Download png, svg
AI explanation
As people brought home the bacon, Synopsys' stock sizzled because pork-inspired innovation led to a boom in semiconductor demand. It was a case of hog wild spending spurring on the chipper stock performance.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generative prompt: Produce an image in the style of a TIME magazine cover, depicting a scene where families are gathered in their backyard, enjoying a barbecue. They are grilling pork, and the aroma is wafting through the air. In the background, the stock ticker for Synopsys (SNPS) is displayed with numbers steadily rising. Investors are seen eagerly watching the stock price climb while also taking part in the barbecue, indicating the connection between pork spending and the surge in Synopsys' stock price. The visual depiction should be simple and should not include any words or speech bubbles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price (SNPS). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Psychedelic Realistic A TIME magazine cover image Magic realism A photo-realistic image
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price (SNPS), in the following situation: As families brought home the bacon, Synopsys' stock sizzled! Why? Pork spending powered up barbecue sales, igniting demand for SNPS's software in grilling equipment. Investors piggybacked on this mouthwatering trend, driving Synopsys' stock price to hog heaven. Looks like bringing home the bacon can also bring home the profits!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, families are gathered in their backyard, enjoying a barbecue. They are grilling pork and the aroma is wafting through the air. Meanwhile, in the background, the stock ticker for Synopsys (SNPS) is displayed with numbers steadily rising. Investors are seen eagerly watching the stock price climb, while they also take part in the barbecue, indicating the connection between pork spending and the surge in Synopsys' stock price.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, families are gathered in their backyard, enjoying a barbecue. They are grilling pork and the aroma is wafting through the air. Meanwhile, in the background, the stock ticker for Synopsys (SNPS) is displayed with numbers steadily rising. Investors are seen eagerly watching the stock price climb, while they also take part in the barbecue, indicating the connection between pork spending and the surge in Synopsys' stock price. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generative prompt: Produce an image in the style of a TIME magazine cover, depicting a scene where families are gathered in their backyard, enjoying a barbecue. They are grilling pork, and the aroma is wafting through the air. In the background, the stock ticker for Synopsys (SNPS) is displayed with numbers steadily rising. Investors are seen eagerly watching the stock price climb while also taking part in the barbecue, indicating the connection between pork spending and the surge in Synopsys' stock price. The visual depiction should be simple and should not include any words or speech bubbles.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Annual US household spending on pork caused Synopsys' stock price (SNPS) to increase.
AI academic paper
Pork Purchases and Perky Profits: The Peculiar Relationship Between Annual US Household Spending on Pork and Synopsys' Stock Price The Journal of Culinary Economics Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price (SNPS). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title an alliteration.
Your research team used data from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9331142 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Pork Purchases and Perky Profits: The Peculiar Relationship Between Annual US Household Spending on Pork and Synopsys' Stock Price
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the delectably delightful dance between the annual US household spending on pork and the stock price of Synopsys. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a thorough analysis in the span of 2002 to 2022. Our findings revealed a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9331142 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating an undeniably bacon-braided bond between these seemingly unrelated entities. We marinated our statistical models with nuances and flavors, uncovering a sizzling relationship that might just have investors squealing with joy. Our work serves as a pork-ticularly appetizing contribution to the financial and gastronomic literature, shedding light on the unexpected connections that can arise when analyzing seemingly unrelated data points.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price (SNPS). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pork Purchases and Perky Profits: The Peculiar Relationship Between Annual US Household Spending on Pork and Synopsys' Stock Price
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the delectably delightful dance between the annual US household spending on pork and the stock price of Synopsys. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a thorough analysis in the span of 2002 to 2022. Our findings revealed a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9331142 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating an undeniably bacon-braided bond between these seemingly unrelated entities. We marinated our statistical models with nuances and flavors, uncovering a sizzling relationship that might just have investors squealing with joy. Our work serves as a pork-ticularly appetizing contribution to the financial and gastronomic literature, shedding light on the unexpected connections that can arise when analyzing seemingly unrelated data points.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Bacon, pork chops, and Synopsys' stock price - what do these seemingly unrelated entities have in common? Well, we're about to embark on a journey through the tantalizing world of annual US household spending on pork and its savory relationship with the stock price of Synopsys. If you're hungry for some statistical analysis seasoned with a side of humor, you're in for a treat!
While the idea of a connection between pig-related purchases and stock market performance may initially sound as implausible as a bacon-flavored ice cream, our research has uncovered a surprisingly robust relationship that is as captivating as it is amusing. We set out to explore whether there might be more than just a pork belly buy-in when it comes to predicting the fluctuations of a technological powerhouse like Synopsys.
So, grab a fork and knife, or perhaps a calculator and spreadsheet, as we delve into the hypothesis that annual US household spending on pork may be more than just a barometer of dinner preferences – it could hold the key to understanding market movements. After all, who would have thought that the world of finance and the world of pork could collide in such a delectable and unexpected manner?
But before we delve into the meaty details of our findings, let's embark on a journey through the intriguing landscape of seemingly unrelated variables and the underlying theory that guides our investigation. Just like a perfectly cooked rack of ribs, our research is seasoned with a dash of creativity, a pinch of curiosity, and a generous serving of puns. So, sit back, relax, and prepare to savor the intellectually fulfilling and, dare we say, pig-tastic adventure that lies ahead!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price (SNPS). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pork Purchases and Perky Profits: The Peculiar Relationship Between Annual US Household Spending on Pork and Synopsys' Stock Price
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the delectably delightful dance between the annual US household spending on pork and the stock price of Synopsys. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a thorough analysis in the span of 2002 to 2022. Our findings revealed a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9331142 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating an undeniably bacon-braided bond between these seemingly unrelated entities. We marinated our statistical models with nuances and flavors, uncovering a sizzling relationship that might just have investors squealing with joy. Our work serves as a pork-ticularly appetizing contribution to the financial and gastronomic literature, shedding light on the unexpected connections that can arise when analyzing seemingly unrelated data points.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Bacon, pork chops, and Synopsys' stock price - what do these seemingly unrelated entities have in common? Well, we're about to embark on a journey through the tantalizing world of annual US household spending on pork and its savory relationship with the stock price of Synopsys. If you're hungry for some statistical analysis seasoned with a side of humor, you're in for a treat!
While the idea of a connection between pig-related purchases and stock market performance may initially sound as implausible as a bacon-flavored ice cream, our research has uncovered a surprisingly robust relationship that is as captivating as it is amusing. We set out to explore whether there might be more than just a pork belly buy-in when it comes to predicting the fluctuations of a technological powerhouse like Synopsys.
So, grab a fork and knife, or perhaps a calculator and spreadsheet, as we delve into the hypothesis that annual US household spending on pork may be more than just a barometer of dinner preferences – it could hold the key to understanding market movements. After all, who would have thought that the world of finance and the world of pork could collide in such a delectable and unexpected manner?
But before we delve into the meaty details of our findings, let's embark on a journey through the intriguing landscape of seemingly unrelated variables and the underlying theory that guides our investigation. Just like a perfectly cooked rack of ribs, our research is seasoned with a dash of creativity, a pinch of curiosity, and a generous serving of puns. So, sit back, relax, and prepare to savor the intellectually fulfilling and, dare we say, pig-tastic adventure that lies ahead!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of seemingly unrelated variables has long been a fascination in the realm of research and academia. Smith (2015) delves into the unexpected interplay of economic indicators, while Doe (2018) examines the quirky correlations that can arise between consumer behavior and stock prices. In a similar vein, Jones (2020) ventures into the uncharted territory of gastronomic influences on financial markets, uncovering the surprising ways in which consumer consumption patterns can impact investment decisions.
Moving beyond the traditional confines of financial and economic literature, our investigation also draws inspiration from non-fiction works such as "Freakonomics" by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner, where the authors skillfully dissect seemingly unrelated phenomena to unveil their hidden connections. Additionally, "The Tipping Point" by Malcolm Gladwell provides valuable insights into the unexpected factors that can drive market dynamics, urging us to consider the unexplored implications of household spending on pork.
In the realm of fiction, where imagination knows no bounds, we draw parallels to works like "Moneyball" by Michael Lewis, where the unorthodox application of data analysis transforms the world of baseball – prompting us to ponder if a similar unexpected breakthrough awaits in the correlation between pork purchases and stock prices. The whimsical world of "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" by Roald Dahl also offers a playful reminder that seemingly unrelated elements can coalesce in unforeseen ways, much like the delightful fusion of pork spending and stock market trajectories.
Drawing inspiration from the world of board games, the unpredictable twists and turns of "Clue" encourage us to consider the unexpected and plot-changing factors that may influence market movements, challenging conventional wisdom in our exploration of the porcine-stock price relationship. Additionally, in the strategic realm of "Settlers of Catan," where resource management and trade dynamics reign supreme, we are reminded that the most unlikely commodities can hold the key to unforeseen success – perhaps even in the context of pork's influence on stock prices.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price (SNPS). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pork Purchases and Perky Profits: The Peculiar Relationship Between Annual US Household Spending on Pork and Synopsys' Stock Price
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the delectably delightful dance between the annual US household spending on pork and the stock price of Synopsys. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a thorough analysis in the span of 2002 to 2022. Our findings revealed a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9331142 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating an undeniably bacon-braided bond between these seemingly unrelated entities. We marinated our statistical models with nuances and flavors, uncovering a sizzling relationship that might just have investors squealing with joy. Our work serves as a pork-ticularly appetizing contribution to the financial and gastronomic literature, shedding light on the unexpected connections that can arise when analyzing seemingly unrelated data points.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Bacon, pork chops, and Synopsys' stock price - what do these seemingly unrelated entities have in common? Well, we're about to embark on a journey through the tantalizing world of annual US household spending on pork and its savory relationship with the stock price of Synopsys. If you're hungry for some statistical analysis seasoned with a side of humor, you're in for a treat!
While the idea of a connection between pig-related purchases and stock market performance may initially sound as implausible as a bacon-flavored ice cream, our research has uncovered a surprisingly robust relationship that is as captivating as it is amusing. We set out to explore whether there might be more than just a pork belly buy-in when it comes to predicting the fluctuations of a technological powerhouse like Synopsys.
So, grab a fork and knife, or perhaps a calculator and spreadsheet, as we delve into the hypothesis that annual US household spending on pork may be more than just a barometer of dinner preferences – it could hold the key to understanding market movements. After all, who would have thought that the world of finance and the world of pork could collide in such a delectable and unexpected manner?
But before we delve into the meaty details of our findings, let's embark on a journey through the intriguing landscape of seemingly unrelated variables and the underlying theory that guides our investigation. Just like a perfectly cooked rack of ribs, our research is seasoned with a dash of creativity, a pinch of curiosity, and a generous serving of puns. So, sit back, relax, and prepare to savor the intellectually fulfilling and, dare we say, pig-tastic adventure that lies ahead!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To embark on our porcine quest and uncover the succulent secrets of annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price, we employed a methodology as diverse and flavorful as a charcuterie board. Our data collection process resembled a grand feast, with morsels gathered from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the delectable offerings of LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). We perused the data from 2002 to 2022, ensuring a comprehensive exploration of the interplay between these seemingly disparate entities.
First, we gnawed through the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, delving into the intricate details of annual US household spending on pork. Uncovering the tantalizing tidbits of pork-related expenditures, we carefully sliced and diced the data to prepare it for a scrumptious statistical feast.
Simultaneously, we indulged in the sumptuous spread of data from LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), where we hungrily devoured the daily stock prices of Synopsys. This flavorful dataset provided the necessary foundation for our investigation into the delectably bewildering dance between pork purchases and stock market performance.
Once we had gathered these gustatory delights, we fired up the statistical grill to cook up a hearty regression analysis. Applying a sizzling blend of statistical techniques, beginning with simple linear regression and advancing to more complex models, we marinated our data with a dash of sophistication and a pinch of modeling finesse. Our goal was to unveil the nuanced flavors of the relationship between these two seemingly unrelated ingredients – annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price.
After achieving statistical satiation, we garnished our analysis with the appropriate flavorings, including correlation coefficients, p-values, and a sprinkling of confidence intervals. Through this process, we uncovered a surprising, mouthwatering correlation coefficient of 0.9331142 and a p-value that left us more confident in our findings than a hog in mud.
Ultimately, our methodological smorgasbord allowed us to savor the secrets of this unexpected alliance, serving up a research dish that is as nourishing to the mind as it is deliciously entertaining. Our research is sure to leave readers with a hearty appreciation for the unanticipated connections that can emerge when seemingly unrelated variables are paired together in the statistical kitchen. So, bon appétit – or should we say, bon économie and bonne appetite!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price (SNPS). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .
For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9331142, r-squared of 0.8707021, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pork Purchases and Perky Profits: The Peculiar Relationship Between Annual US Household Spending on Pork and Synopsys' Stock Price
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the delectably delightful dance between the annual US household spending on pork and the stock price of Synopsys. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a thorough analysis in the span of 2002 to 2022. Our findings revealed a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9331142 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating an undeniably bacon-braided bond between these seemingly unrelated entities. We marinated our statistical models with nuances and flavors, uncovering a sizzling relationship that might just have investors squealing with joy. Our work serves as a pork-ticularly appetizing contribution to the financial and gastronomic literature, shedding light on the unexpected connections that can arise when analyzing seemingly unrelated data points.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Bacon, pork chops, and Synopsys' stock price - what do these seemingly unrelated entities have in common? Well, we're about to embark on a journey through the tantalizing world of annual US household spending on pork and its savory relationship with the stock price of Synopsys. If you're hungry for some statistical analysis seasoned with a side of humor, you're in for a treat!
While the idea of a connection between pig-related purchases and stock market performance may initially sound as implausible as a bacon-flavored ice cream, our research has uncovered a surprisingly robust relationship that is as captivating as it is amusing. We set out to explore whether there might be more than just a pork belly buy-in when it comes to predicting the fluctuations of a technological powerhouse like Synopsys.
So, grab a fork and knife, or perhaps a calculator and spreadsheet, as we delve into the hypothesis that annual US household spending on pork may be more than just a barometer of dinner preferences – it could hold the key to understanding market movements. After all, who would have thought that the world of finance and the world of pork could collide in such a delectable and unexpected manner?
But before we delve into the meaty details of our findings, let's embark on a journey through the intriguing landscape of seemingly unrelated variables and the underlying theory that guides our investigation. Just like a perfectly cooked rack of ribs, our research is seasoned with a dash of creativity, a pinch of curiosity, and a generous serving of puns. So, sit back, relax, and prepare to savor the intellectually fulfilling and, dare we say, pig-tastic adventure that lies ahead!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a swine-fully strong correlation between annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price over the twenty-year period from 2002 to 2022. Our analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9331142, indicating a bacon-tastic relationship between these two variables. This coefficient is as robust as a thick-cut pork chop and suggests a highly positive linear association between the annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price.
Additionally, the coefficient of determination (R-squared) was calculated to be 0.8707021, implying that approximately 87.07% of the variability in Synopsys' stock price can be explained by changes in annual US household spending on pork. This finding further emphasizes the significance of the porcine influence on the stock market.
Furthermore, the p-value obtained from our analysis was less than 0.01, signifying a very high level of statistical significance. In other words, the probability of observing such a strong relationship between annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price by random chance alone is rarer than a unicorn sighting at a pig farm.
The striking correlation and statistical significance in our results indicate that the annual US household spending on pork has not only tantalized taste buds but has also pork-pounded its way into the world of financial markets, leaving a sizzling imprint on the performance of Synopsys' stock. These findings provide compelling evidence that a pork pie might just be a wise investment, not just for the palate but also for the portfolio.
For a visual representation of this swine-sensational relationship, refer to Figure 1, which displays a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price.
In conclusion, our results unveil a bacon-braided bond between pork purchases and perky profits, shedding light on the unexpectedly savory link between annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price. These findings bear significant implications for investors, economists, and culinary enthusiasts alike, emphasizing the need to consider pork-related consumer behavior as a key ingredient in understanding market dynamics.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price (SNPS). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Pork Purchases and Perky Profits: The Peculiar Relationship Between Annual US Household Spending on Pork and Synopsys' Stock Price
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the delectably delightful dance between the annual US household spending on pork and the stock price of Synopsys. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a thorough analysis in the span of 2002 to 2022. Our findings revealed a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9331142 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating an undeniably bacon-braided bond between these seemingly unrelated entities. We marinated our statistical models with nuances and flavors, uncovering a sizzling relationship that might just have investors squealing with joy. Our work serves as a pork-ticularly appetizing contribution to the financial and gastronomic literature, shedding light on the unexpected connections that can arise when analyzing seemingly unrelated data points.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of seemingly unrelated variables has long been a fascination in the realm of research and academia. Smith (2015) delves into the unexpected interplay of economic indicators, while Doe (2018) examines the quirky correlations that can arise between consumer behavior and stock prices. In a similar vein, Jones (2020) ventures into the uncharted territory of gastronomic influences on financial markets, uncovering the surprising ways in which consumer consumption patterns can impact investment decisions.
Moving beyond the traditional confines of financial and economic literature, our investigation also draws inspiration from non-fiction works such as "Freakonomics" by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner, where the authors skillfully dissect seemingly unrelated phenomena to unveil their hidden connections. Additionally, "The Tipping Point" by Malcolm Gladwell provides valuable insights into the unexpected factors that can drive market dynamics, urging us to consider the unexplored implications of household spending on pork.
In the realm of fiction, where imagination knows no bounds, we draw parallels to works like "Moneyball" by Michael Lewis, where the unorthodox application of data analysis transforms the world of baseball – prompting us to ponder if a similar unexpected breakthrough awaits in the correlation between pork purchases and stock prices. The whimsical world of "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" by Roald Dahl also offers a playful reminder that seemingly unrelated elements can coalesce in unforeseen ways, much like the delightful fusion of pork spending and stock market trajectories.
Drawing inspiration from the world of board games, the unpredictable twists and turns of "Clue" encourage us to consider the unexpected and plot-changing factors that may influence market movements, challenging conventional wisdom in our exploration of the porcine-stock price relationship. Additionally, in the strategic realm of "Settlers of Catan," where resource management and trade dynamics reign supreme, we are reminded that the most unlikely commodities can hold the key to unforeseen success – perhaps even in the context of pork's influence on stock prices.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a swine-fully strong correlation between annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price over the twenty-year period from 2002 to 2022. Our analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9331142, indicating a bacon-tastic relationship between these two variables. This coefficient is as robust as a thick-cut pork chop and suggests a highly positive linear association between the annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price.
Additionally, the coefficient of determination (R-squared) was calculated to be 0.8707021, implying that approximately 87.07% of the variability in Synopsys' stock price can be explained by changes in annual US household spending on pork. This finding further emphasizes the significance of the porcine influence on the stock market.
Furthermore, the p-value obtained from our analysis was less than 0.01, signifying a very high level of statistical significance. In other words, the probability of observing such a strong relationship between annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price by random chance alone is rarer than a unicorn sighting at a pig farm.
The striking correlation and statistical significance in our results indicate that the annual US household spending on pork has not only tantalized taste buds but has also pork-pounded its way into the world of financial markets, leaving a sizzling imprint on the performance of Synopsys' stock. These findings provide compelling evidence that a pork pie might just be a wise investment, not just for the palate but also for the portfolio.
For a visual representation of this swine-sensational relationship, refer to Figure 1, which displays a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price.
In conclusion, our results unveil a bacon-braided bond between pork purchases and perky profits, shedding light on the unexpectedly savory link between annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price. These findings bear significant implications for investors, economists, and culinary enthusiasts alike, emphasizing the need to consider pork-related consumer behavior as a key ingredient in understanding market dynamics.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The sizzling results of our analysis bring home the bacon, showcasing a tantalizingly strong relationship between annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price. This eye-opening correlation is like a well-crafted recipe - seemingly disparate ingredients combining to create a delectable dish of statistical significance.
Our findings align with prior research that has probed the quirky connections between consumer behavior and stock market movements. Just as Smith (2015) uncovered unexpected interplays of economic indicators and Doe (2018) delved into quirky correlations, our work adds a pork-ticularly savory flavor to this literature by highlighting the influence of pork purchases on stock prices. This supports the notion that seemingly unrelated variables may hold surprising power over financial markets, much like a stealthy sous-chef quietly shaping the outcome of a culinary masterpiece.
Drawing inspiration from non-fiction works such as "Freakonomics" and "The Tipping Point," our analysis underscores the importance of considering unexplored factors in market dynamics. Just as Malcolm Gladwell emphasizes the impact of unexpected elements on tipping points, our findings indicate that household spending on pork may serve as a bacon-tastic tipping point for the stock price of Synopsys.
In the whimsical realm of fiction, where imagination knows no bounds, our exploration resonates with works like "Moneyball" and "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory." The unorthodox application of data analysis in "Moneyball" finds a parallel in our unexpected correlation, while the fusion of seemingly unrelated elements in "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" mirrors the delightful confluence of pork spending and stock trajectories. In a similar vein, the unpredictable twists of "Clue" and the strategic resource management in "Settlers of Catan" remind us that the most unlikely commodities can yield unforeseen success, much like the influence of pork on stock prices.
Our results underscore the swine-fully strong correlation between annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price, akin to a fine pairing of wine and cheese. This unexpected connection challenges conventional wisdom, urging investors to consider the unforeseen impact of consumer choices on stock performance. Our findings contribute a new and flavorful dimension to the understanding of market dynamics, highlighting that the economic and gastronomic worlds are not as far apart as one might think.
In closing, our study serves up a compelling reminder that in the delicate dance of market forces, the pork industry might just be serving a feast for investors, tempting them with a pork-tentially lucrative opportunity.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price (SNPS). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Pork Purchases and Perky Profits: The Peculiar Relationship Between Annual US Household Spending on Pork and Synopsys' Stock Price
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the delectably delightful dance between the annual US household spending on pork and the stock price of Synopsys. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a thorough analysis in the span of 2002 to 2022. Our findings revealed a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9331142 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating an undeniably bacon-braided bond between these seemingly unrelated entities. We marinated our statistical models with nuances and flavors, uncovering a sizzling relationship that might just have investors squealing with joy. Our work serves as a pork-ticularly appetizing contribution to the financial and gastronomic literature, shedding light on the unexpected connections that can arise when analyzing seemingly unrelated data points.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
Bacon, pork chops, and Synopsys' stock price - what do these seemingly unrelated entities have in common? Well, we're about to embark on a journey through the tantalizing world of annual US household spending on pork and its savory relationship with the stock price of Synopsys. If you're hungry for some statistical analysis seasoned with a side of humor, you're in for a treat!
While the idea of a connection between pig-related purchases and stock market performance may initially sound as implausible as a bacon-flavored ice cream, our research has uncovered a surprisingly robust relationship that is as captivating as it is amusing. We set out to explore whether there might be more than just a pork belly buy-in when it comes to predicting the fluctuations of a technological powerhouse like Synopsys.
So, grab a fork and knife, or perhaps a calculator and spreadsheet, as we delve into the hypothesis that annual US household spending on pork may be more than just a barometer of dinner preferences – it could hold the key to understanding market movements. After all, who would have thought that the world of finance and the world of pork could collide in such a delectable and unexpected manner?
But before we delve into the meaty details of our findings, let's embark on a journey through the intriguing landscape of seemingly unrelated variables and the underlying theory that guides our investigation. Just like a perfectly cooked rack of ribs, our research is seasoned with a dash of creativity, a pinch of curiosity, and a generous serving of puns. So, sit back, relax, and prepare to savor the intellectually fulfilling and, dare we say, pig-tastic adventure that lies ahead!
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a swine-fully strong correlation between annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price over the twenty-year period from 2002 to 2022. Our analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9331142, indicating a bacon-tastic relationship between these two variables. This coefficient is as robust as a thick-cut pork chop and suggests a highly positive linear association between the annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price.
Additionally, the coefficient of determination (R-squared) was calculated to be 0.8707021, implying that approximately 87.07% of the variability in Synopsys' stock price can be explained by changes in annual US household spending on pork. This finding further emphasizes the significance of the porcine influence on the stock market.
Furthermore, the p-value obtained from our analysis was less than 0.01, signifying a very high level of statistical significance. In other words, the probability of observing such a strong relationship between annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price by random chance alone is rarer than a unicorn sighting at a pig farm.
The striking correlation and statistical significance in our results indicate that the annual US household spending on pork has not only tantalized taste buds but has also pork-pounded its way into the world of financial markets, leaving a sizzling imprint on the performance of Synopsys' stock. These findings provide compelling evidence that a pork pie might just be a wise investment, not just for the palate but also for the portfolio.
For a visual representation of this swine-sensational relationship, refer to Figure 1, which displays a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price.
In conclusion, our results unveil a bacon-braided bond between pork purchases and perky profits, shedding light on the unexpectedly savory link between annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price. These findings bear significant implications for investors, economists, and culinary enthusiasts alike, emphasizing the need to consider pork-related consumer behavior as a key ingredient in understanding market dynamics.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our research has uncovered a delightfully delectable dance between annual US household spending on pork and Synopsys' stock price, leaving us with a set of findings that are as unexpected as finding truffle in a ham sandwich. The swine-tastically strong correlation coefficient of 0.9331142 has proven to be as reliable as a boar guarding its precious acorns, providing evidence of a bond that would make even the most avid bacon enthusiasts oink with excitement.
The coefficient of determination (R-squared) of 0.8707021 further cements the relevance of pork-related expenditure in predicting Synopsys' stock price movements, demonstrating that the porcine influence permeates deeper into the market than a marinade into a succulent pork tenderloin. Yes, it appears that the pork barrel politics have extended into the financial realm!
Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the likelihood of such a strong relationship occurring by random chance alone is about as rare as finding a four-leaf clover in a pigsty. This statistically significant finding emphasizes that the bond between pork purchases and stock price perky profits is as real as the sound of sizzling bacon on a Sunday morning.
Our research serves as a true testament to the bacon-braided bond between consumer preferences and market performance, offering a window into the quirky interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated entities. It is a reminder that, just like a savory BBQ sauce, financial analysis can be both serious and tangy!
Ultimately, our findings highlight the importance of considering pork-related consumer behavior as a flavorful ingredient in the recipe for understanding market dynamics. It seems that, when it comes to predicting stock price movements, consumers' passion for pork might hold the key to unlocking a veritable treasure trove of investment opportunities.
As for future research, we argue that no further studies are needed in this area. Our findings have sizzled their way into the annals of finance, leaving little room for doubt about the bacon and stocks connection. It's time to let this pork-uliar yet robust relationship marinate in the world of financial literature – no need to cry wee, wee, wee all the way to the research lab anymore!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Pork Purchases and Perky Profits: The Peculiar Relationship Between Annual US Household Spending on Pork and Synopsys' Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Culinary Economics
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Pork Purchases and Perky Profits: The Peculiar Relationship Between Annual US Household Spending on Pork and Synopsys' Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Culinary Economics Research
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Pork Purchases and Perky Profits: The Peculiar Relationship Between Annual US Household Spending on Pork and Synopsys' Stock Price with an abstract of This study delves into the delectably delightful dance between the annual US household spending on pork and the stock price of Synopsys. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a thorough analysis in the span of 2002 to 2022. Our findings revealed a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9331142 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating an undeniably bacon-braided bond between these seemingly unrelated entities. We marinated our statistical models with nuances and flavors, uncovering a sizzling relationship that might just have investors squealing with joy. Our work serves as a pork-ticularly appetizing contribution to the financial and gastronomic literature, shedding light on the unexpected connections that can arise when analyzing seemingly unrelated data points.
ChatGPT:
annual US household spending on pork, Synopsys stock price, Bureau of Labor Statistics, LSEG Analytics, pork consumption, US household expenses, correlation between pork spending and stock prices, financial analysis, investment correlation, data analysis, statistical modeling, unexpected data connections
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Annual US household spending on porkDetailed data title: Average annual household spend on pork
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
See what else correlates with Annual US household spending on pork
Synopsys' stock price (SNPS)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Synopsys (SNPS) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
See what else correlates with Synopsys' stock price (SNPS)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8707021 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 87.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Synopsys' stock price (SNPS)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Annual US household spending on pork) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.0E-10. 0.0000000006982515876772830000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 7.0E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,432,148,552 random variables You don't actually need 1 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.84, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
Annual US household spending on pork (Household spend) | 167 | 171 | 181 | 153 | 157 | 150 | 163 | 168 | 149 | 162 | 166 | 170 | 177 | 165 | 169 | 181 | 180 | 187 | 214 | 223 | 246 |
Synopsys' stock price (SNPS) (Stock price) | 29.5 | 23.05 | 33.73 | 19.73 | 20.22 | 26.7 | 25.88 | 18.31 | 22.21 | 27.05 | 27.53 | 32.38 | 40.33 | 43.73 | 45.11 | 59.27 | 85.9 | 82.37 | 140.31 | 260 | 367.13 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([167,171,181,153,157,150,163,168,149,162,166,170,177,165,169,181,180,187,214,223,246,])
array_2 = np.array([29.5,23.05,33.73,19.73,20.22,26.7,25.88,18.31,22.21,27.05,27.53,32.38,40.33,43.73,45.11,59.27,85.9,82.37,140.31,260,367.13,])
array_1_name = "Annual US household spending on pork"
array_2_name = "Synopsys' stock price (SNPS)"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Annual US household spending on pork
- Line chart for only Synopsys' stock price (SNPS)
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Pork Purchases and Perky Profits: The Peculiar Relationship Between Annual US Household Spending on Pork and Synopsys' Stock Price
Hats off to you for rating!
Correlation ID: 3532 · Black Variable ID: 19890 · Red Variable ID: 1678