and uncertainty in the digital age. It's a reminder that sometimes, the lines between military strategy and corporate performance can blur, much like mixing paint colors to find the perfect shade.

In "The Art of War," Lorem and Ipsum note, "In the midst of chaos, there is also opportunity." And while they may have been talking about warfare, it's not hard to see how this philosophy could apply to the world of finance and military technologies. It's like a stock market – lots of ups and downs, but if you mix the right colors, you might just end up with a masterpiece.
As we navigate through the spectrum of literature surrounding this intriguing topic, it becomes evident that the connection between military technologies and corporate performance is not as black and white as one might expect. It's more like a vibrant, multi-colored canvas waiting to be painted – with a few dad jokes thrown in for good measure.
With this groundwork laid, we are prepared to delve into the empirical analysis to shed light on the unexpected correlation between military technologies and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock performance. Let's paint the town... and the stock market!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9896308 between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) for the time period 2012 to 2021. This correlation indicates a strikingly strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the military's technological prowess and Sherwin-Williams' stock performance were engaged in an intricate tango, painting a vivid and dynamic picture of interdependence. Kind of like mixing the perfect shade of green – it's a blend of strength and versatility!
Further, the calculated r-squared value of 0.9793691 provides substantial evidence that the variations in Sherwin-Williams' stock price can be largely explained by the changes in the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences. It's as if the military's colors of progress were directly influencing the vibrant fluctuations in Sherwin-Williams' stock canvas. As they say, "At the end of the day, the right mix of colors leads to a masterpiece – be it on a canvas or in the stock market!"
Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 suggests that the observed correlation is statistically significant, further bolstering the validity of our findings. This implies that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship between these two variables by chance is exceptionally low, making it much more than a mere stroke of luck. It's like discovering a hidden message in a painting that changes the entire narrative – except in this case, the message is a resounding "buy SHW stock"!
Finally, our Figure 1 presents a visually compelling scatterplot depicting the robust correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock price. The tightly clustered data points form a striking pattern, akin to a carefully curated color palette that presents a clear picture of the intertwined nature of these variables. It's like stepping back to admire a completed mural – each data point tells a unique story, but together they form a captivating masterpiece.
In summary, our results solidify the unexpected yet compelling connection between the military's technological expertise and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock performance, shedding light on an unconventional correlation that adds a pop of color to the world of financial and military research. This discovery illustrates that sometimes, the most fascinating patterns emerge when we least expect them, not unlike uncovering a hidden shade in a seemingly ordinary paint swatch.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings not only align with but also enhance the existing body of literature that examines the intersection between military technologies and corporate performance. The overwhelmingly strong correlation coefficient we observed stands as a testament to the significant relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of The Sherwin-Williams Company. It's as if our research revealed a hidden masterpiece in the stock market, much like finding the perfect blend of colors in a paint swatch – a stroke of genius, if you will.

Our results are in line with Smith et al.'s examination of military innovations and their impact on technological progress. Just as military research has driven technological development, our study suggests that the expertise gained in military technologies could lead to an advantageous performance for companies like The Sherwin-Williams Company. It seems that painting a bright future for stock prices may not be limited to just a fresh coat of paint!

Similarly, Doe's work on applying military strategy to corporate management takes on a heightened relevance with our findings. The potential synergies between military techniques and corporate tactics come to life as we witness the dynamic dance between military technological expertise and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock price. It's as if military precision has found its match in the colorful canvas of Sherwin-Williams' performance.

Moreover, our results bring to light the unanticipated yet robust relationship between military technologies and corporate performance. The statistically significant p-value further underscores the legitimacy of our findings, affirming that the observed correlation is not merely a result of chance. It's akin to uncovering a hidden message in a painting – only in this case, the message advises investors to "color" their portfolios with SHW stock.

Our scatterplot visually encapsulates the story told by the correlation, resembling a captivating mural created by the intertwining forces of military expertise and stock performance. It's as if the data points were carefully chosen to reveal a narrative that recognizes the power of military innovation in shaping the market landscape. Much like the right mix of colors on a canvas, the correlation between military technologies and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock price unveils a story of vibrant interdependence.

Ultimately, our study paints a vivid picture of the unexpected yet compelling connection between military technological expertise and corporate performance. This unanticipated correlation not only brightens the landscape of financial and military research but also highlights the intricate dance of ingenuity and innovation in the stock market. After all, when it comes to uncovering hidden patterns, sometimes the most surprising hues blend together to create an awe-inspiring masterpiece.

And in the spirit of our colorful findings, here's a dad joke to wrap up our discussion: "Why did the soldier bring a paintbrush to battle? Because he wanted to camouflage himself as an artist-in-arms!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock price (SHW). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Painting the Bullseye: The Sherwin-Williams Company's Stock Price and the Military's Technological Might"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examined the surprising relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Our research aimed to uncover whether the military's innovative technology and the Sherwin-Williams Company's performance paint a clear and colorful picture of a strong connection. Armed with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we trudged through the numbers to unveil the truth behind this peculiar correlation.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9896308 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. While some may claim that correlation does not imply causation, our research suggests that the military's advancements in technology and Sherwin-Williams’ stock price indeed march in step. Maybe it's not just the camouflage paint that's blending in perfectly with the bull market!

Digging deep into the data, our analysis uncovers a curious connection that may leave skeptics in a bit of a haze. Perhaps a dash of military precision mixed with Sherwin-Williams' colorful portfolio is the winning combination for success in the market. After all, whether in battle or on Wall Street, a well-painted strategy is always essential. As the saying goes, "Why don't soldiers buy Sherwin-Williams paint? Because it won't stick to rank!"

In conclusion, our research highlights an unexpected link between the military's expertise in technology and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock performance. This study not only sheds light on an unconventional correlation, but it also adds a splash of color to the landscape of financial and military research. With this new insight in hand, investors and military enthusiasts may want to start paying closer attention to the hidden brushstrokes that seem to be shaping the market.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the world of finance and military technology, one might not expect to find common ground, let alone a colorful connection. However, as with all great revelations, sometimes the most surprising correlations are waiting to be uncovered. It's like painting over a camouflage pattern - you never know what's hiding underneath until you start brushing away!
The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) has long held a prominent position in the world of paint and coatings, its stock price a canvas on which investors seek to create their own masterpiece of wealth. On the other hand, the military's technological advances are often viewed through a lens of strategic defense and innovation, like adding a new hue to an ever-changing battlefield.
But what happens when we mix the palette of military technology and the brushstrokes of Sherwin-Williams' stock price? Our research delves into the unexpected, seeking to understand whether these seemingly disparate elements blend together like complementary colors or clash like an amateur's first attempt at a color wheel. It's like the old joke goes, "Why do military personnel often end up choosing Sherwin-Williams as their go-to paint supplier? Because they know a good camouflage when they see one!"
The captivating aspect of this investigation lies in its potential to unveil a unique relationship that may have been hiding in plain sight. Who knew that behind the scenes of battles and business, there could be a shared canvas guiding the strokes of progress and success? It's like trying to paint a stock chart – you have to step back and look at the bigger picture to truly appreciate the varying shades and patterns.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9896308 between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) for the time period 2012 to 2021. This correlation indicates a strikingly strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the military's technological prowess and Sherwin-Williams' stock performance were engaged in an intricate tango, painting a vivid and dynamic picture of interdependence. Kind of like mixing the perfect shade of green – it's a blend of strength and versatility!
Further, the calculated r-squared value of 0.9793691 provides substantial evidence that the variations in Sherwin-Williams' stock price can be largely explained by the changes in the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences. It's as if the military's colors of progress were directly influencing the vibrant fluctuations in Sherwin-Williams' stock canvas. As they say, "At the end of the day, the right mix of colors leads to a masterpiece – be it on a canvas or in the stock market!"
Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 suggests that the observed correlation is statistically significant, further bolstering the validity of our findings. This implies that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship between these two variables by chance is exceptionally low, making it much more than a mere stroke of luck. It's like discovering a hidden message in a painting that changes the entire narrative – except in this case, the message is a resounding "buy SHW stock"!
Finally, our Figure 1 presents a visually compelling scatterplot depicting the robust correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock price. The tightly clustered data points form a striking pattern, akin to a carefully curated color palette that presents a clear picture of the intertwined nature of these variables. It's like stepping back to admire a completed mural – each data point tells a unique story, but together they form a captivating masterpiece.
In summary, our results solidify the unexpected yet compelling connection between the military's technological expertise and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock performance, shedding light on an unconventional correlation that adds a pop of color to the world of financial and military research. This discovery illustrates that sometimes, the most fascinating patterns emerge when we least expect them, not unlike uncovering a hidden shade in a seemingly ordinary paint swatch.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has brushed over some fascinating connections between the military's technological prowess and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock performance. This unexpected correlation has unveiled a colorful relationship that adds a splash of intrigue to the otherwise monotonous world of finance and military research. It's like discovering a hidden treasure chest, only instead of gold, it's brimming with statistical significance and dad jokes.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.9896308 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings illuminate a strikingly strong positive relationship that may leave skeptics feeling as if they’ve been painted into a corner. It's like the military's expertise and Sherwin-Williams' stock price are engaging in a poignant dance, a waltz of numbers and nuances that leaves investors marveling at the unexpected beauty of this unlikely pairing.

As we reflect on our results, it’s clear that further research in this area is unnecessary. We have painted a vivid picture of the intertwining forces of military academia and the stock market, leaving little room for doubt. It's like when a painter knows precisely when to put down the brush and step back – the canvas tells a story that requires no further embellishment. Our work here is done, and any more research would simply be an attempt to fix what's not broken. After all, why should we repaint a masterpiece? We've already found the perfect shade of correlation.

In the words of a wise painter, "I can’t stop painting. I can't because I don't want to. I want to experience everything once – like a new color, like a bunch of crazy sherwin-williams stock prices - and I can make other sherwin williams enthusiasts or investors experience it too." And with that, we draw a colorful conclusion to our study, leaving the future of financial and military research bright and full of unexpected connections. Our findings stand as a testament to the fact that sometimes, the most surprising correlations are the ones that paint the most vibrant and compelling narrative. There's no need to whitewash this study with further investigation – it's a work of art in and of itself.

This research has truly painted a new perspective, and with that, we gleefully conclude that no further research is needed in this colorful, captivating area. And remember, why did the painter paint the wall for free? Because it was on the house!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Painting the Bullseye: The Sherwin-Williams Company's Stock Price and the Military's Technological Might. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Strategic Color Theory


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Painting the Bullseye: The Sherwin-Williams Company's Stock Price and the Military's Technological Might. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Military-Industrial Economic Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Painting the Bullseye: The Sherwin-Williams Company's Stock Price and the Military's Technological Might with an abstract of In this study, we examined the surprising relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Our research aimed to uncover whether the military's innovative technology and the Sherwin-Williams Company's performance paint a clear and colorful picture of a strong connection. Armed with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we trudged through the numbers to unveil the truth behind this peculiar correlation.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9896308 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. While some may claim that correlation does not imply causation, our research suggests that the military's advancements in technology and Sherwin-Williams’ stock price indeed march in step. Maybe it's not just the camouflage paint that's blending in perfectly with the bull market!
Digging deep into the data, our analysis uncovers a curious connection that may leave skeptics in a bit of a haze. Perhaps a dash of military precision mixed with Sherwin-Williams' colorful portfolio is the winning combination for success in the market. After all, whether in battle or on Wall Street, a well-painted strategy is always essential. As the saying goes, "Why don't soldiers buy Sherwin-Williams paint? Because it won't stick to rank!"
In conclusion, our research highlights an unexpected link between the military's expertise in technology and The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock performance. This study not only sheds light on an unconventional correlation, but it also adds a splash of color to the landscape of financial and military research. With this new insight in hand, investors and military enthusiasts may want to start paying closer attention to the hidden brushstrokes that seem to be shaping the market.

ChatGPT:

Sherwin-Williams Company, stock price, military technologies, applied sciences, correlation coefficient, National Center for Education Statistics, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, military advancements, technology, camouflage paint, bull market, Wall Street, stock performance, financial research, military research, paint industry, Bachelor's degrees, correlation analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies
Detailed data title: Bachelor's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, in field of study: Military technologies and applied sciences
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies

The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock price (SHW)
Detailed data title: Opening price of The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock price (SHW)

Correlation r = 0.9896308 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9793691 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock price (SHW)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.0E-8. 0.0000000499516924973514500000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 5.0E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 20,019,342 random variables You don't actually need 20 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.96, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies (Degrees awarded)8610518527635846965576711561524
The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock price (SHW) (Stock price)30.135260.6887.3985.7790.24136.86129.79195.01244.99




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([86,105,185,276,358,469,655,767,1156,1524,])
array_2 = np.array([30.13,52,60.68,87.39,85.77,90.24,136.86,129.79,195.01,244.99,])
array_1_name = "Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies"
array_2_name = "The Sherwin-Williams Company's stock price (SHW)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 3533 · Black Variable ID: 1284 · Red Variable ID: 1681
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0